The Bolsa Familia Program (BFP)



Similar documents
Brazil s Conditional Cash Transfer Programme Bolsa Família

The recent decline in income inequality in Brazil: magnitude, determinants and consequences. Ricardo Paes de Barros (IPEA)

Brazil: Bolsa Familia Program Scaling-up Cash Transfers for the Poor

CEARA: An Outlook of Social and Economic Indicators

IMPACT EVALUATION OF BOLSA FAMILIA. September 27th, 2005.

Summary. Developing with Jobs

The New Generation of Social Programs in Brazil*

SOCIAL PROTECTION LANDSCAPE IN GHANA. Lawrence Ofori-Addo Deputy Director, Department of Social Welfare LEAP Coordinator Ghana

Session 1.2: What is social protection and what can it do?

Types of Good Practices Focusing on Family Poverty Reduction and Social Exclusion

UNITED NATIONS INDEPENDENT EXPERT ON THE QUESTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND EXTREME POVERTY

Empowerment through decent work and social protection floors

SCREENING CHAPTER 19 SOCIAL POLICY AND EMPLOYMENT AGENDA ITEM : SOCIAL PROTECTION

Harmonization of Health Insurance Schemes in China

The Nuts and Bolts of Brazil s Bolsa Família Program: Implementing Conditional Cash Transfers in a Decentralized Context

1. Introduction. October, By Verónica Silva Villalobos with Gastón Blanco and Lucy Bassett

The Healthcare market in Brazil

IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION AND RESULTS REPORT (IBRD-72340) ON A LOAN IN THE AMOUNT OF US$572.2 MILLION TO THE FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL FOR A

Child poverty: a role for cash transfers in West and Central Africa?

DEMOGRAPHICS AND MACROECONOMICS

NATIONAL BABY FACTS. Infants, Toddlers, and Their Families in the United States THE BASICS ABOUT INFANTS AND TODDLERS

Health Financing in Vietnam: Policy development and impacts

TERMS OF REFERENCE TO DEVELOP THE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM AND PROVIDE TECHNICAL SUPPORT FOR THE CONDITIONAL CASH TRANSFER PROGRAM IN BANGLADESH

RESEARCH NOTES. EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF BRAZIL S BOLSA FAMÍLIA Cash Transfer Programs in Comparative Perspective

The Cypriot Pension System: Adequacy and Sustainability

Energy Access in Brazil

How To Evaluate The Impact Of The Bolsa Fam\U00Edlia Program On Social Inequality In Brazilian Society

How To Fight Hunger In Brazil

Health for All Changing the paradigm of healthcare provision in S. Tomé & Príncipe InstitutoMarquêsde Valle Flôr

Metropolitan Regions in Brazil: sharing a federative governance experience

Inequality in Brazil: measurement, trends, impacts and policies

United Kingdom. Old Age, Disability, and Survivors. United Kingdom. Exchange rate: US$1.00 = 0.64 pounds ( ). Qualifying Conditions

FAMILY-RELATED MEDICAID PROGRAMS FACT SHEET

Study Report. Social Protection in Africa: A Review of Potential Contribution and Impact on Poverty Reduction

TERMS OF REFERENCE INTEGRATED SOCIAL PROTECTION AND LABOUR PROJECT Social Marketing Parenting Consultant

SWK 6061 LECTURE 2 SOCIAL SECURITY: DEFINITION AND CHOICES. Dr. Wong Hung ( 黃 洪 ) Associate Professor, Department of Social Work

Developing Management Information Systems for Social Protection

A Social Protection Floor for all: The UN initiative, the ILO and the South-South dialogue

Paid and Unpaid Labor in Developing Countries: an inequalities in time use approach

Food Security: A Priority for the Inter American Social Protection Network

Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Ministry of Public Health. Contents. Health Financing Policy

SECTOR ASSESSMENT (SUMMARY): EDUCATION 1

How To Get A Medicaid Card

G20 Labour and Employment Ministers Declaration Moscow, July 2013

Colombia. Old Age, Disability, and Survivors. Regulatory Framework. Qualifying Conditions. Coverage. Source of Funds. Colombia

Social protection: A development priority in the post-2015 UN development agenda

Social Protection in ASEAN Policy gaps and common challenges. Cheng Boon Ong 17 November 2014, Bangkok

Consumption Structure Evolutions in an Aging Society and Implications for the Social Security System

Social Security Programs Throughout the World: The Americas, 2007

Rethinking School Feeding EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Social Safety Nets, Child Development, and the Education Sector. Human Development

Health Security for All

Universal Health Care

Social Security in Latin America


Child Health Assurance Program (CHAP)

The Elderly in Africa: Issues and Policy Options. K. Subbarao

The Medium-term Program for Establishing a Sustainable Social Security System and Securing Its Stable Revenue Sources

Economic Growth and Poverty Reduction Strategies in Korea

Evolution of informal employment in the Dominican Republic

IOPS Member country or territory pension system profile: TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO. Update as of 15 February 2013

SOCIAL PROTECTION BRIEFING NOTE SERIES NUMBER 4. Social protection and economic growth in poor countries

PENSIONS POLICY INSTITUTE. Case studies for the Runnymede Trust

Summary of Social Security and Private Employee Benefits HUNGARY

Learning Journey. Banco do Brasil and MAPFRE Insurance Group

Transcription:

The Bolsa Familia Program (BFP) Ministry of Social Development Rio de Janeiro, 13th of June, 2012

BRAZIL Population: 192 million Area: 8.5 million km² 26 states, the Federal District and 5,565 municipalities GDP (2011): US$ 2,194 billion GDP per capita (2011): US$ 11,239 HDI (2010): 0.699 Gini coefficient (2009) : 0.543

Historical context LA countries: social protection based on social insurance (contributory); as a consequence, a large part of the work force remained socially unprotected. Brazil, 1970 s: emergence of the first semi and non-contributory schemes of social protection addressed to small farmers, disabled and older people. The Brazilian Federal Constitution of 1988 Universal right to health: free core public health system, complemented by a private health sector; Public pension system: special scheme for small farmers was expanded, as well as the social assistance scheme to disabled and older people; Decentralization with a focus on local governments; Reinforcement of social control, accountability and transparency.

Historical context The emergence of CCT programs 1995: First conditional cash transfer programs in Brazil at local level 2001: Bolsa Escola first CCT program at the national level 2001: Bolsa Alimentação national health and nutrition CCT program 2002: Auxílio Gás national cooking gas subsidy (targeted) 2003: Cartão Alimentação food card program

Historical context Before the Bolsa Familia Program: Several different agencies responsible for CCT programs, working with isolated data systems multiple eligibility criteria different benefit levels Those programs had low coverage of the target population were occasionally overlapped

Basic Designing Parameters The Bolsa Familia Program was created in October 2003 with the following objectives: increasing the efficiency and the coherence of previous CCT programs reducing poverty and inequality by providing a minimum level of income to poor families reinforcing the basic social rights of education and health by using them as conditions to receive transfers improving the prospects of beneficiaries in the labor market

The Bolsa Familia Program Main characteristics Created by federal law: better prospects of stability and continuity Focus on the family Commitment to breaking the intergenerational poverty cycle Specific roles for the Federal, State and local governments Families automatically qualify based on information from the Single Registry for Social Programs Benefits paid directly to beneficiary families using bank cards Benefits paid preferentially to women Free use of transfers Social participation and control

The Complexities Rapid growth: the program tripled the number of beneficiary families between 2004 and 2006, when it reached 11 million families. It reached 13.35 million families in December 2011. Merger: the BFP has unified four pre-existing CCTs into a single program, consolidating inherited systems, registers and rules developed by four different agencies Federal context: although it is managed at the federal level, many aspects of the BFP implementation are carried out by Brazil s 5,565 municipalities. The BFP has developed innovative mechanisms to promote incentives for good implementation Source of integration: promoting the BFP as a unifying force for social policy in Brazil, both vertically (unifying transfer programs across different levels of government) and horizontally (linking the BFP with complementary actions and services at all areas of government).

The unification process

Coverage November 2003: 1.2 million families May 2012: 13.5 million families

Targeting Target population: families under the poverty line Eligibility criteria: per capita income of R$ 70 (all families) and between R$ 70 and R$ 140* (families with children and adolescents aged 18 or younger) The targeting mechanism uses only declared income (not real or proxy means test) defines limits to the number of beneficiaries at the local level publicizes the names of beneficiaries * Roughly, between US$ 35 and US$ 70.

Single Registry for Social Programs The Single Registry is the instrument to identify low-income families in Brazil The target population of the Single Registry is larger than that of the BFP: families with per capita income of up to half a minimum wage (around US$ 155*) should be included Used not only by the BFP, but also by many other social programs (social housing; electricity subsidy; Bolsa Verde (green allowance) etc). * New minimum wage of R$ 622 (US$ 310).

The BFP Three Dimensions Benefits: immediate poverty alleviation Conditionalities: access to health and education services, breaking the intergenerational poverty cycle Complementary programs: improvement of labor market prospects

Financial Benefits Eradication of Extreme Poverty Benefit new (variable, bridges the extreme poverty gap) Beneficiary families with children 0-6 years of age whose monthly per capita income (post benefits) does not reach R$ 70 (top up benefit - variable amount per family, enough to bridge the extreme poverty gap)

Conditionalities Education Minimum school attendance of 85% for children from 6 to 15 Minimum school attendance of 75% for adolescents aged 16 and 17 Health Nutrition monitoring for pregnant and nursing women, as well as for children aged 7 or younger Prenatal and postnatal monitoring Immunization for children aged 7 or younger

Complementary programs and actions Integration with other programs and actions that expand the social rights of families, such as civil registry, literacy programs, improvement of housing conditions, etc. Actions directed to income generation, professional training and insertion in the labor market, contributing to improve prospects in the labor market.

Implementation Model The Bolsa Família Program is implemented through a decentralized model, with responsibilities shared by the Federal Government, States, the Federal District and municipalities; States, the Federal District and municipalities define a local manager and receive resources from the Federal Government to support actions related to the Single Registry and the Bolsa Familia Program.

Decentralization and responsibilities Federal government: the Ministry of Social Development regulates the BFP and shares the operational costs with state and local governments. The Ministries of Health and Education are responsible for monitoring conditionalities at the federal level. A federal bank is responsible for operating the extensive BFP data set and the payment system State governments: provide technical support and training to municipalities; provide public services; issue the necessary documentation for potential beneficiaries Local governments: identify and register poor families in the Single Registry; provide public services; check if families have access to health, education and social assistance services

Index of Decentralized Management (IGD) Resources to support the local level of PBF implementation Indicators considered Quality of information in the Single Registry Update of the database Information on conditionalities in the education area Information on conditionalities in the health area Use of financial resources Management of conditionalities Monitoring of beneficiary families (mainly of the most vulnerable ones) Registering new families, data updating and review Implementation of complementary programs

Coverage in May 2012 5,565 municipalities 13.53 million families US$ 800 million/month Average benefit: US$ 60

Coverage and financial resources The financial resources represented 0,46% of the annual GDP in 2011 Operational costs represented 4,18% of the total financial resources

Outcomes The Program has contributed to reduce extreme poverty and income inequality improved school attendance among beneficiaries improved child vaccination among beneficiaries boosted local economies

Evolution of the Gini Index 1981 2008 0,66 0,64 0,62 0,6 0,596 0,601 0,596 0,58 0,56 0,54 0,548 0,52 0,5 Source: Ipea, based on National Household Sample Survey Pnad/IBGE microdata.

Evolution Evolução of temporal extreme da extrema poverty: pobreza: Brazil, Brasil, 1990 1990 a 2008 to 2008 26 Porcentagem de extremamente pobres (%) 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 22,1 22,6 22,9 17,8 17,3 17,7 1 o Objetivo do Milênio 16,8 17,4 17,4 16,5 17,5 15,1 13,3 1,7 p.p./ano 10,8 10,3 8,8 8 6 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Ano Source: Barros, 2009, estimates based on PNAD 1990-2008

Outcomes Reduction of income inequality 16% of income inequality reduction between 1999 and 2009 was due to BFP (Soares et alli, 2010, based on data from the National Household Survey). Reduction of extreme poverty The BFP explains 18% of the reduction in the poverty gap and a quarter of the reduction in the square poverty gap from 5,9% to 4,6% (Soares and Satyro, 2009, based on data from the National Household Survey). Administrative records suggest that, in 2009, 4.3 million out of 12.4 million beneficiary families have crossed the extreme poverty line by receiving the financial benefits (Senarc, 2010). Impact of the financial benefits on the per capita monthly income * Average income increase: 48.7% (from US$ 28.64 to US$ 42.60), which allows families to cross the extreme poverty line; 60% increase in the monthly per capita income in the North and Northeastern regions (administrative records from Senarc, 2010) * New benefit not taken into account.

Impacts on health Outcomes increase in timely vaccination (from 15 to 25 percentage points higher among beneficiaries, depending on the vaccine). beneficiary pregnant women attend 1.5 more pre-natal appointments compared to non beneficiary with the same social and economic profile. probability of being born at term is 14.1 percentage points higher for babies in families that receive the benefit. (Impact Assessment Bolsa Familia Program, 2 round, 2010) Impacts on education increase of 4.4 percentage points on school attendance for 6-17 year-old children. increase of 6 percentage points on school promotion for 6-17 yearold children. (Impact Assessment Bolsa Familia Program, 2 round, 2010) Bolsa Familia students show smaller drop-out rates than public schools students (administrative records from the Ministry of Education)

Bolsa Família and Plan Brazil without Extreme Poverty The BFP has been expanded to include more than 800 thousand extremely poor families. The limit of family members receiving the variable benefit has been expanded from three to five children; A new top-up benefit Eradication of Extreme Poverty has just been created for families with children aged from 0 to 6, to bridge the extreme poverty gap; An active searching strategy was implemented, to find and include in the Single Registry families living in poverty, with no social protection.

SENARC Secretaria Nacional de Renda de Cidadania National Secretariat of Citizenship Income gabinete.senarc@mds.gov.br Phone: +55 61 3433-3618 Fax: +55 61 3433-1614