WATER SANITATION FOR PLANT PRODUCTION

Similar documents
WASTEWATER TREATMENT OBJECTIVES

Removing Heavy Metals from Wastewater

Innovation and Progress in Water Treatment Technology

AP ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 2007 SCORING GUIDELINES

FERTIGATION. Lawrence J. Schwankl

Wastewater Reuse. Typical treated wastewater is:

Chemistry at Work. How Chemistry is used in the Water Service

Treatment options for hydrogen sulfide. Testing for hydrogen sulfide

Ion Exchange Softening

Iron and Manganese BACTERIA AND IRON AND MANGANESE

Water Treatment. Session Objectives

Membrane Filtration Technology: Meeting Today s Water Treatment Challenges

Iron and manganese are two similar elements

Trichloramine and Asthma in Swimming pools & spas Problem solved

DESCRIPTION OF STORMWATER STRUCTURAL CONTROLS IN MS4 PERMITS

WATER CHEMISTRY AND POOL WATER BALANCE

Keeping Your Swimming Pool and Spa Healthy Environmental Health Guide

A Guide to Trouble-Free Cooling Towers

Testing Water for Gardening and Lawn Irrigation

The Control of ph and Oxidation Reduction Potential (ORP) in Cooling Tower Applications By Charles T. Johnson, Walchem Corporation

WASTE WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM (OPERATING MANUALS )

Water quality can have a huge impact on plant

What To Do When Your Well is Flooded. Common Sense Steps To Take If Your Well Is Covered by Flood Water

Potting Mix Choices and Recommendations

MAINTENANCE OF SMALL WATER SUPPLY, SANITATION AND IRRIGATION SCHEMES

Coagulation and Flocculation

SYNERGISTIC APPLICATION OF ADVANCED PRIMARY AND SECONDARY WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS

CERTIFICATION TO OPERATE WATER AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS

Nature's Cleaning Process

Marina Bay on Boston Harbor Water-treatment system by OilTrap Environmental

Well Water Iron Removal Using Quantum DMI-65 Granular Filter Media

for Sediment Removal desired levels. The filtered water then can be chemically treated to ensure its safety. Municipal water Preliminary settling

CERTIFIED SEPTIC EVALUATION PREPARED FOR MATT HASHEM 1673 MT. MAJOR HWY, ALTON, NH 03810

Cal Water 1961 Petra Lane, Placentia, CA (800) CAL-WATER (800) FAX: (714)

Basic Chemistry of Chlorination

Water Softening for Hardness Removal. Hardness in Water. Methods of Removing Hardness 5/1/15. WTRG18 Water Softening and Hardness

HUBER Vacuum Rotation Membrane VRM Bioreactor

Cooling Tower Sidestream Filtration A Green, Proven Cost Reduction Technology

Stenner Pump Chlorinator Installation & Start Up Guide

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 1800 Washington Boulevard Baltimore Maryland (410)

Royal Caribbean International Advanced Wastewater Purification Systems

Water Water Treatment Plant Tour

Use of Nano-scale materials in Water Purification

Septic System Owner s Manual

Town of New Castle Utility Department Introduction

The Ultimate Swimming Experience

Bacteria Control Troubleshooting Guide for Automated Watering Systems

Source Water Protection Practices Bulletin Managing Sanitary Sewer Overflows and Combined Sewer Overflows to Prevent Contamination of Drinking Water

GUIDELINES FOR LEACHATE CONTROL

Storage-stable Aqueous Solutions of Chlorine Dioxide

CHAPTER 7: REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER

Water Treatment & Purification Chemicals

POOL SUNSHINE IONIZER MODELS SPD, SPD2 AND SPS INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS

WATER TREATMENT IN AUCKLAND

Total Suspended Solids Total Dissolved Solids Hardness

What Is Humic Acid? Where Does It Come From?

LAB 5 - PLANT NUTRITION. Chemical Ionic forms Approximate dry Element symbol Atomic weight Absorbed by plants tissue concentration

DRAFT July, 2006 Page 1 of 18

Mission Hill Water Treatment Plant & Kalamalka Lake Pump Station Upgrades

Chapter 3: Separating Mixtures (pg )

FAMILY PROTECTION FROM WATERBORNE DISEASES

Irrigation Water Quality for Greenhouse Production

Troubleshooting Your RO

Drain to Drinking Water

A HOMEOWNERS GUIDE ON-SITE SEWAGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS

Welcome to the Understanding Dissolved Oxygen learning module. This section provides information on the following topics:

This Questionnaire is divided into 8 sections referring to different capacity areas on the safe use of wastewater in agriculture:

The formation of polluted mine water

ECOAZUR BLUEWATER WATER PURIFICATION PLANTS

Scheduling Maintenance for Infiltration Basins and Trenches

Environmental Technology March/April 1998

Introduction. Creating Water Quality Confidence. Sample Communication and Guidance - Natural Treatment. Terminology Guidelines

Water Disinfection for Produce Applications. Decay and Illness Prevention

Now Resistant Microorganisms Have No Place to Hide

Irrigation Water for Greenhouses and Nurseries

Remediation of Water-Based Drilling Fluids and Cleaning of Cuttings

THE NWF WATER PURIFICATION PROCESS FRESH WATER IN A NATURAL WAY. Esko Meloni Ferroplan Oy

The Empirical Formula of a Compound

Lesson Plan: How Do We Clean Polluted Water?

Advanced Treatment of Hazardous Wastes(1) Advanced Treatment of Hazardous Wastes(2) Advanced Environmental Chemistry. Design of Solid Waste Landfill

Facility Classification Standards

Oxivir Tb and Accelerated Hydrogen Peroxide (AHP) Frequently Asked Questions

Basics of Reverse Osmosis

MC4-50 Feeding System

Managing the Risk of Legionnaires Disease in Vehicle Wash Systems

Bioremediation of Petroleum Contamination. Augustine Ifelebuegu GE413

How To Know If Your Well Water Is Safe

Understanding basic pool chemistry is one of the most important factors in pool maintenance. Properly balanced water creates an environment that

Complete. Water Solutions. for Rural India

Best Practice in Boiler Water Treatment

1.3 Wastewater and Ambient Water Quality

National Precast Concrete Association

UTILIZATION of PLASMA ACTIVATED WATER in Biotechnology, Pharmacology and Medicine. JSC TECHNOSYSTEM-ECO Moscow, Russia April, 2009

For all turfgrass areas. Now you can test soil reaction at different levels in the soil profile. Check Soil ph on:

Outlet stabilization structure

Design of Purified Water and Water For Injection Systems. Hugh Hodkinson Engineers Ireland Chemical & Process Division

SULFUR AND MICRONUTRIENT RESPONSES ON CORN AND SOYBEANS George Rehm Department of Soil, Water, and Climate, University of Minnesota, St.

Chapter 14 Quiz. Multiple Choice Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

A build-up of dirt and decaing organic matter is undesirable in koi ponds.

Subject: Technical Letter 22 April 1977 Removal of Water Supply Contaminants -- Copper and Zinc

Transcription:

WATER SANITATION FOR PLANT PRODUCTION Essentially any size nursery can install a water recycling and sanitation system. This handout will focus on sanitation. However, we will briefly discuss all five steps, since better water quality improves effectiveness of many sanitation treatments. There are basically five steps that are performed when recycling and treating water: 1) Collection of runoff water 2) Removal of floating debris 3) Removal of suspended particulate matter (sand, silt, clay, organic matter) 4) Sanitation treatment for pathogen contamination 5) Control of fertilizer levels 1. Collection and detention of untreated and treated water supplies a. Detention basin size If runoff water is being collected, the size of the collection basin must be considered. In addition, a basin for sanitized water should be considered, the size of which will be determined by the water demands of the nursery. b. Location of collection basin(s). The topography of the nursery and space available must be taken into consideration. Also, if there are different types of production sites, i.e. propagation, plug production, field crops, or container crops, there may be multiple water sources and water recycling units. If the nursery is situated on a hill, then the collection basin can often be located at the lower elevation so that gravity can be used to collect runoff. 2. Removal of floating debris Most floating debris can easily be removed via baffles located at or near the collection basin or sedimentation pits. 3. Removal of suspended material Several types of methods may be implemented to remove suspended matter from runoff water. The technique to use will be determined by the degree of purification desired and the type of suspended residues in the water. a. Sedimentation through gravity. This is the most common and economical process used by nurseries. Most suspended material will settle out in the sedimentation pond or collection basin within a few hours. However, clay, being a very fine colloidal material, may require several days to settle out of the water. Sedimentation pits will need to be cleaned out occasionally to remove the build up of particulate matter on the bottom. b. Flocculation. This is the process where a combination of ferric sulfate, alum, or a polymer are added to the water to flocculate the suspended clay particles, resulting in a rapid (5 minutes) sedimentation of flocculated clay. c. Sand/Charcoal filtration. This process is done to filter out any remaining suspended materials. 4. Sanitation Runoff water and irrigation water derived from surface waters usually contain plant pathogens such as Phytophthora, Pythium, etc. Several methods of sanitation available on the market. The type of method to use will be determined by the cleanliness of the water, the degree of sanitation desired, the type or recycling system being used, and local regulations. 5. Fertilizer injection Fertilizer injection is usually the final step in the process, since various sanitation methods may denature fertilizer chelates suspended in the water, or even remove fertilizer from the water. Fertilizer blending is usually done in conjunction with mixing of fresh water with recycled water in a way that the electrical conductivity does not increase in the production system. Page 1 of 12

SANITATION METHODS The list of the most common sanitation methods are as follows: a. Chlorination b. Slow sand filtration c. Rapid sand filtration d. Membrane mediated filtration e. Heat f. Ultraviolet light g. Ozonation h. Copper ionization Caution 1. Test a sanitation method before installing on a large scale. Before purchasing and installing a treatment system, a small pilot system should be tested to make sure the treatment method works for your nursery. New methods of water sanitation are occasionally developed and marketed, but they may not be suitable for your operation. 2. Routinely check efficacy of sanitation system. Once a sanitation system is installed, it should be routinely inspected and tested to make sure that effective sanitation processes are occurring. 3. Keep records. Maintain a log of the system for ease of troubleshooting if problems do occur. 4. Regulations and Safety. Follow all applicable regulations and safety procedures. CHLORINATION Chlorine treatment is one of the most popular methods utilized for the control of human and plant pathogens. When chlorine is added to the water supply, aside from killing pathogens, it may also bind to organic matter or chemicals such ammoniacal nitrogen. If chlorine binds to organic or chemical components, the chlorine is considered unavailable for pathogen control. Therefore the effective or residual chlorine concentration is reduced. This is the reason that chlorination is more effective with water sources that are not heavily contaminated with organic matter. When most pathogens are exposed to high enough concentrations of chlorine for a sufficient period of time, they will be killed. Effectiveness of treatment is influenced by six factors: (1) Chlorine concentration The greater the concentration, the more quickly it disinfects. However, too much chlorine may also kill plants. Most plants are safe if residual chlorine concentrations are <100 ppm (3 meq/l), and irrigation is applied to the root media. However, some crops are very sensitive to chlorine. Also, some plants will be sensitive to chlorine irrigation water applied to leaves at much lower concentrations, which can cause leaf spots. (2) Duration of pathogen exposure to chlorine Effective exposure times may range from 1 minute to 24 hours. (3) Initial cleanliness of water Dirty water ties up chlorine, reducing disinfectant efficacy. (4) Water ph Chlorine is more stable, and therefore more effective, when irrigation waters have a neutral ph. (5) Pathogen type. Some pathogens which have the capability of forming dormant cysts or weed seed nodules, which can allow them to survive treatment with chlorine (6) Water temperature Relatively high (>20C) or low temps (<10C) may decrease the effectiveness of chlorine. Advantages + Operation costs Since chlorine injection requires limited energy. + Capital costs Low. Most costs are for chlorine. + Exposure time Most pathogens are killed within seconds to a few minutes of chlorine exposure. + Technical components Few technical components if sodium or calcium hypochlorite is used. Page 2 of 12

+ Maintenance Low maintenance requirements. If chlorine gas is used, the injection system will need to be inspected periodically. + Adaptability Very adaptable to small and very large production systems. + Chemical control Properly performed chlorination should not affect the chemical nature of the water. + Space Aside from chlorine storage, no additional space is required. + Labor System is low labor input. Manual additions of liquid chlorine can be done. Some labor is required to routinely check equipment if chlorine gas is used. Chemicals At high concentrations, residual chlorine can kill plants. At lower concentrations, residual chlorine can cause leaf spots when water is applied to leaves. Some plants are more sensitive than others. Organic matter in water and media usually ties up excess chlorine before significant damage can occur on crops, except for in hydroponic systems or with sensitive plant species. Safety and regulation All forms of chlorine have the require caution with worker safety. Chlorine gas in particular requires additional safety training and precautions, and its use and storage may be regulated by government agencies or companies selling the product. Other forms of chlorine are hazardous in their concentrated forms. Herbicide and pesticide removal Chlorine does not break down or remove most pesticides or herbicides. Floating debris removal Larger suspended debris should be removed, so that free chlorine is not inactivated by organic matter. Dissolved organic matter Coloration due to dissolved organic matter and acids is not eliminated. Chlorination Methods. There are several forms of chlorine available for disinfections, each with methods of incorporating chlorine into irrigation water: (1) Chlorine Gas This is probably the most common and the least expensive for nursery and greenhouse sanitation. However, chlorine gas is dangerous to work with and there are many regulations that dictate its storage and use. If chlorine gas is considered, check with local agencies for the necessary permits. (2) Sodium hypochlorite Commercial bleach which has 100,000 140,000 mg chlorine/l. This is often used in the industry. (3) Calcium hypochlorite Which has 350,000 mg chlorine/l. This is occasionally used, especially if sodium buildup is a concern with the use of sodium hypochlorite. It also comes in tablet form, which may be more convenient and safer to handle. (4) Onsite generation Hypochlorous acid and chlorine dioxide can be generated onsite with specialized equipment. While the initial capital costs may be higher that other methods of chlorine, onsite generation has the advantage of eliminating the need for storage of chlorine products, thus reducing safety concerns. Note: Chlorine as a disinfectant for water has been banned recently in some European countries due to the fact that chlorine will react with humic compounds to form trihalomethanes, which are toxic to human health. SLOW SAND FILTRATION (SSF) Slow sand filtration (SSF) is a method of filtering water through fine sand (0.15 0.35 mm). Unlike coarse sand (1.0 2.0 mm), finer sands trap some pathogens and also allow beneficial microorganisms to develop on the sand surface, which kill pathogenic bacteria, fungi and certain viruses. Efficiency is based on 1) sand particle size and 2) the beneficial microorganisms that develop on the sand surface ( Schmutzdecke ), which actively breakdown pathogens via chemical, physical, and biological means. Effectiveness of treatment. Physically, pathogens can be trapped in the fine sand of the filter. The biological/chemical effect is through the beneficial organisms that develop on the surface of the sand. This living matrix has been shown to eliminate pathogens such as Phytophthora, Pythium, Cylindrocladium, Fusarium, Verticillium dahliae, Thielaviopsis, and Xanthomonas. For example, in one study with greenhouse grown tomatoes Page 3 of 12

growing in rockwool, the control of Phytophthora cinnamomi in recycled water was 100%, when fine (0.15 0.35 mm) and medium (0.20 0.80) grade sands, rather than coarse sands (0.5 1.60 mm) were used and the flow rates were low (10 cm/h compared to 30 cm/h). Based on this and other studies, flow rates of 100 to 300 liter/hour/meter 2 are recommended. The slower the flow rates, the more effective the system is in trapping and killing pathogens. Advantages + Operation costs Low energy costs since the system works through gravity. + Installation costs Low. Financial outputs are primarily for retention basins. + Chemicals no chemicals required to kill pathogens (most organisms.) + Technical components No technical components or control systems. + Maintenance Low maintenance requirements. + Adaptability Adaptable to wide range of production systems. + Pathogen removal An established SSF, where a biological active film has formed on top of the sand, will remove and/or breakdown pathogens. + Chemical control Properly maintained SSFs do not alter the ph of the effluent water. Filtration Time Longer filtration time (0.05 0.55 gpm/ft 2 ) than rapid sand filtration (2.0 20 gpm/ft 2 ). Labor Occasional cleaning maintenance requires labor. Space Requires approximately four times more surface area than rapid sand filtration. Herbicide and pesticide removal Ability to filter or breakdown herbicides and pesticides does not occur, but placement of a layer of granular activated carbon (charcoal) can adsorb certain organic herbicides and pesticides. Floating debris removal Larger suspended debris should be removed, so that intervals between cleaning filters is extended. Dissolved organic matter Coloration due to dissolved organic matter and acids is not always removed through SSF. Structure and Operational Considerations Housing. The sand filter can be housed in a cement tanks, plastic, or fiberglass drums or containers. It is recommended to have two smaller units rather than one large unit, so that one system can be shut off for cleaning, while still having the other unit operating. Filtration components. * Inlet structure The inlet for untreated runoff water should be constructed so that the sand surface is not disturbed by incoming water. * Water A constant depth of approximately 1 meter of supernatant water should be on top, the weight of which allows percolation through the sand below. Stability. The water level should not fluctuate, so that flow rates through the sand column do not change. Variable flow rates decrease filtering performance. Level. The water level should never go below the level of the sand filter. The water column protects the beneficial biologically active film/filter that develops on the sand surface. High temperatures and drying will kill or impede the activity of the biological filter. Flow rates. The flow rate should be continuous. Biological filters will die through oxygen starvation in stagnant water. * Organic film This organic film, called Schmutzdecke, is a layer of beneficial microorganisms and organic matter that naturally develop on top of the sand filter bed. This is the key component that filters and/or kills many pathogens. * Sand A layer of sand 80 150 cm (32 60 inches) deep. Particle size. Particle size of 0.15 to 0.35 mm is recommended. Uniformity coefficient. The uniformity coefficient (UC) of the sand should be less than 5, but recommended to be less than 2. The UC = d 60 /d 10, where d 60 is the sieve size, in mm, that allows passage through the sieve Page 4 of 12

of 60% of the sand (by weight), and d 10 is the sieve size, in mm, that allows passage through the sieve of 10% of the sand (by weight). * Granular activated charcoal Optional. This adsorbs most organic chemicals such as pesticides and herbicides. This can be placed in between the sand column. Placed new the surface, the activated charcoal should be replaced when the top layer of sand is replaced. * Gravel bed A layer of gravel prevents sand from blocking the treated water outlet. In more sophisticated systems, three different graded layers of gravel are used: 2 8 mm, 8 16 mm, and 16 32 mm. * Drainpipe A perforated drainage pipe is placed in the bottom layer of gravel. Additional filtering can be accomplished with a textile fabric placed over or around the drainage pipe. * Flow meter and control valve For optimal performance, flow rates should be consistently maintained with the installation of a control valve at the end of the drainpipe. Operational settings * Filtration rate 10 30 cm/hr (2.5 7.5 inches/hr). Low flow rates (10 cm/hr) are recommended when control of pathogens such as Fusarium are required, while higher flow rates of 30 cm/hr) are suitable for the control of pathogens such as Phytophthora and Pythium, which are commonly found in nurseries producing containerized woody ornamentals. * Filter capacity 100 300 L/m 2 /hr (25 75 gal/yd 2 /hr). Maintenance When flow rates diminish, the upper 1 4 cm of sand are removed along with the biological schmutzdecke layer that developed on the surface. The frequency of this maintenance is based on the cleanliness of the runoff water, water temperature, and amount of water being filtered in a given time period. Cleaning frequency intervals may range from every several weeks to every several months. RAPID SAND FILTRATION (RSF) In the literature, Rapid Sand Filtration (RSF) is usually referred to as Sand Filtration. However, for clarity of this article it will be referred to as Rapid Sand Filtration (RSF) to differentiate it from Slow Sand Filtration (SSF). RSF utilizes coarse sand (> 1.0 mm) and possibly other substrates such as activated charcoal. Unlike the finer sands utilized in SSF, RSF does not trap many pathogens; therefore, additional means of water sanitation such as chlorination, may be needed. Advantages + Operation costs Low energy costs since the system works through gravity. + Installation costs Low. Financial outputs are primarily for retention basins. + Filtration time Filtration processes are rapid (15 25 gpm/ft 2 ) compared to filtration rates for SSF (0.05 0.55 gpm/ft 2 ). + Maintenance Routine backflushing requires minimal input. + Chemical control Properly maintained RSF do not alter the ph of the effluent water. + Space Requires less surface area than tradition SSF systems. Chemicals Other chemicals such as chlorine may be required to kill pathogens. Labor Occasional cleaning maintenance requires labor. Herbicide and pesticide removal Does not filter or breakdown pesticide and herbicides, but placement of a layer of granular activated carbon (charcoal) can adsorb certain organic herbicides and pesticides. Floating debris removal Larger suspended debris should be removed, so that intervals between cleaning filters is extended. Dissolved organic matter Coloration due to dissolved organic matter and acids is not always removed. Page 5 of 12

Structure and Operational Considerations Housing. The sand filter can be housed in a cement tanks, or completely enclosed steel tanks. It is recommended to have two smaller units rather than one large unit, so that one system can be shut off for backwashing, utilizing the water from the other sand filter. Filtration components. * Inlet structure The inlet for untreated runoff water should be constructed so that the sand surface is not disturbed by incoming water. * Water A constant depth of approximately 1 meter of supernatant water should be on top, the weight of which allows percolation through the sand below. Stability. The water level should not fluctuate, so that flow rates through the sand column do not change. Variable flow rates decrease filtering performance. * Sand A layer of sand, the thickness of which is variable. Particle size. Particle size of 1 mm and larger is used. As the coarseness of the sand increases, the speed of filtration will increase but the quality of the filtered water will decrease. Uniformity coefficient. The uniformity coefficient (UC), as described in the section on SSF should be no more than 5, but no less than 2. However, parameters of this nature have not been defined for coarse sand filters used in RSF. * Granular activated charcoal Optional. This adsorbs most organic chemicals such as pesticides and herbicides. This can be placed in between the sand column. * Gravel bed Optional. A layer of gravel prevents sand from blocking the treated water outlet. In more sophisticated systems, three different graded layers of gravel are used. * Drainpipe Optional. A perforated drainage pipe may be placed in the bottom layer of gravel. Additional filtering can be accomplished with a textile fabric placed over or around the drainage pipe. * Flow meter and control valve For optimal performance, flow rates should be consistently maintained with the installation of a control valve at the end of the drainpipe. Operational settings * Filtration rate 15 25 gpm/ft 2 (900 1,500 gph/ft 2 ). Unlike SSF, lower flow rates do not assist in the control of pathogens since the sand is so coarse. * Filter capacity Filter capacity will depend on the type of system being use. However, the filtration rate of 900 1,500 gph/ft 2, makes this system suitable for the large scale nurseries (>100 acres that are using overhead irrigation. Maintenance Frequency of maintenance is dictated by the dirtiness of the water. Daily backwashing is not uncommon. The debris from the backwash may be pumped back into the reservoir, pumped into fields, or drained and composted. However, one should check with local agencies regarding regulations pertaining to the disposal of backwash debris. MEMBRANE MEDIATED FILTRATION There are basically four types of membrane mediated filtration processes: (1) Reverse Osmosis, (2) Nanofiltration, (3) Ultrafiltration, and (4) Microfiltration. All of these techniques involve passing water through membranes, which filter out unwanted substances. Pressure (energy) is required to pump the water through the membranes, with the smaller pored membranes requiring more pressure to force water through the pores compared to the larger pored membranes. The major differences between these systems are the sizes of the membrane pores. The advantages and disadvantages of these systems are described in Table 1 and the relative sizes and weights of chemicals and organisms found in irrigation water are described in Table 2. Reverse Osmosis (RO) Also called hyperfiltration, utilizes membranes with the smallest pores of the four filter systems. Because of the small pores, RO removes dissolved salts, charge particles, and compounds of molecular Page 6 of 12

weight greater than about 200 daltons (1 dalton = 1 atomic mass unit [amu]), as well as most pathogens. Nurseries that are forced to use low quality (salty) water, usually must utilize RO to remove dissolved salts. Since this process removes dissolved salts, including fertilizer, do not utilize this method after fertilizer has been added to the irrigation system; otherwise the fertilizer will be removed from the water. Nanofiltration Utilizes membranes of a larger pore size than those used in RO; however, pores are still small enough to filter out larger sized molecules ( 200 1000 daltons). These pores are usually large enough to allow chelated nutrients to pass through, since most chelates such as iron EDTA have a molecular weight under 500 daltons. Also, some charged particles may not pass through these filters. Ultrafiltration Utilizes membranes with pore sizes of approximately 1.0 to 20 nm, which are larger than pores of nanofiltration systems. No dissolved salts (fertilizer) will be removed with this system. However, ultrafiltration will still remove suspended clay and pathogens such as bacteria, nematodes and most fungal spores and some viruses. However, some smaller viruses will not be removed. Therefore, it may be necessary to do addition sanitation treatments to the water. Microfiltration Utilizes membranes with pore sizes of approximately 100 to 10,000 nm (0.0001 to 0.0100 mm). While this filtration system requires the least amount of energy to pass water through the membranes, it also does not screen out most pathogens; therefore, additional sanitation treatments will be required. This process is sometimes used before the RO process. Table 1. Physical characteristics, cost of operation, and advantages and disadvantages of four types of membranemediated filtration systems. One Dalton = 1 atomic mass unit (amu) Membrane Approximate Relative Advantages type filtration pore size cost Reverse 0.1 nm High * removes charged ions (incl. salts) * removes dissolved fertilizer Osmosis * removes compounds 250 amu * almost essentially all pathogens Nanofiltration 1.0 nm Moderate * removes some charged ions. * may remove some chelates * removes compounds 200 1000 amu * removes essentially all pathogens Ultrafiltration 1 to 20 nm Low * removes bacteria * virus may not be removed * fungal spores * removes nematodes Microfiltration 100 to 10,000 nm Lowest * requires least amount of energy * many pathogens will not be removed Table 2. Relative sizes of water and fertilizer molecules and some common pathogens sometimes found in irrigation water. Sizes of pathogens are ranges, since there are many types of viruses, bacterial and fungi. Please note that there is no correlation between weight and size, since some organism may be denser (heavier) than other organisms or chemicals of the same size. Organism/particle Weight (Daltons) z Size (nm) Water molecule 18 0.20 nm Iron EDTA chelate 526 NA virus 7,000,000 20 to 200nm E. coli Over 3,000,000,000 2000 nm Fungal spores NA 2000 to 5,000 nm nematodes NA 300,000 nm and larger z A dalton is equal to 1 atomic mass unit (amu). Maintenance * Flushing All membrane systems will require periodic flushing of membranes, the frequency of which is dependent on the cleanliness and the volume of water being treated during a given time period. Page 7 of 12

* Concentrate Disposal The residues collected will need to be disposed of, the method of which will depend on regulations in your region. * Membrane replacement Membranes will need to be replaced after a given period of usage. HEAT DISINFECTION Using heat to sanitize materials has been commonly used to sterilize root media in the nursery industry. Heat has also been used to sterilize water, especially for nurseries in European countries. Since no chemicals are added in this process, there is no concern regarding chemical storage or chemical residues. How does heat treatment work? All living organisms have a certain heat tolerance, the ability to withstand a certain maximum temperature for a specified period of time. Once this time or temperature is exceeded, the organism dies. Viruses are killed at temperatures as low as 130F (55C) if that temperature is maintained for a period of 1.5 hours. At higher temperatures, the required heat duration for organism death decreases. Procedures for heat treatment Metal heat exchangers are situated at one point along the water treatment system. The number and size of exchangers will depend on the volume of water that needs to be treated during a given time period. Prior to passing over the heat exchanges, the water ph may be acidified to 4.5 to prevent calcium accumulation on the exchangers. If the water is particularly dirty, filtration may be recommended prior to heat treatment. After heating, the water must be cooled before using on plants. Advantages + No chemical residues Since no chemicals used. + No additional chemicals Proper heating procedures will require no chemical treatment. + Maintenance No maintenance, unless calcium builds up on exchangers. + Pathogen control All pathogens will be killed. + Algae control The system will kill algae. + Plant safe If cooled sufficiently after heat treatment, there are no potential toxicities from heating. Difficult monitoring Water must be check through laboratory procedures to ensure that that all pathogens are killed. Water cooling Water must be cooled prior to usage. Lengthy treatment period Depending on the maximum temperature utilized, heating duration may take up to 1.5 hours to achieve 100% mortality of pathogens. Space allocation Since the efficacy of heat treatment is related to exposure time at a certain temperature, tanks will be needed to hold treatment water and cooling water. High operation cost For electrical source, natural gas, or oil. Water ph Water will require acidification to a ph of approximately 4.0 4.5 prior to heating (to prevent calcium buildup on heat exchangers), and then will have to be neutralized (to crop requirements) after heat treatment. Floating debris removal Does not break down or remove floating debris. Clay and silt removal Clays and other soil particles are not removed or broken down. Chelates destroyed If chelates for iron or other nutrients are used, temperatures up to 150F should not be a problem. However, accidental temperatures near boiling (212F) will denature chelates. Pesticide breakdown Please check pesticide labels for temperature stabilities in solutions. Page 8 of 12

ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT What is Ultraviolet light and how does it work. Ultraviolet light fits into the light spectrum of wavelengths from 100 400 nanometers (nm). This is the same light wavelength that is notoriously known to cause skin cancer in humans. Visible wavelengths range from 390 810 nm. The UV light, like chlorine treatments, kills the pathogens (bacteria, fungi, and viruses) suspended in water. However, since it is a light source, the water must be clean of suspended clays and organic acids. Ultra violet light sources. There are three types of UV sources: (1) low pressure mercury vapor lamps; (2) Xenon flashlamps; and (3) excimer lasers. Low pressure mercury lamps emit a wavelength of 254 nm. The use of high pressure mercury lamps may also be used, but they also emit wavelengths of 190 nm, which results in the formation of ozone which can also sanitize the water. Xenon flashlamps emit pulses of light that is a higher power source of emission. However, Xenon lamps also emit wavelengths over a larger spectrum, some of which are not UV, making Xenon lamps less energy efficient. The third source of UV light is the excimer laser, which emits pulses of light (248 nm). *Advantages +Operation costs Cost of operation will be low if the water source is clarified. +Installation costs Relatively lower for cleaner water supplies. +Chemicals No chemicals, regardless of the light source utilized. +Technical components Few technical components or control systems. +Pathogen extermination Kills bacteria and fungi and viruses. +Chemical effects No effect on water ph. +Space Small space required for installation of light source and power supply. +Algae control The system will kill algae suspended in the water source. +Nontoxic to plants UV treated water has no toxic effect on plants. * Chemical effects light sources will chemically denature chelates. Effectiveness Organic acids or clay will reduce efficacy of the UV light treatment. Herbicide and Pesticide removal Does not remove other chemicals from the water. The effects of UV light may break down light sensitive herbicides and pesticides. Consult manufacturer for specific chemical questions. Floating debris removal Does not break down or remove floating debris. Dissolved organic matter Coloration not removed. Clay and silt removal Clays and other soil particles are not removed. Exposure time UV light may require an exposure time of 30 seconds or longer, depending on the clarity of the water. Slower flow rates will be required, but lower flow rates will also reduce water turbulence and efficiency. OZONATION Ozone kills pathogens through the chemical process of oxidation. Ozone is a chemically unstable gas molecule that consists of three oxygen atoms linked together. This molecule would like to have two more electrons to become more stable, and therefore can 'take' electrons from another molecule, oxidizing that molecule. It is, therefore, considered an oxidant. In fact, ozone s oxidizing ability is twice that of chlorine. Definitions regarding oxidation and reduction processes * Oxidant = any chemical that is capable of taking electrons away from another chemical. These types of chemical reactions were originally termed 'oxidation' because it was believed that oxygen was the only chemical able to take electrons from another molecule. Chemicals other than oxygen are now known to be oxidants, but the term 'oxidation' is still used. The ability of a specific chemical environment to cause oxidation Page 9 of 12

is measured as 'redox potential' (REDOX) or 'oxidation reduction potential' (ORP). ORP values of 700 mv should provide complete disinfection. OPR values less than 300 mv are usually considered safe for most aquatic life. * Free radical = any atom or molecule that has at least one unpaired electron, but has an overall 0 charge. (It is a particle that is neither positively nor negatively charged). Even though a free radical has a charge of 0, it has the ability to take electrons from other molecules. Ozone itself is not a free radical, but when ozone breaks down, oxygen free radicals (O ) and hydroxyl free radicals (HO ) can be produced. * Antioxidant = any chemical that protects an organism from being oxidized or any chemical that inhibits the ability of oxidants to oxidize. Blueberries are good for you because they have a lot of antioxidants! Note: In the world of oxidation reactions and free radicals, two general assumptions in chemistry must be understood: (1) most compounds are stable at an electrical charge of 0, and (2) electrons are only stable as pairs. How does ozone work in disinfecting irrigation water? Ozone, like chlorine, disinfects water by oxidizing cell membranes and disrupting key physiological reactions in living organisms and oxidizing different types of chemicals suspended or dissolved in the water. In addition, as ozone breaks down, it produces free radicals (Equation 1). These free radicals also disrupt cell membranes and physiological processes by upsetting the electron balance of the cell wall structures and chemical pathways. Equation 1 O 3 + H 2 O O 2 + 2OH Ozone + water oxygen + 2 free radical hydroxyls Procedures for ozonation of irrigation water (1) Provide a relatively pure oxygen source. The use of regular air will not work since it is only 21% oxygen. (2) Electrically charge the oxygen (O 2 ), which forms ozone (O 3 ). This is often performed through corona discharge or plasma discharge units. Over 80% of the energy is wasted in the form of heat, which must be removed from the ozone generator, since heat will decompose ozone. (3) Bubble the ozone through the water source. An injection rate of 1 oz. per 1,000 gallons of water with a one hour exposure time is target rate, but may vary according to different water sources. Treated water should be maintained in a closed pressurized system to prevent off gassing of the ozone. (4) Ultraviolet light can be used to increase the rate of breakdown of ozone, which causes the rapid increase in free radical hydroxyl ( OH) groups. This acts as a better disinfectant. This technique is called 'Advanced Photo Oxidation'. (5) Deactivate excess ozone by venting through an activated charcoal filter. Advantages + Powerful disinfectant with no chemical residues Ozone breaks down to oxygen. So there are no chemical residues directly from ozone. + No additional chemicals Proper ozonation will require no other chemical control. + No chemical storage Since ozone is made on site + Easy monitoring Efficacy of system easily monitored by measuring the ORP (redox potential). + Maintenance Low maintenance unless oxygen source is not clean, then electrodes must be cleaned. + Pathogen control Most pathogens will be killed. + Algae control The system will kill algae. + Pesticide breakdown Many pesticides will be oxidized. Lengthy treatment period Depending on the amount of organic matter in water, ozone exposure may require up to 20 minutes to 1 hour to achieve 100% mortality of pathogens. Space allocation Since the efficacy of ozone is related to its concentration and exposure time, collection tanks for treated ozone water will be needed so that ozonated water can be stored long enough for effective disinfection. Page 10 of 12

High operation cost For electrical source. Increased water ph Ozone will increase water ph, so water acidification may be necessary. Effectiveness reduced with dirty water Organic matter will react with ozone, decreasing the amount of ozone available to kill pathogens. Floating debris removal Does not break down or remove floating debris. Pathogen resistance The chlamydospores and microsclerotia of some pathogens are more difficult to kill with ozone. Clay and silt removal Clays and other soil particles are not removed or broken down. Chelates destroyed If chelates for iron or other nutrients are used, ozonation may react with the chelates, precipitating the nutrient out of solution. Element precipitation Ozone may oxidize and precipitate out of solution some essential nutrients such as iron, even if chelates are not being used. Plant toxicity Ozone is toxic to plants, so ozone levels should be below toxicity levels before applying to water. COPPER IONIZATION The use of copper and silver ionization are popular methods of treating drinking water for pathogens. Historically, these methods of water treatment gained popularity after the outbreak of Lequionella pneumophila, the bacteria responsible for Legionnaires disease, which occurred at the 58th state convention of the American Legion in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania in 1976. The concentration necessary for pathogen control is approximately 100 ppb for drinking water and 20 ppb to treat pool water. How does copper ionization work? Ionization works via inserting copper coated ceramic electrodes into one point of the water system. An electric current passes through this electrode, releasing copper ions (Cu 2+ ). These positively charged copper ions are attracted to negatively charged particles, such as organic matter, silt and clay particles and to the membranes of bacteria, algae and mold. If copper binds to the organic matter, silt or clay, then the copper becomes chemically inactive. However, if the copper binds to the membranes of the organisms, the organisms die. Copper in agriculture Copper is a heavy metal that has been traditionally used in agriculture as a bactericide on crops through applications of copper sulfate, which has been used alone or with other pesticides. Though it is toxic to plants at high concentrations, copper is an essential plant nutrient, and is required at relatively low concentrations (0.002 0.003%) (20 30 ppm plant dry weight). In most nutrient formulations, especially micronutrient blends, copper is mixed into media at a rate of approximately 0.01 0.40 g/pot. For hydroponically grown crops, copper is supplied at concentrations of approximately 0.05 ppm. Because of such relatively low requirements, any additional copper that is added to a plant system, either as a pesticide or fertilizer, should be monitored so that copper toxicity is avoided. Copper ionization in nursery production Copper ionization has been used successfully in agricultural processes such as: (1) coolant pad water treatment to keep filters free of algae and (2) postharvest washing of fruits and vegetables. Information regarding copper ionization usage in irrigation water recycling systems is limited. In most copper ionization systems, recommendations are to maintain active copper ion concentrations at 0.50 to 1.5 ppm. Copper electrodes are inserted into the water system preferably after the water has been filtered of debris and suspended clay and organic matter. The number of copper electrodes required will depend on the amount of water that needs to be treated, the cleanliness of the water (presence of organic matter and suspended clay) and the size of the electrodes. Some of the models currently available will treat about 200 gallons of water per minute. Additional electrodes will be required for higher flow rates. Page 11 of 12

Advantages + Operation costs Moderate. Electrode replacement (up to $10,000) and the cost of electricity. + Installation costs Low. Financial outputs are primarily for installation of copper coated electrodes and electrical source. + Chemicals Some companies claim that no additional chemicals are required for pathogen control. However, others indicate that oxidizers such as chlorine will still be needed, but at lower concentrations. + Technical components Few technical components or control systems. + Maintenance Low (occasional replacement of copper electrodes.) + Pathogen removal Pathogens such as bacteria and fungi will be killed. + Chemical effects Copper ionization will not alter the ph of the effluent water. + Space Requires no additional land for the construction of large treatment facilities. + Algae control The system will kill algae on water and on coolant pads. Copper toxicity of water Some ornamental crops are sensitive to the copper concentrations (0.5 1.5 ppm) that are recommended to effectively treat water. No data is available on copper accumulation with long term usage of copper ionization in a closed recycling irrigation system. Copper toxicity was documented for chrysanthemum (Dendranthema), miniature rose (Rosa), and geranium (Pelargonium) at 0.32 ppm, 0.15 and 0.50 ppm, respectively. Effectiveness reduced with dirty water Since copper ions are positively charged, they will be attracted to and bind to negatively charged particles of organic matter and clay, making the copper ions inactive. Therefore, greater injection (release rates) of copper ions from electrodes will be needed to keep the copper ions at concentrations effective to kill pathogens. Herbicide and Pesticide removal Does not remove other chemicals from the water. Floating debris removal Does not break down or remove floating debris. Dissolved organic matter Coloration due to dissolved organic matter and acids is not removed from the water. Clay and silt removal Clays and other soil particles are not effectively removed with copper ionization. Copper accumulation in closed recycling systems Copper will bind to organic matter and clay that settles out in reservoirs. Therefore, if this sludge is recycled back into the media, copper concentrations in the sludge could be toxic to some crops. Tests should be performed to check copper concentrations of the sludge and media before use on crops. Copper toxicity symptoms Leaves: Reddish brown lesions, which coalesce in severe cases. Roots: Stunting and death of root tips and an increased production of lateral roots. Under severe toxicity the entire root system will senesce. Page 12 of 12