U. S. Citizenship. and Immigration Services. FILE: EAC 03 08 1 53 1711 Office: VERMONT SERVICE CENTER Date:



Similar documents
Petition for a Nonirnmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section lol(a)(ls)(h)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 1 lol(a)(ls)(h)(i)(b)

Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section lol(a)(ls)(h)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C l(a)( 15)(H)(i)(b)

FILE: EAC Office: VERMONT SERVICE CENTER Date:

FILE: WAC Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: NOV C

FILE: Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: hpff 0 g m#

pqj%lic COPY P= vent dearly u n w d %Ha$ -- on of oersona1 orkw data dekfed to &&&bg and Immigration U. S. Citizenship Services PETITION:

and Immigration Services A/

FILE: WAC Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: I ,, 1'.

PUBLIC COPY. and Immigration. U.S. Citizenship. FILE: WAC Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: ApR 1 g 2a)5

FILE: WAC Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: UG

Petition for a Nonimrnigrant Worker Pursuant to Section lol(a)(ls)(h)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 1 lol(a)(ls)(h)(i)(b)

Petition for a Nonimrnigrant Worker Pursuant to Section lol(a)(ls)(h)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 1 lol(a)(ls)(h)(i)(b)

U. S. Citizenship and Immigration

FILE: SRC Office: TEXAS SERVICE CENTER Date: APR s

PUBLIC COPY. identiging Qta b. and Immigration. invasion of pe~onal pdvay. prevent clear lr J unwmw. Services. U.S. Citizenship

U. S. Citizenship and Immigration

FILE: EAC Office: VERMONT SERVICE CENTER Date:,,,

Specialty Occupations and Positions - Overview of the US Citizens Visa Agreements

U. S. Citizenship and Immigration Services

FILE: EAC Office: VERMONT SERVICE CENTER Date: SEP 3 9

PUBtlC COPY. identijring data deleted to. invasion of personal privacy. prevent clearly unwarranted. and Immigration. U.S.

FILE: WAC Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: APR O

FILE: WAC Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: JUN

Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section lol(a)(ls)(h)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C l(a)(ls)(h)(i)(b)

What is a Proffered Position in the USA?

FILE: WAC Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: AUG

' Administrative 2ddzr5? PUBLIC COPY. and Immigration. invasion of personal privacy. identifying data deleted to. U. S.

U. S. Citizenship and Immigration Services

FILE: WAC Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: 0

PUBLIC COPY. 'nvotsion ofper~onal privacy. identifiir~g data deletbd to. and Immigration. pfevent clearly hinwmted. Services. U. S. Citizenship IN RE:

and Immigration Services

FILE: EAC Office: VERMONT SERVICE CENTER Date: AuG

FILE: WAC Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: APR F

invasion of personal privacy

U.S.Citizenship and Immigration

FILE: WAC Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: ~ny 2 8

Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b)

and Immigration U.S. Citizenship Services l, -9 Office: VEMONT SERVICE CENTER D ~ PETITION:

FILE: WAC Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: APR

FILE: WAC Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: NAR 1 6

FILE: WAC Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: fim 2 g 2l)ljtj

Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER

FILE: EAC Office: VERh4ONT SERVICE CENTER Date: JUL

U. S. Citizenship and Immigration

FILE: EAC Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: ' 28Q6

Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section lol(a)(ls)(h)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 1 lol(a)(ls)(h)(i)(b)

How To Get A Nursing Job In Vermont

u. S. Citizenship PUBLIC COP'y invasion ofpersonal pnvacy identifying data deleted to prevent clearly unwarr~ted and Immigration Services

PUBLIC COPY. and Immigration. invasion of personal privacy. identifying data deleted to prevent clearly c r-wmmted. U. S.

U. S. Citizenship. and Immigration. Services FILE: MAY 0 4. Petitioner: Beneficiary: PETITION:

FILE: WAC Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: APR

apeatgiog data deleted to

and Immigration Services

FILE: WAC Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date:

FILE: EAC Office: VERMONT SERVICE CENTER Date: AUG

Petition for a ~on&nigrant Worker Pursuant to Section 10 1 (a)(l S)(H)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. $ 1 lol(a)(ls)(h)(i)@)

U. S. Citizenship and Immigration Services

Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section lol(a)(ls)(h)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C (a)(lS)(H)(i)(b)

Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b) ofthe Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b)

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration

PUBLIC COPY. identieing data deleted to. and Immigration. invasion of personal privacy. U.S. Citizenship. prevent clearly u n w d.

and Immigration U. S. Citizenship Services FILE: WAC Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: JAN Petitioner: Beneficiary: 8

FILE: WAC Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: NOV

PUBLIC COPY. u.s. Citizenship. invasion of&m~ml pivacy. and Imigration. identifying data deleted to. prevent ci6,aly unwarranted

~..,.~{! J)}.'- u.s. Citizenship. PUBLIC COpy. Identifying-cllllll4tD- invasion ofpersonal pnv~y. prevent clearly unw~ted. and Immigration Services

FILE: Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date:

Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section lol(a)(ls)(h)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 4 1 lol(a)(ls)(h)(i)(b)

and Immigration U. S. Citizenship FILE: EAC Office: VERMONT SERVICE CENTER

FILE: EAC Office: VERMONT SERVICE CENTER Date: A&

PUBLIC COPY, and Immigration. invasion of personal privacy. identity 1 kt,!. :'.. k~~fltd U, prevent cleai r j L;L. -@ U. S. Citizenship.

paeveat clearly unwarrante:

Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 1l01(a)(15)(H)(i)(b)

FILE: WAC Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: 2 2 2OuS

Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER

Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section 101(a)(l5)(H)(i)(b) ofthe Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b)

f'(i,lx"'- ~~ Robert P. Wiemann, Chief Administrative Appeals Office u.s. Citizenship PUBLICCOP"i invasion ofpersonal privacy

FILE: EAC Office: VERMONT SERVICE CENTER Date: DEC

~ardon dbem erlmo PUBLIC COPY

U. S. Citizenship and Immigration

Selecting a Specialty Occupation Based on Contract Laws

(b)(6) OFFICE: NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER.

FILE: LIN Office: NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER Date: JUN

FILE: WAC Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER ~ate:dec 0 8 2W19

Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section 10 1 (a)(l S)(H)(i)(b) of the

Office: VERMONT SERVICE CENTER

flu^& identiiliagcbqldt6 PIlBLIC COPY invasion of personal privacy prevent clearly unwarranted

FILE: LIN Office: NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER Date:

FILE: WAC Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: &PI

and Immigration Services U. S. Citizenship Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: MAR 1 4 WAC

U. S. Citizenship and Immigration

How To Get A Job In The United States

FILE: EAC 03 i Office: VERMONT SERVICE CENTER DatdAN

Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER

FILE: WAC Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date:

PUBLIC COPY. idaaifybgbdehib. prevent clearly uninvasion. and Immigration. of personal pivrey. U.S. Citizenship. Services. rn RE:

JB' U. S. Citizenship and Immigration. FILE: EAC Office: VERMONT SERVICE CENTER ~ateja I

(b)(6) OFFICE: TEXAS SERVICE CENTER

FILE: WAC Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: MAR

U. S. Citizenship and Immigration Services

identitjring dat? Meted t6 ppevent cler~iy tmwmanted

Transcription:

U.S. Department of Homeland Security 20 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Rm. A3042 Washington, DC 20529 U. S. Citizenship and Immigration Services FILE: EAC 03 08 1 53 1711 Office: VERMONT SERVICE CENTER Date: PETRION: Petition for a Noni grant Worker Pursuant to Section ]iob(a)(ls)(h)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 1104(a)(15)(H)(i)(b) This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. A11 materials have been returned to the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. Robert I?. Wiemann, Director AdH?ninistrative Appeals Office

EAC 03 081 5319'1 Page 2 DISCUSSION: The service center director denied the noni grant visa petition. The matter is now on appeal before the Administrative Appeals Office (MO). The appeal will be dismissed. The petition will be denied. The petitioner is a long-term medical cage facility and nursing home. It seeks to employ the beneficiary as a registered nurse supervisor and to classi grant worker in a specialty occupation pwsumt to section IOl(a)(%S)(H)(i)(b) of the ration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. 3 1601 (a>( l5>03>(i>(b>. The director denied she petition on the ground that the record failed establish to that the proffered position is a specialty occupation. Section 214(i)(1) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 1184(i)(1), defines the tern "specialty occupation" as an occupation that requires: (A) (B) theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge, and attakment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty (or its equivalent) as a minimum for entry into the occupation in the United States. As provided in 8 C.F.R. 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A), to qualify as a specialty occupation the position must meet one of the fo18owing criteria: (I) A baccalaureate or higher degree or its equivalent is nomally the minimum requirement for entry into the particular position; (2) The degree requirement is common to the industry in parallel positions among similar organizations a, in the alternative, an employer may show that its particular position is so complex or unique that it can be performed only by an individual with a degree; 43) The employer normally requires a degree or its equivalent for the position; or (4) The nature of she specific duties is so specialized and complex that knowledge required to perfom the duties is usually associated with the attainment of a baccalaureate or higher degree. Citizenship and I gration Services (CIS) interprets the tern "degree" in the criteria at 8 C.F.R. 2114.2(h)(4)(iii)(A) to mean not just any baccalaureate or higher degree, but one in a specific specialty that is directly related ao the proffered position. The record of proceeding before the AAO contains (1) Fom 1-129 and supporting documentation; (2) the director's request for evidence ( ); (3) the petitioner's response to the ;(4) the director9 s decision; and 45) Form I-290B, counsel's appeal brief, and supporting materials. The AAO reviewed the record in its entirety before issuing its decision.

EAC 03 081 531171 Page 3 The petitioner describes itself as a long-term sub-acute medical care facility and nursing home, established in 1957, with approximately 175 employees and gross annual income of around $1 1.4 million in 2001. Hnm Form 1-129 the petitioner stated that it wanted to hire the beneficiary as a registered nurse supervisor, though in a letter accompanying the petition t h e petitioner9 s administrator, identified the proffered position as a nurse manager. -scribed the duties of the nurse manager position as: Plan[ning], coordinat[ing], direct[ing] and evaluat[ing] work performance of all unit staff under the beneficiary's supervision... directing day to day functioning of the assigned unit and directing the activities of a11 other... nurses on the shift, including other RNs [registered nurses], LPNs [licensed practical nurses], CNAs [certified nursing assistants], and aides. %he Nurse Manager is responsible for all unit activities.... The Nurse Manager is directly responsible to the Supervisory Nurse, who in turn is directly responsible to the head nurse and Administration. The Nurse Manager oversees a41 training and discipline of all unit staff under [her] supervision. The minimum educational requirement for the proffered position, i n d i c a t e d in her letter, was a bachelor's degree in nursing (B.S.N.). The beneficiary received a bachelor of science in nursing from Cebu University, in the Philippines, on April 13, 1991. In a letter responding to the which requested among other things a more detailed description of the job duties, counsel referred to the proffered position once again as a registered nurse supervisor and submitted the petitioner's list of the job duties, which included the SolPowing: Supervise unit staff to assure care is provided in a manner consistent witla this facility's mission statement, that is, to provide professional care with dignity, comfort, compassion and respect. Supervise unit staff to assure the coordination, development, implementation and evaluation of the nursing regimen on each nursing unit. Communicate with staff to disseminate infomation essential to the continuity of care. Collaborate with staff as necessary to evaluate nursing problems and implement corrective actions as appropriate. Assist in coordinating and implementing the quality assessment and assurance program. Comnplete nursing department audits as assigned by the Director of Nursing Services, including bent not limited to (a) pressure sores, (b) incontinence management, (c) physicauchemical. restraints, (d) tube feedings, (e) weights, (f) medications delivery and administration. Generate on site corrections related to audit findings via one-to-one discussion and observation with appropriate person(s) involved. Perform infection control surveillance in compliance with institutional policies and procedures. Act as a resources person for staff members. Identify staff needs for training and comunicate this to the staff development coordinator, assisting with in-service projects as appropriate. Assist the staff development coordinator in assessing the competency of all nursing staff.

EAC 03 081 531'71 Page 4 W Assist in the evaluation of nursing staff. ImpBemnt progressive disciplinary action as appropriate. Coordinate staffing for each unit's needs. Collaborate with other departments as necessary to assure successful implementation of interdepa~mental programs. Also submitted in response to the Wd was a photocopy of the beneficiary's license as a registered professional nurse, issued by the State of New York on February 10, 2003. The service center determined that the proffered position was not a specialty occupation. The director found that the duties of the proffered position paralleled those of a nurse supervisor as described in the Department of Labor (D0L)'s Occupational Outlook Handbook (Handbook), and noted the Handbook's indication that such a position could be performed by a nurse with less than a B.S.N. degree. In the director's view, the proffered position was not so specialized, complex, or unique that it could only be performed by an individual with a B.S.N. degree. The director was not persuaded by the evidence of record that a B.S.N. degree is normally the minimum requirement for entry into the particular position or that a B.S.N. requirement is comon to the industry in parallel positions among similar organizations. Furthemore, the director was not persuaded by the petitioner's "perfunctory bachelor's degree requirement" for the subject position that it normally needed to hire individuals at that degree level for the position. In the director's judgement, therefore, the proffered position did not qualify as a specialty occupation under any of the criteria enumerated at 8 C.F.R. 3 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A). In determining whether a position meets the statutory and regulatory criteria of a specialty occupation, CIS routinely consults the Handbook, supra, as an authoritative source of infomation about the duties and educational requirements of particular occupations. Factors bypically considered are whether the Handbook indicates a degree is required by the industry; whether the industry's professional association has made a degree a ~nirnum entry requirement; and whether letters or affidavits from fims or individuals in the industry attest that such fims "routinely employ and recruit only degreed indivicluals." See Shanti, Inc. v. Reno, 36 F.Supp. 2d 1151, 1165 (D.Minn. 1999) (quoting kbir&blaker Cop v. Sava, 712 F.Supp. 1095, 1102 (S.D.N.Y. 1989)). CIS also analyzes the specific duties and complexity of the posilion at issue, with the Handbook's occupational descriptions as a reference, as well as the petitioner's past hiring practices for the position. See Shanki, id, at 1165-66. On appeal counsel asserts that the proffered position is a high-level adarainistrative and supervisory position requiring a B.S.N. degree, as discussed in an I gration and Naturalization Service policy memorandum in November 2002 providing guidance for CIS on the adjudication of H-BB petitions for registered nurses (H-1B Memorandum), and thus qualifies as a specialty occupation. Hn surveying the educational requirements for the nursing occupation, the H-BB Memorandum notes that the minimum requirement for entry into the field as a registered nurse is a two-year associate degree in nursing (A.D.N.). Though a four-year B.S.N. can be earned at some U.S. and foreign universities, the degree is not required for most entry-level nursing positions in the United States. The H-IB Memorandum "'Head nurses or saurse supervisors direct nursing act~vities, particularly in hospitals. They plan work schedules and assign duties to nurses and aides, provide or arrange for training, and visit patients to observe nlwses and to ensure that the patnents receive proper care. They also may ensure that records are maintained and equipment and supplies are ordered." Handbook, 2004-05 edition, at 302.

EAC 03 081 53171 Page 5 indicates that certain advanced practice nurses - such as clinical nurse specialists, nurse practitioners, certified registered nurse anesthetists, or certified nurse-midwives - do require a B.S.N. or higher degree, which makes them specialty occupations. Likewise, some nursing specialties - such as critical care, perioperative, rehabilitation nursing, oncology, and pediatric nursing - require a B.S.N. or equivalent knowledge, making them specialty occupations as well. In addition, some nurses in high-level management positions - "such as an upper-level 'nurse manager9 in a hospital ad~nistration," according to the H-HB Memorandum - require a B.S.N. or higher degree, making them specialty occupations. The position at issue in this case, however, is not an "upper-level n-mse manager" within the contemplation of the W-1B Memorandum. The petitioner's organizational chart indicates that a Director of Nursing Services is in overall charge of nursing services, and that immediately subordinate to her is an Assistant Director of Nursing Services. Below those two positions are the petitioner's nursing supervisors and nurse managers, who supervise the licensed staff of RNs, LPNs, CNAs, and feeding assistants. Thus, whether the proffered position is a nurse supervisor or a nurse manager, it is clearly a ~ddle-management position two or three mngs below the top nursing position. Although the proffered position involves first-pine supervision of nmses and other heahhcare aides, such denties do not enhance the position to that of an M-BB level nkarse administrator. There is no indication in the Handbook or in the H-1B Memorandum that nurse supervisors, though their duties may exceed those of some other registered nurses, require a B.S.N. as a minimum degree requirement for entry into such a position. Rather, it would appear thaa a two- or three-year associate degree in nursing is often sufficient educational background. Accordingly, the AAO determines that a baccalaureate or higher degree in the specific specialty of nursing - i.e., a B.S.N. - is not the ~ nimum requirement for entry into the nursing position proffered by the petitioner, as required to meet the first alternative criterion of a specialty occupation set forth in 8 C.F.R. 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(I). With respect to the second alternative criterion of a specialty occupation, rhe xecord does not establish that a B.S.N. degree is common to the industry in parallel positions among similar organizations, as required for the subject nursing position to qualify as a specialty occupation under the first prong of 8 C.F.R. 5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(2b. Though counsel alleges thaa the Vermont Service Center approved over 40 similar H-1B petitions he filed for registered nurses "involving all manner of critical care and specialty positions" in hospitals and other healthcare facilities in the New York City area, counsel has provided no analysis of those decisions. nor shown that the positions in those cases parallel the proffered position in this case. Furthemore, the AAO notes that all of the referenced approvals in the record predate the issuance of the H-IB Memorandum in November 2002. If the prior petitions were approved based on evidence substaneiapliy similar to the evidence subngtted in this proceeding, the approvals would have been erroneous. CIS is not required to approve petitions when eligibility has not been demonstrated merely because of prior approvals that may have been erroneous. See, e.g., Matter of Church Scientology International, 19 I&N Dec. 593. 597 (Cornm. 1988). Each noni grant petition is a separate proceeding with a separate record. See 8 C.F.R. 5 103.8(d). In making a detehnation of statutory eligibility, CIS is limited to the infomation contained in the petitioner's record of proceeding. See 8 C.F.R. 5 103.2(b)(IQ)(ii). Moreover, the AAO is never bound by a decision issued by a service center or a district director. See Louisiana Philharmonic Orchestra v. HMS, 2000 WL 282785 (E.D. La.), a fd 248 F.3d 1139 (5th Cir. 20011, cert. denied, 122 S.Ct. 51 (2008). Only published precedent decisions are binding on all CIS employees in the administration of the Act. See 8 C.F.R. 5 103.3(c). Unpublished decisions are not binding. Thus, the approvals cited by counsel have no legal bearing on the AAO's

EAC 03 081 53171 Page 6 determination of the instant case. Accordingly, the record does not show that the proffered position qualifies as a specialty occupation under the first prong of 8 C.F.R. 5 214.2(h)(Lk)( i)(a)(2). Nor has the petationer demonstrated that its nursing position is so complex or unique that it can be performed only by an individual with a B.S.N. degree, as required to qualify it as a specialty occupation under the second prong of 8 C.F.R. 3 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(2). As for the third alternative criterion of a specialty occupation, counsel asserts that the petitioner normally requires a B.S.N. degree for its nursing supervisor position because that has been its hiring policy since January 1, 1997, thereby quali6ing the position as specialty occupations under 8 C.F.R. $ 214.2 (h)(4)(iii)(a)(s). The petitioner has submitted photocopies of its standard job descriptions for nwsing supervisors and nurse managers - "effective 4/1/97" - outlining the position summary, essential responsibilities, and minimum qualifications (including a B.S.N.) for each position. According to the petitioner, in a list provided with its Form 1-129, it employed eight nurse supervisors andor nurse managers at the time the petition was filed, five of whom were hired before January 1, 1997 (one with only an associate's degree), and thee of whom were hired after January 1, 1997, a11 with B.S.N. degrees. The list has not been supplemented with employment records, curriculum vitae, or other evidence, however, documenting that those individuals are actually employed by the petitioner. Also submitted on appeal is a job posting from the petitioner for registered nurses with B.S.N. degrees to fill seven nurse manager and supervisory nurse positions. No evidence of hiring nurses with B.S.N. degrees as a result of these job announcements was submitted. Simply going on record without supporting documentation does not satisfy the petitioner's burden of proof. See Matter of Treasure Craft of California, 14 I&N Dec. 190, 1193-94 (Reg. Cornm. 1972). To qualify as a specialty occupation under 8 C.F.R. 3 234.2 (h)(4)(iii)(a)(3), the petitioner must establish that its degree requirement is compelled by the performance demands of the position. The critical issue is not the employer's self-imposed standard, but whether the position actually requires the theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge and the attainment of a baccalaureate or higher degree in the specific specialty as a minimurn for entry into the occupation. CJ: Defenssr a?. Meissner, 201 F.3d 384, 387-88 (5th Cir. 2000). For the reasons previously discussed in this decision, the A40 is not persuaded that the performance demands of the supervisory nurse position at issue in this case - which do not exceed the scope of an ordinary supervisory nurse as described in the Handook - are demanding enough to compel the petitioner to require a B.S.N. degree. The AAO concludes that the proffered position does not qualify as a specialty occupation mder 8 C.F.R. 3 214.2 (h)(4)(iii)(a)(3). With reference to the fourth alternative criteplon of a specialty occupation, at 8 C.F.R. 5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)g4), the record does not establish that the duties of the subject position are so specialized and complex that howpedge associated with a B.S.N. is required to perfom them. Counsel argues in the appeal that the knowledge gained in a B.S.N. degree program is far greater than in an A.D.N. degree, and necessary to perform the services of a nursing supervisor position. Counsel cites a letter submitted on appeal by o f East Meadow, New Yak, who asserts that he is familiar with ihe petitioner's fzity and that all of its nurse administrative positions - including head nurse, nursing supervisors, nursing managers, and - must have B.S.N. degrees because of the depth of howledge their jobs require. assertions are vague on detail, however, and make no distinction between the knowledge and responsibility level of the petitioner's top nursing position, Director of Nursing Services, and its mid-level nurse supervisor positions. Nor does the letter explain why an experienced nurse with a two- or thee-year A.D.N. degree could not equally

EAC 03 081 53171 Page 7 perfom the services of the nurse supervisor position at issue in this case. The Handbook indicates that nwse supervisor positions are commonly held by registered nurses without baccalaureate degrees. The duties of the proffered position, to the extent they are described in the record, do not appear so specialized or complex that they require howledge associated with a B.S.N. For the reasons discussed above, the record does not establish that the proffered position meets any of the criteria set forth in 8 C.F.R. 8 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A) to qualify as a specialty occupation. The petitioner has not estabhshed that the beneficiary will be commg temporarily to the United States to perform services in a specially occupation, as required section 101(a)(15Q(H)(i)(b) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. $ 1101 caaq1s)m>(i>(b>. The petihner bears the burden of proof in these proceedings. See section 291 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. tj 1341. The petih~e~ has not sustained that burden. Accordingly, the AA0 will not distlnrb the director's decision denyng the petition. OmEW: The appeal is dismissed. The petition is denied.