How To Know If Online Courses Work For Middle And High School Students



Similar documents
Online Teachers: What Can SREB States Do to Ensure Competence and Quality?

Essential Principles of High-Quality Online Teaching:

Overcoming Doubts About Online Learning

Standards for Quality Online Courses Educational Technology Cooperative

Standards for Online Professional Development

Online Teaching Evaluation for State Virtual Schools

Active and Collaborative Learning through a Blog Network

Spring 2013 Structured Learning Assistance (SLA) Program Evaluation Results

The MetLife Survey of

Response Rates in Online Teaching Evaluation Systems

UW Colleges Student Motivations and Perceptions About Accelerated Blended Learning. Leanne Doyle

Standards for Quality Online Teaching Educational Technology Cooperative

COURSE AND TEACHER SURVEYS (CATS) AT VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY

Online Courses: An analysis of student satisfaction

Student Perceptions of Online Learning: A Comparison of Two Different Populations

Assessing the quality of online courses from the students' perspective

Aligning Postsecondary Expectations and High School Practice: The Gap Defined

A COMPARISON OF COLLEGE AND HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN AN ONLINE IT FOUNDATIONS COURSE

Effects of small-group teaching in an electrical engineering course

AC : FACULTY PERCEPTIONS AND USE OF A LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AT AN URBAN, RESEARCH INSTITUTION

Intel Teach Essentials Course Instructional Practices and Classroom Use of Technology Survey Report. September Wendy Martin, Simon Shulman

EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP

Higher Performing High Schools

STUDENT SATISFACTION SURVEY SUMMARY

Student Perceptions of Online Courses: Real, Illusory or Discovered.

A Guide To Understanding Your 360- Degree Feedback Results

Best Practices for Online Courses. 100 Quality Indicators for Online Course Design

TEACHING BUSINESS SCHOOL COURSES IN CHINA

Developing Self-Directed Learning Strategy for a Construction Project Management Course

Literacy Design Collaborative and Struggling Readers: A Perfect Match

College- and Career-Readiness Standards Networking Conference. Gaylord Opryland Resort & Convention Center Nashville, Tennessee July 14-16, 2014

Moving from Traditional to Online Instruction: Considerations for Improving Trainer and Instructor Performance

, Discussion Boards, and Synchronous Chat: Comparing Three Modes of Online Collaboration

51473 Strategies for Interactive Notetaking: Study Guide

Education at the Crossroads: Online Teaching and Students' Perspectives on Distance Learning

National C3 Baseline Study: State of Cyberethics, Safety and Security Awareness in US Schools

Constructive student feedback: Online vs. traditional course evaluations. Judy Donovan, Ed.D. Indiana University Northwest

Student Perceptions of Online Homework in Introductory Finance Courses. Abstract

THE CHANGING ROLE OF LIBRARIANS AND

Outcomes of Preservice Teacher s Technology Use

The purpose of this study was to determine what variables Arkansas Tech University

What is independent learning and what are the benefits for students?

Teaching Media Design in an Online Setting: A Needs Assessment

to selection. If you have any questions about these results or In the second half of 2014 we carried out an international

PBS TeacherLine Pre-Survey and Post-Survey Evaluation Report

High Schools That Work

Checklist for Evaluating Online Courses

Research Proposal: ONLINE VERSUS FACE-TO-FACE CLASSROOM: EVALUATING LEARNING EFFECTIVENESS FOR A MASTERS LEVEL INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN COURSE

Communication Process

IDEA. Student Ratings of Instruction Survey Report Fall Guam Community College

Chapter Four: How to Collaborate and Write With Others

How To Determine Teaching Effectiveness

Insights from Today s Student

Student Preferences for Learning College Algebra in a Web Enhanced Environment

Introduction. Two vastly different online experiences were presented in an earlier column. An

Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document.

How To Teach A Sociological Course

New Approaches to Online Accounting Education

Flip Your Classroom to Increase Active Learning and Student Engagement

CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUE EXAMPLES

National Standards of Quality for Online Courses

How To Find Out If Distance Education Is A Good Thing For A Hispanic Student

ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES The roles and responsibilities expected of teachers at each classification level are specified in the Victorian Government

ACT National Curriculum Survey Policy Implications on Preparing for Higher Standards. improve yourself

Online Course Evaluation and Analysis

The move to Moodle: Perspective of academics in a College of Business

Jean Chen, Assistant Director, Office of Institutional Research University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND

Mark J. Quathamer Brevard Community College Quality Enhancement Plan White Paper

AN INVESTIGATION OF THE DEMAND FACTORS FOR ONLINE ACCOUNTING COURSES

Face to face or Cyberspace: Analysis of Course Delivery in a Graduate Educational Research Course

Accounting Department Assessment Report Fall 2000

STUDENT PERCEPTIONS OF INSTRUCTOR INTERACTION IN THE ONLINE ENVIRONMENT

College Teaching Methods & Styles Journal May 2008 Volume 4, Number 5

USING READING IN CONTENT AREA STRATEGIES TO IMPROVE STUDENT UNDERSTANDING IN FAMILY AND CONSUMER SCIENCES

THE NATURE AND CHARACTERISTICS OF ONLINE LEARNING IN ILLINOIS COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES

Policies for Evaluating Faculty: Recommendations for Incorporating Student and Peer Reviews in the Faculty Evaluation Process DRAFT

Transcription:

Do Online Courses Work for Middle Grades and High School Students? Online Students Have Their Say William R. Thomas Can a middle grades or high school student really take a course for credit just by using a computer connected to the Internet? Is the teacher really that important for the student who is taking a course on the Web? Do students taking Web-based courses miss working and interacting with their peers? Parents, educators and policy-makers often ask these questions about the online courses that middle grades and high school students take for academic credit from today s Web-based state virtual schools. In spring 2008, the Southern Regional Education Board asked online students in SREB states for feedback about their experiences through a voluntary, anonymous online questionnaire. The results, reported here, provide insight into what these students think about online courses and what they believe can be done to improve them. More than 2,000 students completed the questionnaire at the end of the 2007-2008 school year. Thirteen of 14 items asked students to indicate their responses using a four-point scale: Strongly Disagree, Disagree, Agree, and Strongly Agree. The last item called for an open-ended short response. The questions asked about three basic elements of online courses that are essential for student success: I. Was the course well designed and were instructional materials available when needed? December 2008 Southern Regional Education Board 592 10th St. N.W. Atlanta, GA 30318 (404) 875-9211 www.sreb.org II. Did the teacher set high academic expectations, support and facilitate student learning? III. Was the student prepared for the online course? In most areas, four out of five students responded positively to key items. (Depending on how each item was worded, a positive response could be either agree or disagree. ) I. Course design and instructional materials: Course organization and registration issues were addressed in three of the items. (See Appendix, Items 1, 2 and 4.) Four of five respondents replied positively to each question. About 6 percent of the students expressed serious concern about how their courses were designed or managed. These results indicate that, overall, students believe their online courses in SREB state virtual schools are well designed and delivered.

II. Teacher expectations and student interactions: The questionnaire explored student perceptions of the role of the teacher in online courses in three items. (See Appendix, Items 3, 5 and 13.) Nearly four of five students reported that their instructors responded promptly to their questions and communicated with them when needed. Nearly three of four agreed that they had opportunities to interact with other students in their online classes and received extra help from the instructor when they needed it. These responses indicate that SREB state virtual schools perform well on two extremely important issues: the relationship lend a helping hand. between student and teacher, and student interaction with peers. Responsiveness on the part of the teacher, in particular, is extremely important to student learning. Research has shown that students do not want to wait long periods of time to receive assistance and support, especially middle grades and high school students working in online courses. In addition, just as traditional schools provide students with academic and social opportunities to interact with their peers, online classes enable them to communicate in a medium with which they are comfortable and often prefer to use. III. Preparation for the online course: Some SREB state virtual schools report that students often say they drop out of online courses because the content is too difficult or because they are not comfortable with the online instructional style. Two items focused on this issue. Two others addressed the reading and writing skills students need to be successful in online courses. (See Appendix, Items 6, 7, 8 and 9.) Most students who completed the survey responded positively to all four questions. My experience in this course has been outstanding. I had the opportunity to meet other students. My instructor was always willing to I came into this course stressing about whether or not I d be able to comprehend this material without a teacher physically there with me. Eighty percent of the students said they were academically I was very surprised at how prepared for the course they took online. This signals that online instructional developers for state virtual schools have organized this course was and paid excellent attention to the issue of student preparation. how helpful the instructor was. For students to be successful in advanced courses such as All you had to do was Algebra II, research has shown that foundation courses follow the lesson plan, study (such as Algebra I) that students may have taken in their and ask specific questions. local schools must be high quality and taught to high standards. While instructional designers have expected some students to be unprepared for the rigors of advanced online courses like Algebra II, they have found that these students also are sometimes not adequately prepared for less advanced online courses as well. This means all courses traditional and online need to be taught to high standards so that students are prepared for courses at the next level. Three out of four students said that they were familiar with the technology tools and software used in online courses. This likely reflects the improvements in technology used for online learning and the increasing level of technology competence of many students and their teachers. 2

Nearly all of the students thought they had the reading skills they needed to be successful in the course. Online courses require significant reading. As the quality of online courses continues to improve, the dependence on text appears to be lessening in favor of other ways of teaching, including demonstrations and simulation. Yet reading will always be the foundation of communication in online courses. Eighty-five percent of the students who responded indicated that their written communication skills were adequate for success in the course. Just as with reading skills, the ability to communicate effectively in writing is essential for online students. Research evidence suggests that online courses promote improvements in student writing skills, likely because students are required to write more in online courses. The course as a whole: Three items addressed the student response to the online course as a whole. (See Appendix, Items 10, 11 and 12.) While still giving a positive response (ranging from 55 percent to 74 percent), students overall provided less positive responses to these items than to others (where responses ranged from 73 percent to 94 percent). Online courses require time-management skills that many assignments. students are learning as they face competing demands on their time. This may be an issue that state virtual schools need to address by adequately informing students about course expectations. At the same time, local schools need to work with students as they sign up for online courses to ensure they are not overcommitted. Items 10 and 12 were designed to identify broader student attitudes and perspectives about online learning courses. Personal attitudes about the course in general are reflected in Item 10. Sixty-eight percent of the students indicated they liked the course. Comments from students in the open-ended responses gave insights both into what they liked about the course and what they found frustrating. Not only did I learn more about computers and how they work I learned more about managing my time and getting my work done. It was a completely new experience for me and, although I can be technologically challenged at times, I was able to manage very well. I would not recommend this type of class to a student who is not an independent learner and does not have sufficient computer skills. The online course taught me how to accurately word my responses when completing Surprisingly, only 59 percent of students responded positively to the statement I will take another online course. What is curious is why roughly 80 percent of students responded positively to so many items apparently not troubled by perceived barriers to learning in online courses. Yet about 12 percentage points fewer (68 percent) indicated they liked the courses they took, and 9 percentage points fewer than that (59 percent) predicted they would take another online course. There is no single answer for this decline in percentages. 3

Some indications can be found in the open-ended responses. For some students, time was an issue: I liked my course, but it took too much time. This response indicates that the course may have been more demanding than anticipated. It likely ties directly to Item 11, in which 55 percent of the students wished they had more time to spend on the course. The only drawback I saw from the online course In addition, one-fifth of the students gave negative responses experience is that it requires to the items on course organization/instructional materials, dedicating a lot of extra time teacher expectations/student interaction or student preparation. Online learning may still be so new that a negative to squeeze another course into our already-tight schedules. reaction to any aspect of a course may be enough to cause a student to avoid online courses in the future. This, obviously, has to do with my personal time Another perhaps more straightforward reason students may have responded as they did is that they did not management, and almost all need another online course. Just prior to taking the survey, the problems I had with the some students took the online course for credit recovery course were caused by this. or to get a specific course they needed that is not available in their school. Some took their first online course in the last semester of high school. In these cases, many did not need to take another online course. These summary responses from online students should be helpful to SREB states as they strive to further improve the quality of their courses and work with online teachers. Providing quality teachers and quality courses to many middle grades and high schools students who would not otherwise have access to these courses is far too important to ignore these responses both positive and negative. State leaders and policy-makers can benefit from the thousands of students who took time to share their perspectives about online learning. 4

APPENDIX Questions Strongly Disagree (A) Disagree (B) Agree (C) Strongly Agree (D) Positive Tabulations A + B or C + D 1. The course was managed and delivered well. 6% 14% 58% 22% 80% 2. Course materials were delivered on time. 6 15 56 23 79 3. My instructor responded promptly to my questions and communicated with me when needed. 8 14 44 34 78 4. The registration procedures were difficult to follow. 21 59 16 4 80 5. I had the opportunity to interact with other students in my online course. 6. I was not academically prepared to take this online course. 7. I had the reading skills needed to be successful in this course. 8. I needed better writing skills to be successful in this course. 9. I was familiar with the online tools and software used in the course. 8 19 53 20 73 33 46 15 6 80 2 4 47 47 94 33 52 12 3 85 5 19 53 23 76 10. I liked this online course. 16 16 42 26 68 11. I wish I had more time to spend on this online course. 11 34 35 20 55 12. I will take another online course. 15 26 40 19 59 13. When I needed extra help, I received it from my instructor. 8 18 51 23 74 This publication was produced by SREB s Educational Technology Cooperative and funded by AT&T. For more information, e-mail bthomas@sreb.org or call (404) 875-9211. 5

(08T05)