U.S. regulatory capital: Basel III supplementary leverage ratio final rule. Key highlights for advanced approaches banks



Similar documents
Basel leverage ratio: No cover for US banks

U.S. regulatory capital: Basel III liquidity coverage ratio final rule

Basel III Leverage Ratio: U.S. Proposes American Add-on; Basel Committee Proposes Important Denominator Changes

Information on Capital Structure, Liquidity and Leverage Ratios as per Basel III Framework. as at March 31, 2015 PUBLIC

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision

BASEL III - LEVERAGE RATIO 31 December 2015

UBS Group AG (consolidated) BIS Basel III leverage ratio information

Table 1. Date: As at 31 March 2016 Summary comparison of accounting assets versus leverage ratio exposure measure

Note: The agencies revised this guide on July 18, 2013, to correct an error on page 8, Table 4, Comparison of Risk Weights of the Current Rule with

U.S. Basel III: Guide for Community Banks

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Basel III leverage ratio framework and disclosure requirements

Information on Capital Structure, Liquidity Coverage and Leverage Ratios as per Basel-III Framework as at March 31, 2016

U.S. Basel III Capital Proposed Rules and Market Risk Final Rule: Out with the Old, In with the New

SCHEDULE RC-R -- REGULATORY CAPITAL

Regulatory Capital Interim Final Rule

Securitization Perspectives: Final U.S. Liquidity Coverage Ratio. September 10, 2014

SCHEDULE RC-R REGULATORY CAPITAL

Risk & Capital Management under Basel III

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision

Financial Stability Oversight Council. Staff Guidance. Methodologies Relating to Stage 1 Thresholds. June 8, 2015

BNY Mellon Third Quarter 2015 Financial Highlights

Liquidity Coverage Ratio: A Quick Reference. February 2015

Basel III Pillar 3 and Leverage Ratio disclosures of ALTERNA BANK

US Bank Regulators Propose Net Stable Funding Ratio Rule to Enhance Financial System Resiliency

Supporting Statement for the Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income (FFIEC 031 and FFIEC 041; OMB No )

FDIC-FRB-OCC Banker Teleconference on Proposed Call Report Risk-Weighted Assets Reporting Changes. June 27, 2014

Supporting Statement for the Consolidated Financial Statements for Holding Companies (FR Y-9C; OMB No )

Regulatory Practice Letter November 2014 RPL 14-20

OCC Lending Limits Final Rule: Credit Exposures from Derivatives and Securities Financing Transactions

DG FISMA CONSULTATION PAPER ON FURTHER CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NSFR IN THE EU

Final look. A practical guide to the Federal Reserve s enhanced prudential standards for foreign banks

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Ninth progress report on adoption of the Basel regulatory framework

(refer AGN Standardised Approach to Credit Risk: Riskweighted

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Consultative Document. Revisions to the Basel III leverage ratio framework. Issued for comment by 6 July 2016

FR Y-14 Basel III and Dodd-Frank Schedule Instructions

Capital adequacy ratios for banks - simplified explanation and

Consultation Paper on Liquidity Coverage Ratio Disclosure Requirements

The $500 Million Question. Proactive Planning for Consolidated Capital Requirements. By: Lowell W. Harrison and Derek W. McGee

Comments on the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision s Consultative Document: Supervisory framework for measuring and controlling large exposures

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Basel III: the net stable funding ratio

Basel III Pillar 3 Regulatory Capital Disclosures

FDIC-FRB-OCC Banker Teleconference on Regulatory Capital Reporting Changes: Revised Call Report Schedule RC-R

Report Regarding Situation of Soundness in Management. as of September 30, 2015

Basis of the Financial Stability Oversight Council s Final Determination Regarding General Electric Capital Corporation, Inc.

TD Bank Financial Group Q4/08 Guide to Basel II

Capital Requirements Directive IV Framework Leverage Ratio. Allen & Overy Client Briefing Paper 16 January

Summary of GE Capital s SIFI Rescission Request

Bank of Queensland Limited

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Frequently asked questions on Basel III monitoring

Basel II, Pillar 3 Disclosure for Sun Life Financial Trust Inc.

TABLE 1: SCOPE OF APPLICATION Capital Deficiencies (Table 1, (e))

Basel III and Its Impact on Broker-Dealers

EBA/CP/2013/ Consultation Paper

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Frequently asked. monitoring

Expanded Community Bank Guide to the New Capital Rule for FDIC-Supervised Banks

TD Bank Financial Group Q1/08 Guide to Basel II

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision

The Northern Trust Company, Canada Basel III Pillar lll Disclosure as at December 31, 2015

HSBC North America Holdings Inc Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review and Annual Company-Run Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Results

SECURITIES AND FUTURES ACT (CAP. 289)

Quarterly Financial Supplement - 1Q 2016

Interagency Guidance on Funds Transfer Pricing Related to Funding and Contingent Liquidity Risks. March 1, 2016

Capital Cost Implications of Pending and Proposed Regulatory Changes

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Frequently asked questions on Basel III monitoring. February 2013 BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS

Net Stable Funding Ratio

Supporting Statement for the. (Proprietary Trading and Certain Interests in and Relationships with Covered Funds) (Reg VV; OMB No.

18,343 18,308 3 Accumulated other comprehensive income (and other reserves)

Treatment of segregated margin in the calculation of centrally cleared derivatives exposures under the Basel III Leverage Ratio

FEDERAL RESERVE AND FDIC PROPOSE NEW RULES REGARDING PREPARATION OF LIVING WILLS

Discover Bank. FDIC IDI Rule. Resolution Plan Public Section

DRAFT September specified in the ADI s IRB approval, application of the FIRB approach to one or more of its SL sub-asset classes.

Pillar 3 Disclosures. (OCBC Group As at 31 December 2014)

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Consultative Document. Basel III: The Net Stable Funding Ratio. Issued for comment by 11 April 2014

BASEL III PILLAR 3 CAPITAL ADEQUACY AND RISKS DISCLOSURES AS AT 30 SEPTEMBER 2015

Capital Adequacy: Asset Risk Charge

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Frequently Asked Questions on Basel III s January 2013 Liquidity Coverage Ratio framework

THE REGULATORY LANDSCAPE IS CHANGING, ARE YOU READY? RECENT UPDATES TO PRA AND TLAC STANDARDS

Transcription:

U.S. regulatory capital: Basel III supplementary leverage ratio final rule Key highlights for advanced approaches banks October 2014

Contents U.S. Basel III supplementary leverage ratio (SLR) rule is finalized key highlights 1 Observations and impacts from the final rule Implementation and reporting timelines Ratio overview and calculation frequency What s next for SLR? SLR denominator components highlights: On-balance sheet exposures Derivatives exposures Repo-style exposures Other off-balance sheet exposures 1 On September 3, 2014, the Federal Reserve (Fed), Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) released Regulatory Capital Rules: Regulatory Capital, Revisions to the Supplementary Leverage Ratio. The Fed, OCC and FDIC (collectively U.S. regulators ) adopted the SLR as a final rule. 2 U.S. regulatory capital: Basel III SLR final rule

U.S. Basel III SLR rule is finalized key highlights Relief provided on calculation frequency of off-balance sheet components Calculation frequency for off-balance sheet components provides operational relief for banks month-end averages to be used instead of daily averages The final rule is generally consistent with the notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR); however, further explains the total leverage exposure calculation for certain components of derivatives and repostyle transactions- including treatment of agency transactions with affiliates, cash variation margins, forward agreements for repo-style transactions, etc. Still some interpretation issues remain regarding derivatives and repo-style transactions, as well as calculation frequency/timing, and are being discussed and raised through industry forums Reporting and effective timelines remain unchanged for advanced approaches institutions 2 Compliance with minimum ratios and buffers remains Q1, 2018 (same for foreign banking organizations (FBOs)) Reporting of SLR to U.S. regulators in FR Y-14Q/A continues and for Q3, 2014 using new schedule (Q1, 2017 for FBOs) For non-fbo advanced approaches institutions SLR reporting starts Q1, 2015 regardless of parallel run status. Public disclosures also require explanation of differences from total consolidated accounting assets 2 This SLR rule will apply to all Basel III advanced approach banks (i.e. $250 billion in total assets or $10 billion in foreign exposure). While FBOs that need to form an intermediate holding company(ihc) (i.e. with U.S. non-branch assets of $50 billion) are able to opt out from advanced approaches capital ratio calculation, as per the enhanced prudential standards rules issued in February 2014 and further clarified in FAQs, they will still be subject to all other requirements applicable to advanced approach banks, including SLR requirements, if they exceed the relevant size thresholds. 3 U.S. regulatory capital: Basel III SLR final rule

Observations and impacts from the final rule SLR will be a relevant backstop for advanced approaches banking institutions U.S. SLR is generally aligned to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) ratio, however the U.S. G-SIBs 3 are subject to higher minimum ratios compared to their foreign peers; ensuring that the SLR remains a relevant backstop for these firms Compared to risk-based capital measures, SLR creates binding constrains on certain types of exposures for example low-risk assets, repo-style transactions, etc. Impacts may be more pronounced for FBO advanced approaches institutions that have large brokerdealer operations Existing U.S. leverage ratio is still applicable but will be generally less binding than the SLR U.S. compliance dates are aligned for FBO and non-fbo advanced approaches institutions but crossjurisdictional rule nuances cause further complexity to manage 3 Eight U.S. bank holding companies (BHCs) identified by the Financial Stability Board as global systemically important banks (U.S. G-SIBs) as well as their U.S. insured depository institutions (IDIs) subsidiaries are subject to enhanced SLR standards (eslr). eslr requires these BHCs to maintain a minimum 3% ratio + 2% buffer and requires their IDIs to maintain a 6% ratio to be considered well-capitalized. 4 U.S. regulatory capital: Basel III SLR final rule

U.S. SLR & eslr minimum ratios FBO adv. approaches U.S. effective dates Non-FBO adv. approaches U.S. rule publications Implementation and reporting timelines SLR and eslr implementation timelines remain unchanged July Basel III final rules published May eslr final rule published Sept SLR final rule published SLR NPR published Jan SLR disclosures Reporting of SLR to U.S. regulators in FR Y-14Q/A since 2013 FR Y-9C / Call reports FFIEC 101 Pillar 3 public disclosures Jan SLR compliance SLR min ratios eslr min ratios Reporting of SLR to U.S. regulators in FR Y-14A starting 2017 IHC SLR compliance & disclosure SLR min ratios eslr min ratios 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 0% 3% min 3% min 3% add-on* 3% min BHC IDI BHC IDI U.S.SLR institutions 2018 minimum ratios 2% buffer 3% min U.S. eslr institutions Add on Applicability U.S. SLR institutions are defined as: Banking organizations with $250 billion in total consolidated assets or $10 billion of on-balance sheet foreign exposures (i.e. U.S. Basel III advanced approaches BHCs and IDIs) Including FBOs with IHCs that meet advanced approaches requirements U.S. eslr institutions are defined as: G-SIB BHCs with > $700 billion in consolidated total assets or > $10 trillion in assets under custody (eslr BHC) IDI subsidiary of these eslr BHCs (eslr IDI) * For IDIs to be considered well-capitalized 5 U.S. regulatory capital: Basel III SLR final rule

Ratio calculation overview The final rule calculation is largely consistent with the NPR Supplementary leverage ratio = Tier 1 capital Total leverage exposure Main components of total leverage exposure: On-balance sheet exposures (excluding derivatives and repo-style) The balance sheet carrying value of on-balance sheet assets Amounts deducted from tier 1 capital are subtracted Derivatives exposures 4 Replacement cost for derivative exposures Potential future exposure (PFE) amounts for each derivative contract to which the bank is counterparty Collateral adjustments and additional deductions Effective notional amount of sold credit derivatives Gross value of receivables of repo-style transactions Repo-style exposures 4 Certain on-balance sheet netting benefits or offsets Counterparty credit risk for repo-style transactions Exposure for repo-style transactions where bank is acting as an agent Other off-balance sheet exposures (excluding derivatives and repo-style) The notional amount of other off-balance sheet exposures multiplied by the credit conversion factors (CCFs) under the standardized approach Minimum 10% CCF (i.e., for unconditionally cancellable commitments) 4 includes transactions with central counterparties (CCP) 6 U.S. regulatory capital: Basel III SLR final rule

Total leverage exposure breakdown A high-level representation of the ratio denominator Supplementary leverage ratio = Tier 1 capital Total leverage exposure On-balance sheet exposures Derivatives exposures Repo-style exposures + + + Other off-balance sheet exposures On-balance sheet amount (excluding derivatives and repo-style) Replacement cost Gross value of receivables Off-balance sheet amount (excluding derivatives and repo-style) - + - x Tier 1 deductions for SLR PFE On-balance sheet netting benefits/offsets Basel III standardized approach CCFs (subject to 10% floor) +/- + Collateral adjustments Counterparty credit risk + + Sold credit derivatives Agent adjustments 7 U.S. regulatory capital: Basel III SLR final rule

Changes in calculation frequency On-balance sheet frequency remains the same, modifications to off-balance sheet and numerator calculation frequency Total leverage exposure is calculated as the mean of on-balance sheet assets calculated as of each day of the reporting quarter, plus the mean of the off-balance sheet assets calculated as of the last day of each of the most recent three months minus applicable deductions defined in the Basel III capital rule SLR component SLR NPR SLR final rule Tier 1 capital As of the last day of the reporting quarter As of the last day of the reporting quarter 5 Tier 1 capital deductions for SLR As of the last day of the previous reporting quarter As of the last day of the reporting quarter 5 On-balance sheet assets (excluding derivatives and repostyle) Derivatives Repo-Style Other off-balance sheet (excluding derivatives and repostyle) Daily average for the reporting quarter Daily average for the reporting quarter Daily average for on-balance sheet components for the reporting quarter 5 Month-end average for off-balance sheet components for the reporting quarter Daily average for on-balance sheet components for the reporting quarter 5 Month-end average for off-balance sheet components for the reporting quarter Month-end average for the reporting quarter 5 The calculation frequency of these components is not clear from the SLR final rule and is being discussed and raised through industry forums. Clarification may occur with further confirmations from U.S. regulators and future publication of updated reporting forms/instructions. 8 U.S. regulatory capital: Basel III SLR final rule

What s next for SLR The final rule represents a milestone, but additional changes expected With timelines finalized banks will need to continue to make SLR compliance a high-priority: For banks which have already made substantial implementation progress based on NPR; incremental changes are needed for regulatory reporting readiness (including reconciliation challenges across reports) SLR interpretation issues need to be resolved and future SLR changes expected, including: Off-balance sheet calculation frequency to be monitored; U.S. regulators will revisit the monthly calculation frequency if there are supervisory concerns, especially for institution subject to eslr Future phased-out of current exposure method (CEM); U.S. regulators will consider changes to total leverage exposure to incorporate BCBS standardized approach for measuring counterparty credit exposures (SA-CCR) Broader U.S. rule making continues and continues to redefine regulatory targets for institutions, including: Anticipated U.S. G-SIB capital buffers, which may further raise minimum ratios for the largest banks Upcoming short-term wholesale funding limitations, and long-term debt requirements Liquidity coverage ratios was finalized along with SLR, but net stable funding ratio (NSFR) is outstanding Finalization of financial sector concentration limits Implementing numerical floors for collateral haircuts in securities financing transactions (SFTs) 9 U.S. regulatory capital: Basel III SLR final rule

SLR denominator components highlights On-balance sheet exposures Derivatives exposures Repo-style exposures Other off-balance sheet exposures

On-balance sheet exposures On-balance sheet exposures (excluding derivatives and repo-style) = On-balance sheet amount - Amounts deducted from Tier 1 capital for SLR Key considerations for main components of on-balance sheet exposures: On-balance sheet assets On-balance sheet amount On-balance sheet carrying value (excluding derivative and repo-style transactions, but including cash collateral received in derivative transactions): On-balance sheet exposures generally include loans, investments (debt securities, equity), trading assets, other assets (cash, fixed assets) etc. Basel III capital numerator Amounts deducted from tier 1 capital for SLR All amounts deducted from Basel III tier 1 capital except for: Accumulated net gain and add any accumulated net loss on cash flow hedges included in accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) that relate to the hedging of items that are not recognized at fair value on the balance sheet Net gain and add any net loss related to changes in the fair value of liabilities that are due to changes in the bank s own credit risk 11 U.S. regulatory capital: SLR final rule

Derivative exposures Derivative exposures = Replacement cost + PFE +/ - Collateral adjustment + Effective notional (for sold credit derivatives) Key considerations for main components of derivatives exposures: Single derivatives Netted derivatives Cash received Cash provided Sold credit derivatives 6 Cleared6 1. Guarantee client 2. Guarantee CCP Replacement cost Current exposure of the derivative contract (positive mark to market) Current exposure after onbalance sheet netting, excluding cash margin offsets Guarantee of client or CCP performance treated as single or netted derivatives PFE PFE = credit conversion factor x notional principal PFE adjusted = 0.4 x A Gross + 0.6 x net-to-gross ratio x A Gross Where: A Gross is the sum of individual PFEs for netted derivatives For single derivatives, set PFE to zero For netted derivatives reduce A gross in PFE by credit derivative notional amount Guarantee of client or CCP performance treated as single or netted derivatives Collateral adjustment Reduce exposure by the liability related to cash margin received, when margin meets specified SLR criteria Increase exposure by cash posted, when margin is being used to offset liabilities and does not meet specified SLR criteria Guarantee of client or CCP performance treated as single or netted derivatives Effective notional Include effective notional Reduce by fair value change that is recognized in tier 1 capital Reduce by purchase protection of same asset, etc. 6 Exposure to affiliates due to agency transactions, and the effective notional principal amount of sold credit protection cleared with a CCP on behalf of a client, can be excluded from total leverage exposure calculations 12 U.S. regulatory capital: SLR final rule

Repo-style exposures Repo-style exposures = Gross value of receivables - Netting benefits / offsets + Counterparty credit risk + Agent adjustments Key considerations for main components of repo-style exposures: Acting as a principal (single agreement) 7 Acting as a principal (netted agreement) 7 Acting as an agent (with bank acting as guarantor) 8 Gross value of receivables Gross fair value of receivables owed to the bank under repo-style transactions Gross fair value of receivables owed to the bank under repo-style transactions On-balance sheet netting benefits/ offsets Benefits due to on-balance sheet netting of repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements, if transactions meet specified criteria Counterparty credit risk Max {0, [E - C]} Where: E is the gross fair value of receivables C is the associated received collateral (and uses collateral received value) Max {0, [ΣE - ΣC]} Where: E is the gross fair value of receivables C is the associated received collateral (and uses collateral received value) Agent adjustments Counterparty credit risk exposure to the counterparty of the customer, plus any additional guarantee provided as an agent 7 Off-balance sheet repo-style transactions that are treated as a sale under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), will be treated as repo-style exposures and not as derivatives or other off-balance sheet exposures, for SLR calculation 8 Counterparty credit risk for agency repo-style transactions only needs to be calculated when the bank indemnifies the customer 13 U.S. regulatory capital: SLR final rule

Other off-balance sheet exposures Other off-balance sheet exposures (excluding derivatives and repo-style) = CCF adjusted notional Gross = X notional Basel III Standardized CCF % Key considerations for main components of other off-balance sheet exposures: Other off-balance sheet exposures Gross notional amount Off-balance sheet amounts (excluding derivative and repo-style transactions): Off-balance sheet exposures generally include undrawn commitments, letters of credit, guarantees, forward agreements, reference asset for equity and sold credit derivatives etc. Gross notional amount x CCF % Where: CCFs based on Basel III standardized rules using maturity and exposure type subject to 10% floor CCF adjusted notional amount Off-balance sheet exposure Commitments that are unconditionally cancelable by the banking organization Commitments with original maturity of 1 year that are not unconditionally cancellable by the banking organization Self-liquidating trade-related contingent items that arise from the movement of goods with original maturity of 1 year Commitments with original maturity of > 1 year that are not unconditionally cancellable by the banking organization Transaction-related contingent items, including performance bonds, bid bonds, warranties and standby letters of credit Guarantees, credit-enhancing representations and warranties that are not securitization exposures, financial standby letters of credit and forward agreements CCF 10% (floor) 20% 50% 100% 14 U.S. regulatory capital: SLR final rule

This presentation contains general information only and Deloitte is not, by means of this presentation, rendering accounting, business, financial, investment, legal, tax, or other professional advice or services. This presentation is not a substitute for such professional advice or services, nor should it be used as a basis for any decision or action that may affect your business. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your business, you should consult a qualified professional advisor. Deloitte shall not be responsible for any loss sustained by any person who relies on this presentation. 15 U.S. regulatory capital: SLR final rule

Contacts Alok Sinha Managing Principal Leader, Banking & Securities Deloitte & Touche LLP +1 415 783 5203 asinha@deloitte.com Lakshmanan Balachander Principal Banking & Securities Deloitte & Touche LLP +1 212 436 5340 lbalachander@deloitte.com Carrie Cheadle Director Banking & Securities Deloitte & Touche LLP + 1 312 486 4095 ccheadle@deloitte.com Irena Gecas-McCarthy Principal Banking & Securities Deloitte & Touche LLP +1 212 436 5316 igecasmccarthy@deloitte.com Andrea di Giovanni Director Banking & Securities Deloitte & Touche LLP +1 212 436 7095 andigiovanni@deloitte.com Alex Brady Principal Banking & Securities Deloitte & Touche LLP +1 415 783 5413 alebrady@deloitte.com David Wright Director Banking & Securities Deloitte & Touche LLP +1 415 783 4123 davidmwright@deloitte.com 16 U.S. regulatory capital: SLR final rule

About Deloitte Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, a UK private company limited by guarantee ( DTTL ), its network of member firms, and their related entities. DTTL and each of its member firms are legally separate and independent entities. DTTL (also referred to as Deloitte Global ) does not provide services to clients. Please see www.deloitte.com/about for a detailed description of DTTL and its member firms. Please see www.deloitte.com/us/about for a detailed description of the legal structure of Deloitte LLP and its subsidiaries. Certain services may not be available to attest clients under the rules and regulations of public accounting. 36 USC 220506 Member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited 17 U.S. regulatory capital: SLR final rule