English Language Development: Progress Monitoring Assessment using LAS Links

Similar documents
Structured English Immersion Models of the English Language Learner Task Force

Program Models. proficiency and content skills. After school tutoring and summer school available

School and classroom structures for comprehensive ELD instruction

Massachusetts District-Determined Measures. World Languages and Foreign Languages

Effective Sheltered Instruction Strategies

Secondary Program Descriptions

Help! My Student Doesn t Speak English. 10 Tips To Help Your English Language Learners Succeed Today

Chapter 5 English Language Learners (ELLs) and the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) Program

Tennessee State Board of Education August 5, 2011 First Reading Item: II. C. ESL Policy Revision

Sample Completed Summative Report Form for a Secondary Teacher 1*

CHARACTERISTICS FOR STUDENTS WITH: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY (LEP)

TRAINGING GUIDE. To Log in type the web address into your browser. This will open the Reading A-Z home page.

READING SPECIALIST STANDARDS

IDENTIFICATION AND ASSESSMENT OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

I. School- Wide DL Components

Performance Goal 1: All students will reach high standards, at a minimum, attaining proficiency or better in reading and mathematics by

Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives (AMAOs) Title III, Part A Accountability System

Q Comp Requirements and Guiding Principles

TExES English as a Second Language Supplemental (154) Test at a Glance

FLORIDA TEACHER STANDARDS for ESOL ENDORSEMENT 2010

MEIGS COUNTY S 2003 ESL / OCR COMPLIANCE REPORT. Descriptive Report on Services to English Language Learners (ELL)

SAN DIEGO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CALIFORNIA ENGLISH LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT TEST (CELDT) ADMINISTRATION, SCHOOL YEAR

Allied Health and Wellness Department Assessment Cycle

Course-Based Key Assessment #4 ESOL Teaching Portfolio and Reflective Summary of Field Experience Used in TESL 5040 Practicum in ESOL

NW COLORADO BOCES ALTERNATIVE LICENSURE PROGRAM

Classroom Impact Analysis Report #2

Frequently Asked Questions Regarding ELL Programs

Caruthers Unified School District. Instructional Program For English Language Learners

Reading Specialist (151)

Section 7: The Five-Step Process for Accommodations for English Language Learners (ELLs)

LANG 557 Capstone Paper . Purpose: Format: Content: introduction view of language

Endorsements A. An endorsement shall be automatically renewed with the certificate on which it is posted. B. Except as noted, all

California University Intermediate Unit 1 ESL Professional Development Project

Basic Skills Teachers Intervention Specialists & Instructional Assistants Support Services Handbook Audubon Public Schools

WIDA ELD Standards Implementation in Boston Public Schools

COMMISSION ON TEACHER CREDENTIALING. Supporting English Learners with Disabilities Symposium May 3, 2016

Questions and Answers Regarding English Language Learners (ELLs) with Disabilities. Volume 10

Comal ISD Bilingual & ESL Program Evaluation. Where Excellence is an Attitude!

TExMaT I Texas Examinations for Master Teachers. Preparation Manual. 085 Master Reading Teacher

TExES Texas Examinations of Educator Standards. Preparation Manual. 154 English as a Second Language Supplemental

Springfield Public Schools English Language Learner Recommended Actions and Implementation Plans

English Language Learners

oxford english testing.com

Using Eggen & Kauchak, Educational Psychology: Windows on Classrooms for the New York State Teacher Certification Examinations

English Learner Program Description White Bear Lake Area Schools

G R A D E S K - I N S T R U C T I O N A N D A S S E S S M E N T

Medina Valley ISD Program for English Language Learners. Bilingual/ESL Program Procedures Guide

Pasco County Schools. Add-On Program. Reading K-12. Endorsement

ELL Assessment Solutions. Diversity of ELL Students TEACHING ELL STUDENTS TODAY MORE CHALLENGING. Linda Alaniz Presenter Judi Lynham Product Manager

CHESHIRE PUBLIC SCHOOLS SUBJECT AREA SUMMARY SHEETS MUSIC

Standard Two: Knowledge of Mathematics: The teacher shall be knowledgeable about mathematics and mathematics instruction.

Review ACADEMIC LANGUAGE CAROUSEL. What does this group need to know about academic language?

Standard 1. Foundational Knowledge Candidates have knowledge of the foundations of reading and writing processes and instruction.

OSU CASCADES. Master of Arts in Teaching Program ESOL Endorsement and/or Middle and High School Education Program Winter 2014

TExES Texas Examinations of Educator Standards. Preparation Manual. 164 Bilingual Education Supplemental

TESOL Standards for P-12 ESOL Teacher Education = Unacceptable 2 = Acceptable 3 = Target

Spring 2016 TELPAS Holistic Rating Training System

Session Objectives. What are the goals of Title III, Part A? Analyzing AMAO Data to Improve Instruction for ELL Students

Reading Specialist Certification

The School District of Osceola County, Florida Melba Luciano, Superintendent ENGLISH FOR SPEAKERS OF OTHER LANGUAGES (ESOL) ADD-ON ENDORSEMENT

Bilingual Education: English Language Learners Secondary Reading/LA Instruction

Massachusetts English Proficiency Assessment (MEPA) 2010 Technical Report

How To Teach Reading

Program Report for the Preparation of Reading Education Professionals International Reading Association (IRA)

PINE GROVE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT ESL PROGRAM

THE NORTH CAROLINA TESTING PROGRAM ELEMENTARY AND MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3 8

Curriculum Development, Revision, and Evaluation Processes

ESOL Endorsement Program

Overview of OELL: Accomplishments, Challenges & Next Steps

VOLUSIA COUNTY SCHOOLS PST PROBLEM SOLVING GUIDELINES FOR ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS KIDS COME IN ALL LANGUAGES

NYS Bilingual Common Core Initiative Teacher s Guide to Implement the Bilingual Common Core Progressions

LPAC/ARD Communication, Collaboration, and Compliance: Three Keys to Success

Parent s Guide to STAR Assessments. Questions and Answers

General Guidelines for Implementation

Pre-Requisites EDAM-5001 Early Literacy Guiding Principles and Language

Developing Measurable Program Goals and Objectives

Snyder ISD Implementation of Bilingual and English as a Second Language Programs

WIDA ELD Standards Implementation in Boston Public Schools 2.0

English Language Quality Standards Programme

Standards and Guidelines of Literacy Lessons in the United States. July 4, 2013 updated June 2015

Nutrition and Culinary Arts I. Example SLO

School of Education MASTER OF ARTS IN EDUCATION. MAED: Reading & Reading Programs

CLAD Ô /BCLAD Ô : California Reforms in the Preparation and Credentialing of Teachers for a Linguistically and Culturally Diverse Student Population

ELL Program Road Maps INTRODUCTION

SCHOLASTIC READING INVENTORY (SRI) - Testing Window: Aug. 28 th Sept. 28 th, 2012

Monmouth University School of Education Alumni Survey May 2011 N = 278 Part I: Year Completing the Most Recent Program at Monmouth University

English as a Second Language Supplemental (ESL) (154)

Oral Fluency Assessment

Massachusetts District-Determined Measures. The Arts

La Joya ISD Office of Bilingual/ESL Education

Transcription:

English Language Development: Progress Monitoring Assessment using CTB/McGraw-Hill has been the leader in the assessment market for more than 80 years. The suite of assessments represents the next generation of LAS, further expanding CTB/McGraw-Hill s continuing commitment to connect language to learning by linking assessment to reporting and instruction for all English language learners. reflects the most comprehensive professionallydeveloped English language learner assessment tool in the market. CTB/McGraw-Hill provides high quality assessments for Grades K 12, and has been involved in language proficiency for more than 30 years beginning with the development of the Language Assessment Scales (LAS ). is based on the tenet that second-language acquisition occurs when students have multiple opportunities to process meaning with their fellow students, teachers, and other adults in the school and elsewhere. Students process information best when that information is systematically introduced, when it is engaging, and when it is accompanied by opportunities to practice the knowledge and skills required to learn the English they will need for academic, social, and test situations. The tasks and item types in are engaging for students and take into account their different learning styles. In creating the family of assessments, CTB/McGraw-Hill has applied years of second language acquisition research. This research is reflected in the types of items, topics, language usage, linguistic expectations, and scoring that are utilized in these assessments. Careful consideration has been given to distinguishing the content of English language proficiency development from that included on English language arts achievement tests. Throughout the life cycle of a student s acquisition of English as a second language, from beginner to fluent, provides a measure of growth that reflects the different rates of growth evident in the ELL population. The assessments include a suite of programs designed to meet a variety of program needs. consists of short placement tests, two summative test forms, Forms A and B, for each grade span, one Spanish form, three parallel benchmark assessment forms, instructional binders for teacher use, and professional development/training. : A Model for Progress Monitoring can be used for English language development and progress monitoring by using a combination of the assessments. Depending on program need and intent, provides schools and districts with the option of measuring student progress up to five times per year. The criterion-referenced assessment measures speaking, listening, reading, and writing, and provides a measure of comprehension skills in academic and social English derived from the listening and reading domains. Each of these domains can be administered individually for monitoring specific areas, or can be administered as a whole to provide a complete picture of students language abilities. blends the assessment of English proficiency with content area knowledge, using vocabulary that is needed for success in school. A wide selection of item formats, including multiple-choice and constructed-response items, are provided, and the content is culturally relevant and motivating to students. The results link to teaching strategies and instructional guidance for teachers. The results can

ELD Progress Monitoring Page 2 also assist teachers in creating remedial instruction to ensure the successful academic achievement in all English academic settings. Form A & B: The assessment is divided into five grade level spans: Primary (K 1), Early Elementary (2 3), Elementary (4 5), Middle School (6 8), and High School (9 12). There are two parallel forms, A and B, available at each grade span. They measure a wide range of skills in each domain efficiently and quickly, ranging from 10 45 minutes per subtest. With the exception of the speaking subtest, each section is group administered, making it easy for teachers to proctor. Forms A & B provide the following characteristics: 5 language proficiency levels (Beginning, Early Intermediate, Intermediate, Proficiency, Above Proficient) Scale Scores for each domain (listening, speaking, reading, writing) Item Analysis Form A & B: Estimated Testing Time Content Area Estimated Time Administration mode Speaking 10 minutes Individual Listening 15 minutes Group Reading 35-45 minutes Group Writing 35-45 minutes Group Scoring Options: Forms A & B includes the following scoring and reporting options: 1. Send to CTB/McGraw-Hill for scoring. A variety of reports are included with this option. Costs range from $12 per student to $25 per student. You can receive hard copy reports, as well as online reporting capabilities. 2. Local scoring using district scanners and software. TestMate Clarity is a Windows -based software database program that allows districts to scan and score. The software yields reports and has an easy export feature, allowing the data to be imported into other local data management systems. Approximate cost is a one-time fee of $12,000. Compatible scanners include NCS/Opscan and most Scantron series. 3. An online scoring tool is available to simplify the handscoring process. Simply enter the raw score results into an online interface to receive instant proficiency and scale score information. Per student cost is $2.10. 4. Hand scoring is available. Using student profile sheets and an interpretation guide, can be handscored in less than 10 minutes. Cost is $2.15 per student. Benchmark Assessments: The Benchmark Assessments are divided into five grade level spans: Primary (K 1), Early

ELD Progress Monitoring Page 3 Elementary (2 3), Elementary (4 5), Middle Grades (6 8) and High School (9-12). There are three parallel forms, book 1, 2, and 3, available at each grade span. Benchmark Assessments provide the following characteristics: Raw score converted to percent correct Item Analysis Benchmark Assessments: Estimated Testing Time Content Area Estimated Time Administration mode Speaking 5 minutes Individual Listening 10 minutes Group Reading 15 minutes Group Writing 10 minutes Group Scoring Options: Benchmark Assessments include the following scoring and reporting options: 1. Local scoring using district scanners and software. TestMate Clarity is a Windows-based software database program that allows districts to scan and score. The software yields reports and has an easy export feature, allowing the data to be imported into other local data management systems. Approximate cost is a one-time fee of $12,000. Compatible scanners include NCS/Opscan and most Scantron series. 2. Hand scoring is available. Using student profile sheets and an interpretation guide, can be handscored in less than 10 minutes. Cost is $2.15 per student. Professional Development/Training For initial preparation time, CTB/McGraw-Hill recommends a Train the Trainers Model. The district chooses who will be trained. Typically, an EL Specialist and an administrator from each site, as well as district office staff attend training. The training is approximately six hours. Training sessions prepare educators and test coordinators to use the test materials and provide a solid foundation for scoring each section of the assessment. Extensive review of the speaking and writing rubrics will be covered. CTB/McGraw-Hill also provides follow-up training as needed including: how to use test results, data analysis, and lesson planning. Cost per day for up to 25 educators is $3,000 and includes all travel costs, and a staff development DVD and CD which trainers can use to replicate training. custom training starts at $4,000 per day depending up the level of customization. The $4,000 per day also includes all travel costs. Pricing Pricing depends on: number of EL students; number of teachers; number of schools; number of assessments per year; scoring; number of staff training days; and assessment configuration. Note: some districts will have a different benchmark assessment configuration for secondary schools versus elementary schools. Costs for the first assessment are typically higher, as all new materials must be purchased. However, many assessment materials are reusable; therefore subsequent assessments are a lower cost. Call CTB/McGraw-Hill for a price quote.

ELD Progress Monitoring Page 4 Progress Monitoring Models: MODEL #1: 3x per year Form A (October) (February) Form A (June) MODEL #2: Pre/Post Test 2x per year Form A (December/January) (May/June) MODEL #3: Pre/Post Test 2x per year Form A (September) (June)

ELD Progress Monitoring Page 5 MODEL #4: * 2 teacher benchmarks * 1 test at end of year (November), (February) Form A (June) MODEL #5: * test used for MS/HS (placement decisions for next school year) (March) MODEL #6: * Benchmark for teachers * for placement and end of year instruction, (November) (March)

ELD Progress Monitoring Page 6 MODEL #7: ELD Report Card: 9/25 ELD Report Card: 12/18 ELD Report Card: 3/19 ELD Report Card: 6/8 * 3 benchmarks correspond with ELD Report card and parent / teacher conferences. Track growth across all three (November 30-December 11), (March 1-12), Benchmark #3 (May 17-28) MODEL #8: ELD Report Card: 9/24 ELD Report Card: 12/17 ELD Report Card: 4/8 * 3 benchmarks correspond with ELD Report card and parent / teacher conferences. Track growth across all three (September 1-15), (December 1-15), Benchmark #3 (May 14-25

ELD Progress Monitoring Page 7 MODEL #9: * Teacher benchmarks 3x per year * Pre/Post test using for scale scores and proficiency levels 2x per year,, Benchmark #3 Form A (October) (April) MODEL #10: * Teacher benchmarks 2x per year, (November), (March) For additional information, please contact CTB/McGraw-Hill at 800.538.9547 or visit www. CTB.com/LASLinks Copyright 2010 by CTB/McGraw-Hill LLC. All rights reserved. LAS,, and TestMate Clarity are registered trademarks of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All other brands and product names are property of their respective owners and are not associated with the publisher of this publication.