The Who, What, When, Where, Why, And How Of Implementing An Effective Corrective Action, Preventive Action (CAPA) Process



Similar documents
White paper. Corrective action: The closed-loop system

Effective Root Cause Analysis For Corrective and Preventive Action

The Benefits of PLM-based CAPA Software

Corrective and Preventive Actions

Auditing HACCP Programs

GxP Process Management Software. White Paper: Ten Most Common Reasons for FDA 483 Observations and Warning Letter Citations

ISO 9001 Quality Management Systems Professional

Aerospace Guidance Document

CAPA Common Pitfalls. Sue Jacobs sue@qmsconsultant.com. Presented by: QMS Consulting, Inc.

Training As a Root Cause

CAPA Issues and Pitfalls

HONG KONG ENVIRONMENTAL ELECTRICAL APPLIANCE COMPANY. Environmental Procedure

Internal Audit Checklist

Mapping Your Success Top Non-Conformities Requiring a CAPA Process

EMS Example Example EMS Audit Procedure

Module 15: Nonconformance And Corrective And Preventive Action

QUALITY MANUAL ISO Quality Management System

Revision Date Author Description of change Jun13 Mark Benton Removed Admin. Manager from approval

Comparison ISO/TS (1999) to VDA 6.1 (1998)

AssurX Makes Quality & Compliance a Given Not Just a Goal

Process Mapping and Process- Based Internal Audits

ISO 9001:2008 Requirements Explained - An Adobe PDF File for Use on a Network System

Competency Unit: Exemplar Global AU Management Systems Auditing

Chapter 2 ISO 9001:2008 QMS

Edwin Lindsay Principal Consultant. Compliance Solutions (Life Sciences) Ltd, Tel: + 44 (0) elindsay@blueyonder.co.

Contents. Management Policy Manual SEM USA Page 2 of 12

SNAP-ON INCORPORATED QUALITY FORWARD SYSTEM MANUAL OF PRACTICE

ICH guideline Q10 on pharmaceutical quality system

Good practice: Application of EN ISO (management system)

CAPA Essentials Root Cause Analysis Tools and Techniques

CORPORATE QUALITY MANUAL

ISO 9001 Quality Systems Manual

Leveraging Enterprise Systems for Efficient Quality Management and Regulatory Compliance

PHARMACEUTICAL QUALITY SYSTEM Q10

Quality Manual TABLE OF CONTENTS APPROVAL SIGNATURE PAGE AMENDMENT RECORD SCOPE EXCLUSIONS 2.1 3

FMEA and HACCP: A comparison. Steve Murphy Marc Schaeffers

PPG SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT

Implementing ISO 9001

Guidance for Industry. Q10 Pharmaceutical Quality System

INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MANUAL IMS. Based on ISO 9001:2008 and ISO 14001:2004 Standards

ISO 9001:2000 AUDIT CHECKLIST

ComplianceSP TM on SharePoint. Complete Document & Process Management for Life Sciences on SharePoint 2010 & 2013

Quality Systems Manual

The Thinking Approach LEAN CONCEPTS , IL Holdings, LLC All rights reserved 1

Core Fittings C-Core and CD-Core Fittings

NEI s Quality Leadership System

ISO 9001 Quality Management Systems. Tips for Internal Auditing

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (QMS) ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST

AS9100 B to C Revision

Quality Manual. Dynamic Manufacturing 156 Armstrong Drive Freeport, PA Revision 6 Revision Date: 7/8/

Camber Quality Assurance (QA) Approach

Seminario SSFA. New Guideline on Good Pharmacovigilance Practice (GVP) Fare clic per modificare lo stile del sottotitolo dello schema

ISO 9001:2008 Audit Checklist

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Corporate

ISO 9001:2000 Gap Analysis Checklist

AUDITOR GUIDELINES. Responsibilities Supporting Inputs. Receive AAA, Sign and return to IMS with audit report. Document Review required?

Software Quality Assurance. Software Engineering: A Practitionerʼs Approach, 7/e by Roger S. Pressman

Process Safety Management Program

ISO 9001 : 2008 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AUDIT CHECK LIST INTRODUCTION

IBM asset management solutions White paper. Managing corrective and preventive action (CAPA) in a life sciences environment.

Six Sigma aims to maximise customer satisfaction and minimise defects.

Management System Procedure N 4/01/ of 14

Quality Risk Management ICH Q9 & ISO Presented by Michael Kerr 11 th November 2011

The Global Guideline for GCP Audit

ISO Registration Guidance Document

QMS - Johtaminen. Tom Ståhlberg FiHTA

ENVIRONMENTAL, HEALTH & SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS MANUAL

LEAN CERTIFICATION BODY OF KNOWLEDGE RUBRIC VERSION 3.0

Using Insight Auditing SWOT Analysis to Drive Business Excellence

MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY

Quality management systems

Procedure for Corrective Action and Non-conformities

Getting a Handle on Complaints

QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN VTS

Rev: Issue 4 Rev 4 Quality Manual AOP0101 Date: 10/07/13. Quality Manual. CBT Technology, Inc. 358 North Street Randolph, MA 02368

ISO 9001:2015 vs. ISO 9001:2008

Abu Dhabi EHSMS Regulatory Framework (AD EHSMS RF)

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (QMS) MANUAL

ISO 9001 (2000) QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ASSESSMENT REPORT SUPPLIER/ SUBCONTRACTOR

NORTH AMERICA OPERATIONS. (Fairmont and Montreal Facilities) QUALITY MANUAL. Prepared to comply with the requirements of ISO 9001:2008

ONTIC UK SUPPLIER QUALITY SURVEY

Integrated management systems Ship operating companies

Noorul Islam College of Engineering M. Sc. Software Engineering (5 yrs) IX Semester XCS592- Software Project Management

ISO 9001:2008 Quality Manual Clause 3.7.4

Establishing a Quality Assurance and Improvement Program

The Importance of Project Quality Management. What Is Project Quality? The International Organization for Standardization (ISO)

Quality Management. Abstract

ISO 9001: A Quality Manual for the Transition Period and Beyond

Quality Manual SE Morning Way Suite 102 Clackamas OR 97015

ISO 9001:2008 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES MANUAL

This Business Management System Manual is based on ISO 9001:2008 requirements

Corrective and Preventive Action Background & Examples Presented by:

The Easy and Cost Effective Way to AS9100 Certification

Unit-5 Quality Management Standards

QUALITY MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS General Requirements. Documentation Requirements. General. Quality Manual. Control of Documents

Jonathan Wilson. Sector Manager (Health & Safety)

Document subject to ISO Requirements

TRAINING TITLE: CAPA System Overview for Managers (WORK-021)

Edwin Lindsay Principal Consultant. Compliance Solutions (Life Sciences) Ltd, Tel: + 44 (0) elindsay@blueyonder.co.

Transcription:

The Who, What, When, Where, Why, And How Of Implementing An Effective Corrective Action, Preventive Action (CAPA) Process Who needs a CAPA Any organization that wishes to improve their performance and prevent making the same mistakes over and over again. Organizations that have chosen to implement a comprehensive Quality Management System. They quickly learn that implementing an effective CAPA process is fundamental to continuous improvement. Organization striving to meet ISO (International Standards Organization) standards such as ISO 13485. They are required to implement an effective CAPA process. What is a CAPA Process: Nonconformance: Corrective Action: Preventive Action: A series of actions or operations conducing to an end (Merriam Webster) A deviation from a specific procedure, standard, stated process or system requirement. Action taken to eliminate the cause of a nonconformance that has occurred, and prevent reoccurrence of the nonconformance. (In this case a nonconformance has already occurred) Action taken to eliminate the cause of a potential nonconformance and prevent the nonconformance from occurring. (In this case a nonconformance has not yet occurred) CAPA Process: Business process established and resources provided by an organization s management with the objective of systematically preventing occurrences or reoccurrences of defects within the organization s products and services.

When should a company implement a CAPA Where within the organization does the CAPA process operate? Why must you invest time and effort to implement and manage a CAPA There needs to be a sense of urgency within the organization about solving problems permanently. It is ineffective to implement a CAPA process without the minimum required resources and the necessary commitment to improving the performance of the organization. The How section of this paper will help define the necessary resources required for an effective CAPA process implementation. The CAPA process can be utilized across all functions of the organization. Management must determine the scope of implementation based on available resources and the level of commitment to change. Frequently the initial implementation is limited to business process defined by standards such as ISO 13485. The administration of the CAPA process is typically assigned to the part of the organization that acts as the change agent. The CAPA coordinator will be management s representative for implementing a culture of improvement and should have a contempt for the cycle of repeating past mistakes. Customer Perspective: Increase customer satisfaction Provide closed-loop feedback Financial Perspective: Reduce cost of rework Reduce returned material Prevent loss of revenue Process Perspective: Meet ISO 13485 Requirements: 8.5.2 Corrective Action: Action must be taken that will remove the cause of a nonconformance to prevent it from occurring again. The action taken should be appropriate to the impact of the nonconformance on the organization. 8.5.3 Preventive Action: The Action must be taken that will remove the cause of a potential nonconformance to prevent it from occurring at all. The action taken should be appropriate to the impact of the potential nonconformance. 2 Stabilize processes through systematic improvement Sustain improvement gains Learning Perspective: Avoid reinventing the wheel for every

problem Maintain history of organizational change How should a CAPA process be implemented? The following steps are necessary for an effective CAPA Process: 1. Record Potential or Actual Non-conformance 2. Assign and Manage Request 3. Investigate Root Cause 4. Design Corrective Action 5. Implement Corrective Action 6. Follow-Up on Corrective Action to Assure 7. Effectiveness 1) Record Potential or Actual Non-conformance The person observing a potential or actual non-conformance initiates the process and often is called the Requestor, because they are requesting the CAPA process be applied to the potential or actual non-conformance they have observed. The Requestor will typically provide the following information: Request or CAPA number Requestor Name: Request Date: Problem Description: 2) Assign and Manage Request The CAPA Process administrator, sometimes referred to as the CA Coordinator, ISO Representative or Management Rep will route the request to the appropriate people in the organization to assure the necessary action is taken in a timely manner. 3) Investigation and Root Cause Analysis A detailed instigation of the circumstances that created the problem is required. The elimination of the actual root cause of the problem is the only means to prevent the problem from reoccurring. Many problem solving techniques have been developed to help in this phase of the process. The most popular are: Brainstorming Process Mapping Fish Bone Analysis The Five Whys Window Analysis The investigation is typically assigned to an individual who has the skill of tapping into the expertise of the people within the organization to identify real root cause. 4) Design Corrective Action 3

Once an accurate understanding of the root cause of a problem is established, the action(s) required to prevent a reoccurrence of the problem can be determined. These actions frequently involve changing documented processes, conducting additional training, or even improving tooling, equipment or materials. Systemic problems may require changes in management policies. 5) Implement Corrective Action Installing the changes into the system in a way that assures consistent compliance to those changes is critical to avoid reoccurrences of the problem. This is where many organizations fall short. Without a consistent and controlled process, it is impossible to see a continuous improvement of outcomes, better product or services. 6) Follow-Up on Corrective Action to Assure Effectiveness Follow-Up includes confirming the corrective/preventive action has been taken and determining the effectiveness of the action taken. This critical step closes the loop on the CAPA process. If the actions taken are effective, the CAPA process is complete; if ineffective the CAPA process repeats itself. This can be done by opening a new CAPA request or continuing to managing the current CAPA request. More on How The administration of the CAPA process is critical to its effectiveness. Auditors typically report the following issues: Corrective actions closed without verifying effectiveness No due date assigned for the closure of corrective action Corrective actions not completed by the due date Management has not provided the necessary resources to properly administer the CAPA process. The most important resources are the people involved in administering and executing the process. They must have the skills, organizational credibility, knowledge and tools to perform the required task. Recommended Links The FMEA Investigator Root Cause Analysis With Corrective Action 4

5