TANF: Troubling Trends in Kansas

Similar documents
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA S TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES (TANF) PROGRAM

History of TANF Refinancing in Minnesota

The 60-Month Time Limit on TANF Assistance

SECOND CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT BRIEF SENATE SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 2281

SECTION I: Current Michigan Policies on Postsecondary Education for Low-income Parents Receiving Public Assistance

TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE for NEEDY FAMILIES a guide to Virginia s cash assistance program

The Temporary Assistance for Needy Families

Oregon. Assisting People to Become Independent, Healthy and Safe. John A. Kitzhaber, MD, Governor

Guide to Welfare in Maryland

TANF cuts: Is Arizona shortsighted in its dwindling support for poor families?

Overview of the TANF Web Reporting Tool

How Proposed Cuts in Vital Services Will Hurt New Jersey

Access and Barriers to Post-Secondary Education Under Michigan's Welfare to Work Policies

Children s Health Insurance Timeline

Attachment A General Instructions:

NORTH CAROLINA S TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE STATE PLAN P.L NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION OF SOCIAL SERVICES

Figure 24 Georgia s Children a Major Focus of Human Services. $20 M Georgia Vocational Rehab Agency $1.5 M Office of Residential Child Care

A NEW WELFARE-TO-WORK APPROACH FOR TEXAS. Contact: Celia Hagert, or Don Baylor,

Presented to: 2007 Kansas Legislature. February 1, 2007

Department of Economic Security Employment and Rehabilitation Services

GUIDANCE. January U.S. Department of Education. Office of Elementary and Secondary Education

Department of Economic Security A.R.S Employment and Rehabilitation Services

Community Eligibility Provision: Department of Education Title I Guidance

Maine's Parents as Scholars Program

State EITC For California Family Workships

JUST THE FACTS A Monthly Public Assistance Update from the Illinois Department of Human Services

Health Reform and the AAP: What the New Law Means for Children and Pediatricians

The National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) recognizes the challenges facing our

JUST THE FACTS A Monthly Public Assistance Update from the Illinois Department of Human Services

COMMON PATHWAYS TO ELIGIBILITY

How To Get A Medicaid Card

DPW s Healthy Pennsylvania Plan and the Pennsylvania Budget

WHAT S IN THE PROPOSED FY 2016 BUDGET FOR HEALTH CARE?

Child Health Assurance Program (CHAP)

Summary of the Major Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act

OPPORTUNITIES UNDER THE TANF EMERGENCY FUND CREATED BY THE FEDERAL RECOVERY ACT By Liz Schott

OVERVIEW OF MICHIGAN S WELFARE SYSTEM & WORK FIRST

Issue Brief. The Quiet Revolution in Health Care Coverage for Illinois Children NOVEMBER 2004 LAWRENCE B. JOSEPH

SUBSTANCE ABUSE SCREENING/TESTING S.B. 275 & H.B. 4118: SUMMARY AS ENROLLED

West Virginia Children and Families Funding Study

CCDBG: What s in the law?

GENERAL EXCHANGE TARIFF PSCK NO. 3. CINCINNATI BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY LLC Section 53 3rd Revised Page 1 Cancels 2nd Revised Page 1 LIFELINE

Florida s Families and Children Below the Federal Poverty Level

ELIGIBILITY QUESTIONS

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES

Testimony of Howard H. Hendrick Director, Oklahoma Deparment of Human Services

STATE OF COLORADO FY BUDGET REQUEST CYCLE: DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES

Presentation to the House Committee on Human Services: HHSC Overview

Déjà Vu: Michigan Struggles to Fund Medicaid Program

; ; CCR (2) DRA 2005 public law

GUIDE TO WELFARE IN MARYLAND

Department of Economic Security Division of Benefits and Medical Eligibility

DRUG TESTING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN:

WYOMING MEDICAID ELIGIBILITY OVERVIEW. State of Wyoming Department of Health

The Best of Times for the State, But Still the Worst of Times for State's Poor

Federal Food Assistance Programs: Better Coordination Will Help Households and Save Government Dollars

Department of Economic Security Employment & Rehabilitation Services

SINGLE MOTHERS SINCE 2000: FALLING FARTHER DOWN 1

What s Happening In Wisconsin In Early Childhood Education and Care?

A New Approach to Poverty

Virginia s Health Insurance Programs for Children and Pregnant Women An Overview

ELE Strategies to Increase Medicaid and SCHIP enrollment

2009 Franklin County Profile Statistical and Demographic Data. German Village, Columbus, Ohio

Work Requirements, ABAWDs & Time Limits... 1 Pilot Participants... 2 Screening Work Registrants... 3 Allowable Activities... 4 Other...

Georgia Can Make Better Use of Federal Assistance for Workforce Development

NATIONAL BABY FACTS. Infants, Toddlers, and Their Families in the United States THE BASICS ABOUT INFANTS AND TODDLERS

Everyone can be great, Because Everyone can serve. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

A HAND UP How State Earned Income Tax Credits Help Working Families Escape Poverty in Summary. By Joseph Llobrera and Bob Zahradnik

Supplemental Security Income

By Lori Connors-Tadros, Torey Silloway, Jennifer Mayman, and Melissa Dahlin. The Finance Project

FY 10/11 ARIZONA BUDGET PROPOSALS: HOW VULNERABLE CHILDREN AND FAMILIES FARE March 10, 2010

How do benefit adjustments for government transfer programs compare with their participants inflation experiences?

Increasing Financial Stability Using Public Benefits to Combat Homelessness

Colorado Works Handbook

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Brief Overview of the Impact on Children & Youth in Governor Cuomo's Executive Budget FY

State Notes TOPICS OF LEGISLATIVE INTEREST Spring 2016

DHS BUDGET REQUEST FOR FY ($ Amounts in Thousands)

How Health Reform Will Help Children with Mental Health Needs

Assessing the New Federalism

The dynamics of disconnection for low-income mothers

Guide to Health and Social Services

government benefits planning: what claimants need to know

Rhode Island KIDS COUNT Presents: Newport Data in Your Backyard ~~~

Miami County. County Commissioners: Jack Evans John O Brien Ron Widener. County Department of Job and Family Services Child Support Enforcement Agency

An Overview of Medicaid in North Carolina *

REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE ON SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES UNDER THE CalWORKs PROGRAM

Ottawa County. County Commissioners: Steve Arndt James Sass Mark Stahl

Senate Bill No. 2 CHAPTER 673

The GPO predominantly penalizes women educators in California, while the WEP penalizes many individuals who switch careers into public service.

States Can Adopt or Expand Earned Income Tax Credits to Build a Stronger Future Economy By Erica Williams

Welfare reform was passed

Mandatory Spending Since 1962

Health Care Reform Frequently Asked Questions

Bulletin. Policy Changes to Education and Training Activities in the Minnesota Family Investment Program (MFIP) PURPOSE CONTACT SIGNED

Community, Early Childhood, and Adult Education Programs

Health Care Reform Frequently Asked Questions

Rider Comparison Packet General Appropriations Bill

Education in Georgia: Growing Expectations, Shrinking State Investment

Medicaid 101: The SoonerCare Safety Net By Kate Richey, Policy Analyst

Transcription:

TANF: Troubling Trends in Kansas

With 1 in 5 Kansas children living in poverty, more families are turning to social safety-net programs to help them meet their basic needs. Important programs, such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), free and reduced price lunches and Medicaid, are experiencing record enrollments. However, a fundamental anti-poverty program, Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF), is experiencing the opposite trend decreasing caseloads that do not reflect the increase in poverty across Kansas. Childhood Poverty in Kansas 21.16 percent of Kansas kids live in poverty. Childhood poverty has increased 22 percent in the past five years. 49,000 Kansas children live in deep poverty (families earning less than 50 percent of the poverty level) an increase of 11,000 children since 2008. 98 Kansas counties have an increasing trend of children receiving food assistance. TANF in Kansas Between fiscal years 2012 and 2013, the number of children receiving TANF assistance decreased by 28 percent. On average, over the past five years the number of Kansas children receiving TANF assistance has decreased by 1,570 each year. 102 Kansas counties have a stagnant or decreasing trend of children receiving TANF assistance. History and Origin Temporary Assistance for Needy Families is the program created by welfare reform in 1996. TANF replaced a program called Assistance for Dependent Children (AFDC), which was created in 1935 and commonly referred to as welfare. With the elimination of AFDC and the creation of TANF, assistance to low-income families shifted significantly by providing states with greater flexibility in program design and placing time limits for receiving assistance. Financing The federal government provides funding to states for TANF through block grants. Each state receives a block grant and then enters into an agreement with the federal government about how to administer its TANF program. Kansas TANF block grant is $101.9 million each year, and the program is housed in the Department of Children and Families. To receive the federal dollars, the state provides matching maintenance of effort funds in the amount of $62 million. The governor s proposed 2015 budget estimated that Kansas would retain more than $40 million of TANF dollars in reserves.

Goals of TANF As outlined by the Administration for Children and Families within the Department of Health and Human Services, there are four goals states must strive for when deciding how to use their TANF dollars: 1. Provide assistance to needy families so that children can be cared for in their own homes 2. Reduce the dependency of needy parents by promoting job preparation, work and marriage 3. Prevent and reduce the incidence of out-ofwedlock pregnancies 4. Encourage the formation and maintenance of two-parent families What TANF Provides to Families Cash assistance is the program most identified with TANF and is most similar to what AFDC provided to families before welfare reform in 1996. Assistance amounts vary based on the county in which recipients live. For example, a family of three living in a highcost, high-population county is eligible to receive $429 per month, whereas a family of three in a rural county is eligible to receive $386 per month. In addition to cash assistance, Kansas uses TANF dollars (both federal dollars and state matching dollars) to fund other programs and services aimed at achieving the program goals outlined above. Kansas TANF dollars are used to support these programs: Family Preservation Four Year-Old At Risk Program Kansas Early Head Start State Earned Income Tax Credit Child Care Assistance Communities In Schools Program Jobs for America s Graduates Kansas Program Kansas Reading Roadmap Assistance for Domestic Violence Survivors Teen Pregnancy Prevention and Education Fatherhood and Healthy Families Emergency Assistance Family Size MONTHLY CASH ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS Rural County High Cost Rural County High Population Counties High Cost High Population Counties 1 $224 $229 $241 $267 2 $309 $314 $326 $352 3 $386 $391 $403 $429 4 $454 $459 $471 $497 5+ Add $61 for each additional person TANF Eligibility Families must live in extreme poverty to receive cash assistance through TANF. The maximum income a family can earn and still qualify for cash assistance is 32 percent of the poverty level that s just $6,332.80 a year or $527.73 a month. Recipients of cash assistance have a lifetime eligibility limit of 48 months regardless of whether they have another child, face an economic downturn or lose their jobs. The federal government sets the maximum lifetime limit at 60 months, but some states, including Kansas, implement shorter lifetime limits. Families earning more than 32 percent of the poverty level are not eligible for cash assistance, but may be eligible for other programs paid for with TANF dollars. For example, TANF-supported Early Head Start serves families earning up to 130 percent of poverty.

TANF Trends in Kansas There has been a sharp decline in the number of children in families receiving cash assistance through the TANF program in Kansas. In fiscal year 2007 prior to the great recession 26,633 Kansas children were in families that received TANF assistance, but in fiscal year 2013 that number dropped to 15,419. Although the rate of childhood poverty has continued to climb and other assistance programs, such as food assistance, Medicaid (KanCare) and free and reduced price lunch, have seen record enrollments, an opposite enrollment trend has happened with TANF. A key difference between TANF and other assistance programs is that TANF is a block grant, meaning that Kansas receives one lump sum from the federal government and has significant control of how the funds are used. This is different from programs like Medicaid and food assistance, where program eligibility and rules are largely determined by the federal government and the state, with significant financial support from the federal government, must provide care to all Kansans who meet eligibility criteria and seek assistance. To explore the discrepancy between declining TANF enrollment and the rise in the poverty rate, it s important to understand the policy changes made to TANF eligibility since fiscal year 2005 as outlined in the TANF Caseload Reduction Report from the Kansas Department of Children and Families. Of the 23 policy changes, six resulted in increased caseloads, 10 resulted in decreased caseloads and seven had no impact on caseload numbers. Children enrolled in Medicaid, SNAP and TANF (average monthly enrollment) 250000 Medicaid 234000 218000 202000 186000 30000 TANF 170000 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 26000 22000 160000 144000 SNAP 18000 14000 10000 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 128000 112000 96000 80000 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

TANF Policy Changes That Led to Decreased Caseloads Work Readiness Screening Implemented: October 2006 Change: Required applicants to undergo a work readiness screening as part of the eligibility criteria for receiving TANF cash assistance. 403 cases. Child Under One Work Exemption Revision 1 Implemented: July 2007 Change: Shortened the work exemption time period from 12 months to six months, meaning that TANF recipients with children under 6 months old were exempt from the work requirement, but those recipients with children older than 6 months were not exempt. 118.6 cases. Hardship Criteria Revision Implemented: October 2008 Change: Eliminated hardship eligibility for select TANF recipients after they met their lifetime limits for assistance. Hardship eligibility is used at the state s discretion to provide recipients with assistance after their lifetime limits have been met. 373.9 cases. Application Policies Implemented: November 2011 Modified: July 2013 Change: Required TANF recipients to complete 20 job contacts before their eligibility determination and 20 job contacts per week before meeting with a case manager to develop a self-sufficiency plan. In July 2013, the policy was modified to eliminate the job contacts requirement and to require applicants to register with the state s public workforce system and complete a work skills assessment. Impact: The November 2011 policy change resulted in a 10 percent increase in applicant denials while the July 2013 policy change decreased denials by 5 percent. Combined, the two policies resulted in an average monthly reduction of 2,551.7 cases. Tiered Sanctions for Child Support and Work Requirements Implemented: November 2011 Change: Imposed progressively longer mandatory disqualification periods for recurring instances of non-cooperation. Following the first instance of non-cooperation TANF recipients are disqualified from receiving assistance for three months. A second non-cooperation results in a six-month disqualification, a third instance of non-cooperation results in 12 months of disqualification and the fourth instance of non-cooperation results in a disqualification for 10 years. Before this policy change, TANF recipients who failed to comply with work or child support requirements had their cash assistance cut off and were required to meet compliance before their cash assistance was reinstated. Impact: The rate of sanctions did not change significantly but the newly imposed disqualification periods following a sanction of non-cooperation resulted in an average monthly caseload decrease of 229.5 cases.

48-Month Time Limit Implemented: November 2012 Change: Reduced the total time a person may receive cash assistance from 60 months to 48 months. The federal government sets 60 months as the lifetime limit for assistance and states have the option to set a shorter lifetime limit. 950 cases. Separating TANF Application from Medicaid Application Implemented: November 2011 Change: Applications for TANF and Medicaid were separated into two forms. In Kansas, all families receiving TANF are eligible for Medicaid and in the past could apply for both programs with one form. Work Appointment Policy Implemented: July 2013 Change: Allowed appointment notices sent to recipients to be considered fair notice of the appointment and the consequence of missing an appointment. Before this policy change, TANF recipients could be sanctioned for missing an appointment with their caseworkers to discuss work opportunities only if a case manager could document that the recipient knew about the appointment and understood the consequences of missing the appointment. Because families facing deep poverty are often more transient than higherincome families, the elimination of the need to prove they are aware of appointments that have been scheduled led to a significant increase in the proportion of cases receiving a work sanction. Impact: Average monthly decrease of 28.3 cases. 1,481.6 cases. Offering a Diversion Program Implemented: December 2011 Change: Some TANF recipients were offered a one-time payment of $1,000 in exchange for losing eligibility for cash assistance for 12 months and an overall lifetime limit of 42 months for cash assistance. 1.7 cases. Child Under One Work Exemption Revision 2 Implemented: May 2013 Change: Required new mothers to return to work two months after having a child. Before this policy change new mothers with children under 6 months old were exempt from the work requirements. Impact: Average monthly decrease of 39.5 cases.

Conclusion At a time when more Kansas families are struggling to make ends meet and provide for their children, the state is responding with more restrictive eligibility rules to access cash assistance through TANF. These policy changes are not legislative changes but rather administrative changes made through the Department for Children and Families. Block grants provide state administrations with significant flexibility to design and implement programs. Unfortunately, in recent years the flexibility awarded to the state through the TANF block grant has resulted in policies that led to an overall decrease in the number of families and children receiving assistance. The governor s proposed 2015 budget summarized this point by stating that estimated TANF caseloads for FY 2015 reflect reductions to adjust for policy changes implemented in the fall of 2011, including benefit penalties for individuals who choose not to cooperate in work programs and child support enforcement, a co-habitation inclusion in eligibility determination and a reduction in lifetime benefits from 60 months to 48 months. Just as the state has made policy decisions that led to decreased TANF enrollment, the state has the option, through the flexibility of the block grant, to reverse these policies or make additional changes to better meet the needs of Kansas families. Policy Recommendations: Reinstitute a 60-month lifetime limit for cash assistance. This is the maximum time limit allowed by federal policy and the time limit used by Kansas until the November 2012 policy change. The reduction of the lifetime limit to 48 months resulted in one of the largest decreases in the average monthly caseload and reinstituting a 60-month time limit will provide families most in need with necessary additional assistance. Combine TANF and medical assistance applications. All TANF cash assistance recipients are eligible for Medicaid, making it unnecessarily burdensome to complete separate applications. The separation of the Medicaid and TANF applications resulted in an average monthly decrease of nearly 1,500 cases, indicating that recombining the applications will ensure that more Kansas families in need receive both Medicaid and cash assistance. Adjust eligibility to reflect changes in the poverty level. The income eligibility for TANF cash assistance has remained stagnant since its inception. In 1997, following the enactment of welfare reform the income eligibility limit equated to 47.5 percent of the federal poverty level. Today, that same income amount equates to 32 percent of the poverty level. Kansas should maintain the same guidelines for eligibility from yearto-year rather than a set income amount, thereby allowing Kansas families who make modest income gains but still remain in deep poverty to continue receiving critical cash assistance as they work toward self-sufficiency.

720 SW Jackson, Suite 201 Topeka, KS 66603 785-232-0550 kac.org