Number of income earners who actually pay income tax at the higher rate



Similar documents
Rates of Tax 2011/12 Resident Individuals

CHAPTER 27. Taxation of Retirement Lump Sums. Revised September 2015

[ ] Payments on Termination of an Office or Employment or a Change in its Functions

Guide to Calculating your Income Tax Liability for Additional Notes -

Income in the Netherlands is categorised into boxes. The above table relates to Box 1 income.

Capital gains tax for non-residents disposing of UK residential property: Final Rules

CHAPTER 21 OVERSEAS TRUSTS CGT AND IHT ISSUES

Human Resources. Employee Payroll FAQ

Payroll Tax in the Costing of Government Services

- 1 - Finance Act 2008 changes to the Capital Gains Tax charge on beneficiaries of non-resident settlements. Contents.

How the Dividend Tax Reform Could Benefit You?

PENSIONS AT A GLANCE 2009: RETIREMENT INCOME SYSTEMS IN OECD COUNTRIES UNITED STATES

Revenue Operational Manual. 15.2A.05 High Income Individuals Restriction. Tax Year 2010 onwards

Professional Level Options Module, Paper P6 (UK) 1 Kantar. Notes for meeting

Rates of Tax 2013/14 Resident Individuals

Professional Level Options Module, Paper P6 (UK) 1 Jodie

16. Tax on Lifetime Gifts

The purchase of the Aquapower business corporation tax liabilities NewCo Ltd purchases the business Epon Ltd Wahzah Ltd Yoko Ltd NewCo Ltd

Pension savings tax charges on any excess over the Lifetime Allowance and the Annual Allowance, and on unauthorised payments

A Comprehensive Guide to Capital Gains Tax

Worldwide personal tax guide Japan. Local information National Income Tax Rates Taxable Income Band National Income Tax Rates

The starting rate of tax for savings. Bulletin and FAQs 19 March 2014

International Tax information for customers Client Guide

A Brief Guide to Personal Assessment. Whether Tax may be Reduced through Election for Personal Assessment

ST. JAMES S PLACE INTERNATIONAL INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT BOND

A 5.5% solidarity surcharge is imposed on the income tax liability of all taxpayers.

Pension Taxation Issues. 2. This paper deals with a number of topical issues in the general area of pension taxation.

PAYE / PRSI for Small Employers

tes for Guidance Taxes Consolidation Act 1997 Finance Act 2014 Edition - Part 13

Income Levy. Frequently Asked Questions

ANNEX B-2: Research and Development (R&D) Tax Measures

CHAPTER 4 - TAX PREFERENCES FOR SUPERANNUATION AND LIFE INSURANCE SAVINGS

Foreign Tax Credit Relief: capital gains

Human Resources. Employee Payroll FAQ

CHAPTER 34 DOUBLE TAX RELIEF FOR CGT

Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) versus Limited Company

Retirement Annuity Contract & Self-Invested Personal Pension ( SIPP ) Company. Guidance Notes & Key Features

Tax Effective Cross-Border Will Planning

Partnerships review: limited liability partnerships: treatment of salaried members

Q1. Why is it necessary for me to complete a new Employee s Withholding Allowance Certificate for tax year 2014?

STAMP DUTY LAND TAX BILL

Ready Reckoner - Post Budget 2016

By Edward L. Perkins, JD, LLM. CPE CREDIT Hour of Interactive Self-Study

TAXATION OF INCOME FROM PROPERTY TAX YEAR 2013(1 st July 2012 TO 30 th June 2013) (SECTIONS 15, 16, 155 & 169)

tes for Guidance Taxes Consolidation Act 1997 Finance Act 2014 Edition - Part 8

Trusts and settlements income treated as the settlor's

2015 No INCOME TAX. The Scottish Rate of Income Tax (Consequential Amendments) Order 2015

Provinces and territories also impose income taxes on individuals in addition to federal taxes

FEDERAL BUDGET 2009 SUMMARY

NEW JERSEY ANGEL INVESTOR TAX CREDIT FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQ)

Tax Planning in an Economic Downturn

SUPPLEMENTARY RETIREMENT SCHEME (SRS)

CHAPTER 3 INCOME TAX ON DISCRETIONARY TRUSTS

Top 10 Tax Considerations for U.S. Citizens Living in Canada

The Expatriate Financial Guide to

Taxation of Non-Resident Landlords

Tax reform Q3.qxd 8/3/10 09:51 Page 1 22 Big Picture

Taxable income band Property Interest Dividends

CALIFORNIA WITHHOLDING SCHEDULES FOR 2015

German Tax Facts. The Expatriate Financial Guide to Germany

Receita Federal do Brasil (RFB) 1 January to 31 December Last working day of April following end of tax year

ASC IRA Distribution Form

Understanding retirement income Version 5.0

INVESTMENT BOND FACTSHEET 9 SINGLE AND JOINT INVESTMENT BONDS

Income tax computation

TURKEY CORPORATE TAX (KURUMLAR VERGISI) The basic rate of corporation tax for resident and non-resident companies in Turkey is 20%.

[ ] Tax relief for new start-up companies

Accounting Standard AASB 1020 December Income Taxes. Issued by the Australian Accounting Standards Board

US Citizens Living in Canada

tes for Guidance Taxes Consolidation Act 1997 Finance Act 2015 Edition - Part 27

Income tax for individuals is computed on a monthly basis by applying the above progressive tax rates to employment income.

Submission to the Department of Finance on The Taxation of Corporate Groups

Revenue s Construction Industry Project. 1.0 Registration with Revenue as a principal contractor.

Preamble A. Where services are performed wholly in one jurisdiction section 11(1)(a) Ruling B. Where services are performed in more than

SUPPLEMENTARY RETIREMENT SCHEME (SRS)

FOR ELECTRONIC USE ONLY

DEPARTMENTAL INTERPRETATION AND PRACTICE NOTES NO. 23 (REVISED) RECOGNIZED RETIREMENT SCHEMES

Medicare levy variation declaration

Potential saving ( 286, ,040) 64,960

GIFT TRUST (CREATING FIXED TRUST INTERESTS) ESTATE PLANNING WITH THE GIFT TRUST

Employee and Business Angel Shareholdings. Avoiding Income Tax Issues

Marginal and absorption costing

KEY GUIDE. Drawing profits from a company

Information Regarding U.S. Federal Income Tax Calculations in connection with the Acquisition of DIRECTV by AT&T

Arrangement between the Mainland of China and the HKSAR for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion

31 October (paper filing) 31 January (Electronic Filing)

PRE-BUDGET REPORT: REVIEW OF CHARITY TAXATION

Tel: Fax: ey.com Ticaret Sicil No : Mersis No:

Life Assurance Policies

HM REVENUE & CUSTOMS. Child and Working Tax Credits. Error and fraud statistics

tes for Guidance Taxes Consolidation Act 1997 Finance Act 2015 Edition - Part 12

Roth Individual Retirement Account Disclosure Statement (Pursuant to Treasury Regulation )

THE HONG KONG INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED SECRETARIES. Suggested Answers

[ ] Revenue Job Assist

Research and Development (R&D) Relief for Corporation Tax

NHS Pension Scheme: Lifetime Allowance Charge (LTAC)

Professional Services Withholding Tax (PSWT) General Instructions

Social Security. Social Security Payments and the Taxation System. Technical Series Number One

CGT is a tax on the profit you make from selling certain assets such as property, shares or other investments e.g. antiques and fine art.

DECEMBER 2014 AUTUMN STATEMENT

Transcription:

TSG 06/19 Number of income earners who actually pay income tax at the higher rate A paper prepared in Revenue is attached for the information of the TSG. The paper suggests that some persons classified as higher tax rate taxpayers may, because of the action in their favour of the application of tax credits, in fact have an overall tax of only 20%. Thus, very many 42% taxpayers effectively pay tax at a much lower rate arguably at 20% - albeit that there is a 42% charge on their marginal earnings. The question arises whether this presentation of the facts will be of assistance in explaining the impact of the tax system to members of the public. On the one hand The actual tax paid does not exceed the amount payable at the standard rate. The liability to pay tax at 42% is arguably notional rather than real in many cases, and there is therefore an overestimate in many people s minds as to the prevailing tax levels. However Tax is actually calculated at the marginal rate of 42% before the credit applies, and The credit and allowance systems are not directly comparable. The credit is independent of the rate of tax; it is a tax relief to which taxpayers are entitled (and which will reduce their net liability) regardless of the rate at which their gross liability is calculated; and it may therefore be overstating the case to treat tax credits as effectively covering the 42% tax calculated for c.250,00 taxpayers. 1

Number of income earners who actually pay income tax at the higher rate 1. Summary 1.1 An objective of An Agreed Programme for Government is to ensure that 80% of all earners pay tax only at the standard rate. 1.2 Moving from tax-free allowances to tax credits as the principal mechanism for delivering the basic personal reliefs from income tax may have obscured progress made towards that objective of ensuring that 80% of all earners pay tax only at the standard rate: Tax-free allowances worked by reducing the amount of taxpayers income charged to tax, thereby increasing the number of taxpayers with no liability at the higher rate. In delivering tax relief of equal value, the tax credit system allows a greater amount of income to be charged which initially produces additional liability, including liability at the higher rate. This additional gross liability to tax is then reduced or eliminated, in net liability and payment terms, by set-off of the tax credits. 1.3 Figures, as currently presented, focus on gross liability at the higher rate although the net charge may not exceed 20%. A fuller picture (arguably, more accurately reflecting the terms of the Government objective) might be provided if, in addition, figures could also be presented showing those earners whose liability to tax at the higher rate is fully offset by deductible tax credits as earners who actually pay tax only at the standard rate. 1.4 For 2007, before Budget changes, this would mean that o while 65.3% of income earners would be shown as having liability only at the standard rate, o the percentage of earners shown as paying tax only at standard rate would increase to 76.8%. 2

2. For how many income earners is liability to income tax at the higher rate fully offset by their personal tax credits? 2.1 An Agreed Programme for Government With regard to taxation, An Agreed Programme for Government states: The parties remain committed to the achievement of the taxation objectives set out in Action Programme for the Millennium. Over the next five years our priorities with regard to personal taxation will be: o to achieve a position where all those on the national minimum wage are removed from the tax net, and o to ensure that 80% of all earners pay tax only at the standard rate, o to use the potential of the tax credit system to effectively target changes and to pursue further improvements in the income tax regime if economic resources permit. The move to tax credits in place of tax-free allowances, as a means of giving personal reliefs from income tax has, arguably, had the effect of obscuring progress made on the second objective above, i.e. to ensure that 80% of all earners pay tax only at the standard rate. Tax-free allowances worked by reducing the amount of a taxpayer s income charged to tax, thereby increasing the number of taxpayers with no liability at the higher rate. In delivering tax relief of equal value, the tax credit system first allows a greater amount of the taxpayer s income to be charged - which produces additional liability, including liability at the higher rate. This additional gross liability is then reduced or eliminated in net liability and payment terms by set-off of the tax credits. Appendix 1 sets out an example of both the allowance and tax credit approaches. 2.2 Numbers as currently presented Based on the latest historical data on incomes (2003) as projected forward to 2006 income levels and numbers at work, an estimated 31.7% of income earners (683,700 out of a total of 2,160,500 earners) are liable to income tax at the higher rate for 2006. The corresponding projected figure for 2007 on a pre-budget basis is that 34.7 % of income earners are liable to tax at the higher rate (768,200 out of a total of 2,214,700 earners) and, accordingly, that 65.3% are liable only at the standard rate. 2.3 Allowances system of basic personal tax reliefs In the operation of the personal allowance or tax-free allowance system (which applied before the introduction of standard-rated relief and, then, personal tax credits), taxable income, i.e. the income actually charged to tax whether at the standard rate or the higher rate, was arrived at after deduction of the personal allowances. In the personal allowances system, budgetary increases in (1) personal allowances and (2) the standard rate bands both had the effect of slowing down the movement (due to annual income increases) of income earners into higher rate tax. This was the case because personal allowances ensured that a specified amount of income was neither chargeable to tax at the standard rate nor at the higher rate, i.e. income up to the amount of the personal or tax-free allowances was not charged to tax at all. The effect of the standard rate band was to specify a further amount of income that was only to be charged at the standard rate. Under the allowances system, therefore, personal allowances and the standard rate band had the same effect as respects the charge at the higher rate they prevented it. Accordingly, it was the aggregate value of personal allowances and standard rate band that determined the point in a person s income at which the higher rate of tax first applied. 3

In summary, as respects preventing income being charged at the higher rate, (1) personal or tax-free allowances and the standard rate band had the same effect and (2) an amount equal to the sum of the personal allowance added to the rate band was protected from the higher rate charge. 2.4 Tax credits system of basic personal tax reliefs Under a tax credits system, however, only increases to the standard rate band can obviously achieve the effect of taking the higher rate out of play. This is because tax credits give relief by reducing the tax payable rather than by reducing the amount of income ( taxable income ) on which tax is charged at the standard and higher rates. The figure for taxable income is increased by the amount of income previously covered by allowances. The tax credits are deducted from the tax charged on that increased income rather than from the income itself. The significance of this for present purposes is that, under the current tax credits system, income earners who have the higher rate tax charged on their income reduced to Nil by set-off of their personal tax credits are, nonetheless, included in the statistics as higher rate taxpayers. While the significant increases in personal and PAYE tax credits over successive Budgets have reduced individual income tax bills significantly, providing relief by tax credits rather than tax-free allowances has also conveyed the contrary impression of an increasing percentage of income earners paying tax at the higher rate. 1 2.5 In addition to data as currently presented, should numbers also be presented by reference to higher rate tax that, after set-off of personal tax credits, is actually paid? In measuring the progress towards the objective of ensuring that 80% of income earners pay tax only at the standard rate it is not unreasonable to regard earners o who have had an amount of tax calculated at 42% o but for whom that amount is less than, and fully covered by, the personal tax credits that are deducted in arriving at the tax they actually have to pay, as actually paying their tax only at the standard rate, rather than at the higher rate as well. 2 2.6 What would the revised numbers be? An estimate has been made of the numbers of income earners whose taxable income falls between o the limit of their standard rate band and o the amount of income up to which higher rate tax is fully offset by their main personal tax credits (which include the employee credit in the case of PAYE earners). This estimate shows that some 254,531 income earners 3, or 11.5% of all income earners on tax records, are in this position of having sufficient tax credits to offset any liability they have at the higher rate. Excluding these from the higher rate numbers would mean that the estimated proportion of income earners for 2007, before any Budget changes, who pay some tax at the higher rate would be confined to 23.2% of all income earners. On that basis, before any Budget changes, 76.8% of all 2007 earners will pay tax only at the standard rate. 1 There is no dispute that taxpayers with standard rate liability that is fully covered by tax credits should be categorized as exempt (or in the words of An Agreed Programme for Government removed from the tax net ) rather than as being liable to tax at the standard rate. While the percentage of income earners classified as exempt has grown due to increases in tax credits, the effect of those credits in also eliminating higher rate tax liabilities is not similarly acknowledged. 2 In an equivalent allowances-based system these taxpayers would have paid exactly the same amount of tax but none of it at the higher rate. 3 A married couple who have elected or have been deemed to have elected for joint assessment is counted as one tax unit. 4

Appendix 1 Effect of equal relief being delivered by (1) Tax Credit and (2) Tax-free Allowance (1) Tax Credit Taxable Income 35,880 Tax 32,000 @ 20% = 6,400 3,880 @ 42% = 1,629 Gross Liability 8,029 Less Tax Credit 1,630 Net Liability/Payment due 6,399 Despite the charge at the higher rate the tax paid is less than the standard rate tax of 6,400. (2) Tax-free Allowance [A tax credit of 1,630 is equivalent to a tax-free allowance (deductible from income that would otherwise be charged at 42%) of 1,630 x 100/42 = 3,880.] Income 35,880 Less Tax-free Allowance 3,880 Taxable Income 32,000 Tax 32,000 @ 20% = 6,400 NIL @ 42% = NIL Net Liability/Payment due 6,400 There is no charge at the higher rate and the same net tax is paid as in the tax credit system example above. Although both taxpayers get the same relief from income tax and pay no more than standard rate tax, currently the tax credits taxpayer is regarded as a higher rate taxpayer. 5

Numbers Appendix 2 pre-budget 2007 (base 2003) SINGLE WIDOWED MARRIED 1E MARRIED 2E TOTAL PAYE 141,965 5,649 38,485 46,292 232,391 SCHEDULE D 6,558 880 7,052 7,650 22,140 ALL 148,523 6,529 45,537 53,942 254,531 These are the numbers of income earners whose taxable income falls between o the limit of their standard rate band and o the point of income at which their tax at the 42% rate would be offset by their basic personal tax credits (which include the employee credit in the case of PAYE earners) The limits of standard rate bands and relevant income points are as follows: Marital Status Limit of Standard Band Income Limit at which 42% tax is offset by credits Single PAYE 32,000 39,429 Widowed PAYE 32,000 40,619 M1E PAYE 41,000 52,310 M2E PAYE 64,000 78,857 Single SCH.D 32,000 35,881 Widowed SCH. D 32,000 37,071 M1E SCH. D 41,000 48,762 M2E SCH. D 64,000 71,762 6

Appendix 2A Calculation of the amount of income up to which higher rate tax is fully offset by basic personal tax credits Marital Status Limit of Standard Band Calculation of amount of income up to which 42% tax is offset by credits Single PAYE 32,000 32,000 + [(1,630 + 1,490) x 100/42] = 39,429 Widowed PAYE 32,000 32,000 + [(2,130 + 1,490) x 100/42] = 40,619 M1E PAYE 41,000 41,000 + [(3,260 + 1,490) x 100/42] = 52,310 M2E PAYE 64,000 64,000 + [(3,260 + (1,490 x 2)) x 100/42] = 78,857 Single SCH.D 32,000 32,000 + [1,630 x 100/42] = 35,881 Widowed SCH. D 32,000 32,000 + [2,130 x 100/42] = 37,071 M1E SCH. D 41,000 41,000 + [3,260 x 100/42] = 48,762 M2E SCH. D 64,000 64,000 + [3,260 x 100/42] = 71,762 7