COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR VETERINARY USE (CVMP)



Similar documents
COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP)

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP)

End of consultation (deadline for comments) 14 October Adoption by Committee for advanced therapies 15 October 2010

POST-AUTHORISATION GUIDANCE. Human Medicinal Products

COMMITTEE FOR VETERINARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS GUIDELINE FOR THE CONDUCT OF POST-MARKETING SURVEILLANCE STUDIES OF VETERINARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS

Guidelines. of

CMDv/BPG/001. BEST PRACTICE GUIDE for Veterinary Mutual Recognition Procedure (MRP) Edition 04. Edition date: 19 July 2013

CMD(v)/GUI/014. GUIDANCE for The Processing of Generic Applications Through MRP / DCP

Questions and answers on post approval change management protocols

COMMITTEE FOR PROPRIETARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (CPMP) COMMITTEE FOR VETERINARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (CVMP)

Questions and answers on post approval change management protocols

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) GUIDELINE ON DATA MONITORING COMMITTEES

Regulatory approval routes in the European System for Medicinal Products

Marketing Authorisation: The Evaluation Process

BEST PRACTICE GUIDE for Handling of Periodic Safety Update Reports

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL

Marketing Authorization Procedures in the European Union Making the Right Choice

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP)

Official Journal of the European Union. (Acts whose publication is obligatory)

Guideline on stability testing for applications for variations to a marketing authorisation

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR VETERINARY USE (CVMP)

TRANSATLANTIC TRADE AND INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) GUIDELINE ON SIMILAR BIOLOGICAL MEDICINAL PRODUCTS

Questions & answers on signal management

ICH Topic S 1 A The Need for Carcinogenicity Studies of Pharmaceuticals. Step 5

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

PROCEDURE FOR PREPARING GCP INSPECTIONS REQUESTED BY THE EMEA. GCP Inspectors Working Group

Guideline on Process Validation

The EU Clinical Trial Regulation A regulator s perspective

GUIDANCE for Administration of the Sunset Clause

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 95 thereof,

VOLUME 2A Procedures for marketing authorisation CHAPTER 1 MARKETING AUTHORISATION. November 2005

EU Clinical Trials Regulation Regulation EU 536/2014

REGULATION (EEC) No 2309/93

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL

VOLUME 6A Procedures for marketing authorisation

The Clinical Trials Regulation EU No 536/2014: and Phase I trials

EU Clinical Trials Register. An agency of the European Union

GCP INSPECTORS WORKING GROUP <DRAFT> REFLECTION PAPER ON EXPECTATIONS FOR ELECTRONIC SOURCE DOCUMENTS USED IN CLINICAL TRIALS

COMMITTEE FOR PROPRIETARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (CPMP)

LEBANESE MINISTRY OF HEALTH DIRECTIVE

Questions and answers on preparation, management and assessment of periodic safety update reports (PSURs)

COMMITTEE ON HERBAL MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (HMPC) FINAL COMMUNITY HERBAL MONOGRAPH ON AVENA SATIVA L., FRUCTUS

Draft agreed by the QWP February Draft adopted by the CHMP for release for consultation March Draft endorsed by the CMD(h) March 2015

Draft agreed by the QWP February Draft adopted by the CHMP for release for consultation March Draft endorsed by the CMD(h) March 2015

Adoption by GCP Inspectors Working Group for consultation 14 June End of consultation (deadline for comments) 15 February 2012

White Paper The EU Clinical Trials Regulation Main Changes and Challenges

Adoption by CHMP for release for consultation November End of consultation (deadline for comments) 31 March 2011

ICH Topic E 2 A Clinical Safety Data Management: Definitions and Standards for Expedited Reporting. Step 5

European Medicines Agency decision

Response of the German Medical Association

The New EU Clinical Trial Regulation Potential Impacts on Sites

Work instructions. 1. Changes since last revision. 2. Records. 3. Instructions EXPLANATORY NOTES

Authorisation and Restriction Newsletter

Standard operating procedure

Serious Breaches. Ian Gravenor. Senior Clinical Project Manager Novo Nordisk Ltd

Clinical Trials Facilitation Groups

The European regulatory system for medicines and the European Medicines Agency

Emergence of Compassionate Use programmes

Reflection paper on the Use of Interactive Response Technologies (Interactive Voice/Web Response Systems) in Clinical Trials

SANITARY AND PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES (SPS)

II. AREA OF INVOLVEMENT OF PATIENTS AND CONSUMERS IN EMEA ACTIVITIES

PHV- 4 version 1 ELECTRONIC ADVERSE DRUG REACTION REPORTING

Work plan for GMP/GDP Inspectors Working Group for 2016

Procedures for management of revisions/renewals of certificates of suitability to the European Pharmacopoeia monographs

Overview of Key Obligations Under Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 on the Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures (CLP)

MRP & DCP step by steb instructions how to apply and how the procedures are conducted

REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT

Clinical research: where are we with the new (Paediatric) RC trial Regulation

QRD recommendations on pack design and labelling for centrally authorised non-prescription human medicinal products

Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

EU DIRECTIVE ON GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE IN CLINICAL TRIALS DH & MHRA BRIEFING NOTE

Overview of Authorisation Procedures for Medicinal Products

EUROPEAN COMMISSION ENTERPRISE DIRECTORATE-GENERAL. Brussels, ENTR/F2/BL D(2003) CT 1 Revision 2

COMMITTEE FOR PROPRIETARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (CPMP) NOTE FOR GUIDANCE ON THE PRE-CLINICAL EVALUATION OF ANTICANCER MEDICINAL PRODUCTS

Cetirizin "Copyfarm" 10 mg Filmcoated tablet Oral Energivej 15, POB 69 DK-5260 Odense S Denmark Netherlands. Cetirizine dihydrochloride

Annex. DRAFT Guidance Document on the Planning and Implementation of Joint Reviews of Pesticides. Revision 8 September 2010

Reflection paper on clinical aspects related to tissue engineered products

Quick Response (QR) codes in the labelling and package leaflet of centrally authorised 1 medicinal products

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) GUIDELINE ON RISK MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE

COMMITTEE ON HERBAL MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (HMPC) FINAL COMMUNITY HERBAL MONOGRAPH ON HYPERICUM PERFORATUM L., HERBA (TRADITIONAL USE)

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP)

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, and in particular Article 100 thereof;

NRA FUNCTION IN CONTROLLING VACCINES IN CLINICAL TRIAL AND MARKETING AUTHORIZATION INDONESIA 2013 DVI MEETING 9 11 APRIL

CHMP/BWP (COMMITTEE ABBREVIATION) GUIDELINE ON VIRUS SAFETY EVALUATION OF BIOTECHNOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONAL MEDICINAL PRODUCTS

The European Clinical Trials Framework Update on the Draft Clinical Trials Regulation

Marketing Authorisation Of A Product In Czech Republic

Reflection Paper on Medicinal Product Supply Shortages Caused by Manufacturing/GMP Compliance Problems

Clinical trials regulation

A 4.5 Validity Period of a Marketing Authorisation

Reflection paper on non-spontaneous adverse event reports (peer-reviewed literature, internet and social media)

Overview of the EU CTA Regulatory Framework and Future Direction of the EU Clinical Trial Directive. Features

EFPIA Principles for the Development of the EU Clinical Trials Portal and Database

EUDRAVIGILANCE TELEMATICS IMPLEMENTATION GROUP

UK Implementation of the EU Clinical Trial Directive 2001/20/EC:

Transcription:

European Medicines Agency Veterinary Medicines and Inspections London, 18 May 2006 Doc. Ref. EMEA/CVMP/32995/2006 COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR VETERINARY USE (CVMP) GUIDELINE ON THE PROCEDURE FOR ACCELERATED ASSESSMENT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 39 (8) OF REGULATION (EC) No 726/2004 ADOPTED BY CVMP FOR RELEASE FOR CONSULTATION 16 February 2006 END OF CONSULTATION (DEADLINE FOR COMMENTS) 16 March 2006 ADOPTION BY CVMP 17 May 2006 DATE FOR COMING INTO EFFECT 22 May 2006 7 Westferry Circus, Canary Wharf, London, E14 4HB, UK Tel. (44-20) 74 18 84 00 Fax (44-20) 74 18 84 47 E-mail: mail@emea.eu.int http://www.emea.eu.int Reproduction and/or distribution of this document is authorised for non commercial purposes only provided the EMEA is acknowledged

GUIDELINE ON THE PROCEDURE FOR ACCELERATED ASSESSMENT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 39 (8) OF REGULATION (EC) No 726/2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. LEGAL BASIS AND PURPOSE... 3 2. SCOPE AND GENERAL PRINCIPLES... 3 3. EMEA ADVICE PRIOR TO SUBMISSION... 4 4. QUALIFICATION OF A REQUEST FOR AN ACCELERATED ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE... 5 5. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR AN ACCELERATED ASSESSMENT... 5 6. TIMETABLE... 6 Page 2/7

1. LEGAL BASIS AND PURPOSE Recital 33 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 1 states that in order to meet, in particular the legitimate expectations of patients and to take account of the increasingly rapid progress of science and therapies, accelerated assessment procedures should be set up, reserved for medicinal products of major therapeutic interest, and procedures for obtaining temporary authorisations subject to certain annually reviewable conditions. Article 39 (8) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004, states that when an application is submitted for a marketing authorisation in respect of veterinary medicinal products of major interest, particularly from the point of view of animal health and from the viewpoint of therapeutic innovation, the applicant may request an accelerated assessment procedure. The request shall be duly substantiated. If the Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use (CVMP) accepts the request, the timelimit (of 210 days to give an opinion) laid down in Article 31(3), first subparagraph, shall be reduced to 150 days. This document aims to provide guidance on the submission of a request for accelerated assessment, and the timetable of an accelerated assessment procedure. This document will be updated to include more detailed explanation and examples. 2. SCOPE AND GENERAL PRINCIPLES The accelerated assessment procedure is applicable to marketing authorisation applications for veterinary medicinal products falling within the scope of articles 3(1) and 3(2) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004. Applicants requesting an accelerated assessment procedure should justify that the veterinary medicinal product is expected to be of major animal health interest particularly from the point of view of therapeutic innovation. Based on the request, the justifications presented, and the recommendations of the rapporteurs, the CVMP will formulate a decision on the request for accelerated assessment. At the time of the request, the CVMP assessment of the request is based on the justification presented in favour of a claim of major animal health interest and not on assessment of the marketing authorisation application. The CVMP will review the justifications and claims, and formulate a view on whether the request can be granted. After a request has been granted, at any time during the marketing authorisation application evaluation, if the CVMP considers that it is no longer appropriate to conduct an accelerated assessment (following discussion with the Applicant when necessary) the CVMP may decide to continue the assessment under standard centralised procedure timelines according to Article 31 (3) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004. The duration of the assessment outside a formal request for accelerated assessment is part of the normal functioning of the CVMP and is outside the scope of this guideline. There is no single definition of what constitutes major animal health interest. This should be justified by the applicant on a case by case basis. The justification should present the arguments to support the claim that the veterinary medicinal product introduces new methods of therapy or improves on existing methods, thereby addressing to a significant extent the greater unmet needs for maintaining and improving the animal health of the Community. Typical examples of greater unmet needs are serious, or life-threatening conditions when available methods are absent or by and large insufficient in terms of lack of available products or lack of efficacy as well as serious epizootic animal diseases and animal health threats recognised either by OIE or by the Community. 1 OJ L 136, 30/4/2004 p. 1-33. Page 3/7

The emphasis of the accelerated assessment procedure is on products that bring therapeutic innovation, i.e., products that introduce new methods (treatment, prevention, medical diagnosis), or improve on existing methods. A description of the expected major impact of the veterinary medicinal product in terms of veterinary practice, its major added value compared to existing methods, and/or how it addresses the greater unmet needs, should be provided to establish that the product is expected to be of major animal health interest (see section 4.2, Justification for a request for accelerated assessment). A decision on accelerated assessment will be taken without prejudice to the CVMP opinion (positive or negative) on the granting of a marketing authorisation. The scientific evaluation of a marketing authorisation application is governed by a timetable adopted by the CVMP. The EMEA in consultation with the rapporteurs prepare a timetable. This timetable is then proposed to the CVMP for adoption. In general, the CVMP will take into consideration the standard timetable agreed for the evaluation of a centralised application (see Notice to Applicants, vol. 6A, chapter. 4). If a request for an accelerated assessment procedure is granted, the CVMP will take into consideration the standard timetable agreed for the accelerated assessment procedure (see section 6). The submission or outcome of a request for accelerated assessment is without prejudice to the fact that the CVMP may adopt a shorter or otherwise different than the standard timetable, as appropriate. In case of the granting of a request for an accelerated assessment procedure, the EMEA shall ensure that the opinion of the CVMP is given within 150 days. To facilitate the process of evaluation of a request for accelerated assessment and the necessary planning in the pre-submission phase of the marketing authorisation, it is recommended that a notification with the intent to submit a request for accelerated assessment be provided to the EMEA. The notification should be provided well in advance of the submission of the application for marketing authorisation. The actual request for accelerated assessment is submitted in a second step, prior to the start of the scientific assessment. Following assessment of the request, the CVMP decides on whether the request on accelerated assessment should be granted. 3. EMEA ADVICE PRIOR TO SUBMISSION 3.1 Notification of intent to submit a request for accelerated assessment The applicant should notify the intent to submit a request for an accelerated assessment procedure as part of the letter of intent to submit a marketing authorisation application to be sent to the EMEA in advance of the submission of the marketing authorisation application (see Notice to Applicants, volume 6, chapter 4. Procedure for submission of the marketing authorisation application). 3.2 Pre-submission guidance When preparing the submission of a marketing authorisation application, applicants have the opportunity to meet the EMEA to discuss relevant procedural or regulatory issues on the proposed submission. Applicants should seek guidance from the EMEA on the scheduled dates of CVMP plenary meetings and start of the procedure, to ensure timely submission of the request for accelerated assessment. In view of a potential request for accelerated assessment, it is strongly recommended that the applicant requests EMEA pre-submission advice as early as possible, to discuss the request for an accelerated assessment procedure and the timetable for the accelerated procedure. If necessary, as soon as rapporteurs have been assigned, the applicant may request a pre-submission meeting with EMEA and the rapporteurs, to present and discuss issues related to dossier presentation or the substantiating of the request for accelerated assessment. Page 4/7

4. QUALIFICATION OF A REQUEST FOR AN ACCELERATED ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE 4.1 Timing of the submission of a request for accelerated assessment For a smooth and reliable running of procedures and optimal planning of the work, the CVMP sets up timelines ahead of submissions for marketing authorisation. An accelerated assessment request has to be agreed in advance of the start of marketing authorisation application evaluation as it introduces changes in the operation of the CVMP and procedure timelines. Any request for accelerated assessment should be made as early as possible before the actual submission of the marketing authorisation application. The timing of the request should be at least 10 working days in advance of the CVMP plenary meeting preceding the intended start of the centralised procedure (see 3.2, Pre-submission guidance). In practice, submission of the request will generally occur at least between 10 to30 days before the intended start of the procedure. The request (including the justification) should be sent electronically to the EMEA. Following receipt of a request for accelerated assessment, the EMEA shall produce a briefing note including the rapporteurs recommendations as to the appropriateness of an accelerated assessment. The CVMP will consider the request submitted by the applicant, the rapporteurs recommendations, and the views of other CVMP members. If necessary, the CVMP may request clarifications from the applicant about the request. The CVMP will conclude on the acceptability or not of the request. The CVMP conclusions will be communicated to the applicant. The reasons for accepting or rejecting the request will also be summarised in the CVMP assessment report. 4.2 Justification for a request for accelerated assessment Applicants requesting an accelerated assessment procedure should duly substantiate the request and in particular, justify their expectation that the veterinary medicinal product is of major animal health interest particularly from the point of view of therapeutic innovation. The risk of the epidemiological situation with regard to human and/or animal health must outweigh the benefit of a normal assessment timetable. The key items to be described in the justification, and the appropriate level of detail, should be evaluated on a case by case basis. The request should be presented as a short but comprehensive document (ideal length 5-10 pages). A justification including the major benefits expected should be submitted. The following list of key items would normally be addressed in a justification for a request for accelerated assessment: The unmet needs and the available methods of prevention, diagnosis or treatment. The extent to which the veterinary medicinal product is expected to have major impact on veterinary practice, its major added value, and/or how it addresses the greater unmet needs. A brief outline of the main available evidence (e.g., number of clinical trials, key results) on which the applicant bases its claim of major animal health interest. 5. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR AN ACCELERATED ASSESSMENT 5.1 Duration of the analysis of the scientific data Article 39(8) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 states that the applicant may request an accelerated assessment procedure when an application is submitted for a marketing authorisation in respect of veterinary medicinal products of major interest, particularly from the point of view of animal health and therapeutic innovation. If the Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use accepts the request the time-limit shall be reduced to 150 days. In specific cases of a serious disease epidemic the assessment time could be further reduced if the CVMP considers this to be appropriate. Page 5/7

The process of scientific assessment, distribution of the assessment reports to the CVMP and sharing of assessment reports and information about the procedure with the applicant, etc. will in principle be the same as for normal timetable (except for the different timelines). Where necessary, the CVMP will express the need for further information from the applicant (list of questions) to be provided in writing and/or at an oral explanation. The CVMP may agree to postpone the oral explanation to the next plenary meeting (1-month clock-stop) following the adoption of the list of questions. 5.2 Possible switch to normal time table Following the granting of a request, the CVMP shall adhere to the accelerated timetable in accordance with Article 39(8) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 for the assessment. However, at any time during the marketing authorisation application assessment, if the CVMP considers that it is no longer appropriate to conduct an accelerated assessment, the CVMP may decide to continue the assessment under the standard centralised procedure assessment timelines, following an appropriate timetable to be adopted by the CVMP, according to Article 31(3) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004. Examples of such situations are when major objections have been identified that cannot be handled in an accelerated timetable, when a clock-stop longer than one month is requested by the applicant to prepare for the oral explanation, or when late in the procedure the need for GMP or GCP inspection becomes apparent. Similarly, in case of a negative trend following the oral explanation, the CVMP may decide to continue the assessment under standard assessment timelines. Having taken into consideration the standard timetable agreed by the CVMP for the evaluation of a centralised application, a timetable is prepared by the EMEA in consultation with rapporteurs. This timetable is then proposed to the CVMP for adoption. The new timetable is communicated to the applicant. Where appropriate, the CVMP will consult the applicant to explain the reasons for the change to the assessment timetable, and seek clarifications and comments about the proposed revised timetable. The applicant may also submit a justified request for a change to a standard assessment procedure, for example if additional time is needed for the applicant to provide any information requested by the CVMP. The CVMP shall consider such requests on a case by case basis and if appropriate adopt a revised time table following Article 31(3) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004. The new timetable is communicated to the applicant. 6. TIMETABLE 6.1 Pre-submission phase Pre-submission meeting strongly recommended Day 120 Notification of intent to submit a request for accelerated assessment (as part of the notification of intent to submit a marketing authorisation application, 4-6 months prior to submission of MAA) Day 30 to 10 Submission of request for accelerated assessment. The timing of the request should be at least 10 working days in advance of the CVMP plenary meeting preceding the intended start of the centralised procedure. The exact timing depends on the dates of the CVMP meeting preceding the intended start of the procedure. Generally this will occur between 10-30 days before the intended start of the procedure. Generally this will occur between 10-30 days before the intended start of the procedure. The exact timing depends on the dates of the CVMP meeting preceding the intended start of the procedure. Page 6/7

Day 20 to 0 CVMP plenary meeting preceding the start of the procedure Day 0 Validation Circulation of EMEA/Rapporteurs briefing note on the request for accelerated assessment. CVMP discussion, and conclusion on the request for accelerated assessment. Timetable to be adopted if appropriate. The conclusions are communicated to the applicant. 6.2 Accelerated assessment procedure Day 1 Start of the centralised procedure Day 60 Rapporteurs assessment reports The rapporteurs will ensure that there is adequate and early interaction between the assessment teams to prepare for the upcoming discussions and next steps If the CVMP considers that the accelerated assessment procedure is no longer appropriate, then this will lead to a switch to a normal timetable and adoption of a CVMP list of questions at day 120 (see 5.1 and 5.2). Day 90 Opinion, or CVMP expresses the need for further information The CVMP may agree to a justified request for a 1-month clock-stop to allow for the applicant to prepare oral and/or written explanations. Possible change to standard timetable (see 5.2) Stop clock Submission of written responses Day 91 The applicant provides the information requested, restart of the clock Day 115 Rapporteurs joint assessment report Rapporteurs views on the need for oral or written explanations The applicant may request to provide an oral explanation to the CVMP Day 120 Opinion, or CVMP request for oral or written explanations The CVMP may agree to a request for a 1-month clock-stop to allow for the applicant to prepare oral or written explanations, if justified. Possible switch to normal time table (see 5.2) Day 121 Oral explanation (as appropriate), and Opinion, or start of finalisation of opinion Day 150 Opinion Possible change to standard timetable (see 5.2) Page 7/7