1. The Spanish University System The Spanish University System maintains a dual organisation based on both public and private institutions.

Similar documents
ECA Code of Good Practice and ANECA

Akkreditierung goes Europe

AUDIT PROGRAMME. Guide to the design of internal quality assurance systems in higher education. Document 01 V /06/07

External quality assurance and accreditation in the European Union: ACSUG experience

ANECA SELF-EVALUATION REPORT ACCORDING TO THE STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE IN THE EUROPEAN HIGHER EDUCATION AREA

Application Form for Accreditation Agencies Authorisation to award the EUR-ACE Label

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a RECOMMENDATION OF THE COUNCIL AND OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

REGULATIONS LUISS BUSINESS SCHOOL. SECTION I Purpose and Scope

Bologna process and new opportunities for cooperation

Quality Assurance in University of Alicante

Quality Assurance in Higher Education

The European Accreditation Agency for Public Health Education (EAAPHE)

National Report Sweden - Report on the Swedish follow-up of the Bologna Declaration and the Prague Communiqué

REQUIREMENTS. for OMAN S SYSTEM OF QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION

Realising the European Higher Education Area

EUROPEAN JOINT MASTER PROGRAMME. Opening ceremony. 12 October 2015 Budapest, Hungary

Drawing up and assessment of proposals for officially recognised postgraduate programmes and degrees. Academic Year

enqa report to ministers responsible for higher education in the ehea

Strategy of the Federal and Länder Ministers of Science. for the Internationalisation of the Higher Education Institutions.

European Standards and Guidelines in a Nordic Perspective

EUR-ACE. Framework Standards for the Accreditation of Engineering Programmes. Foreword Programme Outcomes for Accreditation...

European Approach for Quality Assurance of Joint Programmes

CONCEPTION OF AN INTERNAL (STUDIES) QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OF ŠIAULIAI UNIVERSITY

BOLOGNA PROCESS TEMPLATE FOR NATIONAL REPORTS: A. Background information on your Higher Education system. Country

IHEQN. Irish Higher Education Quality Network

Erasmus Mundus Joint Doctoral Programmes Management. SINCHEM Kick-Off Meeting Bologna 13/02/2013

EUR-ACE Framework Standards and Guidelines

Evaluation EMBA in Hospitality Administration Ecole hôtelière de Lausanne (HES-SO)

The European Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning (EQF)

Report and Commentary on the Eurodoc Statement of Standards in the Assessment, Expectations and Outcomes of Doctoral Programmes in Europe

Implementation of the Bologna Goals in Denmark

Final Report November 2006* *Note: This version of the report has been amended only to maintain working web references and hyperlinks. June 2009.

ENQA Review 2011: Empfehlungen und deren Umsetzung durch das OAQ / 1. Implementation of the ENQA recommendations on ESG Part 2

QUALITY ASSURANCE POLICY

Evaluation of NOKUT The Norwegian Agency for Quality Assurance in Education

An approach to accreditation: the path of the Italian Higher Education

GLOBED Master on Education Policies for Global Development

NASM. AEC NASM Statement on the Characteristics for Quality Assurance in the Field of Music

Reforms in higher education and research

Towards More Transparency in Higher Education. The Dutch National Qualifications Framework

Realising the European Higher Education Area - Achieving the Goals. Conference of European Higher Education Ministers


STATUTE OF THE POLISH ACCREDITATION COMMITTEE

QUALITY IN EVERYDAY WORK. Quality Guide for the Teacher Education College Version 2.7

BEST PRACTICE IN ACCREDITATION OF ENGINEERING PROGRAMMES: AN EXEMPLAR

Maastricht Communiqué. on the Future Priorities of Enhanced European Cooperation in Vocational Education and Training (VET)

From International Relations to Internationalisation. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya Vicepresidency for International Policy Octubre 2008

CHAPTER 10 PROMOTING CROSS-BORDER RECOGNITION AND MOBILITY DEVELOPMENTS IN THE NETHERLANDS. Jindra Divis, Astrid Scholten and Anne Marie Mak

FIBAA Accreditation Regulations for Dual Degree Programs

Review of NOKUT the Norwegian Agency for Quality Assurance in Education Report of the ENQA Panel May, 2013

ENQA Review of the Quality Assurance Agency for the University System in Castilla y León (ACSUCYL) Report of the review panel

The referencing of the Norwegian Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning to the European Qualifications Framework (EQF) and selfcertification

Recent Trends and Discussions in Assessing Quality in Doctoral Education in Europe

Screening report Turkey

Nordic Master - Programme Guide 2015

Quality Assurance in Joint Study Programs

Guidelines of the Swiss University Conference for Academic Accreditation in Switzerland

INTRODUCTION. I. Assessment of Teaching Staff II. Assessment of Degrees III. Assessment of Research IV. Further Initiatives for Enhancing Quality

Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG)

Course description metadata (CDM) : A relevant and challenging standard for Universities

Act on the education and recruitment of teachers and administrators of preschools, compulsory schools and upper secondary schools

The Polish State Accreditation Committee

EPOKA UNIVERSITY DIRECTIVE ON SPECIAL STUDENTS

QUALITY IN EVERYDAY WORK

With the support of the Lifelong Learning Programme of the European Union EURO-INF

Legislative reforms Higher Education, The Netherlands Warsaw 4th November 2004

NATIONAL REPORT. European Conference of Ministers of Higher Education. Berlin, September 2003 GENERAL DIRECTORATE OF UNIVERSITIES

Preparing the Creation of a Quality Assurance Agency - The Lebanese Experience - Tempus-TLQAA project C. Mokbel

stra tegy STRATEGY OF SCHOOL OF BUSINESS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES AARHUS UNIVERSITY

Graz University of Technology

Guidelines of the Swiss University Conference for Academic Accreditation in Switzerland

Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG)

MIMT The Michelsen Centre for Industrial Measurement Science and Technology

FRAMEWORK FOR THE VALIDATION (EX- ANTE ASSESSMENT), MONITORING, MODIFICATION AND ACCREDITATION OF RECOGNISED DEGREES

Cross-border Higher Education The Spanish perspective 5th of November 2014

Reports and annual conferences over the last two years

introducing The Bologna Qualifications Framework

Degree Title Master of Science in Management: Specialization in Marketing. University Universitat Pompeu Fabra

PROPOSED MANDATE FOR THE GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP FOR EFFECTIVE DEVELOPMENT CO-OPERATION

Report of the Panel of the external review of NVAO September 2012

Policy Paper on Non-Formal Education: A framework for indicating and assuring quality

The following committees may have members in common or be disjoint, depending on the decision of the Center/Area faculty members.

Quality Assurance and the Bologna Process- European and German Perspectives. Stefan Bienefeld, German Academic Exchange Service

National Report regarding the Bologna Process implementation Lithuania

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

Qualifications Awarded by Two or More Degree-Awarding Bodies Characteristics

Decision on the Application of the Foundation for International Business Administration Accreditation (FIBAA) for Re-Accreditation Dated 12 May 2006

REPORT FROM THE INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON THE ROLE OF NATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORKS AND QUALITY ASSURANCE IN RECOGNITION

NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION STRATEGIC PLAN

Quality Uni Graz

UNIVERSITY OF THESSALY SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING

SELF 2014 EVALUATION REPORT

GUIDE TO DEVELOPING AND RUNNING JOINT PROGRAMMES AT BACHELOR AND MASTER S LEVEL. - A template

The Helsinki Communiqué

II. What is driving discussions on Quality (and Quality Assurance) in Europe

1 November BOLOGNA PROCESS TEMPLATE FOR NATIONAL REPORTS:

An introduction to EFMD accreditations: EQUIS and EPAS

Accreditation in Higher Education - an introduction -

UK Position Statement

Transcription:

1. The Spanish University System The Spanish University System maintains a dual organisation based on both public and private institutions. The figures of this organisation are as follows: 74 universities 52 public 22 private Total number of students enrolled: 1,506.000 students 1,378.000 in public institutions 128.000 in private institutions By areas of knowledge: Humanities: 9.42% Social and legal sciences: 48.67% Experimental sciences: 7.59% Health sciences: 7.75% Engineering, Architecture and other Technical studies: 26.57% The Spanish University System is strongly decentralised from the point of view of the competences, which have been mainly assumed by the regional governments (comunidades autónomas). The Ministry of Education and Science has competences concerning the legal framework of higher educaton and is also leading the adaptation of the structure of the traditional degrees to the Bologna Declaration model focusing on a three cycles structure: Bachelor (180-240 credits), Master (60 120 credits) and Doctorate oriented towards the completion of the Ph.D. The regional governments finance the public universities and play an essential role 2. The National Agency for Quality Assessment and Accreditation (ANECA) ANECA is the Spanish acronym for National Agency for Quality Assessment and Accreditation of Higher Education of Spain. ANECA is an independent body that acts as an advisory and technical body either at the request of the institutions of higher education and regional administrations with competences in higher education or according to the legal mandate of the Spanish Ministry of Education. ANECA develops the current programmes related to the evaluation of programmes, the official designation of the official quality label of doctoral programmes or the definition of the accreditation model for bachelor programmes for the new degrees derived from the adaptation of the Spanish university system to the Bologna Process structure. This model has to be approved by the Ministry of Education before its application to the institutions of higher education. ANECA is organised as a public foundation officially funded through the State Budget Act which is annually passed by the Spanish Parliament. Its directive bodies are twofold: the Board of Trustees chaired by the Ministry of Education which appoints the Director of ANECA and the Board of Directors steered by the Director and consisted in four other directors in charge of the different programmes conducted by ANECA. 1

The Director acts independently from the Board of Trustees, but (s)he has the commitment to submit a report including the activities accomplished throughout the year and the objectives for the next one. The staff of ANECA consists in around fifty employees with technical expertise and profiles hired according to private contracts who are not civil servants. Nevertheless, the Board of Directors as well as the evaluators and experts of the evaluation teams for the different programmes conducted by ANECA belong to the academic staff of the Spanish universities. Furthermore, ANECA has developed an Advisory Board (Consejo Asesor) made up from 16 members whose main function deals with the analysis of the actions, methodology and tools implemented by ANECA according to the international standards. The Advisory Board acts also as an external body in term of methodology and good practices in order to assure the independence of action and criteria accomplished by ANECA in the fulfilment of the programmes, activities and services included in its mission. The Advisory Board is made up from international experts on higher education governance, finance, quality assurance, accreditation, as well as stakeholders coming from several sectors of society. The international experts include representatives from Europe and Latin America. According to its Mission explicitly and publicly stated amongst the institutions of higher education, public administrations and stakeholders, ANECA wants to contribute to the quality improvement of the higher education system through its main technical programmes, that is, assessment, certification and accreditation of studies, programmes, teaching staff and institutions, either at the request of HE institutions or the requirement of both national or regional public administrations. ANECA s Strategic Plan has been designed as an essential tool to act both efficiently and coherently within its scope of competence concerning the higher education system. 3. The origins of ANECA ANECA was created by means of the Spanish University Act passed in 2001. This legal framework provides ANECA with the highest level of legal support within the national level concerning quality assurance and accreditation of higher education issues. Within this legal context, ANECA assumed from the very beginning the responsibilities and the work accomplished by the former Consejo de Coordinación Universitaria (University Co-ordination Council). It is an official body associated to the Spanish Ministry of Education where representatives from the Ministry of Education, Rector s Conference, Regional Governments, members of the Parliament and Senate meet. Since the mid nineties, this body launched the first and second Evaluation Plan for the Spanish Universities, which implied the first co-ordinated attempt to accomplish a thorough programme evaluation of the Spanish higher education institutions, according to the existing legal framework. Since mid-2002, after the constitution of ANECA, the former evaluation plan, as well as the rest of the initiatives conducted by any either ministerial or official departments accomplished to the date. 4. The mission and objectives of ANECA The strategic objectives of ANECA, according to the Strategic Plan of the agency are as follows: To implement the accreditation of programmes leading to official degrees (graduate and postgraduate) and offer a catalogue of programmes and services focussed on the mission 2

To become the main source of information on quality assurance issues of the higher education system at the national level and before society To generate trust and credibility amongst stakeholders To consolidate the organisation 4. The vision of ANECA The vision of the agency is to be recognised as a national and international reference for quality assurance and accreditation of the higher education system, generating credibility and trust due to its useful, transparent, efficient and agile procedures and methodologies. 5. The programmes leaded by ANECA in the framework of quality assurance ANECA contributes to the university quality improvement through the development of its different programmes oriented to the Spanish institutions of higher education by means of three main programmes: 1. Evaluation: Evaluation of higher education programmes leading to official degrees, under voluntary basis; evaluation of academic candidates to being hired by the universities as teaching staff, which is mandatory to be contracted by universities; evaluation of services provided by the universities: library service, plan for training the academic staff in teaching activities, evaluation of the international relations services of the universities, under voluntary basis. 2. Accreditation: Process of evaluation of studies leading to the obtainment of the official Degrees which are valid throughout Spain in order to fulfil the criteria and quality standards previously established for each type of degree. The methodology of the evaluation for accreditation is as follows: a. Self-assessment b. External Assessment c. Draft report on Accreditation d. Final report by the Ministry of Education and Science leading to the acceptance (and therefore maintenance of the programme), temporary cancellation of the programme until amendment of the problems found and the fulfilment of the enhancement measures, or the definite cancellation According to the model, the ultimate decision on accreditation is made by the Ministry of Education which is also the body in charge of assume the appeals t the decisions made by the agency. 3. Certification: It implies two main programmes oriented to the award of quality labels for doctoral programmes and university libraries. In the case of the Quality Label for doctoral programmes, the Ministry of Education gives ANECA first the evaluation of the applications from the universities sent to the call for proposals of the Ministry. Those programmes awarded, receive a financial grant from the Ministry and several benefits for mobility of students and academic staff. The following year, the programme has to pass an audit designed also by ANECA focused on the maintenance of the conditions previously evaluated by which the programme received the grant before receiving the grant. The third year the programme receives automatically the award. 3

6. Trend of ANECA in the near future The lessons probably are currently being learned since we are working in a extremely dynamic and changing environment concerning higher education at the national, European and global level. Therefore, ANECA needs very active mechanisms to response new challenges and request from both society and stakeholders. Concerning the trends for the future, ANECA has to cope with the likely trends of higher education in the national and international realms which could be summarised as follows: Development of the European Higher Education Area Globalisation and mobility of students, academic and research staff of the universities Improving transparency and accountability to society Flexibility of teaching plans Improving co-ordination amongst agencies Facing and assuming the changes introduced to the Spanish University Act (LOU) in the immediate future One of the first challenges for ANECA in the immediate future is the challenge derived from the increasing internationalisation of quality assurance and accreditation of higher education worldwide. The first and nearest focus must be obviously put on the European theatre and the building of the European Higher Education Area. Within this setting, ANECA is deeply involved in co-ordinating activities along with the main associations and network organisations working in the field: the European Association for Quality Assurance of Higher Education (ENQA) and the European Consortium for Accreditation (ECA). The director of ANECA is member of the executive boards of both organisations. Concerning the methodological issues and its application into the daily practice of the agencies and in the higher university system as a whole, ANECA is working within the framework supplied by ENQA through the Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance of Higher Education since its presentation in the Ministers Conference of Bergen in May 2005, as a reference document for the external review for Quality Assurance Agencies in the European context. Furthermore, and within the project represented by the European Consortium for Accreditation, ANECA assumes the Code of Good Practice developed by this organisation that has in the mutual recognition of the accreditation decisions its main objective for 2007. The European setting is not the only working landscape of ANECA. Latin America is also a main priority for ANECA concerning quality assurance and accreditation of higher education and the Ibero-American Network of Accreditation Agencies (RIACES) is the tool to enhance the co-operation with Latin American fellow-agencies towards the future mutual recognition scenario. ANECA acts as vice-president of this network and play an active role in the working group derived from it. This work includes also the making of a Glossary of quality assurance and accreditation of higher education to find a shared basis from the terminology viewpoint amongst the agencies from very different higher education systems of the two regions. Finally, as an important element, ANECA has requested to ENQA to be evaluated by an external committee according to the Standards and Guidelines during the first semester of 2007, as an example that ANECA assumes the responsibility to submit 4

itself to an evaluation by an external body before the national and international context. 5