CAUSE NO. IN THE DISTRICT COURT. Xxxxx Yyyyy Plaintiffs JUDICIAL DISTRICT. Aaaaa Bbbbb Cccccc Ddddd WHAT COUNTY, TEXAS. Defendants



Similar documents
CAUSE NO. PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION. Greg Abbott, and complains of OLD UNITED LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY ( Defendant ), and I.

SMALL CLAIMS RULES. (d) Record of Proceedings. A record shall be made of all small claims court proceedings.

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions. hb

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 87

CHAPTER 702 FORECLOSURE OF MORTGAGES, AGREEMENTS FOR DEEDS, AND STATUTORY LIENS Deficiency decree; common-law suit to recover deficiency.

NO. PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION. Plaintiff the STATE OF TEXAS, acting by and through the Attorney General of Texas,

individually and as an officer of Safety Cell, pursuant to Section 13(b) of the Federal Trade

NO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff, v. LIBERTY COUNTY, TEXAS. CVS PHARMACY, INC. Defendant. JUDICIAL DISTRICT

CHAPTER FORECLOSURE OF REAL ESTATE MORTGAGES BY ACTION

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO

Case AJC Document 1 Filed 03/01/2008 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/31/16 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DEFENDANT S ANSWER

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 07/14/14 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

MARC D. LAVIK, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : C.A. No. PC 11- : DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES, : DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, : STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, : COMPLAINT

Case 2:12-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 11/01/12 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

STATE OF INDIANA ) IN THE HOWARD COURT ) SS: COUNTY OF HOWARD ) CAUSE NO.: APPEARANCE BY ATTORNEY IN CIVIL CASE

Chapter 213. Enforcement of Texas Unemployment Compensation Act... 2 Subchapter A. General Enforcement Provisions... 2 Sec

In the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Atlanta Division

UNDERSTANDING THE COLLECTION PROCESS FOR COMMUNITY ASSOCIATIONS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Consensus of Judges on Multnomah County Court Foreclosure Panel

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION

Case4:15-cv DMR Document1 Filed09/16/15 Page1 of 11

ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

MOHAVE COUNTY JUSTICE COURT. If you want to file a SMALL CLAIMS ANSWER

Case 1:10-cv JBS -KMW Document 1 Filed 01/12/10 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Bryana Bible, SECOND AMENDED CLASS Plaintiff, Court File No. 12-cv RHK-JSM INTRODUCTION

CAUSE NO. PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION, APPLICATION FOR EX PARTE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, AND TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

v. VERIFIED ANSWER TO FORECLOSURE COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 3:11-cv RCJ-WGC Document 96 Filed 12/18/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

CHAPTER FORECLOSURE OF MORTGAGES OF REAL PROPERTY BY ADVERTISEMENT

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI

INSTRUCTIONS AND INFORMATION FOR FILING SMALL CLAIMS/DEBT CLAIMS CASES IN JUSTICE COURT

CAUSE NO. JULIE TORBERT, as next friend of IN THE DISTRICT COURT PHILIP ORMSTON V. DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS

) CIVIL NO. v. ) WORLD CLASS NETWORK, INC., ) a Nevada corporation; ) COMPLAINT FOR ) RELIEF. DANIEL R. DIMACALE, an individual; )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

SECOND AMENDED ORDER DESIGNATING ALL CASES E-FILE AND SETTING FORTH CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS IN E-FILE CASES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN THANH HOANG, individually and ) L0

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, TAMPA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DIVISION

Remedial Action in Texas: Foreclosure and Recent Litigation

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:06-cv JF-SDP Document 69 Filed 02/25/2008 Page 1 of 15

Remedial Action in Southeastern States Foreclosure in Florida

SUPREME COURT County of : State of New York VERIFIED ANSWER TO FORECLOSURE COMPLAINT. Defendant(s). Defendant answers as follows: General Denial.

2:13-cv GAD-LJM Doc # 6 Filed 04/03/13 Pg 1 of 6 Pg ID 174 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv RBW Document 21 Filed 01/29/15 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Debt Claim Petition Packet

WARM SPRINGS TRIBAL CODE CHAPTER 206 REAL PROPERTY SECURED TRANSACTIONS. Table of Contents

APPENDIX A IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 3:14-cv M Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1

Order and Temporary Injunction. Appearances of counsel are noted in the record. being duly advised in the premises, the Court makes the following:

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 9 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case 3:08-cv JAP-JJH Document 1 Filed 02/20/2008 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

How To Get A Court Order To Stop A Man From Selling A Car To A Woman

Case 1:07-cv RPM Document 1 Filed 03/20/2007 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

CAUSE NO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff LIFESTREAM PURIFICATION SYSTEMS, LLC. DALLAS COUNTY, T E X A S

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION

APPROVED Movant shall serve copies of this ORDER on

How To File A Lawsuit Against A Corporation In California

OFFICIAL COURT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

Case 5:14-cv OLG Document 9 Filed 07/31/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MONTANA EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, CASCADE COUNTY. Appearing on behalf of the Named Plaintiff and the Class were attorneys Daniel P.

How a District should respond to Bank and Mechanics Lien Foreclosures and Bankruptcy Filings

smb Doc 13 Filed 07/21/15 Entered 07/21/15 15:12:40 Main Document Pg 1 of 5 ORDER GRANTING PROVISIONAL RELIEF

2015 IL App (1st) U. No IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

A. Introduction: Preserving the Status Quo

SCREEN SPECIALISTS and RICHARD REUSCH, individually, stipulate that the ultrasound. are prescription devices as cleared for marketing by the

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Home Mortgage Foreclosures in Maine

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION. v. Case No. COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

HOW DO I GET A RESTRAINING ORDER?

11 LC ER A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 0:15-cv WJZ Document 6-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2015 Page 1 of 21

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA BIRMINGHAM DIVISION

GOODIX TECHNOLOGY INC., SHENZHEN HUIDING TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. A/K/A SHENZHEN GOODIX TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., and

COLORADO FORECLOSURE LAWS

FARM LEGAL SERIES June 2015 Foreclosure of Security Interests in Personal Property

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 4:08-cv Document 18 Filed in TXSD on 05/28/08 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

NO. PLAINTIFFS' ORIGINAL PETITION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT. Now comes, Tommy Adkisson, individually, in his official capacity as Bexar County

No CV IN THE FOR THE RAY ROBINSON,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION. CIVIL CASE NO. 1:06cv97

SSM COMPLAINT

CASE 0:12-cv RHK-TNL Document 1 Filed 09/14/12 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Transcription:

CAUSE NO. Xxxxx Yyyyy Plaintiffs V. Aaaaa Bbbbb Cccccc Ddddd Defendants IN THE DISTRICT COURT JUDICIAL DISTRICT WHAT COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION AND APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND TEMPORARY INJUNCTION TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: COMES NOW, Plaintiffs, Xxxxx and Yyyyy, who files this Petition, in the interest of justice and fairness, and for the underlying violations of the Texas Debt Collection Act, Texas Business and Commerce Code, Texas Property Code, and for a Declaratory Judgment as stated herein, and asks this Honorable Court to grant the Application for Temporary Restraining Order against Aaaaa and Bbbbb, Formerly known as Cccccc, to prevent Defendants from conducting the Substitute Trustee s Sale scheduled for Day, Month x, Year, and from otherwise selling or taking possession of the property subject of this litigation, which is incorporated by reference and fully set forth at length herein, during the pendency of this cause, and from otherwise disturbing or attempting to disturb Plaintiff s peaceable possession and enjoyment of his property, and in support shows the Court the following: DISCOVERY CONTROL PLAN LEVEL 1. Pursuant to Rule 190.1 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff intends to conduct discovery in this case under Level 3. NOT A SUBSTITUTION FOR LEGAL COUNSEL- PAGE 1

PARTIES AND SERVICE 2. Plaintiffs, Xxxxx and Yyyyy, are individuals whose mailing address is Number, Street Name, City, State, Zip code. The last three digits of Xxxxx s driver's license number is ( ), and the last three digits of Xxxxx s social security number are. 3. Defendant, Aaaaa, is a (???) Foreign For Profit Corporation who may be served by and through its registered agent Name Address, City, State, Zip code. Service of said Defendant as described above can be effected by Personal Service or Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested. 4. Defendant, Bbbbb, is a (???) Foreign Financial Institution, who may be served by Bbbbb Bank and through its registered agent Name Address, City, State, Zip code. Service of said Defendant as described above can be effected by Personal Service or Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested. 5. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 6. The subject matter in controversy is within the jurisdictional limits of this Court. 7. This Court has personal jurisdiction because the property which is the subject of this litigation is located in Texas and Defendants are doing business within this state. 8. Venue in this cause is proper in What County, Texas pursuant to Section 17.56 of the Texas Business and Commerce Code and under Section 15.001 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code because this action involves real property and the property is located in Same What County, Texas. FACTS 9. Plaintiff is the record owner of the property is located at Number, Street Name, City, State, Zip code, more specifically described as: LOT and BLOCK [Can be found on the Deed of Trust, Notice of Trustee Sale] and in DEED RECORDS OF What COUNTY, TEXAS. 10. Plaintiff requested, in writing on Date, or Dates, that the Defendants produce certified copies of any and all transfer documents showing all of the transfers and assignments of the Original Deed of Trust and the Original Note. Additionally, Plaintiff has requested that the Defendants produce the Original Note. These requests were made in order to verify that Defendants are in fact the Holder in Due Course of the note as required by Texas Law. Defendants have yet to produce such documents. It is Plaintiff s belief that NOT A SUBSTITUTION FOR LEGAL COUNSEL- PAGE 2

the Defendants do not have the authority to foreclose on the property and are in fact not the actual holders of the original note, and therefore not entitled to collect on a debt. 11. Plaintiff allegedly signed a Promissory Note in order to purchase the property located at, Number, Street Name, City, State, Zip code, on Month, Day, and Year. After requesting documents to verify the debt and Note Holder, the Defendants have refused to produce the Original Note or any other documentation. Further, Defendants have not allowed Plaintiff s to review any documentation to confirm their authenticity. 12. Plaintiff allegedly signed a Deed of Trust on Month, Day, and Year, which was allegedly recorded in the office of the County Clerk of the Deed of Trust Records of What County, Texas. Although Plaintiff has requested documents to verify that all of the transfers and assignments of the Original Deed of Trust were executed or recorded properly, the Defendants have not yet produced any such documentation. 13. Plaintiff has attempted to verify by letter and phone if Defendants are in fact the Holder in Due Course and Holder or representative of the Holder in Due Course and Holder of the Note. Plaintiff s have requested that Defendants pull the pending substitute trustee s sale until the debt is validated and the true Holder in Due Course and Holder of the Note is known. Defendants have refused to do so and in fact intend to pursue this collection action by executing the substitute trustee s sale on the date and at the location stated above. TEXAS PROPERTY CODE VIOLATION 14. Defendants failed to give proper notice because all transfers of the lien were not recorded timely as required by Texas Law prior to the acceleration and collection action on the Note. 15. Plaintiff has reason to believe that the mortgagee listed on the above referenced Notice of Foreclosure Sale is not the current Holder in Due Course and Holder of the Original Note. TEXAS BUSINESS & COMMERCE CODE VIOLATION 16. The Texas Business and Commerce Code states that only a Holder of an instrument, or a non-holder in possession of the instrument, is entitled to enforce the instrument, whether that be through enforcement of the deed of trust or any other manner. 17. A foreclosure action is merely a collection action on a negotiable instrument. Therefore, in this case, the negotiable instrument is the Original Mortgage Promissory Note. The NOT A SUBSTITUTION FOR LEGAL COUNSEL- PAGE 3

Deed of Trust is merely the instrument securing the Original Mortgage Promissory Note. Although the Texas Property Code formulates the procedure by which a deed of trust may be used as a security instrument to collect on a mortgage, the deed of trust is wholly worthless and invalid if there is no Note for it to secure. 18. Defendants have failed to produce the Original Note with all allonges, transfers and assignments affixed thereto, permanently and irremovably, as required by the Texas Business and Commerce Code. Therefore, they have not shown that they are the Holder of the Note or Holder in Due Course, and have no right to attempt to enforce such Note. TEXAS FINANCE CODE VIOLATION 19. Because Defendants have provided no evidence that they are in fact Holder in Due Course and Holder of the Note, they have no authority to collect on the Note. Defendants nonetheless have engaged in actions to collect on such Note. These actions are thereby fraudulent, deceptive, and/or misleading representations actionable under the Texas Finance Code 392.303 and 392.304, The Texas Debt Collection Act (TDCA). 20. Defendants are in violation of Texas Finance Code Sections 392.301(8), therefore having no authority to collect on the note or hold a substitute trustee s sale. 21. All alleged transfers, assignments, and misstatements of facts regarding the Note by Defendants, and the failure of Defendants to verify that they are the Holder in Due Course and Holders of the Note, constitute violations of the Texas Finance Code. DECLARATORY JUDGMENT 22. The Plaintiff requests that the court declare that any attempt to foreclose pursuant to the Texas Property Code Sec. 51.001 et seq is an action to collect a debt and therefore the Defendant must produce the one and only Original Promissory Note signed by the Plaintiffs for inspection by the Plaintiffs and or their document examiner prior to proceeding with any foreclosure proceedings. APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER NOT A SUBSTITUTION FOR LEGAL COUNSEL- PAGE 4

23. After knowledge of a possible sale, Plaintiff s have requested that Defendants produce certified copies of any and all transfer documents showing all of the transfers and assignments of the Original Deed of Trust, as well as the Original Note. Such documentation has not yet been provided to Plaintiff. 24. Unless this Honorable Court immediately restrains the Defendants from executing a Substitute Trustee s Sale or otherwise selling or taking possession of the subject property during the pendency of this cause, or from otherwise disturbing or attempting to disturb Plaintiff s peaceable possession and enjoyment of the property, Plaintiff will suffer immediate and irreparable injury, for which there is no adequate remedy at law to give Plaintiff complete, final and equal relief. More specifically, Plaintiff will show unto the court the following: a. The harm to Plaintiff is imminent because Plaintiff will lose her property. b. There is no adequate remedy at law which will give Plaintiff complete, final and equal relief if the Temporary Restraining Order is not granted and any transfer of the property is allowed to take place. c. Plaintiff is willing to post a reasonable temporary restraining order bond, and hereby requests this Honorable Court to set such bond at a reasonable amount. d. Plaintiff has met the burden by establishing each element which must be present before injunctive relief can be granted by this court, therefore Plaintiff is entitled to the requested temporary restraining order. 25. Plaintiff requests this Honorable Court to restrain the Defendants from executing the Substitute Trustee s Sale scheduled for Day, Month Date, Year or selling or otherwise taking possession of the subject property during the pendency of this cause, or from otherwise disturbing or attempting to disturb Plaintiff s peaceable possession and enjoyment of the property. 26. Plaintiff is likely to succeed on the merits of this lawsuit. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE PREMISES CONSIDERED, PLAINTIFF RESPECTFULLY REQUESTS: 27. That this Petition be filed and that a day be appointed for a hearing on this matter; 28. That notice of the filing of this Petition and the hearing date be given to all parties; 29. That a temporary restraining order will issue, restraining Defendants, NOT A SUBSTITUTION FOR LEGAL COUNSEL- PAGE 5

, Defendants officers, agents, servants, employees, and assigns, constables, sheriffs, Justices of the Peace, and attorneys from directly or indirectly from executing a Substitute Trustee s Sale or otherwise selling or taking possession of the subject property during the pendency of this cause, or from otherwise disturbing or attempting to disturb Plaintiff s peaceable possession and enjoyment of the property; 30. That the Court sets a reasonable bond for the temporary restraining order; 31. That, after notice and hearing, any and all Substitute Trustee s Sale on the above-specified property will be set aside and a temporary injunction will issue enjoining and restraining Defendants, Defendants officers, agents, servants, employees, successors and assigns, constables, sheriffs, Justices of the Peace, and attorneys from taking or selling in any fashion, or taking possession of the subject property during the pendency of this cause, or from otherwise disturbing or attempting to disturb Plaintiff's peaceable possession enjoyment of the property; 32. That, after trial on the merits, the Court permanently enjoin Defendants, Defendants officers, agents, servants, employees, successors and assigns, constables, sheriffs, Justices of the Peace, and attorneys from directly or indirectly from taking possession of the subject property or from otherwise disturbing or attempting to disturb Plaintiff s peaceable possession enjoyment of the property. 33. Economic Damages; 34. Punitive Damages; 35.A declaration that the Defendant must produce the one and only Original Promissory Note signed by the Plaintiff for inspection by the Plaintiff and or their document examiner prior to proceeding with any foreclosure proceedings; 36.A declaration that the court declare that any attempt to foreclose pursuant to the Texas Property Code Sec. 51.001 et seq is an action to collect a debt; 37. Exemplary Damages; 38. Equitable Relief; 39. Reasonable fees; 40. Costs of Court; and 41. All other relief to which Plaintiff is entitled; 42. Plaintiff prays for general relief. NOT A SUBSTITUTION FOR LEGAL COUNSEL- PAGE 6

Respectfully submitted XXXXX AND YYYYY Number, Street City, Texas Zip code Telephone Fax By: PRO SE NOT A SUBSTITUTION FOR LEGAL COUNSEL- PAGE 7