IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA CONSENT DECREE I. INTRODUCTION

Similar documents
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Windmill Inns of America, d/b/a Windmill Inn of Ashland, Defendant.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CONSENT DECREE. Introduction

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CONSENT DECREE. Introduction

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Civil No (JRT/HB) INTRODUCTION

Case5:09-cv JF Document30 Filed03/04/10 Page1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FILED IN CLERKS OFFICE U.S. DISTRICT COURT ED. N.Y: * APR ic

Case l:ll-cv yk Document 15 Filed 07/19/12 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION INTRODUCTION

Case4:13-cv DMR Document1 Filed12/11/13 Page1 of 5

unlawful employment practices on the basis of disabilityand to provide appropriate relief to

Case 4:98-cv RWS Document 24 Filed 06/30/1999 Page 1 of 12

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS AND JEFF SCHMIDT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) CONSENT DECREE

Case 5:02-cv C Document 81 Filed 03/17/2003 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Plaintiff, : X. Nature of the Action. 1. This is an action for breach of a settlement agreement, retaliation

Case 3:10-cv JAP -DEA Document 1 Filed 08/11/10 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1

In the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Atlanta Division

Wendy Musell Stewart & Musell, LLP

Circuit Courtfor Hillsborough County (in her official capacity), Case No. 8:07 cv ("this

APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION

Harry E. Owens, IPMA-CP Adjunct Faculty, University of Georgia. U.S. Equal Opportunity Commission 1

Case 1:09-cv Document 1 Filed 12/10/09 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

J.V. Industrial Companies, Ltd. Dispute Resolution Process. Introduction

Case 1:10-cv KMM Document 20 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/20/2011 Page 1 of 9

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

individually and as an officer of Safety Cell, pursuant to Section 13(b) of the Federal Trade

Case 3:14-cv AC Document 10 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 43

ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED,

Case 1:08-cv WMS Document 2 Filed 12/23/2008 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

How To Get A Court Order To Stop A Man From Selling A Car To A Woman

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA HARRISONBURG DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, ) ) )

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

CONSENT OF DEFENDANT PAUL W. JENNINGS

Case 1:16-cv DLC Document 12 Filed 06/17/16 Page 11 of of 88

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORIGIA-~~T ~:J,-~T,>cURT SAVANNAH DIVISION j Ga. NATURE OF THE ACTION

EEOC and CRT share authority for the enforcement of Title VII with respect to state and local governmental employers.

ADMINISTRATIVE INSTRUCTION

Case4:13-cv SBA Document40 Filed10/14/14 Page1 of 11

4:14-cv PMD Date Filed 06/10/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10

A. Arizona School Risk Retention Trust ("Trust").

Case 1:15-cv KMW Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/28/2016 Page 1 of 8 UNTIED STATE DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 6:13 cv Document 1 Filed 10/03/13 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

Plaintiff Carol Parker ( Plaintiff ), residing at 32 Coleman Way, Jackson, NJ 08527, by her undersigned counsel, alleges the following upon personal

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF AGREED CONSENT DECREE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This Settlement Agreement (hereafter Agreement ) is entered into by

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION COMPLAINT. Plaintiff United States of America ( United States"), alleges:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 0:15-cv WJZ Document 6-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2015 Page 1 of 21

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

The Judges of the Fulton Superior Court hereby create a "Business Case Division" (hereinafter referred to as the "Division").

Case 1:14-cv ERK-JMA Document 1-1 Filed 02/27/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 6 CIVIL COVER SHEET (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.

/J.'llf-cv-2-olo/- IZ1

INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT AGREEMENT

Case 1:11-cv SKG Document 5 Filed 07/06/11 Page 1 of 36

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 206 Filed 10/15/15 Page 1 of 10 USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. Plaintiff DIVISION "D" JUDGE McNAMARA v.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION CONSENT DECREE. WHEREAS: Plaintiff, the United States of America, has

Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed 05/24/10 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CASE NO. 1:12-CV-1179

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, TAMPA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

COpyFORCERTIFICATION

BOOKING AGENT AGREEMENT AMERICAN FEDERATION OF MUSICIANS

REGULATORY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. THIS REGULATORY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (the Regulatory Settlement

I Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 106 cd 503

NORTH CAROLINA WESLEYAN COLLEGE POLICY ON GENDER DISCRIMINATION AND SEXUAL HARASSMENT

ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

CASE 0:99-md PAM Document 490 Filed 06/27/05 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case 2:13-cv ES-JAD Document Filed 12/09/15 Page 1 of 18 PageID: 4861 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

No. Plaintiff Kelvin Bledsoe ( Plaintiff ), by his undersigned counsel, brings claims

Case 3:06-cv MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Administrative Bulletin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE DIRECTIVE /6/04 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM

The Consent Decree - A Civil Decision

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. Julie Brill Maureen K. Ohlhausen Joshua D. Wright Terrell McSweeny

Case: 1:13-cv SSB-SKB Doc #: 9 Filed: 03/11/14 Page: 1 of 5 PAGEID #: 31

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAI`I ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Transcription:

WILLIAM TAMAYO, REGIONAL ATTORNEY OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION SAN FRANCISCO DISTRICT OFFICE 0 THE EMBARCADERO, SUITE 00 SAN FRANCISCO, CA -0 JOHN STANLEY, SUPERVISORY TRIAL ATTORNEY CARMEN FLORES, SENIOR TRIAL ATTORNEY OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 0 FIRST AVENUE, SUITE 00 SEATTLE, WA TEL: () 0- ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA DENISE J. POOLE Plaintiff and Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. NEA-ALASKA, INC., THOMAS HARVEY and NATIONAL EDUCATON ASSOCIATION, Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. CV-0-00 RRB CONSENT DECREE I. INTRODUCTION CONSENT DECREE - Page 1 of 0 First Avenue, Suite 00 Seattle, Washington -1 Telephone: () 0- Facsimile: () 0- TDD: () 0-

1. This action originated when Denise J. Poole filed a charge of discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC or Commission"). Ms. Poole alleged that NEA-Alaska, Inc. ( NEA-AK or Defendant ) discriminated against her and a class of similarly situated women based on their gender in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of, as amended ( Title VII ), U.S.C. 00e et seq.. The EEOC issued a letter of determination with a finding of reasonable cause to believe that NEA-AK violated Title VII on behalf of Ms. Poole and a class of similarly situated women. Thereafter, EEOC attempted to conciliate the charge and conciliation was unsuccessful.. The Commission filed its Complaint on September, 0, in the United States District Court for the District of Alaska. The Complaint alleges that NEA-AK discriminated against Ms. Poole and class members, Ellen Cruse, Kimila Cherry and Lyn Jackson based on their gender in violation of Title VII.. The parties want to conclude fully and finally all claims arising out of the EEOC s Complaint and Ms. Poole s charge of discrimination filed with EEOC. The EEOC and NEA-AK enter into this Consent Decree to further the objectives of equal employment opportunity as set forth in Title VII. II. NON-ADMISSION OF LIABILITY AND NON-DETERMINATION BY THE COURT. This Consent Decree is not an adjudication or finding on the merits of this case and shall not be construed as an admission by NEA-AK of a violation of Title VII. III. SETTLEMENT SCOPE. This Consent Decree is the final and complete resolution of all allegations of unlawful employment practices contained in Ms. Poole s discrimination charge, in the EEOC's CONSENT DECREE - Page of 0 First Avenue, Suite 00 Seattle, Washington -1 Telephone: () 0- Facsimile: () 0- TDD: () 0-

administrative determination, and in the Complaint filed herein, including all claims by the parties for attorney fees and costs. IV. MONETARY RELIEF. In settlement of this lawsuit, NEA-AK agrees to pay directly to Ms. Poole $0,000, Ms. Cruse $0,000 ($,000 of which constitutes lost wages), Ms. Cherry $,000 and Ms. Jackson $,000 within seven () days of the date of entry of this consent decree. V. INJUNCTIVE AND OTHER RELIEF A. General Provisions. NEA-AK, its officers, agents, managers, assistant managers and other supervisors and all human resource professionals who provide advice and assistance to the foregoing individuals are enjoined from engaging in practices which unlawfully discriminate against applicants and/or employees on the basis of disability or in retaliation for engaging in protected activity. In recognition of its obligations under Title VII, NEA-AK shall institute the policies and practices set forth below. B. Anti-Discrimination Policies and Procedures. Defendant shall carry out anti-discrimination policies, procedures and training for management personnel, supervisors and employees.. NEA-AK shall continue in effect the equal employment opportunity ( EEO ) policy now in effect that prohibits discrimination against applicants and/or employees with respect to any term, condition or privilege of employment, and addresses NEA-AK s obligation to provide a work environment free from discrimination and retaliation for its employees. Not later than sixty (0) days after entry of this Consent Decree, NEA-AK shall certify that it has CONSENT DECREE - Page of 0 First Avenue, Suite 00 Seattle, Washington -1 Telephone: () 0- Facsimile: () 0- TDD: () 0-

distributed a written copy of its EEO policy to all its employees, both management and nonmanagement. C. Equal Employment Opportunity Training. NEA-AK shall provide an annual, four-hour EEO training seminar to all of its managers, supervisors, and employees. This anti-discrimination training shall include, at a minimum, a discussion of federal law prohibiting employment discrimination and retaliation, including Title VII and a review of NEA-AK s EEO policies. The training shall be aimed at helping attendees understand how to define and identify employment discrimination, and provide information as to avenues of addressing suspected employment discrimination. Training materials must be submitted to the EEOC in reasonable time ahead of the training session for review and approval prior to their use. The EEOC shall not, however, unreasonably withhold approval.. Not later than December 1, 0, NEA-AK shall provide the EEO training noted in Paragraph to all of its managers and supervisors, including those responsible for hiring and discharge decisions.. Not later than December 1, 0, NEA-AK shall provide the EEO training noted in Paragraph to those non-management or supervisory employees employed at the time the EEO training seminar is scheduled. Thereafter, NEA-AK shall provide an annual EEO training seminar(s) for managers, supervisors and employees during the duration of the Consent Decree.. For the duration of this Consent Decree, NEA-AK shall notify the EEOC of the completion of the training seminars and shall specify the names and job titles of the managers, supervisors and employees who participated in and completed the training. This information shall be provided as part of the annual report NEA-AK submits to the EEOC. CONSENT DECREE - Page of 0 First Avenue, Suite 00 Seattle, Washington -1 Telephone: () 0- Facsimile: () 0- TDD: () 0-

D. Non-Disclosure of Information. NEA-AK shall not disclose any information or make reference to any charge of discrimination or this lawsuit in responding to requests for information about Ms. Poole, Ms. Cruse, Ms. Cherry or Ms. Jackson. E. Policies Designed to Promote Accountability. NEA-AK agrees that it shall impose discipline, up to and including termination of employment, upon any supervisor or manager who discriminates against any applicant and/or employee on the basis of disability, or who retaliates against any person who complains about or participates in any investigation or proceeding concerning any allegation of discrimination. NEA-AK shall communicate this policy to all of its managers and supervisors.. NEA-AK agrees that it shall continue to advise all managers and supervisors of their duty to ensure compliance with anti-discrimination laws and the Company s EEO policy. In conducting performance reviews, the Company shall hold managers and supervisors accountable for EEO enforcement and compliance. F. Reporting. NEA-AK shall agree to report to the EEOC for a period of four () years. The reports shall be in writing and submitted on an annual basis during the four year reporting period. The reporting period will run from the date of the entry of this Consent Decree by the United States District Court for the District of Alaska.. These annual reports shall contain the following information and attachments: a. Certification that NEA-AK has: 1. Continued to maintain its written EEO policies and procedures and annually distributed copies of its EEO policy to all current and newly hired employees and as described in Paragraph ; CONSENT DECREE - Page of 0 First Avenue, Suite 00 Seattle, Washington -1 Telephone: () 0- Facsimile: () 0- TDD: () 0-

. Complied with the training provisions enumerated in this Consent Decree, as provided in Paragraphs -;. Continued to promote policies and procedures to promote EEO accountability by managers and supervisors, as required by Paragraph -.. Complied with all other provisions of this Consent Decree. b. Copies of the following documents shall be included with each annual report submitted to the Seattle office of the EEOC: 1. A copy of the Company s EEO policy and procedures;. A summary of internal formal or informal discrimination complaints on the basis of disability or retaliation, if any, filed by employees and the resolution of each such complaint;. A sign-in sheet or list of the NEA-AK names and job titles of the managers, supervisors and employees who completed EEO training and the dates the training was conducted during the previous reporting period.. If applicable, NEA-AK shall submit a statement with its report to the EEOC specifying the areas of noncompliance, the reason for the noncompliance, and the steps that shall be taken to bring NEA-AK into compliance. G. Posting. NEA-AK shall post a Notice to All Employees. This Notice is attached as Exhibit 1 to this Consent Decree. The Notice shall be posted on a centrally located bulletin board at all NEA-AK facilities for the duration of the Consent Decree. VI. ENFORCEMENT. If the EEOC determines that NEA-AK has not complied with the terms of this Consent Decree, the EEOC shall provide written notification of the alleged breach to NEA-AK. CONSENT DECREE - Page of 0 First Avenue, Suite 00 Seattle, Washington -1 Telephone: () 0- Facsimile: () 0- TDD: () 0-

The EEOC shall not petition the Court for enforcement of this Consent Decree for at least twenty () days after providing written notification of the alleged breach. The -day period following the written notice shall be used by the EEOC and NEA-AK for good faith efforts to resolve the dispute. VII. RETENTION OF JURISDICTION. The United States District Court for the District of Alaska shall retain jurisdiction over this matter for the duration of this Consent Decree. VIII. DURATION AND TERMINATION. This Consent Decree shall be in effect for four () years from the date of entry of the Decree. If the EEOC petitions the Court for breach of this Consent Decree, and the Court finds NEA-AK to be in violation of the terms of the Consent Decree, the Court may extend the duration of this Consent Decree. Dated this rd day of September 0. WILLIAM TAMAYO Regional Attorney JOHN STANLEY Supervisory Trial Attorney CARMEN FLORES Senior Trial Attorney BY: /s/ Carmen Flores OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Seattle Field Office 0 First Avenue, Suite 00 Seattle, Washington Telephone () 0- carmen.flores@eeoc.gov JAMES L. LEE Deputy General Counsel GWENDOLYN Y. REAMS Associate General Counsel Office of the General Counsel 1 M Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 0 CONSENT DECREE - Page of 0 First Avenue, Suite 00 Seattle, Washington -1 Telephone: () 0- Facsimile: () 0- TDD: () 0-

Attorneys for Plaintiff BY: /s/ Leslie Longenbaugh Leslie Longenbaugh Logenbaugh Law Firm, LLC Main Street Juneau, Alaska 01 Phone: 0--0 Fax: 0--0 lesliel@longenbaughlawfirm.com Attorneys for Defendants NEA-AK and Thomas Harvey CONSENT DECREE - Page of 0 First Avenue, Suite 00 Seattle, Washington -1 Telephone: () 0- Facsimile: () 0- TDD: () 0-

NOTICE TO EMPLOYEES The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the National Education Association-Alaska have agreed to a Consent Decree that has been entered pursuant to an Order of the Court. This notice has been posted pursuant to the Order entered in the EEOC & Poole v. National Education Association-Alaska, National Education Association and Harvey in the U.S. District Court of Alaska, Cause No. CV-0-00(RRB). The Consent Decree is in no way an admission of wrongdoing. Nor is it an adjudication or finding on the merits of the case. NEA-AK disputes all claims of the plaintiffs in this lawsuit; they have entered into the Consent Decree in the interest of limiting the expense of litigation. Federal law and this Consent Decree prohibit discrimination or retaliation against any employee. Federal law also prohibits retaliation against any employee by an employer because the individual complains of discrimination, cooperates with any Employer or Government Investigation of a charge of discrimination, participates as a witness or potential witness in any investigation or legal proceeding, or otherwise exercises his or her rights under the law. Any employee who is found to have retaliated against any other employee because such employee participated in this lawsuit will be subject to substantial discipline up to and including immediate discharge. Should you have any complaints of discrimination, including harassment or retaliation, you should refer to your workplace anti-discrimination policy for reporting procedures. Employees also have the right to bring complaints of discrimination or harassment to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission or local state Human Rights Commission in their respective area. EXHIBIT 1

WILLIAM TAMAYO, REGIONAL ATTORNEY OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION SAN FRANCISCO DISTRICT OFFICE 0 THE EMBARCADERO, SUITE 00 SAN FRANCISCO, CA -0 JOHN STANLEY, SUPERVISORY TRIAL ATTORNEY CARMEN FLORES, SENIOR TRIAL ATTORNEY OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 0 FIRST AVENUE, SUITE 00 SEATTLE, WA TEL: () 0- ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION And DENISE J. POOLE, Plaintiff, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. NEA-AKASKA, INC., THOMAS HARVEY, and NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. CV-0-00 RRB [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL ORDER APPROVING CONSENT DECREE AND DISMISSING ACTION The Court having considered the foregoing stipulated agreement of the parties, HEREBY EEOC and Poole v. NEA-Alaska, Inc., et al [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL Page 1 of 0 First Avenue, Suite 00 Seattle, Washington -1 Telephone: () 0- Facsimile: () 0- TDD: () 0-

ORDERS THAT the foregoing consent decree is approved as the final decree of this Court in full settlement of this action. This lawsuit is hereby dismissed with prejudice and without cost or attorneys fees to any party. The Court retains jurisdiction of this matter solely for purposes of enforcing the consent decree approved herein. DATED this day of, 0. Presented by: UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE /s/ Carmen Flores EEOC Trial Attorney EEOC and Poole v. NEA-Alaska, Inc., et al [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL Page of 0 First Avenue, Suite 00 Seattle, Washington -1 Telephone: () 0- Facsimile: () 0- TDD: () 0-