Tumbes-Choco-Magdalena Biodiversity Hotspot Chocó-Manabi Conservation Corridor. Program for Consolidation



Similar documents
How To Manage Protected Areas

Monitoring for Conservation Planning and Management. Environmental Evaluators Forum EPA Headquarters, USA June 14 15, 2007

United States-Peru Environmental Cooperation Work Program

Projects that promote the conservation and/or sustainable use of endemic species. 3

How To Be Sustainable With Tourism

Tracking Tool for SFM/REDD- Plus Projects. Guidance Note v0.2

INTEGRATED NATIONAL ADAPTATION PILOT República de Colombia INAP

PARAMOS Enhancing capacities and coordination to cope with climate change effects

SELOUS TANZANIA NIASSA MOZAMBIQUE WILDLIFE- CORRIDOR

TARAPOTO PROCESS ON THE AMAZON FOREST S SUSTAINABILITY CRITERIA AND INDICATORS

FONAG The Fund for the Protection of Water, Ecuador

Advancing Sustainable Landscapes in the Andean Amazon. Adaptive Management and Monitoring and Evaluation Framework

Third-Party Forest Certification in British Columbia

THE SEVILLE STRATEGY FOR BIOSPHERE RESERVES

INFRASTRUCTURE: Examples from Brazil

Assessing Five Years of CEPF Investment in the Tropical Andes Biodiversity Hotspot Vilcabamba-Amboró Corridor

How to cite this document GNPS, GCREG, CDF, and GC Galapagos Report Puerto Ayora, Galapagos, Ecuador.

World Bank Safeguards as the Basis for Environmental and Social Risk Management

Ecosystem perspective on ORs & OCTs

Caspian Hyrcanian Forest Project GEFSEC PROJECT ID: 4470; GEF AGENCY ID: PIMS 4078; AWARD ID:

MINISTRY OF LANDS AND NATURAL RESOURCES NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE PROGRAMME (TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE- TA) DRAFT

National Tiger Recovery Program INDONESIA

Global Environment Facility GEF OPERATIONAL PROGRAM #13 ON CONSERVATION AND SUSTAINABLE USE OF BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY IMPORTANT TO AGRICULTURE

SLOW ONSET EVENTS. climate change impacts on BIODIVERSITY

Biodiversity Conservation in Egypt (Achievements of a Decade and Future Priorities)

Proceedings of the International Conference on Reducing Climate Change Challenges through Forestry and Other Land Use Practices

DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY DRAFT REVISED NATIONAL FOREST POLICY OF MALAWI

Corredores oso - CORRIDORS FOR CANTABRIAN BROWN BEAR CONSERVATION LIFE07 NAT/E/000735

The current institutional and legal context for biodiversity conservation and management is characterised by the following features:

Natural Resource Management Profile

A ROCHA INTERNATIONAL S INVOLVEMENT IN PAPUA NEW GUINEA

Sustainable Land Management in the Global Environment Facility. GEF Role as Financial Mechanism of the UNCCD

21st International Conference of The Coastal Society

Protected Area Categories and Management Objectives

Biological Diversity and Tourism: Development of Guidelines for Sustainable Tourism in Vulnerable Ecosystems

JOINT WORK PROGRAM FOR THE LEAST DEVELOPED COUNTRIES FUND AND SPECIAL CLIMATE CHANGE FUND. GEF/LDCF.SCCF.19/04 September 28, 2015

REDD+ SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PRINCIPLES AND CRITERIA

Mondelēz International Palm Oil Action Plan. Contents

Case Study: The History of the San Juan Headwaters Forest Health Partnership

SFI INC. LAUNCHES NEW STANDARD LEADS FOREST CERTIFICATION FORWARD

SAMPLE VISION, MISSION AND PURPOSE STATEMENTS

Barents Euro-Arctic Council (BEAC) Working Group on Environment Swedish Chairmanship Work Programme Subgroup for Nature Protection

The North State: Implementing the California Water Action Plan February 24, 2014

National Report to the Fourth Session of the United Nations Forum on Forests CYPRUS JANUARY 2004

SHAPING LAND-USE PRACTICES AND SUPPLY CHAINS THROUGH COMMODITY CERTIFICATION: THE EXPERIENCE OF THE RAINFOREST ALLIANCE

High Conservation Value Forests 3.1. Old Growth Forests. Management & Monitoring Framework

Inter-municipal cooperation in watershed conservation through the establishment of a regional water fund FORAGUA in Southern Ecuador

CUBA CONFRONTING CLIMATE CHANGE

1 Overview introducing global issues and legal tools through local case studies. 2 Importance of legal protections for natural areas

Terms of Reference Monitoring, Data Analysis and Reporting Consultant COAST Project

FAO-Adapt. Framework Programme on Climate Change Adaptation

Module 6: Financial Resource Mobilization for NBSAPs

Australian Government Response to the Senate Committee on Finance and Public Administration

China Protected Areas Leadership Alliance Project

the Terai Arc Landscape

JOB DESCRIPTION. Job Purpose To provide overall leadership and strategic direction to the ACORD country programme.

Subactivity: Habitat Conservation Program Element: National Wetlands Inventory

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSULTANTS/CONTRACTORS

Greening REDD+ Challenges and opportunities for forest biodiversity conservation. Workshop summary

Madagascar: Makira REDD+

REDD+ Inspiring Practices

4 Project Implementation and Monitoring

Eco-tourism and Biodiversity Conservation and Protection Management of Olango Island Wildlife Sanctuary By: Reginaldo G. Bueno

Protected Areas on Private Land: Shaping the Future of the Park System in Australia

UNEP Strategy for Latin America and the Caribbean ( )

GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF TASK(S) AND OBJECTIVES TO BE ACHIEVED

The Sustainable Soy Sourcing Guidelines Second Edition

Institutional Vision, Proposed Mandate Statement and Priority Objectives

UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME. Environment for Development

NATIONAL GRASSLANDS MANAGEMENT A PRIMER

TOWARDS A GLOBAL STRATEGY FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY OF THE PROVINCE OF CUENCA (SPAIN)

City of Fort Collins Water Supply and Demand Management Policy

National Report to the Fifth Session of the United Nations Forum on Forests TURKEY

Australian Wildlife Conservancy Yookamurra Intern Program

HEAD OF POLICY AND ADVOCACY

The Philippines WAVES pilot ecosystem accounts

Sustainability and Wildlife Conservation Updates: the Malaysian Perspectives

Karuk Tribe Integrating Traditional Ecological Knowledge within Natural Resource Management

Finance, Mining & Sustainability. The Gamsberg Zinc Project South Africa

Public Notification Letter

Key Recommendations of CVF Regional Activities

START-IRA/UDSM Education and Training Program and Externship Assessments

Transcription:

Tumbes-Choco-Magdalena Biodiversity Hotspot Chocó-Manabi Conservation Corridor Program for Consolidation May 2009 The Tumbes-Chocó-Magdalena biodiversity hotspot ranks among the highest globally for its biodiversity. It includes a wide variety of habitats, ranging from mangroves, beaches and coastal wilderness to some of the world's wettest rain forests. Scattered throughout the relatively flat coastal plain are mountain systems with unique habitats. The hotspot also is known for a high degree of cultural diversity that includes indigenous groups, people of African ancestry and mestizos. Given the hotspot s large size and diversity, the CEPF strategy as detailed in the ecosystem profile for this hotspot 1 targeted the Chocó-Manabi Conservation Corridor and specifically five sub-corridors within it. CEPF awarded 46 grants valued at $5 million from 2002 to 2007, leveraging an additional $11.4 million for the corridor. Achievements: CEPF assessed the portfolio s impact at the close of its five-year investment period for this region and rated its performance of the portfolio to be very strong 2. Several important conservation results were achieved: More than 73,500 hectares of new protected areas were created on private, community, and indigenous territories. In addition, CEPF helped to improve management on 850,000 hectares of land within existing protected areas. CEPF helped local communities adopt improved land management practices through a variety of projects, including establishing payment for ecosystem services mechanisms in indigenous territories, and promoting sustainable gold extraction, agroforestry and ecotourism. CEPF helped strengthen local and regional coordination for conservation through 40 conservation alliances that included local communities and public and private organizations. CEPF advanced a unified vision for the region through territorial planning exercises at different political levels. A bi-national effort that brought together leading nongovernmental organizations and public agencies resulted in the design of a hotspotwide monitoring system for decisionmaking, which reinforced this unified vision. 1 Ecosystem Profile, Chocó-Manabi Conservation Corridor, English www.cepf.net/documents/final.choco-darien-westernecuador.choco.ep.pdf (PDF, 1.5 MB) / Español www.cepf.net/documents/final.spanish.choco-darien-western-ecuador.choco.ep.pdf (PDF - 1.2 MB) 2 Assessing Five Years of CEPF Investment in the Tumbes-Chocó-Magdalena Biodiversity Hotspot, English www.cepf.net/documents/final_chocomanabi_assessment.march07.pdf (PDF - 822 KB) / Español www.cepf.net/documents/final_chocomanabi_assessment_march07_sp.pdf (PDF - 837 KB) 1

Justification for consolidation: While significant strides were made, the region remains highly complex and threatened. Threats to biodiversity persist and jeopardize the long-term viability of the gains made with CEPF support. For example, in the Chocó of Ecuador, old-growth forests are under grave threat by timber extraction and by conversion to African palm and teak plantations. The level of threat was not fully appreciated when the region s ecosystem profile was prepared because a road connecting the once-remote region to the Andes highlands had only recently been paved. Since that time, areas of high biological value have been converted to African palm, causing significant social conflict and deforestation (Ecuador possesses among the highest deforestation rates in the world). CEPF was instrumental in ensuring that many areas of high biological and cultural value were brought under sustainable management and protection. However, given the scale of the threat, important opportunities and needs for CEPF consolidation exist to ensure the robustness of CEPF s conservation results and to promote their scaling up. It is important to note that the Pacific coast of Colombia and Ecuador is characterized by highly impoverished, remote communities that have a long history of being underserved by donors and the government. Extensive planning and conservation work throughout the Colombian and Ecuadorian sides of the corridor with local communities were major achievements under CEPF. For example, on the Ecuadorian side of the bi-national Awa indigenous territory which harbors among the best preserved land in the Ecuadorian Chocó CEPF supported the development of management plans for six communities. These management plans were designed to help Awa communities develop their lands with sustainability and conservation as fundamental goals, rather than have the land converted for African palm and timber extraction. At the Awa s request, the Wildlife Conservation Society replicated these management plans in other areas of the indigenous territory. The Ecuadorian Awa have expressed interest in having their entire territory brought under similar community-level management plans to ensure broad consensus on the management objectives of the territory. The Awa have also expressed interest in better coordinating their binational territory with their counterparts on the Colombian side of the border, where a similar planning effort was undertaken with CEPF support. Other important opportunities exist for consolidation. For example in Colombia s Munchique - Pinche Sub-Corridor, an opportunity exists to scale up a payments for environmental services scheme in an indigenous territory of high priority for biodiversity, which is located on the upper watershed of a dam. While several important site-based needs exist for consolidation and scaling up, local stakeholders recognize that these initiatives must be complemented by development plans and policies that internalize conservation and sustainable development as fundamental goals. In Colombia, efforts need to focus on working with regional development agencies called the Regional Autonomous Corporations (CARs), which exercise authority over the corridor s development and conservation priorities. In Ecuador, significant effort needs to be focused on promoting more sustainable development policies coming out of local and national governments. Through consolidation, CEPF s objective is to reinforce and sustain the gains achieved as a result of the initial five-year investment in this important region. Based on analyses, consultation with partners and site visits, CEPF has selected three of the five original sub-corridors within the Chocó-Manabi Conservation Corridor to target consolidation based on priority needs and 2

opportunities: the sub-corridors of the bi-national region, Munchique-Pinche, and Serranía de Los Paraguas. Table 1. Investment Priorities & Activities Investment priority 1: Support the Adoption and Implementation of Management Plans and Governance Structures to Promote the Sustainability of Conservation Results in Two Sub-Corridors Implementing partners: Fondo Ambiental Nacional ($350,000), Federación de Centros Awá del Ecuador ($280,000), Fundación Altropico ($250,000), Fundación Sirua ($200,000), Corporación Serriangua ($200,000). Potential leverage: Wildlife Conservation Society, Fond Ambiental Nacional, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ), Conservation Stewards Program, Fondo de Acción Ambiental Outcome 1: Governance and management structures and plans adopted and implemented in two subcorridors: the bi-national region and Serranía de Los Paraguas. Activity Bi-National Corridor CEPF Budget: $1,280,000 In the Awa indigenous territories, support the Binational Plan de Vida (Plan for Life developed by Awa communities in Colombia and Ecuador) to strengthen binational collaboration between Colombian and Ecuadorian Awa communities, and implement and replicate site-level management plans to new areas in Awa territory. In the bi-national area of mangroves (which includes Cayapas Mataje Ecological Reserve, whose CEPF-funded management plan was recently approved by the Government of Ecuador), support implementation of key management activities (i.e., creation of local management committees and public education, improved protection), and facilitate bi-national collaboration between technical staff and communities. In Cotocachi Cayapas, establish management committees involving local communities to improve their engagement in protected areas activities. Conclude the border demarcation process in priority areas under particular threat and expand the system of volunteer park guards. In the Chachi Gran Reserve, replicate the conservation steward program to other communities to expand areas brought under agreement and maintain land use in the face of encroachment from African palm development. In the Golondrinas Protected Forest, consolidate the legalization of forest lands and create a community management committee. In the Awacachi Sub-Corridor, seek to consolidate support of local communities through conflict resolution and technical assistance in cacao production. 3

Serranía de Los Paraguas Consolidate the sub-corridor comprised of private protected areas (PPA) and a national park, by implementing management plans funded by CEPF, developing new management plans for additional PPAs, and supporting greater collaboration and capacity building among PPAs. Investment priority 2: Ensure the Compatibility of Development Processes with Biodiversity Conservation in three key sub-corridors. Implementing partners: Conservation International ($350,000), Centro de Investigación y Estudios en Biodiversidad y Recursos Geneticos ($120,000) Potential co-financing: Fondo de Acción Ambiental, Regional Development Authorities of Colombia. Outcome 2: Conservation and human welfare considerations are incorporated into local, regional and national development plans in key sub-corridors: the bi-national region, Munchique-Pinche and Serranía de Los Paraguas. Activity CEPF Budget: $470,000 Strengthen the integration of the bi-national conservation vision with the strategies and operations of key stakeholder groups (environmental and development nongovernmental organizations, research institutes, Colombian Regional Development Authorities, and municipal, provincial and national governments). Also attract more financing for conservation and sustainable development from in-country and international donors. In the bi-national corridor of Ecuador, promote development policies that are compatible with conservation in order to stem the expansion of African palm and teak in areas of importance for biodiversity. Activities to include economic analysis to examine policy options, integration of conservation into local and provincial development plans, socioeconomic and environmental monitoring of impacts, and capacity building to foster participatory decisionmaking with partners. Consolidate the inter-institutional agreement signed by Colombian and Ecuadorian organizations to share information for monitoring conservation trends in the entire hotspot. This includes capacity building and integration of the agreement with existing participants, and obtaining funds from the CARs for financing. Investment priority 3: Support the establishment and expansion of sustainable financing mechanisms Implementing partners: Centro para la Investigación en Sistemas Sostenibles de Producción Agropecuaria ($200,000), Fondo Ambiental Nacional ($350,000), Fundación Sirua ($200,000) Potential leverage: Fondo Ambiental Nacional, Fondo de Acción Ambiental, Flora & Fauna International Outcome 3: Stable funding mechanisms are operational in support of priority management needs in 4

Cotacachi Cayapas and Cayapas Mataje Ecological Reserve and three key sub-corridors: the binational region, Munchique-Pinche, and Serranía de Los Paraguas. Activity Bi-national Sub- Corridor CEPF Budget: $200,000 In the Awacachi Corridor, develop and implement a fundraising campaign to buttress contributions to the existing trust fund. Promote environmental service scheme for water provision to downstream communities. Improve the collection of existing tourism entrance fees in support of management for Cotacachi Cayapas and Cayapas Mataje protected areas. Provide technical assistance to Ecuadorian partners to help them access funding for conservation under the Plan Socio Bosque (Social Forestry Plan). Munchique-Pinche Build on current payment for environmental services scheme by expanding coverage to three adjacent communities surrounded by a protected area, document and disseminate information on the existing scheme to other parts of the corridor, and consolidate the existing scheme through capacity building of local communities. Serranía de Los Paraguas Support fundraising for a trust fund dedicated to financing conservation and sustainable development activities in the sub-corridor. Total consolidation: $1,950,000 Donor Collaboration: CEPF and its grantees are committed to collaborating with a wide variety of donors to achieve the conservation outcomes pursued under consolidation. Among the CEPF partners, the MacArthur Foundation and Global Environment Facility (GEF) have existing or planned investments that demonstrate promising opportunities for collaboration. The MacArthur Foundation recently completed a call for proposals for its Northern Andean region, which includes a funding window for the Ecuador Colombian border area. CEPF and the MacArthur Foundation have agreed to work together to ensure cooperation between grants located in the binational corridor. With respect to collaboration with the GEF, three projects are of particular interest: i. Colombian National Protected Areas Conservation Trust Fund has been in implementation since 2006, and will be targeted for potential collaboration. ii. Mainstreaming traditional knowledge associated with agrobiodiversity in Colombian agroecosystems, in preparation. 5

iii. The Sustainable Management of Biodiversity and Water Resources in the Ibarra San Lorenzo Corridor in Ecuador, scheduled for CEO endorsement and approval in November 2009. CEPF has not identified any projects financed by the governments of Japan and France or by the World Bank that offer similar opportunities for potential collaboration at this time, although effort will be made during implementation to coordinate with relevant projects. In addition, USAID and GTZ have ongoing programs that have been partners in past CEPF projects and will be targeted under consolidation for continued cooperation. Furthermore, the Colombia Fund for Environmental Action and the Ecuador s National Environmental Fund were important partners for leveraging local funds under earlier grants, and initial discussions have yielded encouraging results for similar partner relationships under consolidation. And finally, CEPF will collaborate closely with Conservation International s Global Conservation Fund in raising funds for the Awacachi trust fund. Monitoring Plan: CEPF will monitor the performance of its grantees in achieving a core set of consolidation targets as outlined below through the review of programmatic and financial progress reports and site visits to each project. The specific targets presented in Table 2 have been selected based on their relevance from the CEPF Global Results Framework. In addition, a target specific to leverage for this portfolio has been added to reflect the significant leverage goals for this consolidation portfolio.. 6

Table 2. Chocó-Manabi Conservation Corridor Logical Framework for Consolidation Objective Targets Means of Verification Reinforce and sustain the conservation gains achieved as a result of previous CEPF investment in the Choco-Manabi Conservation Corridor. Seven stakeholder networks strengthened to support long-term conservation action by replicating and scaling up CEPF successes. 576,962 hectares located in key biodiversity areas with strengthened protection and management. Four CEPF conservation results replicated and/or scaled up. and Annual Portfolio Overview Reports and Protected Areas Tracking Tool (SP1 METT) and Annual Portfolio Overview Reports $2,900,000 leveraged Final project reports 250,300 hectares in production landscapes with improved management for biodiversity conservation and Productive Landscape Tracking Tool (SP2 METT) Intermediate Outcomes Targets Means of Verification Outcome 1. Governance and management structures and plans adopted and implemented in three sub-corridors. $1,280,000 Three sub-corridors under improved governance for sustainable development through achievement of key conservation milestones. Nine KBAs demonstrate improvements in their protection and management 1. Cayapas - Mataje Ecological Reserve 2. Cotacachi- Cayapas National Park 3. Chachi Gran Reserve 4. Golondrinas Protected Forest 5. Awacachi sub-corridor and Annual Portfolio Overview Reports 7

Outcome 2. Conservation and human welfare considerations are incorporated into local, regional, and national development plans in key sub-corridors: the bi-national region, Munchique-Pinche, and Serranía de Los Paraguas. $470,000 Outcome 3. Stable funding mechanisms are operational in support of priority management needs in Cotacachi Cayapas and Cayapas Mataje Ecological Reserve and three key sub-corridors: the bi-national region, Munchique-Pinche, and Serranía de Los Paraguas. $200,000 6. Serrania de los Paragua sub-corridor 7. Tatama National Park 8. Munchique National Park 9. Awa indigenous territories Seven projects enable effective stewardship by indigenous and local communities for biodiversity and ecosystem conservation. Six projects located outside protected areas integrate biodiversity conservation in management practices. 100% of targeted communities involved in sustainable use projects demonstrate tangible socioeconomic benefits. Twelve policies influenced as a result of CEPF grant consolidation. Five sustainable financing mechanisms established and/or strengthened with initial capital secured. and Annual Portfolio Overview Reports 8