Using Patterns of Volatility in Calculating VaR

Similar documents
An introduction to Value-at-Risk Learning Curve September 2003

Calculating VaR. Capital Market Risk Advisors CMRA

Contents. List of Figures. List of Tables. List of Examples. Preface to Volume IV

Multiple Regression Used in Macro-economic Analysis

The analysis on the Evolution of Capital Market basically in Romania during 1995 November 2011

Non Linear Dependence Structures: a Copula Opinion Approach in Portfolio Optimization

Master of Mathematical Finance: Course Descriptions

ER Volatility Forecasting using GARCH models in R

Forecasting methods applied to engineering management

Dr Christine Brown University of Melbourne

ADVANCED FORECASTING MODELS USING SAS SOFTWARE

Java Modules for Time Series Analysis

Reducing Active Return Variance by Increasing Betting Frequency

DOWNSIDE RISK IMPLICATIONS FOR FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ROBERT ENGLE PRAGUE MARCH 2005

ASPECTS REGARDING THE RISK MANAGEMENT IN THE FINANCIAL INVESTMENT COMPANIES, IN THE CONTEXT OF RECENT ECONOMIC CHANGES

Bank of Japan Review. Global correlation among government bond markets and Japanese banks' market risk. February Introduction 2012-E-1

Analysis of Financial Time Series

Profit Forecast Model Using Monte Carlo Simulation in Excel

FORECASTING THE EX-ANTE TRACKING ERROR FOR GLOBAL FIXED INCOME PORTFOLIOS: EMPHASIS ON THE ESTIMATION OF THE VARIANCE-COVARIANCE MATRIX

Masters in Financial Economics (MFE)

A macroeconomic credit risk model for stress testing the Romanian corporate credit portfolio

Chapter 1. Vector autoregressions. 1.1 VARs and the identi cation problem

Financial Econometrics

The Correlation in the Global Context of Financial Markets and the Evolution of Emerging Market of Romania Through the Bucharest Stock Exchange

Effective Stress Testing in Enterprise Risk Management

Credit Risk Stress Testing

A Comparison of Option Pricing Models

A comparison between different volatility models. Daniel Amsköld

Parametric Value at Risk

Volatility modeling in financial markets

CONTENTS. List of Figures List of Tables. List of Abbreviations

Measuring downside risk of stock returns with time-dependent volatility (Downside-Risikomessung für Aktien mit zeitabhängigen Volatilitäten)

ASPECTS REGARDING THE INFLUENCE OF VOLATILITY ON THE OPTION S PRICE

VOLATILITY FORECASTING FOR MUTUAL FUND PORTFOLIOS. Samuel Kyle Jones 1 Stephen F. Austin State University, USA sjones@sfasu.

Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Prague, Czech Republic.

11. Time series and dynamic linear models

Implied volatility transmissions between Thai and selected advanced stock markets

Financial Risk Management Exam Sample Questions/Answers

Using Duration Times Spread to Forecast Credit Risk

Uncertainty and fluctuations on the stock markets

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. International Finance Discussion Papers. Number 600. First version: December 1997

Geostatistics Exploratory Analysis

Asset Liability Management

ANALYSIS OF THE ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE OF A ORGANIZATION USING MULTIPLE REGRESSION

Financial Risk Management Exam Sample Questions

GARCH 101: An Introduction to the Use of ARCH/GARCH models in Applied Econometrics. Robert Engle

Financial TIme Series Analysis: Part II

Concepts in Investments Risks and Returns (Relevant to PBE Paper II Management Accounting and Finance)

Volatility in the Overnight Money-Market Rate in Bangladesh: Recent Experiences PN 0707

Option Valuation. Chapter 21

Introduction to SAS Risk Management

Operational Risk Modeling *

RiskMetrics TM Technical Document

Validating Market Risk Models: A Practical Approach

Statistical estimation using confidence intervals

GN47: Stochastic Modelling of Economic Risks in Life Insurance

Margin Calculation Methodology and Derivatives and Repo Valuation Methodology

Risk Management of Large Option Portfolios via Monte Carlo Simulation. Marco Avellaneda Courant Institute, New York University

PITFALLS IN TIME SERIES ANALYSIS. Cliff Hurvich Stern School, NYU

Valuing Stock Options: The Black-Scholes-Merton Model. Chapter 13

Statistics Graduate Courses

Volatility spillovers among the Gulf Arab emerging markets

A Trading Strategy Based on the Lead-Lag Relationship of Spot and Futures Prices of the S&P 500

RiskMetrics TM Technical Document

Regulatory and Economic Capital

Introduction to Risk, Return and the Historical Record

Porter, White & Company

A Time Series Analysis of the Chicago Board Options Exchange Volatility Index (VIX)

Modeling Volatility of S&P 500 Index Daily Returns:

Implementing Reveleus: A Case Study

Chapter 6. Modeling the Volatility of Futures Return in Rubber and Oil

Sensex Realized Volatility Index

by Maria Heiden, Berenberg Bank

Analysis of Bayesian Dynamic Linear Models

Quantitative Methods for Finance

SYSTEMS OF REGRESSION EQUATIONS

Statistics for Retail Finance. Chapter 8: Regulation and Capital Requirements

A comparison of Value at Risk methods for measurement of the financial risk 1

Matching Investment Strategies in General Insurance Is it Worth It? Aim of Presentation. Background 34TH ANNUAL GIRO CONVENTION

Booth School of Business, University of Chicago Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2015, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Solutions to Midterm

Northern Trust Corporation

Introduction to Financial Models for Management and Planning

Data as of 30/04/2010 Page 1 of 9. Risk Questionnaire and Adviser Select Results Risk Profile Score from Questionnaire

NEXT GENERATION RISK MANAGEMENT and PORTFOLIO CONSTRUCTION

Impact of Derivative Trading On Stock Market Volatility in India: A Study of S&P CNX Nifty

DIAGNOSIS OF FINANCIAL POSITION BY BALANCE SHEET ANALYSIS - CASE STUDY

Numerical Methods for Option Pricing

EDF CEA Inria School Systemic Risk and Quantitative Risk Management

Optimal linear-quadratic control

Financial Risk Forecasting Chapter 8 Backtesting and stresstesting

Examining the Relationship between ETFS and Their Underlying Assets in Indian Capital Market

TH E VaR IMPLEMENTATION HANDBOOK

MULTIPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS OF MAIN ECONOMIC INDICATORS IN TOURISM. R, analysis of variance, Student test, multivariate analysis

Fast Monte Carlo CVA using Exposure Sampling Method

REAL-TIME PRICE FORECAST WITH BIG DATA

MONTE CARLO SIMULATION FOR INSURANCE AGENCY CONTINGENT COMMISSION

STOCHASTIC MODELING OF INSURANCE BUSINESS WITH DYNAMICAL CONTROL OF INVESTMENTS 1

Bayesian Forecasting for Financial Risk Management, Pre and Post the Global Financial Crisis

Solving simultaneous equations using the inverse matrix

Nature and Purpose of the Valuation of Business and Financial Assets

Transcription:

Using Patterns of Volatility in Calculating VaR Professor Radu Titus MARINESCU, Ph.D. Artifex University of Bucharest Lecturer Mădălina Gabriela ANGHEL, Ph.D. Artifex University of Bucharest Daniel DUMITRESCU, Ph.D. Student Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest Adina Mihaela DINU, Ph.D. Student Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest Abstract Based on the above, it can be concluded that the use of Value at Risk method allows a more efficient allocation of financial resources available, thus eliminating the overexposure to a single risk source. Also, the VaR model allows capital investors to properly assess their activity and position in the capital market, depending on the level of risk they are willing to and take. Key words: value at risk, EWMA model, GARCG model, capital market Determination of value Value at Risk can be carried out using models EWMA (Exponentially Weighted Moving Average), or using the GARCH model. Following are presented the main theoretical aspects regarding the use of the two types of models mentioned above to determine the Value at Risk indicator. 1. VaR calculation using EWMA According to the model EWMA (Exponentially Weighted Moving Average) volatility depends on the previous yield and previous volatility : (current volatility) λ = weighting constant rt -1 = yield in previous period Revista Română de Statistică Trim III/2013- Supliment 143

λ is a parameter that indicates the financial asset volatility persistence. If its value is higher, the shock occurred at one time in the market is more persistent. Parameter λ 1 shows how quickly the asset volatility responds to a shock in any direction. The greater the value of this parameter is, the greater the reaction of volatility at shock is. RiskMetrics uses a λ value of 0.94 for daily data. Ways to incorporate volatility calculated by EWMA models in VaR models a) The first way is to incorporate volatility is historical simulation with weighting of data according to volatility. In this case, past performance is standardized based on conditional volatility. b ) In the case of Monte Carlo simulation using EWMA, yields can be simulated considering that a normal distribution follows, but the covariance matrix is created using EWMA. c) Analytical VaR using EWMA. In generating the covariance matrix we use an equation that is analogous to a variance equation: (covariance between active 1 and 2) r 1, t - 1 or r 2, t -1 = yields of both active in the preceding period Once defined, the covariance matrix can be used to calculate VaR using, in this sense, the analytical method (which is recommended for simple portfolios ) or the Monte Carlo simulation (shown for portfolios that include options). For analytical simulation, the VaR for h days, with level of relevance α is: Zα = the critical value of normal standard distribution for α level of relevance; P = the current value of the portfolio; σ = standard deviation forecast for a horizon of h days. The standard deviation is calculated using a covariance matrix of yields for h days. 144 Revista Română de Statistică Trim. III/2013 - Supliment

When represented at assets level, it shall take the following form: w = ( w1, w2,..., wn ) is the share of assets in the portfolio ; V = forecast, for a horizon of h days, of the covariance matrix for the yields of the assets included in the portfolio. When represented at risk factor level, it takes the following form: β = ( β 1, β 2,..., β n) represents the sensitivity factors of the portfolio; V = forecast, for a horizon of h days, of the covariance matrix for risk factors yelds. The forecast of the covariance matrix on a horizon of h days, for simple portfolios, is obtained by applying the rule, multiplying the covariance matrix for a one-day horizon with. This methodology is not suitable for portfolios that include options because it will lead to incorrect results, in this case beeing recommended to use a covariance matrix for horizon h 2. Calculating VaR using GARCH models In constructing an ARCH model we have to consider two separate equations : one for media contingent - the equation of evolution of asset returns; one for the conditional variance - the volatility equation. In 1986, Tim Bollerslev propose the following form of the GARCH model (p,q ) for the determination of the indicator value Value at Risk : rt= a ARMA process (m, n) or a Random Walk model (if β1, i = 0, where i = 1, m and β2, j = 0, where i = 1, n ) ; ht ( volatility) = an ARCH process (q ) and GARCH (p) ; Revista Română de Statistică Trim III/2013- Supliment 145

α1 = persistent volatility; α2 = speed of response to shocks in market volatility. The following condition must be met in order to have an not explosive process (explosive volatility): The ARCH and GARCH coefficients must be a subunit and positive. This model, interpreted in a financial context, describes how an agent is trying to forecast volatility for the next period based on the average long-term ( α0 ) of the variance, of the prior variance (GARCH term) and of information on the volatility observed in the previous period (ARCH term). If the asset return in the previous period was unexpectedly high, the agent will increase the variance expected in the future. The model accepts the situation where large changes in the course of financial assets is likely to continue to follow its variations, a phenomenon that is called "clustering volatility ". Tests on mature financial markets showed a response of exchange rate volatility generally lower threshold of 0.25 and a degree of permanence to its upper limit over 0.7. Subsequently GARCH model was extended to relax certain assumptions or to incorporate asymmetry of financial assets rate impact or to separate the trend volatility of short-term volatility. The inclusion of GARCH models in VaR calculation can be done in several ways, namely: Analytical VaR by using a covariance matrix based on GARCH models; historical simulation when data are weighted according to the volatility - the data are standardized according to their volatility estimated by GARCH models; Monte Carlo Simulation - Evolution of the yields can be simulated on the basis of the covariance matrix calculated on the GARCH models basis, which enables both simulation of volatility evolution and simulation of asset returns evolution - which is an advantage if the portfolio contains options. To calculate the covariance matrix, the correlation coefficient can be considered constant, in which case the covariance is determined by correlation coefficients and variables: σij, t +1 = covariance between the two assets i and j ; ρij = correlation coefficient between the two assets; σi, t +1 and σj, t +1 = represents the variances of the two assets. 146 Revista Română de Statistică Trim. III/2013 - Supliment

Using GARCH models has been suggested in practice for modeling direct P/L portfolio and calculate VaR by its conditional volatility, thus avoiding the calculation of covariance matrices. 3. Using VaR (value at risk) model to analyze capital market In papers published in our country or abroad, Value at Risk model is widely used to determine the risk associated with investment activity. Such a model is shown by Anghelache Gabriela - Victoria and Radu Alina Nicoleta in the article " VAR method used in market risk ". In it is analyzed, with the VAR model, the evolution of market risk for the BET- C index. In this case, volatility is estimated using a GARCH model. Based on the above methodology elements, it is analized the evolution of BET C index, resulting in a GARCH model (1,1) with innovations normally distributed. Estimated GARCH model is stationary, but has a high persistence in volatility. In conclusion this study provides a graphical presentation of actual loss over a period of ten days for Bet Index and Value at Risk values determined both on the 1% quantile of the normal distribution and on the distribution of the 1% t-students. Based on the above, it can be concluded that the use of Value at Risk method allows a more efficient allocation of financial resources available, thus eliminating the overexposure to a single risk source. Also, the VaR model allows capital investors to properly assess their activity and position in the capital market, depending on the level of risk they are willing to and take. In this part I decided to apply the model to determine the VaR (value at risk) to estimate the Var level under different scenarios for the portfolio consisting of 10 titles. For this it is required to present the daily returns vector and covariance matrix of the 10 titles analyzed in the portfolio management. Daily return vector hopes of 10 titles: Share Daily return ELMA -0.001754 SNP 0.001669 BRM 0.002394 TGN 0.000007 TUFE 0.000426 SIF5 0.001176 SIF4 0.001338 Revista Română de Statistică Trim III/2013- Supliment 147

Share Daily return TEL -0.001178 BIO 0.000392 TLV 0.001933 Source: own calculations Covariance matrix for the daily returns of securities: Source: own calculations Historical simulation method involves determining the continuous daily returns of the securities using for this purpose the following formula: = Continuous daily yield title "x" = Stock price at time "t" = Stock price at time " t -1" The values obtained are presented in appendices. Estimating the risk by applying the variance - covariance method requires to determine the level of trust to be took in consideration for the portfolio variance estimation for which the calculation is made. By applying this method, the risk is determined by the following relationship: W = market value of the portfolio c = trust coefficient for distribution of probability considered (tabulated values in table) σp =portfolio volatility 148 Revista Română de Statistică Trim. III/2013 - Supliment

From the tables on repartition function of normal standard distribution result the following values for the parameter "c" corresponding probabilities : Probability (P) c 90% 1,28 95% 1,65 97,5% 1,96 99% 2,33 Next, we estimate several scenarios of VaR using the variance covariance method.to begin, we consider the case of echiponderate portfolio containing the 10 shares (titles). Also we have to made some clarifications as: We believe that the investment is RON 1,000,000, σp for this echiponderate portfolio is 1.043887 % (calculated in a previous chapter). Trust level Confidence Daily VaR coeficient c (historical) 90% 1,28 13361.754 lei 95% 1,65 17224.136 lei 99% 2,33 24322.567 lei Portfolio that has the highest value of return (0.001942) ( P12 ) corresponds σp equals 1.925013. The vector of structure is the following: X ELMA X SNP X BRM X TGN X TUFE X SIF5 X SIF4 X TEL X BIO X TLV 0.00% 10.00% 60.00% 5.00% 0.00% 5.00% 5.00% 0.00% 5.00% 10.00% Appropriate Value at Risk is : Trust level Confidence Daily VaR coeficient c (historical) 90% 1,28 24640.166 95% 1,65 31762.715 99% 2,33 44852.803 The VaR is calculated similarly for the other portfolios. P σ P P1 0.01050309 P2 0.01053150 P3 0.01045263 P4 0.01113755 P5 0.01168311 Revista Română de Statistică Trim III/2013- Supliment 149

P σ P P6 0.01283053 P7 0.01233227 P8 0.01355212 P9 0.01160075 P10 0.01097588 P11 0.01791019 P12 0.01925013 P13 0.02058549 P14 0.01189201 P15 0.01057804 P16 0.01217076 P17 0.01062262 1P8 0.01043887 Trust level c P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 90% 1,28 13443.955 13480.320 13379.366 14256.064 14954.381 16423.078 95% 1,65 17330.099 17376.975 17246.840 18376.958 19277.132 21170.375 99% 2,33 24472.200 24538.395 24354.628 25950.492 27221.646 29895.135 Trust level c P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12 90% 1,28 15785.306 17346.714 14848.960 14049.126 22925.043 24640.166 95% 1,65 20348.246 22360.998 19141.238 18110.202 29551.814 31762.715 99% 2,33 28734.189 31576.440 27029.748 25573.800 41730.743 44852.803 Trust level c P13 P14 P15 P16 P17 P18 90% 1,28 26349.427 15221.773 13539.891 15578.573 13596.954 13361.754 95% 1,65 33966.059 19621.817 17453.766 20081.754 17527.323 17224.136 99% 2,33 47964.192 27708.383 24646.833 28357.871 24750.705 24322.567 Bibliography Codirlaşu, A. ; Chidesciuc N.Al. (2008 ) - "Banking Econometrics. Applied Econometrics using EViews 5.1. - Course Notes" www.dofin.ase.ro Miclaus, PG ; Bobirca, A., Lupu, R., Ungureanu, st. (2009 ) - "A Garch dynamic conditional correlation model for the computation of dynamic VAR on the Romanian capital market", Economic Journal, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu Anghelache, Gabriela Victoria, Radu Alina Nicoleta - "VaR method used in market risk", International Scientific Symposium "Effects and solutions to economic crisis financial Artifex Publishing, 2009 150 Revista Română de Statistică Trim. III/2013 - Supliment