OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project INFORMATION BRIEF Deliverables

Similar documents
Explanatory Statement

Information Brief. OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project Final Reports

BACKGROUND BRIEF INCLUSIVE FRAMEWORK FOR BEPS IMPLEMENTATION. Executive Summary

BEPS within the EU Framework Compatibility and Implementation

Update on tax policy developments in the OECD (the 'BEPS' initiative) EC (agressive tax planning) and the Dutch response

Action 15: A Mandate for the Development of a Multilateral Instrument on Tax Treaty Measures to Tackle BEPS

Countering Harmful Tax Practices More Effectively, Taking into Account Transparency and Substance

Subcommittee on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Issues for Developing Countries

13. PE & CF Conference Challenges of BEPS for PE Managers and Funds

The 2014 OECD International Tax Conference: OECD-U.S. Business Dialogue on International Tax Washington, DC June 2-3, 2014

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL. on tax transparency to fight tax evasion and avoidance

Executive Summaries. OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project Final Reports

Explanatory Statement

Tax Reform in Brazil and the U.S.

Global Tax and Legal September OECD s BEPS initiative a global survey Multinational survey results

Action Plan on Base Erosion. and Profit Shifting

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

Implementing a Diverted Profits Tax

Preventing the Granting of Treaty Benefits in

BEPS and the Digital Economy

Public consultation on further corporate tax transparency

Overview of the OECD work on transfer pricing

EU Initiatives Regarding Aggressive Tax Planning Danmarks Skatteadvokater 26. May CORIT

Background and introduction

FOLLOW UP WORK ON BEPS ACTION 6: PREVENTING TREATY ABUSE

Striking the right balance PwC Budget Seminar 1 March 2013 Transfer pricing plenary

Public consultation on further corporate tax transparency

The 2013 OECD International Tax Conference: OECD-U.S. Business Dialogue on International Tax Washington, DC June 3-4, 2013

OECD BASE EROSION AND PROFIT SHIFTING PROJECT IN AN IRISH CONTEXT

A small country perspective on international taxation

OECD BEPS Project - Impact on UK tax law. Munich, 21 April 2016

FIXING THE CRACKS IN TAX: A PLAN OF ACTION

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Accompanying the document

Proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE. laying down rules against tax avoidance practices that directly affect the functioning of the internal market

OECD INTERNATIONAL VAT/GST GUIDELINES

Restoring the Balance

PART 2 OF A REPORT TO G20 DEVELOPMENT WORKING GROUP ON THE IMPACT OF BEPS IN LOW INCOME COUNTRIES 13 AUGUST 2014

JURISDICTIONS AND AGGRESSIVE TAX PLANNING AND A POSSIBLE STRATEGY AT EU LEVEL SEMINAR JULY

Tax considerations for Pharmaceutical & Life Sciences Industry 27 November November 2013

THE CHANGING ENVIRONMENT FOR TRANSFER PRICING DOCUMENTATION. Action 13 documentation and reporting requirements

G20 ANTI-CORRUPTION WORKING GROUP PROGRESS REPORT 2013

Addressing the Tax Challenges of the Digital Economy

US Inbound Newsalert A Washington National Tax Services (WNTS) Publication

New United Kingdom Tax on Cross-Border Tax Planning: Diverted Profits Tax

EMEA TMC client conference Country-by-country reporting. The Crystal, London 9-10 June 2015

TAX LAWS AMENDMENT (TAX INTEGRITY MULTINATIONAL ANTI-AVOIDANCE LAW) BILL 2015 EXPOSURE DRAFT EXPLANATORY MATERIAL

BEPS ACTION 7: PREVENTING THE ARTIFICIAL AVOIDANCE OF PE STATUS

News Flash Hong Kong Tax. November 2015 Issue 10. In brief. In detail.

INTERNATIONAL VAT/GST GUIDELINES

Position statement on corporate tax avoidance and tax transparency 18 december 2015

Making Dispute Resolution Mechanisms More Effective

Corporate tax evasion, avoidance and competition:

Action 13: Guidance on the Implementation of Transfer Pricing Documentation and Country-by-Country Reporting

Public consultation on the Re-launch of the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB)

Tax Policy Bulletin. OECD initiative on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS)

Global Alliance for Tax Justice

RECOMMENDATIONS ON FRAMEWORKS TO SUPPORT DEVELOPMENT OF NATIONAL TAX POLICY REFORM AGENDAS. - Working Group 3 -

Is a sustainable tax on international profit feasible? Michael Devereux Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation

Insurance Europe response to the EC consultation on the re-launch of the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB)

GOVERNANCE (TAX JUSTICE) POLICY PAPERS C20 TURKEY

KPMG Tax Review: OECD Report on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting kpmg.com/tax

TREATY ENTITLEMENT OF NON-CIV FUNDS

Tax Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) and International Economic Law*

Guidance on Transfer Pricing Documentation and Country-by-Country Reporting

THE OECD S PROJECT ON HARMFUL TAX PRACTICES: 2006 UPDATE ON PROGRESS IN MEMBER COUNTRIES

Tax insights G20 Brisbane and BEPS: Where to from here?

Irish Tax Institute. Response to OECD Discussion Draft: Make Dispute Resolution Mechanisms More Effective

BEPS ACTION 6: PREVENT TREATY ABUSE

Taxing Multinationals: Recent developments in the EU

2010 REPORT ON THE ATTRIBUTION OF PROFITS TO PERMANENT ESTABLISHMENTS

Legal TAX LAW IMF TECHNICAL NOTE INTRODUCING A GENERAL ANTI-AVOIDANCE RULE (GAAR) Christophe Waerzeggers I Cory Hillier VOLUME 1 01 I 2016

B E P S A C T I O N P L A N

BEPS ACTION 4: INTEREST DEDUCTIONS AND OTHER FINANCIAL PAYMENTS

ADDRESSING INFORMATION GAPS ON PRICES OF MINERAL PRODUCTS

WhatWhat Does It Mean To Be Successful In Business?

tax update October 2014

Hong Kong s Double Tax Treaty Network

Guidance on the Implementation of Country-by-Country Reporting BEPS ACTION 13

Allow me to point out ten ways this can be done.

Highlights and Achievements

Economic and Social Council

BEPS Action 13: Transfer Pricing Documentation and Country-by-Country Reporting

How To Limit Tax Competition In Swissitzerland

NEGOTIATING FRAMEWORK FOR TURKEY. Principles governing the negotiations

Taxation. Corporate Taxes: Is global digital retailing eroding Australia s tax base?

between Italy and Switzerland

Multinationals will be concerned about additional complexity in controlled foreign company proposals

OECD Tax Alert. BEPS action 2: Neutralizing the effects of hybrid mismatch arrangements. OECD proposals. International Tax. 16 October 2015.

2015 Proposed Draft Provisions to US Model Income Tax Treaty: Impact on Innovation, Licensing and Digital Economy

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE

Taxation and Electronic Commerce

Italian corporate income tax for foreign investors

G20-OECD BEPS Action Plan

Budget 2016 CHANGES IN DUTCH TAXATION FOR sconti.com

Loan pricing and financial structuring

Profits from Trading in and Developing UK Land

COLLECTING WHAT IS DUE: FOR FAIR AND EFFECTIVE TAX SYSTEMS IN EUROPE

United Nations Capacity Development Programme on International Tax Cooperation

CONSOLIDATED APPLICATION NOTE

Transcription:

OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project INFORMATION BRIEF 2014 Deliverables

Further information To find out more about the BEPS Project, please visit our website www.oecd.org/tax/beps.htm, or contact: Pascal Saint-Amans, Director, OECD Centre for Tax Policy and Administration E-mail: Pascal.Saint-Amans@oecd.org Raffaele Russo, Head of the BEPS Project, OECD Centre for Tax Policy and Administration E-mail: Raffaele.Russo@oecd.org 3

Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Globalisation has opened up opportunities for multinational enterprises to greatly reduce the taxes they pay, sometimes close to zero by moving their profits abroad. Gaps and mismatches in the current, outdated tax rules can make profits disappear for tax purposes, or allow the shifting of profits to no- or low-tax locations where the business has little or no economic activity. These activities are referred to as base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS). Moreover, the growing importance of services in the economy, and of digital products and services which can often be delivered over the internet has made BEPS much easier. In most cases these strategies are legal. BEPS is not a problem created by one or more specific companies which are legally taking advantage of opportunities to reduce their overall tax liability. Apart from some cases of blatant abuses, the issues lie with the tax rules themselves. These unintended effects of the interaction between domestic and international tax rules have raised serious issues they are a source of distortion between taxpayers, affect trust in the integrity of the tax system, an issue particularly important at a time of fiscal consolidation and social hardship. They result in a loss of revenue for governments that could otherwise be invested to support resilient and balanced growth. In developing countries, where reliance on corporate tax as a source of revenue is generally higher, the potential impacts are particularly stark. From Inception to Action For decades, the OECD has been promoting the elimination of double taxation on cross border trade and investments. Eliminating double taxation remains a key objective of the Organisation as it is conducive to cross border trade and investments, which spur growth and create jobs. However, with the current rules not keeping pace with modern business practices in a global economy, the rules aimed at eliminating double taxation, have also facilitated double non-taxation. At the Los Cabos G20 Leaders Summit in November 2012, the OECD received a mandate to work on tackling BEPS issues. Following the Declaration on BEPS adopted at the 2013 OECD Ministerial Council Meeting and at the request of G20 Finance Ministers, the OECD launched the BEPS Action Plan, which was fully endorsed by G20 Leaders in Saint Petersburg in September 2013. The BEPS Action Plan is designed to fix the current deficiencies of the international tax system, and identifies 15 specific actions needed to equip countries with the domestic and international instruments aligned with a principled approach, to address this challenge. The plan recognises the importance of addressing the borderless digital economy, and will develop a new set of standards to prevent BEPS issues such as double non-taxation through hybrid mismatch arrangements, base erosion via interest deductions, or artificial profit shifting through transfer pricing. This will require greater transparency, closer international co-operation and a coherent approach to implementation. It highlights the importance of more certainty and consistency for taxpayers as well as the need to establish more effective dispute resolution mechanisms between tax administrations. Working Together The BEPS Project marks a turning point in the history of international co-operation on taxation. The OECD Committee on Fiscal Affairs (CFA), which is the steering body for the BEPS Project, brings together 44 countries on an equal footing: all OECD members and the BEPS Associates (8-non-OECD G20 and OECD accession countries: Argentina, Brazil, China, Colombia, India, Indonesia, Latvia, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa). The measures adopted by the CFA, such as the 2014 deliverables, are developed by technical working groups made up of expert officials from OECD and G20 members, as well as inputs from developing countries, and based on extensive consultations with business, trade unions, civil society organisations and academics. More than 85 low and middle 4

income countries have participated in the BEPS consultation process (from a total of 142 jurisdictions which have been involved in the Project to date), more than 3 500 pages of comments on the discussion drafts were received and five public consultations were held. Three BEPS webcasts have also taken place which have attracted over 10 000 viewers. 2014 Deliverables OECD members and the BEPS Associates have now agreed by consensus the first seven deliverables of the Action Plan. Implementation of the measures will go a long way in addressing some of the key BEPS challenges, with the 2014 deliverables including model rules to neutralise hybrid mismatches (Action 2), putting an end to costly multiple deductions for a single expense or deductions in one country without corresponding taxation in another. The work under Action 5 targets harmful tax practices, focusing on the distortionary influence of tax on the location of service activities with progress being made on the transparency of tax rulings and a methodology to assess substantial activity in intellectual property, and other, preferential regimes. Treaty shopping and other forms of treaty abuse have been targeted under Action 6, with all countries agreeing that anti-treaty abuse provisions should be included in tax treaties. Under Action 8, the work on ensuring that value creation is aligned with taxation under transfer pricing rules has begun with a focus on intangibles and a consensus was reached that the artificial shifting of profits to no or low-tax jurisdictions, for example through cash boxes, can no longer be tolerated. This work on the transfer pricing rules will continue to progress, including under Actions 9 and 10 as foreseen in the Action Plan, in 2015. Major progress has been achieved in improving transparency for tax administrations while limiting compliance costs for businesses, with agreement reached on transfer pricing documentation, including country by country reporting of the profits, economic activity and taxes of multinational enterprises. More broadly, there has been a clarification of the tax challenges raised by the digital economy, which will see this work given further specific attention through 2015. Overall, the issue of implementation of the BEPS measures has seen countries agree on the feasibility of implementing BEPS measures through a multilateral instrument, under Action 15. These measures across seven areas of the Action Plan are an important step forward in fighting BEPS. Viewed together with the 2015 deliverables, and once implemented to double tax treaties and domestic laws, the measures will ensure the coherence of corporate tax systems in a cross-border environment, introduce substance requirements in the area of tax treaties and transfer pricing, and ensure transparency while promoting certainty and predictability. What s next The delivery of the 2014 BEPS outputs shows how OECD and G20 members working together have brought a consensus approach to important reforms with a worldwide impact. Work on the remaining elements of the BEPS Action Plan will now continue, through technical working parties, enhanced and targeted engagement with developing countries focusing on their priority BEPS issues, as well as dialogue with business, civil society, academics and other international and regional organisations. This diversity of input assists policy makers as they continue to improve their understanding of the different perspectives on these challenging issues, and craft the most appropriate solutions. The next outputs of the BEPS Project are due to be delivered in September and December 2015. In parallel, the 2014 deliverables will be further refined to ensure that any outstanding technical issues are addressed, including interaction with the 2015 deliverables, and that implementation and practical guidance is developed with regard to all issues. 5

The 2015 deliverables include work to develop recommendations on the following areas: Action 3: on the design of effective controlled foreign company (CFC) rules, to provide countries with tools to tackle the large amounts of untaxed profits booked offshore. Action 4: regarding rules that limit base erosion via interest deductions and other financial payments. Action 5: to continue work on preventing harmful tax practices, with a specific focus on preferential intellectual property regimes. Action 7: on preventing the artificial avoidance of permanent establishment (PE) status, an issue of particular importance for developing and emerging economies. Actions 8-10: on ensuring outcomes from transfer pricing rules are in line with value creation, relating to intangibles, risks and capital and other high risk transactions. Action 11: on methodologies to collect data and carry out economic analysis on BEPS, including its spillover effects across countries. Action 12: on domestic rules requiring the disclosure of aggressive tax planning arrangements. Action 14: to enhance the effectiveness of dispute resolution mechanisms among tax administrations The CFA will also consider in January 2015, a draft mandate for an international conference for the negotiation of a multilateral convention to streamline the implementation of the BEPS Action Plan (Action 15). The BEPS Project will result in an overall package which takes a comprehensive and principled approach to the shared goal of the OECD Members and BEPS Associates: a fairer international tax system, which will support sustainable and balanced growth. Recommended reading About BEPS What the BEPS are we talking about? (OECD, 2013) www.oecd.org/tax/what-the-beps-are-we-talking-about.htm Action Plan on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (OECD, 2013) www.oecd.org/ctp/bepsactionplan.pdf Addressing Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (OECD, 2013) www.oecd.org/tax/beps-reports.htm About the 2014 BEPS Deliverables Press release, Explanatory Statement, Reports www.oecd.org/tax/beps-2014-deliverables.htm Frequently asked questions www.oecd.org/ctp/beps-frequentlyaskedquestions.htm 6