Implementing a Behavior Based Safety Process at Rockwell Automation Greater Cleveland Safety Council and the Northern Ohio ASSE Chapter August 6, 2009 Stuart J. Gock CSP HQ Manager of Safety/ Milwaukee
Decision to Pursue BBS Process Rockwell Automation has a well- established safety process Generally good level of management support, employee involvement Enjoying relatively low safety incident rates Looking for the next step improvement in the safety process Identified the BBS Process as a possible alternative Decided to investigate BBS Process GOALS: Identify and Select a BBS Partner to help implement a BBS Process Implement the BBS process at Rockwell Automation
Began by Doing Research on the BBS Process
Identified Key Factors for a Successful BBS Process An initial commitment of support needs to be made by all key players. Meticulous and consistent communications need to occur between process leaders and organizational leaders Potential barriers need to be identified and addressed in the strategic plan. Expectations need to be clear and progress toward goals needs to be regularly measured. Ownership and accountability need to be defined and reinforced at all Levels
Identified Key Factors for a Successful BBS Process Customization Fit For Purpose One size does not fit all Minimize Perception of Change Integrate into infrastructure Minimize the resistance Participation in the process needs to be growing and regularly measured. A careful separation needs to be maintained between BBS and any disciplinary measures. It has to have a review and continuous improvement process for sustainability
Developed a Behavior Based Safety (BBS) Qualifications Information Request- Company Information-Expertise/ references Personnel Company Experience Implementations Number of Implementations last three years Implementation by Industry Types Three implementations 2 years and older with Updated Incident Data
Behavior Based Safety (BBS) Qualifications Information Request- Process Information Overall Approach/ Theory Behavioral Components Training Behavior identification Approach to observation Feedback process Coaching/ reinforcement techniques Timeframes External v. Internal Training Delivery methods Information processing-tracking, reporting mechanisms Sustainability/ Continuous Improvement
Consultant/ Vendor Selection Process Request For Information Sent to Recognized BBS Vendors Selected Three for further evaluation, reference checks Chose ProAct- Lean BBS
Secured Management Support for Selected Approach
Developed Rockwell Automation BBS FOCUS Process Focused Observations Can Uncomplicate Safety
FOCUS Approach Chose an Internal consultant model to lead the effort Trained 8 individuals to be the HQ Process Experts
Developed a Step Approach Step One-Site Preparation and Site Assessment Step Two- Training and Process Kickoff Step Three- Ongoing Activities and Continual Improvement
The First Step- Site Preparation and Assessment
Results: Site Readiness Assessment- Tailored approach focusing the efforts specifically on those areas and behaviors needing improvement. The perception survey also helps identify potential barriers to a successful implementation. Management Briefing- Pareto analysis on Existing Location Incident Data Perception surveys, Focus Groups Recommendations and Area of concerns
Management Briefing-
Developed Training, Educational Materials
Step 2- Training and Process Kickoff
Strategic Plan/ Deployment Form Steering Team- The steering team members are selected based on the needs and culture at the location. In addition, they also play a key role in developing site strategy, which minimizes perceptions of change and tailors the process to the individual site. Team can be formed from existing committees/ teams
Develop the Observation Process Observer Process The steering team selects observers best suited to the behaviors and locations identified in the site assessment. Based again on the site assessment, the choice of observers could be any combination of management and floor employees. Observation Checklist- Targeted Checklist behaviors are based on actual facility data. Behaviors are limited to 4-5 items minimizing observation time, and allowing internalization of the measured behaviors. Checklists are reviewed and modified as part of regular review process.
Precaution worksheet
Tailored Checklist
Focus on Process Ownership- Approach tailored to specific issues and culture at site. Not a canned approach. Fewer observed behaviors allows for the behaviors to be internalized by the observers Accountability for both conducting observations and follow up actions (Scorecard example)
Scorecard Metrics (Measurements and Expectations) Purpose: BBS Performance Metric requirements, Supervisor scorecard integration
Process Overview
How does the BBS process get this information? Gather Insight WHAT R+ Concern Give Feedback WHY
FOCUS BBS process and principles Based on the Risk Triangle- In my opinion... In my experience I don t think it s a problem because... I ve done it before and not gotten hurt. What s wrong with it? That s the way I always do it! I don t know. I didn t think about it. It s the way we always do it around here RISK Limited/No Choice Obstacle/Barrier I can t do it any other way because... It would be difficult to do it that way because... If I do it that way, (this would happen).
FOCUS BBS process and principles How Do We Properly Address Risk-Taking? Information Reminders RISK Limited/No Choice Obstacle/Barrier Physical or Organizational Changes
Continual Improvement is built in Ongoing Steering Team Meetings at Location Process includes process review and changes, including areas targeted for observations, observation checklist changes, and effectiveness of corrective actions Quarterly Corporate Users Groups Meetings Data Review Successes, failures
Step 3- Ongoing activities
Obstacles/ Challenges Encountered Selecting the Right Approach for your company, culture Designing and Maintaining a Database for Observations Changing the perception that its only about conducting observations Site Readiness Levels Business Conditions Cultural Differences at Locations
Lessons learned Secure top senior and location management support for the effort Communicate process expectations up front before you begin to implement a site process The process kickoff can take longer than expected Communicate Successes and Activities Widely Its hard work to maintain momentum and Growth Done correctly, the process is a very positive addition to the safety effort
Results- FOCUS based approach Average 3 Year Reductions TRIR 3 Year Reductions 2.9 3 Yr Avg (Previous Baseline) 0.52 3 Yrs in Avg - (Post) 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0
A BBS Location Perspective- Rockwell Automation s Twinsburg location Truly Baird- Twinsburg FOCUS BBS Team Member
Thank You! Questions?