Client Update OFAC Provides Additional Iran Sanctions Guidance

Similar documents
A. 1. What is Implementation Day? When does the lifting of sanctions under the JCPOA go into effect?

Client Update U.S. and EU Continue to Expand Ukraine-related Sanctions and Clarify Sanctions Targeting Russian Companies

Client Update NYDFS Issues Final Anti- Money Laundering and Sanctions Rule

United States Sanctions: General Considerations for Minority Investment

Counterterrorism and Humanitarian Engagement Project

OFAC Compliance- Internal Compliance Program

REGULATORY ADVISORY 14 FEBRUARY 2014

BACKGROUND. Client Update JUNE 15, NEW YORK Gregory J. Lyons Andrew B. Butler

US Companies Should Proceed Cautiously Into Cuba and Iran

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

U.S. Economic Sanctions Laws and How They Affect Insurance Brokers

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

IRS Issues Final FATCA Regulations

INTERNATIONAL CORRESPONDENT BANKING

GOODMAN GLOBAL GROUP, INC. EXPORT CONTROL AND SANCTIONS COMPLIANCE POLICY

OFAC Office of Foreign Assets Control

OFAC Sanctions on Iran, Syria, Yemen, and Burma: Compliance Strategies

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES

Russian Energy Sector Sanctions: One Year On

Assets Control ( OFAC ) is amending the Cuban Assets Control. Regulations to implement a provision of the Omnibus

CHAPTER IV: SECTION 7 COMPLIANCE WITH U.S. SANCTIONS

Cuba Sanctions: 10 Important Changes

OFAC Licensing: Exceptions to Economic Sanctions Prohibitions

How To Get A License To Sell A Computer In Iran

DECEMBER 8, 2010 FINANCIAL MARKETS UPDATE. SEC Proposes Rules Exempting Certain Private Fund Advisers from Investment Adviser Registration.

We greatly appreciate your attention to this request and look forward to further dialogue with OFAC on these issues going forward.

April 8, I. Background.

What do I do if I inherited money in Iran? What do I do if I inherited property in Iran?

BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST BOARD OF TRUSTEES CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES

Presented by: Erich C. Ferrari, Ferrari Legal, P.C.

How To Know If You Can Pay In Khanese Khan

SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is

DOING BUSINESS IN IRAN

This Policy supersedes the Terex Corporation Policy on Transactions in Iran, dated June 7, 2013.

Companies Need to Take a "Layered Approach" to Sanctions Compliance: US and EU Expand Sanctions Against Russia

Control Considerations For Auditing the OFAC Affidavit Program

SUMMARY: This document contains final regulations relating to qualified

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 32 / Wednesday, February 18, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

Cuban Regulations and Recent Easing of Activities in Cuba

CFIUS and Network Security Agreements 1

COMPUTER & INTERNET. Westlaw Journal. Expert Analysis Software Development and U.S. Export Controls

Country Sanctions Program

Journal of Investment Compliance Emerald Article: OFAC compliance in the securities and investment sector

Trust for Professional Managers and Aurora Investment Management L.L.C.; Notice of. Agency: Securities and Exchange Commission ( Commission ).

New Proposed Department of Energy Rules to Clarify and Update Part 810. By Shannon MacMichael and Michael Lieberman of Steptoe & Johnson, LLP 1

Key Points about DOL s Proposed Fiduciary Definition

Cuba Trade Opportunities: What You Should Know

Risk Factors for OFAC Compliance in the Securities Industry

SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is

Final Regulations Address Foreign Tax Credit Generator Transactions

Summary of the North Korea Sanctions and Policy Enhancement Act of 2016

Circular to Assureds (no ) Background

Client Update FinCEN Proposes Anti-Money Laundering Rules for Investment Advisers

Evolving Legal Compliance Risks in Russia and Iran

Rule 15a-6: Safe Harbor for Unregistered Foreign Broker-Dealers

FINANCIAL INFORMATION FORUM 5 Hanover Square New York, New York 10004

VEDDERPRICE Chicago New York Washington, DC London San Francisco Los Angeles. FATCA for Private Funds: Key Considerations

ANNEX 8A SCHEDULE OF THE UNITED STATES. Atomic Energy. Sector: Obligations Concerned: National Treatment (Articles 8.3 and 15.

IRAN SANCTIONS ECONOMIC RIGHTS TOOLKIT

International ACH IAT and the Corporate Practitioner

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICES

Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Amendments 1

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE WASHINGTON, D.C

Packet Contents. Page 1 of 9

PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

Simplified Instructions for Completing a Form W-8BEN-E

Department of the Treasury

CHARTER OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONAL OVERALL MISSION

FATCA Frequently Asked Questions

FOUNTAIN HOUSE CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND DISCLOSURE POLICY

U.S. Export Controls E X T R A T E R R I T O R I A L I T Y - T H E L O N G A R M O F U. S. L A W. P e t e r W. K l e s t a d t M a y 8,

General Instructions for Preparation of the Annual Report of Foreign Banking Organizations FR Y-7

Head Start Reauthorization

International Trade Alert

NETGEAR, INC. CODE OF BUSINESS ETHICS AND CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY FOR DIRECTORS, OFFICERS AND KEY EMPLOYEES

COMMENTARY. Through Rule 15a-6 FAQs JONES DAY

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING. between the. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. and the. Office of Foreign Assets Control

Session of HOUSE BILL No By Committee on Taxation 2-10

Form 13H Filing Considerations for Investment Managers. September 27, 2011

Alert Memo. US Enacts Additional Iran-Related Sanctions; OFAC Amends Iranian Sanctions Regulations to Cover Entities Owned by US Persons

What s covered? An analysis of university travel policies and implications for campus leadership

HALOGEN SOFTWARE INC. HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE CHARTER

NYSE Listed Company Manual Section 303A Corporate Governance Standards Frequently Asked Questions

CHARTER FOR THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS SIGMA DESIGNS, INC. (As adopted by the Board of Directors effective as of May 2010)

ULTRA CLEAN HOLDINGS, INC. a Delaware corporation (the Company ) Corporate Governance Guidelines As Amended and Restated on February 8, 2012

Protecting the Value of Your Transaction y

DEVELOPING AN AML (ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING) PROGRAM:

How To Choose The Right Form Of Joint Venture

Middle Tennessee State University. Office of Research Services

Action: Notice of an application under section 6(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940

Consolidated Financial Statements

Understanding the Brown Act & Conflict of Interest Laws

IMMUNOGEN, INC. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

FINRA PROPOSES LIGHTER REGULATORY REGIME FOR LIMITED CORPORATE FINANCING BROKERS

Global Stock Options Survey. Gide Loyrette Nouel A.A.R.P.I. France

United States Tax Alert

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 182 / Monday, September 21, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

The Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 ( CFMA ) 1 eliminated a longstanding

8 Guiding Principles for Anti-Money Laundering Polciies and Procedures in

Transcription:

1 Client Update OFAC Provides Additional Iran Sanctions Guidance WASHINGTON, D.C. Satish M. Kini smkini@debevoise.com Robert T. Dura rdura@debevoise.com NEW YORK Carl Micarelli cmicarelli@debevoise.com David Sewell dgsewell@debevoise.com Zila Reyes Acosta-Grimes zracosta@debevoise.com On June 8, 2016, the U.S. Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control ("OFAC") added 11 new questions and answers to its Frequently Asked Questions ("FAQs") regarding the scope of U.S. sanctions on Iran after the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, under which Iran agreed to limit its nuclear program in exchange for certain sanctions relief. 1 A number of the FAQs seek to clarify the scope of Iran General License H ( GL H ), which authorizes foreign entities owned or controlled by U.S. persons to engage in certain Iran-related activities, and to outline how U.S. persons who sit on the boards or serve as senior managers of non-u.s., non-iranian entities should conduct themselves. Below, we summarize the key points highlighted in these FAQs. We have reproduced all of the new FAQs in an Appendix for ease of reference. Correspondent Accounts for Third-Country Banks. The updated FAQs clarify that U.S. financial institutions may transact with non-u.s., non-iranian financial institutions that conduct business with Iranian financial institutions not found on the Specially Designated Nationals List. U.S. financial institutions, however, remain prohibited from processing Iranrelated transactions for foreign financial institutions. Clarifications to the Scope of General License H. A number of the FAQs provide clarifications on the scope of GL H. One FAQ notes that GL H authorizes U.S.-owned or -controlled foreign entities to engage in transactions with individuals or entities identified as controlled by the Government of Iran and found on the Executive Order 13599 List. Another FAQ explains that U.S. parent companies and U.S.-owned or -controlled 1 For more information on the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, please see our Client Update of January 19, 2016, available at http:///thesanctionsresource.

2 foreign entities may alter their policies and procedures to allow the foreign entity to establish a physical presence inside Iran. Determination of When a Foreign Company Is Owned or Controlled by a U.S. Person for Purposes of GL H. In one of the new FAQs, OFAC clarifies that an entity established or maintained outside the United States is generally considered owned or controlled by a U.S. person (for purposes of GL H) if, in the aggregate, one or more U.S. persons hold 50% or greater equity interest by vote or value in the entity or if one or more U.S. persons hold a majority of seats on the entity s board. OFAC would not, however, regard a non-u.s. company that is publicly traded or whose ownership interests are widely dispersed to be owned or controlled by a U.S. person merely because U.S. persons, in the aggregate, passively hold more than 50 percent of the shares of such entity but no one U.S. person holds a controlling share in the company. U.S. Persons Serving on the Board or in a Senior Management Capacity of a Non- U.S., Non-Iranian Entity. The FAQs affirm that U.S. persons may serve on the board or as a senior manager of a non-u.s., non-iranian entity, even if the entity transacts with Iranian persons that are not on the SDN List. U.S. persons generally must be walled off or ring-fenced from Iran-related business, and OFAC recommends that such institutions consider instituting a blanket recusal policy (as opposed to relying on case-by-case abstentions) to segregate U.S. persons from Iran-related business. This generally confirms what many companies have regarded as best practices for avoiding U.S. director and officer involvement with Iran-related transactions. * * * For e-mail updates on sanctions developments, please subscribe to the Debevoise & Plimpton Sanctions Alert, a monthly summary of developments in economic and trade sanctions. To subscribe, please e-mail sanctions@debevoise.com or sign up at the Insights Subscribe Page on our website. The Firm s sanctions-related publications may also be found at The Sanctions Resource page on our website. Please do not hesitate to contact us with any questions.

3 APPENDIX C. FINANCIAL AND BANKING MEASURES C. 15. Can U.S. financial institutions transact with, including by opening or maintaining correspondent accounts for, non-u.s., non-iranian financial institutions that maintain correspondent banking relationships with Iranian financial institutions that are not on the SDN List? Yes. U.S. financial institutions can transact with, including by opening or maintaining correspondent accounts for, non-u.s., non-iranian financial institutions that maintain correspondent banking relationships or otherwise transact with Iranian financial institutions that are not on the SDN List. It remains prohibited, however, for non-u.s. financial institutions to route Iranrelated transactions through U.S. financial institutions or involve U.S. persons in such transactions, unless the transactions are exempt from regulation or authorized by OFAC. Non-U.S., non-iranian financial institutions should have appropriate systems and controls to ensure that they do not route Iran-related transactions through U.S. financial institutions, unless the transactions are exempt from regulation or authorized by OFAC. C. 16. Can a non-u.s., non-iranian entity (including a non-u.s., non-iranian financial institution) engage in transactions with Iranian persons not on the SDN List even though one or more U.S. persons serve on that entity s Board of Directors or as senior managers (e.g., Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Compliance Officer)? Must these U.S. persons be recused or walled off from the entity s Iran-related business? The presence of one or more U.S. persons on the Board of Directors or serving as a senior manager of a non-u.s., non-iranian entity does not necessarily preclude that entity from transacting with Iranian persons that are not on the SDN List. Unless authorized by OFAC, however, U.S. persons must be walled off or ringfenced from Iran-related business because, with limited exceptions, U.S. persons continue to be broadly prohibited from engaging in or facilitating transactions or dealings with Iran or its government. The prohibitions on the exportation or reexportation of services to Iran and facilitation have been in place for decades, and are consistent with prohibitions applied across a range of U.S. sanctions programs administered by OFAC. Non-U.S., non-iranian entities establishing policies regarding how to wall off the U.S. persons from the institution s Iran-related business should consider instituting a blanket recusal policy (as opposed to case-by-case abstentions,

4 which, depending on the facts and circumstances, could be considered a prohibited facilitation and/or export of services under the ITSR) for U.S. person directors, senior managers and other employees with respect to Iran-related matters. The institution of a blanket recusal policy requiring that all U.S. person employees of a non-u.s., non-iranian entity not be involved in Iran-related activities would not be considered prohibited activity under the ITSR. In instances where national laws prohibit the recusal of a U.S. person executive from the decision-making processes of his or her non-u.s. employer, including those involving Iran-related business, the executive or employer should consult with their counsel and/or approach OFAC for additional guidance. K. FOREIGN ENTITIES OWNED OR CONTROLLED BY U.S. PERSONS K. 14. Does GL H authorize a U.S. person to alter its policies and procedures, or the policies or procedures of its owned or controlled foreign entity, to allow the U.S.-owned or -controlled foreign entity to establish a physical presence inside Iran? Yes. GL H authorizes a U.S. parent to alter its policies and procedures, and/or the policies and procedures of its owned or controlled foreign entity, to allow the U.S.-owned or -controlled foreign entity to establish a physical presence inside Iran. U.S.-owned or -controlled foreign entities, however, continue to be prohibited from the exportation, reexportation, sale or supply, directly or indirectly, from the United States of any goods, technology or services if the items are destined for Iran or the Government of Iran at the time they leave the United States (see FAQs K.13 and M.9). K. 15. Are U.S.-owned or -controlled foreign entities considered U.S. persons? No. The term United States person or U.S. person, as it is defined in section 560.314 of the ITSR, means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States. Although U.S.-owned or -controlled entities are subject to the prohibitions of the ITSR pursuant to section 560.215 (and eligible for the authorizations of GL H), they are not considered U.S. persons under the ITSR. K. 16. Does GL H authorize U.S.-owned or -controlled foreign entities to engage in transactions with individuals and entities on the E.O. 13599 list? Yes. GL H authorizes U.S.-owned or -controlled foreign entities to engage in

5 transactions with individuals and entities on the E.O. 13599 List that are within the scope of the general license (see FAQ I.2 for additional information on the E.O. 13599 List). K. 17. Does OFAC aggregate the interests of multiple U.S. persons in determining whether an entity established or maintained outside the United States is a U.S.-owned or -controlled foreign entity for purposes of GL H and section 560.215 of the ITSR? Yes, with certain exceptions. As a general matter, an entity established or maintained outside the United States is considered owned or controlled by a U.S. person if, in the aggregate, one or more U.S. persons hold(s) a 50 percent or greater equity interest by vote or value in the entity or if one or more U.S. persons hold(s) a majority of seats on the board of directors of the entity. A determination as to whether one or more U.S. persons otherwise control(s) the actions, policies or personnel decisions of a foreign entity is a fact-specific, caseby-case determination, but in making such a determination, OFAC would look to the aggregated ownership interests held, and indicia of control exercised, by all relevant U.S. persons. In the specific case of companies organized under the laws of a country other than the United States that are publicly traded or where ownership interests are otherwise widely dispersed, OFAC would not regard such an entity to be owned or controlled by a U.S. person if U.S. persons, in the aggregate, passively hold more than 50 percent of the shares of such entity but no one U.S. person holds a controlling share in the company. However, such a company could still be considered a U.S.-owned or -controlled foreign entity to the extent one or more of the other criteria for ownership or control are met. K. 18. In cases where multiple U.S. persons, in the aggregate, own or control a foreign entity, are U.S. persons authorized under GL H to amend the policies and procedures of stakeholding U.S. companies and the policies and procedures of the U.S.-owned or -controlled foreign entity? Yes. In cases where U.S. persons, in the aggregate, own or control a foreign entity, U.S. persons are permitted to amend the policies and procedures of U.S. entities that own a portion of the U.S.-owned or -controlled foreign entity, as well as the policies and procedures of the U.S.-owned or -controlled foreign entity, to the extent necessary to allow the U.S.-owned or -controlled foreign entity to engage in transactions with Iran that are authorized under GL H (see FAQ K.6 for additional details on the extent to which U.S. persons can engage in altering policies and procedures related to transactions with Iran).

6 K. 19. Does GL H authorize a U.S. person to establish or alter the operating policies and procedures of a United States entity or a U.S.-owned or -controlled foreign entity more than once? Yes. A U.S. person can undertake additional changes to such operating policies and procedures so long as the changes are not with respect to, or for the purpose of facilitating, any particular Iran-related transaction(s) by the U.S.-owned or -controlled foreign entity. K. 20. Must U.S. persons employed by or serving on the Board of Directors of a U.S.-owned or -controlled foreign entity be recused or walled off from all Iran-related business of that entity? Can U.S. person employees simply abstain from voting on Iran-related matters? In general, unless authorized by OFAC, U.S. persons employed by or serving on the board of directors of a U.S.-owned or -controlled foreign entity (or any other foreign entity) must be recused or walled off from all Iran-related business of that entity, except for certain limited activities with respect to Iran that are authorized under section (a) of that GL (see FAQs K.8 and K.9). U.S. persons are authorized under GL H to allow for such a recusal through the establishment or alteration of policies and procedures of their owned or controlled foreign entities. U.S.-owned or -controlled foreign entities (and other foreign entities) should consider instituting a blanket recusal policy (as opposed to case-by-case abstentions, which, depending on the facts and circumstances, could be considered a prohibited facilitation and/or export of services under the ITSR) for U.S. person directors, managers and other employees with respect to Iran-related matters (see FAQ C.16). K. 21. Must the U.S. parent company of a U.S.-owned or -controlled foreign entity engaging in transactions with Iran pursuant to GL H remove itself from all day-to-day operations of its owned or controlled foreign entity, or just those related to Iran? If a U.S. parent company s owned or controlled foreign entity engages in transactions with Iran pursuant to GL H, and also conducts transactions with other non-sanctioned jurisdictions, the U.S. parent company and its board members, senior management and employees may continue to be involved in the U.S.-owned or -controlled foreign entity s day-to-day operations with nonsanctioned jurisdictions. K. 22. Can a U.S. person receive reports from its owned or controlled foreign entities that detail transactions conducted pursuant to GL H, including

7 reporting on transactions that the U.S. person is required to disclose to the Securities and Exchange Commission? Yes. A U.S. person may receive reports from its owned or controlled foreign entities that include details on transactions the foreign entity conducted with Iran pursuant to GL H. However, U.S. persons remain prohibited from engaging in Iran-related activities of U.S.-owned or -controlled foreign entities and cannot attempt to influence Iran-related business decisions of such entities based on such reports.