Enhancing EMR Value Through Collaboration: HIM and IT. CTHIMA Meeting August 14, 2016 Carol R Selvey, MHSA, FHIMSS, FACHE

Similar documents
Of EHRs and Meaningful Use. Pat Wise, RN, MA, MS FHIMSS COL (USA ret d) VP, Healthcare Information Systems, HIMSS

UAE Progress on the Acute Care EMRAM. Prepared by HIMSS Analytics Presented by Jeremy Bonfini

HealthFore Technologies Limited

BENCHMARKING EMR ADOPTION IN ITALY

Hospital IT Expenses and Budgets Related to Clinical Sophistication. Market Findings from HIMSS Analytics

Data Center Hosting: Build, Upgrade or Partner Tuesday, February 21, a.m. 12 p.m.

EHR Adoption and Vision for HIM

Electronic Medical Record Adoption Model (EMRAM) John Rayner Director of Professional Development HIMSS-UK

EHR Adoption: Creating an Appetite

BENCHMARKING EMR ADOPTION FOR HELSIT 2013

Informatics Strategies & Tools to Link Nursing Care with Patient Outcomes in the Learning Health Care System

The Role of e-health in Supporting Patient Safety

Advancing Healthcare through IT and Management Systems.

EMRAM is the Standard What are the Benefits? John P Hoyt EVP HIMSS Analytics

Financial and Clinical Benefits of IT Implementation. John P Hoyt EVP HIMSS Analytics

The State of U.S. Hospitals Relative to Achieving Meaningful Use Measurements. By Michael W. Davis Executive Vice President HIMSS Analytics

Health Information Technology in Home Care and Hospice

6th Annual Ambulatory PM & EHR Study. HIMSS Analytics

Electronic Medical Records vs. Electronic Health Records: Yes, There Is a Difference. A HIMSS Analytics TM White Paper. By Dave Garets and Mike Davis

Information Technology and Electronic Medical Records

Leveraging IT Capabilities to Accelerate Business Value Impact from Electronic Medical Record Adoption

e-health Conference May 29, 2013 Rome, Italy Electronic Medical Record Adoption Rates: Italy, Europe, United States, Middle East, Asia Comparisons

E-Health An overview

RPMS-EHR. Electronic Health Record

Information and Communication Technology in Health Care To Infinity and Beyond. Pam Bush, RN, BScN

Table of Contents. Page 1

MATURITE DES SIH EN EUROPE

HITECH Implementation Update and Status (Part 1) Meaningful Use, Standards, and Certification Wednesday, January 27 th 12:00 1:45 PM

Harvesting a Meaningful Use Crop within a Mainstream Midwest Community Hospital. Mary Kay Cody, BS, MS, RN-C Connie Ganz, BSN, RN

THE EMR ADOPTION MODEL: RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN IT ADOPTION, PATIENT SAFETY AND PERFORMANCE

NHCHC Meaningful Use of Electronic Health Records Resource Catalogue. Meaningful Use Overview

Addressing the State of the Electronic Health Record (EHR)

Information Governance includes the Core Record Set for Coding Compliance Bonnie S. Cassidy, MPA, RHIA, FHIMSS

Means for Rural Healthcare Delivery

Special Topics in Vendor- Specific Systems. Outline. Results Review. Unit 4 EHR Functionality. EHR functionality. Results Review

State of the U.S. Healthcare Information Technology Industry INDUSTRY REPORT PROVIDED BY. and

Using EHRs, HIE, & Data Analytics to Support Accountable Care. Jonathan Shoemaker June 2014

AAMC EMR Adoption Model Comparisons. June 30, 2011 Prepared by HIMSS Analytics

Meaningful Use Stage 2:

Electronic Health Records: A Journey to Next Generation Healthcare

9/25/2012. Agenda. Defining the interrelation of MU, HIM and Release of Information IOD s partnership approach to MU

Best Practices in Electronic Health Records

Meaningful Use and Lab Related Requirements

Demonstrating Meaningful Use of EHRs: The top 10 compliance challenges for Stage 1 and what s new with 2

HIMSS Analytics Continuity of Care Maturity Model Going Beyond EMRAM

Hospital EMR Adoption Model

The Electronic Health Record in Private Practice

Applying Lessons Learned in the New Frontier

EHR Selection. Fall 2009 IDN Summit

Meaningful Use & Meaningful Results from Electronic Health Records

A Roadmap for EMR Adoption

Listening to the Human Side A collaborative approach to building an electronic health record

Electronic Medical Records. Robert M. Underwood, MD, CPE, FAAEM CMIO, RMH Healthcare

Industry leading Education

Component 11: Configuring EHRs

Eligible Professionals please see the document: MEDITECH Prepares You for Stage 2 of Meaningful Use: Eligible Professionals.

Adoption and Meaningful Use of EHR Technology in a Hospital

Meaningful Use. 101 for Physician Offices January 2012

Health Information Management Systems Technology and Analysis (HIMSTA) Domains, Competencies and Modules. The Curriculum.

Streamline Your Radiology Workflow. With Radiology Information Systems (RIS) and EHR

HIPAA regulation: The challenge of integrating compliance and patient care

Stage 6 Hospitals: The Journey and the Accomplishments

Extending HIS to Support Meaningful Use. October 21, 2010

Health Information Technology

Health Information Technology in Healthcare: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 1

How To Prepare For A Patient Care System

Health IT: Better Information for Better Decisions. HSE Healthcare Leaders Masterclass April Robert Wah, MD

For sample use only - data from 2006.

TRUVEN HEALTH UNIFY. Population Health Management Enterprise Solution

<your organization logo> Make the Connection to <your organization name>

ti of IT in Acute Care Hospitals

Electronic Records / Clinical Information Systems (CIS) and Global Markets. November 2014

Community Health Initiatives Taking HIT to the Next Level

Mark Anderson, FHIMSS, CPHIMSS Healthcare IT Futurist

MEDITECH Consulting Services

HIMSS and AHIMA: Trends in HIE Organizational Staffing. CMS ehealth Forum December 6, 2013

Guide To Meaningful Use

Electronic Medical Record in Turkish Hospitals. Findings from the Public Sector

Centricity Healthcare User Group B07_01: Meaningful Use Attestation Strategies for Stage 1, Stage 2 & PQRS

Nursing Informatics Institute Sharp Healthcare, San Diego, CA

Decreasing Complexity and Cost of EHR Adoption John Weir President CAPG Policy Committee Meeting February 23, 2010

Strategy for Health Information Exchange. Rebecca Weber, CIO Meridian Health

Disclaimer This webinar may be recorded. This webinar presents a sampling of best practices and overviews, generalities, and some laws.

Technology Mediated Translation Clinical Decision Support. Marisa L. Wilson, DNSc, MHSc, CPHIMS, RN-BC. January 23, 2015.

Health Information Technology and the National Quality Agenda. Daphne Ayn Bascom, MD PhD Chief Clinical Systems Officer Medical Operations

Global Headquarters: 5 Speen Street Framingham, MA USA P F

WELCOME TO: MED USA MIKESIAPERAS CEO

LEVERAGING HEALTH INFORMATION EXCHANGE TO CREATE A CONNECTED CARE COMMUNITY

Agenda. Topic Industry Today - Quality Measure Reporting Stage 1 Meaningful Use - Overview - Tenet Experience

ehealth and Health Information Exchange in Minnesota

Comments to the HIT Standards Committee Implementation Workgroup Implementation Experiences Panel Monday, March 8, 2010

Viewpoints from Leading Healthcare Chief Information Officers

Six Steps to Achieving Meaningful Use Qualification, Stage 1

Data Analytics: The Next Wave in Health IT. Big Data Conference June 17, Robert Wah, MD. Global Chief Medical Officer CSC

Best Practices for Implementing an EHR System

Electronic Health Records: Trends, Issues, Regulations & Technologies

Achieving Meaningful Use in Private Practice. A close examination of Stage 2 requirements

Nandan Banerjee Cogent Infotech Corporation COGENT INFOTECH CORPORATION

Electronic Health Records

How To Use Centricity Emr

Transcription:

Enhancing EMR Value Through Collaboration: HIM and IT CTHIMA Meeting August 14, 2016 Carol R Selvey, MHSA, FHIMSS, FACHE

Learning Objectives Recognize opportunities for HIM to enhance skills through collaboration with IT, transforming its role in the healthcare enterprise Examine research indicating that the most successful EMR adoptions occur when HIM plays a greater role in the implementation Recognize stages of electronic medical record functionalities improving care delivery processes (as defined by the HIMSS EMR Adoption Model) Introduce the Continuity of Care Maturity Model

Shared Vision IT HIM Better health through information technology

HIM Involvement in EHR Implementations Percent of HIM professionals involved in EHR implementations, by role EHR Implementation Factor % Involved Manage amendments to records 69% Participate in document improvement program 67% Serve on EHR steering or comparable committee 61% Test legal admissibility of records 50% Design or revise reports 50% Participate in development of EHR functionality specifications 49% Serve as EHR project manager or on project management team 44% Audit changes in electronic documentation for correctness 39% Participate in quality improvement programs 39%

Early Adopter Hospital Findings Early adopters recognized the essential role HIM could play in the implementation of Electronic Medical Records especially in these key areas: Document Management essential need to integrate paper documents with electronic data (scanning) Patient Care Charting affinity for data quality provided exceptional partner to provide design, workflow and auditing expertise (coding and regulatory knowledge) Computerized Order Entry- data quality management Correlation between HIM involvement and better/best outcomes

Correlation between HIM Involvement and EHR Success EHR Functionality Best Outcomes* *System use that met or exceeded benchmarks as defined by the study **System use did not meet benchmarks of system use Document Management (N=265) 85% 38% 62% Workflow or process improvement in HIM department 95% 75% Responsible for paper record retention following adoption of system 90% 81% Workflow or process improvement in clinical care setting 70% 46% Responsible for implementing and training for system 69% 54% Responsible for planning or selecting system vendor 50% 42% No role 0% 3% Other Outcomes** Patient Care Charting (N=270) 86% 60% 40% Active participant in data quality management 52% 35% Active participant in workflow and process improvement 50% 44% Active participant in planning and selecting the system 33% 36% Active participant in designing screens and templates 28% 29% No role 20% 31% Computerized Provider Order Entry (N=243) 78% 17% 83% Active participant in data quality management 42% 27% No role 42% 50% Active participant in workflow and process improvement 37% 23% Active participant in planning and selecting the system 15% 22%

Meaningful Use (MU) Stages Stage 1: Meaningful use criteria focus on Data Capture and Sharing** Electronically capturing health information in a standardized format Stage 2: Meaningful use criteria focus on Advance Clinical Processes More rigorous health information exchange (HIE) Stage 3: Meaningful use criteria focus on Improved Outcomes Improving quality, safety, and efficiency, leading to improved health outcomes Using that information to track key clinical conditions Increased requirements for e-prescribing and incorporating lab results Decision support for national high-priority conditions Communicating that information for care coordination processes Electronic transmission of patient care summaries across multiple settings Patient access to self-management tools Initiating the reporting of clinical quality measures and public health information More patient-controlled data Access to comprehensive patient data through patient-centered HIE Using information to engage patients and their families in their care Improving population health

MU Collaboration and the Digital Shift The quest for MU achievement brought the value of HIM skills and collaboration with IT into view in several areas: Data integrity assurance (accuracy and consistency of content) Effective management of referral data (through Health Information Exchange, Secure Health Messaging or E-Fax) Patient Portal assistance and proactive management of confidentiality and privacy and participation in Health Information Exchange (HIE) development Integrating voice recognition software and reducing transcription Overall life cycle management of patient medical record policy transparency and ethical stewardship

Digital Shift Stages New Skills HIM Stages: Reliance on Paper Records Transitional Hybrid System Electronic Medical Record integration Skills migrate from clerical to digital focus Filing to Indexing and Scanning Data integrity coaches Data analytics and knowledge of technological trends

Common Objective Ensure the most relevant clinical information is available to the clinician at the right place and at the right time

Purpose of Adoption Model Thought leadership Quality, Safety, Efficiency improvements To reflect the market Where is the market heading To inform government policy Contributor to architecture of Meaningful Use program Used around the world to gather data for policy formulation To drive the market A useful roadmap for CIOs, governance boards, public policy

ARRA Q2 2009 2015 Final Complete EMR, CCD transactions to share data; Data warehousing; Data continuity with ED, ambulatory, OP 0.3% 4.2% Physician documentation (structured templates), full CDSS (variance & compliance), full R-PACS 1.0% 27.1% Closed loop medication administration 4.5% 35.9% CPOE, Clinical Decision Support (clinical protocols) 3.6% 10.1% Nursing/clinical documentation (flow sheets), CDSS (error checking), PACS available outside Radiology CDR, Controlled Medical Vocabulary, CDS, may have Document Imaging; HIE capable 38.4% 31.6% 16.4% 2.6% Ancillaries - Lab, Rad, Pharmacy - All Installed 7.2% 1.7% All Three Ancillaries Not Installed 13.4% 2.1% Data from HIMSS Analytics Database 2015 2016 HIMSS Analytics N = 5167 N = 5460 12

Complete EMR, CCD transactions to share data; Data warehousing; Data continuity with ED, ambulatory, OP Q2 2011 MU Payments 2015 Final 1.1% 4.2% MU Stage 3* Physician documentation (structured templates), full CDSS (variance & compliance), full R-PACS Closed loop medication administration 4.0% 6.1% 27.1% 35.9% MU Stage 2 CPOE, Clinical Decision Support (clinical protocols) 12.3% 10.1% MU Stage 1 Nursing/clinical documentation (flow sheets), CDSS (error checking), PACS available outside Radiology 46.3% 16.4% CDR, Controlled Medical Vocabulary, CDS, may have Document Imaging; HIE capable 13.7% 2.6% Ancillaries - Lab, Rad, Pharmacy - All Installed 6.6% 1.7% All Three Ancillaries Not Installed 10.0% 2.1% Data from HIMSS Analytics Database 2015 HIMSS Analytics N = 5441 N = 5490 13

Ambulatory EMR Adoption Model SM HIE capable, sharing of data between the EMR and community based EHR, business and clinical intelligence Q2 2012 Q2 2015 0.00% 7.40% MU Stage 3* Advanced clinical decision support, proactive care management, structured messaging 1.20% 9.17% Personal health record, online tethered patient portal 0.04% 7.93% MU Stage 2 CPOE, Use of structured data for accessibility in EMR and internal and external sharing of data 0.41% 0.99% MU Stage 1 Electronic messaging, computers have replaced the paper chart, clinical documentation and clinical decision support 10.92% 12.03% Beginning of a CDR with orders and results, computers may be at point-of-care, access to results from outside facilities 34.10% 24.68% Desktop access to clinical information, unstructured data, multiple data sources, intra-office/informal messaging 5.29% 33.98% Paper chart based 48.04% 3.82% Data from HIMSS Analytics Database 2015 HIMSS Analytics N = 9,247 N = 34,115 14

Patient Portals The use of patient portals by tethered ambulatories has increased by over 15 percentage points since 2012 Data from HIMSS Analytics Database 2015 HIMSS Analytics Total N size for each year is based on number of tethered ambulatories scored in the A-EMRAM; this is the number of ambulatories answering the ambulatory EMR function questions asked in the HIMSS Analytics Database.

Summary Profile of a Stage 6 and 7 Organization Use data to drive improved outcomes related to Process, Financial, Clinical, Quality & Safety Are paperless, or near paperless (create no paper) All clinically relevant data is in the EMR Are fully committed to continuous process improvement through collaboration Strong IT leadership and executive champions Clinician / end-user champions

Representation of Hospitals with an "A" Leapfrog Hospital Safety Grade by EMRAM Stage Source: HIMSS Analytics

Financial Performance (Profitability) Source: HIMSS Analytics

Stage 7 Is Just The Beginning!! So, What s Next?

The Industry Challenge Continuity of care

What is Continuity of Care? Citizens perspective Non-disruption of care provided to a patient throughout his/her care journey, across care settings and care givers Industry perspective Alignment of healthcare resources across care settings orchestrated in a way that delivers the best healthcare services and value possible for a defined population under your care

Ultimate Objective A multidimensional approach to continuity of care

Continuity of Care Maturity

This is NOT an IT project A multi-stakeholder roadmap Administrators CEO/COO/CFO/ CSO/CPO Clinical/Medical Leaders CMIO/CNO/CNIO Technology & Information Leaders CIO/CPO/HIM

References Article citations: Fenton, Susan H.; Amatayakul, Margret; Work, Mitch. "HIM Impact on EHRs: Newly Released Study Links HIM Professionals and Successful EHR Implementations." Journal of AHIMA 77, no.9 (October 2006): 36-40. Eramo, Lisa A. Hello EHR, Good-Bye HIM? Rethinking the Role of HIM Professionals in an Electronic Environment. For The Record, Vol. 25 No. 5 P. 18 (March 2013) Dimick, Chris. "Health Information Management 2025: Current Health IT Revolution Drastically Changes HIM in The Near Future" Journal of AHIMA 83, no.8 (August 2012): 24-31. Cassidy, Bonnie, and Susan P. Hanson. "HIM Practice Transformation." Journal of AHIMA 76, no.5 (May 2005): 56A-B. Online EHR Incentives & Certification resource: https://www.healthit.gov/providersprofessionals/how-attain-meaningful-use

THANK YOU Carol R Selvey, MHSA, FHIMSS, FACHE Vice President, First Health Advisory cselvey@fcp.com