Electronic Data Exchange Moving Forward. Lori A. Havener, CTR Program Manager of Standards

Similar documents
Medical Informatic Basics for the Cancer Registry

Introduction to the National Program of Cancer Registries Modeling Electronic Reporting Project (NPCR-MERP)

National Cancer Institute

FCDS Webinar Meaningful Use

Electronic Health Records: The Intersection of Public Health Surveillance and Clinical Medicine

An Introduction to Health Level 7

Health Care Information System Standards

Meaningful Use Stage 2 Certification: A Guide for EHR Product Managers

Health Care Delivery and Information Technology (HIT) Subcommittee : DRAFT Recommendations

Shelly Spiro, Executive Director, Pharmacy HIT Collaborative reports no relevant financial relationships.

Advancing Laboratory Interoperability in Health IT

Meaningful use. Meaningful data. Meaningful care. The 3M Healthcare Data Dictionary: Enabling effective health information exchange

Meaningful Use Stage 2 as it Relates to the Lab Implementing the Public Health Agency Interface. Interface

Eligible Professionals please see the document: MEDITECH Prepares You for Stage 2 of Meaningful Use: Eligible Professionals.

Public Health 101 Series

Standardized Terminologies Used in the Learning Health System

Meaningful use. Meaningful data. Meaningful care. The 3M Healthcare Data Dictionary: Standardizing lab data to LOINC for meaningful use

reporting to the Cancer Medical Malware

Summary of the Proposed Rule for the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentive Program (Eligible Professionals only)

NATIONAL CENTER FOR PUBLIC HEALTH INFORMATICS (CPE)

How Electronic Health Records Might Change Birth Defects Surveillance (and what to do about it!)

ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS/NATIONAL HEALTH INFORMATION INFRASTRUCTURE: LEGAL ISSUES IN HIPAA AND EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES

NAACCR 2015 Annual Conference Sandy Jones June 18, 2015

Certification Guidance for EHR Technology Developers Serving Health Care Providers Ineligible for Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Payments

Use of Electronic Health Records in Clinical Research: Core Research Data Element Exchange Detailed Use Case April 23 rd, 2009

IHE Australia Workshops July Prepared by: Heather Grain Chair: Standards Australia IT14 Health Informatics and Ehealth Education

Welcome to the Meaningful Use and Data Analytics PowerPoint presentation in the Data Analytics Toolkit. In this presentation, you will be introduced

Incentives to Accelerate EHR Adoption

International HL7 Interoperability Conference - IHIC 2010

How To Use A Pharmacy To Help Your Health Care System

Medicare and Medicaid Programs; EHR Incentive Programs

Mark Anderson, FHIMSS, CPHIMSS Healthcare IT Futurist

Increase Participation Through Partial Incentives

Farzad Mostashari, M.D., ScM.

Electronic Public Health Case Reporting: Current & Future Possibilities. Joint Public Health Forum & CDC Nationwide Call October 16, 2014

Data Integrity in an Era of EHRs, HIEs, and HIPAA: A Health Information Management Perspective

Meaningful Use Objectives

Meaningful Use and Lab Related Requirements

Towards Smarter Healthcare: New Healthcare IT Curriculum

THE STIMULUS AND STANDARDS. John D. Halamka MD

Standards. September 9, 2011

The Decade of Health Information Technology Framework for Strategic Action

Immunization Use Case v1.1

The American Academy of Ophthalmology Adopts SNOMED CT as its Official Clinical Terminology

ONTARIO EHR INTEROPERABILITY STANDARDS WHY STANDARDS MATTER

LIS Vendor Landscape and Options for Meeting ELR Meaningful Use

Creating a national electronic health record: The Canada Health Infoway experience

Re: Comments on 2015 Interoperability Standards Advisory Best Available Standards and Implementation Specifications

Meaningful Use. Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs

Draft Pan-Canadian Primary Health Care Electronic Medical Record Content Standard, Version 2.0 (PHC EMR CS) Frequently Asked Questions

Understanding Meaningful Use with a Focus on Testing the HL7 V2 Messaging Standards

AHIMA Curriculum Map Health Information Management Associate Degree Approved by AHIMA Education Strategy Committee February 2011

HIT Standards Committee Transitional Vocabulary Task Force Wednesday October 14th, 2015, 10:30 A.M. 12:00 P.M. Et

What is your vision of population/public health practice in an era when the health care of all Americans is supported by EHRs?

HITECH Act Update: An Overview of the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Regulations

Clinical Research Informatics: Challenges And Trends


Understanding Meaningful Use. Review of Part 1 and Part 2

MED 2400 MEDICAL INFORMATICS FUNDAMENTALS

Damon A. Ferlazzo, MPA Clinical Use and Benefits of State Immunization Information Systems August 21, 2014

Comments from ISDS on proposed rule for meaningful use March 15, 2010 Introduction Structure of comments

ehr Sharable Data Vicky Fung Senior Health Informatician ehr Information Standards Office

Public Health Case Reporting Using Consolidated Clinical Data Architecture (C-CDA) Pilot

Data Standards for Electronic Health Records Data Standards in Clinical Trials: Maximizing Innova>on by Standardizing October 19, 2012

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs- Past, Present, & Future. Travis Broome, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 12/18/2012

Agenda. What is Meaningful Use? Stage 2 - Meaningful Use Core Set. Stage 2 - Menu Set. Clinical Quality Measures (CQM) Clinical Considerations

April 3, Dear Dr. DeSalvo:

West Virginia Information Technology Summit. November 4, 2009

How To Use An Electronic Medical Record

Next Generation Registries: Project INSPIRE

STAGE 2 of the EHR Incentive Programs

Defense Healthcare Management Systems

Meaningful Use as the Foundation of the Medical Home

1/16/2015 HOW CLINICAL EDUCATORS CAN DISCLOSURE LEARNING OBJECTIVES MAKE MEANINGFUL USE MEANINGFUL. We have no financial disclosures

Theodoros. N. Arvanitis, RT, DPhil, CEng, MIET, MIEEE, AMIA, FRSM

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

RE: Comments on Discussion Draft Ensuring Interoperability of Qualified Electronic Health Records.

Meaningful Use - The Basics

FHIM Model Content Overview

Contact: Barbara J Stout RN, BSC Implementation Specialist University of Kentucky Regional Extension Center

New Jersey Department of Health. Electronic Laboratory Reporting On-Boarding Manual. Version 1.4

HIE Ready 2.0 SPECIFICATIONS MATRIX. Product Name: Version Number: Preferred Message and Trigger

FY Strategic Plan

PUBLIC HEALTH MU OBJECTIVES

Where to Begin? Auditing the Current EHR System

ALTARUM. Modernizing Health Care: Leveraging Our Regional Extension Centers

Open Source Software Tools for Electronic Clinical Quality Measures

CDC Healthcare Information Management Systems Society 2012 White Paper. CDC Connecting to Healthcare through Interoperability

Meaningful Use and Public Health

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Focus on Stage 2. Kim Davis-Allen, Outreach Coordinator

Accelerating Clinical Trials Through Shared Access to Patient Records

COMMUNICATIONS PLAN FOR ELECTRONIC LABORATORY REPORTING COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT PLAN

Joseph D. Rogers. Team Lead National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

The Big Picture: IDNT in Electronic Records Glossary

Draft Strategic Plan for FY

Achieving Meaningful Use with Centricity EMR

United States HIT Case Study

MEDICAL INFORMATICS. Sorana D. Bolboacă

Client Alert. CMS Releases Proposed Rule On Meaningful Use Of Electronic Health Record Technology

I n t e r S y S t e m S W h I t e P a P e r F O R H E A L T H C A R E IT E X E C U T I V E S. In accountable care

Transcription:

Electronic Data Exchange Moving Forward Lori A. Havener, CTR Program Manager of Standards

2004 State of the Union Address President Bush addressed the need for computerized health records. President Bush stated that most Americans should have electronic medical records within 10 years.

Health Care Technology Advancements

Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT ) SNOMED CT is a dynamic, scientifically validated clinical health care terminology and infrastructure that makes health care knowledge more usable and accessible.

Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT ) SNOMED CT core terminology provides a common language that enables a consistent way of capturing, sharing, and aggregating health data across specialties and sites of care.

Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT ) Applications for SNOMED CT: Electronic medical records Medical research studies Clinical trials Disease surveillance Etc.

Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT ) SNOMED CT core content is now available, free of charge, through the National Library of Medicine's (NLM) Unified Medical Language System (UMLS ) Metathesaurus

Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT ) For more information about SNOMED CT: http://www.snomed snomed.org/.org/snomedct

Health Level Seven (HL7) Develops standards for exchange, management and integration of data that supports clinical patient care and the management, delivery, and evaluation of healthcare services. Specifically, to create flexible, cost effective approaches, standards, guidelines, methodologies, and related services for interoperability between healthcare information services.

HL7 In 2001, HL7 established an Electronic Health Record (EHR) technical committee to begin efforts on EHR systems. In 2003, the EHR technical committee began development of a functional model of the EHR system (the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services was the catalyst for accelerating the development of this model).

HL7 Two year contract with the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to provide government agencies and the private sector with an implementation guide for the transmission of patient information between disparate EHR systems.

HL7 Three year contract with NLM: Make HL7 vocabularies available from within the Universal Medical Language System (UMLS) Replace HL7 vocabularies with designated Consolidated Health Initiative (CHI) vocabularies, where possible Describe how vocabulary bindings from specific HL7 messages to the UMLS will occur.

HL7 For more information about HL7: http://www.hl7.org

Cancer Biomedical Informatics Grid (cabig) The National Cancer Institute (NCI) provides coordinating supervision of cabig and works in collaboration with partners in the public, private, and academic sectors.

cabig An informatics infrastructure that will connect teams of cancer and biomedical researchers together to enable them to better develop and share tools and data in an open environment with common standards.

cabig Three domain workspaces Clinical trial management systems Integrative cancer research Tissue banks and pathology tools Two cross-cutting cutting workspaces Architecture workspace Vocabularies and common data elements workspace

cabig Strategic Level Working Groups Training Strategic Planning Data Sharing and Intellectual Capital

cabig For more information about cabig http://cabig cabig.nci.nih.gov

Public Health Information Network (PHIN) The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) developed PHIN to improve public health communications by using and promoting health data and technology standards.

PHIN Enables consistent exchange of response, health, and disease tracking data between public health partners.

PHIN Five key components: Detection and monitoring Data analysis Knowledge management Alerting and communications Response

PHIN Includes a number of component systems including the National Electronic Disease Surveillance Systems (NEDSS).

NEDSS A public health initiative that promotes the use of data and information system standards to advance the development of efficient, integrated, and interoperable surveillance systems at federal, state, and local levels.

PHIN/NEDSS For more information about PHIN: http://www.cdc.gov/phin/ For more information about NEDSS: http://www.cdc cdc.gov/nedss/

Modeling Electronic Reporting Project The purpose of this National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) project is to develop a model using the Unified Modeling Language (UML) to transmit data within the hospital s electronic medical record and hospital database system to both the hospital and central cancer registries.

Modeling Electronic Reporting Project The Division of Quality Health Care of the Virginia Commonwealth University Hospital system is developing an electronic medical record system and has systems in place to glean cancer related information.

NAACCR Advancements

NAACCR Data Exchange Record Layout ASCII, fixed length, flat file format Common language for cancer registry systems 397 data items, 6694 characters OUTDATED

Electronic Data Exchange...Moving Forward Review current data exchange layout and discuss alternative electronic data transmissions.

NAACCR Overarching Goals and Tasks The need to move toward electronic, real time case reporting from all reporting sources that includes demographic information, disease codes, and pathology results. (Highest Priority)

Electronic Data Exchange...Moving Forward Real Time Reporting Work Group Develop a report summarizing the past, current, and future of real time reporting efforts. Provide recommendations to NAACCR Board steps needed to keep involved in national efforts to develop interoperable EHRs.

Electronic Data Exchange...Moving Forward Develop NAACCR Standards for Cancer Registries Volume V: Pathology Laboratory Electronic Reporting.

Electronic Data Exchange...Moving Forward NAACCR staff participate in HL7 trainings and work group meetings. EHR Technical Committee PHER Special Interest Group

Electronic Data Exchange...Moving Forward NAACCR staff participate in SNOMED meetings. Surgical Pathology Working Group

How do we bring all of these technological advancements together to move the cancer community forward?

C-Change C-Change Change is comprised of the nation's key cancer leaders from government, business, and nonprofit sectors.

C-Change The mission of C-Change C Change is to leverage the combined expertise and resources of its members to eliminate cancer as a (major) public health problem at the earliest possible time.

C-Change In 2004, C-Change C Change sponsored a Cancer Surveillance and Information Summit that brought together 86 experts from the broad field of cancer surveillance. Purpose: to seek ways to reduce the burden from cancer through the full application of information.

C-Change The future will bring some fundamental changes in cancer surveillance that will be advanced by information technology, the increased use of the Internet, and new regulations governing personal privacy.

C-Change The future holds the promise of addressing the demands of clinicians eager for information, by researchers increasing the depth and breath of information, and by the public seeking to better understand the risks of cancer and the options available to them.

C-Change Summit Conference Recommendations Seven primary recommendations: Data Standards: the recent agreement by major registries and coding systems on common stage specifications is a model for future action in data standardization.

C-Change Summit Conference Recommendations Expanded Scope for Cancer Surveillance: an expanded vision for cancer surveillance goes beyond cancer registration to include, risk factor data, pre-neoplastic events, quality indicators, and patient- centered outcomes.

C-Change Summit Conference Recommendations Leadership: the activity of collecting and disseminating cancer surveillance information requires leadership and financial support. Central leadership is needed to guide activities by individual agencies and organizations.

C-Change Summit Conference Recommendations Incentives: needed for participation in expanded surveillance activities. Health Disparities: need to be addressed across the spectrum of cancer surveillance by adopting measures of SES as well as age, gender, race and ethnicity into national dataset and medical record systems.

C-Change Summit Conference Recommendations Surveillance Tools: surveillance data must be more readily available for clinical and public health practice. Legislative Mandate: may be needed to authorize the collection of patient-centered data and other data elements under an expanded scope of surveillance.

C-Change Summit Conference Recommendations The next step is to engage critical players in implementing the top priority, that of achieving standards across the cancer surveillance enterprise including coding, data collection, procedures, and information dissemination.

C-Change Summit Conference Recommendations Access to Quality Cancer Care Team has taken on this task and is proceeding with a major planning effort in the current year for a meeting to address the critical issues involved in setting standards for cancer surveillance and information.

Electronic Data Exchange...Moving Forward What will be the next steps for NAACCR members and committees? Where do we go from here?