SEATTLE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AMERICAN INN OF COURT ETHICS MAY 21, 2015



Similar documents
Attorneys convicted of crimes.

The N.C. State Bar v. Wood NO. COA (Filed 1 February 2011) 1. Attorneys disciplinary action convicted of criminal offense

Harmonization and Enforcement of USPTO Ethical Standards in the Post-AIA Era

INTEGRATED BAR OF THE PHILIPPINES COMMISSION ON BAR DISCIPLINE GUIDELINES FOR IMPOSING LAWYER SANCTIONS A. PURPOSE AND NATURE OF SANCTIONS

RULES OF THE U. S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Tuesday 18th November, 2008.

MISSOURI S LAWYER DISCIPLINE SYSTEM

RULES FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINARY ENFORCEMENT OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Peter Tom, Justice Presiding, Angela M. Mazzarelli Eugene Nardelli Luis A. Gonzalez Bernard J. Malone, Jr., Justices.

FACT SHEET Contact: Office of Legislative and Public Affairs (703) Fax: (703) Feb.

MERCER COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION XTREME CLE. 2.0 NJ CLE Credits. Charles Centinaro, Esq., Director of Attorney Ethics

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT. AlS-0567 ORDER. The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a

Committee on Judicial Ethics Teleconference Thursday, January 15, 2015

SUPREME COURT, STATE OF COLORADO

Rule 42. Practice of attorneys not admitted in Nevada. (1) All actions or proceedings pending before a court in this state;

SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN

Inquiry Concerning A Florida Lawyer

Who participates in standards work?

DEALING WITH DIFFICULT ATTORNEYS (Attorney Grievance Committee) 2014 New York State Magistrates Association Conference Syracuse, New York

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE USPTO DIRECTOR ) ) ) ) ) FINAL ORDER

SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN

SURVEY OF ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY RULES IN THE STATE AND FEDERAL COURTS OF NEW YORK WITH COMMENTS. by the. The Committee on Professional Discipline

AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION STANDARDS FOR IMPOSING LAWYER SANCTIONS

Rule 82.1 Who May Appear as Counsel; Who May Appear Pro Se

OVERVIEW OF BAR DISCIPLINE DIVERSION PROGRAMS (Prepared May 23, 2007) 1

Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department D42594 G/htr

SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN

BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Application for Admission to Limited Practice as Attorney Under APR 8(g) Exception for Military Lawyers

Complying with the FCPA- An Exploration of Ethical Issues Raised by Recent Cases Are the Professional Conduct Rules Any Different?

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Ethical Considerations for In-House Intellectual Property Attorneys

A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF MICHIGAN S ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE SYSTEM

In the Matter of Thomas J. Howard, Jr. O R D E R. This matter is before the court pursuant to a petition for reciprocal discipline filed by this

BEFORE THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS STATE OF OREGON for the DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND BUSINESS SERVICES INSURANCE DIVISION ) ) ) ) )

Your Rights as a Complainant in the Grievance Process State of Connecticut Judicial Branch

SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN

People v. J. Bryan Larson. 13PDJ031. October 18, 2013.

Chapter EDITION. Accountants; Tax Consultants and Preparers

THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE WASHINGTON, D.C.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA LYNCHBURG DIVISION. v. Civil Action Number: 6:09cv9

Chapter 9 Uniform Athlete Agents Act

HEALTH OCCUPATIONS TITLE 19. SOCIAL WORKERS SUBTITLE 3. LICENSING

BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT PANEL B FINDINGS AND ORDER

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE TITLE 19 - ATTORNEYS CHAPTER ADMISSION TO THE BAR. Rule SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION FOR MILITARY SPOUSE ATTORNEYS

INDIANA PARALEGAL ASSOCIATION CODE OF ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND RULES FOR ENFORCEMENT

2012 WI 48 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Aaron J. Rollins, Attorney at Law:

S15Z0555. IN THE MATTER OF JONATHAN RICHARD HUDDLESTON. On January 28, 2013, Jonathan Richard Huddleston submitted an

BANKRUPTCY AND DEBTOR-CREDITOR LAW SPECIALIZATION ADVISORY BOARD STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES FOR CERTIFICATION, RECERTIFICATION AND DECERTIFICATION

UNITED STATES TAX COURT WASHINGTON, D.C PRESS RELEASE

BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

June 2008 Nevada Lawyer - 80th Anniversary Issue

LAWYER TO LAWYER MENTORING PROGRAM WORKSHEET Q INTRODUCTION TO REPORTING LAWYER MISCONDUCT OR UNFITNESS

SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN

OFFICE OF CHIEF DISCIPLINARY C ROSS A ANNENBERG 100 WASHINGTON STREET ELLIS LAW OFFICES HARTFORD CT PLEASANT STREET WORCESTER MA 01609

Unauthorized Practice of Law

Part 2 Peace Officer Training and Certification Act

People v. Webb. 13PDJ007. June 13, Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge disbarred Glenn L. Webb (Attorney Registration Number

How To Get A $1,000 Filing Fee From A Bankruptcy Filing Fee In Arkansas

ORANGE COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION Formal Opinion (Ghostwriting by Contract Lawyers and Out-of-State Lawyers)

Professional Responsibility Before the Office of Enrollment and Discipline: Cases and Considerations

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS BOARD ON PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY

In the Indiana Supreme Court

Special Consideration for Board Attorneys. Federation of State Medical Boards-Board Attorney Workshop November 12, 2015

701/ ti$i;;l i.h; i,:,i:n,i ;1.r ir{f,''i} ,1, y.t 1U1+ exhibits and witnesses on his behalf, and to have a hearing officer determine the facts,

UPDATES TO ETHICAL ISSUES FOR TRUST AND ESTATE LAWYERS New and Revised Rules of Professional Conduct on the Way (We think!)

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. Misc. Docket AG. No. 13. September Term, 2005 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND WILLIAM M.

REFERENCE TITLE: accountancy board; certified public accountants HB Introduced by Representative Thorpe AN ACT

lawyer regulation SANCTIONED ATTORNEYS

Conviction Integrity Unit Best Practices October 15, 2015

(l) IN THE MATTER OF $ ROBERT EUGENE EASLEY $ CAUSE NO. 4677s srate BAR CARD NO $ DEFAULT JUDGMENT OF DISBARMENT

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Mecklenborg, 139 Ohio St.3d 411, 2014-Ohio-1908.]

NOTE TO LAWYERS & ETHICS SECTION 4 EXAM PROCTORS: STUDENTS MAY BRING IN THIS PAPER TO THE FINAL EXAM Lawyers & Ethics 2013 Common Law The purpose of

Supreme Court of Louisiana

STANDARDS FOR ATTORNEY CERTIFICATION OF THE TEXAS BOARD OF LEGAL SPECIALIZATION. The Standards for Attorney Certification are divided into two parts.

December 10, Paula Frederick General Counsel State Bar of Georgia 104 Marietta Street, Suite 100 Atlanta, GA

Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Sandra Lynn Reno, Misc. Docket AG No. 5, September Term, 2013

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Harmon, 143 Ohio St.3d 1, 2014-Ohio-4598.]

CHAPTER 20. FLORIDA REGISTERED PARALEGAL PROGRAM PREAMBLE. The purpose of this chapter is to set forth a definition that must be met in order to

OPINION AND ORDER IMPOSING SANCTIONS

MODEL PLAN FOR VOLUNTARY PARALEGAL REGULATION

Standards and Requirements for Specialist Certification and Recertification

Filing False Tax Returns

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT ( CJA ) PANEL APPLICATION FORM

: : before this court (the Court Annexed Mediation Program ); and

California Judges Association OPINION NO. 56. (Issued: August 29, 2006)

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 11-B-1631 IN RE: MAZEN YOUNES ABDALLAH ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

CHAPTER 31 ADMISSION TO THE BAR

FORMAL OPINION NO Government Lawyer Employment Negotiations

IN RE: MAUREEN STRETCH NO. BD S.J.C. Order of Term Suspension entered by Justice Lenk on October 2, SUMMARY 2

A Reminder: Avoiding and Surviving Attorney Ethics Complaints in Texas*

PROCEDURES FOR ADMISSION TO THE WESTERN DISTRICT BAR

Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Smith Sept. Term 2011, Misc. No. 10

BEFORE THE EVIDENTIARY PANEL FOR STATE BAR DISTRICT NO STATE BAR OF TEXAS JUDGMENT OF DISBARMENT. Parties and Appearance

STANDARDS OF CONDUCT FOR REPRESENTATIVES APPEARING BEFORE THE COMMISSION TRIBUNAL CHAPTER 7

AN ACT PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS

Supreme Court, Appellate Division First Judicial Department 61 Broadway New York, New York (212) (212) FAX

2011: The Year in Ethics and Bar Discipline. By Constance V. Vecchione, Bar Counsel January 2012

Assembly Bill No. 85 Committee on Commerce and Labor

Transcription:

SEATTLE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AMERICAN INN OF COURT ETHICS MAY 21, 2015

INTRODUCTION JONATHAN MCFARLAND 2

IN RE REINES - CASE OVERVIEW CHRISTIE MATTHAEI 3

APPLICABLE RULES THERESA WANG 4

APPLICABLE FEDERAL RULES Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure (e.g., Rule 46(b)-(c)) Local District Court Rules (e.g., Western District of Washington LCR 83.3) Local Appellate Court Rules (e.g., Federal Circuit Rule 46(f)) Local Appellate Court Discipline Rules (e.g., Federal Circuit Attorney Discipline Rule 5(b)) USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct 37 CFR 11.804 5

FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 46 (b) SUSPENSION OR DISBARMENT. (1) Standard. A member of the court's bar is subject to suspension or disbarment by the court if the member: (A) has been suspended or disbarred from practice in any other court; or (B) is guilty of conduct unbecoming a member of the court's bar..... (c) DISCIPLINE. A court of appeals may discipline an attorney who practices before it for conduct unbecoming a member of the bar or for failure to comply with any court rule.... 6

FRAP 46 APPLIED TO IN RE REINES SCOTUS has interpreted FRAP 46 to require[] members of the bar to conduct themselves in a manner compatible with the role of courts in the administration of justice. In re Snyder, 472 U.S. 634, 644-45 (1985). Courts are to be guided by case law, applicable court rules, and the lore of the profession, as embodied in codes of professional conduct. Id. at 645. 7

CONDUCT UNBECOMING STANDARD No intentional conduct needed Examples (often premised on State RPC) Failing to prosecute an appeal with due diligence Submitting false statements to the court Refusing to return excess fees despite court order Failing to respond to communications regarding a pending case Other instances Fed. Cir. Attorney Discipline Rule 2 USPTO RPCs 11.804 engages in conduct that adversely reflects on the practitioner s fitness to practice before the Office. 8

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON LOCAL COURT RULE 83.3 (a) Standards of Professional Conduct In order to maintain the effective administration of justice and the integrity of the court, attorneys appearing in this district shall be familiar with and comply with the following materials ("Materials"): (1) The local rules of this district, including the local rules that address attorney conduct and discipline; (2) The Washington Rules of Professional Conduct (the "RPC"), as promulgated, amended, and interpreted by the Washington State Supreme Court, unless such amendments or additions are specifically disapproved by the court, and the decisions of any court applicable thereto; (3) The Federal Rules of Civil and Criminal Procedure; (4) The General Orders of the court. 9

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON LOCAL COURT RULE 83.3 (3) Grounds for Discipline. An attorney may be subject to disciplinary action for any of the following: (A) violations of the Standards of Professional Conduct stated in subsection (a) above; (B) disbarment, suspension, sanctions or other attorney discipline imposed by any federal or state court, bar association or other governing authority of any state, territory, possession, or the District of Columbia, or any other governing authority or administrative body which regulates the practice of attorneys; (C) conviction of any felony or a misdemeanor involving dishonesty or corruption, including, but not limited to, those matters listed in Rule7.1(a)(2)(B)-(c) of the Washington Rules of Enforcement of Lawyer Conduct ("ELC"); (D) misrepresentation or concealment of a material fact made in an application for admission to the Bar of this court or in a pro hac vice or reinstatement application; (E) violation of this court's Oath of Attorney. 10

FEDERAL CIRCUIT RULE 46(F) (f) Disciplinary Action. Disciplinary action against an attorney will be conducted in accordance with the Federal Circuit Attorney Discipline Rules. 11

FEDERAL CIRCUIT ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE RULE 2 GROUNDS FOR DISCIPLINE (a) Conviction. Conviction in another court of a serious crime may be the basis for discipline. (b) Disbarment or Suspension. Reciprocal discipline may be imposed based on disbarment or suspension by another court or by an agency. (c) Resignation. Disbarment may be imposed based on an attorney s disbarment on consent or resignation from the bar of another court or an agency while an investigation into an allegation of misconduct is pending. (d) Act or Omission. An act or omission by an attorney that violates the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, the Federal Circuit Rules, these rules, or orders or instructions of the court, other than an act or omission contemplated by Rule 3(d) of these rules, may be the basis for discipline. A failure to notify the court in compliance with Rule 6(a) may itself be the basis for discipline. (e) Conduct Unbecoming. Any conduct before the court unbecoming a member of the bar may be the basis for discipline. 12

USPTO RULE OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT 37 CFR 11.804 It is professional misconduct for a practitioner to: (a) Violate or attempt to violate the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the acts of another; (b) Commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on the practitioner s honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a practitioner in other respects; (c) Engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation; (d) Engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice; (e) State or imply an ability to influence improperly a government agency or official or to achieve results by means that violate the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct or other law;... 13

USPTO RULE OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT 37 CFR 11.804 CONT D It is professional misconduct for a practitioner to: (f) Knowingly assist a judge, hearing officer, administrative law judge, administrative patent judge, administrative trademark judge, or judicial officer in conduct that is a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct or other law; (g) Knowingly assist an officer or employee of the Office in conduct that is a violation of applicable rules of conduct or other law; (h) Be publicly disciplined on ethical or professional misconduct grounds by any duly constituted authority of (1) a State, (2) the United States, or (3) the country in which the practitioner resides; or (i) Engage in other conduct that adversely reflects on the practitioner s fitness to practice before the Office. (i) Engage in other conduct that adversely reflects on the practitioner s fitness to practice before the Office. 14

HYPOTHETICALS GINA CULBERT & JONATHAN MCFARLAND 15

ENTER HYPO 1: QUESTION ETHICAL TEXT VIOLATION? 1. True 2. False True False 16

ENTER HYPO 2: QUESTION ETHICAL TEXT VIOLATION? 1. True 2. False True False 17

ENTER HYPO 3: QUESTION ETHICAL TEXT VIOLATION? 1. True 2. False True False 18

ENTER HYPO 4: QUESTION ETHICAL TEXT VIOLATION? 1. True 2. False True False 19

ENTER HYPO 5: QUESTION ETHICAL TEXT VIOLATION? 1. True 2. False True False 20

ENTER HYPO 6: QUESTION ETHICAL TEXT VIOLATION? 1. True 2. False True False 21

QUESTIONS? 22