9644/16 KT/lv 1 DGE 1C

Similar documents
Council of the European Union Brussels, 10 November 2015 (OR. en)

13 th Council of Europe Conference of Ministers responsible for Sport. 18 September 2014

16207/14 AD/cs 1 DGG 2B

Presidency conclusions on establishing a strategy to combat the manipulation of sport results

10721/16 GSC/lt 1 DGB 2B

JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION

Deliverable 3 Supervision of sports agents and transfers of players, notably young players. Expert Group "Good Governance

Realising the European Higher Education Area

The European Lotteries

The European Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning (EQF)

16094/14 MM/mj 1 DG E - 1C

Ensuring protection European Union Guidelines on Human Rights Defenders

COMMISSION DECISION. of establishing the REFIT Platform

PUBLIC COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 8 July /05 LIMITE CRIMORG 67 ENFOPOL 88

Deliverable 1. Input on the EU's role in fighting match-fixing. Expert Group "Good Governance. EU Work Plan for Sport

RECOMMENDATIONS. COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION of 7 March 2014 on strengthening the principle of equal pay between men and women through transparency

Council of the European Union Brussels, 27 February 2015 (OR. en) Permanent Representatives Committee (Part 2)/Council

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING. Between THE UNION DES ASSOCIATIONS EUROPEENNES DE FOOTBALL (HEREAFTER UEFA) And

Delegations will find attached a set of Presidency drafting suggestions concerning Articles 1-3 of the above proposal, as well as the Recitals.

The Committee is invited to forward the draft Conclusions to the Council (EPSCO) for adoption at its session on 7 December 2015.

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 8 May /08 EDUC 144 SOC 276 CULT 67 COMPET 178 RECH 173. NOTE from: Presidency

Draft conclusions of the Council and of the Member States on the civil and commercial justice systems of the Member States

Committee of Ministers - The promotion of Internet and online media services a...

Funding priorities for 2013 Annual Work Plan European Union Programme for Employment and Social Solidarity PROGRESS

Arrangement for Cooperation. between. the Union of European Football Associations. and. the European Commission

(Acts whose publication is obligatory) DECISION No 1855/2006/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. of 12 December 2006

Declaration on the 20th Anniversary of the Barents Euro-Arctic Cooperation. (Kirkenes, Norway, 3 4 June 2013)

ESSA Q INTEGRITY REPORT

Delegations will find attached the text of the above conclusions as adopted at the Education, Youth and Culture Council on 21 November 2008.

Global Leaders' Meeting on Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment: A Commitment to Action 27 September 2015, New York

Nations publication, Sales No. E.96.IV.8), chap. I, resolution 1, annex I. 3 Ibid., annex II.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities DG COMMUNITY PROGRAMME FOR EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL SOLIDARITY (PROGRESS)

Northern Dimension Policy Framework Document (effective as 1 January 2007)

EBA FINAL draft Regulatory Technical Standards

Memorandum of Understanding on Labour Cooperation

COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION. of on strengthening the principle of equal pay between men and women through transparency

Council of the European Union Brussels, 30 June 2015 (OR. en)

The South Africa-European Union Strategic Partnership Joint Action Plan 1

IBA Business and Human Rights Guidance for Bar Associations. Adopted by the IBA Council on 8 October 2015

Vice-President for Budget and Human Resources

Structural Funds: Investing in Roma inclusion at the local and regional level

9360/15 FMA/AFG/cb 1 DG G 3 C

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No /..

Maastricht Communiqué. on the Future Priorities of Enhanced European Cooperation in Vocational Education and Training (VET)

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION

YEREVAN COMMUNIQUÉ. A renewed vision: our priorities

Declaration of the Union for the Mediterranean ministerial meeting on industrial cooperation

Trade Union Vision 2020 for the Baltic Sea Region

Informal Meeting of EU Ministers Responsible for Territorial Cohesion and Urban Matters. Declaration of Ministers towards the EU Urban Agenda

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL. Proposal for an Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Regulation

Delegations will find attached the conclusions adopted by the European Council at the above meeting.

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 22 November /06 DATAPROTECT 45 EDPS 3

Council of the European Union Brussels, 24 November 2014 (OR. en)

ROADMAP. Initial IA screening & planning of further work

VII Joint Council European Union - Mexico Mexico City, 9 February 2012 JOINT COMMUNIQUE 1

OUTCOME OF THE COUNCIL MEETING. 3393rd Council meeting. Transport, Telecommunications and Energy. Energy issues. Luxembourg, 8 June 2015

Employment, Social policy, Health and Consumer affairs Council meeting Brussels, 1 December 2014

FINAL. World Education Forum. The Dakar Framework for Action. Education For All: Meeting our Collective Commitments. Revised Final Draft

OUTCOME OF PROCEEDINGS

UN Human Rights Council UNITED KINGDOM candidate

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

Council of the European Union Brussels, 14 November 2014 (OR. en) Ensuring respect for the rule of law in the European Union

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION ON MONITORING THE APPLICATION OF COMMUNITY LAW (2003) OVERALL POSITION

Council conclusions on entrepreneurship in education and training. EDUCATION, YOUTH, Culture and Sport Council meeting Brussels, 12 December 2014

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 7 October 2003 (OR. en) 12858/03 RECH 152 OC 589

Integrity & sport events

How To Be A Responsible Leader

COMMISSION DECISION. of

Council of the European Union Brussels, 26 January 2016 (OR. en) Delegations Draft Council conclusions on migrant smuggling

At its meeting held on 11 and 12 February 2004 the Working Party completed the third reading of the above Proposal.

8485/15 SC/GDLC/io 1 DGB 1

EN 31IC/11/R7 Original: English Adopted

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

Information Call for participants

BOLOGNA DECLARATION 1!

Delegations will find attached the draft Council conclusions on a Capital Markets Union, as prepared by the Economic and Financial Committee.

Joint Declaration. On the Establishment of the Regional Co-operation Council (RCC)

002375/EU XXV. GP. Eingelangt am 18/11/13 COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 18 November /13

Inter-Institutional Common Approach to Impact Assessment (IA) General principles

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

Doctoral Education in the European Higher Education Area from a University Perspective

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 15.b of the Statute of the Council of Europe,

3 rd Africa Europe Youth Leaders Summit People, Prosperity and Peace. Summit Paper

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a RECOMMENDATION OF THE COUNCIL AND OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

The Bangkok Charter for Health Promotion in a Globalized World

000717/EU XXV. GP. Eingelangt am 05/11/13. Brussels, 5 November 2013 (OR. en) COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION 15317/13

Civilian Headline Goal 2010

REPUBLIC OF PORTUGAL. MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS, TRANSPORT AND COMMUNICATIONS The Minister's Office

EUROPEAN FOOTBALL UNITED FOR THE INTEGRITY OF THE GAME

Handling impact assessments in Council

Work Programme Funding priorities for European Union Programme for Employment and Social Innovation (EaSI)

Policy Paper. Women and Peace and Security Agenda Progress and remaining challenges after 20 years of implementation

FRAMEWORK FOR ADVANCING TRANSATLANTIC ECONOMIC INTEGRATION BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

ETUCE Policy Paper on School Leadership

The New Delhi Commitment: Delivering Inclusive, Relevant Quality Education for All. New Delhi, India 8th 10th November 2012

33rd 3ordinary Session of the Head of State and Government Ouagadougou, 18 January 2008 ECOWAS COMMON APPROACH ON MIGRATION

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HIGH LEVEL PROCESS OF REFLECTION ON PATIENT MOBILITY AND HEALTHCARE

Transcription:

Council of the European Union Brussels, 1 June 2016 (OR. en) 9644/16 OUTCOME OF PROCEEDINGS From: On: 31 May 2016 To: General Secretariat of the Council Delegations SPORT 25 SOC 365 ECOFIN 524 JUR 261 FISC 91 No. prev. doc.: 9069/16 SPORT 21 SOC 266 ECOFIN 407 JUR 227 FISC 80 Subject: Enhancing integrity, transparency and good governance in major sport events - Conclusions of the Council and of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council (31 May 2016) Delegations will find in the annex the Conclusions of the Council and of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council, on enhancing integrity, transparency and good governance in major sport events, adopted by the Council at its 3471st meeting held on 30 and 31 May 2016. 9644/16 KT/lv 1 DGE 1C EN

ANNEX Conclusions of the Council and of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council, on enhancing integrity, transparency and good governance in major sport events TAKING NOTE OF 1. The resolution of the Council and of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States meeting within the Council, of 21 May 2014, on the European Union Work Plan for Sport (2014-2017) of which one of the three main priorities is the integrity of sport; 2. The principles of good governance in sport delivered by the Expert Group on Good Governance in 2013 and the guiding principles relating to democracy, human rights and labour rights, in particular in the context of the awarding procedure for major sport events, delivered by this expert group in January 2016 1 ; 3. The recommendations on major sport events, in particular on legacy aspects with a focus on social, economic and environmental sustainability, delivered by the Expert Group on the Economic Dimension of Sport in January 2016 2 ; 1 2 Doc. 14183/13 and Expert Group on Good Governance (XG GG) - Guiding Principles relating to democracy, human rights and labour rights, in particular in the context of the awarding procedure of major sport events, final document 13 January 2016. Expert Group on the Economic Dimension of Sport (XG ECO) - Recommendations on major sport events, in particular on legacy aspects with a focus on social, economic and environmental sustainability. (The Report of XG ECO). 9644/16 KT/lv 2

4. Global initiatives 3 including initiatives of the international sport movement such as the Olympic Agenda 2020 adopted by the International Olympic Committee during its 127th session held on 12 December 2014, incorporating recommendations devoting significant attention to integrity issues and making sustainable development an integral part of major sport events including the Olympic Games 4 ; STRESSING THAT 5. Major sport events 5 are attractive opportunities to celebrate the performance, values and benefits of sport in a national and international context. Major sport events can be a positive showpiece for sport attracting huge attention among sportspeople, stakeholders and the general public with the potential to inspire adults and children to participate in sport; 6. Major sport events can play an important role in the development of the region or city and garner a great deal in terms of economic, social and environmental impact, if this is carefully planned from the earliest possible stage. The legacy and sustainability of major sport events may have significance both for the legitimacy of and support for major sport events; 3 4 5 E.g. the Declaration of Berlin adopted by the 5th International Conference of Ministers and Senior Officials responsible for Physical Education and Sport (MINEPS V) 28-30 May 2013. International Olympic Committee (2014): Olympic Agenda 2020, 20+20 recommendations. The EU Expert Group on the Economic Dimension of Sport defines a major sporting event as an event organised by one or several host countries, regions or cities and attended by different international delegations with the aim of practising one or several sports. Such events are often characterised by major and logistical challenges. Major sport events have a high international media profile, welcome several thousands of people, including supporters, journalists, technical teams and officials, and are often organised over several consecutive days. 9644/16 KT/lv 3

7. In the context of major sport events relevant integrity and governance issues are raised such as democratic and transparent decision making, accountability, sustainable development and positive legacy, human rights, including children s rights and workers rights and gender equality as well as the prevention of all forms of discrimination, and of the threats to the integrity of sport, such as doping, match-fixing and violence; 8. Due to the attention major sport events attract and the high financial and economic stakes involved, they are vulnerable to processes which can taint the integrity of sport thus making major sport events not only a platform, but a notable test case for integrity, transparency and good governance including sustainability and legacy; AWARE OF 9. The challenges faced by sport organisations, public authorities on a national, regional and local level, companies, media and other partners to make provisions and facilities sustainable and making proper arrangements for a major sport event in all its phases (feasibility, bidding, preparation, organisation, evaluation, legacy); 10. In some cases limited transparency in the procedures and processes of decision making during all phases of major sport events both by the awarding and bidding entities; and the limited implementation of the principles of good governance among international sport federations; 11. The financial, technical, political and legislative requirements and associated costs 6 for major sport events as well as increasingly competitive bids, and possibly overbidding leading to a corresponding escalation of hosting costs, thereby often excluding smaller EU countries and cities from the bidding for and hosting of such events; 6 E.g. operational costs and infrastructural costs related to event, transport and accommodation, safety and security costs. 9644/16 KT/lv 4

12. The withdrawal of a number of candidate cities and countries from the organisation of major sport events in the EU, the decreasing share of major sport events held in the EU and the decreasing level of support by European citizens for hosting these sport events; 7 13. The increased interest of EU countries and sport federations in jointly hosting some major sport events across multiple countries, regions and cities; UNDERLINING 14. The role of national, regional and local public authorities involved in major sport events, for example in financing, infrastructure, environmental protection, safety and security, as well as planning and ensuring the sustainability and legacy of major sport events; 15. Sport organisations are expected to manage their sports in accordance with the basic and recognised principles of good governance, such as transparency, democratic processes, checks and balances and solidarity, given the essentially self-regulated organisation of sport; 16. The importance of strengthened and continuous dialogue and cooperation between public authorities and sport organisations, supported by an appropriate dialogue between the EU and the international sports movement, leading to shared values regarding integrity, transparency and good governance and sustainable development as well as to joint agreements and arrangements taking into account each other s responsibilities and interests; 7 Hover, P. et al. (2016): Integrity and sport events, position paper. Utrecht: Mulier Instituut (March 2016). 9644/16 KT/lv 5

ACCORDINGLY INVITE THE MEMBER STATES, TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE PRINCIPLE OF SUBSIDIARITY, TO 17. Promote and implement integrity, transparency and good governance in major sport events, during all phases of the event (feasibility, bidding, preparation, organisation, evaluation, legacy) including the period after the closure of the event, addressing all stakeholders involved as partners in the event, by initiatives such as: a) Guaranteeing the use of transparent and democratic procedures during all phases of major sport events and require all other partners to do so, with special attention to informing and involving the public, to independent reporting, auditing, evaluation and accountability, and to perform a reliable cost-benefit analysis preceding the decision of the bid; b) Using transparent and relevant criteria for public support of the organisations involved, demanding e.g. the implementation of the basic principles of good governance, and the transparency and democracy of procedures used by these organisations; c) Requesting from all stakeholders involved as partners in major sports event to comply with recognized international standards and participate in initiatives such as UN Global Compact, UN Guiding principles on Business and Human Rights, ISO 26000 and 20121; d) Using transparent and relevant principles as the basis for providing public support of major sport events regarding specific integrity issues such as human rights, including children s rights and workers rights and gender equality, as well as the prevention of all forms of discrimination and threats to the integrity of sport, such as doping, matchfixing and violence; 9644/16 KT/lv 6

18. Ensure a long-term and positive legacy of major sport events as part of good governance, as well as social, economic and environmental sustainability in the context of the urban and regional development in EU Member States; INVITE THE MEMBER STATES AND THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION WITHIN THEIR RESPECTIVE COMPETENCES TO 19. Incorporate integrity, transparency, good governance, sustainability and legacy of major sport events in future work on sport at EU level, including facilitating exchange of information and discussions of relevant topics in relation to major sport events; 20. Support the implementation of criteria and procedures related to integrity, transparency and good governance, including sustainability and legacy, of major sport events, where appropriate, based on the existing guidelines and recommendations and in compliance with recognized international declarations and standards, which could be used as reference points by Member States and local authorities for public support of major sport events; 21. Identify and develop models for public-private cooperation and exchange good practices regarding this cooperation, which could be used by Member States and local authorities when entering into partnership agreements for the staging of major sport events with specific attention for sport events that take place in multiple countries, regions and cities; 9644/16 KT/lv 7

INVITE THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION TO 22. Launch a study on hosting major sport events in multiple countries, and regions within the EU, taking into account possible administrative and legislative obstacles at national and European level and the expected impacts of such events; 23. Support transnational projects and, where relevant, independent research on the integrity, transparency and good governance of major sport events including sustainability and legacy aspects, in the framework of EU funding programmes such as Erasmus+ and Horizon 2020; 24. Encourage sharing and publishing of good practices and learning experiences and facilitate the transfer of knowledge between the EU Member States and the sport movement about the integrity, transparency and good governance of major sport events, including sustainability and legacy aspects as well as support and encourage the identification, and, if necessary, the development of methods and tools, including: a. reliable cost-benefit analyses; b. measuring the support of the population; c. measuring the social, economic and environmental impacts and legacies of major sport events; d. external and independent evaluation of major sport events; 25. Develop a light monitoring system, such as pledge board or by use of the UN Global Compact, to measure progress towards integrity, transparency and good governance for hosting organisations of major sport events in EU Member States; 9644/16 KT/lv 8

INVITE THE INTERNATIONAL SPORT MOVEMENT, TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE AUTONOMY OF SPORT, TO CONSIDER TO 26. Continue to organise accessible and attractive major sport events that are a showpiece for the positive values of sport and the role of sport in society and the promotion of social cohesion; 27. Encourage the implementation of the basic principles of good governance leading to transparency, democratic processes, checks and balances and solidarity regarding the organisation of major sport events and to comply with recognized international standards and participate in initiatives such as the UN Global Compact, the UN Guiding principles on Business and Human Rights and ISO 26000 and 20121; 28. Promote, implement and monitor integrity, transparency and good governance in major sport events, during the different phases of the event including feasibility, bidding, preparation, organisation, evaluation and legacy, and address all stakeholders involved as partners in the event; 29. Employ transparent and democratic procedures during all phases of major sport events and require all other partners to do so, with special attention to informing and involving the national, regional and local sport organisations, the general public and to independent reporting, auditing, evaluation and accountability; 30. Develop and publish a catalogue of realistic requirements in the bidding phase of major sport events including transparent selection procedures and relevant selection criteria for the awarding of major sport events, regarding specific integrity issues such as human rights, including children s rights and workers rights and gender equality, as well as the prevention of all forms of discrimination, and threats to the integrity of sport such as doping, matchfixing and violence; 9644/16 KT/lv 9

31. Actively promote social, economic and environmental sustainability and a long-term and positive legacy of major sport events as part of good governance, in the requirements of the contract with the hosting organisation and the monitoring of the event 8 ; INVITE THE MEMBER STATES, THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION AND THE INTERNATIONAL SPORT MOVEMENT WITHIN THEIR RESPECTIVE COMPETENCES TO 32. Continue and intensify dialogue between Member States, the European Commission and the sport movement about integrity, transparency and good governance including sustainability and legacy of major sport events; 33. Agree on a shared agenda, starting in the first instance with the Olympic Movement and the responsible international football organisations, and with the aim to expand to other international sport federations, to improve integrity, good governance and transparency during all phases of major sport events, and addressing all stakeholders involved in the partnership needed to organise these events, thus also activating the positive potential and sustainability and legacy of major events and regaining the trust of EU citizens; 34. Undertake common actions such as: a) developing guiding models for public-private cooperation to be used in the organisation of major sport events at national level; b) developing a code of conduct for all public and private parties involved in hosting organisations of major sport events, where appropriate; 8 The Report of the XG ECO, in particular recommendations 1 to 7 and 21. 9644/16 KT/lv 10

c) exchanging information and discuss topics regarding future major sport events such as the sustainability and legacy, criteria related to integrity and good governance, specific demands of associations and associated costs, possible administrative and legislative obstacles at European level and a safe and secure environment for events; d) making use of existing models and, where appropriate, developing new models of joint multi-country major sport events; e) encouraging event organizers to conduct a survey of the social, economic and environmental impact of the event to the hosting country, region or city after the closure of the event; 35. Organise a regular high-level dialogue as part of the EU structured dialogue on sport 9, with governmental representatives, representatives of the European and international Olympic movement and European and international sport federations involved in major sport events, and independent experts, where appropriate. Based on a shared agenda and actions, such as mentioned in paragraph 34, the topics regarding major sport events, where governments and sport organisations share responsibilities, and exchange information, could be discussed. 9 OJ C 322, 27.11.2010 9644/16 KT/lv 11