Hospital Quality Program Evaluation & Scoring Methodology. December 20, 2013

Similar documents
MEASURING CARE QUALITY

Achieving Quality and Value in Chronic Care Management

Value Based Purchasing (VBP) Awareness Brief. FY 2018 Value Based Purchasing Program Domain Weighting

A Detailed Data Set From the Year 2011

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Acute Care Hospital Fiscal Year (FY) 2018 Quality Improvement Program Measures

Overview of the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Fiscal Year (FY) 2017

National Provider Call: Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program

Mar. 31, 2011 (202) Improving Quality of Care for Medicare Patients: Accountable Care Organizations

Care Gap Care Reminder Description Reference Cardiovascular Persistence of Beta- Blocker Treatment After a Heart Attack (PBH)

HEdis Code Quick Reference Guide Disease Management Services

AETNA BETTER HEALTH OF MISSOURI

Colorado Medicaid HEDIS 2014 Results STATEWIDE AGGREGATE REPORT

Patient Centered Medical Home

Clinical Quality Measure Crosswalk: HEDIS, Meaningful Use, PQRS, PCMH, Beacon, 10 SOW

HEDIS/CAHPS 101. August 13, 2012 Minnesota Measurement and Reporting Workgroup

Weight Assessment and Counseling for Nutrition and Physical Activity for Children/Adolescents BMI Percentile (Total)

SUMMARY TABLE OF MEASURES, PRODUCT LINES AND CHANGES

SUMMARY TABLE OF MEASURE CHANGES

2013 ACO Quality Measures

Medical Billing Requirements - Medicaid Incentive Checklist

11/2/2015 Domain: Care Coordination / Patient Safety

Hospital Value-based Purchasing Specifications 2016 Updated August 2015

See page 331 of HEDIS 2013 Tech Specs Vol 2. HEDIS specs apply to plans. RARE applies to hospitals. Plan All-Cause Readmissions (PCR) *++

Accountable Care Organization

ABELMed EHR-EMR/PM version 12, an ONC HIT 2014 Edition Complete EHR, has been certified for the following 42 clinical quality measures (CQMs).

CMS Office of Public Affairs MEDICARE PROPOSES NEW HOSPITAL VALUE-BASED PURCHASING PROGRAM

Chapter Three Accountable Care Organizations

NCQA Health Insurance Plan Ratings Methodology March 2015

MaineCare Value Based Purchasing Initiative

Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program

SUMMARY TABLE OF MEASURES, PRODUCT LINES AND CHANGES

Chapter Seven Value-based Purchasing

June 10, Dear Mr. Slavitt:

ACO Program: Quality Reporting Requirements. Jennifer Faerberg Mary Wheatley April 28, 2011

Meaningful Use Stage 2: Important Implications for Pediatrics

Coventry Health Care of Florida, Inc. Coventry Health Plan of Florida, Inc. Coventry Health and Life Insurance Company Commercial Lines of Business

Description of the OECD Health Care Quality Indicators as well as indicator-specific information

How To Earn Shared Savings From An Insurance Program

ATTACHMENT B Care Management Organization (CMO) Quality Incentive Payment Methodology

2016 HEDIS & Quality Assurance Reporting Requirements Measures Provider Reference Guide

Texas Medicaid Managed Care and Children s Health Insurance Program

2016 HEDIS /QRS/QARR/EES Physician Documentation Guidelines and Administrative Codes

TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Mid-Year Updates Note: NCQA Benchmarks & Thresholds 2014

Value-Based Purchasing Program Overview. Maida Soghikian, MD Grand Rounds Scripps Green Hospital November 28, 2012

Vermont ACO Shared Savings Program Quality Measures: Recommendations for Year 2 Measures from the VHCIP Quality and Performance Measures Work Group

Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS ) Guide

Table 1 Performance Measures. Quality Monitoring P4P Yr1 Yr2 Yr3. Specification Source. # Category Performance Measure

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES & 42 CFR CFR

FY 2016 Inpatient PPS Proposed Rule Quality Issues May 21, 2015

Three-Star Composite Rating Method

Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield 2014 Quality-In-Sights Cardiology and Obstetrics/Gynecology Quality Incentive Program

Evidence Based Practice to. Value Based Purchasing. Barb Rogness BSN MS Building Bridges May 2013

Ohio Health Homes Learning Community Meeting. Overview of Health Homes Measures

Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Program: Part 1 of 4: A Detailed Review of the Final CMS FY 2014 IPPS Rule

2013 MEDICARE FEE-FOR-SERVICE QUALITY AND RESOURCE USE REPORT

Coding Seminar: Tips to Improve HEDIS Measures. Charlotte Kohler, CPA, CVA, CPAM, CPC, CHBC

CLINICAL QUALITY MEASURES FINALIZED FOR ELIGIBLE HOSPITALS AND CRITICAL ACCESS HOSPITALS BEGINNING WITH FY 2014

Explanation of CMS Proposed Performance Measurement Framework for ACOs and Comparison with IHA P4P Measure Set April 2011

How We Rate Hospitals

2010 QARR QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE Adults

Overview of Clinical Quality Measures Reporting in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Final Rule on Meaningful Use

QUALITY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 2015 EVALUATION

ProviderReport. Message from the CEO. Provider Relations adds Provider Partnership team

1. How are you using health IT enabled clinical quality measures for internal quality improvement efforts and patients care?

Many of the changes that have been made to this final rule were directly responsive to CMA s comments.

Childhood Immunization Status (CIS)

HEDIS Quick Reference Guide Updated to reflect NCQA HEDIS 2016 Technical Specifications

CQMs. Clinical Quality Measures 101

Medicare Shared Savings Program Quality Measure Benchmarks for the 2015 Reporting Year

Cognos Web-based Analytic Tool Overview

Value Based Purchasing Hospital Program FY 13 Final Rule

The Leapfrog Hospital Survey Scoring Algorithms. Scoring Details for Sections 2 9 of the 2016 Leapfrog Hospital Survey

Improving Quality of Care for Medicare Patients: Accountable Care Organizations

Presented by Kathleen S. Wyka, AAS, CRT, THE AFFORDABLE CA ACT AND ITS IMPACT ON THE RESPIRATORY C PROFESSION

SUMMARY TABLE OF MEASURES, PRODUCT LINES AND CHANGES

Total Health Quality Indicators For Providers 2015

Test Procedure for (j) Calculate and Submit Clinical Quality Measures

New Jersey Delivery System Reform Incentive Program

Accountable Care Organizations: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

2016 HEDIS 1 Measures Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set

Quality Scorecard overall heart attack care overall heart failure overall pneumonia care overall surgical infection rate patient safety survival

Florida Center for Health Information and Policy Analysis

Meaningful Use: Stage 1: Functional Measures Eligible Professionals (EPs)

Performance Measurement for the Medicare and Medicaid Eligible (MME) Population in Connecticut Survey Analysis

SUMMARY TABLE OF MEASURE CHANGES

The Use of MHCC Data to Support Monitoring of the New Medicare Waiver

A COMPARISON OF MEDI-CAL MANAGED CARE P4P MEASURE SETS

Meaningful Use: Registration, Attestation, Workflow Tips and Tricks

Medicare 2015 QI Program Evaluation

Maximizing Limited Care Management Resources to Improve Clinical Quality and Ensure Safe Transitions

HEDIS 2010 Summary Table of Measures, Product Lines and Changes Applicable to:

Truven Health Analytics: Market Expert Inpatient Volume Projection Methodology

Model ACO Contract Language

UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS HOSPITAL & HEALTH SCIENCES SYSTEM: FINANCIAL REPORT AND SYSTEM DASHBOARDS May 29, 2013

Capture of the Pediatric Core Measures from Electronic Health Records by Two Category A Grantees

Aligning Incentives for Quality: Pharmacy's Role in Achieving Hospital and National Goals. Objectives. National Organizations: Key Linkages

AGENCY-SPECIFIC PLAN FOR THE NATIONAL QUALITY STRATEGY

FY 2015 Inpatient PPS Proposed Rule Quality Provisions Webinar

what value-based purchasing means to your hospital

Linking Quality to Payment

Transcription:

Hospital Quality Program Evaluation & Scoring Methodology December 20, 2013

DISCLAIMER The following content represents the Evaluation and Scoring Approach Appendix of the 2014 Hospital Quality Program. The reader is advised to review the content in context of the Hospital Quality Program Policy Manual. - Page 2 -

Introduction to the Hospital Quality Program (HQP) Program Introduction: The Hospital Quality Program (HQP) is BCBSNC s third generation quality program for acute care hospitals to improve care outcomes. The HQP program will measure hospital performance using a standard set of quality measures in a collaborative manner with the hospital community. What is Different? The new program expands and standardizes the quality measurement set, and emphasizes the collaborative nature of hospital engagement going forward. Focus value for the consumer/patient Program design uses a scorecard, more holistic measurement categories, standardized measures, collaborative approach to improve care outcomes and aligns reimbursement increase to quality Measurement approach more structured, transparent and comprehensive (absolute and relative to peers) Hospital engagement ongoing, consultative, promotes peer-to-peer learning and knowledge sharing - Page 3 -

Program Design Highlights 1. Aligns with the IHI s (Institute for Healthcare Improvement) Triple Aim initiative, which pursues health system performance improvement along 3 dimensions of: improving the patient experience (including quality and satisfaction), improving health outcomes, and reducing the cost of care. 2. Developed and implemented in collaboration with the NC hospital community: Guided by a Hospital Quality Advisory Group comprised of select hospital CMOs and hospital executives of Quality and Medical Affairs Input and cooperation from the NC Quality Center and various individual NC hospitals 3. Introduces an updated Quality scorecard using a standard set of quality measures in an easy to understand format to be utilized in a consistent manner across hospitals. 4. Quality measurement categories: A. Leadership commitment to quality B. Improve health outcomes C. Lower costs D. Improve patient experience 5. Encourages hospitals to: Improve or sustain high performance Year-over-Year Achieve performance relative to peers Share knowledge with peers - Page 4 -

2014 Hospital Quality Program Measures A. Leadership Commitment to Quality 1. Board or Executive-level Accountability for Quality: Examples of quality programs: NCHA Just Culture or other Clinical Collaboratives IHI Getting Boards on Board AHA Center for Governance Quality ACS-NSQIP AHRQ Patient Safety Culture 2. Commitment to Patient-Centered Care: (if applicable) PCMH/PCSP designation application PCMH/PCSP designation achievement C. Lower Costs 1. All Cause 30-Day Unplanned Readmission Rate 2. All Cause 30-Day Observation Unit Readmission Rate (for information only) B. Improve Health Outcomes 1. Outcome Measures 30-day risk-standardized mortality rates Pneumonia Acute Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure AHRQ Patient Safety Indicators Death among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications (PSI 04) 2. Obstetrics Outcome Measures: Primary C-section Rate (for information only) Elective Delivery Prior to 39 Wks Rate 3. Infection Prevention Measures: CLABSI Rate CAUTI Rate SSI for Abdominal Hysterectomy Rate SSI for Colon Surgery Rate 4. Outpatient Measures: Select HEDIS Measures D. Improve Patient Experience HCAHPS Measures: Ten HCAHPS measures displayed on Hospital Compare - Page 5 -

Objective of Evaluating and Scoring Quality Objective: The objective of measuring and scoring hospital quality data is to help hospitals improve care quality by obtaining insight into performance and sharing information back with the individual hospital. - Page 6 -

Approach to Evaluating and Scoring Quality Data Collection Data Analysis Data Scoring Data Reporting Hospital quality results for the measurement period are collected and compiled. When possible results for each quality measure are analyzed at two levels 1. Improving or sustaining performance over time, which includes achieving quality goals set at the beginning of the performance period. 2. Monitoring performance relative to peers (such as statewide averages or peer percentile performance) Results on each quality measure are assigned a score. Scoring is done based on absolute level of performance Scores on the quality measures are aggregated at the four category levels in the scorecard Leadership Commitment to Quality, Improve Outcomes, Lower Costs, and Improve Patient Experience. Pre-determined weights are applied to each Category Score to determine a Weighted Category score. Hospitals receive their data in an easy to understand format on a regular basis. BCBSNC to discuss the quality results and next steps with the HQP enrolled hospital. Four Weighted Category scores are summed up to determine an overall quality score for the individual hospital for the measurement period. - Page 7 -

Overall Scoring Notes: Notable items: 1. Quality measures earn a score based on absolute performance. Relative performance to peers may be provided for information only. The scores earned on the quality measures sum up to a Quality Category Score. 2. Each Quality Category can earn up to 100 Points. Each of the 4 Quality Categories are assigned a weight as follows: A. Leadership commitment to quality 10% weight B. Improve health outcomes 60% C. Lower costs 20% D. Improve patient experience 10% 3. The Total Hospital Quality Score is a sum of the 4 Weighted Quality Category Scores. 4. A subset of quality measures are designated for information sharing only (by BCBSNC to hospitals or vice-versa) i.e. these measures will not be used for performance evaluation. 5. If a certain quality measure is not applicable to the hospital, the points for that particular measure will be redistributed to other quality measures within the same category. - Page 8 -

A. Leadership Commitment to Quality Description: Hospital quality measurement category that demonstrates the commitment of hospital leadership to quality. Commitment to quality is demonstrated by active engagement in quality improvement, supporting and/or dedicating resources to national, state, local quality collaboratives and learning networks. Requirement: 1. Board/Executive-level commitment to quality Hospitals must demonstrate leadership commitment. To quality. Commitment may be demonstrated by participating in at least one external quality program. Examples of programs: NCQC Clinical Collaboratives or Learning Networks, e.g. Just Culture IHI Getting Boards on Board AHA Center for Governance Quality ACS-NSQIP AHRQ Patient Safety Culture 2. Commitment to Patient-Centered Care Hospitals that own primary and specialty care clinics must participate in the Commitment to Patient-Centered Care program. Scoring Menu: Category earns a maximum of 100 Points. Scorecard Weight Allocation 10%. Points Distribution 1. Board/Executive-level accountability for quality 50 Points A. Leadership External Program Participation 50 Points 2. Commitment to Patient-Centered Care (if applicable) 50 Points A. PCMH/PCSP Designation Application Submission 25 Points B. PCMH/PCSP Designation Achievement 25 Points - Page 9 -

A. Leadership Commitment > 1. Leadership Program 1. Board/Executive-level Accountability A. External Program Participation (any 1): 50 Points Program Examples: Participation in NCHA Just Culture creating a culture of safety through governance/leadership. More information at http://www.ncqualitycenter.org/engageproviders/collaboratives-learning-networks/north-carolina-2012-just-culture/ Institute for Healthcare Improvement s Getting Boards on Board program. More information at http://www.ihi.org/knowledge/pages/tools/howtoguidegovernanceleadership.aspx American Hospital Association s Center for Governance Quality Curriculum for Trustees. More information at http://www.americangovernance.com/education/qualitycurriculum/index.shtml Participation in a NCHA Clinical Collaborative or Learning Network. More information at http://www.ncqualitycenter.org/engage-providers/collaboratives-learning-networks Other notable and recognized quality leadership programs (needs prior-approval) - Page 10 -

A. Leadership Commitment Participation Guidelines External Program Participation Guidelines: What constitutes active participation? 1. Written notification for participation in the select program (email). 2. Fulfill the program enrollment, participation and curriculum requirements in spirit. Representative activities may include: Attend program webinars, conferences, work sessions, etc. Complete assignments, other curriculum deliverables. Apply learning to set up a clinical program, or develop an action plan to, (as may be the case) at your hospital and provide a statement of compliance to program coordinator. Collect, validate and submit relevant data to NCQC or other entity (e.g. CDC, NSQIP, etc) as required by the program. Engage in performance improvement activity, e.g. meet regularly with quality staff and department heads to share learnings and best practices; review reports and address any issues, participate in program benchmarking, develop and implement the improvement plan, etc. Present quality program activity/results to hospital leadership, internal/external forums, etc. - Page 11 -

A. Leadership Commitment > 2. Patient-Centered Care 2. Commitment to Patient-Centered Care: 50 Points Description: A. Apply for PCMH/PCSP Designation 25 pts B. Achieve PCMH/PCSP Designation 25 pts Incent and reward health systems that own practices to apply for PCMH or PCSP designation. Incent and reward health systems that own practices to achieve PCMH or PCSP designation. Criteria: Requirement: Measurement: Apply for PCMH/PCSP designation for a set number of practices for the performance time period. Applicable hospitals to determine the number of practices planning to submit applications for the period Hospital to self report the application submission and provide a copy of NCQA or JCAHO submission confirmation for each practice Utilize available resources, e.g. http://www.ahecqualitysource.com/ Maximum 25 points Points awarded for PCMH/PCSP application submission for the set number of practices for the performance time period. Achieve PCMH/PCSP designation for a set number of practices for the performance time period. Applicable hospitals to self report the PCMH designation and provide a copy of the NCQA or JCAHO confirmation for each practice Utilize available resources, e.g. http://www.ahecqualitysource.com/ Maximum 25 points Points awarded for PCMH/PCSP designation for the set number of practices for the performance time period. For entities that have a mix of practices applying for and achieving designation, a total maximum of 50 points will be available - Page 12 -

B. Improve Health Outcomes Description: Requirement: Measures Menu: Hospital quality measurement category with a focus on improving care outcomes. Commitment to quality is demonstrated by the reporting of outcome data, sharing of knowledge/best practices, and implementing performance improvements. Hospitals must report outcome measures under the following: 1. Care Outcomes 2. Obstetrics Outcomes 3. Infection Prevention Outcomes 4. Outpatient Measures: Select HEDIS Measures (if applicable) Category earns a maximum of 100 Points Allocated a 60% weight on the performance scorecard Point distribution - 1. Care Outcome Measures: 20 Points A. Pneumonia 30-day risk-standardized mortality rate B. Acute Myocardial Infarction 30-day risk-standardized mortality rate C. Heart Failure 30-day risk-standardized mortality rate D. Mortality of surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications (AHRQ PSI-04) 2. Obstetrics: 20 Points A. Rate of Primary C-Sections (for information only) B. Rate of Elective Delivery prior to 39 Weeks 3. Infection Prevention: 30 Points A. Rate of CLABSI B. Rate of CAUTI C. Rate of SSI for Abdominal Hysterectomy D. Rate of SSI for Colon Surgery 4. Outpatient (if applicable): 30 Points A. Select HEDIS Measures - Page 13 -

B. Improve Health Outcomes > 1. Care Outcomes 1. Care Outcome Measures: (20 Points) A. Pneumonia 30 Day Risk-Standardized Mortality Rate 5 points Description: Calculation: Requirement: Measurement: 30-Day Risk Adjusted Mortality Rate for Pneumonia This measure estimates a hospital-level, risk-standardized mortality rate (RSMR), defined as death from any cause within 30 days after the index admission date, for patients discharged from the hospital with a principal diagnosis of pneumonia. This is a CMS only measure. Numerator: ratio of the number of "predicted" deaths to the number of "expected" deaths, multiplied by the national unadjusted mortality rate. The "numerator" of the ratio component is the number of deaths within 30 days predicted on the basis of the hospital's performance with its observed case mix. Denominator: Number of admissions with a principal discharge diagnosis of pneumonia. For exclusions and details refer to CMS Hospital Compare. Measure is evaluated for performance CMS only measure. Data source: CMS Hospital Compare http://www.medicare.gov/hospitalcompare/search.html or selfreported by hospital if hospital chooses Maximum 5 points Points based on CMS Hospital Compare data at time of evaluation: 0 points: Hospital s rate = Worse than US National Rate 3 points: Hospital s rate = No different than the US National Rate 5 points: Hospital s rate = Better than the US National Rate NA: Hospital did not have enough cases to reliably tell how well they are performing (Points will be equally redistributed to other measures in this category) - Page 14 -

B. Improve Health Outcomes > 1. Care Outcomes 1. Care Outcome Measures: (20 Points) Description: Calculation: Requirement: Measurement: B. Acute Myocardial Infarction 30-Day Risk-Standardized Mortality Rate 5 points Mortality Rate 5 points 30-Day Risk Adjusted Mortality Rate for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) This measure estimates a hospitallevel, risk-standardized mortality rate (RSMR), defined as death from any cause within 30 days after the index admission date, for patients discharged from the hospital with a principal diagnosis of AMI. This is a CMS only measure. Numerator: ratio of the number of "predicted" deaths to the number of "expected" deaths, multiplied by the national unadjusted mortality rate. The "numerator" of the ratio component is the number of deaths within 30 days predicted on the basis of the hospital's performance with its observed case mix. Denominator: Number of admissions with a principal discharge diagnosis of AMI. For exclusions and details refer to CMS Hospital Compare. Measure is evaluated for performance CMS only measure. Data source: CMS Hospital Compare http://www.medicare.gov/hospitalcompare/search.html or selfreported by hospital if hospital chooses. Maximum 5 points Points based on CMS Hospital Compare data at time of evaluation: 0 points: Hospital s rate = Worse than US National Rate 3 points: Hospital s rate = No different than the US National Rate 5 points: Hospital s rate = Better than the US National Rate NA: Hospital did not have enough cases to reliably tell how well they are performing (Points will be equally redistributed to other measures in this category) - Page 15 -

B. Improve Health Outcomes > 1. Care Outcomes 1. Care Outcome Measures: (20 Points) Description: Calculation: Requirement: Measurement: C. Heart Failure 30-Day Risk-Standardized Mortality Rate 5 points Mortality Rate 5 points 30-Day Risk Adjusted Mortality Rate for heart failure (HF) This measure estimates a hospital-level, riskstandardized mortality rate (RSMR), defined as death from any cause within 30 days after the index admission date, for patients discharged from the hospital with a principal diagnosis of HF. This is a CMS only measure. Numerator: Number of deaths among cases meeting the inclusion and exclusion rules for the denominator. Denominator: All discharges, age 18 years and older, with a principal diagnosis code of heart failure (HF). For exclusions and details refer to CMS Hospital Compare. Measure is evaluated for performance CMS only measure. Data source: CMS Hospital Compare http://www.medicare.gov/hospitalcompare/search.html or selfreported by hospital if hospital chooses. Maximum 5 points Points based on CMS Hospital Compare data at time of evaluation: 0 points: Hospital s rate = Worse than US National Rate 3 points: Hospital s rate = No different than the US National Rate 5 points: Hospital s rate = Better than the US National Rate NA: Hospital did not have enough cases to reliably tell how well they are performing (Points will be equally redistributed to other measures in this category) - Page 16 -

B. Improve Health Outcomes > 1. Care Outcomes 1. Care Outcome Measures: (20 Points) Description: D. Mortality of Surgical Inpatients with Serious Treatable Complications (PSI 04) 5 Points 5 points Mortality of Surgical Inpatients with Serious Treatable Complications - This measure estimates a hospital-level mortality rate per 1,000 surgical discharges, among patients ages 18 through 89 years of age or obstetric patients Mortality with Rate serious 5 treatable points complications. The measures are risk adjusted to account for differences in hospital patients characteristics. Calculation: Requirement: Measurement: Numerator: Number of deaths among cases meeting the inclusion and exclusion rules for the denominator. Denominator: or MDC 14 (pregnancy, childbirth, and puerperium) defined by specific DRGs or MS-DRGs and an ICD-9-CM code for an operating room procedure, principal procedure within 2 days of admission or admission type of elective (ATYPE=3) with potential complications of care listed in Death among Surgical definition (e.g., pneumonia, DVT/PE, sepsis, shock/cardiac arrest, or GI hemorrhage/acute ulcer). For exclusions and details refer to CMS Hospital Compare. Measure is evaluated for performance CMS only measure. Data source: CMS Hospital Compare http://www.medicare.gov/hospitalcompare/search.html or selfreported by hospital if hospital chooses. Maximum 5 points Points based on CMS Hospital Compare data at time of evaluation: 0 points: Hospital s rate = Worse than US National Rate 3 points: Hospital s rate = No different than the US National Rate 5 points: Hospital s rate = Better than the US National Rate NA: Hospital did not have enough cases to reliably tell how well they are performing (Points will be equally redistributed to other measures in this category) - Page 17 -

B. Improve Health Outcomes > 2. Obstetrics (OB) 2. Obstetrics Outcomes: (20 Points) A. Rate of Primary C-Sections B. Rate of Elective Delivery prior to 39Wk Description: Calculation: Requirement: Measurement: Low risk Primary C-section rates the measure assesses the number of nulliparous women with a term, singleton baby in a vertex position delivered by cesarean section (NQF 471) Numerator: Patients with cesarean sections with ICD- 9-CM Principal Procedure Code or ICD-9-CM Other Procedure Codes for cesarean section. Denominator: Nulliparous patients delivered of a live term singleton newborn in vertex presentation. Applies to hospitals with OB service For information only; not evaluated BCBSNC to report measure to Hospital All Payer data Information only This measure assesses patients with elective vaginal deliveries or elective cesarean sections at >= 37 and < 39 weeks of gestation completed (NQF 469) Numerator: Patients with elective deliveries with ICD-9- CM Principal Procedure Code or codes for a) medical induction of labor, and/or b) cesarean section while not in active labor or experiencing spontaneous rupture of membranes. Denominator: Patients delivering newborns with >= 37 and < 39 weeks of gestation completed. Measure is evaluated for performance Hospital to self-report to BCBSNC BCBSNC patients only Maximum 20 points Results to Plan: 0 points: If rate equal or greater than 10% 10 points: If rate is between 0 and 10% 20 points: If rate = 0 - Page 18 -

B. Improve Health Outcomes > 3. Infection Prevention 3. Infection Prevention: (30 Points) Description: Calculation: Requirement: A. Rate of CLABSI 8 points B. Rate of CAUTI 8 points Measures the healthcare associated infection incidence in the form of the Rate of Device-associated Infections in the hospital ICU setting only (to be expanded to the hospital-wide setting in the future). ICU aggregate rates as reported to CDC NHSN. Measures include: Central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) Catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) Aggregate rates as reported as Infection / Device Days X 1000. Measure is evaluated for performance Same as CLABSI CMS data only. Data source: CMS Hospital Compare http://www.medicare.gov/hospitalcompare/search.ht ml Aggregate rates as reported as Infection / Device Days X 1000. Measurement: Maximum 8 points each for CLABSI and CAUTI infection incidence rates Points based on CMS Hospital Compare data at time of evaluation: 0 points: Hospital rate = Worse than U.S. National Benchmark 4 points: Hospital rate = No different than U.S. National Benchmark 8 points: Hospital rate = Better than the U.S. National Benchmark NA: A comparison to similarly-sized hospitals was not conducted (Points will be equally redistributed to other measures in this category) - Page 19 -

B. Improve Health Outcomes > 3. Infection Prevention 3. Infection Prevention: (30 Points) Description: Calculation: C. SSI Rate Abd. Hysterectomy 7 points D. SSI Rate Colon Surgery 7 points Rate of surgical site infections reported by the NC DHHS and CDC NHSN. Infection symptoms include: redness and pain around the area of surgery, drainage of cloudy fluid from the surgical wound, and fever. Covered procedures include: Abdominal Hysterectomy Colon Surgery Numerator: Patients who have had the surgical procedure followed by infection in the part of the body where the surgery took place. Denominator: All patients with the surgical procedure code. Requirement: Measure is evaluated for performance All Payer data Data source: CMS Hospital Compare http://www.medicare.gov/hospitalcompare/search.html or self-reported by hospital if hospital chooses Same as SSI Abdominal Hysterectomy Measurement: Maximum 8 points each for Hysterectomy and Colon Surgery SSI infection rates Points based on CMS Hospital Compare data at time of evaluation: 0 points: Hospital rate = lower than similarly-sized hospitals 4 points: Hospital rate = No different than similarly-sized hospitals 8 points: Hospital rate = higher than similarly-sized hospitals NA: A comparison to similarly-sized hospitals was not conducted (Points will be equally redistributed to other measures in this category) - Page 20 -

B. Improve Health Outcomes > 4. Outpatient 4. Outpatient Measures (If Applicable) : Select HEDIS measures (30 Points) Description: A. Select 5 HEDIS Measures - 6 points each, Total of 30 points possible 5 points The Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) is a widely used set of performance measures developed and maintained by the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA). By focusing on key Mortality Rate 5 points dimensions of care and service, HEDIS assists providers in streamlining comprehensive, quality care that generates better health outcomes. Requirement: Measurement: Required for Hospitals that own Primary Care clinics (as applicable) Identify the Primary Care Clinics for performance evaluation (Select approximately 25% of the practices in your network) Identify the 5 HEDIS measures for performance evaluation (The 5 HEDIS measures will be applicable to all selected Primary care clinics) Hospitals self-report HEDIS results along with supporting patient documentation using the approved scorecard and database format Maximum 6 points per HEDIS measure based on performance results** 6 points: HEDIS measure performance = 90th percentile or greater 4 points: HEDIS measure performance = 75th percentile or greater 2 points: HEDIS measure performance = 50th percentile or greater 0 points: HEDIS measure performance = less than 50th percentile *See Appendix for the menu of HEDIS measures and format for reporting HEDIS results ** HEDIS measure results evaluated using NCQA Quality Compass tool for the South Atlantic Region - Page 21 -

C. Lower Cost Description: Hospital quality measurement category with a focus on lowering the cost of care to the customer. The lowering of cost initiative aligns with the IHI objective of reducing the per-capita cost of health care and BCBSNC s desire to enhance the value of the healthcare dollar for the paying customer (individuals and groups). Requirement: Data Source - BCBSNC Claims data (Exclusions: Federal, Medicare, Blue Card Host and all ancillary products) Readmission Rate will be evaluated for performance; Observation Unit Readmission will be monitored but not used in the evaluation (information only) Category earns a maximum of 100 Points; Allocated a 20% weight on the performance scorecard Measures Menu: A. All Cause 30-Day Unplanned Readmission Rate (100 Points) B. All Cause 30-Day Unplanned Readmission to Observation Unit (0 Points information only) - Page 22 -

C. Lower Cost 1. Readmission Management: (100 Points) Description: A. Unplan. Readmission Rate 100 points B. Obs. Unit Readmission Rate 0 points All Cause 30-Day Unplanned Readmission Rate. Measure is used to assess the number of acute inpatient stays during the measurement period that were followed by an acute unplanned readmission for any diagnosis within 30 days. This measure assesses the number of Observation Unit stays during the measurement period that were preceded by an acute inpatient discharge for any diagnosis within 30 days Calculation: Numerator: Count of 30-Day Readmissions Denominator: Count of Index hospital stays Numerator: Count of Observation Unit Stays with previous inpatient admission within past 30 days. Denominator: Count of Index Hospital Stays. Requirement: Measure is evaluated for performance BCBSNC only member data excluding: Federal, Medicare, Blue Card Host and all ancillary products Source: BCBSNC claims data Measure is for information only BCBSNC only member data Source: BCBSNC claims data Measurement: Maximum 100 points Results to Plan (100 points): 0 point: met less than 50% of target 40 points: equal or >50% but <90% of target 80 points: equal or > 90% but <100% of target 100 points: 100% of target For information only; not evaluated for performance - Page 23 -

D. Improve Patient Experience Description: Hospital quality category with a focus on improving the inpatient experience of care as determined by select CMS HCAHPS measures. Requirement: All measures are mandatory; all measures will be evaluated for performance Date source: CMS Hospital Compare http://www.medicare.gov/hospitalcompare/search.html CMS data only Note - Category earns a maximum of 100 Points; Allocated a 10% weight on the performance scorecard Measures Menu: HCAHPS Measures: 100 Points All ten HCAHPS measures displayed on Hospital Compare (10 points each) - Page 24 -

D. Improve Patient Experience > 1. Select HCAHPS Measures 1. HCAHPS Survey Results: (100 Points) Description: Calculation: Requirement: All ten HCAHPS Measures - 10 Points each The HCAHPS survey is designed to produce comparable data on the patient's perspective on care that allows objective and meaningful comparisons between hospitals on domains that are important to consumers. The public reporting of the survey results is designed to create incentives for hospitals to improve their quality of care. Determined by CMS. Measures will be evaluated for performance CMS data only Source: CMS Hospital Compare or self reported by hospital http://www.medicare.gov/hospitalcompare/search.html Measurement: Maximum 10 points each Results to Plan: 10 Points: IF score improvement of 5% or more (relative to the prior period) OR if the score is 5% or higher than the NC average 5 points: IF improvement is less than 5% OR if the score is at or above the NC average. 0 Points: IF no improvement OR the score is below the NC average. - Page 25 -

APPENDIX HOSPITAL QUALITY PROGRAM EVALUATION & SCORING METHODOLOGY - Page 26 -

HEDIS Menu of Measures: HEDIS Measure Abbreviation HEDIS Measure Description 1. Appropriate Testing for Children with Pharyngitis 2. Appropriate Treatment for Children with URI CWP URI The % of children 2 18 years of age who were diagnosed with pharyngitis, dispensed an antibiotic and received a group A streptococcus (strep) test for the episode. A higher rate represents better performance (i.e., appropriate testing). The % of children 3 months 18 years of age who were given a diagnosis of upper respiratory infection (URI) and were not dispensed an antibiotic prescription 3. Follow-Up Children Prescribed ADHD Medication Maintenance Phase ADD2 The percentage of children newly prescribed attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medication who had at least three follow-up care visits within a 10-month period, one of which was within 30 days of when the first ADHD medication was dispensed. Two rates are reported (Initiation Phase & Continuation & Maintenance). Continuation and Maintenance (C&M) Phase. The percentage of members 6 12 years of age as of the IPSD with an ambulatory prescription dispensed for ADHD medication, who remained on the medication for at least 210 days and who, in addition to the visit in the Initiation Phase, had at least two follow-up visits with a practitioner within 270 days (9 months) after the Initiation Phase ended. 4. Persistence of Beta Blocker Treatment After a Heart Attack 5. Cholesterol-LDL-C Screening for Patients with Cardiovascular Conditions PBH CMC1 The % of members 18 years of age and older during the measurement year who were hospitalized and discharged alive from July 1 of the year prior to the measurement year to June 30 of the measurement year with a diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and who received persistent beta-blocker treatment for six months after discharge The % of members 18 75 years of age who were discharged alive for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), (CABG) or (PTCA) from January 1 November 1 of the year prior to the measurement year, or who had a diagnosis of ischemic vascular disease (IVD) during the measurement year and the year prior to measurement year, who had an LDL-C screening during the measurement year. 6. Childhood Immunizations (Combination 2) CIS2 The % of children two years of age who had four diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis (DTaP), three polio (IPV), one measles, mumps and rubella (MMR), two H influenza type B (Hib), three hepatitis B, one chicken pox (VZV) vaccines by their second birthday. - Page 27 -

HEDIS Menu of Measures: HEDIS Measure Abbreviation HEDIS Measure Description 7. Pharmacotherapy Management of COPD Exacerbation-- Bronchodilator Total 8. Use of Spirometry Testing in the Assessment and Diagnosis of COPD PCE1 SPR The % of COPD exacerbations for members 40 and older who had an acute IP discharge or ED visit on or between 1/1-11/30 of the measurement year and who were dispensed a bronchodilator within 30 days of the event. Note: The eligible population for this measure is based on acute inpatient discharges and ED visits, not on members. It is possible for the denominator to include multiple events for the same individual. The % of members 40 years of age and older with a new diagnosis or newly active chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who received appropriate spirometry testing to confirm the diagnosis. 9. Diabetes Care - HbA1c Testing CDC1 The percentage of members 18 75 years of age with diabetes (type 1 and type 2) who had Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) testing 10. Diabetes Care Poor HbA1c Control CDC2 The % of members 18 75 years of age with diabetes (type 1 and type 2) who. HbA1c poor control (>9.0%) 11. Diabetes Care - LDL-C Screening 12. Diabetes Care - Nephropathy Monitoring CDC 5 CDC 8 The % of members 18 75 years of age with diabetes (type 1 and type 2) who Eye exam (retinal) performed The % of members 18 75 years of age with diabetes (type 1 and type 2) who had Medical attention for nephropathy 13. Diabetes Care - Eye Exams CDC 5 The % of members 18 75 years of age with diabetes (type 1 and type 2) who Eye exam (retinal) performed 14. Controlling High Blood Pressure CBP The % of members 18 85 years of age who had a diagnosis of hypertension (HTN) and whose blood pressure (BP) was adequately controlled (<140/90) during the measurement year. Use the Hybrid Method for this measure. - Page 28 -

HEDIS Reporting Template Health System/Hospital Information Name: NPI: Address: Primary Care Practice Information Name: NPI: Address: Performance Period: Year 1: Year 2: Outpatient HEDIS Performance Measures - Hospital Self Reported 1 HEDIS Abbrev. Measure Name Measure Description Year End Results # patients receiving services ** # eligible patients*** HQP Points Year End Results # patients receiving services** Year 1 Year 2 # eligible patients*** HQP Points 2 3 4 5 Total HQP Points Total HQP Points **Hospital/Health System attests to the accuracy of the information and submits completed member data base provided in Appendix A ***All Lines of BCBSNC business. Minimum of 30 eligible patients required for each chosen HEDIS measure - Page 29 -

Appendix A Please complete the following template for patients you are reporting on the Hospital Quality Program - HEDIS Measure worksheet. You may also submit the data elements below as a reportable extract from your electronic health record system Subscriber ID Number First Name Last Name DOB Member Address Servicing Provider Name Servicing Provider NPI Date of Service Measure - Page 30 -