Offenders on Indeterminate Sentences

Similar documents
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Amendment (Provisional Sentencing for Children) Act 2013 No 7

Sentencing Snapshot. Introduction. People sentenced. Causing serious injury recklessly

A public protection order is a court order that will allow the detention of very high risk individuals at a secure facility within prison precincts.

Public perceptions of crime and the criminal justice system survey 2014 results

Sentencing outcomes for trafficking drugs in the Magistrates Court of Victoria

Defendants charged with serious violent and sexual offences (including murder)

Men and Women. and the. Criminal Justice System

Drug Court Legislation Amendment Act 2014 No 45

Criminal Justice Statistics Quarterly Update to March 2013

2009 Florida Prison Recidivism Study Releases From 2001 to 2008

STATES OF JERSEY. DRAFT CRIMINAL JUSTICE (YOUNG OFFENDERS) (No. 2) (JERSEY) LAW 201-

Historical Data. Historical Data 33

Have New South Wales criminal courts become more lenient in the past 20 years?

Standing Committee on Justice, Human Rights, Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness. Ottawa, November 24, Speaking Notes

HANDOUT 1: Purpose and Principles of Sentencing in Canada

Overview of Federal Criminal Cases

The Start of a Criminal Career: Does the Type of Debut Offence Predict Future Offending? Research Report 77. Natalie Owen & Christine Cooper

Employment Manual REHABILITATION OF OFFENDERS AND SELF DISCLOSURE POLICY

CAYMAN ISLANDS. Supplement No. 9 published with Extraordinary Gazette No. 53 of 17th July, DRUG REHABILITATION COURT LAW.

State of New York DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION

Lifetime Likelihood of Going to State or Federal Prison

Title 17-A: MAINE CRIMINAL CODE

Development of Forensic Nursing in Australia: Associate Professor Linda Saunders 4 th December 2008

In 2013, U.S. residents age 12 or older experienced

S G C Sentencing Guidelines Council New Sentences: Criminal Justice Act 2003 Guideline

2010 CRIMINAL CODE SENTENCING PROVISIONS. Effective July 29, 2010

Information for completing: Form D: Application for transfer to Australia prisoner not on parole and not serving suspended sentence

Statistics on Women and the Criminal Justice System A Ministry of Justice publication under Section 95 of the Criminal Justice Act 1991

CRIMINAL CODE REVISION BILL H.B. 1006, 2013

DRIVER LICENCE DISQUALIFICATION REFORM

Literature review: UK veterans and the criminal justice system

Amendments to the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders (LASPO) Bill Equality Impact Assessment

Model Spent Convictions Bill - Consultation paper

Proven Re-offending Statistics Quarterly Bulletin July 2010 to June 2011, England and Wales

Overall, 67.8% of the 404,638 state

GUIDELINES TO THE RELEVANCE OF CONVICTIONS FOR HACKNEY CARRIAGE / PRIVATE HIRE DRIVER LICENCE APPLICANTS

National Objectives for Social Work Services in the Criminal Justice System: Standards - Throughcare

Speaker Sheldon Silver. Breaking New York s Addiction to Prison: Reforming New York s Rockefeller Drug Laws

LUTON BOROUGH COUNCIL. Taxi and Private Hire Licensing. Convictions and Fitness Policy

Alternative Sentencing in the Federal Criminal Justice System

Compulsory Drug Treatment Correctional Centre Act 2004 No 42

Offender Rehabilitation Act 2014

Adult Plea Negotiation Guidelines

Increasing the Magistrates Court fine limit Equality Impact Assessment

Crimes (Serious Sex Offenders) Act 2006 No 7

PROPOSAL. Expansion of Drug Treatment Diversion Programs. December 18, 2007

Who benefits from the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act and how?

Rehabilitation of Offenders Act. Page 1 of 13 Rehabilitation of Offenders Act version 2.0 Valid from 9 December 2013

Colorado Legislative Council Staff

Queensland CORRECTIVE SERVICES AMENDMENT ACT 2003

A Decade of Truth-In- Sentencing in Virginia

Consequences of Convictions for Sex Crimes

Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008

How To Save Money On Drug Sentencing In Michigan

The Code. for Crown Prosecutors

California s Criminal Justice System. A Primer

COMPARISON OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE STATISTICS

FINAL BILL REPORT HB 1544

2012 Party Platforms On Criminal Justice Policy

BERMUDA REHABILITATION OF OFFENDERS ACT : 6

Sexual Offences Definitive Guideline DEFINITIVE GUIDELINE

Questionnaire on principles of public prosecution as regards juvenile justice for Consultative Council of European Prosecutors (CCPE)

A. APPLICABILITY OF GUIDELINE

Security Classification Using the Custody Rating Scale

Peering Into the Black Box: The Criminal Justice System s Response to Gun- Related Felonies in St. Louis. Richard Rosenfeld Joshua Williams

REPORT TO CRIME & DISORDER OVERVIEW & SCRUTINY PANEL. Title: OVERVIEW OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM. Date: 27 th October 2009

REHABILITATION OF OFFENDERS (Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act 2011) GUIDANCE NOTE

Sentencing for Impaired Driving

Domestic Violence Offenders in Missouri

PUBLIC OPINION ON THE MANDATORY DEATH PENALTY IN TRINIDAD A SUMMARY OF THE MAIN FINDINGS OF A SURVEY. Roger Hood and Florence Seemungal

Proposition 5. Nonviolent Offenders. Sentencing, Parole and Rehabilitation. Statute.

Chapter 938 of the Wisconsin statutes is entitled the Juvenile Justice Code.

Crime Rates and Youth Incarceration in Texas and California Compared: Public Safety or Public Waste?

CRIMINAL JUSTICE (COMPENSATION ORDERS) (JERSEY) LAW 1994

CHAPTER 93. BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey: 1. N.J.S.2C:35-14 is amended to read as follows:

Burglary Offences Definitive Guideline DEFINITIVE GUIDELINE

Queensland DRUG REHABILITATION (COURT DIVERSION) ACT 2000

ENHANCEMENTS IN CALIFORNIA CRIMINAL LAW: Making sense of tacking on more time.

The Criminal Justice Diversion Program in Victoria

Indecent photographs of children

Alcohol and Re-offending Who Cares?

Women, Punishment and Human Rights

PARTICIPANTS PAPERS THE MALDIVES CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM AN ALTERNATIVE METHOD FOR PUNISHMENT. Haleem Mohamed*

THE CIVIL RIGHTS RESTORATION PROCESS

TITLE 6: CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE DIVISION 1: CRIMES AGAINST THE PERSON

Practioner Guide to HB 585. Mississippi Corrections and Criminal Justice Task Force

Safer Streets Crime Action Plan Youth Justice. Have Your Say

Information Bulletin AN INCREASING INDIGENOUS POPULATION? IMPLICATIONS FOR THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM. Justine Doherty

THIS GUIDANCE APPLIES FROM 10 MARCH 2014

The Criminal Procedure Rules October 2015 PART 9 ALLOCATION AND SENDING FOR TRIAL

Transcription:

Offenders on Indeterminate Sentences Introduction Prisoners serving sentences of Life Imprisonment and Preventive Detention form a distinct sub-set of the prisoner population. The following pages provide information about recent trends involving these offenders. As will become apparent, numbers of prisoners serving indeterminate sentences have been growing steadily for several decades. It is hoped that this analysis will improve understanding of this sub-group, and potentially stimulate improvements in the management of such offenders, both while in prison, and after their eventual release. Life sentences and Preventive Detention Life Imprisonment and Preventive Detention are described as indeterminate sentences because, when imposed by a sentencing judge, no fixed expiry date applies. Instead, a minimum non-parole period is specified, constituting the length of time that the offender must remain in prison before parole can be considered. However, as the following analysis will show, prisoners subject to indeterminate sentences can serve many years beyond the non-parole date before eventual release. Once released, indeterminately sentenced offenders are subject to recall to prison at any time, and may as a result of recall spend many more years in custody. Prior to implementation of the Sentencing Act 2002 and the Parole Act 2002, most offenders sentenced to Life Imprisonment were subject to minimum non parole periods of 10 years. Offenders sentenced to Preventive Detention were subject to minimum non parole periods of 7 years. The 2002 legislation specified that the minimum non-parole period for life imprisonment should remain at 10 years, with periods longer than 10 years possible in cases involving aggravating factors. For cases involving one or more serious aggravating factors, a non-parole period of at least 17 years must be imposed, unless the court was satisfied that it would be manifestly unjust to do so. Under section 89 of the Sentencing Act 2002, offenders sentenced to Preventive Detention must serve a minimum period of imprisonment of at least five years, although longer non-parole periods are also frequently imposed. Parameters of this analysis All offenders sentenced to Life Imprisonment and/or Preventive Detention since 1945 have been included in this analysis. However, it is acknowledged that official records of offenders prior to 1980 are not always complete. Where an indeterminately sentenced offender is recorded as having been released prior to 1990, and no further records relating to the person can be found (including parole orders), he or she is recorded here as discharged. Offenders In total, 1,299 1 offenders have been sentenced to an indeterminate sentence since the Department s records began. Figure 1 Indeterminate sentenced offenders by current status 1 To date there are 20 offenders who have been sentenced to both Life Imprisonment and Preventive Detention. In these cases, the offender has been counted only as a Life Imprisonment. On 31 December 2013, 776 of this number were in prison (including 4 waiting for a recall hearing), 28 had been deported, and 99 are deceased. The remaining 265 are being managed in the community on life-long parole. STATUS ALL LIFE PD In Prison, Sentenced 772 512 260 In Prison, Recall Outstanding 2 4 2 2 Community, Parole 265 242 23 Deceased 99 69 30 Discharged 3 131 86 45 Deported 28 25 3 Grand Total 1299 936 363 Figure 2 Indeterminate offenders by current status 2 Offenders who are counted as In Prison, Recall Outstanding have been released on parole, and have been recalled to prison and are awaiting a recall hearing to confirm if the NZPB will approve the recall order. 3 Under the Criminal Justice Act 1985, offenders could be discharged from life parole by the National Parole Board. This was repealed with the introduction of the Parole Act 2002 S29(3). 1 Offenders on Indeterminate sentences

Snapshot of indeterminate offenders in prison Although typically fewer than 50 offenders start indeterminate sentences each year, they remain in prison for lengthy periods and are becoming an increasingly significant subset of the prisoner population. Indeterminate offenders now make up 11 percent of the sentenced population. In 1990, 85 percent of indeterminate sentenced offenders in prison were serving Life sentences. Since then, this proportion has reduced significantly, to 66 percent, with a greater proportion now on Preventive Detention. Figure 3 Number of indeterminate sentenced offenders in prison New indeterminate sentence starts Figure 4 Number of new indeterminate sentence starts each calendar year Approximately twice as many offenders are sentenced to Life Imprisonment than receive Preventive Detention. Unusually, in 2004 the number of starts on Preventive Detention was more than the number of Life Imprisonment starts. Since 1985 the number of offenders sentenced to an indeterminate sentence has generally been increasing. Spikes in the number of offenders sentenced to Life Imprisonment appear to have occurred in each of the last three decades. For example, against an average of around 25 Life sentence starts per year, in 2010, 48 offenders were sentenced to Life Imprisonment. Age at sentencing Two thirds of offenders sentenced to Life Imprisonment were between 20 and 39 years old when their sentence started. The remaining third can roughly be halved into two equal age groups, under 20 and 40 and over. Figure 5 Indeterminate sentenced offenders by age at sentencing Figure 5 shows the proportion of indeterminate offenders according to the age at which they were first sentenced to the indeterminate sentence. More younger offenders are sentenced to Life Imprisonment than those sentenced to Preventive Detention. This is due to the nature of the offences associated with each sentence type (see Figure 11). The median age of offenders sentenced to Life Imprisonment is 27 years. This is significantly lower than the median age of offenders sentenced to Preventive Detention, which is 38. Figure 6 Indeterminate sentenced offenders by age group Offenders sentenced to Preventive Detention present a different profile. About half of the offenders sentenced to Preventive Detention were aged 40 years or over when they commenced the sentence. Offenders between 20 and 39 account for over half of all offenders sentenced to Preventive Detention. Only one offender under the age of 20 has been sentenced to Preventive Detention. 2 Offenders on Indeterminate sentences

Gender Figure 7 Indeterminate sentenced offenders by gender Of the 1299 offenders sentenced to an indeterminate sentence, 62 (five percent) are female. When split by sentence type a clear difference emerges. Only one female offender has ever been sentenced to Preventive Detention and, unlike the majority of male Preventive Detention offenders, the offences involved were violent rather than sexual in nature. Of all offenders sentenced to Life Imprisonment, seven percent are female. This is still below the proportion of females sentenced to imprisonment on determinate sentences (10 percent). Ethnicity The ethnicity of offenders serving indeterminate sentences is very similar proportionally for both Maori and European, around 45 percent. Pacific peoples generally account for just over 10 percent, and all other ethnicities about four percent. Maori make up the same proportion of offenders sentenced to Life Imprisonment and Preventive Detention (42 percent). A higher proportion of European offenders however are sentenced to Preventive Detention (51 percent) compared to Life Imprisonment (40 percent). Figure 8 Indeterminate sentenced offenders by ethnicity 4 4 Ethnicity of 12 percent of all indeterminate offenders is not recorded. These offenders, most of whom were sentenced prior to 1990, have been excluded from the above figures. Gangs Figure 9 Indeterminate sentenced offenders who are active gang members Twelve percent of all indeterminate sentenced offenders are gang members. Fourteen percent of all Life Imprisonment prisoners and eight percent of all Preventive Detention offenders are gang members. The finding that offenders on Life Imprisonment sentences have a higher rate of gang members than Preventive Detention sentences is to be expected for two reasons: the majority of Life Imprisonment offenders are sentenced for homicide or violent offences, as are over half of gang members. the majority of Preventive Detention offenders are sex offenders, and sex offences constitute the offences of only 10 percent of all gang members in prison. 3 Offenders on Indeterminate sentences

Offence type Life Imprisonment sentences are predominantly imposed for murder (over 99 percent), although a small number have been imposed for less serious violent offences such as manslaughter. A very small group of Life-sentenced prisoners received this penalty for drug importation or manufacturing offences. Preventive Detention sentences are mainly imposed for sexual offences, although 17 percent of offenders sentenced to Preventive Detention were sentenced for non-sexual offences. Most of these however were sentenced under old legislation that has since been repealed. Figure 10 shows the first indeterminate sentence of each sentence type and the offence type for that sentence. Figure 10 Indeterminate sentenced offenders by offence type Indeterminate sentences as proportion of all prison sentences 5 Figure 11 shows that only 0.4 percent of all prison sentences are indeterminate in length. Only one percent of imprisoned violent offenders receive an indeterminate sentence. However, the sentences of four percent of all sexual offenders who were imprisoned were Preventive Detention. 5 Only prison sentences started within the last 30 years have been included in the analysis of this rate (sentence commence date >= 01/01/1984). Figure 11 Offence type by prison sentence type Indeterminate sentenced offenders place of b irth Over 90 percent (1167) of offenders sentenced to an indeterminate sentence were born in New Zealand. Offenders born in the Pacific Islands (5 percent) are the largest group of offenders with non-new Zealand places of birth. These percentages are not dissimilar to proportions found the wider prison population. Figure 12 Number of indeterminate offenders and location of birth 6 6 Where an offender has no specified birthplace, the assumption has been made that they were born in New Zealand. Figure 13 Life offenders by birthplace 4 Offenders on Indeterminate sentences

Imposed minimum non-parole period Figure 14 shows the spread of imposed non-parole periods. Minimum non-parole periods for Life Imprisonment and Preventive Detention have changed a number of times as relevant legislation has been revised. Almost half of all Life Imprisonment sentences were imposed with 10 years non-parole periods. With sentences of Preventive Detention, 38 percent had a 10 years nonparole period, with the majority (57 percent) having minimum periods below 10 years. This difference reflects the provisions of the Sentencing Act 2002. Figure 14 Minimum non-parole periods of indeterminate sentences The mean imposed non-parole period for a Life Imprisonment sentence is 10 years 2 months, compared with 7 years 7 months for Preventive Detention. To date, the longest imposed non-parole period for a Life Imprisonment sentence is 30 years, imposed in 2003. The longest imposed non-parole period for a Preventive Detention sentence is 28 years, imposed in 1984. Seriousness Index Not surprisingly perhaps, amongst all offenders on whom an indeterminate sentence has been imposed, those released from prison and currently on parole were originally convicted of offences lower in seriousness than the offences of those who currently remain in prison (see Figure 15). This difference is particularly pronounced amongst Preventive Detainees. The seriousness of the offences for which the sentence was imposed is influential in determining longterm risks to public safety posed by any individual offender. Figure 15 Average Seriousness Index Ever released on parole Figure 16 Indeterminate sentenced offenders who have been released on parole at least once 7 Figure 16 shows the proportion of indeterminate sentenced offenders who have been released on parole (at least once), by sentence type. Of the 1299 offenders sentenced to an indeterminate sentence, 589 (45%) have been released on parole at least once. Over half (52 percent) of offenders who have been sentenced to Life Imprisonment have been given parole at least once, compared with only 28 percent of offenders sentenced to Preventive Detention. Of the 265 indeterminate sentenced offenders who are currently released on parole, only 23 (9%) were Preventive Detainees. These differences reflect the fact that a significant number of offenders sentenced to Life Imprisonment are assessed as having low risks of reoffending. However, Preventive Detention is imposed only on offenders who are assessed at the time of sentencing as having a very high risk of future offending. 7 Releases on parole here include those released by the NZ Parole Board and its predecessor, the National Parole Board. 5 Offenders on Indeterminate sentences

Time served before first release Figure 17 Average number of years served before first release, counted at year of first release The average time served by those released from a Life Imprisonment sentence has increased steadily since the early 1990s. Time served amongst those released from Preventive Detention increased significantly between 1990 and in the early 2000s, peaking at 14.4 years. Since 2010, the average number of years served before being released from Preventive Detention has decreased to just over 11 years. It should be stressed however that these figures relate only to indeterminate sentenced offenders who have been released: they do not reflect the lengths of time served by those who have passed their parole eligibility date but have not been released. Time served for those not yet released Figure 18 shows all indeterminate sentenced offenders who have passed their parole eligibility date, but have not yet been released. Most of these offenders have spent five years beyond their parole eligibility date. Preventive Detention offenders are found to have served slightly longer (2-3 months) on average since passing their parole eligibility date than have Life Imprisonment offenders. Figure 18 Number of years since Parole Eligibility Date 8 8 These figures relate only to indeterminate sentenced offenders who have passed their parole eligibility date and have not yet been released. They do not include indeterminate sentenced offenders who have been released but then recalled to prison. Recalls to prison 9 Figure 19 relates only to indeterminate offenders who have been released on parole. It reveals the proportion of these who have been recalled to prison to resume serving the indeterminate sentence at least once. Just over a quarter of indeterminate offenders who have been released have subsequently been recalled. This proportion is significantly higher for Life Imprisonment offenders than for Preventive Detention offenders. Figure 19 Indeterminate sentenced offenders who have been released on parole at least once and proportion recalled 10 10 Offenders recalled following release from an indeterminate sentence included here may or may not still be in prison. 9 Releases and recalls referred to in this document relate to decisions made by both the New Zealand Parole Board, and its predecessor, the National Parole Board 6 Offenders on Indeterminate sentences

Sub-types of indeterminately sentenced offenders Offenders sentenced to Life Imprisonment or Preventive Detention vary significantly in terms of prior offending history. A graphical representation developed by the Department the Offender Timeline depicts individual criminal histories in a simplified visual format. Each offender s timeline starts at left as the offender s date of birth, and continues until very recently (December 2013). Longer timelines represent older offenders and shorter timelines, younger. Interspersed along each timeline are markers representing elements of a unique offending history: Markers above the timeline represent individual offences; the colour of each marker depicts the nature of the offence (see Legend opposite). Slight differences in height of each marker above the line depict the seriousness score for each offence. The colour of each bar below the timeline depicts the nature of the most serious offence for which a sentence was imposed The depth of each bar below the line depicts the nature of the imposed sentence or order (see Legend). The length of each bar depicts the length of the sentence or order. Line colour = offence type Homicide Sexual Offences.. Volence related.. Burglary.. Drugs. Robbery.. Good order etc.... Traffic LEGEND Figure 20 Legend for offender timeline Line thickness (above line) = seriousness score Score <= 40 Score <= 100. Score <= 1000.. Score > 1000. Line thickness (below line )= sentence type Community sentenced Parole or ROC Remanded in custody Prison sentenced Timelines for offenders sentenced to Life Imprisonment Offenders sentenced to Life Imprisonment appear to divide equally into two categories: those with a significant history of offending prior to the Life sentence, and those who had little or no prior history of offending 11. A sample of offender timeless for Life-sentenced prisoners with significant previous offending histories appears immediately below. Violent and dishonesty offences predominate in these prior offences, with convictions and sentences for burglary being particularly common. 0 Age in years 80 0 Age in years 80 Figure 22 Sample of offenders with no history of offending Just over half (53 percent) of all offenders sentenced to Life Imprisonment have little or no prior history of offending 12. Offenders in this category are probably more likely to be released shortly after their parole eligibility date. 12 Note that this form of analysis counts only Corrections-administered sentences, and thus does not show convictions resulting in fines, discharges, and other lower-level sentencing outcomes. Figure 21 Sample of offenders with a strong history of offending 11 Offenders are counted as having a significant history of offending if there is at least one prison sentence, or five community sentences prior Life Imprisonment. 7 Offenders on Indeterminate sentences

Preventive Detention Offenders sentenced to Preventive Detention fall into one of three somewhat distinct categories. These include offenders with a significant history of offending of various types 13, those with multiple prior convictions and sentences but for sexual offending only 14, and those with only minor, or no prior convictions of any type. As with many chronic offenders who eventually receive Life Imprisonment, Preventive Detention offenders in the first group are revealed as having significant quantities of convictions for violent and dishonesty offences (including burglary), as indicated in the graphic below. Over 75 percent of offenders sentenced to Preventive Detention are found also to have significant histories of non-sexual offending. 0 Age in years 80 0 Age in years 80 Figure 24 Sample of offenders with a significant history of sexual offending Less common again are instances of Preventive Detention being imposed on offenders who present with no prior convictions or sentences for any type of offence, including sexual. Around ten percent of offenders sentenced to Preventive Detention are in this category the Preventive Detention sentence is the first time that they have been subjected to a prison term, and without any prior record of offending. However, as appears in the timelines examples given below, when Preventive Detention is the first prison term ever imposed on an individual there has been proven a long and serious history of sexual offending that may have spanned many years. Imposition of the sentence also signifies an assessed high risk of future re-offending. 0 Age in years 80 Figure 23 Sample of offenders with a significant history of offending Fourteen percent of offenders sentenced to Preventive Detention have significant offending histories which is exclusively, or very largely, sexual in nature. Example timelines are given in the following graphic (Figure 24). 13 An offender is counted as having a significant history of offending if he or she has at least one prison sentence or five community sentences prior to receiving Preventive Detention. 14 An offender is counted as having a significant history of sexual offending if he or she has at least one prison sentence or five prior community sentences for sexual offences prior to receiving Preventive Detention. Figure 25 Sample of PD offenders with little or no official record of previous sentencing 8 Offenders on Indeterminate sentences

Conclusion Indeterminate sentences are the most severe penalty that can be handed down by a court in New Zealand, and almost always reflect offending of the most serious type. At the end of 2013 there were 776 prisoners serving indeterminate sentences in New Zealand prisons. These offenders comprise 11% of the sentenced prison population. An additional 265 have completed their prison term and were being managed on parole in the community. These latter offenders are subject to recall to prison at any time, and will remain so for the rest of their lives. Based on trend of the last 20 years it appears likely that the number of prisoners on indeterminate sentences will continue to increase. This group of offenders will therefore continue to be an important focus for correctional policy and practice, both to ensure sound and humane management of these offenders while in prison, and to promote effective rehabilitation so that as many as realistically possible can eventually be released, without creating undue risks to public safety. 9 Offenders on Indeterminate sentences

Relevant source documents Conviction and Sentencing of Offenders in New Zealand: 1995 to 2004. (2006, Feb). Retrieved from Ministry of Justice: http://www.justice.govt.nz/publications/global-publications/c/conviction-and-sentencing-of-offenders-in-new-zealand- 1995-to-2004/4-custodial-sentences-and-remands Capital punishment in New Zealand. (2013, Aug 1). Retrieved from New Zealand History Online: http://www.nzhistory.net.nz/culture/the-death-penalty List of executions. (2013, Aug 1). Retrieved from New Zealand History Online: http://www.nzhistory.net.nz/culture/the-deathpenalty/notable-executions Criminal Justice Act 1954 - Section 32(2)(c), Section 75(1). (n.d.). Retrieved from New Zealand Legal Information Institute: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/legis/hist_act/cja19541954n50199/ Criminal Justice Act 1985 - Section 93. (n.d.). Retrieved from New Zealand Legal Information Institute: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/legis/hist_act/cja19851985n120199/ Criminal Justice Amendment Act (No 3) (1987 No 168) - Section 9(2)(c). (n.d.). Retrieved from New Zealand Legal Information Institute: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/legis/hist_act/cjaa319871987n168306/ Criminal Justice Amendment Act 1962 - Section 26(2)(c). (n.d.). Retrieved from New Zealand Legal Information Institute: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/legis/hist_act/cjaa19621962n29279/ Criminal Justice Amendment Act 1967 - Section 7(1)(c). (n.d.). Retrieved from New Zealand Legal Information Institute: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/legis/hist_act/cjaa19671967n48279/ Criminal Justice Amendment Act 1975 - Section 15(2). (n.d.). Retrieved from New Zealand Legal Information Institute: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/legis/hist_act/cjaa19751975n47279/ Parole Act 2002 (2002 No 10) - Section 29(3). (n.d.). Retrieved from New Zealand Acts As Enacted: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/legis/hist_act/pa20022002n10109/ Sentencing Act 2002 - Section 87(2)(b). (n.d.). Retrieved from New Zealand Legislation: http://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2002/0009/latest/dlm136454.html?search=ts_act%40bill%40regulation%40deem edreg_sentencing+_resel_25_a&p=1 Sentencing Act 2002 (2002 No 9) - Section 89(1), Section 103(1). (n.d.). Retrieved from New Zealand Legal Information Institute: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/legis/hist_act/sa20022002n9148/ 10 Offenders on Indeterminate sentences

Appendix 1 The following table shows the changes to the minimum non-parole periods for each indeterminate sentence type. Non parole periods for Life Imprisonment Criminal Justice Act 1954 Criminal Justice Amendment Act 1962 Criminal Justice Amendment Act 1967 Criminal Justice Amendment Act 1975 Criminal Justice Act 1985 Criminal Justice Amendment Act 1987 Sentencing Act 2002 5 years 10 years 6 years 7 years 7 years 10 years 10 years Non-parole periods for Preventive Detention Criminal Justice Act 1954 Criminal Justice Act 1985 Sentencing Act 2002 3 years 7 years 5 years 11 Offenders on Indeterminate sentences