The American Panel Survey



Similar documents
The AmeriSpeak ADVANTAGE

Appendix I: Methodology

2014 National Study of Long-Term Care Providers (NSLTCP) Adult Day Services Center Survey. Restricted Data File. July 2015

Why Sample? Why not study everyone? Debate about Census vs. sampling

KNOWLEDGEPANEL DESIGN SUMMARY

17% of cell phone owners do most of their online browsing on their phone, rather than a computer or other device

2015 Michigan Department of Health and Human Services Adult Medicaid Health Plan CAHPS Report

Oregon Health Insurance Survey

OCCUPATIONS & WAGES REPORT

Introduction to Sampling. Dr. Safaa R. Amer. Overview. for Non-Statisticians. Part II. Part I. Sample Size. Introduction.

Descriptive Methods Ch. 6 and 7

E-reader Ownership Doubles in Six Months

2015 National Nurse Practitioner Compensation Survey: An Overview June 2015

Americans and text messaging

The Demographics of Social Media Users 2012

THE FIELD POLL. By Mark DiCamillo, Director, The Field Poll

Kaiser Family Foundation/New York Times Survey of Chicago Residents

THE FIELD POLL. By Mark DiCamillo, Director, The Field Poll

University of Hawai i Human Studies Program. Guidelines for Developing a Clinical Research Protocol

Americans and their cell phones

THE FIELD POLL. By Mark DiCamillo, Director, The Field Poll

Educational Attainment

71% of online adults now use video sharing sites

Hoover Institution Golden State Poll Fieldwork by YouGov October 3-17, List of Tables. 1. Family finances over the last year...

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, January, 2016, Republican Primary Voters: More Conservative than GOP General Election Voters

How To Collect Data From Angler Expenditure Data Collection

Cell Phone Activities 2013

Introduction Qualitative Data Collection Methods... 7 In depth interviews... 7 Observation methods... 8 Document review... 8 Focus groups...

Employment-Based Health Insurance: 2010

Voting and Political Demography in 1996

THE FIELD POLL. By Mark DiCamillo, Director, The Field Poll

Survey research. Contents. Chaiwoo Lee. Key characteristics of survey research Designing your questionnaire

Internet, broadband, and cell phone statistics

Data Collection and Sampling OPRE 6301

Breast Cancer Registry of Greater Cincinnati (BCRGC) APPLICATION for ACCESS to INFORMATION/DATA

Danny R. Childers and Howard Hogan, Bureau of the,census

Pearson Student Mobile Device Survey 2013

In all 1336 (35.9%) said yes, 2051 (55.1%) said no and 335 (9.0%) said not sure

SAMPLE DESIGN RESEARCH FOR THE NATIONAL NURSING HOME SURVEY

The SURVEYFREQ Procedure in SAS 9.2: Avoiding FREQuent Mistakes When Analyzing Survey Data ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION SURVEY DESIGN 101 WHY STRATIFY?

INTERNATIONAL SOCIAL SURVEY PROGRAMME (ISSP) WORKING PRINCIPLES

THE JOINT HARMONISED EU PROGRAMME OF BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SURVEYS

Exploratory Research & Beyond

SAMPLING & INFERENTIAL STATISTICS. Sampling is necessary to make inferences about a population.

Global Food Security Programme A survey of public attitudes

Random Digit National Sample: Telephone Sampling and Within-household Selection

ASSESSING THE EFFECTS OF SANDY ON THE ELECTION: THE DOG THAT DIDN T BARK

Release #2443 Release Date: Thursday, February 28, 2013

Appending a Prepaid Phone Flag to the Cell Phone Sample

SAMPLING METHODS IN SOCIAL RESEARCH

2003 Annual Survey of Government Employment Methodology

The Irish Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) Study 2010

Self-Check and Review Chapter 1 Sections

THE FIELD POLL. By Mark DiCamillo, Director, The Field Poll

Patient Responsibility in Health Care: An AARP Bulletin Survey

Cash Rents Methodology and Quality Measures

Techniques for data collection

Survey Research. Classifying surveys on the basis of their scope and their focus gives four categories:

ESOMAR 28: SurveyMonkey Audience

The AP-Viacom Survey of Youth on Education March, 2011

A Comparison of Level of Effort and Benchmarking Approaches for Nonresponse Bias Analysis of an RDD Survey

Why the Gamboa-Gibson Disability Work- Life Expectancy Tables Are Without Merit

Florida s Families and Children Below the Federal Poverty Level

SYNOPSIS OF THE THESIS ON A STUDY ON HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IN BPO WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO HIGH EMPLOYEE ATTRITION

SECTION ON GOVERNANCE

Health Insurance Coverage: Estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, 2004

Social Media and Political Engagement

Hawaii County Consumer Spending: Research and Economic Analysis Division Department of Business, Economic Development & Tourism

BY Aaron Smith NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE MARCH 10, 2016 FOR MEDIA OR OTHER INQUIRIES:

Survey of Clinical Trial Awareness and Attitudes

Research Overview: Telephone versus Online Research Advantages and Pitfalls

OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES FOR STATISTICAL SURVEYS September Table of Contents

NATIONAL: HOUSE SPEAKERSHIP SHADOWS GOP 2016

How are polls conducted? by Frank Newport, Lydia Saad, David Moore from Where America Stands, 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Transcription:

Draft: To be updated in June Guide for Investigators The American Panel Survey Weidenbaum Center Washington University James L. Gibson and Steven S. Smith, Directors About The American Panel Survey (TAPS) TAPS is a monthly online survey of a national probability sample of about 2,000 adults in the United States. A variety of social science investigators use the panel. Most studies concern the economic and political attitudes and behavior of the American public. The panel was recruited in May- July, 2011, using an address- based sampling (ABS) frame. That is, from a random selection of residential addresses, stratified using ancillary data on age and ethnic group, a panel of 2,000 was recruited. TAPS surveys are administered online; selected panelists who do not have a computer or on- line service are provided access by TAPS. TAPS surveys are conducted for the Weidenbaum Center by Knowledge Networks, a leading online survey research firm located in Palo Alto, California. The panel results in a minimum of 1,550 completed interviews per month. Instrument Design The directors of TAPS, in consultation with other scholars, have established a battery of demographic and other questions that are asked of all panelists. In addition, a large set of recurring questions is asked about economic and political subjects. The schedule for recurring questions some monthly, some less frequently is provided in the Recurring Questions section below. In addition to recurring questions, research modules of up to 15 minutes may be placed on each month s survey. TAPS directors work with investigators to schedule research modules taking into account research needs and the necessity of maintaining the panel.

Prices (July 1, 2011- June 30, 2012) Base Fees. The base prices for a research module are based on significant fixed costs and additional costs associated with the length of the survey. Fixed costs included the recruitment and maintenance of the panel, staffing costs at Knowledge Networks and the Weidenbaum Center, the accumulation of background data on panelists, participation incentives for panelists, use of the mail and telephone to prompt panelists, and data management. The length of survey affects programming and staff time, data and codebook preparation, and the limited resource of access to panelists. Fee Schedule, July 1, 2011- June 30, 2012 Survey Length Fee 5 minutes or less $49,333.00 10 minutes 61,667.00 15 minutes 74,000.00 20 minutes 86,333.00 Fees for surveys of other lengths are prorated according to these fees. Base fees include the following deliverables: Data in a standard format (STATA, SPSS, Excel), a codebook in Word, weights, and documentation on sample details. Background Data. The base fees include up to 15 variables of demographic and other variables (value of approximately $12,000). TAPS has data on all 15 variables for nearly all panelists. The selection of background variables is listed in Background Variables below. Data from Previous Surveys. Responses to questions asked in previous surveys are available when the data are not committed to other investigators. TAPS cannot guarantee that data are available for all panelists on all questions. The price per question is $750. Panel Designs. TAPS has a panel design that should be exploited by investigators. The base prices apply to both cross- sectional and panel designs. For example, a five- minute battery of questions that is repeated at four different times is a 20- minute survey. Special Fees. TAPS directors work with investigators to establish prices for projects that require special programming or other staff support, such as projects that involve streaming media.

Pre- Proposals and Proposals for Research Modules Investigators should submit pre- proposals for research modules to the TAPS directors as early as possible but no later than 6 months before they hope to be in the field. A pre- proposal should be 3-4 single spaced pages and include (a) a statement of the importance of the work, (b) the major hypotheses, (c) a discussion of the number and type of questions that are expected to be used, and (d) a proposed date for the survey(s). A successful pre- proposal review will result in a request for a longer proposal that includes a draft questionnaire. Research modules will be scheduled to account for several considerations: The purposes of the research, other TAPS research modules and priorities, and panel maintenance. Investigators Responsibilities Each investigator is responsible for the following steps in the research process 1. successful completion of the IRB process required by a funding agency or home university at least one month before the scheduled survey (documentation must be provided); 2. delivery of a draft questionnaire to TAPS directors at least six weeks before the scheduled survey; 3. analysis of pre- test data; 4. revision of the questionnaire and approval of TAPS directors at least four weeks before the scheduled survey; 5. half payment of the fees at least two weeks before the scheduled survey; 6. full payment of the fees within one month following delivery of data and codebook.

Sampling Methodology and Recruitment The sample of addresses is drawn from the U.S. Postal Service s computerized delivery sequence file (CDSF). The CDSF covers some 97% of the physical addresses in all 50 states including P.O. boxes and rural route addresses. Homes that are vacant or seasonal are identified as are other categories that help to refine the efficiency of the sample to be mailed. Using data from available U.S. Census files plus from a variety of commercial data bases, such as White Pages, Experian, Acxiom, etc., MSG can add names to these addresses, match with landline telephone numbers, and with some level of accuracy tag on information regarding race/ethnicity, age of householder, whether there are people of a certain age in the household, presence of children, home ownership status, etc. Based on recent experience with the recruitment of an online panel with the ABS frame, TAPS strata are designed to specifically break out young adults (ages 18-24) and Hispanics, in addition to the balance of the population. Young adults and Hispanics may be strategically oversampled because these groups have a tendency to under- respond to surveys. Four mutually exclusive strata are used: 1. 18-24 year- old Hispanic adults 2. All other Hispanic adults ages 25+ or age unknown 3. 18-24 year- old non- Hispanic adults 4. All other adults that are non- Hispanic or ethnicity unknown and ages 25+ or age unknown The estimated yield from each of the above strata is 5.6%, 6.4%, 14.4% and 9.4%, respectively [actual yields to be updated in September]. Within- household selection procedures vary by the mode in which the household responds to the initial contact. Details are available upon request. A successful recruitment is counted only when a Profile Survey is completed. The resulting sample design and expected outcome is as follows [to be updated in September]: Stratum A. Mailing B. Yields C. Profiled D. Strata Distributions count distribution proportion count proportion count sample frame 1 Hispanic 18-24 333 1.0% 0.056 19 0.65 12 0.6% 0.2% 2 Hispanic 25+/unk 6,943 19.9% 0.064 445 0.65 289 14.4% 14.1% 3 Other 18-24 469 1.3% 0.144 68 0.65 44 2.2% 0.7% 4 All Else 25+/unk 27,071 77.8% 0.094 2,550 0.65 1,657 82.8% 85.0% Overall 34,816 3,081 2,003 100.0% 100.0%

TAPS will recruit additional sample in later years to maintain the panel size of 2,000 U.S. adult English- speaking members as some members leave the panel. Replacement recruiting will be conducted using the same methods as the original panel. A schedule for replacement recruiting is available upon request. Sample Features A panel of about 2,000 English- speaking adults in the U.S. has been created. We estimate that approximately 80% of the TAPS Panel (1,600) will complete each TAPS wave during the first year and 75% will complete each survey in the second and subsequent years. TAPS will provide a minimum of 1,550 completes per wave with a minimum of three weeks in the field. The TAPS Panel is closely matched to the CPS estimates of the American population on key demographic characteristics, as show in the table below. Recurring Questions [to be updated in June] Schedule of Recurring Questions Monthly Every two months Every Six Months Once a Year job approval for key national political actors most impt problem Qs party id battery of issue Qs household and country economic evaluations household spending and saving expectations presidential candidate preferences in election year reelect? ideological id favorability measure (parties, institutions, candidates) political/economic knowledge political participation happiness plan to vote political process Qs: filibuster, veto generic congressional vote tolerance institutional legitimacy media use campaign exposure

Weighting TAPS calculates weights to make survey results generalizable to the U.S. population of English- speaking adults. Investigators will receive these weights as variables in delivered data files. Adjustments are made to compensate for (a) selection probabilities altered by the stratified sample design and (b) within household selection probabilities associated with the random choice of a panel member from among all eligible adults residing in the household. These adjustments constitute the base weight that corrects the sample to approximate a simple random sample of the population of adults. The following weight, w1i k, for mailing addresses i within stratum k is calculated as follows: where w1i k = (Pi k / Ptot) (Stot / Si k) Pi k is the population or frame count within stratum k, Ptot is the total population count from the frame, Si k is the sample count within stratum k, and Stot is the total recruited sample size. We also adjust for the selection probability of the randomly selected adult within households. To adjust for this, we weight each selected respondent, r, by the inverse of the number of eligible adults, A, ages 18 and older, enumerated as residing in household, h, and call this w2r h and calculate as follows: w2r h = Ah / 1 The base weight is the product of w1i k and w2r h. 1 TAPS directors can provide an estimate of design effects upon request. Investigators may choose to use the estimated design effect to adjust standard errors in statistical estimates. 1 An additional adjustment will be made for our follow- up efforts to recruit panelists by telephone after an initial nonresponse. Households recruited based on the telephone follow- up may over- represent addresses in the sample with a successful telephone match. Based on the natural match rate in the sample, recruited households from the telephone recruitment will be weighted downward appropriately.

Background Variables [to be updated in June] 1. age 2. sex 3. race/ethnicity 4. marital status 5. religion 6. religious service attendance 7. education 8. employed 9. occupation 10. citizenship 11. household income 12. personal income 13. home ownership 14. ideological self identification 15. party identification

IRB Review The Washington University IRB process has been completed for core features of TAPS. TAPS is given an exempt status as a survey project on which the identifiers are not provided to TAPS directors or investigators and proper protocols to acquire informed consent and preserve confidentiality are in place. Upon request, TAPS directors can provide information that may be useful to investigators who must complete IRB review for funding agencies and home universities.