Before Instruction Clarify Learning Targets & Plan

Similar documents
Principal Practice Observation Tool

Section Two: Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession

FRAMEWORK OF SUPPORT: SCHOOL-LEVEL PRACTICE PROFILE

NPS Formative Assessment Report Form (Counseling, Psychologists, and Social Workers)

TOOL KIT for RESIDENT EDUCATOR and MENT OR MOVES

Colorado Professional Teaching Standards

Pre-Requisites EDAM-5001 Early Literacy Guiding Principles and Language

Requirements EDAM WORD STUDY K-3: PRINT AWARENESS, LETTER KNOWLEDGE, PHONICS, AND HIGH FREQUENCY WORDS

Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation

BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA

Key Principles for ELL Instruction (v6)

The MSPA Rubric for Evaluation of School Psychologists

North Carolina TEACHER. evaluation process. Public Schools of North Carolina State Board of Education Department of Public Instruction

READING WITH. Reading with Pennsylvania Reading Specialist Certificate

Self-Assessment Duval County School System. Level 3. Level 3. Level 3. Level 4

Arkansas Teaching Standards

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Professional Development Self- Assessment Guidebook

ACTION 100 and Students Receiving Special Education Services

AND LEARNING 21st Century Teaching and Learning

Talent Development Secondary Assessment, Curriculum, and Instruction Blueprint Practices to Support a Culture of Success

Illinois Center for School Improvement Framework: Core Functions, Indicators, and Key Questions

Comprehensive Reading Plan K-12 A Supplement to the North Carolina Literacy Plan. North Carolina Department of Public Instruction

Final Intern Evaluation

I. Students succeed because teachers plan with individual learning results in mind.

The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support

CALIFORNIA S TEACHING PERFORMANCE EXPECTATIONS (TPE)

ON THE SAME PAGE EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION OF COLLEGE- AND CAREER-READY STANDARDS THROUGH LABOR-MANAGEMENT COLLABORATION

Teacher Rubric with Suggested Teacher and Student Look-fors

Crosswalk of the New Colorado Principal Standards (proposed by State Council on Educator Effectiveness) with the

APPENDIX A: Examples of Observations and Documentation

Dimensions and Functions for School Leaders

Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation

Professional Development Needs Assessment for Teachers

Effectiveness of Direct Strategy Instruction through SIOP

New York State Professional Development Standards (PDF/Word) New York State. Professional Development Standards. An Introduction

The Model of Successful School Nursing

STANDARD 1: THE TEACHER DEMONSTRATES APPLIED CONTENT KNOWLEDGE

EXAMPLE FIELD EXPERIENCE PLANNING TEMPLATE CCSU MAT Program

Instructional Management Plan

Position Statement on Science Education

Central Office Leadership Framework

Position Statement on English Language Arts Education Connecticut State Board of Education December 3, 2008

Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: Speech-Language Pathologists

Elementary and Middle School Technology Curriculum Guidelines

New Jersey Professional Standards for Teachers Alignment with InTASC NJAC 6A:9C-3.3 (effective May 5, 2014)

NCNSP Design Principle 1: Ready for College

Wappingers Central School District

North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards

Japanese International School. Assessment Recording and Reporting Policy

Committee On Public Secondary Schools. Standards for Accreditation

TLE Observation and Evaluation Rubric Teachers

MTSS Implementation Components Ensuring common language and understanding


Georgia Department of Education School Keys: Unlocking Excellence through the Georgia School Standards

Professionals Responsible for Campus Turnaround Plan Development: Name:

COBB KEYS SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM PERFORMANCE RUBRIC WITH EXAMPLES OF TEACHER EVIDENCE

Poetry Kids Online Learning Environment

Masters Comprehensive Exam and Rubric (Rev. July 17, 2014)

inacol Standards of Quality for Online Courses

Standards of Quality and Effectiveness for Professional Teacher Preparation Programs APPENDIX A

Revisioning Graduate Teacher Education in North Carolina Master of Arts in Elementary Education Appalachian State University

Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s School counselors

DRAFT For use in validation process only Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s School counselors

Teacher Evaluation. Missouri s Educator Evaluation System

2014/2015 ACADEMIC IMPROVEMENT PLAN TEMPLATE. 1) List report card areas where your school received D or F grades.

GEORGIA STANDARDS FOR THE APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION UNITS AND EDUCATOR PREPARATION PROGRAMS

Virtual Learning Solutions

Completed Formal Classroom Observation Form

Brigham Young University is fully accredited by the Northwest Association of Schools and Colleges.

Self Assessment Tool for Principals and Vice-Principals

Utah Educational Leadership Standards, Performance Expectations and Indicators

The University of North Carolina at Pembroke Academic Catalog

ILLINOIS CERTIFICATION TESTING SYSTEM

Peck Full Service Community School Improvement Plan Principal: Justin Cotton Jr.

USING DATA TO INFORM INSTRUCTION AND PERSONALIZE LEARNING

Standards for Professional Development

Principles to Actions

Class of 2020: Action Plan for Education

Curriculum and Instruction

Essential Principles of Effective Evaluation

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT (SIG) PRACTICE:

Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Social Workers

Framework for Leadership

National Standards of Practice for Entrepreneurship Education

Standards for Quality Online Courses Educational Technology Cooperative

NC TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS SAMPLE EVIDENCES AND ARTIFACTS

Study Guide. Developing Literate Mathematicians: A Guide for Integrating Language and Literacy Instruction into Secondary Mathematics

What are some effective standards-based classroom assessment practices?

RUBRIC ASSESSMENT: Online Educators

GUIDANCE. Rocky River City School District. Globally Competitive Exceptional Opportunites Caring Environment Successful Students

North Carolina New Schools Design Principle 1: Ready for College. Beginning Early Steps Growing Innovations New Paradigms

How To Teach

PROGRAM FOR LICENSING ASSESSMENTS FOR COLORADO EDUCATORS (PLACE )

Q Comp Requirements and Guiding Principles

CCSD CLASS KEYS CLASSROOM TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM PERFORMANCE RUBRIC WITH EXAMPLES OF TEACHER EVIDENCE

YOUNG FIVES PROGRAM THREE-YEAR SINGLE PLAN FOR STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT. Palo Alto Unified School District

Autism Spectrum Disorder Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria Rubric

Tips for Designing a High Quality Professional Development Program

A Framework for Coherence College and Career Readiness Standards, Multi-Tiered Systems of Support, and Educator Effectiveness

Section Three: Ohio Standards for Principals

Transcription:

Before Instruction Clarify Learning Targets & Plan Essential Question: What do students need to know, understand, and be able to do? Practice: Teachers clarify standards-based learning targets, define mastery and deliberately plan for effective assessment and instruction. (1)Strategy: Define Mastery Teachers collaboratively define and agree on what constitutes mastery of challenging, standardsbased learning targets. II.D., III.C. Teacher teams identify or develop tasks with a range of Depth of Knowledge levels (DOK 1-4) to serve as the basis for planning of assessment and instruction. (1B) Action: Teacher teams develop exemplars of performance to support shared understanding of mastery. (2)Strategy: Develop Assessment Tasks Teachers develop assessment tasks that guide the teaching/learning cycle and measure student mastery of challenging, standards-based content knowledge and skills. (3)Strategy: Design Standards-Based Unit/Lesson Teachers deliberately design units & lessons with challenging, standards-based learning targets using district-adopted curriculum. I.B., I.C., I.D., I.E., II.B., II.E. (4)Strategy: Communicate Clear Learning Targets Teachers develop stakeholders understanding of challenging, standards-based learning targets, of mastery, and of rigor. II.A., II.D., III.B. Teacher teams identify or develop common summative tasks with a range of Depth of Knowledge levels (DOK 1-4) prior to planning and instruction. Teacher teams design and align common formative tasks (DOK 1-3) to support students learning progression toward mastery. Teachers and/or teacher teams use common, standards-based unit or lesson templates to design and communicate planning for instruction. Teachers and/or teacher teams develop unit and lesson plans that are based upon and strategically embed formative and summative assessments. (3C) Action: Teachers and/or teacher teams develop unit and lesson plans that differentiate instruction for diverse student needs, that provide access and opportunity for all, and that close knowledge and skill gaps. (3D) Action: Teachers and/or teacher teams explicitly include the Colorado Academic Standards 21 st Century Skills and Readiness Competencies in unit and lesson plans. (4A) Action: Teachers and/or teacher teams communicate examples of rigorous summative tasks to stakeholders to develop shared understanding of the learning targets. (4B) Action: Teachers and/or teacher teams use models of summative performances and products to clarify learning targets, define mastery and guide student progress.

During Instruction Ensure Effective Classroom Practice Essential Question: How will we teach effectively to ensure students learn? Practice: Teachers ensure student equity through challenging, deliberate and effective instruction. (1)Strategy: Develop Positive Classroom Culture Teachers develop a positive classroom culture that promotes individual student learning, encourages academic risk-taking, fosters a collaborative spirit and closes academic gaps. II.E., II.F. (2)Strategy: Establish Effective Classroom Management Teachers collaborate with students to establish effective classroom management procedures and routines that insure a safe, respectful and efficient learning environment. II.E., II.F., III.B., III.D. Teachers develop and ensure an environment of positive, trusting relationships promoting respect, cultural responsiveness and caring, such that students are willing to ask questions, seek support and take academic risks. (1B) Action: Teachers create and sustain a culture of consistently high expectations for academic performance such that students know their purpose in class is to learn and make progress together. Teachers and students co-construct and actively maintain norms and routines such that students believe the classroom is respectful, fair and safe. Teachers effectively manage their classroom through clear, consistent expectations and efficient procedures to reduce challenging behaviors. (2C) Action: Teachers empower students to self-manage, to be individually accountable, and to hold one another responsible for meeting group expectations and goals. (3)Strategy: Model Clear Learning Targets Teachers provide models of clear learning targets and of what constitutes mastery with regard to product, performance and/or process. II.A., II.B., II. D. (2D) Action: Teachers partner with families to share mutual interests in student success. Teachers ensure that students can explain the long- and short-term learning targets and how classroom tasks relate to the essential learning. Teachers engage students with models of mastery or exemplars to ensure all students understand what defines success. (3C) Action: Teachers facilitate students in formulating individual and group learning goals that reflect high expectations.

During Instruction Ensure Effective Classroom Practice (4A) Action: Teachers pre-assess students to determine their learning readiness regarding pre-requisite skills and content knowledge prior to instruction. (4B) Action: Teachers use a variety of methods with students to seek and supply sources of motivation and relevance. (4)Strategy: Guarantee Access for All Teachers guarantee that, throughout instruction, all students have access to challenging, standardsbased curriculum that leads toward mastery. II. B., II. C., II. F., III. A. (4C) Action: Teachers activate students prior knowledge in order to understand their preconceptions or misconceptions and to further develop their background knowledge and vocabulary. (4D) Action: Teachers pre-teach or re-teach throughout the learning to close students gaps in background knowledge or academic performance. (4E) Action: Teachers leverage appropriate, available technologies to maximize students access to and mastery of grade-level skills and content knowledge. (5)Strategy: Build Disciplinary Literacy Teachers reinforce and extend students disciplinary literacy and knowledge through pursuing the big ideas and questions of disciplines, by developing the nature of thinking in disciplines, and in reading, writing and thinking like a practitioner. II. B., III. A. (4F) Action: Teachers use a variety of proven inclusion methods or Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol (SIOP) methods. (5A) Action: Teachers intentionally, systematically and in specific ways develop students content-specific, academic vocabulary. (5B) Action: Teachers guide students in close reading of complex, content-rich, informational text and in developing written responses that are grounded in textual evidence. (5C) Action: Teachers develop students abilities to identify what information is needed, to understand how information is organized, to locate and evaluate sources critically, and to consume and communicate information. (5D) Action: Teachers consistently model and develop in students higher-order aspects of disciplinary thought: curiosity, critical thinking and reasoning, creative thinking and innovating.

During Instruction Ensure Effective Classroom Practice (6)Strategy: Balance Instructional Design Teachers strategically create a balance between providing high-quality, explicit instruction and engaging students in well-designed, inquiry-based activities which foster individual discovery and construction of knowledge. I. E., I. F., II. B. (7)Strategy: Differentiate Instruction Teachers intentionally differentiate and develop alternatives in content, process or product to maximize learning opportunities for each student to develop understanding and mastery. I. C., II. F. (6A) Action: Teachers ensure students receive strategic, explicit instruction and modeling; guided, collaborative, group practice; and monitored, feedback-rich, individual practice. (6B) Action: Teachers intentionally use high quality questioning techniques throughout instruction and facilitate students in formulating and pursuing their own questions. (6C) Action: Teachers use inquiry-based learning tasks and methods and guide students in identifying, designing and researching their own interests. (7A) Action: Teachers coach students to learn effectively through intentionally organized peer-to-peer instruction and flexible, fluid groupings that are based on students needs. (7B) Action: Teachers leverage appropriate, available technologies and create classroom structures to maximize personalized learning opportunities for students. (7C) Action: Teachers use instructional methods and structures that maximize opportunities for student choice and flexibility in the classroom.

During Instruction Check for Understanding Essential Question: How will we know that students have learned? Practice: Teachers check for understanding to inform instruction and foster student ownership of learning. (1)Strategy: Seek Evidence of Learning Teachers strategically conduct effective classroom discussions and activities or tasks that elicit evidence of learning and progress toward mastery. Teachers check for students understanding through high quality classroom discussion with 100% student participation. (1B) Action Teachers provide opportunities for multiple modes of response or performance so students can demonstrate their understanding and progress toward mastery. (1C) Action: Teachers use a variety of Writing to Learn activities to check for students understanding. Teachers deliberately teach students to be recipients of feedback: requesting, receiving, interpreting, and acting on the feedback received. (2)Strategy: Advance Learning Through Feedback Teachers advance their own learning, together with their students learning, through cycles of formative assessment and feedback. I. A., I. C., II. F. (3)Strategy: Develop Student Ownership of Learning Teachers guide and support students in selfregulated learning so students ask and answer, Where am I going? How am I going there? Where to next? II. A., II. B., II. D. Teachers deliberately teach students to be donors of peer feedback: understanding the learning target, focusing on improvement, and delivering actionable feedback to move from the current state to the desired state. (2C) Action: Teachers provide individual student feedback that is timely, descriptive and actionable and that enables and motivates students to move their learning forward. (2D) Action: Teachers intentionally gather and use formative student data, from a variety of sources, to monitor and adjust their instruction so to meet student needs. (2E) Action: Teachers strategically conduct student observations and conferencing on a daily basis to gather and provide individual student feedback. Teachers ensure students can explain the learning target, can evaluate their learning gap(s), and can develop plans for their next steps in learning. Teachers enable students to take ownership of their own learning through critical reflection to manage their learning process, to problem-solve through obstacles, and to demonstrate resilience when they experience setbacks.

After Instruction Determine Response to Instruction Essential Question: What do we do when students don t learn or when they reach mastery before expectation? Practice: Teachers will determine each student s need for further differentiated instruction based on a body of evidence. Teachers analyze student performance on priority standards in summative assessments to determine how students did on must know, should know and could know standards. (1)Strategy (Assessment) Analyze Student Data Teachers analyze each student s body of performance data with regard to grade-level expectations to determine gaps and identify student needs. II. C., III. D. (2)Strategy (Curriculum) Verify Access Teachers and teacher teams examine assessment data to ensure student access to curriculum. II. C. (3)Strategy (Instruction) Differentiate Further Teachers reflect on effectiveness and appropriateness of instructional practices to determine further levels of differentiation and adjust instruction, as necessary, to meet student needs based on what the data indicate. I. C. (1B) Action: Teachers examine formative and summative assessments to evaluate progress, to identify outcomes mastered, and to determine whether the student s trend data show growth toward mastery. (1C) Action: Teachers enter, summarize, and interpret data for academic, social-emotional, and behavior skills. (1D) Action: Teachers collaborate with school experts to use diagnostic assessments to determine instructional needs, identify deficits for potential Tier 2 placements, and determine need for referral to Problem-Solving Team. (1E) Action: Teachers refine assessment tools to maximize their potential to inform and adjust instruction. Teachers and teacher teams review standardsbased curriculum to ensure student access of grade-level curriculum. Teachers and teacher teams review curriculum for appropriate types of acceleration, remediation, and/or enrichment based on students needs. Teachers re-evaluate and adjust, as necessary, the pyramid of students within class (above grade level, at grade level, below grade level) to determine needs and areas for intervention. Teachers identify opportunities to reteach, reinforce, or enrich the current unit or to intentionally plan for the next unit. (3C) Action: Teachers adjust grouping strategies for Tier 1 differentiation based on pre-assessment, formative, and summative data. (3D) Action: Teachers identify and intentionally plan formative assessments to monitor student learning and the effectiveness of differentiated instruction.