ORDINANCE NO. 14-01 ESTACADA RURAL FIRE DISTRICT NO. 69 DESIRE TO SERVE, COURAGE TO ACT



Similar documents
Chapter 5.56 EMERGENCY ALARM SYSTEMS

KALAMAZOO COUNTY, MICHIGAN

DRAFT CITY/COUNTY OF, TENNESSEE POLICE ALARM ORDINANCE

Alarms. Chapter 27 ALARMS. Definitions. Police Alarm System. Alarm System Requirements Alarm System Inspections Alarm Agent Permits

DRAFT CITY/COUNTY OF, STATE POLICE ALARM ORDINANCE

How To Regulate A Nuisance Fire And Medical Alarm System

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF WILLMAR, MINNESOTA AMENDING WILLMAR CODE CHAPTER 8, LICENSES, PERMITS AND BUSINESS REGULATIONS

ORDINANCE NO. PAGE 1 TOWN OF FLOWER MOUND, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO.

Madison Police Department

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER 3-1 REGARDING FALSE ALARMS.

ORDINANCE NO The City Council of the City of Los Banos does ordain as follows:

ARTICLE II. - FIRE AND SECURITY ALARMS [7]

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF MISSISSAUGA FIRE & EMERGENCY SERVICES FEES AND CHARGES BY-LAW

Chapter 5.58 SECURITY ALARM SYSTEMS

other legitimate calls for service and create a drain on available resources; and

ORDINANCE RELATIVE TO FALSE ALARMS

Mansfield False Alarm Reduction Program Ordinance

Chapter ALARM SYSTEMS. Sec Intent and purpose of chapter. Sec Definitions. Page 1 FOOTNOTE(S):

MECKLENBURG COUNTY FALSE ALARM ORDINANCE. SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS Page 2-3. SECTION 2. ALARM USER PERMITS REQUIRED Page 3

PINELLAS COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 09-JL

Ordinance Number 642 AN ORDINANCE REGULATING ALARM SYSTEMS IN STEUBEN COUNTY

ARTICLE III. FIRE ALARMS. Sec Purpose. Sec Definitions.

ARTICLE IV: SECURITY ALARM SYSTEMS

Boise Municipal Code. Chapter 6-15 FALSE SECURITY ALARMS

ORDINANCE NO

Article III. EMS/Rescue. Division A. General Provisions.

Chapter 137 RECOVERY OF COSTS OF EMERGENCY RESPONSES *

Miami-Dade Police Department Burglar Alarm Ordinance

ORDINANCE 1090 SECURITY ALARMS OF BUSINESSES AND HOMES

ORDINANCE NO

TOWNSHIP COUNCIL OF MOUNT HOLLY TOWNSHIP BURLINGTON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY ORDINANCE NO

EMERGENCY SERVICES CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS AND THE WILLIAMSON COUNTY SERVICES DISTRICT #8 (Amended September, 2010)

ORDINANCE NO AMENDING THE SAN MATEO MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD CHAPTER 7.46 REGARDING MEDICAL MARIJUANA COLLECTIVES REGULATIONS

Incorp~~~ t~d 1925 ORDINANCE CHAPTER 9, CODE OF ORDINANCES IN ITS ENTIRETY; CREATING AND ADOPTING A NEW ARTICLE II OF REQUIREMENTS FOR

ORDINANCE NUMBER 3325 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL AMENDING CHAPTER OF THE MISSOULA MUNICIPAL CODE ENTITLED "ALARM SYSTEMS"

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRISCO, TEXAS, THAT:

BOOK 101 PAGE 2fi8. OF TILLAMOOK COUNTY, OREGON JUNE WAGNEfi. The Board of Commissioners for Tillamook County, Oregon

Sec Certificates of use.

The Clean Up of Clandestine Drug Lab Sites in Minnesota

Ordinance Number 564 Page 2

Campbell County Emergency Medical Services Advisory Committee Agenda

INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR LIBRARY SERVICES

How To Enforce An Ordinance On False Alarms

TOWN OF CHINCOTEAGUE, VA. ORDINANCE No. August 3, 2015 AN ORDINANCE REGULATING ALARM SYSTEMS IN THE

An ordinance amending Chapter 4 ½ of the City of New Haven s code relating to burglary and robbery alarm systems.

ORDINANCE CITY OF NEW ORLEANS COUNCILMEMBERS WILLIAMS, HEAD, BROSSETT, CANTRELL AND GUIDRY (BY REQUEST)

GENERAL ORDINANCE NO

BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of Aldermen of the City of Winston-Salem, as follows:

Section Emergency Water Shortage Regulations and Staged Water Use Reduction Plan Section Scope and Purpose

BYLAW BEING A BYLAW OF THE TOWN OF OKOTOKS IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA FOR THE PURPOSE OF REDUCING FALSE ALARMS

Trumbull Municipal Code Sec False alarm abatement.

Section 2. A new Chapter 8.38 is hereby added to Title 8 of the Brea City Code to read as follows: CHAPTER 8.38: REGULATION OF ALARM SYSTEMS

Kitsap Public Health Board Ordinance Food Service Regulations

ALARM BUSINESSES. Chapter 129 ALARM BUSINESSES

BILL NO. ORDINANCE NO.

ROCKBRIDGE COUNTY CODE. Chapter 14 FIRE, EMS AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ARTICLE I. FIRE AND EMS DEPARTMENT

ESA MODEL FIRE ALARM ORDINANCE GOVERNING ALARMS RESPONDED TO BY FIRE OFFICIALS

MONTGOMERY COUNTY ALARMS RULES GOVERNING ALARMS RESPONDED TO BY LAW ENFORCEMENT SECTION 1. PURPOSE SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS

Chapter 3.26 CAR RENTAL OCCUPATION TAX

O: Ordinance in its entirety and replacing it with the foregoing Ordinance outlined

FALSE SECURITY OR MEDICAL ALARM ORDINANCE Baroda Township Ordinance No. 30

ORDINANCE NO. 2OO8-12

Chapter 72 ALARMS. [HISTORY: Adopted by the Town Board of the Town of Summit as indicated in article histories. Amendments noted where applicable.

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF SANDPOINT TITLE: AGREEMENT WITH BONNER COUNTY FOR EMERGENCY AND NON- EMERGENCY MEDICAL TRANSPORT SERVICES

INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR CONSULTING AGREEMENT INSTRUCTIONS, ROUTING AND APPROVAL COVER SHEET

The language set forth in this Ordinance shall be interpreted in accordance with the following rules of construction:

TITLE VIII EMERGENCY RESPONSES CHAPTER 81: RICHMOND FIRE DEPARTMENT RESPONSES TO MOTOR-VEHICLE ACCIDENTS

Sec ALARMS AND FALSE ALARMS. Sec DEFINITIONS.

KANABEC COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 30

BILL NO. B ORDINANCE NO TOWNSHIP OF O HARA ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR FIRE PREVENTION INSPECTIONS AND REVIEWS WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE OSWEGO FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT

A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 22, KAUAI COUNTY CODE 1987, AS AMENDED, BY ESTABLISHING A NEW ARTICLE RELATING TO ALARM SYSTEMS

I. PREAMBLE: III. DEFINITIONS:

ORDINANCE NO

PART II MUNICIPAL CODE Chapter 4 ALARM SYSTEMS AND PRIVATE SECURITY FIRMS ARTICLE II. ALARMS

The Basic Curfew Ordinance The Non-Addition Rule The Additional Curfew Hour The Noisier Jet Phase Out

CITY OF LYNN In City Council

TOWN OF SIDNEY BYLAW NO A BYLAW TO REGULATE THE USE AND POSSESSION OF SECURITY ALARM SYSTEMS IN THE TOWN OF SIDNEY

MASTER ROAD REPAIR AGREEMENT STATE OF TEXAS KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF HOOD

AN ORDINANCE REGULATING AMBULANCE SERVICE AND GRANTING OF FRANCHISES TO AMBULANCE OPERATORS COUNTY OF CHOWAN

BOROUGH OF MIDDLESEX ORDINANCE NO

ALARM SYSTEMS INFORMATION & REQUIREMENTS

NORTHEAST OHIO NETWORK FOR EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY SERVICE PROVIDER CONTRACT INTERNET SERVICE Contract Number:

Chapter No. 93 ] PRIVATE ACTS, CHAPTER NO. 93 HOUSE BILL NO By Representative Sands. Substituted for: Senate Bill No.

ARTICLE 8 FIRE ALARMS PURPOSE FINDINGS DEFINITIONS STANDARDS AND ADMINISTRATION

ORDINANCE NO

CHAPTER 4. Regulation of Private Alarm Systems

AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A SCHEDULE OF FINES FOR FALSE FIRE ALARMS. WHEREAS, the North Aurora Fire Protection District is a fire protection district

SARASOTA COUNTY GOVERNMENT HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAM CONTRACT

ALARM SYSTEM REGULATIONS. BE IT ENACTED by the County Legislature of the County of Cattaraugus as follows:

Town of Dover Fire and CO Alarm System Ordinance

CHAPTER OPERATION OF COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL ALARM SYSTEMS

ORDINANCE NO. Introduction (CM)


CITY OF ST. HELENA PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1480 MAIN STREET- ST. HELENA, CA PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 15, 2015

ALARM ORDINANCE. (b)alarm permit means a permit issued by the Town allowing the operation of an alarm system within the Town.

CROSS CREEK TOWNSHIP WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION

25',1$1&( 12. :+(5($6 there are a growing number of alarm systems being installed in residential and business establishments within the City; and

FIRE & RESCUE ORDINANCE TOWNSHIP OF GRAND HAVEN, MICHIGAN ord. no. 185 eff. Aug. 1, 1993

Transcription:

ESTACADA RURAL FIRE DISTRICT NO. 69 DESIRE TO SERVE, COURAGE TO ACT ORDINANCE NO. 14-01 AN ORDINANCE ENABLING ESTACADA RURAL FIRE DISTRICT NO. 69, A RURAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, TO RECOVER COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE DELIVERY OF SERVICES. Whereas, the Board of Directors, hereinafter referred to as the Board, of Estacada Rural Fire District No. 69, hereinafter referred to as the District, being aware of the need to develop adequate policies and regulations that enable the District to recover costs for services provided by District personnel; and Whereas, the District occasionally is asked to respond outside its boundaries to provide public safety services to unprotected or inadequately protected areas; and Whereas, the District may respond to catastrophic events on transportation routes which could create considerable cost burden upon the district taxpayers; and Whereas, the District can use service cost recovery as a financial disincentive to encourage individuals and business owners to correct fire code violations and limit the unnecessary impact on District response and enforcement resources; and Whereas, the District pursuant to ORS 478.410, has the statutory authority to adopt ordinances creating a fee for identified services provided by the district; and Whereas, a fee created under ORS 478.410 may not exceed the cost to the District of providing the service; and Whereas, the District pursuant to ORS 478.965, has the statutory authority to recover costs of suppressing unlawful fires; and Whereas, the District pursuant to ORS 476.290 has the statutory authority to recover costs of fire suppression in unprotected areas and for responses outside its boundaries pursuant to ORS 478.310; and Whereas, fees and charges imposed by this resolution are not taxes subject to property tax limitations of Article XI, Section 11(b) of the Oregon Constitution; and Whereas, after investigation and consideration, the Board is of the opinion and belief that it is appropriate to recover the costs of providing service by District personnel. The District finds it necessary to adopt the following policy; therefore: Cost Recovery Ordinance 1

THE DISTRICT DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I - PURPOSE The purpose of this ordinance is to recover the costs of providing service in those limited instances deemed appropriate by direction of Board policy, as set out in Section V. to establish a system of cost-recovery which recognizes the District s costs for providing services and attempts to recover those costs through a practical billing structure; to establish and maintain a plan for identifying those entities, (either persons, forprofit or not-for-profit businesses, governmental units, or other organizations) from whom costs should be recovered; to create economic disincentives for unnecessary impact upon District resources; to protect the District from financial burden in the event of major incidents requiring considerable District resources. SECTION II DUTIES AND POWERS A. The regulations adopted as part of this ordinance shall be enforced by the Fire Chief of the District who shall have the authority to determine whether and how much to recover from those requiring services. B. The Board adopts as part of this ordinance the fee schedule in Appendix A hereto, which outlines typical fees and methods of cost recovery calculation for each approved service. C. This ordinance as hereby adopted, shall be filed in the record of the District. This ordinance is the Cost Recovery Policy, hereinafter referred to as the Cost Recovery Policy of ESTACADA RURAL FIRE DISTRICT NO. 69, is adopted pursuant to ORS 478.965 and 478.410. SECTION III - DEFINITIONS FIRE DISTRICT or DISTRICT. ESTACADA RURAL FIRE DISTRICT NO. 69. BOARD of DIRECTORS or BOARD. The Board of Directors of ESTACADA RURAL FIRE DISTRICT NO. 69. FIRE CHIEF. The Fire Chief of ESTACADA RURAL FIRE DISTRICT NO. 69 or a duly authorized representative. RESPONSE. An apparatus dispatched to a location and the officer acknowledges enroute with dispatch. Cancelled en-route incidents are considered billable events since the apparatus was deployed and thus an incident report must be generated. TRANSPORTATION ROUTE. A roadway, waterway, or railroad right-of-way or airplane route. Cost Recovery Ordinance 2

UNPROTECTED or INADEQUATELY PROTECTED AREAS. A territory outside the boundaries of ESTACADA RURAL FIRE DISTRICT NO. 69 which is unprotected or inadequately protected by public safety services. SECTION IV - APPEALS Appeals by either persons for-profit or not-for-profit businesses, governmental units, or other organizations shall be presented to the Fire Chief in writing within 30 days from the date of the invoice being received. The decision of the Fire Chief with respect to any such appeal shall be final and binding. SECTION V COST RECOVERY FEES The Fire Chief, or his or her designee, shall be responsible for reviewing all cost recovery invoices and determining whether and how much to recover from those requiring services. The Fire Chief may, at his or her discretion, waive fees and other rules and determine if extenuating circumstances allow waiving cost recovery invoicing in a particular instance. Transportation Route Responses Cost recovery fees may be imposed for responses to incidents on or related to transportation routes. Transportation route incidents include but are not limited to incidents occurring on roadways, railway right-a-ways, aircraft routes, and waterways. Unprotected or Inadequately Protected Areas Cost recovery fees may be imposed for any service provided in unprotected or inadequately protected areas outside of ESTACADA RURAL FIRE DISTRICT NO. 69 boundaries. Fire Code Enforcement Cost recovery fees may be imposed for re-inspections of occupancies. Cost recovery enforcement fees will not be imposed for the initial fire and life safety occupancy inspection or the first subsequent re-inspection for identified fire code violations. The second re-inspection (third visit to occupancy) and all subsequent re-inspections for previously noted fire code violations will result in cost recovery enforcement fees being imposed. Automatic Monitored Fire and Medical Alarm Responses Cost recovery fees may be imposed for repetitive false (nuisance) responses to fire and medical alarms. No cost recovery fee will be imposed for the initial three (3) fire alarm or medical responses to any residential or commercial occupancy during a calendar year. No cost recovery fee will be charged if the fire alarm is a result of a fire. No cost recovery fee will be charged if the medical alarm results in medical treatment by EMS personnel. Cost Recovery Ordinance 3

Open Burning Violation Responses Cost recovery fees may be imposed for any response to open burning violations or to any other unlawful fire. Fees and Charges: Fees for service will be limited to cost recovery. Methods of calculating the cost of services shall be identified and generally based upon the average cost of providing the service unless otherwise stated. The Fire District will calculate fees for service for specific responses when the response lasts longer than 30 minutes. Cost calculations will include direct costs (apparatus, personnel, and any miscellaneous supplies and services) and indirect costs (administrative overhead). Cost calculation methodology will be made available upon request. Invoices will be addressed to the registered property owner, responsible party contacted at the scene, or occupant as decided by the Fire Chief or his designee. SECTION VI COLLECTION PROCEDURES Fees will normally be billed within sixty (60) days of the service delivery date. If arrangements for payment are not made within sixty (60) days of billing, the invoice will be considered delinquent and the District will proceed with collections as deemed appropriate by the Fire Chief. All costs related to collection procedures shall be added in addition to Fire District invoiced fees when collection services are required. SECTION VII - SEVERABILITY AND VALIDITY If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance or codes or standards herein referenced is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The Board hereby declares that it would have passed all other portions of this ordinance irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses and phrases is declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION VIII - DATE OF EFFECT This Ordinance shall be effective the 30 th day following its second reading and adoption by majority vote of the Board of Directors pursuant to ORS 198.550 (1) and (2) This Ordinance was read during a regular meeting of the Board of Directors on the 16 th day of October, 2014. This Ordinance was re-read during a regular meeting of the Board of Directors on the 20 th day of November, 2014, and adopted by the affirmative vote of a majority of the Board of Directors of Estacada Rural Fire District No. 69. BY: ATTEST: President Barry Jennings Secretary/Treasurer John Bresko Cost Recovery Ordinance 4

ESTACADA RURAL FIRE DISTIRCT NO. 69 (ERFD) COST RECOVERY ORDINANCE FEE SCHEDULE - APPENDIX A Cost calculations will include direct costs (apparatus, personnel, and any miscellaneous supplies and services) and indirect costs (administrative costs and overhead). Cost recovery calculation methodology for specific responses will be provided upon request. The Office of State Fire Marshal has established a standardized schedule of costs associated for apparatus and response (OAR 837-130 & Conflagration Act). This model will be used, when applicable, to guide the establishment of costs associated with apparatus usage. All responses billed under these rules are subject to a 30-minute minimum response charge. Apparatus Costs Fire Engine $ 100.00 per hour Fire Truck $ 150.00 per hour Brush Unit $ 60.00 per hour Water Tender $ 70.00 per hour Water Rescue $ 45.00 per hour, includes raft and tow vehicle Rescue $ 40.00 per hour Rehab/Support Vehicle $ 20.00 per hour Command Vehicle $ 15.00 per hour Staff Vehicle Trip Charge $ 15.00 per trip Personnel Costs Average loaded rates Suppression Personnel $ 41.00 per hour per person Command Personnel $ 72.00 per hour per person Inspection Personnel $ 43.00 per hour per person Administrative Staff $ 30.00 per hour per person Volunteer Personnel $ 15.00 per hour per person Note: If overtime is necessary, staffing costs will be billed at 1.5 times the above rates for individuals on overtime. The on-scene officer in charge or duty officer shall complete the billing worksheet for alarms meeting the criteria in this policy. Miscellaneous Supplies and Services Disposable supplies used will be billed on specific usage and cost of replacement. Costs of outside vendors or services used will be billed without mark-up. Other expenses directly related to service delivery. Administrative Costs and Overhead There will be a $40.00 minimum charge per processed invoice. Transportation Route Responses Transportation route responses will be billed using dispatch time records to determine the commitment of apparatus and personnel. Miscellaneous supplies and services, if applicable, will be based upon scene documentation by the officer in charge. Cost Recovery Ordinance 5

Response to Unprotected Areas Responses to unprotected areas will be billed on a per hour basis using dispatch time records to determine commitment of apparatus and personnel. Miscellaneous supplies and services, if applicable, will be based upon scene documentation of the officer in charge. Automatic Monitored Fire and Medical Responses Nuisance automatic fire and medical alarm responses will be billed on a flat fee basis. The minimum fee shall be $125.00 which includes the first 30 minutes of apparatus and staff time. Responses requiring multiple units and/or lasting longer than 30 minutes may be billed using the established hourly rates for all apparatus and staff committed to the alarm. Open Burning Violation Responses Open burning violation responses will be billed on a flat fee basis. The minimum $125.00 fee includes the first 30 minutes of apparatus and staff time. Responses requiring multiple units, lasting longer than 30 minutes, or requiring additional site visits may be billed using established hourly rates for all apparatus and staff committed to the alarm. Extenuating Circumstances Billing exceptions The final decision of whether or not to send a bill for services rests with the fire chief or his/her designee. The officer in charge responding to one of the above situations shall identify if they believe there are extenuating circumstances and if there is justification that the party involved not receive a bill for service. Circumstance may include but are not limited to the following: Transportation incident and a party involved is a District resident What appears to be a minor and non-repetitive case of unauthorized burning with a cooperative party. Indigent or impoverished condition. ERFD is cancelled prior to arrival, or scene time is less than 15 minutes. Mutual aid where ERFD is not the primary responder or the only agency on scene. Billing for mutual aid responses will only occur as outlined in the Clackamas County Mutual Aid Agreement. Family members or friends of ERFD personnel will not be treated as an exception unless, like any other citizen, they meet one of the above categories. Fire Code Enforcement Fees If multiple re-inspections are necessary during fire code enforcement activities, these reinspections will be billed on a flat fee basis. A $100.00 fee per re-inspection visit will be imposed. If a commercial establishment denies entry of ERFD Fire Code enforcement personnel for inspection purposes, an inspection warrant will be required to proceed. All staff time, trip charges, and other expenses required to obtain the inspection warrant and all subsequent fire inspections to complete the inspection process will be invoiced as cost recovery fees. Occasionally contractors or business owners request a new construction or maintenance inspection after normal business hours. If staff overtime is required, these activities will be billed using a two-hour minimum at $100.00 per hour per staff member. This fee will include all trip charges. Cost Recovery Ordinance 6

Estacada Rural Fire District No. 69 Billing Worksheet (example) Alarm date: Alarm Type: Alarm Number: Location: Units on Scene: General description of services provided and supplies used: Party #1 Name: Driver s License #: Home address: Party #2 Name: Driver s License #: Home address: Party #3 Name: Driver s License #: Home address: Party #4 Name: Driver s License #: Home address: Billing exception recommended based on: (Circle if appropriate) 1. Transportation route incident and party involved is a District resident 2. What appears to be a minor and non-repetitive case of unauthorized burning with a cooperative party. Document with a burning violation report to track repeat incidents 3. Indigent or impoverished condition 4. ERFD is cancelled prior to or immediately upon arrival. Note: Scene assessment is a service unless # 5 applies 5. Scene time of less than 15 minutes 6. Mutual aid where ERFD is not the primary responder or the only agency on scene. Residents of ERFD or the district being served will not be billed. 7. Other: Officer s signature: Date: Cost Recovery Ordinance 7