Fiber Options. 2015 Service Provider Training. June 2, 2015 Phoenix June 16, 2015 Tampa



Similar documents
Dark Fiber Eligibility

Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism Eligible Services List

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

E-Rate in FY 2016 and Beyond Under the E-Rate Modernization Orders

Brief Engineering Assessment: Cost estimate for building fiber optics to key anchor institutions

City of Baltimore. Broadband Public Infrastructure Strategies Report. Draft Version 3.0 June 8, 2015

Best Practices from BTOP & Key Implications for Bidding & Sustainability New NY Broadband Program: Bidders/Stakeholders Forum

Alaska Broadband Audit Report May 2015 Page 62

Request for Proposals Erate Category 1 Hosted VoIP Service Hinds County School District

VOIP Eligibility FCC Order on Bundled Services That Include Eligible And Ineligible Components

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF THE UNITED STATES TELECOM ASSOCIATION

Request for Proposal FCC Healthcare Connect Fund ADDENDUM. Bidders Conference 2/25/2014. Bid Closing Extended to 3/7/2014

Request for Proposal Sparta Community Hospital District FCC Healthcare Connect Fund

Connecting America s Students: Opportunities for Action. An Analysis of E-rate Spending Offers Key Insights for Expanding Educational Opportunity

Broadband Connectivity to Government and Local Government Institutions in Bangladesh

PSCOC Status Update October 5, 2015

Request for Proposals. St Charles CUSD 303 ERATE PROGRAM INTERNET SERVICES

Dark Fiber Lease Considerations

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS ADDENDUM #1

FRCC NETWORK SERVICES REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

INTERNET SERVICE FOR OAKLAND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) FOR E-RATE 17 ( )

Hosted VoIP RFP. Throughout this document, the word System refers to The Jackson Hinds Library System

Technology for Educational Achievement (TEACH) Phone: Fax:

ADSL or Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line. Backbone. Bandwidth. Bit. Bits Per Second or bps

FCC Healthcare Connect Fund

Request for Quote E- Rate Eligible Services Scope of Work - Hosted Voice over IP. Background: General Specifications:

Technology Readiness in Michigan

Michigan Higher Education Dark Fiber Acquisition Project

Fiber Asset Management Software Internet2 Performance Working Group Joint Techs July Carla S. Hunt MCNC Mgr., Knowledge and Information Systems

From: To: Subject: Date: Attachments:

RFP No. DPS FY15 UC. ANSWER: Yes, we are seeking Priority 1 Cloud Based solutions.

M E M O R A N D U M. Issue Statement. Background

Hosted VoIP RFP. Throughout this document, the word District refers to Smith County School District

Pursuant to past Board action, EWEB s three Dark Fiber rates will automatically be adjusted on April 1, 2016 per the City of Portland CPI as shown:

The Business Case for Government Fiber Optics in Holly Springs. Prepared for the Town of Holly Springs, North Carolina June 2013

How To Design An Outside Plant (Osp) Network Design

Connect & Go with WDM PON Ea 1100 WDM PON

Current access technologies overview

Glossary of Telco Terms

Choosing the right Internet solution for your business.

PUBLIC NOTICE WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU SEEKS COMMENT ON PROPOSED ELIGIBLE SERVICES LIST FOR THE E-RATE PROGRAM. WC Docket No.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL E-RATE Funding Year 2015 HOSTED VOICE OVER IP (VOIP) for Tunica County School District

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL WAN AND INTERNET AND HOSTED VOIP

I n t e l l i g e n t N e t w o r k S o l u t i o n s

FRONTIER TELEPHONE COMPANIES TARIFF FCC NO. 6 Original Page 19-1 ACCESS SERVICE INTERCONNECTION BETWEEN COLLOCATED SPACES

WHITE PAPER: Broadband Bonding for VoIP & UC Applications. In Brief. mushroomnetworks.com. Applications. Challenge. Solution. Benefits.

Think! Think! Data communications. Long-Distance. Modems: to analog and back. Transmission Media. The last mile is the hardest for digital information

Hosted VoIP RFP. Throughout this document, the word District refers to BRUNEAU GRAND VIEW JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT #365

REGIONAL DISTRICT OF NORTH OKANAGAN

Hosted VoIP RFP. Subject

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL HCF-05

Federal Telecom Issues: What s Going on in D.C.? Montana Telecoms. Assn. 9/01/15

MCLEOD INDEP SCHOOL DISTRICT. Request for Proposal - Internet Access

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS: Internet Access Service. For: Peach County School District (BEN: )

Dark fiber vs. lit fiber. The benefits of choosing dark fiber over a traditional lit carrier

Gamma. Reliable, high speed data connectivity for business. Data services. Network Solutions

COMPUTERS ARE YOUR FUTURE CHAPTER 8 WIRED & WIRELESS COMMUNICATION

Broadband in New York State. David Salway, Director NYS Broadband Program Office

General Tariff Information. Public Fixed Telecommunications Networks and Services Tariff Number B Tariff Effective Date

Transcription:

2015 Service Provider Training Fiber Options June 2, 2015 Phoenix June 16, 2015 Tampa

Agenda Today we ll talk about: Review of the FCC s Second E-Rate Modernization Order Expanding Access to Broadband for FY2016 and beyond Deep Dive: Fiber Construction 2

Fiber Options Second E-rate Modernization Order Review 3

Expanding Access to Broadband Overview Emphasis on providing additional flexibility for schools and libraries seeking high-speed broadband connections. Lack of access to broadband, especially in rural areas, and high cost of those services are major obstacles in meeting program goals. Order designed to help close the rural connectivity gap and increase affordability of high-speed broadband connections. Most provisions take effect from FY2016 forward. 4

Expanding Access to Broadband What s New? E-rate funded special construction for new fiber. Cost of deploying new fiber (as opposed to ongoing cost of leasing or maintaining/operating fiber.) Provides up-front capital that will reduce monthly recurring cost to applicants. Available for lit services, dark fiber, and selfprovisioned fiber. 5

Expanding Access to Broadband What Stays the Same? Regardless of the services sought (including new fiber options), E-rate rules continue to require that applicants: Conduct fair and open competitive bidding process. Select the most cost-effective bid. 6

Expanding Access to Broadband Amortization of Up Front Construction Costs Old Requirement Applicants had to amortize large, up-front construction costs in excess of $500,000 over three years. New Requirement E-rate will now pay the full discounted share of up-front special construction charges in the first year. 7

Expanding Access to Broadband Installment Payments for Special Construction Costs Previous Requirement Applicants had to pay their share of nonrecurring cost of special construction within 90 days of the start of service. E-rate will now allow: Applicants are allowed to pay their share of those up-front costs in installment payments over up to four years. 8

Expanding Access to Broadband Installment Payment Plan of Up Front Construction Costs Applicants interested in an installment payment plan option must indicate their interest on FCC Form 470. Service providers are under no obligation to offer such installment payment options to applicants. 9

Expanding Access to Broadband Equalizing Dark and Lit Fiber Beginning FY2016, funding for lit and dark fiber has been equalized. Dark fiber leases allow the purchase of fiber capacity separate from the service of lighting the fiber. 10

Expanding Access to Broadband Equalizing Dark and Lit Fiber Old Dark Fiber Rule E-rate would only pay special construction costs up to the applicant s property line. Modulating electronics not eligible in Category One. New Dark Fiber Rule E-rate will now pay special construction costs beyond an applicant s property line. Modulating electronics to light dark fiber will be eligible for Category One support. 11

Special Construction Projects Expanding Access to Broadband Applicants can receive funding for Category One infrastructure costs incurred up to six months prior to start of funding year. Occurs after selection of service provider via an FCC Form 470. Category One recurring service depends on installation. Actual service start date is on or after July 1 of the funding year. Can get one year extension due to unavoidable delays. 12

Expanding Access to Broadband Requirement to Compare Dark and Lit Fiber Applicants that seek bids for dark fiber must also seek bids for lit fiber service over comparable time period. Before selecting a dark fiber solution, applicants must fairly compare dark fiber with other available options to ensure the most cost-effective option is chosen. 13

Expanding Access to Broadband Requirement to Compare Dark and Lit Fiber (continued) To the extent an applicant intends to seek support for equipment and maintenance costs associated with lighting dark fiber, those costs must be included in the same application with the dark fiber lease. Applicants will not receive support for excess capacity and may only receive special construction support for dark fiber lit in the same funding year. 14

Expanding Access to Broadband Self-Construction of High-Speed Broadband Networks Applicants may seek E-rate support for self-construction of their own high-speed broadband networks, or portions of such networks, when self-construction is the most cost-effective solution. Applications for self-provisioned networks should reflect the total cost of ownership, including special construction, equipment, and maintenance and operation. 15

Expanding Access to Broadband Self-Construction of High-Speed Broadband Networks Requirements: Applicants soliciting bids for self-construction must also seek bids for lit service on the same FCC Form 470, unless the applicant already posted for broadband services for this same funding year and received no bids. Applicants must compare the cost of lit service to the total cost of ownership over the life of the facility for selfconstruction option. Applicants seeking dark fiber or self-construction must upload an RFP in new the FCC Form 470 system. 16

Expanding Access to Broadband Guidance on RFPs Be as specific as possible to enable meaningful comparison of lit, dark, and self-provisioned options. Include estimated bandwidth sought. Terms such as as needed or district-wide are not sufficient descriptions of the quantity or capacity of the products and services requested. Applicants may identify a range, such as 100-200 Mpbs. Include expected growth rate in bandwidth demand over the relevant time period and seek pricing for the increased level of bandwidth over time. 17

Expanding Access to Broadband Guidance on RFPs Include any state or local procurement requirements. RFPs must be available for at least 28 days. Fiber RFPs take time to write. Potential bidders need more time to respond to these bids. Start early! 18

Expanding Access to Broadband Competitive Bidding Considerations Old Rules Applicants must conduct fair and open competitive bidding process. Applicants had to select the most cost-effective service provider. Price of eligible products and services must be the most heavily weighted bid eval factor New Rules Applicants must conduct fair and open competitive bidding process. Applicants had to select the most cost-effective service provider. Price of eligible products and services must be the most heavily weighted bid eval factor 19

Expanding Access to Broadband Competitive Bidding Considerations Comparing different fiber options: Determine a reasonable, defensible period of time for the comparison, based on their anticipated use of the assets. Applicants that choose to self-provision or purchase the equipment required to operate a dark fiber IRU may expect to recover their costs in 5, 7, 10, or even 20 years. Identify a comprehensive and specific total cost for each option. 20

Expanding Access to Broadband Competitive Bidding Considerations Comparing different fiber options: Applicants must be prepared to explain their assumptions, such as expected useful life. Divide total cost of IRU or self-provisioned fiber by number of years to determine annual cost. Compare to annual lit fiber charge. Applicants cannot resell service. Applicants must secure access to necessary resources. 21

Expanding Access to Broadband Cost Effectiveness USAC will focus on verifying the cost effectiveness analysis explained above in the bid evaluation phase. When applicants add up the total anticipated costs over a reasonable, defensible time period, the most cost effective option will be clear in most cases. Would this be the right solution if it was the applicant s own money? 22

Expanding Access to Broadband Cost Allocation For shared or multi-purpose fiber build projects, costs necessary to get the fiber to the school or library are eligible. E-rate will not fund capacity beyond what the applicant needs in that funding year. Applicants may not seek E-rate funds for excess fiber that is not in use or being used by other entities in the project. Example: Applicant needs 12 strands of fiber. Construction is for 96 strands. If no plans for other customers, only remove cost for 84 additional strands, but all other special construction costs would be fully eligible. 23

Expanding Access to Broadband Additional Matching Funds for Fiber Builds Providing an incentive for state support of last-mile broadband facilities. E-rate match of up to 10% of the cost of construction will be provided to match state funding for special construction charges for high-speed broadband connections. E-rate match also provided for Tribal schools and libraries when matched by state, Tribal government, or other federal agency. 24

Fiber Options Deep Dive: Fiber Construction 25

Resilient and Inexpensive Infrastructure Why Fiber? 26

Why Fiber? Unlimited Capacity Single Fiber Pair 27

Fiber Basics General Industry Definitions * Special Construction on lit fiber service Service provider owned Upfront capital to reduce monthly recurring costs * The definitions in the following slides are general industry definitions, not formal FCC or USAC definitions. Special construction for dark fiber Newly eligible (beyond property Line) Long term lease (IRU) or build Applicant must light and maintain fiber or hire a third party to do so 28

Fiber Basics General Industry Definitions Indefeasible Right of Use (IRU) In telecommunications, Indefeasible Right of Use (IRU) is the effective long-term lease (usually a capital lease) of a portion of the capacity of an existing or to-be-constructed cable. IRUs are specified in terms of a certain number of strands of fiber. IRU is granted by the company or consortium of companies that built the (usually optical fiber) cable. Some IRU legal agreements forbid resale of the strands. A typical IRU ownership period is granted for 20 years. 29

Fiber Basics General Industry Definitions Lit Transport Bandwidth or Transport Bandwidth Transport bandwidth is a dedicated amount of capacity for transporting Internet Protocol data, voice and or video traffic between two designated points. This capacity is usually measured in Mbps or Gbps. Transport circuits do not included access to the commercial Internet. 30

Fiber Basics General Industry Definitions Internet access bandwidth This is also typically termed Internet Service Provider bandwidth. This is a dedicated amount of capacity to access the commercial Internet. This bandwidth is purchased from one of several Internet points of presence (PoPs) across the country. Typically a customer buys transport bandwidth to reach a PoP and then access bandwidth from the PoP to access the Commercial Internet. 31

Fiber Basics General Industry Definitions Dark Fiber Unused optical fiber that has been constructed/installed but is not currently being used in fiberoptic communications. Because fiber-optic cable transmits information in the form of light pulses, a "dark" cable refers to one through which light pulses are not being transmitted. Lit Fiber Optical fiber that is regularly being used to transmit data. 32

Fiber Basics General Industry Definitions Aerial Fiber Fiber construction where the fiber is placed on existing or newly built poles. Fiber typically shares space with electrical transmission lines on these poles. Attachment Fee An annual fee charged by a utility pole owner as rental for the placement of fiber on their utility pole. Buried Fiber Fiber construction where the fiber, typically placed in a plastic conduit, is buried underground. Industry standard is to bury fiber and conduit at a depth of 3 or more. 33

Special Construction When to consider special construction for lit fiber service? Projected bandwidth demand outstrips the capacity of the existing infrastructure. Local market will yield lit service bids that cost effectively scale to meet the need. Capital costs to upgrade infrastructure are significant and special construction capital will reduce monthly recurring costs. 34

Special Construction When will an applicant likely consider self-provisioning of dark fiber? Projected bandwidth demand outstrips the capacity of the existing infrastructure. Total cost of ownership analysis of lit service vs. dark fiber, including costs reflecting the complexity of ownership, are very favorable. Assumptions on bandwidth growth and costs are reasonable and defensible. There are no other options, or no other cost-effective options available. 35

Entity 1 District/System WAN Self-provisioning: Example A Advanced Networks Entity 2 District/System Hub or CO/PoP Local Loop Aggregation Network Entity 3 Orange lines indicate potential for special construction Internet Drain 36

Self-provisioning: Example B Entity 1 District WAN Advanced Networks Entity 2 District/ System Hub or CO/PoP Local Loop Regional Hub or CO/PoP Aggregation Network Entity 3 Internet Drain Orange lines indicate potential for special construction (Billed based on use) 37

Self-provisioning: Example C Library or School Local Loop CO or POP Internet Drain Orange lines indicate potential for special construction 38

Self-provisioning Dark fiber special construction options: Indefeasible Right of Use (IRU) of Existing or New Build Fiber Capital Lease length in range of 5-20 years Lessee still responsible for lighting Annual maintenance and operations Markers General inspection Cuts and relocates pro rata share Eligible Services list for details Construction Applicant can ask for design build or act as own General Contractor If General Contractor every element must be bid separately Engineering/Environmental Outside plant Construction Electronics Legal and administrative Responsible for operations and maintenance of entire build Contemplating partnership builds and parameters of this Eligible Services list for details 39

Special Construction Information for USAC review Applicants and service providers should expect detailed review of self construction applications. A sampling of information applicants and service providers should be prepared to offer: 471 IRU 471 Build Lit service cost comparison Term Miles and strands Annual lit operating costs Annual maintenance Fees Cuts and relocates Lit service cost comparison Miles and strands Estimated cost per mile Annual lit operating costs Annual maintenance Fees Cuts and relocates 40

Special Construction Guidance to Applicants Added support planned for applicants Self identify early RFP process start early! Key information End points of service Proposed route Known right of way, pole attachment (aerial), railroad crossing or environmental issues 41

Special Construction Items to Consider: IRU RFPs Length of IRU should be seen as commitment to use Consider whether annual maintenance fee should be part of bid Cuts and relocates clauses Follow your state and local procurement regulations Ability to pay clause included Timelines for test and completion Specification for repair of cuts or outages Outside plant specs Electronics specs 42

Special Construction Items to Consider: Construction RFPs Be as specific as possible. Long term commitment to use the fiber Be aware of state and local procurement regulations including ability to pay Timelines for completion of every phase of work engineering, OSP manufacturing, construction, permitting, electronics delivery, maintenance Outside plant, electronics, and maintenance specifications Aerial or buried construction specs Annual fee for pole attachments for aerial Specification for repair of cuts or outages 43

Special Construction Items to Consider: Annual Maintenance Who will light and operate the fiber? Define the managed service provided? What role in notification/troubleshoot/noc What role in fiber repair What role in electronics repair Bandwidth limitations, if any 44

Fiber Scenarios 1. Applicants are already proactively seeking advice 2. Library system has state appropriation to bring fiber to 95 locations 45

Fiber Options Scenario 1: Special Construction Program Lit Service Special Construction Applicant needs upgraded service from 1.544 mbps to 20 mbps and beyond. Lit service in the region is scalable and cost effective so special construction with no installment payment option met the need. Service provider maintains ownership of the fiber. 46

Fiber Options Scenario 2: Fiber Greenfield Opportunity State has 95 libraries it wants to serve with owned fiber. FCC Form 470 calls for comparison of Lit Service to new build fiber (acquired via IRU). FCC Form 470 outlines 95 builds from library premise to regional aggregation points and also outlines a minimum 50 mbps service as a minimum. Service Provider bids both scenarios showing cost comparison as part of the bid. 47

Thank you! 48