QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS REGARDING JAPANESE PATENT PRACTICE TABLE OF CONTENTS



Similar documents
Japanese Opposition System

Maine Cernota & Rardin, Registered Patent Attorneys 547 Amherst St., 3 rd Floor, Nashua, NH info@mcr-ip.com

GUIDELINES FOR THE CUSTOMIZATION OF THE PATENT GUIDE INVENTING THE FUTURE - AN INTRODUCTION TO PATENTS FOR SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES

PATENT LITIGATION IN MEXICO: OVERVIEW AND STRATEGY

PROCEDURES AND COSTS FOR PATENTS

CANADA Patent Rules as amended by SOR/

PCT PRACTICE International Applications Filed Prior to January 1, 2004

Table of Contents CLAUDIA MILBRADT 1 ANETTE GARTNER 3

The Chinese Patent Law and ITS Comparison with the US Patent Law

Ryerson Digital Media Zone Online Resources Patent Essentials

European Patenting Practice... with a view on USPTO Differences. Michael Schneider European Patent Attorney Eversheds, Munich

International Patent Litigation and Jurisdiction. Study of Hypothetical Question 1 Under the Hague Draft Convention and Japanese Laws

Schneps, Leila; Colmez, Coralie. Math on Trial : How Numbers Get Used and Abused in the Courtroom. New York, NY, USA: Basic Books, p i.

Present Situation of IP Disputes in Japan

European Patent Office / State Intellectual Property Office of the People s Republic of China

9 Summary of California Law (10th), Corporations

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT)

Experiences with the Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) at the USPTO

Intellectual Property

Chapter 1800 Patent Cooperation Treaty

Quality Management Manual for Patent Examination. (Quality Manual)

Norway Advokatfirmaet Grette

EGYPTIAN PATENT OFFICE

The Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) Program

Patent Litigation. Quick Guide to Proceedings in Germany HEUKING KÜHN LÜER WOJTEK

Memory Stick and Memory Stick PRO Player/Recorder Connector A G R E E M E N T

What every product manager should know about Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyrights, Trademarks. Varun A. Shah Patent Attorney

Patent Term Extensions and Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPCs) Latest developments in Japan

How to Litigate a Writ of Mandate Case

Title 31 MARYLAND INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION

The USPTO: Patent Application and Examination Processes

Tsubame Patent Attorney Firm at a Glance. Tsubame Patent Attorney Firm Registered Patent Attorney Itsuki Shimbo PhD.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING COMPLAINT BY PRISONERS UNDER THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT, 42 U.S.C.

Trends in Patent Litigation in India

IP Litigation in Europe and in Germany

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CORPORATION OF MALAYSIA

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE (SERBIA)

LITTLE TRAVERSE BAY BANDS OF ODAWA INDIANS

LR Case management pilot program for criminal cases. A. Scope; application. This is a special pilot rule governing time limits for criminal

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW PARALEGAL

TECHNOLOGY CHECKLIST FOR COMPANY MANAGERS AND COUNSEL

Intellectual Property, Patents & Trademarks March 20, Big ideas SMU

Supreme Court, Appellate Division First Judicial Department 61 Broadway New York, New York (212) (212) FAX

FALSE CLAIMS ACT STATUTORY LANGUAGE

SUMMARY OF CONTENTS. C o m m o n R e p re s e n t a t i o n C o n f l i c t s

Legal FAQ: Introduction to Patent Litigation

CIVIL APPEALS PAMPHLET PRO BONO PROJECT FOR THE SPONSORED AND ADMINISTERED BY THE PRO BONO COMMITTEES FOR THE STATE BAR OF TEXAS APPELLATE SECTION

Case 1:12-cv SLR Document 8 Filed 03/09/12 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 216 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

2 California Evidence (5th), Discovery

One Hundred Twelfth Congress of the United States of America

Rules of the City of New York Title 61 - Office of Collective Bargaining Chapter 1 - Practice and Procedure

PRETRIAL LITIGATION IN A NUTSHELL. R. LAWRENCE DESSEM Professor of Law University of Tennessee ST. PAUL, MINN. WEST PUBLISHING CO.

AN ACT IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SYLLABUS FOR THREE MONTHS INSTITUTIONAL TRAINING OF EXAMINERS OF PATENTS & DESIGNS

Submission on Proposals for Privilege Protection and Self-Regulation for Patent and Trade-mark Agents

Institutional Certified Evaluation and Accreditation of Universities General Principles:

Patent Litigation. Inventions of mission and additional remuneration due to the inventor for such inventions

PATENTS. Pharmaceutical Product Patenting Strategies

PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT)

STATE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE OF THE PEOPLE S REPUBLIC OF CHINA

DOUBLE PATENTING CONSIDERATIONS by Mark Cohen

Part II. Application not searched. Application not searched due to the presence of certain subject matter

Privacy Impact Assessment Of the. Office of Inspector General Information Technology Infrastructure Systems

Chapter 307. (Senate Bill 585) Commercial Law Patent Infringement Assertions Made in Bad Faith

Patent Litigation Strategy: The Impact of the America Invents Act and the New Post-grant Patent Procedures

PART 3. PROCEDURAL ASPECT OF TRADEMARK LAW

An Agricultural Law Research Note

The Criminal Procedure Rules Part 17 as in force on 2 February 2015 PART 17 EXTRADITION

How To License A Patent From Ancient Recipe Cards

Texas Medicaid Fraud Prevention Act

STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2012 No. _

Trends in Global Patent Litigation

RARITAN VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE ACADEMIC COURSE OUTLINE FAMILY LAW LEGL-124

How to Get a Eurasian Patent

Shigeru ITOH Itoh & Associates

Joint Position on the Disclosure of Clinical Trial Information via Clinical Trial Registries and Databases 1 Updated November 10, 2009

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN JAPAN

Patent Litigation in Europe - Presence and Future

PATENT INFORMATION. Cameron IP

LEGAL COUNSEL OFFICE OF NATIONAL DRUG CONTROL POLICY FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT ANNUAL REPORT. Fiscal Year 2011

SMALL CLAIMS RULES. (d) Record of Proceedings. A record shall be made of all small claims court proceedings.


IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

Professional Solutions Insurance Company. Business Associate Agreement re HIPAA Rules

Privilege - pitfalls and obstacles for clients operating in multiple jurisdictions

DUE DILIGENCE IN TRANSACTIONS INVOLVING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 1. Edward A. Meilman James W. Brady, Jr. Jamie Ryerson Dickstein Shapiro LLP

Transcription:

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS REGARDING JAPANESE PATENT PRACTICE TABLE OF CONTENTS QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS compiled by the International Activities Center of the Japan Patent Attorneys Association I. APPLICATION (i) Proxy P.1 Q1. Representing Competitors Q2. Pro Se (Self representation) Application (ii) Formality P.2 Q3. When Corporate Nationality Certificate Cannot be Notarized Q4. Electronic Filing Q5. Filing Application in Foreign Language (iii)specification and Claims P.4 Q6. Format for the Specification Q7. "Summary of Invention Q8. Essential Description in Summary of Invention Q9. Plural Advantages Q10. Claim Format Q11. Multiple Dependency Q12. Dependent Claims Q13. Independent Claims Q14. Claim Categories (iv)divisional Application P.6 Q15. When a Divisional Application Can Be Filed Q16. Requirements for Divisional Application Q17. Conversion to Utility Model Application (v)priority P.11 Q18. Inventors to be included

Q19. Omitted Priority Q20. Claiming Both U.S. and Japanese Priorities Q21. Hypothetical Case and Discussion Q22. Hypothetical Case and Discussion, Continued (vi)internal Priority P.15 Q23. How Internal Priority is Claimed Q24. How is Double Patenting Avoided in the Case of the Internal Priority? (vi)national Phase Entry of PCT Application P.15 Q25. Nationalizing a PCT Application (vii) Utility Model P.16 Q26. Outlines of Utility Model System in Japan Q27. Conversion between Utility Model Application and Patent Application Q28. Double Registration (Branch Off) (viii) Fees P.19 Q29. Official Fees Calculation Q30. Additional Fees for Multiple Dependent Claim Q31. Attorney's Fees (ix) Others P.20 Q32. Non-Inventor s Application Q33. Non-Inventor's Patent Right Q34. Recovery against Non-Inventor's Application/Patent Right Q35. Time vs. Day II. EXAMINATION II.1 Patentability (i) Statutory Requirements P.22 Q36. Statutory Requirements (ii) Unity of Invention P.22 Q37. Unity of Invention

(iii) Enablement Requirement P.23 Q38. Enablement requirement Q39. Incorporation by Reference (IBR) Q40. Number of Working Examples Needed to Satisfy the Enablement Requirement Q41. Best Mode of Practicing the Invention Q42. Advantageous effects or merits of the invention (iv) Support Requirement P.24 Q43. Extent of Disclosure in the Description and Drawings vs. Broadness of Claims Q44. Undue Breadth (Claims Reading on Inoperative Subject Matter) Q45. Burden of Proof on Support Requirement (v) Clarity Requirement P.25 Q46. Definition by Function Q47. Definition of Terms Q48.Recitation in Optional Form Q49.Use of Ambiguous Terms Q50.Claims Attempting to Define the Invention by Objectives to be Attained Q51.Devices or Products with Limitations on Their Usage (vi) Novelty P.26 Q52. Novelty Q53. Details of Novelty Requirements Q54. Date of Publication of a Paper Submitted to a Journal Q55. Oral Presentation Q56. Grace Period Q57. Presentation via Internet Q58. Presentation Outside Japan Q59. Procedures for Grace Period Q60. Document published during Grace Period (vii) Inventive Step P.29 Q61. Inventive Step in Japan Q62. Definition of Person Skilled in the Art Q63. Additional Experimental Data Q64. Inventive Step in Selective invention

(viii) Unpublished Prior Art (Disclosed in Unpublished Prior Application, Art. 29-2) P.31 Q65. Unpublished Prior Art Q66. Self-Collision (Exemption of Art. 29-2) Q67. Foreign Unpublished Prior Art Q68. Priority vs. Unpublished Prior Art (ix) First to File Rule P.32 Q69. First to File or First to Invent (x) Specific Technical Field; Chemistry, Medicine and Biotechnology P.32 Q70. Written Requirement for invention Concerning New Compound Q71. Second Use of a Known Pharmaceutical Composition Q72. Enablement Requirement for Medicine Q73. Pharmacological Data Q74. Physical-Chemical Data Q75. Physical data or Test Data of a Compound Q76. Later filed supportive Data Q77. Paper or Prophetic Examples Q78. Deposit of Microorganism or Biotech Material Q79. Sequence Listing Q80. Transgenic Animals (xi) Specific Technical Field; CII (Computer Implemented Inventions) P.38 Q81. Statutory Requirements for CII Q82. Claim Categories of CII Q83. Pure Algorithms or Program Listings Q84. Drafting Claims and Specification II.2 Prosecution (i) Request for Substantive Examination P.39 Q85. Who can file a request for substantive examination? Q86. When the request should be filed? Q87. Queuing Time for First Office Action (ii) Expedition P.40 Q88. What kinds of Expeditions are available?

Q89. What is preferential examination? Q90. What is accelerated examination? Q91. What is super-accelerated examination? Q92. Preferential Examination vs. Accelerated Examination (iii) Office Action P.42 Q93. Non-final OA vs. Final OA Q94. Decision for Dismissal of Amendments Q95. Notice of Reasons for Rejection on Violation of Requirements for Disclosure of Q96. Decision of rejection Q97. Decision to Grant a Patent Q98. Declarations to Support Broad Claims (iv) Extension of Time P.43 Q99. Extension of Time for Responding to OA Q100. Request for Extension of Time (v) Amendments P.44 Q101. When can amendments be filed? Q102. Requirements for Amendment in response to non-final OA Q103. Requirements for Amendment after Final OA Q104. Requirements for Amendment When Filing an Appeal against Decision of Rejection Q105. Amending Junior Application to Have it Read on Senior Application (Senior Q106. Amending Japanese claims to Parallel Issued Foreign Claims Q107. Advantage of Paralleling Issued Foreign Claims Q108. Further Narrowing the Paralleled Claims Q109. New Matter Q110. Amendment Changing Special Technical Feature Q111. Amendments Challenged by Third Parties (vi) Argument (Remarks) P.48 Q112. Time Frames for Reply to OA Q113. Affidavits to Evidence the Knowledge of a Person Skilled in the Art (vii) Interview P.49 Q114. Interview Recommended

Q115. Recommended Strategy (viii) Donation of Information P.49 Q116. When can the information be submitted? Q117. Who can submit the information? Q118. What kind of information can be submitted? Q119. Feedback of Donation of Information Q120. Notification to Applicant of Donation of Information Q121. Effect of Donation of Information Q122. Disadvantages of Donation of information (ix) Appeal against Examiner's Decision of Rejection P.51 Q123. Filing an Appeal against Examiner's Decision of Rejection Q124. Amendments Q125. Reconsideration by Examiner before Appeal Q126. Shin-Jin (questioning/interrogation by an appeal board) Q127. Documentary Proceeding Q128. Appeal Decision (x)suit against Appeal Decision P.52 Q129. General Requirements for Suit against Appeal Decision Q130. Amendment, Divisional Application Q131. Complaints against the IP High Court Decision (xi)registration, Term and Maintenance of Patent Right P.52 Q132. Registration Q133. Term and Maintenance of Patent right Q134. How to Know Maintenance / Expiration of Registration Q135. Registration of Extension of Term of Patent Right III PATENT RIGHTS III.1 Infringement P.55 Q136. Implementation Q137. Remedies for Patent Infringement Q138. Injunction Q139. Damages

Q140. Monetary Recovery Before the Issuance of the Patent Q141. Defendant s Defense Q142. Claim Interpretation Q143. Doctrine of equivalence Q144. Prosecution history estoppels Q145. Doctrine of Claim Differentiation Q146. Emphasis of Advantageous Effect Q147. Reference Numerals in Claims III.2 Trial for Patent Invalidation P.59 Q148. Trial for patent invalidation Q149. Grounds for Patent Invalidation Q150. Who can request a trial for patent invalidation? Q151. When can a trial for patent invalidation be requested? Q152. Amendments Q153. Complaints against a Trial Decision III.3 Trial for Correction P.61 Q154. Trial for Correction Q155. What kind of correction can be requested? Q156. Who can file a request for a trial for correction? Q157. When can a trial for correction be requested? Q158. Complaints against a Trial Dismissal III.4 Administrative Opinion, others P.62 Q159. Administrative Opinion Q160. Who can request an administrative opinion to the JPO? Q161. Complaints against an Administrative Opinion Q162. Trial for Invalidation of Registration of Extension of Term of Patent Right Q163. Retrial

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS REGARDING JAPANESE PATENT PRACTICE FIRST EDITION 1993 1992 AND 1993 US/JAPAN PATENT PRACTICE COMMITTEE SECOND EDITION 1998 1996 AND 1997 INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES COMMITTEE THIRD GROUP THIRD EDITION 2007 2007 INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES CENTER FORTH EDITION 2012 2012 INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES CENTER JAPAN PATENT ATTORNEYS ASSOCIATION 3-4-2 Kasumigaseki Chiyoda-ku Tokyo 100-0013, JAPAN http://www.jpaa.or.jp/