Colorado Legislative Council Staff Fiscal Note STATE and LOCAL FISCAL IMPACT. Date: Bill Status: Fiscal Analyst:



Similar documents
First Regular Session Seventieth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED SENATE SPONSORSHIP

First Regular Session Sixty-ninth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED HOUSE SPONSORSHIP SENATE SPONSORSHIP

OF MULTIPLE TRAFFIC OFFENSES INVOLVING ALCOHOL OR DRUGS, AND MAKING AN APPROPRIATION THEREFOR.

Driving under the influence driving while impaired driving with excessive alcoholic content definitions penalties.

CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT BRIEF HOUSE BILL NO. 2055

First Regular Session Sixty-ninth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED SENATE SPONSORSHIP

ILLINOIS STATE PROFILE

Vermont Legislative Council

SECTION I: GENERAL INFORMATION {Indicate if analysis is on an original bill, amendment, substitute or a correction of a previous bill}

DUI HANDBOOK. Driving Under the Influence in Pennsylvania. The Martin Law Firm, P.C.

Chapter 813. Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants 2013 EDITION. Title 59 Page 307 (2013 Edition)

LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Sixty-third Legislature First Regular Session IN THE SENATE SENATE BILL NO. 1026

Iowa Legislative Fiscal Bureau. Impact of Changing Iowa's Operating While Intoxicated (OWI) Statute

PENALTIES AND FINES FOR ALCOHOL AND DRUG RELATED DRIVING OFFENSES IN NEW YORK STATE

2014 Changes in DUI Law

The High Cost of DWI. Ignition interlock license available

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session Legislative Fiscal Note

ALABAMA s FELONY DUI STATUTE- A HISTORY. [This document was originally prepared by AOC and was later revised and updated by Patrick Mahaney.

Maryland Courts, Criminal Justice, and Civil Matters

SECTION I: GENERAL INFORMATION {Indicate if analysis is on an original bill, amendment, substitute or a correction of a previous bill}

STATE OF OKLAHOMA. 1st Session of the 49th Legislature (2003) COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE

STORAGE NAME: h0151.wfm DATE: October 1, 1999 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COMMITTEE ON CRIME AND PUNISHMENT ANALYSIS BILL #: HB 151

Issue Current Law House Bill Senate Bill Mandatory

York County DUI Prevention Initiative

Criminal Justice 101. The Criminal Justice System in Colorado and the Impact on Individuals with Mental Illness. April 2009

Senate Bill No. 86 Committee on Transportation and Homeland Security

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ STREET ADDRESS: MAILING ADDRESS: CITY AND ZIP CODE: BRANCH NAME:

I. FIRST DUI OFFENSE VEHICLE CODE 23152

Issue Brief. Arizona State Senate. ARIZONA DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI): DUI Laws and DUI Courts INTRODUCTION DUI, EXTREME DUI AND AGGRAVATED DUI

Pennsylvania DUI Handbook

(1) Sex offenders who have been convicted of: * * * an attempt to commit any offense listed in this subdivision. (a)(1). * * *

Your Criminal Justice System

Colorado Legislative Council Staff

Supreme Court of Virginia CHART OF ALLOWANCES

Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Local Rules 33.0 ASSIGNMENT AND COMPENSATION OF COUNSEL TO DEFEND

About D.U.I. (Driving Under the Influence) Published by The Alaska Court System PUB-11 (6/13)(green)

ACT 24 OF 2003: DRIVING AFTER IMBIBING ALCOHOL OR USING DRUGS

SENATE BILL No. 123 page 2

It s a Privilege to Drive: Snapshot of Impaired Driving in Montana

Second Regular Session Sixty-eighth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED

GUIDE TO THE DUI INTEGRATED TREATMENT COURT FOR LAWYERS (DITC)

MONROE COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER MONROE COUNTY COURTHOUSE 610 MONROE STREET, SUITE 21 STROUDSBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 18360

At A Glance. Contact. Two Year State Budget: $122 million - General Fund

Part 3 Counsel for Indigents

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:

SUPPLEMENTAL NOTE ON SENATE BILL NO. 375

LANCASTER COUNTY ADULT DRUG COURT

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2009 Session

Alabama Rules of Criminal Procedure. Rule 26. Judgment; presentence report; sentence hearing; sentence.

SECOND CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT BRIEF HOUSE SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE BILL NO. 35

PRETRIAL DUI DIVERSION INFORMATION SHEET

Denver Sobriety Court Program Memorandum of Agreement

PUBLIC DRUNKENNESS Section 5505 of the Pennsylvania Crimes Code (Title 18)

AN ACT. The goals of the alcohol and drug treatment divisions created under this Chapter include the following:

Second Regular Session Sixty-ninth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED HOUSE SPONSORSHIP SENATE SPONSORSHIP

64th Legislature AN ACT GENERALLY REVISING LAWS REGARDING SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION; REQUIRING THE

First Regular Session Seventieth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED SENATE SPONSORSHIP

GETTING THROUGH THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM

UNDERSTANDING THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM Anne Benson

THE BIANCHI LAW FIRM 605 Thomas Street Seattle, WA WASHINGTON DRINKING & DRIVING PENALTIES AS OF JANUARY 1, 2014

First Regular Session Sixty-ninth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED HOUSE SPONSORSHIP

THE BIANCHI LAW FIRM 605 Thomas Street Seattle, WA WASHINGTON DRINKING & DRIVING PENALTIES AS OF DECEMBER 6, 2012

DELAWARE STATE PROFILE

2015 LEGISLATIVE UPDATE. Utah Sentencing Commission Jennifer Valencia, Director Office (801) Cell (801)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE DIVISION. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) ) v. ) No. ) (Judge ) ) )

Preprinted Logo will go here

COLORADO DUI AND DUID LAW WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW WHEN CHARGED. A White Paper Presented By

OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY

FY13 Actual FY14 Budget FY15 Budget

IN THE MUNICIPAL COURT OF THE CITY OF SEATTLE

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:

Driving under the influence of alcohol, drugs, or other intoxicating substances;

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF IMPERIAL. People v. Case No. Advisement of Rights, Waiver, and Plea Form

TYPE OF OFFENSE(S) AND SECTION NUMBER(S) LIST OFFENSE(S), CASE NUMBER(S) AND DATE(S) CASE NUMBER(S) AND DATE(S)

Proposition 5. Nonviolent Offenders. Sentencing, Parole and Rehabilitation. Statute.


THE BIANCHI LAW FIRM TH AVE NE BELLEVUE, WA WASHINGTON DRINKING & DRIVING PENALTIES AS OF JANUARY 1, 2014

Your Guide to Illinois Traffic Courts

PROBATION LENGTH AND CONDITIONS IN KANSAS

Orange County, Texas Adult Criminal Justice Data Sheet

CITY OF SALINA MUNICIPAL COURT DIVERSION INFORMATION AND APPLICATION

Youth and the Law. Presented by The Crime Prevention Unit

DUI (Driving Under the Influence)

VIRGINIA DUI FACTSHEET

The A-B-C s (without singing) of DUI offenses

DUI. The funds received under the provisions of this subsection shall be distributed as follows:

PROPOSAL. Expansion of Drug Treatment Diversion Programs. December 18, 2007

Introduction. 1 P age

Alabama s Revised DUI Law Effective July 1, Patrick Mahaney Montgomery, Alabama

I just got arrested for a State of South Carolina DUI charge. What happens now?

[As Amended by Senate Committee of the Whole] SENATE BILL No By Joint Committee on Corrections and Juvenile Justice Oversight 1-11

An Analysis of Idaho s Kootenai County DUI Court

General District Courts

DUI & APC 47 O.S Amended by Swezey Act & McGee Act There will be two versions of the statute come November 1.

TRIAL COURT COLLECTIONS POLICY GUIDELINES TABLE OF CONTENTS

(S.1) It is hereby enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Vermont: Sec. 1. CRIMINAL OFFENSE CLASSIFICATION WORKING GROUP

Criminal Justice 101 and the Affordable Care Act. Prepared by: Colorado Criminal Justice Reform Coalition

Using Administrative Records to Report Federal Criminal Case Processing Statistics

Clarion County ARD / DUI Program ARD APPLICATION CHECKLIST

Municipal Attorney. Mayor. Municipal Attorney Administration. Administrative Hearing

Transcription:

Colorado Legislative Council Staff Fiscal Note STATE and LOCAL FISCAL IMPACT Drafting Number: Prime Sponsor(s): LLS 15-0042 Rep. Saine; McCann Sen. Cooke; Johnston Date: Bill Status: Fiscal Analyst: House Judiciary Kerry White (303-866-3469) BILL TOPIC: FELONY OFFENSE FOR REPEAT DUI OFFENDERS Fiscal Impact Summary* FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 State Revenue (Cash Funds) $0 $19,487 - $183,664 State Expenditures (General Fund)** $282,315 - $2,387,121 $2,486,789 - $7,902,874 $40,990 - $386,982 $4,693,579 - $13,419,849 FTE Position Change 2.6-22.5 FTE 3.1-27.0 FTE 3.1-27.0FTE TABOR Set-Aside $0 $19,487 - $183,664 $40,990 - $386,982 Appropriation Required: See State Appropriations section. * This summary shows changes from current law under the bill for each fiscal year. Amounts shown are in a range. ** This amount includes centrally appropriated costs, which are not included in the bill's appropriation. See the State Expenditures section for more information. Note: While all agencies were canvassed for the purposes of this fiscal note, not all agencies responded with complete information. Therefore, this fiscal note should be considered preliminary. It will be revised if new information becomes available. Summary of Legislation This bill changes the penalties for certain driving offenses. Felony driving under the influence (DUI). Under current law, a DUI, DUI per se, or DWAI (driving while ability impaired) is an unclassified misdemeanor offense. The penalty is d to a class 4 felony when any of the following circumstances apply: after three or more prior convictions of a DUI, DUI per se, or DWAI; vehicular homicide; vehicular assault; or any combination thereof (group 1 cases); or not more than seven years after the first of two prior convictions of any of the above if the new violation included at least one of the following circumstances (group 2 cases): < one or more youth under the age of 18 were present; < damage or injury to property or persons; < the offender fled the scene after the accident; or < at the time of the violation or within two hours after the violation, the offender's blood alcohol content (BAC) was 0.15 or higher. For purposes of assessing the number of convictions, the bill clarifies that convictions from other U.S. states and territories are deemed to apply if they would constitute the same offense in Colorado. The court is also required to consider whether all reasonable and appropriate alternative sentences have been exhausted and to determine that incarceration is the most suitable option before imposing a term in the Department of Corrections (DOC).

Page 2 Aggravated driving with a revoked license. The bill reduces the penalty for this offense from a class 6 felony to a class 1 misdemeanor, but requires a sentencing court to ensure that the offender spends a minimum of 60 days in county jail. The bill also repeals provisions for this offense when it is committed with a DUI, DUI per se, or DWAI as part of the same criminal episode. Restricted driving privileges. If, under current law, a driver has had his or her driving privileges revoked for certain DUI-related offenses, he or she is required to hold an interlockrestricted license for at least a year following reinstatement. This bill extends that requirement to a minimum of two years and a maximum of five years. Background Driving while under the influence occurs when a person drives a motor vehicle while under the influence of drugs, alcohol, or both. Driving while ability impaired occurs when a person drives while impaired by drugs, alcohol, or both. DUI per se occurs when a person has a BAC of 0.08 or higher at the time of driving, or within two hours of driving. Historical data and assumptions for felony DUI. In FY 2013-14, there were 24,124 DUI/DWAI cases statewide (including the Denver County Court). Of the cases filed, about 90 percent resulted in a conviction and 25 percent resulted in a jail sentence. Due to a lack of data about the timing of repeat offenses, the number of out-of-state convictions and cases involving both a charge of DUI and aggravated driving with a revoked license, and information about the recidivism rate and timing of offenses following use of an interlock device, the fiscal note presents a range of costs following two different sets of assumptions. Low range of costs. The low range of costs in the fiscal note is based on a partial survey of actual data collected by the Colorado District Attorneys' Council. Cost are calculated using the following assumptions: all DUI cases that meet the criteria of the bill (about 306) will transfer from a state county court or the Denver County Court to a district court operated by the state due to the new felony classification; a total of 211 people per year are classified as group 1 cases; a total of 95 people per year are classified as group 2 cases; 25 percent of group 1 cases will be sentenced to prison and will serve an average length of stay of 30.0 months; 50 percent of group 2 cases will have prior felonies and be sentenced to prison and will serve an average length of stay of 45.6 months; and the Office of the State Public Defender will represent 70 percent of cases. High range of costs. The high range of costs in the fiscal note is based on extrapolating self-reported data (in the Division of Behavioral Health in the Department of Human Services) among persons convicted of a DUI. Costs are calculated using the following assumptions: all DUI cases that meet the criteria of the bill (about 2,834) will transfer from a state county court or the Denver County Court to a district court operated by the state due to the new felony classification; 7.25 percent of all cases each year have three or more DUI and, as such, are classified as group 1 cases (1,749 people); 4.5 percent of cases each year meet the criteria of the narrower time frames and more serious charges and are classified as group 2 cases (1,085 cases);

Page 3 5 percent of group 1 cases will be sentenced to prison and will serve an average length of stay of 24.0 months; 15 percent of group 2 cases will be sentenced to prison and will serve an average length of stay of 30.0 months; and the Office of the State Public Defender will represent 70 percent of cases. State Revenue Tables 1 and 2 show the changes in revenue and are adjusted in the first year to reflect the bill's effective date. Revenue estimates have also been adjusted to account for indigence and payment rates of these offenders, which vary widely. The fiscal note assumes an indigence rate of 25 percent. For each year's assessed fines, 30 percent of the fine is collected in year 1 and 20 percent is collected in each year thereafter, until the fine is paid in full. Table 1 revenue calculations are based on the assumptions on the low end of the range or a total of 306 cases. Table 2 revenue calculations are based on the assumptions on the high end of the range or a total of 2,834 cases. Table 1. Revenue Change under HB 15-1043 (Low End of the Range) Fee FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 Increase Victim Assistance Fee - $85 (from $78 to $163) Denver Cases Paying Victim Assistance Fee - $163 Subtotal - $1,927 1,064 $2,991 $3,389 1,846 $5,235 $4,149 2,250 $6,399 Increase Docket Fee - $14 (from $21 to $35) Denver Cases Paying Docket Fee - $35 Subtotal - $318 228 $546 $559 396 $955 $683 482 $1,165 Probation Supervision Fee - $15,950 $34,800 $36,250 Criminal fine penalty (class 4 felony) - potential potential potential Total - $19,487 $40,990 $43,814 Table 2. Revenue Change under HB 15-1043 (High End of the Range) Fee FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 Increase Victim Assistance Fee - $85 (from $78 to $163) Denver Cases Paying Victim Assistance Fee - $163 Subtotal - $17,885 9,536 $27,421 $31,431 16,773 $48,204 $38,474 20,538 $59,012

Page 4 Table 2. Revenue Change under HB 15-1043 (High End of the Range) (Cont.) Fee FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 Increase Docket Fee - $14 (from $21 to $35) Denver Cases Paying Docket Fee - $35 Subtotal - $2,945 2,048 $4,993 $5,176 3,602 $8,778 $6,336 4,411 $10,747 Probation Supervision Fee - $151,250 $330,000 $343,750 Criminal fine penalty (class 4 felony) - potential potential potential Total - $183,664 $386,982 $413,509 Fine and fee revenue s. By increasing the penalty for certain DUI-related offenses from an unclassified misdemeanor to felonies, fine revenue is expected to. Under current law, persons convicted of three or more DUI-related offenses may receive a fine penalty of $600 to $1,500. The fine penalty for a class 4 felony is $2,000 to $500,000. Because the court has the discretion to impose a fine, and the amount of such fines varies by offender, the exact in fine revenue cannot be determined. Revenue credited to the Victim Assistance Fund will. Currently, misdemeanants pay a fee of $78. Under the bill, the fee will by $85 to a total of $163, which is the amount levied against persons who commit felonies. In Table 1, a total of 275 offenders in state courts will pay the d fee amount. Additionally, as a result of transferring to district court, 31 offenders who are currently convicted in the City and County of Denver will pay the entire $163 fee to the state. In Table 2, a total of 2,550 offenders in state courts will pay the d fee amount. Additionally, 284 offenders who are currently convicted in the City and County of Denver will pay the entire $163 fee to the state. Revenue from docket fees will also and be credited to the Judicial Stabilization Cash Fund. In county courts, this fee is $21 versus the $35 fee charged in district courts. Table 1 assumes that 275 offenders in state courts will pay an d fee of $14, and that 31 offenders who are currently convicted in the City and County of Denver will pay the full $35 to state courts. Table 2 assumes that 2,550 offenders in state courts will pay an d fee of $14, and that 284 offenders who are currently convicted in the City and County of Denver will pay the full $35 to state courts. Persons who commit felonies must be sentenced in district court, rather than in county court; therefore, offenders serving probation at the county level will now be sentenced to probation under the Judicial Department. Under the bill, offenders annually who are convicted of DUI, DWAI, or DUI per se in the City and County of Denver Court System and sentenced to probation will now be served by the state. Offenders serving a probation sentence pay a $50 per month probation supervision fee. This fee will now be paid to the state, rather than to the City and County of Denver. Assuming each offender serves two years of probation, probation supervision fee revenue will. Table 1 assumes 29 offenders will pay this revenue to the state and Table 2 assumes 275 offenders will pay this revenue to the state.

Page 5 TABOR Impact This bill s state revenue from fines, which will the amount of revenue required to be refunded under TABOR. State Expenditures Overall, this bill will state expenditures by between $282,315 and 2.6 FTE and $2,387,121 and 22.5 FTE in FY 2015-16, by between $2,486,789 and 3.1 FTE and $7,902,874 and 27.0 FTE in FY 2016-17, and by between $4,693,579 and 3.1 FTE and $13,419,849 and 27.0 FTE in FY 2017-18. All costs in the first year have been prorated to reflect the bill's effective date and the General Fund paydate shift. Costs assuming the low end of the range are shown in Table 3 and costs assuming the high end of the range in Table 4. A discussion of the cost components for the Judicial Department and Office of the State Public Defender follows. Costs for the Department of Corrections are shown in Tables 5 and 6. It should be noted that these costs are based on preliminary assumptions from incomplete data. The fiscal note assumes that all agencies affected by will be required to make adjustments through the annual budget process. Table 3. Expenditures under HB 15-1043 (Low End of the Range) Cost Components FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT $235,210 $229,933 $229,933 Personal Services $157,855 $188,834 $188,834 FTE 2.1 2.5 2.5 Operating Expenses and Capital Outlay Costs 48,162 4,750 4,750 Centrally Appropriated Costs* 29,193 36,349 36,349 OFFICE OF THE STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER $47,105 $50,066 $50,066 Personal Services 26,894 33,101 33,101 FTE 0.5 0.6 0.6 Operating Expenses and Capital Outlay Costs 5,178 570 570 Centrally Appropriated Costs* 14,843 16,395 16,395 Department of Corrections (See Table 5) $0 $2,206,790 $4,413,580 TOTAL TOTAL FTE $282,315 2.6 FTE * Centrally appropriated costs are not included in the bill's appropriation. $2,486,789 3.1 FTE $4,693,579 3.1 FTE

Page 6 Table 4. Expenditures under HB 15-1043 (High End of the Range) Cost Components FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT $1,978,369 $1,936,567 $1,936,567 Personal Services $1,326,415 $1,589,286 $1,589,286 FTE 17.7 21.2 21.2 Operating Expenses and Capital Outlay Costs 406,219 40,090 40,090 Centrally Appropriated Costs* 245,735 307,191 307,191 OFFICE OF THE STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER $408,752 $449,332 $449,332 Personal Services 263,801 317,589 317,589 FTE 4.8 5.8 5.8 Operating Expenses and Capital Outlay Costs 32,778 5,510 5,510 Centrally Appropriated Costs* 111,470 52,452 52,452 Department of Corrections (See Table 6) $0 $5,516,975 $11,033,950 TOTAL TOTAL FTE $2,387,121 22.5 FTE $7,902,874 27.0 FTE $13,419,849 27.0 FTE Judicial Department Trial courts. The bill changes the crime classification for certain DUI-related offenses from misdemeanors to felonies and results in between 306 and 2,834 felony cases that must be heard at the district court level. Felony cases require more complex case processing than misdemeanor cases, and an in jury trials and hearings can also be expected as defendants are now facing the possibility of being sentenced to the DOC. Additionally, the bill impacts the amount of time that a court must spend at a sentencing hearing to review information related to a defendant's prior treatment history, treatment options, and risk level and to determine if incarceration is the most suitable option given the facts and circumstances of each case. Beginning in FY 2015-16, the Judicial Department will be required to add new staff at the district court level to accommodate the d workload described above. For each new magistrate, a corresponding 1.0 FTE division clerk, 1.0 FTE court reporter, and 1.0 FTE law clerk is required. Judicial Department Probation Division Offender supervision. Probation staff will be required to accommodate approximately 29-275 offenders that will be served by the Judicial Department instead of the City and County of Denver. It is assumed that offenders will serve two years on probation. Office of the State Public Defender (OSPD). The OSPD will experience d workload under the bill to provide representation to approximately 70 percent of felony cases. The fiscal note assumes that 1.0 FTE attorney at the current misdemeanor level can process 248 cases per year, but only 170 cases at the felony level. Investigator, administrative staff, standard capital outlay, ongoing standard operating and leased space costs are also provided. Office of the Alternate Defense Counsel. The ADC represents clients that are indigent when the OSPD has a conflict in representing the client, and therefore may incur costs under the bill. These costs have not been estimated, but are anticipated to be minimal.

Page 7 Five-Year Fiscal Impact on Correctional Facilities Current law prohibits the General Assembly from passing any bill to periods of imprisonment in state correctional facilities without appropriating an amount sufficient to cover the d capital construction and operating costs of the bill in each of the first five fiscal years. However, current law also allows the DOC to place offenders classified as medium custody and below in private contract prisons, for which no state capital construction costs are incurred. Offenders sentenced under this bill to the DOC may be placed in either a state-run or a private contract prison, depending on several factors. Any offenders that must be housed in a state-run prison will likely require a shift of other inmates in that facility to private contract prisons. Therefore, this fiscal note assumes that the impact of this bill will be accommodated through the use of private contract prisons, and that no new capital construction funds are necessary. Offenders placed in a private contract prison cost the state about $60.46 per offender per day, including the current daily rate of $55.08 and an estimated $5.38 per offender per day for medical care provided by the DOC. No impact is expected in the first year because of the estimated time for criminal filing, trial, disposition, and sentencing. Table 5 shows prison costs for cases at the low end of the range. Table 6 shows prison costs for cases at the high end of the range. Table 5. Five-Year Fiscal Impact On Correctional Facilities Low End of the Range Fiscal Year Inmate Bed Impact Construction Cost Operating Cost Total Cost FY 2015-16 0.0 $0 $0 $0 FY 2016-17 100.0 $0 $2,206,790 $2,206,790 FY 2017-18 200.0 $0 $4,413,580 $4,413,580 FY 2018-19 273.5 $0 $6,035,571 $6,035,571 FY 2019-20 311.1 $0 $6,865,324 $6,865,324 Total $19,521,264 $19,521,264 Table 6. Five-Year Fiscal Impact On Correctional Facilities High End of the Range Fiscal Year Inmate Bed Impact Construction Cost Operating Cost Total Cost FY 2015-16 0.0 $0 $0 $0 FY 2016-17 250.0 $0 $5,516,975 $5,516,975 FY 2017-18 500.0 $0 $11,033,950 $11,033,950 FY 2018-19 581.5 $0 $12,832,484 $12,832,484 FY 2019-20 581.5 $0 $12,832,484 $12,832,484 Total $42,215,893 $42,215,893

Page 8 Local Government Impact This bill affects local governments in several ways. First, it transfers some DUI cases from the separately administered and funded Denver County Court to the state managed Denver District Court. This will reduce revenue and costs for the Denver County Court in these cases. By increasing the penalty for these cases from a misdemeanor to a felony, workload and costs for district attorneys will. These amounts have not been estimated as of this writing. Second, the bill transfers some cases of aggravated driving with a revoked license from Denver district court to Denver County Court. This will revenue and costs for the Denver County Court in these cases. Third, by decreasing the penalty for cases of aggravated driving with a revoked license from a class 6 felony to a class 1 misdemeanor, workload and costs will also decrease for district attorneys. This bill requires that these cases receive a minimum sentence of 60 days in a county jail. It is not known how many of the existing cases this bill applies to or already receive a sentence to jail and therefore, the in local jail costs has not been estimated. For informational purposes, the cost to house an offender in county jails varies from about $53 to $114 per day. For the current fiscal year, the state reimburses county jails at a daily rate of $52.74 to house state inmates. Comparable Crime Pursuant to Section 2-2-322 (2.5), C.R.S., Legislative Council Staff is required to include certain information in the fiscal note for any bill that creates a new crime, changes the classification of an existing crime, or changes an element of the existing crime that creates a new factual basis for the offense. Please refer to the Background section above for information about the prevalence of existing offenses. As of this writing, no information about the gender or minority status of victims is available. Effective Date The bill takes effect and applies to offenses committed on or after August 5, 2015, if the General Assembly adjourns on May 6, 2015, as scheduled, and no referendum petition is filed. State Appropriations For FY 2015-16, assuming the high end of the range, the bill requires the following new appropriations: $1,732,634 General Fund to the Judicial Department and an allocation of 17.7 FTE; $297,282 General Fund to the Office of the State Public Defender and an allocation of 4.8 FTE; and a five-year General Fund appropriation of $42,215,893 to the Department of Corrections as shown in Table 6, above.

Page 9 State and Local Government Contacts Corrections Counties District Attorneys Human Services Judicial Law Municipalities Public Safety Revenue Sheriffs