My remarks today and the information contained in these slides do not necessarily reflect the official views of FDA.



Similar documents
HCV Interaction Studies presented at the 15 th International Workshop on Clinical Pharmacology of HIV and Hepatitis Therapy, Washington, April 2014.

Drug/Drug and Drug/Food Interactions with Target-Specific Oral Anticoagulants

TSOAC Initiation Checklist

Os Novos Anticoagulantes não são necessários

ANTICOAGULANT DRUG INTERACTIONS. New Agents, New Concerns

Clinically Significant Cardiovascular. Drug Interactions. April 30, 2014 Michael A Militello, PharmD, BCPS Cardiovascular Clinical Pharmacist

When should in vivo transportermediated drug-drug interaction studies be conducted? A scientific perspective

Efficacy in Hip Arthroplasty. Efficacy in Knee Arthroplasty. Adverse Effects. Drug Interactions

Perspective Hepatitis C Virus Direct-Acting Antiviral Drug Interactions and Use in Renal and Hepatic Impairment

Novel Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) Prescriber Update 2013

Lead optimization services

Drug Development and Drug Interactions: Table of Substrates, Inhibitors and Inducers

Slide 1. Slide 2. Slide 3. Disclosures. Objectives DRUG INTERACTIONS WITH NEW ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS. None

Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs): novel problems and their solutions

Practical How-to: Treating Patients with New Anticoagulants case scenarios

ANNEX I SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS

Guidance for Industry

Patient Information Leaflet Drug interaction with ED drug treatments

DOACs. What s in a name? or TSOACs. Blood Clot. Darra Cover, Pharm D. Clot Formation DOACs work here. Direct Oral AntiCoagulant

Adherence to oral cancer therapies

Experience matters: Practical management in your hospital

Classical drug resistance in the molecular age

Clinical Study Synopsis for Public Disclosure


FDA Approved Oral Anticoagulants

Drug-Drug Interactions in the Treatment of Hepatitis C

Patient Information VYTORIN (VI-tor-in) (ezetimibe and simvastatin) Tablets

More information for patients and caregivers can be accessed at

The Novel Oral Anticoagulants

DABIGATRAN ETEXILATE TARGET Vitamin K epoxide reductase WARFARIN RIVAROXABAN APIXABAN

Speaker Disclosure. Outline. Pharmacist Objectives. Patient Case. Outline 9/4/2014

Post-Approval Change Management: Challenges and Opportunities An FDA Perspective

Guidance for Industry

BIOAVAILABILITY & BIOEQUIVALENCE TRIALS

Management for Deep Vein Thrombosis and New Agents

Rivaroxaban (Xarelto ) by

Direct antiviral therapy of hcv and relevant drug drug interactions for ivdu

How To Compare The New Oral Anticoagulants

**Form 1: - Consultant Copy** Telephone Number: Fax Number: Author: Dr Bernard Udeze Pharmacist: Claire Ault Date of issue July 2011

Disclosure/Conflict of Interest

News Release. Media contacts: Ernie Knewitz Tel: Mobile:

Statin Safety 2014 NLA Update


NCCP Chemotherapy Protocol. Afatinib Monotherapy

Reversing the New Anticoagulants

Devang M. Desai, MD, FACC, FSCAI Chief of Interventional Cardiology Director of Cardiac Catheterization Lab St. Mary s Hospital and Regional Medical

Novel Anticoagulants: Case of Mr. T

New anticoagulants: Monitoring or not Monitoring? Not Monitoring

MEDICAL ASSISTANCE HANDBOOK PRIOR AUTHORIZATION OF PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES. A. Prescriptions That Require Prior Authorization

Managing HIV Patients with Cardiac Disease: How to Avoid Going Into Heart Failure (the clinician, not the patient)

Disclosure: Dr. Smith has no actual or potential conflict of interest associated with this presentation.

Overview of Dissolution for BA/BE

Clinically Significant Drug Interactions: When Not to Roll the Dice

COMMITTEE ON HERBAL MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (HMPC) FINAL COMMUNITY HERBAL MONOGRAPH ON HYPERICUM PERFORATUM L., HERBA (WELL-ESTABLISHED MEDICINAL USE)

New Oral Anticoagulants Who Gets What for Atrial Fibrillation and Venous Thromboembolism?

MEDICAL ASSISTANCE BULLETIN

DRAFT GUIDANCE. This guidance document is being distributed for comment purposes only.

Safety aspects of protease inhibitors for chronic hepatitis C: adverse events and drug-to-drug interactions

Translating clinical evidence into real-world outcomes

Outsourcing in Drug Development From the Bench to the Market. Steven A. Kates, PhD Ischemix LLC

VKA to NOACs Really? Kevin W. Yingling, R.Ph., M.D., FACP November 1, 2014

Herta Crauwels, et al.: Rilpivirine Drug-Drug Interactions

Novel Oral Anticoagulants. Samuel J. Asirvatham, M.D. 5 th Annual Dallas Cardiovascular Innovations Symposium Saturday January 16, :30-2:40 PM

CANDIDA INFECTIONS - TREATMENT GUIDELINES IN ADULT

Understanding Pharmacokinetic Variability and Managing Drug Interactions

Guideline for the Prescribing of Novel Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs): Dabigatran (Pradaxa ), Rivaroxaban (Xarelto ), Apixaban (Eliquis )

Bioequivalence Study Design Considerations. Dr. John Gordon

Education grant to fund the project

Dabigatran (Pradaxa) Guidelines

Drug-Drug Interactions with Antiretroviral Therapy. Case-Based Discussions

DRUG INTERACTIONS WITH NEW/INVESTIGATIONAL HEPATITIS C NS5A INHIBITORS. Ledipasvir (LDV, GS-5885) Gilead. 90 mg once daily

Summary of the risk management plan (RMP) for Orkambi (lumacaftor and ivacaftor)

Managing Drug Interactions in Transplant Recipients

AF, Stroke Risk and New Anticoagulants

Summary of the risk management plan (RMP) for Cerdelga (eliglustat)

New Oral Anticoagulants for VTE, A-fib, and ACS

Session 3 Topics. Argatroban. Argatroban. Drug Use and Adverse Effects. Laboratory Monitoring of Anticoagulant Therapy

DOSAGE FORMS AND STRENGTHS HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION

Guidance for Industry

HELPFUL TIPS WHEN FACING CHRONIC HEPATITIS C

Analytical Specifications RIVAROXABAN

Alterações empresariais sustentadas pelo conceito de engenharia do Produto Patrício Soares da Silva, MD, PhD

A Critical Analysis of the Interplay between Cytochrome P450 3A and P-Glycoprotein: Recent Insights from Knockout and Transgenic Mice

22-Oct-14. Oral Anticoagulation Which Drug for Which Patient in the era of New Oral Anti-coagulants. Atrial Fibrillation. AF as an embolic risk factor

A practice tool for the new oral anticoagulants

Introduction to pharmaceutical technology

MEDICAL ASSISTANCE HANDBOOK PRIOR AUTHORIZATION OF PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES. A. Prescriptions That Require Prior Authorization

DIVISION OF HUMAN NUTRITION

Anticoagulation: How Do I Pick From All the Choices? Jeffrey H. Neuhauser, DO, FACC BHHI Primary Care Symposium February 28, 2014

Clinical application of Thrombin Generation for new oral anticoagulants

Time of Offset of Action The Trial

Guidance for prescribing of Dabigatran (Pradaxa ) Rivaroxaban (Xarelto ) and Apixaban (Eliquis ) in Patients with Non-Valvular AF

In Vitro and In Vivo P-glycoprotein Transport Characteristics

CLINICAMP 2015 CASE DISCUSSION ON NOACs. Stephane Steurbaut Anne-Sophie Larock

Atrial Fibrillation Current State of Management with Importance to Newer Anticoagulants and Devices

Pharmacodynamics and Drug-Drug Interactions in HCV/HIV Co-Infected Persons on Treatment with DAAs

ANORO ELLIPTA (umeclidinium and vilanterol inhalation powder) FOR ORAL INHALATION USE Initial U.S. Approval: 2013

New oral anticoagulants and antiplatelets: Where do they fit? Meredith Hollinger, PharmD BCPS

Oral Anticoagulants: What s New?

Integration of DiscoveryQuant Software into Automated In-Vitro ADME Assay Workflows

Transcription:

Possible Criteria that Warrant In Vivo P-Glycoprotein Glycoprotein-Mediated Drug Interaction Studies Based on In Vitro Assessment Lei Zhang, Ph.D. Office of Clinical Pharmacology Office of Translational Sciences Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Food and Drug Administration Disclaimer My remarks today and the information contained in these slides do not necessarily reflect the official views of FDA. 2 1

Outline P-gp substrate Decision i tree Inhibitor considerations P-gp inhibitor Decision tree On-going activities ities P-gp inducer 3 P-gp Substrate Decision Tree 4 2

Decision tree to determine whether an investigational drug is a substrate for P-gp and whether an in vivo drug interaction study with a P-gp inhibitor is needed Bi-directional transport assay Net flux Ratio > 2 Net flux ratio < 2 Is efflux significantly inhibited by 1 or more P-gp inhibitors Poor or non-substrate YES Likely a P-gp substrate NO Other efflux transporters are responsible An in vivo interaction study with a P-gp inhibitor may be warranted Note exceptions BCRP Zhang L et.al., Xenobiotica, 38: 709 724, 2008 5 Selection of Inhibitors Overlap of P-gp and CYP3A inhibitors Inhibition potentcy for either P-gp or CYP3A may not be equal If an NME is a dual substrate Select potent/strong inhibitors for both for worst case scenario 6 3

Overlap of CYP3A and P-gp Inhibitors Strong CYP3A Inhibitors (>5-fold change in AUC) Ritonavir (22%) Voriconazole (15%) Conivaptan (44%) Nefazodone Telithromycin (positive case report) Itraconazole Clarithromycin Ketoconazole* Lopinavir/RIT* Potent P-gp Inhibitors (>50% change in AUC) Moderate CYP3A Inhibitors: Erythromycin Verapamil Weak CYP3A Inhibitors: Amiodarone Quinidine Azithromycin Ranolazine Felodipine In vivo potency for P-gp unknown: Indinavir Troleandomycin Nelfinavir Saquinavir In vivo potency for CYP3A unknown: Carvedilol Data Source: UW DIDB 7 P-gp Inhibitor Decision Tree 8 4

Decision tree to determine whether an investigational drug is an inhibitor of P-gp and whether an in vivo drug interaction study with a P-gp substrate is needed (updated version) Bi-directional transport assay Ntfl Net flux with Ntfl Net flux with [drug] [drug] Determine K i or IC 50 Poor or non-inhibitor [I] 1 /IC 50 (or K i ) > 0.1 [I] 1 /IC 50 (or K i ) < 0.1 or and [I] 2 /IC 50 (or K i ) > 10 [I] 2 /IC 50 (or K i ) < 10 An in vivo interaction study with a P-gp substrate (e.g., digoxin) is recommended An in vivo interaction study with a P-gp substrate is not needed 9 P-gp Inhibition Data Collection Digoxin, a narrow index therapeutic drug, is the recommended probe substrate in the guidance. A database for drugs that have both in vitro and in vivo interaction ti data with digoxin was created. 10 5

In Vivo Data In vivo interaction data with digoxin were collected from literature or NDA packages. Significant in vivo inhibition on oral digoxin pharmacokinetics was defined as an increase of C max or AUC by > 25%. 11 In Vitro Data In vitro IC 50 data for inhibiting digoxin transport t were collected. Two [I]/IC 50 ratios were calculated for each drug, where [I] was: [I] 1 = Total C max at steady-state [I] 2 = Dose divided by a volume of 250 ml 12 6

Drugs that showed significant in vivo inhibition on digoxin (1) Compound % Increase in C max % Increase in AUC [I] 1 /IC 50 [I] 2 /IC 50 Cyclosporin 44% - 1.75 729 Itraconazole 34% 68% 0.73 872 Quinidine 44% - 0.28 64 Zhang L et.al., Xenobiotica, 38(7 8): 709 724, 2008 >0.1 >10 13 Drugs that showed significant in vivo inhibition on digoxin (2) Compound % Increase in C max % Increase in AUC [I] 1 /IC 50 [I] 2 /IC 50 Clarithromycin 83% 64% <0.026 <13.4 0.65 326 Verapamil 44% 50% 0.022 119 Diltiazem 37% 51% 0.024 76 Ranolazine 46% 60% 0.043 47.5 Zhang L et.al., Xenobiotica, 38(7 8): 709 724, 2008 <0.1 >10 14 7

Drugs that did not show significant in vivo inhibition on digoxin Compound % Increase in C max % Increase in AUC [I] 1 /IC 50 [I] 2 /IC 50 Atorvastatin 20% 15% < 0.00049 < 2.65 Rosuvastatin 4% 4% <0.00017 <1.60 Losartan 13% 6% 0.0031 2.78 Omeprazole 10% 10% 0.022 2.32 Sitagliptin 18% 11% < 0.0019 < 1.53 Zhang L et.al., Xenobiotica, 38(7 8): 709 724, 2008 <0.1 <10 15 Results Drugs that had [I] 1 /IC50 > 0.1 or [I] 2 /IC50 >10 showed significant interaction with digoxin. Drugs that had [I] 1 /IC50 < 0.1 and [I] 2 /IC50 <10 did not show significant interaction with digoxin. Three false negatives: talinolol, captopril, and felodipine Zhang L, et.al., Xenobiotica, 38: 709 724, 2008 Fenner K, et al., CPT 85, 173-181, 2009 16 8

False Negatives Compound Talinolol % Increase in Cmax C max 45% % Increase in AUC [I] 1 /IC 50 [I] 2 /IC 50 18% 0.0024 4.17 Felodipne 34% 18% 0.001 3.59 Captopril* 59% 39% < 0.0046 < 2.30 * In healthy young males, there in no interaction with digoxin (Digoxin Label). Need further attention: Mechanisms of inhibition involving other transporters? - Digoxin is also a substrate of OATP 17 False Positives Fenner K, et al., CPT 85, 173-181, 2009 The inhibition effect is canceled out by induction? Troglitazone is a CYP3A inducer and PXR activator (likely a P-gp inducer?) Nicardipine is a PXR activator (likely a P-gp inducer?) 18 9

Limitations Only consider P-gp inhibition. No interplay between metabolism and P-gp or induction could be projected. In vitro IC 50 determination may be different from different labs which could impact the I/IC 50 ratios. Only for immediate-release formulation. May not work for investigator drugs that are prodrugs. 19 200 ** [I] 2 /IC 50 Ratios: < 5 > 5 150 IC (µm) 50 100 Digoxin NSF Caco-2 50 Digoxin ER caco-2 Cal-AM MDCK-MDR1 Digoxin B-A MDCK-MDR1 Cal-AM MDCK-MDR1 GSK (B-A) Digoxin LLC-GA5-COL150-MDR1 Caco-2 Digoxin 0 Amiodarone asd Cyclosporin Diltiazem Itraconazole Ketoconazole Nitrendipine Quinidine Ritonavir Talinolol Verapamil Nicardipine Carvedilol R123 NIH-3T3-G185 MDCK-MDR1 Dig Caco-2 2Di Dig **Talinolol there are two IC50 values that lie beyond the Y axis scale) 20 Caroline Lee, et. al. (Poster #1012) 10

How good is the prediction based on the Decision Tree? [I] 1 /IC50 > 0.1 or [I] 2 /IC50 >10 for positive P-gp inhibition False negative: 19% (3/16) False positive: 27% (3/11) Zhang L et.al., Xenobiotica, 38: 709 724, 2008 Fenner et al., CPT 85 (2), 173-181, 2009 21 How well do we predict P450 inhibition using I max /Ki > 0.1? False Negative: 37% (15/41) False Positive: 33% (3/9) ) Data Source: Ito et al., AAPS PharmSci 2002; 4 (3), Article 20 22 11

How well do we predict P450 inhibition using I in, max, u /Ki? False Negative: 17% %(7/41) False Positive: 44% (4/9) Data Source: Ito et al., AAPS PharmSci 2002; 4 (3), Article 20 23 On-going Activities (1) Following DIA/FDA Critical Path Transporter workshop, a working group is formed to further study IC 50 for P-gp inhibition Led by Caroline Lee Interested scientists from industry and FDA Caco-2 MDR1-LLCPK MDR1-MDCK Vesicle 24 12

On-going Activities (2) Study the same panel of 16 compounds on digoxin transport inhibition P-gp OATP? Determine the potential for inhibiting OATP as well? IC 50 calculation methods 25 P-gp Inducer Evaluation Methods for in vitro evaluation for P-gp induction are not well understood. The P-gp induction potential of an investigational drug can only be evaluated in vivo. Because of similarities in the mechanism of CYP3A and P-gp induction, information from test of CYP3A inducibility can inform decisions about P-gp. 26 13

P-gp Inducer Evaluation (Cont d) If an investigational drug is found not to induce CYP3A in vitro, no further tests of CYP3A and P- gp induction in vivo are necessary. If a study of the investigational drug s effect on CYP3A activity in vivo is indicated from a positive in vitro screen, but the drug is shown not to induce CYP3A in vivo, then no further test of P-gp induction in vivo is necessary. However, if the in vivo CYP3A induction test t is positive, then an additional study of the investigation drug s effect on a P-gp probe substrate is recommended. 27 Summary The criteria proposed in the decision trees provide a starting point for identifying compounds having a potential to interact with P-gp. Collect more data to further evaluate these prediction criteria. In vitro IC 50 determination needs to be standardized. Appropriate controls are needed to compare results from different laboratories. 28 14

Acknowledgments Drs. Shiew-Mei Huang and Larry Lesko International Drug Transporter Working Group Members 29 Backup slides 30 15

Drug interaction Number Recent Data Sugiyama (Xenobiotica, in press) Our decision tree: DIN>2.5 L 31 Recent Data CYP3A4 inhibitors with a DIN below 2.8 L have a low risk of interacting with substrates t which h exhibit intestinal ti firstpass metabolism and those with a DIN above 9.4 L have a high risk P-gp inhibitors with a DIN below 10.8 L have a low risk of interacting with P-gp substrates and those with a DIN above 27.9 L have a high risk; The DIN indexes 2.8 L and 9.4 L for CYP3A4 and 10.8 L and 27.9 L for P-gp, were validated by data from dual CYP3A4/P-gp substrates Sugiyama (Xenobiotica, in press) 32 16

Sugiyama (Xenobiotica, in press) 33 False Negatives 34 17

False Positives Fenner K, et al., CPT 85, 173-181, 2009 35 Differences in IC 50 values may caused by using different substrate, t cell system, calculation method, etc. Despite the varying IC 50 values reported in the literature, in general, compounds cluster in either the unshaded region (predict interaction) or the shaded region (predict no interaction) 36 18

Alternative In Vitro Assay Vesicles may be used to evaluate the role of efflux transporters such as P- gp as an alternative method if molecules show low permeability. 37 How well do we predict P450 inhibition using I max, u /Ki? False Negative: 66% (27/41) False Positive: 11% (1/9) 38 19

60 50 ** [I]/IC 50 Ratios: < 0.1 > 0.1 IC 50 (µm M) 40 30 20 10 Digoxin NSF Caco-2 Digoxin ER caco-2 Cal-AM MDCK-MDR1 MDR1 Digoxin B-A MDCK-MDR1 Cal-AM MDCK-MDR1 GSK (B-A) Digoxin LLC-GA5-COL150-MDR1 Caco-2 Digoxin R123 NIH-3T3-G185 MDCK-MDR1 Dig Caco-2 Dig 0 sfg Amiodarone Amiodarone Cyclosporin Cyclosporin Diltiazem Diltiazem Itraconazole Itraconazole Ketoconazole Ketoconazole Nitrendipine Nitrendipine Quinidine Quinidine Ritonavir Ritonavir Talinolol Talinolol Verapamil Verapamil Nicardipine Nicardipine Carvedilol Carvedilol **Talinolol there are two IC50 values that lie beyond the Y axis scale) 39 Courtesy: Caroline Lee (Poster) Draft Guidance (http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/6695dft.pdf): Decision tree to determine whether an investigational drug is an inhibitor of P-gp and whether an in vivo drug interaction study with a P-gp substrate is needed Bi-directional transport assay Net flux with [drug] Net flux [drug] with Determine K i or IC 50 Poor or non-inhibitor [I]/IC 50 (or K i ) > 0.1 [I]/IC 50 (or K i ) < 0.1 An in vivo interaction study with a P-gp substrate (e.g., digoxin) is recommended An in vivo interaction study with a P-gp substrate is not needed 40 20