AP SPANISH LANGUAGE AND CULTURE EXAM 2014 SCORING GUIDELINES

Similar documents
AP FRENCH LANGUAGE AND CULTURE EXAM 2015 SCORING GUIDELINES

AP FRENCH LANGUAGE AND CULTURE EXAM 2015 SCORING GUIDELINES

AP WORLD LANGUAGE AND CULTURE EXAMS 2012 SCORING GUIDELINES

AP GERMAN LANGUAGE AND CULTURE EXAM 2015 SCORING GUIDELINES

AP FRENCH LANGUAGE AND CULTURE 2013 SCORING GUIDELINES

AP CHINESE LANGUAGE AND CULTURE 2007 SCORING GUIDELINES

French Language and Culture. Curriculum Framework

English II Writing. Persuasive Writing Rubric

EXJ 201. Show a little understanding of the persuasive purpose of the task but neglect to take or to maintain a position on the issue in the prompt

NAEP released item, grade 8

AP ENGLISH LITERATURE AND COMPOSITION 2014 SCORING GUIDELINES

Grade 4. Expository Writing Rubric

SCORE DESCRIPTION TASK COMPLETION / TOPIC DEVELOPMENT LANGUAGE USE 5 Demonstrates

English Language Proficiency (055)

Student Performance Q&A:

Bilingual Education Assessment Urdu (034) NY-SG-FLD034-01

AP ENGLISH LITERATURE AND COMPOSITION 2011 SCORING GUIDELINES

FUNCTIONAL SKILLS ENGLISH - WRITING LEVEL 2

AP ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION 2009 SCORING GUIDELINES

!!!!!! "#$%&!$'!()&!"*+!,%-(-'.!+&/(!,$0!,%-(-'.!,$%1/)$2! "(34&'(!,&5-'6%!"&%-&/!!

Common Core Writing Rubrics, Grade 3

AP SPANISH LANGUAGE 2013 PRESENTATIONAL WRITING SCORING GUIDELINES

Professor Gabriel Aquino

Designing and Using Weighted Rubrics

Montgomery County Public Schools Advanced English Semester A Exam Review

AP ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION 2015 SCORING GUIDELINES

AP English Literature & Composition 2002 Scoring Guidelines

AP ENGLISH LITERATURE AND COMPOSITION 2008 SCORING GUIDELINES

Alignment of the National Standards for Learning Languages with the Common Core State Standards

The Old Man and The Sea

AP ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION 2010 SCORING GUIDELINES (Form B)

City University of Hong Kong. Information on a Course offered by Department of English with effect from Semester A in 2012/2013

Control of a variety of structures and idioms; occasional errors may occur, but

AP ENGLISH LITERATURE AND COMPOSITION 2010 SCORING GUIDELINES

AP ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION 2015 SCORING GUIDELINES

AP ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION 2008 SCORING GUIDELINES

demonstrates competence in

Guide to Writing the AP English Language Synthesis Essay. Wednesday, December 5, 12

AP ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION 2010 SCORING GUIDELINES

Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium: English/Language Arts Practice Test Scoring Guide Grade 11 Performance Task

Rubric of All Rubrics

AP EUROPEAN HISTORY 2007 SCORING GUIDELINES (Form B)

Appendix 14: Sample Writing Frames

EAP Writing Competencies Levels 1-6

AP ENGLISH LITERATURE AND COMPOSITION 2015 SCORING GUIDELINES

AP SPANISH LANGUAGE 2011 PRESENTATIONAL WRITING SCORING GUIDELINES

Rubrics for Assessing Student Writing, Listening, and Speaking High School

How To Write A Task For Ielts

Correct Answers and Difficulty Levels for the Official SAT Practice Test

Test Specifications for Written Composition

Information Fluency in Humanities Writing

THE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG School of Economics and Finance FINA0601/ FINA4341 Quantitative Risk Management

AP ENGLISH LITERATURE 2006 SCORING GUIDELINES (Form B) Question 1 (Hughes s To Paint a Water Lily )

FOR TEACHERS ONLY The University of the State of New York REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION. ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (Common Core)

AP FRENCH LANGUAGE 2008 SCORING GUIDELINES

Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International General Certificate of Secondary Education

AP ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION 2010 SCORING GUIDELINES (Form B)

AP ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION 2007 SCORING GUIDELINES

English for Business Communications (8959) Marking Guide for Tutors

FOR TEACHERS ONLY The University of the State of New York REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION. ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (Common Core)

Rubrics for AP Histories. + Historical Thinking Skills

A Guide to Cambridge English: Preliminary

LDC Template Task Collection 2.0

AP ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION 2007 SCORING GUIDELINES (Form B)

English II. Persuasive Scoring Guide. March 2015

English I. Expository Scoring Guide. April 2014

Unit 1: The Three Worlds: Native Americans, Europeans and Africans Meet in NYS

AP ENGLISH LITERATURE AND COMPOSITION 2009 SCORING GUIDELINES

Key words related to the foci of the paper: master s degree, essay, admission exam, graders

GRADE 11 English Language Arts Standards Pacing Guide. 1 st Nine Weeks

AP ENGLISH LITERATURE AND COMPOSITION 2007 SCORING GUIDELINES

Social Entrepreneurship MBA AOL Rubric 2014

AMERICAN COUNCIL ON THE TEACHING OF FOREIGN LANGUAGES (ACTFL)

CENTRAL TEXAS COLLEGE: English 1301

TEKS: 8.14A, 8.14B, 8.14C, 8.14D, 8.14E, 8.18A, 8.18B, 8.18C

Student Guide for Usage of Criterion

AP ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION 2013 SCORING GUIDELINES

KET for Schools Reading and Writing Part 9 teacher s notes

Student Performance Q&A:

AP ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION 2014 SCORING GUIDELINES

COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS WRITING RUBRICS

Allow a few minutes for editing.

The Great Debate. Handouts: (1) Famous Supreme Court Cases, (2) Persuasive Essay Outline, (3) Persuasive Essay Score Sheet 1 per student

INTERNET ACCESS AT SCHOOL

AP ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION 2007 SCORING GUIDELINES

Annotated Examples of Student Writing

NEW YORK STATE TEACHER CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS

by Nicole Page, Holly Scott, and Charlotte Davis

SECTION 5 TEST III (WRITING) SAMPLE CONSTRUCTED- RESPONSE ASSIGNMENT

ACTFL PROFICIENCY GUIDELINESCSPEAKING Revised 1999

Listening Student Learning Outcomes

Transcription:

AP SPANISH LANGUAGE AND CULTURE EXAM 2014 SCORING GUIDELINES Identical to Scoring Guidelines used for French, German, and Italian Language and Culture Exams Presentational Writing: Persuasive Essay 5: STRONG performance in Presentational Writing Effective treatment of topic within the context of the task Demonstrates a high degree of comprehension of the sources viewpoints, with very few minor inaccuracies Integrates content from all three sources in support of the essay Presents and defends the student s own viewpoint on the topic with a high degree of clarity; develops a persuasive argument with coherence and detail Organized essay; effective use of transitional elements or cohesive devices Fully understandable, with ease and clarity of expression; occasional errors do not impede comprehensibility Varied and appropriate vocabulary and idiomatic language Accuracy and variety in grammar, syntax and usage, with few errors Develops paragraph-length discourse with a variety of simple and compound sentences, and some complex sentences 4: GOOD performance in Presentational Writing Generally effective treatment of topic within the context of the task Demonstrates comprehension of the sources viewpoints; may include a few inaccuracies Summarizes, with limited integration, content from all three sources in support of the essay Presents and defends the student s own viewpoint on the topic with clarity; develops a persuasive argument with coherence Organized essay; some effective use of transitional elements or cohesive devices Fully understandable, with some errors which do not impede comprehensibility Varied and generally appropriate vocabulary and idiomatic language General control of grammar, syntax and usage Develops mostly paragraph-length discourse with simple, compound and a few complex sentences 3: FAIR performance in Presentational Writing Suitable treatment of topic within the context of the task Demonstrates a moderate degree of comprehension of the sources viewpoints; includes some inaccuracies Summarizes content from at least two sources in support of the essay Presents and defends the student s own viewpoint on the topic; develops a somewhat persuasive argument with some coherence Some organization; limited use of transitional elements or cohesive devices Generally understandable, with errors that may impede comprehensibility Appropriate but basic vocabulary and idiomatic language Some control of grammar, syntax and usage Uses strings of mostly simple sentences, with a few compound sentences 2014 The College Board.

AP SPANISH LANGUAGE AND CULTURE EXAM 2014 SCORING GUIDELINES Identical to Scoring Guidelines used for French, German, and Italian Language and Culture Exams 2: WEAK performance in Presentational Writing Unsuitable treatment of topic within the context of the task Demonstrates a low degree of comprehension of the sources viewpoints; information may be limited or inaccurate Summarizes content from one or two sources; may not support the essay Presents, or at least suggests, the student s own viewpoint on the topic; develops an unpersuasive argument somewhat incoherently Limited organization; ineffective use of transitional elements or cohesive devices Partially understandable, with errors that force interpretation and cause confusion for the reader Limited vocabulary and idiomatic language Limited control of grammar, syntax and usage Uses strings of simple sentences and phrases 1: POOR performance in Presentational Writing Almost no treatment of topic within the context of the task Demonstrates poor comprehension of the sources viewpoints; includes frequent and significant inaccuracies Mostly repeats statements from sources or may not refer to any sources Minimally suggests the student s own viewpoint on the topic; argument is undeveloped or incoherent Little or no organization; absence of transitional elements and cohesive devices Barely understandable, with frequent or significant errors that impede comprehensibility Very few vocabulary resources Little or no control of grammar, syntax and usage Very simple sentences or fragments 0: UNACCEPTABLE performance in Presentational Writing Mere restatement of language from the prompt Clearly does not respond to the prompt; completely irrelevant to the topic I don t know, I don t understand or equivalent in any language Not in the language of the exam - (hyphen): BLANK (no response) 2014 The College Board.