GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY



Similar documents
Residential & Commercial Sectors Overview CLIMATE

Chicago Regional Energy Snapshot Profile and Strategy Analysis. Prepared for the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning

Corporate Carbon Neutral Plan

PE9.4 Corrected Report

Calculating Greenhouse Gas Emissions

REPUBLIC OF TURKEY INTENDED NATIONALLY DETERMINED CONTRIBUTION

Gateway Technical College

Communicating Your Commitment: Your Guide to Clean Energy Messaging

This fact sheet provides an overview of options for managing solid

TOWN OF CARRBORO NORTH CAROLINA

Summit County Energy Plan - Goals A. Explanation and Comparison: State and Summit County Goals B. Measurement and Verification

The City of Calgary 2003 Corporate Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventory

City of Atlanta CLIMATE ACTION PLAN

EMISSIONS INVENTORY FORECASTING IN CALIFORNIA International Emissions Inventory Conference San Diego, California April 15, 2015

Levelized Cost of New Electricity Generating Technologies

Corporate & Community Climate Action Plan

Multiple sources of energy will be available, giving the consumer choices. A Higher Percentage of Energy will come from renewable energy sources

College of Saint Benedict St. Joseph, MN Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Report

Summary: Apollo Group Greenhouse Gas Inventory (Worldwide)

Solid Waste: Opportunities for Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction in Sonoma County. Community Climate Action Plan

JACKSON HOLE ENERGY EFFICIENCY ACTION PLAN FALL Page 1 of 9

How to Earn the LEED Green Power Credit

September 9, Mr. John Eichberger Executive Director Fuels Institute 1600 Duke Street, Suite 700 Alexandria, Virginia 22314

Threshold Determination: California Case Law

General/Broad Issues (G) Adopted Date

Renewable Choice Energy

Economic Outcomes of a U.S. Carbon Tax. Executive Summary

Green Fleet Policy PURPOSE

San Antonio College. Energy Systems Laboratory TEXAS ENGINEERING EXPERIMENT STATION TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM

Ozone Precursor and GHG Emissions from Light Duty Vehicles Comparing Electricity and Natural Gas as Transportation Fuels

Pittsburgh. Initiative. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory. Climate Protection

Introduction. So, What Is a Btu?

Courses Earth and Environmental Science

Understanding and Measuring School Electronics

ENVIRONMENTAL, ENERGY AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT

The Greenhouse Gas Protocol

T E A C H E R S N O T E S

Redefining Progress Sustainable Indicators Program. Reducing a City s Ecological Footprint: The Case of Santa Monica ( )

PITTSBURGH GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSONS INVENTORY A 5 -YEAR BENCHMARK

NEW ZEALAND S RESPONSE TO CLIMATE CHANGE

Emission Facts. The amount of pollution that a vehicle emits and the rate at which

Solar City Master Plan - Executive Summary

Report to the Legislative Assembly

Greenhouse Gas Inventory Valencia Community College May 7 th 2010

Prudential plc. Basis of Reporting: GHG emissions data and other environmental metrics.

Pre-lab Homework Lab 10: Global Warming Prior to lab, answer the following questions to help you become prepared for the lab.

Economic Development and the Risk of Global Climate Change

Clean Diesel versus CNG Buses: Cost, Air Quality, & Climate Impacts

ClimatE leaders GrEENHOUsE Gas inventory PrOtOCOl COrE module GUidaNCE

equivalents (CO2e) emitted by a person or business. Usually expressed in the number of CO2e tons emitted per unit of time (per year) or

City of Santa Ana Energy Savings Analysis. Prepared for Southern California Edison

HOW AN ENERGY EFFICIENT HOME CAN HELP THE ENVIRONMENT

Revision to the approved baseline methodology AM0011

This is a draft document for review by the Oregon Greenhouse Gas Reporting Advisory Committee April 1, 2010

Fixing the Leaks: What Would it Cost to Clean Up Natural Gas Leaks?

Landfill Gas In Ireland - The Facts

SEATTLE STEAM COMPANY FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Greenhouse gas abatement potential in Israel

Corporate Energy Conservation and Demand Management Plan Engineering Department. Public Works Division

How to implement renewable energy and energy efficiency options

S 0417 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

SSE s criteria used for GHG emissions reporting

Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard (REPS).

Oregon Renewable. Energy. Resources. Inside this Brief. Background Brief on. Overview of Renewable Energy. Renewable Portfolio Standard

Scope 1 describes direct greenhouse gas emissions from sources that are owned by or under the direct control of the reporting entity;

GREEN COMFORT FOR SUSTAINABLE CITIES.

Building Energy Efficiency Opportunity Report

UNEP IMF GIZ - GSI workshop. Reforming Fossil Fuel Subsidies for an Inclusive Green Economy

Climate Commitments and Planning Actions in the City of Helsinki

Carbon Footprint of CMC Hospital for 2013

Module 7 Forms of energy generation

University of South Florida Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory FY

Electric Power Monthly with Data for October 2015

Carbon Credits: An Opportunity for Forest Landowners. Hughes Simpson Texas Forest Service

Status of China s regional trading programs: progress and challenge

A Triple Bottom Line Opportunity For Our Cities

Climate Change Plan For Orange County Government

Climate Change Mitigation: a Strategic Approach for Cities

Sustainable Plastics with Reduced Carbon Footprint & Reduced Waste

Transcription:

GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY The first step in developing a plan to reduce greenhouse gases was to identify sources and quantities of greenhouse gases emitted in Fort Collins. An emissions inventory was conducted for the baseline year of. This inventory included only carbon dioxide and methane (together represented as a CO 2 equivalent, or CO 2 e). The inventory did not cover a small subset of emissions that are not readily controlled by local government actions including large engine sources (locomotive and aircraft) and agricultural sources (fertilizer and livestock). This section presents a baseline greenhouse gas emissions analysis for, an interim year emissions analyses (1995 and 1997), and a projection of greenhouse gas emissions for 24 and 21. CO 2 e = Carbon Dioxide Equivalent; Global Warming Potential To make relative comparisons between carbon dioxide and methane possible, the Global Warming Potential for both has been calculated. Since methane is 21 times more potent a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide, the relative global warming potential of carbon dioxide = 1, and methane = 21. When methane and carbon dioxide emissions are summed, they are referred to as CO 2 (e), indicating the methane has been converted to CO 2 equivalent. City-wide Baseline Emissions Inventory () The emissions inventory covers residential, commercial, industrial and transportation sector emissions of CO 2 that result from the combustion of fossil fuel. It also covers methane that is emitted from solid waste decay from Fort Collins contribution to the Larimer County Landfill. Details of the emissions inventory, including data sources and assumptions, are discussed in Fort Collins Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis in Appendix B. In, Fort Collins generated approximately 1,36, tons of CO 2 e. Figure 3 shows CO 2 emissions by source. The largest source (42%) of local CO 2 emissions is electricity generation. Approximately 6% of Fort Collins' electricity is provided by the Rawhide Energy Station (the cleanest coal-fired power plant in Colorado), and approximately 35% of the city's power is hydroelectric. A small fraction of Fort Collins electricity is from wind energy purchased by voluntary subscription. Fort Colllins Greenhouse Gas Audit 1.36 million tons CO2 Natural Gas 24% 4% Electricity 42% Transportati on 3% Figure 3. Fort Collins Greenhouse Gas Emissions, by Source 12

EMISSIONS INVENTORY Over a quarter (3%) of CO 2 emissions came from fuel burned for transportation. Another quarter came from natural gas combustion, used primarily for residential and commercial heating. Methane released from solid waste decay in the landfill was responsible for approximately 4% of the CO 2 emissions. Figure 4 shows that CO 2 emissions by major end use were relatively evenly distributed across residential, commercial, industrial, and transportation sectors, with a smaller portion resulting from landfill waste decay. Fort Collins Emissions, by End Use Total emissions = 1.36 millions tons CO2 Transportation 3% 4% Residential 23% Industrial 22% Commercial 21% Figure 4. Fort Collins Greenhouse Gas Emissions by End Use Sector In, Fort Collins population had reached 87,758. Each citizen generated an average 15.5 tons CO 2 e. Figure 5 shows Fort Collins per capita emissions relative to select Cities for Climate Protection cities. Generally, CO 2 emissions are lower in temperate climates and areas of high urban density having lower VMT per area. CO 2 emissions are higher in areas of temperature extremes where more energy is spent on heating or cooling. Tons CO2 25 2 15 1 5 8.5 Berkeley Per Capita CO2e Emissions () 12. Santa Monica 15.5 Fort Collins 18.5 Figure 5. Select U.S. Cities Per Capita Emissions 2.7 23.7 Boulder Austin Missoula 13

Interim Year Emissions Inventory (1995) A greenhouse gas emissions inventory was also conducted for 1995. In 1995, Fort Collins total CO 2 emissions were 1,621, tons, a 19% increase over levels. Per capita CO 2 emissions increased by 5% from 15.5 tons per person in to 16.3 tons per person in 95. Interim Year Emissions Inventory (1997) A greenhouse gas emissions inventory was also conducted for 1997. In 1997, Fort Collins total CO 2 emissions were 1,861, tons, a 37% increase over levels. Per capita CO 2 emissions increased from 15.5 tons per person in to 17.5 tons per person in 1997. Figures 6 and 7 show how Fort Collins CO 2 emissions increased by source and end-use sector between and 1997. Emissions Growth -1997, by Source 9 8 7 36% Incr 63% incr 1 tons CO2 6 5 4 3 17% Incr 1995 1997 2 1 27% Decr Electricity Transportation Natural Gas Figure 6. 1997 Increase in Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Source Emissions Growth -1997; by End Use 7 63% Incr 6 1 Tons CO2 5 4 3 2 3% Incr 29% Incr 28% Incr 1995 1997 1 27% Decr Residential Commercial Industrial Transportation Landfill Figure 7. 1997 Increase in Greenhouse Gas Emissions by End Use Sector 14

EMISSIONS INVENTORY City-wide Greenhouse Gas Emissions Forecast (21) The CO 2 e emissions forecast for 21 is intended to reflect CO 2 emissions in the absence of any conservation Fort Collins 21 Greenhouse Gas Sources measures (3.523 m illion tons CO 2) implemented since. Under this Solid W aste 3% scenario, Fort Natural Gas Electricity Collins CO 2 13% 33% emissions are predicted to increase to 3.523 million Transportati tons, an increase more than on 51% one and a half times (159%) the level. Figure 8. Forecast 21 Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Source Fort Collins population is predicted to increase to 143,45 by 21, based on a predicted 2.2% yearly growth rate from 1999 through 21. This yields a per capita emission rate of 24.6 tons CO 2 e in 21. The net emissions increase between and 21 is 159%, with a per capita increase of 58%. The growth assumptions used to create this forecast and resulting emissions growth rates are outlined in Table 2. Propane, which accounts for less than 1% of the inventory, was excluded from the table. The assumptions are discussed in greater detail in Appendix B, Fort Collins Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis. Table 2. Fort Collins 21 Emissions Forecast Assumptions Emissions Category Tons CO 2 Avg. Yrly Growth Tons CO 2 Net growth -21 Tons CO 2 21 Tons CO 2 Data Source Electricity 565,668 3.6 % 13 % 1,146,257 Fort Collins Utilities Natural Gas 239,737 1.8 % 44 % 475,15 Public Service Company of Colorado Transportation (based on 7% VMT growth/yr from 95-21. ( per capita waste = 1.66 tons, and 2.2% population growth/yr from 1999 to 21) 44,752 7.8 % 346 % 1,83,86 57,38 2.5 % 63 % 93,675 City of Fort Collins Transportation Department Population growth rate City of Fort Collins Advance Planning Department 15

City-wide Greenhouse Gas Emissions Forecast (24) The same forecast assumptions are used to create a nearer-tem forecast for the year 24. Fort Collins is predicted to emit 2.536 million tons of CO2 in 24, or an estimated 23.9 tons per person. Figure 9 shows predicted emissions by source categories for 24. Fort Collins 24 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Forecast Natural Gas 17% 2% Electricity 38% Transport 43% Figure 9. Forecast 24 Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Source Fort Collins Greenhouse Gas Emissions Growth 1 tons CO2e 2 18 16 14 12 1 8 6 = 1.36 million tons CO2 1995 = 1.21 million tons CO2 1997 = 1.86 million tons CO2 24 = 2.54 million tons CO2 21 = 3.52 million tons CO2 85% Incr 86% Incr 72% Incr 346% Incr 1995 1997 24 21 4 2 63% Incr Residential Commercial Industrial Transportation Landfill Figure 1. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Increase from - 21 Figure 1 illustrates the growth in CO 2 emissions by end use sector between and 21. Based on the above assumptions, Fort Collins CO 2 emissions are predicted to increase 159 % by 21. This increase is higher than most other U.S. cities participating in the CCP campaign, and is attributed to the expected continuation of rapid growth rates experienced in the recent past. The largest jump by far is predicted for the transportation sector, which is forecast to increase nearly 35% above levels. This prediction is based on results of the 1998 Mobility Report Card for Fort Collins, which indicated that vehicle miles traveled (VMT) rose 25% between 1995 and 1998. 16

EMISSIONS INVENTORY The 21 electricity and natural gas usage forecasts were based on estimates provide by the Fort Collins Utilities and Public Service Company of Colorado. Although residential electrical appliances are becoming more energy efficient, the square footage of new homes is increasing, as is the number of appliances per household, accounting for the predicted 3% per year increase in electricity consumption in the residential sector. Additionally, residential air conditioning has been identified as one of the most rapidly growing energy demands. The 21 emissions from the landfill have been estimated by applying the per capita municipal solid waste generation rate (1.6 tons of waste to landfills per person) to the projected 21 population of 143,45 people. The 21 population estimate was based on a growth rate of 2.2% per year from 1999 until 21. The City s Advance Planning Department estimates the Fort Collins population to reach 112,912 in 1999. City Government Emissions Inventory City Council Resolution 97-97, which authorizes work on this campaign, expresses the intent for the City government to set a good example: The Council intends for the City to take a leadership role in increasing energy efficiency and reducing greenhouse gas emissions from municipal operations. In order to gain an understanding of greenhouse gas emissions resulting from municipal operations, a emissions inventory for the City government was prepared. Because the city government does not track all the information needed to prepare the audit, a number of assumptions were made to arrive at a CO 2 emissions estimate for. These are discussed in greater detail in Appendix B. City Government Baseline Greenhouse Gas Emissions The emissions inventory for Fort Collins City government covers buildings, streetlights, water treatment processes, fleet fuel consumption, and waste generation. In, City government operations were responsible for the consumption of 212,337 million BTU s, disposal of 1,942 tons of waste, and 39,736 tons CO 2 e. This represents 2.9% of Fort Collins total citywide CO 2 emissions. Water/Sewage 36% City Government CO2 Emisisons 39,736 Tons CO2(e) Waste 2% Streetlights 22% Figure 11. City Government CO 2 Emissions Buildings 32% Vehicle Fleet 8% 17

Figure 11 and Table 3 list City operations share of CO 2 emissions. Table 3. Fort Collins City Government CO 2 Emissions Tons CO2 (e) Percent CO2(e) Energy Million BTU s Buildings 12,577 31.7 % 86,852 Vehicle Fleet 3,167 8 % 39,88 Streetlights 8,545 21.5 % 25,584 Water Treatment and Reclamation 14,743 37.1 % 6,21 Waste 73 1.8 % TOTAL 39,736 1 % 212,337 18