Contemporary understanding of Gregorian chant conceptualisation and practice

Contemporary understanding of Gregorian chant conceptualisation and practice Volume two of three: Appendices I Eerik Joks Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of York Department of Music November 9

84 List of contents Appendix Interview with Michiko Hirayama in Rome, on 8. 9..6. 89 Appendix Interview with Professor Godehard Joppich in Frankfurt, on..5. 95 Appendix Figure (additional). Different possibilities of reception of MSLM. 45 Appendix 4 Intervjuu Arvo ja Nora Pärdiga 5. aasta suvel. 46 Appendix 5 Interview with Professor Godehard Joppich in Frankfurt, on..8. 45 Appendix 6 Questionnaire for Performers and Experts of Gregorian chant in English. 4 Appendix 7 Questionnaire for Performers and Experts of Gregorian chant in Estonian. 4 Appendix 8 The printed version of the Questionnaire for Performers and Experts of Gregorian chant in English (A5) (in the pocket on the back cover). 445 Appendix 9 Tables 9 (TAO). Raw data of the results of questionnaire in the form of frequency tables. 446 Appendix Correspondence to respondents concerning the Questionnaire. 489 Appendix Table 5 (additional). Number of responses, mean values, and variance of the answers to the questions 7 Gregorian chant for me means [an argument] ; sorted by mean; AMP=4.. 494 Appendix Table 6 (additional). Number of responses, mean values, and variance of the answers to the questions 7 Gregorian chant for me is [an argument] ; sorted by variance; AMP=.4. 495 Appendix Table 7 (additional). Number of responses, mean values, variance, ratio of mean and variance, subtraction of mean and variance, position of the arguments in the table of the answers to the questions 7 Gregorian chant for me means [an argument] ; sorted by the subtraction of mean and variance ( M V ). 496 Appendix 4 Table 8 (additional). Number of responses, mean values and variance of the answers to the questions 4 7 How important is [an argument] for a good performance of Gregorian chant? ; sorted by mean; AMP=4.7. 497 Appendix 5 Table 9 (additional). Number of responses, mean values and variance of the answers to the questions 4 7 How important is [an argument] for a good performance of Gregorian chant? ; sorted by variance; AMP=.. 498 Appendix 6 Table (additional). Number of responses, mean values, variance, ratio of mean and variance, subtraction of mean and variance, position of results of the answers to the questions 4 7 How important is [an argument] for a good performance of Gregorian chant? ; sorted by subtraction of mean and variance. 499 Appendix 7 Table (additional). Number of responses, mean values, and variance of the answers to the questions 85 9 How would you characterize the relationship between music and text in Gregorian chant? ; sorted by mean; AMP=.9. 5

85 Appendix 8 Appendix 9 Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix 4 Appendix 5 Appendix 6 Appendix 8 Appendix 9 Appendix Table (additional). Number of responses, mean values and variance of the answers to the questions 85 9 How would you characterize the relationship between music and text in Gregorian chant? ; sorted by variance. 5 Table (additional). Number of responses, mean values, and variance of the answers to the questions 85 9 How would you characterize the relationship between music and text in Gregorian chant? ; sorted by the subtraction of mean and variance. 5 Figure 4 (additional). Evaluations of the respondents on possibilities of restoration of historically authentic performance practice of medieval Gregorian chant. The chart is drawn on the bases of Table 6. 5 Table 4 (additional). Mean and number of positive correlations ( Corr ) that are significant on the level. between the variables in the set of questions 7; sorted by Corr. 54 Table 4 (additional). Number of positive correlations that are significant on the level. between the variables in the set of questions 7; A = correlations of all respondents (as in the previous table), column B = correlations of these 85 respondents who consider religion more important for themselves; sorted by column B. 55 Table 4 (additional). Rotated component matrix of questions 7 (two components). N = variables with a values close to zero or negative. 56 Table 44 (additional). Rotated component matrix of questions 7 (three components); N = values close to zero or negative; N = variables with a positive value only in one component; N = variables with positive value in all components. 57 Table 45 (additional). Rotated component matrix of questions 7 (four components); N = values close to zero or negative; N = variables with positive value in all components. 58 Table 46 (additional). Mean and number of positive correlations ( Corr ) that are significant on the level. between the variables in the set of questions 4 7; sorted by Corr. 59 Table 47 (additional). Number of positive correlations that are significant on the level. between the variables in the set of questions 4 7; A = correlations of all respondents (as in the previous table), column B = correlations of these 85 respondents who consider religion more important for themselves; sorted by column B. 5 Table 48 (additional). Rotated component matrix of questions 4 7 (two components); N = variables with a values close to zero or negative. 5

86 Appendix Table 49 (additional). Rotated component matrix of questions 4 7 (three components); N = variables with a values close to zero or negative; N = variables with a positive value only in one component; N = variables with positive value in all components. 5 Appendix Table 5 (additional). Rotated component matrix of questions 4 7 (four components); N = variables with a values close to zero or negative; N = variables with positive value in all components. 5 Appendix Table 4 (TOA). A table of the key figures of Gregorian chant through all times as assessed by the respondents of the questionnaire. 54 Appendix 4 Table 5 (TOA). A table of the key figures of Gregorian chant from the beginning of the nineteenth century, as assessed by the respondents of the questionnaire. 58 Appendix 7 Table 6 (additional). Amount of influencing comparison variables in the set of questions 7. 5 Appendix 8 Table 6 (additional). Amount of variables in the set of questions 7 that are influenced by a particular comparison question. 5 Appendix 9 Table 6 (additional). Comparison of means of questions sacred text, illuminated by music (Q5); meaningful texts (Q); a form of teaching about the Word of God with Other than at church services, how often do you pray? (q47.). 54 Appendix 4 Table 6 (additional). Amount of influencing comparison arguments in the set of questions 4 7. 55 Appendix 4 Table 64 (additional). Amount of variables in the set of questions 4 7 that are influenced by a particular comparison question. 56 Appendix 4 Table 65 (additional). Comparison of means of the comparison questions with the partition of selected nationalities (Q5). 57 Appendix 44 Guidelines for the Recording in English 58 Appendix 45 Guidelines for the Recording in Estonian 5 Appendix 46 Figure 8 (additional). Transcription of the Gradual Haec dies; numeration of notes is added by the transcriber. 5 Appendix 47 Histograms of different segments of 5 solo performances of the Gradual Haec dies: notes 8; notes 5; notes 8; notes 5; notes 99 5. 5 Appendix 48 Table 6 (TAO). Lengths of the notes of the Gradual Haec dies in performance of 5 solo performers 569 Appendix 49 Table 68 (additional). Length of the piece with breaths (Length, br), groups according to previous column (Group), length of the piece without breaths (Length, no br), mean note value, and derived mean note value; sorted by length of the piece with breaths. All values, except Group are in milliseconds. 58

87 Appendix 5 Table 69 (additional). Groups formed according to DNC (Group), number of different note categories (DNC), standard deviation (StDev), length of the piece without breaths (Length, no br), mean note value, and derived mean note value; sorted by DNC. 584 Appendix 5 Histograms 5 solo performances of the Gradual Haec dies in partitions of: all notes included; bins with less than three notes excluded; bins with less than five notes excluded. 585 Appendix 5 Table 7 (additional). Number of BNVs, StDev, and L+/L ; sorted by BNV. 656 Appendix 5 Table 7. Groups of notes of equal duration as perceived by performers; notes 8; sorted by Gr (groups formed on similarity); all values are in milliseconds; sorted by groups that are formed according to similarity. 657 Appendix 54 Table 7 (additional). Performers who perceive notes and as of equal duration; ratio of and and deviation of from ; sorted by the ratio of and ; divided into three segments by different colours: () the second note is longer, () the first and the second notes are equal, () the first note is longer. 658 Appendix 55 Figure 5 (additional). Transcription of a fragment of the verse Confitemini Domino of the Gradual Haec dies from selected medieval and contemporary sources. 659 Appendix 56 Table 76 (additional). BNV and values describing the ratio of the first and the second musical sentences; sorted and grouped by F. 66 Appendix 57 Table 77 (additional). BNV and values describing the ratio of the first and the second musical sentences with number of notes 5/85 for all performers who treat SNOP as one long note; sorted and grouped by F. 66 Appendix 58 Table 78 (additional). BNV and values describing the ratio of the first and the second musical sentences with number of notes 5/85 for all performers who treat SNOP as one long note; all negative values in F are transformed into absolute values; sorted and grouped by F. 66 Appendix 59 Table 79 (additional). BNV, DNC, mean note value in the first musical sentence ( Mean ), mean note value in the second musical sentence ( Mean ), difference between means ( Dif ) and values describing the ratio of the first and the second musical sentences; all negative values in DIF and F are transformed into absolute values; sorted and grouped by F. 66 Appendix 6 Table 8 (additional). Number of DNC, BNV, differences in musical sentences that separates from ideal balance of two musical sentences; sorted by Difference in the first musical sentence, that separates from the ideal balance of two sentences ; all negative values are transformed into absolute values and marked as blue text. 664 Appendix 6 Table 8 (additional). Correlations between the length of the piece and the questions 7, 4 7, 85 9, 7 9, and 46 which are significant at least at the.5 level. 665

88 Appendix 6 Table 8 (additional). Comparison of the results of the correlation analysis and the ANOVA test (length of the piece). 666 Appendix 6 Table 8 (additional). Comparison of means according to the length of the piece. 667 Appendix 64 Table 85 (additional). Correlation analysis of StDev of all notes ( StDev all notes ), StDev of notes without bins, which contain less than three notes ( StDev > ), StDev of notes without bins, which contain less than five notes ( StDev >5 ); PC = Pearson Correlation, Sig = Significance index; in the order of the questions in the questionnaire. 668 Appendix 65 Table 87 (additional). Correlation analysis of the DNC of all notes ( DNC all notes ), notes without bins, which contain less than three notes ( DNC > ), notes without bins, which contain less than five notes ( DNC >5 ); in the order of the questions in the questionnaire. 669 Appendix 66 Table 88 (additional). DNC in all partitions and groups formed on the base of DNC> ; sorted by DNC>. 67 Appendix 67 Table 9 (additional). Comparison of means according to the groups formed on the base of DNC (>). 67 Appendix 68 The script of a family tree of Gregorian chant performers (Appendix 5, vol, pp 684 685). 67

TP TP PT Michiko PT The 89 Appendix This appendix has double page numbers: () on the top of the page, there is a general page number of this volume; () on the bottom of the page, there is page number of this particular interview transcript. The latter consists of two numbers. The first represents a current page number and the second the overall number of pages of this interview transcript. Interview with Michiko Hirayama in Rome, on 8 9 March 6TP PT Introduction When I met Godehard Joppich in Frankfurt on. March 5, he told me about a Japanese singer Michiko Hirayama, who is living in Rome and who was a student of Eugène Cardine. Godehard also told me that Michiko had recorded her lessons with Eugène Cardine.TP PT I went to Rome to listen the recordings and Michiko kindly agreed to give me an interview about her experience of Gregorian chant and her long years working with Eugène Cardine. As always, some very important things are said before the actual interview begins. I was very lucky that I had my recording device switched on when we were having tea with honey before we got to the interview. As usual, it turned into much more than a formal interview: it became a story from history, told by someone who had participated in the process. We talked and sang for over two days for more than four hours each day. It is not possible in the time frame of this research to transcribe all the text. Therefore, only some extracts are transcribed. It might be useful in future to transcribe the whole text and use it in a more comprehensive work about the history of contemporary Latin chant performance. Whenever there are three full stops in the square brackets, it means that some text is omitted because it was not relevant for this research. Texts in square brackets are added to explain what happened in the room the sounds and gestures. We were talking Hirayama approved this interview transcript on 7..9. archive of Michiko Hirayama turned out to be quite a surprise. It comprised of hundreds of tapes and cassettes of recording of rehearsals, lessons, concerts, lectures, and divine services. I made two visits to Rome to pre catalogue this part of the archive that was connected to Gregorian chant. Michiko Hirayama gave the original material to Godehard Joppich in 8. There can still be some Gregorian chant related material in the archive in Rome, as it is not well organized and it was not possible for me to listen through all the tapes in the archive. Page /6

9 in English and as this is not Michiko s first language I had to edit the sentences at some points. To be sure that I wrote down what she really meant I sent the written text to her for approval. Michiko s text is in regular style and my text is in italics. Footnotes are my additions. [ ] When I listened to the recordings in your archive it was very exiting to hear tapes on which Eugène Cardine was teaching. I always thought of him as a serious man but it seems I was wrong. He is laughing and making jokes all the time. You are right he was a very serious man. He was just always very gay and full of humor. [ ] What he taught me as a singer was [Michiko sings the beginning of the Introit Laetatur cor in a very floating manner]. The way that he treated the sound was as if something was floating in the air. This was the biggest lesson I ever got in my whole process of studying singing. For a long time I considered Gregorian chant to be something that should be declaimed. As if you were singing in a huge cathedral and you must sing so that it reaches to every person in the cathedral. All monks who have a beautiful voice to present make such a mistake. [Michiko gives an example on the recording how chant should not be sung. She plays a version of the introit Ad te levavi that is very well sung and presented boldly and with passion. After that Michiko sings Ad te levavi in very floating and contemplative manner.] Something different huh? [Eerik sings the beginning of Ad te levavi how way he sung it three years ago in a very declamatory and quite aggressive manner. Then he sings the whole piece in a quite Page /6

TP TP PT Cardine s PT Students PT Italian 9 different manner floating and contemplative. During the latter Michiko joins in at several phrases.] This is Gregorian chant. [ ] HisTP 4 was funny, but he made himself clear. Most studentstp PT were against Cardine because they could not follow his natural musicality. Godehard Joppich told the same thing that students found it hard to follow Cardine and that was how he started the edition of Gregorian semiology. Cardine was fortunate to have Joppich and Fisher who did the book Gregorian semiology for him. If they take something to do they do it properly and they worked very hard. Italians never work that way and the French all refused Cardine, because Solesmes did not like Cardine. Solesmes knew that Cardine was the best and they did not want to admit that he is a kind of genius among the monks who all wanted to be top. Cardine never wanted to be top he just wanted to be a singer. Everybody knew that he was the best. They did not want to have Cardine in Abbey of Solesmes. Did Cardine talk about it? He told me about many delicate problems in the monastery. Are they still delicate? Very delicate!! All human history depends on the struggle around who wants to be the top. [ ] 4 of the Pontifical Institute Page /6

TP PT It 9 Extracts from the interview Please tell me the story of you and Gregorian chant. How did you end up in Rome, studying with Cardine? I came to Europe in 95 to find a way of natural singing. I went to the mosque to listen to Arabic chant. I also planned to go to Israel but it was difficult at this time. I stayed in Rome and I met many Benedictine monks. They wanted to learn the tea ceremony and I was able to teach it to them. I asked them where could I study Gregorian chant. Is there a good chant teacher here in Rome? They said immediately Dom Cardine. One morning I 5 went and knocked on the door of the Pontifical Institute of Sacred Music.TP PT The lesson had already begun. I asked May I follow your lesson Dom Cardine? I explained that I was a singer and told who directed me there. Dom Cardine said: Yes, I know about you. I heard about you. Sit down and listen. During the lesson he spoke very little mostly he was singing. As a singer, I noticed the natural way of using his body. This kind of singing makes a real natural melody. From my point of view, it is completely different from his students in Gregorian chant. They looked at neumes and said: this is how it should be sung. I do not know theory that well but the way Cardine did singing [Michiko demonstrates Cardine s body movement during singing, which includes slight movement of feet. The upper body was slightly bouncing from hips.] that was something. Gregorian chant scholars never noticed what I noticed. In Solesmes they also use a sort of floating sound, which is very well heard when the melody goes up. [Eerik demonstrates by singing three ascending notes and making decrescendo when going on the third note.] Is that something different? Cardine was more natural and comfortable according to the nature of our body. He did not think about neumes; rather all neumes were in his body all neumes were living in his body. [ ] 5 was about 96 Page 4/6

9 If you think about neumes while you are singing, there is no more singing. Do you know what I mean? You must not think about neumes you must have them in your body. [ ] Is that the idea of going beyond the sign what Cardine wrote in his musicological testament. We talked so much about it. Every Sunday after the Mass we had one hour for talking. We talked much about singing and how it must be beyond any sign, any fixed idea, beyond the technique. It should come out like vapor. We talked so much about it. [ ] What did learning singing with Cardine mean for you in performing other repertoires? It meant accepting all the capacity of our body that is given by nature. Each one of us who can speak can also sing. Use only what is given by nature, use it fully and then comes singing. So do you think that this singing can be used in other repertoires? It is the same! [ ] What does the pair of words Gregorian chant mean to you? It means songs that are born from out of human nature. What makes men sing? To have something that you cannot get in other words to pray. You don t reach to your lover you pray; there is no rain you pray; there is too much rain you pray. It is a normal thing to ask for something to be better and words come out in singing. Conversation what does it mean? Asking for something is a basic reason for men to sing. Oh my God! [Michiko says it in a rather expressive way and rather loudly]. This already is singing. [ ] Page 5/6

94 I am not in love with Gregorian chant I leave that for Catholic monks. For me chant is singing natural singing. Why shouldn t I get basic singing principles from learning Gregorian chant? [ ] There was a beautiful thing that Cardine told me. After the Mass, he remained alone to sit and pray at his place for at least 5 minutes. He knew that I was coming but he always sat and prayed at least 5 minutes. One day I asked a very un polite question: why do you always stay at your place after the Mass and pray? What are you praying for? And he said: We have been given such a beautiful and great gift in Gregorian chant. There is only very little we can give back. I am asking for forgiveness of the Father that I am not able to give back enough. [ ] When Cardine was in hospital before his death I went to see him and I said Let us pray that Gregorian chant will remain as Father originally gave it to us. He squeezed my hand and said Pray to the Madonna, pray to the Madonna. [ ] He knew that it [Michiko knocks on the Graduale Triplex] remains only a book. Without a singing genius it will die. I hope that some day a new genius will come who will understand its value. [ ] Page 6/6

TP PT Godehard 95 Appendix This appendix has double page numbers: () on the top of the page, there is a general page number of this volume; () on the bottom of the page, there is page number of this particular interview transcript. The latter consists of two numbers. The first represents a current page number and the second the overall number of pages of this interview transcript. Interview with Professor Godehard Joppich in Frankfurt, on March 5 Introduction It is highly appreciated that Godehard Joppich agreed to give this interview in English although it is neither his first nor second language. As English appeared to be the only language we had in common we had to use it for the interview. Anyway, all that Godehard communicated was clear and understandable for me but in many cases, I had to change the order of words and in some cases build completely new sentences. In the first stage of transcribing, I started to add comments in square brackets, to clarify the meaning of the text to readers. Finally, I gave up, because it was clear that I would have to edit the entire text. I kept adding comments in brackets where Godehard sang or read a text or made a sound that is not possible to transcribe. Because of all this substantial 6 editing, I sent the written text to Professor Joppich for his approval.tp PT I footnotes. Godehard s text is in regular style and my questions are in italics. added all the In many places, I am not able to describe with words what happened in the room several times Godehard started singing spontaneously to illustrate his words. It is also not possible to describe how he recited by heart the beginning of the Gospel of St John in Latin. My good plans to ask all prepared questions did not succeed there was no need to ask. Godehard kept talking and all he said was more interesting and actually contributed more to the research than the questions that I had prepared. At some point, the interview became a spontaneous conversation between teacher and pupil. Before the interview, we had a conversation about the restitution of melodies during the restoration of Gregorian chant and especially about the launching of the Papal Commission, formed in 9 to publish the Vatican Edition of liturgical books. In a few 6 Joppich approved this interview transcript on 8.4.9. Page /

TP TP PT Pothier PT Pius 96 sentences, Godehard resuméd the rivalry between André Mocquereau from the Abbey of St Pierre in Solesmes and the leader of the Commission Joseph Pothier. It was so neatly described that I had to transcribe it here as well. Godehard Joppich: The Vatican Edition that we have now is with minor changes the edition from 88 the first edition of the Solesmes Liber Gradualis that was compiled 7 by Joseph Pothier. He was no longer in SolesmesTP PT, when 8 the PopeTP PT encouraged him to conduct the work of compiling the Vatican Edition. Pothier had no scholarly resources, so he used the same edition that he had made in 88 at Solesmes. Meanwhile the restoration of melodies in Solesmes advanced. But the Pope said: No, Pothier is the editor. Mocquereau and Solesmes were very offended and Pothier did the Vatican Edition. It remained as it was in 88 nothing else. Pothier had great support from German musicologist Peter Wagner over the question of the traditio legitima against the traditio authentica. Traditio authentica was a principle of Mocquereau. He said that the melodies have to be restored according to the earliest manuscripts. Pothier argued that we must respect hundreds of years of development. People have changed it, because they sang it in another way, and they had a right to change it it is a development. Mocquereau said that art could not develop. If a painter paints a picture, it is impossible that another painter comes and develops it by over painting it. However, it was not possible to convince Wagner and others who were with Pothier. They insisted that the traditio legitima should be respected. Legitima means in this context that the changes made during the centuries are legitimate. The interview Would you please tell a little about yourself and how did your relationship with Gregorian chant start? It started when I was years old. It was after the war the year was 946. I entered the school at the Münsterschwarzach Abbey and heard Gregorian chant there. I studied there until the end of gymnasium. After the gymnasium, I entered the monastery in 95. I became a monk and 956 I was sent to Rome to study theology. I finished 96 as a Doctor of Theology. 7 8 became the Abbot of the Abbey St. Wandrille in 898. X Page /

97 In 957, I met Eugène Cardine and I studied with him privately all these years. I had to return to my monastery in Münsterschwarzach for two years in 96. After two years, I was called back to Rome to work in the College of St Anselmo. I worked there for three years and during this time together with Rupert Fisher, we started the edition of Gregorian Semiology. It was first published it Italian in 968. Only recently, there was a translation into German. We, Rupert Fisher and I, are German, but there was no edition in our language until last year! I was in Rome and I studied privately with Cardine for at least years. I returned to Germany because I did not want to become a successor of Cardine. The president of the Musica Sacra asked me to take Cardine s place when Cardine became 7 years old and retired. I did not want to take the place because I thought that I could do more for Gregorian chant in Germany than in the Pontifical Institute of Sacred Music in Rome. Then I was asked to teach Gregorian chant in Hochschule für Musik in Munich. I worked there 97 98. Then I was called to Essen where I taught in Folkwang Hochschule until 99. When I became 6, I finished teaching in the high school of Essen. I was not any more able to teach Gregorian chant because there is actually nothing you can teach. Before you want to sing Gregorian chant or you want to know about Gregorian chant, you must know something about fides chrisitiana and perhaps you should even not only know something about this faith, but also you should credere, you should believe. Otherwise do another music, do not sing Gregorian chant if you do not believe what Christian faith says. I was so convinced about this principle that I could not teach it and I could not examine students in Gregorian chant. You cannot do exams in Gregorian chant it is a way of life. I should have done this job until I was 65, but I could not. Then I had time to study and continue the semiological work of Eugène Cardine. I believe that Cardine s research about manuscripts was a kind of study of alphabet. We learn the letters of a new language. The neumes are the letters of this new language, the Gregorian language. Letters are not words and words are not phrases. Language is more than a letter or one word. You must have semiology because you must have letters. If you know only a and b and c and d, you have no idea what is a word. If you just add some neumes to a word, you have no idea what is the phrase and what this phrase says. One word alone can be very nice but you need more than one word. I believe that with Page /

TP PT The P century P century? 98 paleography you keep reading single words. You are so preoccupied to sing it in the right rhythm but what does right rhythm mean in language? The first question in the language is not the rhythm. We should ask What was the origin of Gregorian chant? Is it possible that one musician came to a monastery of Frankish monks in the 8P th and said: You have so bad a manner of pronouncing your words. Give me all your texts and I will compose a very nice melody and then you can sing. We must ask, can the origin of Gregorian chant be estetica musicale a cultivated manner of music of the 8P th Monks knew all the texts by heart by rumination. We know that monks knew all the 5 psalms and the New Testament by heart. They did not know it through reading they had no books. They learned it because elder monk pronounced it to them and said: [Godehard is reciting by heart the beginning of the Gospel of St John in Latin] In principio erat Verbum, et Verbum erat apud Deum, et Deus erat Verbum. Hoc erat in principio apud Deum. Omnia per ipsum facta sunt, et sine ipso factum est nihil, quod factum est; in ipso vita erat, et vita erat lux hominum, et lux in tenebris lucet, et tenebrae 9 eam non comprehenderunt.tp PT For hundreds of years, monks learned all the texts this way only. The elder monk pronounced it to them and he did not pronounce only the words he pronounced his faith and not the faith from the point of view of his subjective understanding. He pronounced what he had heard from another elderly monk, who had heard it from another. Nobody dared to change even a little nuance in it because if you change the sound you also change the sense. Today we cannot print a book with holy texts without having a thorough editing and proofreading. There cannot be allowed any error in the printed text and you most certainly cannot change the text. In the same way, mistakes in sound in early times were not allowed and nor were changes. It was not possible that a composer came and said I have written you [Godehard sings the intonation of the introit of the First Sunday of Advent Ad te levavi]. This sound had already existed for hundreds of years. It existed in the sound of the words. For me, Gregorian chant is 9 text is taken from HThttp://www.vatican.va/archive/bible/nova_vulgata/THdocuments/nova vulgata_nt_ evang ioannem_lt.html. Page 4/

99 nothing more than putting this sound that exists in the words at a convenient height of the voice. Monks could do it together they found a way of a convenient melody that corresponded to the words they learned. When I pronounced to you the beginning of St John s Gospel, I said it this way for your recording, but when the elder monk pronounced it to his novices, he said more. [Godehard recites again the first verses of Gospel of St John, but this time much louder and with certain educational intention.] If you believe that you have the Evangelium a New Covenant you will pronounce in a latter way. For us it is no Evangelium any more. All these words have no sound for us because we have too little faith to give sound enough. You need more faith to pronounce the words in the way that they should be pronounced. Gregorian chant is for me the convenient height of pronouncing the words that change your life, not just only give you some information. I had a chance to continue research and study manuscripts. One of the most important manuscripts is the Manuscript of Hartker Gregorian chant for the Office. Hartker was a monk of St Gallen and he wrote the manuscript around 98. Here you must start to study because only here you understand what Gregorian chant is. Gregorian chant of the Mass is an evolution. We will never understand Gregorian chant if we believe that we perform or hear music. It is not music it is words full of sense, which we do not know like them, because they learned these texts and they lived with these texts. When you delicately press down several keys on the piano and then hit a single key, you will hear many overtones, although you only pressed one key. When they said one word, they heard this word in all its contexts. That is how so complex system of settings of liturgical texts was allowed to emerge. There are wonderful combinations of the Psalms and the New Testament in the proper of Mass. We do not have this kind of thinking. We look at one word and think what does it mean? What can we understand in this way? When we think of neumes, we think in terms of short and long. We have to ask: why short, why long. The reason is in the word itself the neumes reflect the way, how they pronounced words. First, one must understand the value of the word, then it is possible to understand the selection of particular neumes for particular words. Are the neumes for this word important or are they just there to lead you to the next word that is more important? If we look at what the neumes say, we are able to understand the sense Page 5/

4 of a phrase. The first task is not to sing, but to analyse to understand the weight of the words. Analyse without singing that is what I do daily. I take a text and I read it according to the importance of the words. It is enough for me. I do not want to go and look up the melody. First, you must learn to read neumes not to sing. This way you will understand the words and the phrase and then you can start singing. With the help of the neumes, you must come to the sense of the text not the music. For me it is enough to understand with the help of the neumes how they understood a phrase. This is another reason why I could not teach any more: I cannot think about Gregorian chant in terms of singing. You can sing Bach and Monteverdi, because there is music to sing. Here you have no music you have text to be pronounced in the way prescribed by the neumes, and nothing else. You knew Eugène Cardine and you were his student. What was he like? For me it is quite impossible to answer this question. I have no vocabulary to speak about it in English. He was really an extraordinary man. For example, during all these years I never saw him in the bad mood. He was always the same open and positive. In Rome, in St Girolamo where he lived, he started work at 4. in the morning and worked at least until in the evening, without any repose after lunch. In his musicological will, Cardine refers to André Mocquereau as somebody whose work he admires. Who else were his teachers and examples? Cardine told me that he could not believe what Mocquereau has written in his research about the Method of Solesmes. He could not believe it was right. However, Cardine loved Solesmes and all people in Solesmes. He loved also Mocquereau although he was convinced that his ideas were dreams. You cannot verify this theory in manuscripts it is impossible. His tolerance towards Mocquereau s research was fraternal solidarity. Cardine was not the first to discover episemas and other aspects of notation there were many other monks before him, who did all the comparative tables. The most important aspect about Cardine s scholarly work was his discovery of the neumatic break. His important role was to show how singing according to the Solesmes Method was not right. Mocquereau s system was to divide twenty or fifty notes into groups of two and Page 6/

TP PT Source 4 three but Cardine says no, according to, for example, source three,tp PT you can not get to the next group, you can not get to the next ictus. The neume groups are like atoms, but there are molecules in these atoms. The way they wrote the neumes is the way they sang the single groups. You have to consider the movement of the graphic group, not the single notes. There are many little movements in the neumatic notation, and this was the discovery of Cardine. Cardine was very strict in his judgement upon those who evidently ignored the fact of the manuscripts. He was very strict in these cases but he never criticised publicly his fellow monks of Solesmes. Never! But he must have had some examples or teachers whom he followed or quoted? His only teachers were the manuscripts, nothing else. Nothing else! How did he teach singing? Each second Sunday he came to exercise with the schola and we sang Mass together. For so many years, we did it every second Sunday. When he supervised the schola, he did not start with explaining. He said: Let us start singing. We sang it once then again and he corrected where necessary. He sang as well. [Godehard plays a recording, on which Cardine is conducting the schola.] How did he get to the perfection that we just heard? This schola consisted only of monks. We had sung this repertory for many years and we knew the melodies very well. There was nothing to teach in terms of melodies. We just sang and he corrected where necessary corresponding to the neumes. Was he happy with the melodies in the Vatican Edition? It was impossible to change melodies this time. You could not even think about it. He told us when it was clear that there is a mistake, for example at the beginning of Ad te levavi. [Godehard sings the melody in the Vatican Edition]. He said it is impossible to have it like this. He said it should be [Godehard sings the melody that corresponds to the neumes in the earliest manuscripts]. Nevertheless, we sang what was printed, because in 95s in three in this context means manuscript number three in a comparative table. Page 7/

4 Rome to change melodies it was completely impossible! I must say that now I suffer more because of wrong phrasing than a wrong note. Wrong sense of a phrase damages Gregorian chant much more than a note on a wrong pitch. Some scholas make a long breathing, a long pause, where you should continue. For example, Ad te levavi on the word meam the last two neume elements are torculus and clivis with episema. It is not a cadence to finish the phrase it is a crescendo to go to the next word. [Godehard illustrates his example with singing]. It is like this through the whole repertory. [Godehard presents his research where similar cases are written into a comparative table and gives examples.] But of course you must know Latin to understand neumes in this way. Did Cardine have many students? He had many students in the Pontifical Institute. I knew that most of the students at the institute were not there because of Gregorian chant. It was very prestigious to have a diploma of this institute. From fifty students you did not have one who was interested in Gregorian chant. During the study course, they had to do organ playing and choir conducting. They also had to do Gregorian chant. Most of them said: Oh, this Cardine with his neumes! I do not understand anything! That was the reason why I started to write down notes. I had reservations to show it to Cardine. Once one of the students had my notes in the class and Cardine asked: What do you have here? Who has written it? When they said that it was I, he came to me and said: You should write all the lessons all Gregorian semiology. That was how Cardine s Gregorian semiology was born we wrote it together with Rupert Fisher from the Abbey of Metten. There is a legend about Cardine that he was never satisfied with any performance. Is that legend true? It might have been so. He never said it but it is likely that there was no performance that sounded as he wanted. I remember when in 978 I called Luigi Agustoni, Alberto Turco, Nino Albarosa, Rupert Fisher, and Berschmans Göschl to Münsterschwarzach and we worked together on restoration of melodies. Cardine came to see us from 978 984. After that, he was too old to travel he was almost eighty years old. Once we said: Dom Cardine, now we will sing to you Alleluia Pascha nostrum. I asked one of my fellow monks to record the performance. He was so excited of the presence of Cardine that he did not Page 8/

4 pay enough attention to the recording. When we listened to the recording, there was only noise. We were singing at least an hour only the iubilus of this Alleluia. Of course, if you put all these characters together into one schola, it is very likely that the result is not good. No, no no, said Cardine. We sang repeatedly and still he said No, no, no. Nobody was able to sing what he wanted. Everybody sang what they have been singing for many years. Was he himself able to sing what he imagined to be a perfect performance? Cardine only gave an idea of how it should be. You had to realize that with your own voice. One of Cardine s students, Michiko Hirayama, is convinced that Cardine had a marvellous singing technique. Not only as a performer of Gregorian melodies but as a vocalist generally. I think that he was able to give very nice details how you should understand a particular neume or a movement. The way he thought about neumes was not achievable vocally to anybody, not even to himself. Why did Cardine leave Solesmes to go to teach in Rome? I think that they sent Cardine away from Solesmes. When Joseph Gajard was a schola master and Cardine became more and more aware that Gregorian chant in Solesmes is not properly sung, what happened was that they sent him to Rome. That was the only reason. It is not possible to combine the Cardine and the Solesmes way of singing. It is like fire and water this is how Cardine thought. Cardine was your teacher and example. Is there anybody else who you consider as your teacher? No. Before Cardine, I did not even like Gregorian chant. I do not want to call myself a musician but I had a certain affinity to music. For me chant was [Godehard knocks steady rhythm on the table] drill. I was educated in Solesmes style. [Godehard sings the beginning of Ad te levavi in a rhythmically very measured manner and keeps knocking on the table in the same rhythm]. That is how our schola master taught us Gregorian chant when I entered the monastery as a novice. He always tapped the rhythm. Therefore, I did not like that Gregorian chant. It all changed in Rome on October 957. It was. when Cardine came first time to do a lesson with all students of theology. [Godehard Page 9/

44 sighs and leaves a very long pause]. It was so different. It was first time when I heard that somebody is giving sound to the words and not rhythm. For me it was a conversion from Saulus to Paulus. That was a new beginning for me in Gregorian chant. Page /

45 Appendix Figure (additional). Different possibilities of reception of MSLM.

TP TP TP TP TP TP TP PT Arvo PT Räägitakse, PT. PT "Credo" PT Ansambel PT Kuldar PT Ilmselt 46 Appendix 4 This interview transcription is in Estonian. The initial plan of this dissertation was to become a study of different receptions of medieval sacred Latin monody. This interview was made to describe reception through adaptation. When the idea of overall reception study was abandoned, I decided not to use my resource to translate the whole interview into English. However, as I use some examples to illustrate a brief description of different forms of reception of MSLM I decided to add this interview transcript as an appendix. The translations in the text are by Alar Helstein and Eerik Jõks. Arvo and Nora Pärt approved this interview transcript on 6 October 9. This appendix has double page numbers: () on the top of the page, there is a general page number of this volume; () on the bottom of the page, there is page number of this particular interview transcript. The latter consists of two numbers. The first represents a current page number and the second the overall number of pages of this interview transcript. Intervjuu Arvo ja Nora Pärdiga 5. aasta suvel.tp PT Eerik Jõks: Te olete öelnud, et kui te gregooriuse laulu esimest korda kuulsitetp PT, siis see Teile vapustava mulje. Mis aastal see oli? jättis 4 Arvo Pärt: See oli enne Kolmandat sümfooniat TP PT ja peale Credot TP PT. Umbes 969, aga ma võin ka eksida. Sellest muljest oli aga vähe kasu, sest meil ei olnud võimalik seda plaati kuskilt saada, rääkimata nootidest. Siis aga algas Eestis üks imelik protsess. Enne Hortus 5 6 Musicuse tekkimisttp PT hakkasime me Kuldar SingigaTP PT huvi tundma varajase muusika ajaloo 7 vastu. Mingi inglise keelne muusikaajaloo raamattp PT meil oli ja sealt me tõlkisime. Osa materjali oli ka prantsuse keeles. Me lugesime neid koos ja arutasime, vaatasime ka ja Nora Pärt kiitsid intervjuu transkriptsiooni heaks 6..9. et Arvo Pärt kuulis gregooriuse laulu esimest korda, kui ta astus kauplusesse, kus mingil põhjusel mängis heliplaat gregooriuse laualuga. sümfoonia (97) Wenn Bach Bienen gezüchtet hätte klaverile, puhkpillikvintetile ja keelpillidele (976/) 4 segakoorile, klaverile ja orkestrile (968) 5 Hortus Musicus asutati 97. aastal. Aastal 977 salvestas ansambel heliplaadi, mille üks külg oli pühendatud gregooriuse laulule. Lähtuvalt Jerome Weberi gregooriuse laulu diskograafiast, oli see ainukese gregooriuse laulule pühendatud heliplaat Nõukogude Liidus. 6 Sink 94 995 7 oli tegu raamatuga Oxford New History of Music. Page /9

TP TP TP TP PT Mstislav PT Liber PT Peeter Pauli PT Mõeldud PT läbi 47 8 näiteid, mida kahjuks oli vähe. Ükskord ma sain kokku RostropovitšigaTP PT ja palusin, et ta hangiks mulle läänest mõned plaadid. Tema oli üks neid, kes lääne ja Venemaa vahet. Kaua aega ei olnud mingit vastust ja siis tuli äkki suur patakas plaate. Seal oli varajast polüfooniat ja ka gregooriuse laulu. Gregooriuse laulu oli ka, aga need olid saatega ja see meile kuidagi ei sobinud. Me ei võtnud seda päris puhtaverelise muusikana. Praegu ma lepin sellega, aga sellel ajal ütles vaist väga selgelt, et sa pead otsima seda ühte, ühte 9 liini. Kunagi, võibolla ka samaaegselt, ilmus välja üks Liber usualis.tp PT See pärines Vene tänava katoliku kirikust.tp PT Sellega ma tegelesin kohe põhjalikult. Elu läks edasi ja aegajalt me saime varajase muusika plaate. See ei puudutanud enam mitte gregooriuse laulu meid huvitas ka polüfoonia, eriti mitmehäälsuse tekkimine. See tundus olevat kõige tähtsam asi, sest me olime mitmehäälsuse sees kasvanud, me lausa uppusime selle sisse nii palju oli neid hääli uues muusikas. Ilma mitmehäälsuseta ei osanud keegi muusikat ette kujutadagi. Mida saab ütelda toonilise reaga ühehäälselt? Mina võtsin endale sihiks sukelduda täiesti ühehäälsuse sisse. Ma isegi ei tea miks, aga ma tundsin, et seal peab see võti olema muusika võti. Ma nägin sellega meeletult vaeva. Kõigepealt ma päevade viisi lihtsalt mängisin klaveril neid meloodiaid. Selle mõistmine võttis palju aega, sest klaveril mängides läks see kõik minust mööda. Ilmselt ma otsisin sellest muusikast midagi muud. Helikõrgused jäid minu jaoks ikka ainult helikõrgusteks ma lihtsalt libisesin neist üle. Sellist tunnetust muusikas, mis oleks võimaldanud mõista sidet kahe noodi vahel mul ei olnud. See oli üsna loomulik, kuna ma tegelesin palju aastaid seeriamuusikaga. Mõistmist, et muusikas on mingi hingamine või et kaks või kolm nooti võib olla palve, ei olnud. Vähehaaval hakkas kõik see kuidagimoodi omavahel kokku kasvama. Kõigepealt üksik noot, siis paar nooti siit ja paar nooti sealt. See juhtus läbi religiooni, läbi palve sõna,tp palve tunnetuse. Hing hakkas laulma sõna ei olnud mitte surnud, vaid sai kontakti südame ja kõrvaga. See kõik läks muusikasse. 8 Rostropovitš 97 7 9 Usualis ilmus esmatrükis 896. Raamatust on tehtud kümneid, kui mitte sadu kordustrükke. Raamat on ladina keeles, aga olemas on variandid põhjalike inglise ja prantsusekeelsete kommentaaridega. Mulle ei ole teada, millist trükki Arvo Pärt kasutas. kirik Vene tn 8, Tallinn on gregooriuse laulu teksti. Page /9

TP TP PT Arvo PT Psalm 48 See maja kus me olemetp PT, on ehitatud paar aastat tagasi. Meie oleme siin elanud ühe aasta. Ehitamine toimus võrdlemisi hoolikalt loodust püüti mitte lõhkuda. Palju kaeti ehituse ajaks kinni, et mitte lõhkuda pinnast. Siiski, kui me siia tulime, oli siin palju surnud maad, liivakõrbe. Me istutasime sinna mõned samblatükid, mis me metsast tõime ja sammal hakkas ennast ise laiemaks kasvatama. [Me läksime õue, kus Arvo näitas, kuidas roheline sammal aeglaselt kuid kindlalt kasvatas kinni tühja liiva. Õues olles rääkis Arvo kuidas ta näeb tühja liiva nagu haavatud maad. Kui sinna haava peale panna paar samblatupsu, siis hakkab liivale justkui uus nahk peale kasvama. See on elus kude. Erinevad samblatükikesed kasvavad kokku. See on sarnane sellele, kuidas tema jaoks hakkasid erinevad noodid kokku kasvama, moodustades elusa koe tema dodekafooniast haavatud loomingulisusele. Kui tuppa tagasi tulime, jätkas Arvo juttu samblast.] Arvo Pärt: Sammal hakkab kasvama, ta otsib kontakti teise samblaga. Sambla juured tõmbuvad sirutuvad üksteise poole. See on looduse loomulik elu või jõud ükskõik kuidas seda nimetada. Religioosse inimese jaoks on see nagu laul Jumala poole. See on nagu Psalmide raamatus: Vsajkoe dõhanie dahvalit Gospoda.TP PT Kas see on teadlik või mitteteadlik see polegi tähtis, aga see on olemas. Selline on see tunnetus. Midagi sellist juhtus ka minuga pika aja jooksul. Minu jaoks tähendas see muudatus, et ma hakkasin teisest küljest vaatama igat muusikalist liigutust, igat fraasi. See ei ole mitte ainult muusikaline nähtus vaid seda võib igast asjast välja lugeda. Ma kujutan ette, et tee gregooriuse laulu juurde võib olla ainult selline: räägitakse, et ei ole võimalik armastada teist inimest niisama lihtsalt; tõeline armastus käib kolmanda kaudu ja see kolmas on Jumal. Kõik käib sealtkaudu. See sarnaneb mobiiltelefoniga helistamisele. Kui mina helistan teile, siis signaal ei tule mitte minu telefonist teie telefoni, vaid käib läbi saatja. Midagi niisugust toimub lähenemise juures kunstiteosele või muusikale. Sama kehtib ka lähenemisel kadunud seosele või pärandile, mis on sajandite jooksul olnud. See muusika ei ole mitte paganarahva trummipõrin sellel oli oma substants sees. Nüüd me peame seda sama teed mööda sinna jõudma. ja Nora Pärdi maakodu Laulasmaal. 5:6 Kõik, kellel on eluõhku, kiitku Issandat. Page /9

TP PT Pärt 49 Inimene võib ju öelda: Kus on Jumal? Kuidas ma saan tema poole palvetada? Kogu see usuasi on üks kahtlane värk. Me võiksime seda vaadata nõnda: kõik mis on algusest olnud kuni meieni, on üks kindel niit, ükskõik kui õrn või varjatud see ei ole. See on nagu seeneniit. Seen kasvab ühes kohas, aga niit ulatub palju kaugemale. Terve mets on seda niidistikku täis. Selline niit on Jumala ja inimese vahel. Kui mul on hästi lihtsalt rääkides mure, siis kõik, mis ma pean tegema, on endale aru andma, et ma saan minna mööda seda niiti Jumala juurde. Mina tulen tänu sellele niidile Jumalast ja selle sama niidi kaudu ma võtan Temaga ühendust. Kas ma seda niit näen või mitte, see pole oluline see on olemas. Kui ma seda niiti tunnistan, siis see funktsioneerib nagu see mobiiltelefon. Ja seda teed kaudu peab gregooriuse laulu juurde minema. Vaimulik substants on nii tugev selles muusikas, et seda võib uskuda. See valgustab muidugi ühte külge gregooriuse laulust võibolla ka paljusid külgi aga seda kõrvale jätta oleks kahju. Peab arvestama, et paljud inimesed ei tunnista seda ja ei pea seda ka tähtsaks. Mulle tundub, et see on tähtis. Tähtis asi. Eerik Jõks: Gregooriuse laulus on peidus mitmeid arhetüüpe: notatsiooni arhetüüp, meloodika ja fraseerimise arhetüüp, aga seal on ka religioossuse arhetüüp. Minu jaoks on väga huvitav ja tähtis mõista, et Teie kujunemisel selliseks heliloojaks nagu Te olete, on kõige olulisem just religioosne arhetüüp, mitte kultuuriline või paleograafiline arhetüüp. 4 Arvo Pärt: See on nagu see termin võib küll jätta täiesti vale pildi mingi õigeusktp PT või ühine nimetaja. Erinevad arhetüübid tõstavad esile erinevaid väärtusi ja näevad seeläbi gregooriuse laulu keskpunkti erinevalt. Need on kõik nagu erinevad murrud. Aga vajalik on üks nimetaja, et nende murdudega opereerida. Kui neil on ühine nimetaja, siis on nad hoolimata oma erinevustest kokku pandavad ja nad hakkavad koos funktsioneerima. Ma arvan et see ühine nimetaja on religioon. Seda näeb selle järgi, kust see muusika tuleb ja kus seda tehti. Kirikud on ka muidugi erinevad, aga ka seal on ühine nimetaja olemas. Kui me seda ühist nimetajat ei otsi, siis on oht, et me muutume sektantideks. On olemas veel üks ühine nimetaja, mis on sünagoogimuusikal, bütsantsi muusikal, islami muusikal ja gregooriuse laulul. Seda kõike tuleb hoolega uurida ja seal võib näha 4 kardab, et teda mõistetakse valesti kuna ta on ise õigeusklik ehk siis Ida kiriku liige. Selles kontekstis aga tähendab õigeusk midagi muud. Page 4/9

4 imeasju. Tuleb neid vaadata distantsilt, nagu kosmoselaevalt, nii et erinevad maad ja mandrid pole enam eristatavad ning kõik traditsioonid on korraga haaratavad. Kui te küsite, mida tähendab gregooriuse laul meile tänapäeval, siis minu meelest aeg ei mängi siin mitte mingit rolli. Ta tähendab seda sama peaks tähendama mida ta alati on tähendanud. Need inimesed, kes siis elasid, vajasid täpselt samamoodi armastust, nagu igaüks meist vajab armastust. Inimeste probleemid on ikka ühed ja samad nii praegu, kui gregooriuse laulu kuldajal. Tuhat aastat, kaks tuhat aastat see ei maksa midagi. Me kanname endaga kaasas igavesi sõlmpunkte, mis korduvad aastast aastasse ja sajandist sajandisse. Seda peab vaatama nagu igavesi küsimusi meile on see raske, sest igavik on pikk ja haaramatu. Andeksandmine, kaastunne, armastus ühelt poolt ja vihkamine, verejanu ja ihnsus teiselt poolt see on kõik see sama, mis vanal ajal oli. Võibolla väline vorm on muutunud, aga inimene on ikka samasugune. Ega ta selle pärast paremaks ei ole muutunud, et aastat on mööda läinud. Ehk on isegi vastupidi ta on veel rafineeritumaks muutunud. Inimesele on antud vaba tahe ja selle vaba tahtega võib ta minna selles suunas, mis on alati olnud kõige raskem suund. See on see ainus elu, see ainus idu, mis võib meid kadunud kunstide juures. Toitmine võib toimuda kaudselt või otseselt, olenevalt sellest, kuivõrd aktiivselt, kuivõrd ehtsalt, kuivõrd kompromissitult me selles suunas läheme. Nora Pärt: Arvo tahab öelda, et suhe Jumalaga gregooriuse laulu kaudu on ühtsus Temaga. See oli nõnda vanasti ja on ka praegu. Olukorrad on muutunud, värvid on segatud, aga tuum on ikka sama. Eerik Jõks: See tähendab, et kui keegi saab gregooriuse laulust inspiratsiooni, eriti selle religioossest arhetüübist, siis ei pruugi tema inspiratsiooni tulemuses gregooriuse laul olla äratuntav. Vähemalt mitte sellisena, nagu me seda tänapäeval esteetiliselt ette kujutame. [ ] Eerik Jõks: Kas pole huvitav, et kui ma laulan ühehäälselt [Eerik laulab I advendi algussalmide Ad te levavi esimesed sõnad], siis see ei ole alati kaasaja inimesele mõistetav. Kui ma aga lisan sellele burdooni, siis hakkab see muusika enamatega Page 5/9

TP PT Garbarek, 4 kõnelema. Inimene justkui mõistab, et selles on midagi vaimulikku, mida ta lihtsa ühehäälsuse juures ei pruugi tajuda. Nora Pärt: See muusika on puhtal kujul liiga kõva toit tänapäeval. Eerik Jõks: Kas on ikka nii? Nora Pärt: On ikka, sest kõrv on rikutud. Arvo Pärt: See on tõsi kõrv on rikutud. Nora Pärt: Mõni peab oma kõrva puhastama, enne kui ta seda muusikat puhtal kujul saab 5 vastu võtta. Mõned inimesed vajavad jälle sellist muusikat nagu pakkus Officium.TP PT See muusika oli paljudele inimestele avastus selles suunas, sest nende kõrv suutis seda vastu võtta. Paljudele oli see püha elamus ja seda peab austama. Tuum peitub puhtas gregooriuse laulus. Kuna traditsioon on läbi lõigatud ja mitte ainult gregooriuse laulul, vaid kogu religioossuse argipäeval, siis see tuum on hajunud. Tuum on alles, aga side sellega on rikutud. Eerik Jõks: Mulle tundub, et tänapäeva inimese vaimulik puudutamine ühehäälse muusikaga on väga raske ülesanne. Nora Pärt: See on sellepärast, et ühehäälses muusikas on palju vähem emotsiooni ja palju rohkem vaimsust. Vaim on puhas, nagu kõrgmäestiku õhk. Emotsioon on nagu sild meie keha ja meie vaimu vahel. Emotsioon aga lohutab paremini, on magusam, on subjektiivsem ja seega ka lihtsamini saavutatav. Eerik Jõks: Mul on olnud kogemus inimestega, kes küsivad: Kui gregooriuse laul on Arvo Pärt i ja tema muusikat nii palju mõjutanud, siis miks me seda ei kuule? 5 Jan, Cristóbal de Morales, and Hilliard Ensemble. Officium. ECM 994. Page 6/9

4 Arvo Pärt: Pange kõrvuti Credo müra, siis gregooriuse laul ja siis näiteks In spe või De profundis ja siis te kuulete seda liikumist. Nora Pärt: Kui te seda kuuleksite, siis oleks see muuseumi töö. See ei olnud Arvo siht ta otsis lähtepunkti, reegleid, mõtteviisi. Ta kasvatas endale uue kõrva. Arvo Pärt: Gregooriuse laul oli platvormiks, et inimese hing hakkaks laulma. See on platvormiks, et aru saada, et niisugune asi on üldse olemas nagu hing. Gregooriuse laul on meile sellepärast tähtis, et inimese hing hakkaks laulma, et hing õpiks palvetama koos lauluga. Palve on selles laulus sees, see ongi see substants, millest me rääkisime. See on palve, ei midagi muud. Ta ei ole mingi kunst, mida peab seatud häälega esitama. See peaks olema midagi väga lihtsat, midagi niisugust: [Arvo mängib salvestist, millel palvetab vene keeles preester Nikolai, mis vaheldub koguduse vastustega. Nende kohta ütleb Arvo:] Need on nii lihtsad nagu lapse palve. Ei midagi kunstlikku. Nora Pärt: Meil oli kunagi üks salvestis Valamo kloostrist, millel vanad raugad laulsid. Nad olid eluaeg koos laulnud. Nad laulsid raugalike ragisevate häältega, aga nende kolme munga laul kõlas nagu üks hing. Ei olnud ei pause ega fraseerimist see oli kõik oli koos viisi ja sõnadega ammu luudes ja kontides. Nende laul läks lausa lendu seda oli nii hea kuulata. Arvo Pärt: Selline nagu isa Nikolai laul võis ka gregooriuse laul kunagi olla. Nora Pärt: Kas Sa mõtled spontaansust? Arvo Pärt: Pigem ma nimetaksin seda lähenemiseks. Selliseid inimesi on üksikuid. Nad ei tee plaate, ega esine kontsertidel. Nad selle muusika juure juures palju loomulikumalt ja nad saavad sellest aru. Nad võiksid meile muusikast palju rääkida. Sellised mehed olid vana kirikumuusika loojad. Hiljem pandi sellele teine rüü selga ja tehti kirikule käepärasemaks. Võibolla tehti muusikat pisut uhkemaks, lihvitumaks, rafineeritumaks. Seda kõike ma täpselt ei tea, aga igal juhul ei tohi me rafineeritusega sellele muusikale läheneda. Osake maailmast on niikuinii juba seal sees maailm tungib ju igale poole. Kirik Page 7/9

4 paneb uksed kinni ja ta tuleb aknast sisse. See ei ole alati õige asi mis sisse tuleb. Selline lähenemine gregooriuse laulule nagu isa Nikolail aitaks meil sellest muusikast palju suuremaid väärtusi välja tuua. Kirikuajaloos me teame suuri muudatusi. Kui kerjusmunk Fransiscus tuli, siis ta lõi kogu ehitatud mängu sassi. Pärast võttis tema töö muidugi hoopis teise pöörde. Fransiskaanlus läks niiöelda liiga täiuslikuks ja lihvituks. Aga Fransiscus ise oli midagi erilist ja puhast. Luterlusega võis ka olla midagi sellist. Ma ei tea väga täpselt, mis mees see Luther oli, aga mul on selline tunne, et Luther kujutas midagi muud ette, kui seda, mis luterlikust kirikust pärast välja tuli. Eerik Jõks: Selle kohta on hea ütlus: Luther oli hea katoliiklane kuni elu lõpuni. Arvo Pärt: [naerab] See kõlab väga hästi. Ainult puhtuse ja aukartusega tuleb minna sellele varandusele [gregooriuse laulule] ligi. Eerik Jõks: Ma arvan, et ainult niimoodi saab sellele varandusele ligi. Pealisehitusele saab ka teisiti ligi. Kogu selle materjali vaatlemisel saab piirduda ainult kultuurifenomeni vaatlemisega. Oli suuline traditsioon, 9 sajandil hakati seda üles kirjutama, tekkis notatsioon ja nüüd ma uurin näiteks, kuidas see tekkis ja kuidas see arenes. See jääb aga ainult pealisehituseks. Kui aga tahta gregooriuse laulu tuuma juurde jõuda, siis peab ikka otsima eelpoolnimetatud ühist nimetajat. Nora Pärt: Siis jõuab ka teiste teemadega kaugemale. Ühine nimetaja teeb ka teised uksed lahti ja aitab seletada gregooriuse laulu, kui kultuurifenomeni. Eerik Jõks: Paljud inimesed ei taha seda siiski tõdeda ja nad vaatlevadki gregooriuse laulu nagu ühte kultuurifenomeni või nagu esteetiliselt kaunist meloodiat. Arvo Pärt: See ei tohi meid segada. Me peame vaatama, kuidas me ise saame kontakti sellega. Kõik muu ei tohi meid huvitada. See on muidugi okkaline tee. Seda teed käies lähevad käed krobeliseks ja juuksed lähevad halliks see kuulub sinna juurde ja ei tohi meile muret valmistada. Me peame iseendaga tegelema ainult iseendaga. Me peame Page 8/9

44 oma patusust, oma jõuetust, oma mittetäiuslikust nägema ja selle eest palvetama, et Jumal meid valgustaks ja meie peale halastaks. See on ainus tee gregooriuse laulu juurde. Kui Jumal meie peale halastab, siis see halastus väljendubki selles, et me hakkame gregooriuse laulu nägema teises valguses. Siis gregooriuse laul avab ennast. Me ise oleme gregooriuse laulu lukustanud oma kivinenud hoiakutega. Me muretseme, kuidas teised meie peale vaatavad, mis nad meist arvavad ja kas nad meist aru saavad. See on ohvririkas tee. Kui see küsimus on tõesti hingelähedane, siis võibki alguses olla tähelepanu all midagi, mis ei ole kõige tähtsam. Esimeseks tähelepanuks võib olla gregooriuse laulu muusikaliste saladuste teadasaamine ja pärast olgu siis peale ma tegelen oma hingega kah kui aega üle jääb ja raha ka natuke. Sellest ei ole midagi. Mul oli see täpselt samuti. Minu jaoks oli alguses muusika kõige tähtsam. Aeg sätib prioriteedid paika. Las nad olla nii nagu nad on, aga elu õpetab, et on [muusikast] tähtsamad asjad ees, mis tuleb inimesel endal uurijal lahendada. Gregooriuse laulule võib läheneda ainult puhta südamega. Kes võtab kätte gregooriuse laulu laulmise või uurimise, peab tundma, et ta ei ole selle vääriline, et avada seda raamatut. Kes saab siin aidata peale Ühe? Seda ei saa päevapealt teha, tuleb leppida oma ebatäiuslikkuse ja ebapuhtusega ning loota, et sellest on võimalik vabaneda. Võibolla ei saa me kunagi selle vääriliseks, et seda raamatut [Arvo koputab laual olevale Graduale Triplex ile] lahti teha. Aga Jumal näeb Sinu head tahet ja Ta tuleb sulle vastu. Ta ütleb nendele nootidele siin raamatus: Kuule, mine talle vastu, mine talle paar sammu vastu. Ja siis juhtub ime. [pikk vaikus, mis on ometi täis muusikat] See muusika on ime. Imega saab kontakti ainult läbi ime. See on alati kingitus peab sündima ime, et sellele [gregooriuse laulule] ligi saada. Selleks aga peab imedesse uskuma, peab üldse uskuma ja lootma. Peab olema nagu laps, kellel ei ole eelarvamusi. Peab olema lihtsa meelega. Peab olema valmis selle eest ka kannatama. Nora Pärt: Lihtsameelsus on võti. Kui rääkida erinevusest vana aja inimeste ja meie vahel, siis just lihtsameelsuse kaotamises seisnebki suurim vahe. Inimkond kaotas iga sekundiga lihtsameelsust ja see ütleb väga palju. Arvo Pärt: Puhtus, süütus ja lihtsameelsus. [Peale seda jätkus meil juttu veel pikalt, aga kõike ei ole võimalik selle doktoritöö raames üles kirjutada. Loodan, et kunagi on mul võimalik selle erakordselt rikka teksti juurde tagasi pöörduda.] Page 9/9

TP PT Godehard 45 Appendix 5 This appendix has double page numbers: () on the top of the page, there is a general page number of this volume; () on the bottom of the page, there is page number of this particular interview transcript. The latter consists of two numbers. The first represents a current page number and the second the overall number of pages of this interview transcript. Interview with Professor Godehard Joppich in Frankfurt, on December 8 Introduction After the first interview with Professor Godehard Joppich on..5 I could not rest before I returned to Frankfurt to ask more questions about some aspects of life and work of Eugène Cardine and learn more chanting. I was particularly interested in what stage was Eugène Cardine s study of neumes when he was called to Rome in 95. Additional comments of Godehard also made additional clarifications about the theory of banishment. As always we had a lot of things to talk about, but not all the questions were relevant for this research. For example, it took some time to discuss future work with the chant section of Michiko Hirayama s sound archive that Godehard had received from Michiko. In this archive there are the only known recordings of Eugène Cardine performing, as well as recordings from lessons that he gave to Michiko Hirayama. All this information is recorded and is preserved in my archive. However, in this transcription, only information relevant to this research is included. For the technicalities of this interview and transcription, please refer to the introduction of Interview with Professor Godehard Joppich in Frankfurt..5 6 (Appendix ). This transcription was sent to Professor Joppich for his approval.tp PTP 6 Joppich approved this interview transcript on 8..9. Page /5

TP PT Professor 46 The interview When you met Eugène Cardine in 957, was his understanding of neumes already fully developed? Not completely developed. For example, he was still convinced that each neume has an accent on the first note. This is completely wrong. About 96 6, I wrote my first article about torculus specialis. After reading it, Cardine commented: Every neume has accent on the first note, except torculus specialis. Was it the understanding of Joseph Pothier that every neume has an accent on its first note? Yes, it was Pothier. Mocquereau s principle was that accents go according to groups of and. It is important for history to know how far Cardine s understanding of neumes was developed when he came to Rome in 95. I believe his understanding was already scholarly. In Solesmes at this time, and probably until now, they actually sing according to Pothier s principles. Anyhow, years ago when 7 Cardine died, they sang according to Pothier s principles.tp PT They never sang according to Mocquereau s principles. One thing for Cardine was studying neumes but the other was singing according to this study. He was able to study neumes but it was not possible to sing according to this study in Solesmes. Only when he went to Rome did he start to realize his scholarly work. Until then, it was just a study of signs. Perhaps he tried out different possibilities for himself, but to realize this in Solesmes was impossible. How do you think, did Cardine also propose his ideas to Gajard? I do not think that he spoke about it to Gajard. I am convinced that even if he had shared his thoughts with him, a man like Gajard would never change his manner of understanding chant. 7 Joppich means that the style was definitely the same years ago when Cardine died, but he was not sure about the situation now as he had not been to Solesmes since then. Page /5

TP TP TP TP PT Page PT Page PT Page PT A PT They 47 I understand that, but it is a very long time from 98 95. Something must have become known about his ideas. His solemn vows were 9 and he started his work after that. Only then was he able to go alone to the Paleo [a manuscript room in Solesmes]. Before taking solemn vows, it was forbidden for novices to go to the Paleo unaccompanied. Therefore, only in 9 did he have a chance to look at the manuscripts. Of course, he did not know at this time what was going to happen he was just curious to see the manuscripts or the photos of the manuscripts. You can see it here [Godehard takes the Graduel Neumé]. He started with the same piece that I started with years afterwards. He told me that the first 8 9 pieces he copied were the Introits Exurge,TP PT Ciricumdederunt me,tp PT and Esto mihi.tp PT Here he started to copy neumes, as he was convinced that it is important to know what neumes communicate to us. This happened in 9? I would not say 9, but 9. We will probably never know. Of course, he had his duties in the community. It was not possible for him to sit all day and study manuscripts. I know that he was an organist and he had to accompany singing of psalms during the Office. He had to do it always using the same sequence of chords. He could never change even one chord. I accompanied the Office in my monastery for many years using different registrations and different harmonies. I asked him once why he did not change the harmony. He said No, no, no I was not allowed. I have to use only these harmonies. These harmonies were repeated in some cases times, if it was necessary. When Rome asked for one teacher for Gregorian chant in 95 it appeared to be the best solution to send Cardine to Rome. They used a principle promoveatur et amoveatur.tp were glad that he went to Rome and it was quiet again in Solesmes. [ ] 8 9 66 in the Graduel neumé 6 in the Graduel neumé 69 in the Graduel neumé translation of this Latin phrase in English would be: Let him be promoted to get him out of the way. Page /5

TP TP PT When PT I 48 I am very interested in this one single question of Cardine going to Rome. I have several quotes from his friends that he was unhappy about leaving Solesmes. How do you comment? I think it is true. When school finished on the day of St Peter and St Paul on 9 June he left Rome immediately. On the same evening, he took a train to Paris where his sister lived and after that, he went straight to Solesmes. He did not stay there for one hour more than necessary. He loved his home and he loved Solesmes. For me it was difficult to study with him in Solesmes. He was a monk of Solesmes and he lived the life of Solesmes in every way. I remember that once I was in Solesmes and we were standing on the opposite sides of the choir. When he was singing he was nodding TP PT the book according to the rhythm of Solesmes singing style. I admired his love towards his home monastery. I asked him: how can you stay here and still sing Mocquereau s system? He replied that it is not straightforwardly Mocquereau s system; rather it is Pothier s system. But Pothier s system was like [Godehard sings a short example in a rather floating manner but stressing first notes of every neume element]. You can here it on recordings of Solesmes. Cardine was able to adapt to life and singing in Solesmes for three and a half months until he returned to Rome on 5 October. He was happy in Solesmes. He was happy. If Gajard was convinced that he was teaching Mocquereau s system and Solesmes was never actually using it, what was it that he taught? When he went to teach, he taught Mocquereau, but in Solesmes they still performed according to Pothier. When people came to Solesmes, they were confused, because they did not hear what they had learned from Gajard. If people wanted to hear how Mocquereau s rhythm sounded they had to go to another monastery,tp PT where Mocquereau s system was followed. Cardine always told me that it was not possible to switch in the community from one performance practice to another. It was impossible. During the time of Mocquereau, there were still so many monks who sang according to the system of Pothier. It was not editing the transcript Godehard used following wording: bewegte er sein Buch entsprechend der Solesmer Gesangsweise. This can also be translated he moved his book according to the Solesmes singing style. I used the word nodding to communicate what Godehard wanted to say: namely, when Cardine was singing according to his understanding, his hands were drawing neumes in the air. When he was performing at Solesmes, the movement was drastically different. do not know which monastery Joppich refers to. I only know that it is a nunnery. Page 4/5

49 possible for Mocquereau s system to be realised. Novices studied the Mocquereau system but they never performed accordingly in Solesmes. It would be very interesting to know what was the relationship between Gajard and Cardine. That we probably will never know. When was Graduel Neumé finished? I do not know exactly when it was finished. I think that all neumes were already copied when he was called to Rome. The indexing of course continued. In 96, I made the first copies of Graduel Neumé by using photos. When they heard in Solesmes that I was already circulating the Graduel Neumé, the director of the Solesmes Editions said that we must print it. Solesmes printed the first version in 966. [ ] Cardine s obligation in Rome was not to teach the performance of chant. There was another teacher for that. Cardine was teaching paleography. I remember that I went to Raffael Barrata to sing. After that, you had to forget everything before you went to study with Cardine, because it was so different. Only when Cardine left Musica Sacra did they start officially to teach semiology. [ ] Page 5/5

4 Appendix 6 Questionnaire for Performers and Experts of Gregorian chant in English This questionnaire was compiled in two languages English and Estonian. The latter version is available as Appendix 7. Text in the square brackets is not the part of the questionnaire and is added for better reading qualities. For the respondents who did not want to answer the questionnaire online a printed version was created, which is available as Appendix 8. The appendix is in A5 format and can be found in a pocket on the back cover of the volume. When the questionnaire was compiled, the house style of the University was not followed. I decided to add the questionnaire to the appendix as it was presented to the respondents. Therefore, there are some differences from the house style of the University. Questionnaire for Performers and Experts of Gregorian chant Introduction Dear [Respondent], Thank you for participating in this project. Your personal and unique contribution is highly appreciated and, without it, this research project would not be imaginable. A significant number of performers and experts of Gregorian chant from all over the world have agreed to participate, and I am convinced that the results provide interesting and valuable answers to questions of chant interpretation. The role of Gregorian chant in Western musical culture, as it seems, is irreplaceable and its investigation is of utmost importance. It is only you, the people who perform and study the chant that can provide the answers and information that this project needs. As far as I know, this international questionnaire is the first of its kind, and strives to study aspects of chant interpretation in a way that have not been done before. This is why your expert opinion is of such value. The objective if this questionnaire is to investigate styles of performance, both in their current use, and their historical formation and individual characteristics. Your

4 responses will remain completely confidential and anonymous, although the author knows your person and name. As exception, I ask permission to publicize your name in one aspect: the question involving your chant teachers and models. This is necessary to create a genealogy tree of Gregorian chant performers. In this questionnaire, the term Gregorian chant is used in a wide sense, meaning both the repertory of different liturgical families of mediaeval Western church, and their current reflections in literature and performance. The questions will appear on your screen one by one. After you have provided a response, a new question will be displayed automatically. Several of the questions ask you to estimate certain statements on a scale. For convenience, the verbal equivalents of the scale values are provided by the author and will be displayed together with every subquestion. Please note that a fully personal and subjective response, rather than an established opinion, is what is most expected. Some of the questions may seem to repeat themselves: this is not done for the purpose of a cross examination but there are subtle differences in their wordings, and I would very much like to know your opinion about it. At every moment, you can take a break and return later by clicking on the respective link Pause and return later, on the screen. When returning to complete the questionnaire at another time, please click on the link in the e mail that was sent to you. If you would like to correct or change your answers, this can be done the end of the questionnaire. It has proved that completing this questionnaire takes approximately 6 minutes. This can vary because some of the questions are rather specific and may suggest taking more time and concentration to answer. Since your opinion is very important for this research project, we hope that it is possible for you to complete it thoroughly. In case of any questions or suggestions, you are welcome to e mail to the author at the address eerik@ekn.ee. Again, thank you whole heartedly for your patience and help.

4 [Questions].. What does Gregorian chant mean for you? (both as a term and as a phenomenon) Please evaluate the following statement[s] on a scale of 8. () In no way means that. () Essentially does not mean that. () Means that to a small extent but not significantly. (4) Means that to a certain extent. (5) Means that to a moderate extent. (6) Means that to a great extent, belonging in fact to the essential meanings. (7) Is one of the most essential meanings. (8) Is the primary meaning, the most essential, for me.. Gregorian chant, for me, means a way of life.. Gregorian chant, for me, means the foundation of European professional musical culture.. Gregorian chant, for me, means Franco Roman chant, a part of Latin sacred monody. 4. Gregorian chant, for me, means exciting repertory that can be used to fill concert programs. 5. Gregorian chant, for me, means any kind of monodic Latin liturgical chant. 6. Gregorian chant, for me, means beautiful melodies. 7. Gregorian chant, for me, means inspiration for my musical activities. 8. Gregorian chant, for me, means an opportunity for career enhancement. 9. Gregorian chant, for me, means Roman Catholic liturgical music.. Gregorian chant, for me, means an opportunity to investigate mediaeval notation.. Gregorian chant, for me, means liturgical song, to be interpreted according to certain rules.. Gregorian chant, for me, means a collection of mediaeval manuscripts and liturgical texts.. Gregorian chant, for me, means a broad based domain of musicology and liturgics. 4. Gregorian chant, for me, means a method of composing liturgical music. 5. Gregorian chant, for me, means sacred text, illuminated by music. 6. Gregorian chant, for me, means a way of musical thinking.

4 7. Gregorian chant, for me, means musical text, performed in a theatrical manner. 8. Gregorian chant, for me, means prayer. 9. Gregorian chant, for me, means mediaeval monodic liturgical chant of the Western church based on the Roman rite.. Gregorian chant, for me, means a bridge to Pre Christian cultures and spiritualities.. Gregorian chant, for me, means thematically coherent and textually complete repertory for the whole church year.. Gregorian chant, for me, means meaningful texts.. Gregorian chant, for me, means an opportunity to introduce interesting music and its underlying spirituality to the audience. 4. Gregorian chant, for me, means a form of teaching about the Word of God and what the teaching expresses. 5. Gregorian chant, for me, means a part of my activities as musician. 6. Gregorian chant, for me, means one vocal repertory among many others. 7. Gregorian chant, for me, means a boring duty that I need to do routinely. If in your opinion any meaning is missing, please add and evaluate it on a scale of 8. 8.. Gregorian chant means for me.... 4. Please name in the order of importance up to persons that, for you, appear as key figures in Gregorian chant through all the centuries, such as singers, musicologists, clergy, Church politicians. 4. 74. What do you consider important for a good performance of Gregorian chant? Please evaluate the following statement[s] on a scale of 8. () Is in no way essential to a good performance of Gregorian chant. () Is rather insignificant from the point of view of a good performance of Gregorian chant. ( Is a credit but not a decisive factor for a good performance. (4) Is recommendable but not mandatory. (5) Is sufficiently important to deserve a special emphasis but should not be overestimated.

44 (6) Is recommendable that every performer makes serious efforts to achieve it. (7) Is one of the most essential aspects for a good performance of Gregorian chant. (8) Is completely indispensable for a good performance of Gregorian chant. 4. Agogic variety (subtle changes of tempo related to phrasing). 4. Excellent articulation. 44. Variety of dynamics. 45. Musical phrasing. 46. Excellent diction. 47. Excellent vocal quality. 48. A personal contribution to the exegesis of text. 49. Knowledge of the historical background of the music that is performed. 5. An idiolectic (personal and original) approach to the music that is performed. 5. Respecting the individualities of the 8 modes. 5. Passive comprehension of the Latin language (on the level of understanding the meanings of words). 5. Singer s belief in the text that is performed. 54. General musicality of the performer. 55. Liturgical environment. 56. Imitation of one s teacher. 57. Singing from memory. 58. The aim of performing in as authentic manner as possible. 59. Religious intention. 6. A rhetorical approach to the music that is performed. 6. Avoiding a routine interpretation. 6. Semiological precision. 6. An accurate costume. 64. An accurate venue for performance. 65. Textual narrative. 66. Theoretical knowledge of paleography. 67. Theoretical knowledge of semiology. 68. Excellent intonation.

45 69. Following the right style of chant performance. 7. Understanding of what the text means. 7. Animated performance. If any aspect, in your opinion, is missing, please add and evaluate it on a scale of 8. 7. 74. For a good interpretation of Gregorian chant, for me it is important to have 75. 84. Please name in the order of importance up to persons that, for you, are key figures in Gregorian chant from the beginning of the 9th century, such as singers, musicologists, clergy, Church politicians. The same names that appeared in the list above can be repeated. 85. 95. How would you characterize the relationship between music and text in Gregorian chant? Please evaluate the following statement[s] on a scale of 8. () In no way means that. () Essentially does not mean that. () Means that to a small extent but not significantly. (4) Means that to a certain extent. (5) Means that to a moderate extent. (6) Means that to a great extent, belonging in fact to the essential meanings. (7) Is one of the most essential meanings. (8) Is the primary meaning, the most essential, for me. 85. This relationship means that music and text are inseparable, i.e. they absolutely belong together. 86. This relationship means that music and text are different structures but they exist together in unity, functioning as complementary to each other. 87. This relationship means that music is only a means of transmitting the text, i.e. the text is what is essential, and music only helps to express it. 88. This relationship means that music constitutes a paraphrase of the text, i.e. music contains/carries the meaning of the text even without the text itself.

46 89. This relationship means that text and music in Gregorian chant are related as much as in any other vocal repertory. 9. This relationship means that music is included in the prosodic intonation of the text and is brought forward by enhancement. 9. This relationship means that music and text are different structures, which have been combined together. 9. This relationship means that music has been forced upon the text and earns its merits at the expense of the text. 9. This relationship means that the text is saying the same as what is narrated by the music. 94. 95. If any characterization of this relationship is missing, please add and evaluate it on a scale of 8. 96. If, in your opinion, the logic of the text diverges from the logic of the music, which of the two would you prefer? Please choose an answer. () Logic of the text, in the first place. () Logic of the music, in the first place. () Sometimes one, sometimes the other. (4) In my opinion, in Gregorian chant logic of the text and music never diverge from each other. 97. 6. How precisely, in your opinion, is it possible to restore, on the basis of the information available to us, a historically authentic performance practice of mediaeval Gregorian chant of the Einsiedeln and St Gallen region? (7th to 6th centuries) () Completely impossible. () Possible to a small extent. () Possible to a rather great extent. (4) Fully possible to restore. (5) I have no relevance in this.

47 97. 7th cent. 98. 8th cent. 99. 9th cent.. th cent.. th cent.. th cent.. th cent. 4. 4th cent. 5. 5th cent. 6. 6th cent. 7. 9. Many performers consider authenticity as an essential aspect of performing Gregorian chant. What does "authenticity" mean to you? Please evaluate the following statement[s] on a scale of 8. () In no way means that. () Essentially does not mean that. () Means that to a small extent but not significantly. (4) Means that to a certain extent. (5) Means that to a moderate extent. (6) Means that to a great extent, belonging in fact to the essential meanings. (7) Is one of the most essential meanings. (8) Is the primary meaning, the most essential, for me. 7. Singing exactly the same way as in the time when the music was created. 8. Singing in a way that the music, precisely at the time of performance, sounds honest and genuine. 9. Singing in a way that music fits well into the context where it is performed.. What is your musical education? () I have no special musical education. () I have elementary musical education. () I have a higher musical education. (4) I have a masters or doctoral (or equivalent) degree in music. If yes, what degree do hold and from which institution?

48. When (what year) did you start your activities concerning Gregorian chant?. Please name, in chronological order where you have studied Gregorian chant. (schools, ensembles, master classes). Please name your Gregorian chant teachers. 4. Other than your teachers, what other people have influenced your chant interpretation? 5. What other factors have influenced your chant interpretation? 6. What sources (both mediaeval and modern) do you use for performing or studying Gregorian chant? 7. 9. If you were able to travel back in time to study Gregorian chant performance, and had 7 minutes at your disposal, where would you go and how would you spend the 7 minutes? 7. I would go back to the year 8. I would go back to (the location) 9. I would spend my 7 minutes.... Please have a look at the two beginning words of gradual Haec dies. When performing this song, which notes do you perceive as having equal durations? Please build up to 4 groups of these notes, marking the notes with equal durations. For example, 'notes 4 and 5 have an equal duration' or 'notes, 4, 5, and have an equal duration'.

49. When singing, we deliver notes of different durations. Assuming, that the increased value of duration can arise from either extending the duration of an individual note/individual notes, or slowing down the tempo, which of the two options do you use in Gregorian chant performance? () I extend the duration of the note. () I slow down the tempo. () In the middle of the phrase I extend the duration of the note, at the end of the phrase I slow down the tempo. (4) It depends. (5) I wish to describe with my own words.. 6. Please name in the order of importance in your opinion up to 5 most important events for Gregorian chant through all the centuries (such as decisions of the Church Councils, activity of certain persons, appearance or rediscovering of certain manuscripts, scholarly discoveries). 7. Do you sing more at concerts or at church services? Please choose an answer. () at concerts. () at church services. () or less equally.

4 8. Do you experience performing for recording as different from the usual performing, not considering the recording specific aspects? Please choose an answer. () Yes () No 9. When recording, what do you do differently from the usual performance? Please describe with your own words.. How often do you sing, conduct, or study Gregorian chant? Please choose an answer. () Several times a day. () Almost every day. () At least once a week. (4) At least once a month. (5) Few times a year or less.. Do you sing/conduct or study music other than Gregorian chant? Please choose an answer. () Yes () No. What kind of repertory do you sing/conduct or study, other than Gregorian chant?. 9. Please name, in chronological order, in which Gregorian chant groups/ensembles you have participated. 9. 4. Please name in the order of importance up to 5, in your opinion most important scholarly discoveries in the domain of Gregorian chant from the beginning of the 9th century.

4 44. If you were asked to summarize in three sentences on what principles your chant performance is based, how would you do that? [Section of personal information] All answers concerning your religious beliefs and practices are fully anonymous and confidential. The author of the questionnaire will not connect your answers with your name and your person. 45. How often do you attend church services, i.e. the mass, liturgy, prayer services, meditations, adorations or other forms of organized worship? Please choose an answer. Please choose an answer. () Every day. () Almost every day. () At least once a week. (4) At least once a month. (5) Few times a year or less. (6) Do not attend at all. 46. How important is religion for you? The term "religion" is here taken as meaning the relationship with God. Please evaluate the statement on a scale of 8. () Is completely insignificant. () Is rather unimportant. () Is important but not decisive. (4) Is equally important with the other factors. (5) Is slightly more important than the other factors. (6) Is, for me, among the most important factors. (7) Is, for me, one of the most essential factors. (8) Is the most important factor for me.

4 47. Other than at church services, how often do you pray? () than once a day. () Almost every day. () At least once a week. (4) At least once a month. (5) Few times a year or less. (6) I do not pray at all. (7) I prefer not to answer to this question. 48. How often do you read the Scriptures? Please choose an answer. () Every day. () Almost every day. () At least once a week. (4) At least once a month. (5) Few times a year or less. (6) I do not read the Scriptures at all. (8) I prefer not to answer to this question. 49. Do you belong to a parish or congregation? 5. Which church/denomination do you belong? 5. What is your age? 5. What is your nationality? 5. Are you male or female? 54. Is there anything else that you consider important to add?

4 Appendix 7 Questionnaire for Performers and Experts of Gregorian chant in Estonian Küsimustik gregooriuse laulu esitajateleja ekspertidele Sissejuhatus Kallis [Respondent] Suur tänu Teile käesolevas projektis osalemise eest. Teie ainukordne ja isiklik panus on väga kõrgelt hinnatav ja uurimus poleks võimalik ilma Teieta. Märkimisväärne arv gregooriuse laulu esitajaid ja eksperte üle kogu maailma osaleb selles projektis ja ma olen veendunud, et see annab huvitavaid vastuseid gregooriuse laulu esitamisaspektide kohta. Gregooriuse laul omab lääne muusikakultuuris asendamatut rolli ja selle igakülgne uurimine on äärmiselt vajalik. Ainult teie, gregooriuse laulu esitamisega ja uurimisega kokku puutuvad inimesed, saate selle uurimuse kordamineku tagada! Küsimustiku näol on tegemist rahvusvahelise uuringuga, mis teadaolevalt on selles valdkonnas esmakordne ja annab unikaalse võimaluse gregooriuse laulu esitusaspektide uurimiseks. Seda olulisem on küsitluse kordaminekuks Teie ekspertarvamus. Küsitluse eesmärgiks on uurida gregooriuse laulu kaasaegsed esitusstiile, nende kujunemist ja eripärasid. Ehki küsitluse läbiviijale on Teie isik teada, on küsitluse tulemused täiesti konfidentsiaalsed ja anonüümsed. Erandina palun Teie luba seostada Teie vastuseid Teie isikuga ainult ühes punktis küsimustes, mis puudutavad Teie õpetajaid ja eeskujusid gregooriuse laulus. See on vajalik nn gregooriuse laulu esitajate "sugupuu" koostamiseks. Gregooriuse laulu mõiste käesolevas küsitluses on üldistav ja kõikehõlmav, tähendades nii keskaegse Lääne kiriku erinevate liturgiliste perekondade repertuaari kui nende kaasaegseid reflektsioone trükis ning esituses. Küsimused ilmuvad Teie kuvarile ühekaupa. Kui olete küsimusele vastanud, kuvatakse automaatselt uus küsimus. Mitmed küsimused paluvad hinnata teatud väiteid skaalal. Hõlbustamiseks on skaala väärtused autori poolt välja kirjutatud ja kuvatakse koos iga alaküsimusega. Pidage vastamisel silmas, et Teilt oodatakse täiesti subjektiivset arvamust, mitte üldlevinud väljakujunenud seisukohta. Mõned küsimused võivad tunduda

44 Teile omavahel sarnsed see ei ole mitte eesmärgil Teid ristküsitleda. Ka kõige sarnasematena tunduvatel küsimustel on alati oma personaalne lähenemisnurk ja sooviksin väga Teie arvamust selle kohta teada saada. Te võite küsimustikule vastamise ajutiselt katkestada klikkides vastavatele lingile ekraanil. Jätkatamiseks tuleb Teil uuesti siseneda küsimustikku Teile e postiga saadetud lingi abil. Kui Te soovite oma vastuseid parandada või muuta, siis selleks on Teil võimalus küsimustiku lõpus. Käesolevale küsitlusele vastamine võtab aega umbes 6 minutit. Küsitlus on spetsiifilist laadi ja üsna põhjalik ning võib nõuda Teilt keskendumist. Teie arvamus on uuringu seisukohast asendamatult oluline ja seetõttu loodan, et leiate võimaluse küsimustikule põhjalikult vastata. Kui Teil on käesoleva uurimuse kohta küsimusi, palun kirjutage mulle aadressil eerik@ekn.ee. Tänan Teid veelkord kogu südamest Teie vastutuleku ja koostöö eest. [Küsimused:].. Mida tähendab Teie jaoks gregooriuse laul? (nii mõiste kui nähtusena) Palun hinnake järgmist väidet skaalal 8. () Ei tähenda seda mitte mingil juhul. () Tähendus suhteliselt ebaoluline. () Tähendab natuke, aga mitte määravalt. (4) Tähendab mõnevõrra. (5) Tähendab üsna palju. (6) On minu jaoks väga oluliste tähenduste hulgas. (7) On üks olulisemaid tähendusi. (8) Tähendab eelkõige seda on kõige olulisem.. Gregooriuse laul tähendab minu jaoks eluviisi.. Gregooriuse laul tähendab minu jaoks Euroopa professionaalse muusikakultuuri alusmüüri.

45. Gregooriuse laul tähendab minu jaoks frangi rooma laulu ühte osa kogu ladinakeelsest sakralsest monoodiast. 4. Gregooriuse laul tähendab minu jaoks põnevat repertuaari, millega sisustada kontsertprogramme. 5. Gregooriuse laul tähendab minu jaoks igasugust ühehäälset ladinakeelset liturgilist laulu. 6. Gregooriuse laul tähendab minu jaoks ilusaid meloodiad. 7. Gregooriuse laul tähendab minu jaoks inspiratsiooni minu muusikaliseks tegevuseks. 8. Gregooriuse laul tähendab minu jaoks karjääritegemise võimalust. 9. Gregooriuse laul tähendab minu jaoks Rooma katoliku kiriku liturgilist muusikat.. Gregooriuse laul tähendab minu jaoks keskaegse notatsiooni uurimise võimalust.. Gregooriuse laul tähendab minu jaoks kindlate reeglite järgi interpreteeritud ladinakeelset liturgilist laulu.. Gregooriuse laul tähendab minu jaoks kogumit keskaegsetest käsikirjadest ja liturgilistest tekstidest.. Gregooriuse laul tähendab minu jaoks laiapõhjalist muusikateaduslikku ja liturgikaalast valdkonda. 4. Gregooriuse laul tähendab minu jaoks meetodit liturgilise muusika kirjutamiseks. 5. Gregooriuse laul tähendab minu jaoks muusikaga illumineeritud sakraalset teksti. 6. Gregooriuse laul tähendab minu jaoks muusikalist mõtteviisi. 7. Gregooriuse laul tähendab minu jaoks näitemänguliselt esitatud muusikalist teksti. 8. Gregooriuse laul tähendab minu jaoks palvet. 9. Gregooriuse laul tähendab minu jaoks rooma riitusega Lääne kiriku keskaegset ühehäälset liturgilist laulu.. Gregooriuse laul tähendab minu jaoks silda eelkristlike kultuuride ja vaimsustega.. Gregooriuse laul tähendab minu jaoks temaatiliselt sidusat ja tekstuaalselt terviklikku repertuaari terveks kirikuaastaks.. Gregooriuse laul tähendab minu jaoks tähendusrikkaid tekste.. Gregooriuse laul tähendab minu jaoks võimalust tutvustada huvitavat muusikat ja seda kandvat vaimsust publikule. 4. Gregooriuse laul tähendab minu jaoks õpetust Jumala Sõnast ja sellest mida see väljendab.

46 5. Gregooriuse laul tähendab minu jaoks ühte osa minu muusikalisest tegevusest. 6. Gregooriuse laul tähendab minu jaoks ühte vokaalrepertuaari paljude teiste hulgas. 7. Gregooriuse laul tähendab minu jaoks tüütut kohustust, millega peab rutiinselt tegelema. Kui Teie meelest mõni tähendus puudub, palun lisage see ning hinnake seda skaalal 8. 8.. Gregooriuse laul tähendab minu jaoks.... 4. Palun nimetage tähtsuse järjekorras kuni Teie jaoks tähtsaimat võtmeisikut gregooriuse laulu valdkonnas läbi kõigi aegade, näiteks lauljad, muusikateadlased, vaimulikud, kirikupoliitikud. 4. 74. Mis on Teie meelest gregooriuse laulu heaks esitamiseks oluline? Palun hinnake järgmist väidet skaalal 8. () Ei ole mitte mingil juhul gregooriuse laulu heaks esitamiseks oluline. () On hea esitamise seisukohast suhteliselt ebaoluline. () On heaks esitamiseks kasuks, aga mitte määravalt. (4) On soovitav, aga mitte ilmtingimata hädavajalik. (5) On piisavalt oluline, et selle poole püüelda, aga ületähtsustada ei tohi. (6) On nii oluline, et iga esitaja peaks kõigest väest selle poole püüdlema. (7) On üks olulisemaid aspekte gregooriuse laulu heaks esitamiseks. (8) On nii oluline, et ilma selleta ei saa gregooriuse laulu hästi esitada. 4. Agoogiline mitmekesisus (fraseerimisest tulenevad tempokõikumised). 4. Väga hea artikulatsioon. 44. Dünaamiline mitmekesisus. 45. Muusikaline fraseerimine. 46. Väga hea diktsioon. 47. Väga hea vokaalne kvaliteet. 48. Isiklik panus teksti lahtimõtestamisel. 49. Lauldava repertuaari ajaloolise tausta teadmine. 5. Isikupärane muusikaline lähenemine.

47 5. Laadi iseärasuste jälgimine. 5. Ladina keele oskus sõnadest arusaamise tasemel. 5. Laulja usk sellesse teksti, mida ta laulab. 54. Laulja üldine musikaalsus. 55. Liturgiline keskkond. 56. Oma õpetaja jäljendamine. 57. Peast laulmine. 58. Püüe esitada muusikat võimalikult originaalilähedaselt. 59. Religioosne intensioon. 6. Retooriline lähenemine esitatavale muusikale. 6. Rutiinse laulmise vältimine. 6. Semioloogiline täpsus. 6. Sobiv esinemisriietus. 64. Sobiv ruum. 65. Tekstuaalne narratiiv. 66. Teoreetilised teadmised paleograafias. 67. Teoreetilised teadmised semioloogias. 68. Väga täpne intonatsioon. 69. Õige esitusstiili järgimine. 7. Arusaamine sellest, millest tekst räägib ja mida see tähendab. 7. Hingestatud esitus. Kui Teie meelest mõni aspekt puudub, palun lisage see ning hinnake seda skaalal 8. 7. 74. Minu jaoks on gregooriuse laulu heaks esitamiseks oluline... 75. 84. Palun nimetage tähtsuse järjekorras kuni Teie jaoks tähtsaimat võtmeisikut gregooriuse laulu valdkonnas alates 9. sajandi algusest, näiteks lauljad, muusikateadlased, vaimulikud, kirikupoliitikud. Nimed, mis esinesid esimeses nimekirjas võivad korduda.

48 85. Mida tähendab Teie jaoks muusika ja teksti suhe gregooriuse laulus? Palun hinnake järgmist väidet skaalal 8. () Ei tähenda seda mitte mingil juhul. () Tähendus suhteliselt ebaoluline. () Tähendab natuke, aga mitte määravalt. (4) Tähendab mõnevõrra. (5) Tähendab üsna palju. (6) On minu jaoks väga oluliste tähenduste hulgas. (7) On üks olulisemaid tähendusi. (8) Tähendab eelkõige seda on kõige olulisem. 85. Muusika ja tekst on küll erinevad kooslused, aga nad eksisteerivad tervikuna koos, teineteist täiendades. 86. Muusika ja tekst on lahutamatud ehk nad kuuluvad absoluutselt kokku. 87. Muusika on ainult vahendiks teksti edasiandmisel ehk tekst on iseseisev ja muusika ainult aitab seda väljendada. 88. Muusika on teksti heliline ümbersõnastus (parafraas) ehk teksti mõte sisaldub muusikas ka ilma sõnadeta. 89. Tekst ja muusika on sama palju seotud kui iga teise vokaalrepertuaari puhul. 9. Muusika sisaldub teksti intonatsioonis ja on võimendatult välja toodud. 9. Muusika ja tekst on erinevad kooslused, aga nad on teineteisega kokku sobitatud. 9. Muusika on teksti külge vägivaldselt poogitud ja elab teksti kulul. 9. Tekst räägib sellest, millest muusika jutustab. 94. 95. Kui Teie meelest mõni muusika ja teksti suhe puudub, palun lisage see ning hinnake seda skaalal 8. 96. Kui Teie meelest läheb teksti ja muusika loogika gregooriuse laulus lahku, kumba Te järgite? Palun valige üks variant. () Eelkõige teksti loogikat. () Eelkõige muusika loogikat.

49 () Vahel teksti, vahel muusika loogikat. (4) Teksti ja muusika loogika ei lähe minu meelest gregooriuse laulus kunagi lahku. 97. 6. Kui täpselt on Teie meelest võimalik meie käsutuses oleva informatsiooni põhjal taastada Einsiedelni ja St Galleni piirkonna keskaegse gregooriuse laulu ajalooloselt autentset esituslaadi erinevate sajandite lõikes? (7. 6. saj) 97. 7. saj 98. 8. saj 99. 9. saj.. saj.. saj.. saj.. saj 4. 4. saj 5. 5. saj 6. 6. saj 7.. Mitmed interpreedid peavad gregooriuse laulu esitamise juures oluliseks autentsust. Mida autentsus Teie jaoks tähendab? 7. Laulmist täpselt nõnda nagu seda tehti lauldava repertuaari loomise ajastul. 8. Laulmist nõnda, et muusika kõlaks esitamise hetkel sisuliselt ehtsalt. 9. Laulmist nõnda, et see sobituks konteksti, milles seda parasjagu esitatakse.. Milline on Teie muusikaline haridus? Palun valige üks variant. () Mul ei ole muusikalist eriharidust. () Mul on muusikaline algharidus. () Mul on muusikaline kõrgharidus. (4) Mul on teaduslik kraad muusikas. Kui jah siis milline ja kust ülikoolist?

44. Mis aastal Te alustasite gegooriuse lauluga tegelemist?. Palun nimetage kronoloogilises järjekorras, kus Te olete gregooriuse laulu õppinud (koolid, ansamblid, meistrikursused)?. Kes on olnud Teie õpetajad gregooriuse laulu esitamisel? 4. Kes lisaks Teie õpetajatele on kujundanud Teie gregooriuse laulu interpretatsiooni stiili ja olnud Teile eeskujuks? 5. Mis veel on kujundanud Teie gregooriuse laulu interpretatsiooni? 6. Milliseid allikaid (nii keskaegseid kui kaasaegseid) Te oma gregooriuse laulu alases tegevuses (interpretatsioon, teadustegevus) kasutate? 7. 9. Kui Te saaksite ajas tagasi minna 7 ks minutiks, et uurida gregooriuse laulu esitamist, siis kuhu Te läheksite ja mida Te teeksite? 7. Ma läheksin tagasi aastasse 8. Ma läheksin paika nimega 9. Ma veedaksin oma 7 minutit. Palun vaadake graduaallaulu Haec dies kahte esimest sõna. Kui Te seda laulu esitate, siis milliseid noote nende sõnade jooksul Te kujutate endale ette võrdse pikkusega nootidena. Palun moodustage nendest nootidest kuni 4 gruppi, märkides ära Teie meelest võrdse pikkusega noodid. Näiteks 'noodid 4 ja 5 on võrdse pikkusega' või 'noodid, 4, 5, ja on võrdse pikkusega'.. Kui me laulame, toome kuuldavale erineva kestvusega helisid. Heli kestvus muusikas võib suureneda kui tema vältust pikendatakse või esitamise tempot aeglustatakse. Kui Te gregooriuse laulu esitamisel peate teatud heli kestvust suurendama, kas Te pikendate noodi vältust või aeglustate tempot?

44 () Pikendan noodi vältust. () Aeglustan tempot. () Fraasi keskel pikendan nooti, fraasi lõpus aeglustan tempot. (4) Kuidas kunagi. (5) Soovin kirjeldada oma sõnadega.. 7. Palun nimetage tähtsuse järjekorras kuni 5 Teie meelest tähtsaimat sündmust gregooriuse laulu valdkonnas läbi kõigi aegade (nt kirikukogude otsused, isikute tegevus, käsikirjade sünnid või nende taasavastamised, teaduslikud avastused). 7. Kas te esinete rohkem kontserdil või jumalateenistusel? Palun valige üks variant. () Rohkem kontserdil. () Rohkem jumalateenistusel. () Enamvähem võrdselt. 8. Kas laulmine salvestuse tegemiseks on väljaspool salvestus spetsiifilisi aspekte Teie jaoks tavalisest laulmisest erinev? Palun valige üks variant. () Jah. () Ei. 9. Mida Te salvestusel lauldes teisiti teete? Palun kirjeldage oma sõnadega.. Kui tihti te tegelete gregooriuse lauluga? (laulmine, juhatatamine, teadustöö) Palun valige üks variant. () Mitmel korral päevas. () Pea iga päev. () Vähemalt korra nädalas. (4) Vähemalt korra kuus. (5) Mõne korra aastas või harvem.

44. Kas Te laulate/juhatate ka muud repertuaari peale gregooriuse laulu? Palun valige üks variant. () Jah. () Ei.. Millist repertuaari Te peale gregooriuse laulu esitate või uurite?. 8. Palun nimetage kronoloogilises järjekorras, millistes gregooriuse laulu praktiseerivates ansamblites Te olete osalenud? 9. 4 Palun nimetage tähtsuse järjekorras kuni 5 Teie meelest tähtsaimat teaduslikku avastust gregooriuse laulu valdkonnas alates 9. sajandi algusest. 44. Kui Te peaksite kolme lausega seletama, millel põhineb Teie gegooriuse laulu interpretatsioon, siis kuidas Te seda teeksite? 45. Kui tihi Te käite jumalateenistustel? Jumalateenistuse all mõistetakse missat, liturgiat, palvust, hardushetke ja muid organiseeritud jumalateenistuslikke vorme. Palun valige üks variant. () Iga päev () Pea iga päev. () Vähemalt korra nädalas. (4) Vähemalt korra kuus. (5) Mõne korra aastas või harvem. (6) Ei käi üldse. 46. Kui oluline on Teie jaoks religioon?religiooni all mõistetakse siinkohal suhet Jumalaga. Palun hinnake järgmist väidet skaalal 8. () Täiesti ebaoluline. () Kõrvalise tähtsusega, suhteliselt ebaoluline. () Oluline, aga mitte määravalt.

44 (4) Võrdselt oluline kõige muuga. (5) Kõigest muust veidi olulisem. (6) On minu jaoks väga oluliste asjade hulgas. (7) On minu jaoks üks olulisimaid asju. (8) On minu jaoks kõige olulisem asi. 47. Kui tihti Te palvetate lisaks jumalateenistustele? Palun valige üks variant. () Üle ühe korra päevas. () Pea iga päev. () Vähemalt korra nädalas. (4) Vähemalt korra kuus. (5) Mõne korra aastas või harvem. (6) Ei palveta üldse. (7) Ma eelistan sellele küsimusele mitte vastata. 48. Kui tihti Te loete Piiblit? Palun valige üks variant. () Iga päev. () Pea iga päev. () Vähemalt korra nädalas. (4) Vähemalt korra kuus. (5) Mõne korra aastas või harvem. (6) Ei loe üldse. (7) Ma eelistan sellele küsimusele mitte vastata. 49. Kas Te kuulute mõnda kogudusse? Palun valige üks variant. () Jah. () Ei. 5. Millisesse kogudusse/denominatsiooni Te kuulute?

444 5. Mis on Teie vanus? 5. Mis on Teie rahvus? 5. Kas Te olete mees või naine? 54. Kas te soovite veel midagi lisada?

445 Appendix 8 The printed version of the Questionnaire for Performers and Experts of Gregorian chant in English (A5) This appendix is situated in the pocket on the back cover of this volume (volume ).

446 Appendix 9 Tables 9 (TOA) The raw data of the results of some quantitative questions has already been presented in the chapter Observations on the results of the questionnaire. Some of these results are not repeated in this appendix. Raw data of the results of questionnaire in the form of frequency tables Valid Table 9 (TOA) Q. Gregorian chant, for me, means a way of life. Freq % Valid % (In no way means that.) 7.9 7.9 (Essentially does not mean that.) 4.. (Means that to a small extent but not significantly.) 9 7. 7. 4 (Means that to a certain extent.) 9 5. 5. 5 (Means that to a moderate extent.) 6.6.6 6 (Means that to a great extent, belonging in fact to the essential meanings.) 5 7.6 7.6 7 (Is one of the most essential meanings.) 4 8.9 8.9 8 (Is the primary meaning, the most essential, for me.) 7.9 7.9 Total 7.. Table 9 (TOA) Q. Gregorian chant, for me, means the foundation of European professional musical culture. Freq % Valid % Valid (In no way means that.) 6 4.7 4.7 (Essentially does not mean that.).6.6 (Means that to a small extent but not significantly.).4.4 4 (Means that to a certain extent.) 7.9 7.9 5 (Means that to a moderate extent.) 7.9 7.9 6 (Means that to a great extent, belonging in fact to the essential meanings.) 5. 5. 7 (Is one of the most essential meanings.) 5. 5. 8 (Is the primary meaning, the most essential, for me.) 5. 5. Total 7.. Valid Table 94 (TOA) Q. Gregorian chant, for me, means Franco Roman chant, a part of Latin sacred monody. Freq % Valid % (In no way means that.).6.6 (Essentially does not mean that.).4.4 (Means that to a small extent but not significantly.) 7.9 7.9 4 (Means that to a certain extent.) 9 7. 7. 5 (Means that to a moderate extent.) 8 4. 4. 6 (Means that to a great extent, belonging in fact to the essential meanings.) 5.7 5.7 7 (Is one of the most essential meanings.) 9.8.8 8 (Is the primary meaning, the most essential, for me.) 6 8. 8. Total 7.. Table 95 (TOA) Q4. Gregorian chant, for me, means exciting repertory that can be used to fill concert programs. Freq % Valid % Valid (In no way means that.) 8. 8. (Essentially does not mean that.) 8 4. 4. (Means that to a small extent but not significantly.) 7.. 4 (Means that to a certain extent.) 6.6.6 5 (Means that to a moderate extent.) 7.4.4 6 (Means that to a great extent, belonging in fact to the essential meanings.) 9.4 9.4 7 (Is one of the most essential meanings.) 7 5.5 5.5 8 (Is the primary meaning, the most essential, for me.) 7 5.5 5.5 Total 7..

447 Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Table 96 (TOA) Q5. Gregorian chant, for me, means any kind of monodic Latin liturgical chant. Freq % Valid % (In no way means that.) 4.4 4.4 (Essentially does not mean that.) 7. 7. (Means that to a small extent but not significantly.) 9.4 9.4 4 (Means that to a certain extent.) 9 5. 5. 5 (Means that to a moderate extent.) 7.9 7.9 6 (Means that to a great extent, belonging in fact to the essential meanings.) 7.9 7.9 7 (Is one of the most essential meanings.) 9.4 9.4 8 (Is the primary meaning, the most essential, for me.) 8.7 8.7 Total 7.. Table 97 (TOA) Q6. Gregorian chant, for me, means beautiful melodies. Freq % Valid % (In no way means that.) 5.9.9 (Essentially does not mean that.) 9.4 9.4 (Means that to a small extent but not significantly.) 5.8.8 4 (Means that to a certain extent.) 5.7 5.7 5 (Means that to a moderate extent.) 7.4.4 6 (Means that to a great extent, belonging in fact to the essential meanings.) 6.5 6.5 7 (Is one of the most essential meanings.) 8. 8. 8 (Is the primary meaning, the most essential, for me.) 4.. Total 7.. Table 98 (TOA) Q7. Gregorian chant, for me, means inspiration for my musical activities. Freq % Valid % (In no way means that.) 6 4.7 4.7 (Essentially does not mean that.) 8 6. 6. (Means that to a small extent but not significantly.) 7 5.5 5.5 4 (Means that to a certain extent.) 5.7 5.7 5 (Means that to a moderate extent.) 7.4.4 6 (Means that to a great extent, belonging in fact to the essential meanings.) 5 9.7 9.7 7 (Is one of the most essential meanings.).6.6 8 (Is the primary meaning, the most essential, for me.) 4.. Total 7.. Table 99 (TOA) Q8. Gregorian chant, for me, means an opportunity for career enhancement. Freq % Valid % (In no way means that.) 64 5.4 5.4 (Essentially does not mean that.) 8 4. 4. (Means that to a small extent but not significantly.) 9.4 9.4 4 (Means that to a certain extent.) 8.7 8.7 5 (Means that to a moderate extent.) 8 6. 6. 6 (Means that to a great extent, belonging in fact to the essential meanings.) 7 5.5 5.5 7 (Is one of the most essential meanings.).6.6 8 (Is the primary meaning, the most essential, for me.) 5.9.9 Total 7.. Table (TOA) Q9. Gregorian chant, for me, means Roman Catholic liturgical music. Freq % Valid % (In no way means that.).4.4 (Essentially does not mean that.) 8 6. 6. (Means that to a small extent but not significantly.) 7.9 7.9 4 (Means that to a certain extent.) 8 6. 6. 5 (Means that to a moderate extent.).. 6 (Means that to a great extent, belonging in fact to the essential meanings.) 9 5. 5. 7 (Is one of the most essential meanings.) 6.5 6.5 8 (Is the primary meaning, the most essential, for me.) 45 5.4 5.4 Total 7..

448 Valid Table (TOA) Q. Gregorian chant, for me, means an opportunity to investigate mediaeval notation. Freq % Valid % (In no way means that.) 9 7. 7. (Essentially does not mean that.) 6.6.6 (Means that to a small extent but not significantly.).. 4 (Means that to a certain extent.) 4 8.9 8.9 5 (Means that to a moderate extent.).6.6 6 (Means that to a great extent, belonging in fact to the essential meanings.) 4.. 7 (Is one of the most essential meanings.).. 8 (Is the primary meaning, the most essential, for me.) 8 6. 6. Total 7.. Table (TOA) Q. Gregorian chant, for me, means liturgical song, to be interpreted according to certain rules. Freq % Valid % Valid (In no way means that.).4.4 (Essentially does not mean that.) 9 7. 7. (Means that to a small extent but not significantly.) 8 6. 6. 4 (Means that to a certain extent.) 6.5 6.5 5 (Means that to a moderate extent.) 9 5. 5. 6 (Means that to a great extent, belonging in fact to the essential meanings.) 6.5 6.5 7 (Is one of the most essential meanings.) 8.. 8 (Is the primary meaning, the most essential, for me.) 8 4. 4. Total 7.. Table (TOA) Q. Gregorian chant, for me, means a collection of mediaeval manuscripts and liturgical texts. Freq % Valid % Valid (In no way means that.) 7.9 7.9 (Essentially does not mean that.) 9 7. 7. (Means that to a small extent but not significantly.) 7. 7.5 4 (Means that to a certain extent.) 8. 8. 5 (Means that to a moderate extent.) 6.5.6 6 (Means that to a great extent, belonging in fact to the essential meanings.) 6.5 6.7 7 (Is one of the most essential meanings.) 8.7 8.7 8 (Is the primary meaning, the most essential, for me.) 4.. Total 6 99.. Missing System.8 Total 7. Table 4 (TOA) Q. Gregorian chant, for me, means a broad based domain of musicology and liturgics. Freq % Valid % Valid (In no way means that.) 6 4.7 4.8 (Essentially does not mean that.) 7 5.5 5.6 (Means that to a small extent but not significantly.) 6.6.7 4 (Means that to a certain extent.) 5.7 5.9 5 (Means that to a moderate extent.) 6.5.6 6 (Means that to a great extent, belonging in fact to the essential meanings.) 5 9.7 9.8 7 (Is one of the most essential meanings.) 8 4. 4. 8 (Is the primary meaning, the most essential, for me.) 8 6. 6. Total 6 99.. Missing System.8 Total 7.

449 Table 5 (TOA) Q4. Gregorian chant, for me, means a method of composing liturgical music. Freq % Valid % Valid (In no way means that.) 8. 8. (Essentially does not mean that.) 8. 8. (Means that to a small extent but not significantly.).. 4 (Means that to a certain extent.) 8 4. 4. 5 (Means that to a moderate extent.) 6.6.7 6 (Means that to a great extent, belonging in fact to the essential meanings.) 7.4.5 7 (Is one of the most essential meanings.) 8.7 8.7 8 (Is the primary meaning, the most essential, for me.) 5.9 4. Total 6 99.. Missing System.8 Total 7. Table 6 (TOA) Q5. Gregorian chant, for me, means sacred text, illuminated by music. Freq % Valid % Valid (In no way means that.).4.4 (Essentially does not mean that.).4.4 (Means that to a small extent but not significantly.) 4.. 4 (Means that to a certain extent.) 6.6.7 5 (Means that to a moderate extent.) 9 7. 7. 6 (Means that to a great extent, belonging in fact to the essential meanings.) 5.7 5.9 7 (Is one of the most essential meanings.) 4.4 4.6 8 (Is the primary meaning, the most essential, for me.) 4.5.7 Total 6 99.. Missing System.8 Total 7. Table 7 (TOA) Q6. Gregorian chant, for me, means a way of musical thinking. Freq % Valid % Valid (In no way means that.) 5.9 4. (Essentially does not mean that.) 7.9 7.9 (Means that to a small extent but not significantly.) 7 5.5 5.6 4 (Means that to a certain extent.) 9.4 9.5 5 (Means that to a moderate extent.) 8 4. 4. 6 (Means that to a great extent, belonging in fact to the essential meanings.).6.8 7 (Is one of the most essential meanings.) 8.. 8 (Is the primary meaning, the most essential, for me.) 6.6.7 Total 6 99.. Missing System.8 Total 7. Table 8 (TOA) Q7. Gregorian chant, for me, means musical text, performed in a theatrical manner. Freq % Valid % Valid (In no way means that.) 66 5. 5.4 (Essentially does not mean that.) 5 7.6 7.8 (Means that to a small extent but not significantly.) 5.9 4. 4 (Means that to a certain extent.) 8 6. 6. 5 (Means that to a moderate extent.) 6 4.7 4.8 6 (Means that to a great extent, belonging in fact to the essential meanings.) 5.9 4. 7 (Is one of the most essential meanings.).8.8 Total 6 99.. Missing System.8 Total 7.

45 Table 9 (TOA) Q8. Gregorian chant, for me, means prayer. Freq % Valid % Valid (In no way means that.).4.4 (Essentially does not mean that.).8.8 (Means that to a small extent but not significantly.).6.6 4 (Means that to a certain extent.).4.4 5 (Means that to a moderate extent.) 6 4.7 4.8 6 (Means that to a great extent, belonging in fact to the essential meanings.) 9 7. 7. 7 (Is one of the most essential meanings.) 8. 8. 8 (Is the primary meaning, the most essential, for me.) 79 6. 6.7 Total 6 99.. Missing System.8 Total 7. Table (TOA) Q9. Gregorian chant, for me, means mediaeval monodic liturgical chant of the Western church based on the Roman rite. Freq % Valid % Valid (In no way means that.).6.6 (Essentially does not mean that.) 4.. (Means that to a small extent but not significantly.) 6 4.7 4.8 4 (Means that to a certain extent.)..4 5 (Means that to a moderate extent.)..4 6 (Means that to a great extent, belonging in fact to the essential meanings.) 7. 7.6 7 (Is one of the most essential meanings.) 5. 5.6 8 (Is the primary meaning, the most essential, for me.) 6. 6.4 Total 5 98.4. Missing System.6 Total 7. Table (TOA) Q. Gregorian chant, for me, means a bridge to Pre Christian cultures and spiritualities. Freq % Valid % Valid (In no way means that.) 5.7 6. (Essentially does not mean that.) 5.7 6. (Means that to a small extent but not significantly.) 8 4. 4.5 4 (Means that to a certain extent.) 6.5 6.9 5 (Means that to a moderate extent.) 6.6.9 6 (Means that to a great extent, belonging in fact to the essential meanings.)..5 7 (Is one of the most essential meanings.) 7.9 8. 8 (Is the primary meaning, the most essential, for me.) 6 4.7 4.8 Total 4 97.6. Missing System.4 Total 7. Table (TOA) Q. Gregorian chant, for me, means thematically coherent and textually complete repertory Freq % Valid % Valid (In no way means that.) 4.. (Essentially does not mean that.).8.8 (Means that to a small extent but not significantly.).4.4 4 (Means that to a certain extent.) 9.4 9.7 5 (Means that to a moderate extent.) 6.5 6.9 6 (Means that to a great extent, belonging in fact to the essential meanings.) 8 4. 4.5 7 (Is one of the most essential meanings.) 5 7.6 8. 8 (Is the primary meaning, the most essential, for me.).6 4. Total 4 97.6. Missing System.4 Total 7.

45 Table (TOA) Q. Gregorian chant, for me, means meaningful texts. Freq % Valid % Valid (In no way means that.).8.8 (Essentially does not mean that.).4.4 (Means that to a small extent but not significantly.) 7 5.5 5.6 4 (Means that to a certain extent.) 9 7. 7. 5 (Means that to a moderate extent.) 5 9.7. 6 (Means that to a great extent, belonging in fact to the essential meanings.) 8. 8.5 7 (Is one of the most essential meanings.) 5 7.6 8. 8 (Is the primary meaning, the most essential, for me.) 6.5 6.9 Total 4 97.6. Missing System.4 Total 7. Table 4 (TOA) Q. Gregorian chant, for me, means an opportunity to introduce interesting music and its underlying spirituality to the audience. Freq % Valid % Valid (In no way means that.) 8.7 8.9 (Essentially does not mean that.) 9 7. 7. (Means that to a small extent but not significantly.) 7.4.7 4 (Means that to a certain extent.)..5 5 (Means that to a moderate extent.) 6.5 6.9 6 (Means that to a great extent, belonging in fact to the essential meanings.) 5 9.7. 7 (Is one of the most essential meanings.) 9 5. 5. 8 (Is the primary meaning, the most essential, for me.) 9 7. 7. Total 4 97.6. Missing System.4 Total 7. Table 5 (TOA) Q4. Gregorian chant, for me, means a form of teaching about the Word of God and what the teaching expresses. Freq % Valid % Valid (In no way means that.) 5.9 4. (Essentially does not mean that.) 5.9 4. (Means that to a small extent but not significantly.) 7.9 8. 4 (Means that to a certain extent.) 7.9 8. 5 (Means that to a moderate extent.) 5.7 6. 6 (Means that to a great extent, belonging in fact to the essential meanings.) 6.5.8 7 (Is one of the most essential meanings.) 7..6 8 (Is the primary meaning, the most essential, for me.) 7. 7.6 Total 5 98.4. Missing System.6 Total 7. Table 6 (TOA) Q5. Gregorian chant, for me, means a part of my activities as musician. Freq % Valid % Valid (In no way means that.).6.6 (Essentially does not mean that.).4.4 (Means that to a small extent but not significantly.) 5.9 4. 4 (Means that to a certain extent.) 9 7. 7. 5 (Means that to a moderate extent.) 5.7 6. 6 (Means that to a great extent, belonging in fact to the essential meanings.).6 4. 7 (Is one of the most essential meanings.) 8..6 8 (Is the primary meaning, the most essential, for me.) 7..8 Total 4 97.6. Missing System.4 Total 7.

45 Table 7 (TOA) Q6. Gregorian chant, for me, means one vocal repertory among many others. Freq % Valid % Valid (In no way means that.) 7.9 8. (Essentially does not mean that.) 7. 7.7 (Means that to a small extent but not significantly.) 5.8. 4 (Means that to a certain extent.) 8. 8.5 5 (Means that to a moderate extent.) 9.4 9.7 6 (Means that to a great extent, belonging in fact to the essential meanings.) 6.5. 7 (Is one of the most essential meanings.) 8.7 8.9 8 (Is the primary meaning, the most essential, for me.) 5.9 4. Total 4 97.6. Missing System.4 Total 7. Table 8 (TOA) Q7. Gregorian chant, for me, means a boring duty that I need to do routinely. Freq % Valid % Valid (In no way means that.) 4 8.9 8.9 (Essentially does not mean that.) 8 6. 6.5 (Means that to a small extent but not significantly.) 5.9 4. 4 (Means that to a certain extent.).8.8 5 (Means that to a moderate extent.) 4.. 6 (Means that to a great extent, belonging in fact to the essential meanings.).8.8 8 (Is the primary meaning, the most essential, for me.).8.8 Total 4 97.6. Missing System.4 Total 7.

45 Q 4 Please name in the order of importance up to persons that, for you, appear as key figures in Gregorian chant through all the centuries, such as singers, musicologists, clergy, Church politicians. Table 9 (TOA) Q Freq % Valid % Valid *Abbey of La Pierre Qui Vire.8. *Abbey of Solesmes.8. *Medieval communities the members of which composed and copied chant 5.9 4.8 *The Roman Schola Cantorum.6.9 *The Second Vatican Council.8. Alcuin of York.8. Ambrose, saint, Bishop of Milan.8. André Mocquereau 4..8 Anicius Manlius Severinus Boethius.8. Augustine of Hippo, saint.6.9 Benedict of Nursia, saint.8. Charles the Great 5.9 4.8 Clément Morin.8. Constantine the Great.6.9 Daniel Saulnier.6.9 Eugéne Cardine 7.9 9.5 Godehard Joppich.6.9 Gregory I the Great, pope, saint 7.. Greta Mary Hair.8. Guido of Arezzo.6.9 Hartker, monk.6.9 Hildegard of Bingen.8. Holy Spirit.8. Hucbald of St Amand.8. Iegor Reznikoff.6.9 Jaan Eik Tulve.4.9 Jan Valkestijn.8. Jerome of Moravia.8. Jesus Christ.8. Joop Bergsma.8. Joseph Pothier.6.9 Louis Marie Vigne.8. Mary Berry.8. Nereu de Castro Teixeira.8. Pepin the Short.8. Pius X, pope, saint.6.9 Prosper Guéranger 7 5.5 6.7 Rebecca Stewart.8. Robert Anderson.8. Taivo Niitvägi.8. Toivo Tulev.6.9 Willi Apel.6.9 William Mahrt.8. Wim van Gerven.8. Total 5 8.7. Missing System 7. Total 7.

454 Table (TOA) Q Freq % Valid % Valid *Abbey of Santo Domingo de Silos.8. *Abbey of Solesmes.8. *Ensemble Sequentia.8. *Roman Catholic church.8. *The Roman Schola Cantorum.8. Alcuin of York.4. Ambrose, saint, Bishop of Milan.6. André Mocquereau 6 4.7 6. Anicius Manlius Severinus Boethius.8. Aurelian of Réome.8. Bernard Brockbernd.8. Bernard of Clairvaux, saint.6. Charles the Great 7 5.5 7.4 Chrodegang, saint, Bishop of Metz.8. Daniel Saulnier.8. David Hiley.8. Dominique Vellard.8. Eerik Jõks.8. Eleanor Florence Dewey, mother Marie du Redempteur.8. Eugéne Cardine 7.9.5 Francis Poulenc.8. Gregory I the Great, pope, saint 4. 4. Guido of Arezzo.8. Hartker, monk.6. Jaan Eik Tulve.8. Jaromir Cerny.8. Jean Claire.6. Johannes Berchmans Göschl.6. John Paul II, pope.8. Joseph Pothier 6 4.7 6. Kirsti Autio.8. Laurentia McLachlan, Dame.8. Louis Marie Vigne.8. Luigi Agustoni.8. Marcel Pérès.6. Marie Noel Colette.8. Martin Uhlenbrock.8. Mary Berry.8. Michael Hermesdorff.8. Notker Balbulus.6. Pacifico Guimaraes Filho.8. Paul VI, pope.8. Pepin the Short.8. Peter, the apostle, saint.8. Pius X, pope, saint.6. Prosper Guéranger 4. 4. Stanislovas Dobrovolskis.6. Stefan Klöckner.8. Thomas Aquinas, saint.6. Toivo Tulev.8. Werner Beheydt.8. Vitalianus, Pope.8. Total 95 74.8. Missing System 5. Total 7.

455 Table (TOA) Q4 Freq % Valid % Valid *Medieval communities the members of which composed and copied chant.6. *Ensemble Organum.8. *Musicology of the th century.8. Alcuin of York.4.4 Amalarius of Metz.8. Ambrose, saint, Bishop of Milan.6. André Mocquereau.6. Antonino Albarosa.8. Aurelian of Réome.8. Benedict of Aniane, saint.8. Benedict XVI, pope.8. Bonifacio Giacomo Baroffio.8. Charles the Great.6. Chrodegang, saint, Bishop of Metz.6. Daniel Saulnier.8. Dominique Vellard.4.4 Eugéne Cardine 8 6. 9. Frans Mariman.8. Godehard Joppich.6. Gregory I the Great, pope, saint.8. Gregory Murray.8. Guido of Arezzo.4.4 Hildegard of Bingen.8. Hrabanus Maurus Magnentius.8. Hucbald of St Amand.8. Isobel Woods Preece.8. Jaan Eik Tulve.6. Jan Boogaarts.8. Jean Claire.6. Johanna Korhonen.8. Joseph Gajard.4.4 Joseph Pothier 4. 4.5 Luigi Agustoni.8. Marcel Pérès.8. Maurice Durufle.8. Miikael Krumpans.8. Nico Wesseling.8. Paul III, pope.8. Paul Salamunovich.8. Peter Wagner.8. Pius X, pope, saint 6 4.7 6.7 Prosper Guéranger 7.9. Richard Crocker.8. Solange Corbin.8. Taivo Niitvägi.8. Toivo Tulev.8. William Mahrt.8. Wim van Gerven.8. *Celebraters of liturgy according to Eastern rite.8. Total 89 7.. Missing System 8 9.9 Total 7.

456 Table (TOA) Q5 Freq % Valid % Valid *Abbey of Solesmes.8.4 *Medieval communities the members of which composed and copied chant.8.4 *Monks of the Cluniac order.8.4 Alberto Turco.6.7 Alcuin of York.8.4 Ambrose, saint, Bishop of Milan.8.4 André Mocquereau 4. 5.4 Arnestus of Pardubice.8.4 Augustine of Hippo, saint.8.4 Aurelian of Réome.8.4 Barbara Thornton.8.4 Benedict of Nursia, saint.8.4 Charles the Great.4 4. Daniel Saulnier.8.4 David Hiley.8.4 Dominique Vellard.6.7 Eugeen Liven.8.4 Eugéne Cardine 5.9 6.8 Fred Schneyderberg.8.4 Godehard Joppich.8.4 Gregory Labus.8.4 Guillaume de Volpiano.8.4 Hartker, monk.8.4 Henri Delhougne.8.4 Henry Bremridge Briggs.8.4 Hildegard of Bingen.8.4 Hubert Dopf.8.4 Ian Koukouzelis.8.4 Ina Lohr.8.4 Jean Claire.6.7 Johannes Berchmans Göschl.6.7 Joseph Gajard.6.7 Joseph Pothier 4. 5.4 Julius III, pope.8.4 Kees Pouderoyen.8.4 Kenneth Levy.8.4 Marcel Pérès.4 4. Marcin Bornus Szczycinski.8.4 Marie Noel Colette.8.4 Meelis Tõns.8.4 Michael Stumpel.8.4 Notker Balbulus.8.4 Odo of Cluny, saint.6.7 Oliver Messien.8.4 Pius X, pope, saint.4 4. Plato (c. 47 c. 47 BC).8.4 Prosper Guéranger.4 4. Richard Crocker.8.4 Stephen II, pope.8.4 Taivo Niitvägi.8.4 Total 74 58.. Missing System 5 4.7 Total 7.

457 Table (TOA) Q6 Freq % Valid % Valid *Medieval communities the members of which composed and copied chant.8.7 *Ensemble Organum.8.7 Alcuin of York.8.7 Alessio Randon.8.7 André Mocquereau.6. Augustine of Hippo, saint.8.7 Benedict of Aniane, saint.8.7 Benedict of Nursia, saint.6. Carlo Hommel.8.7 Charles the Great.8.7 Claudian Mamertus.8.7 David Hiley.8.7 Dominique Vellard.4 5. Eugéne Cardine 5.9 8. Godehard Joppich.6. Gregor Baumhof.8.7 Guido of Arezzo.6. Hermannus Contractus.8.7 Hildegard of Bingen.8.7 Jaan Eik Tulve.8.7 Jacques Hourlier.8.7 James McKinnon.6. Jean Claire.8.7 Jean Langlais.8.7 Johannes Berchmans Göschl.8.7 Joseph Gajard.4 5. Joseph Pothier 4. 6.7 Jules Jeannin.8.7 Kees Pouderoyen.4 5. Leo I the Great, pope, saint (? 46).8.7 Luca Ricossa.8.7 Marcel Pérès.8.7 Michel Andrieu.8.7 Nicholas Sandon.8.7 Paul Salamunovich.8.7 Peter Wagner.6. Pius X, pope, saint.6. Prosper Guéranger.8.7 Theodore Marier.8.7 Walter Howard Frere.8.7 Total 6 47.. Missing System 67 5.8 Total 7.

458 Table 4 (TOA) Q7 Freq % Valid % Valid Alfons Kurris.8. Ambrose, saint, Bishop of Milan.8. Antoine Dechevrens.8. Bridget of Sweden, saint.8. Celestine, pope.8. Charles the Great.8. Charles Tournemire.8. Daniel Saulnier.8. David Hiley.6 4. Dominikus Johner.8. Dominique Vellard.8. Eugéne Cardine 4. 8. Godehard Joppich.4 6. Gregory I the Great, pope, saint.8. Gregory II, pope.8. Guido of Arezzo.8. Hucbald of St Amand.8. Jean Claire.4 6. Jean Jeanneteau, canon.8. Jerome of Moravia.8. John, the Archcantor of St Peter Rome mid 7th c..8. Joseph Gajard.8. Joseph Pothier.8. Justine Ward.8. Katarina Livljanič.8. Kees Pouderoyen.8. Kenneth Elliott.8. Louis Marie Vigne.8. Luigi Agustoni.8. Marcel Pérès.6 4. Notker Balbulus.8. Peter Wagner.8. Pius V, pope.8. Pius X, pope, saint.8. Prosper Guéranger.6 4. Rebecca Stewart.8. Robert Pozarski.8. Sylvain Dieudonné.8. Toivo Tulev.8. Total 49 8.6. Missing System 78 6.4 Total 7.

459 Table 5 (TOA) Q8 Freq % Valid % Valid *Abbey of Solesmes.8.6 Alberto Turco.8.6 Amalarius of Metz.8.6 André Mocquereau.4 7.9 Daniel Saulnier.8.6 David Hiley.8.6 Dominique Vellard.8.6 Edward Roesner.8.6 Eleanor Florence Dewey, mother Marie du Redempteur.8.6 Eugéne Cardine.4 7.9 Giovanni Pierluigi da Palestrina.8.6 Godehard Joppich.8.6 Gregory III, pope.8.6 Heinrich Rumphorst.8.6 Helisachar, abbot (8th 9th c.).8.6 Hermann Abert.8.6 Hermann der Lahme.8.6 Iegor Reznikoff.8.6 Jan van Biezen.8.6 Joseph Pothier.8.6 Jules Jeannin.8.6 Laszlo Dobszay.8.6 Lilian Langsepp.8.6 Luigi Agustoni.6 5. Marcel Pérès.8.6 Marcin Bornus Szczycinski.8.6 Marie Louise Egbers.8.6 Notker Balbulus.8.6 Pius X, pope, saint.8.6 Prosper Guéranger.8.6 Rupert Fischer.8.6 Ruth Steiner.8.6 Stefan Klöckner.8.6 Total 8 9.9. Missing System 89 7. Total 7.

46 Table 6 (TOA) Q9 Freq % Valid % Valid *Abbey of Solesmes.8. Alberto Turco.4 9.7 André Mocquereau.8. Antonino Albarosa.8. Benoit de Mallherbe.8. Charles the Great.6 6.5 Constantin Floros.8. Daniel Saulnier.8. David Sullivan.8. Gregory I the Great, pope, saint.8. Hartker, monk.8. Hildegard of Bingen.8. Ilkka Taitto.8. James McKinnon.8. Jean Claire.8. Johannes Berchmans Göschl.4 9.7 Joseph Gajard.8. Joseph Pothier.8. Kenneth Levy.8. Marcel Pérès.8. Notker Balbulus.8. Pius X, pope, saint.8. Prosper Guéranger.6 6.5 Sergius, pope.8. Willi Apel.8. Total 4.4. Missing System 96 75.6 Total 7.

46 Table 7 (TOA) Q4 Freq % Valid % Valid André Mocquereau.4.7 Benedikt Lautenbacher.8.6 Bonifacio Giacomo Baroffio.8.6 Daniel Saulnier.8.6 Eugéne Cardine.4.7 Godehard Joppich.8.6 Gregory II, pope.8.6 James McKinnon.8.6 Jean Jeanneteau, canon.8.6 Joseph Pothier.8.6 Kris van den Hauten.8.6 Lila Collamore.8.6 Luigi Agustoni.8.6 Lycourgos Angelopoulos.8.6 Matthias Kreuels.8.6 Michel Huglo.8.6 Peter Wagner.8.6 Pius IX, pope.8.6 Pius X, pope, saint.6 7. Pius XII, pope.8.6 Rupert Fischer.8.6 Walter Howard Frere.8.6 Wilfrid Stinissen.8.6 Total 8.. Missing System 99 78. Total 7. Table 8 (TOA) Q4 Freq % Valid % Valid *Community of Domenicans in Kracow.8.8 *Ensemble Enigma.8.8 André Mocquereau.8.8 Anselm Grun.8.8 Antonino Albarosa.8.8 Benedict XVI, pope.8.8 Constantin Floros.8.8 Dominique Vellard.8.8 Eugéne Cardine.8.8 Inga Behrendt.8.8 Jean Jeanneteau, canon.8.8 John Baldovin.8.8 Joseph Gajard.6 7.7 Kees Pouderoyen.6 7.7 Martin Gerbert.8.8 Mary Berry.8.8 Michael Bernhard.8.8 Michel Huglo.8.8 Mryriam Van den Hauten.8.8 Pepin the Short.8.8 Pius X, pope, saint.6 7.7 Robert Skeris.8.8 Stephan Harding.8.8 Total 6.5. Missing System 79.5 Total 7.

46 Q4 74 What do you consider important for a good performance of Gregorian chant? Table 9 (TOA) Q4 Agogic variety (subtle changes of tempo related to phrasing). Freq % Valid (Is in no way essential to a good performance of Gregorian chant.).8.9 (Is rather insignificant from the point of view of a good performance of Greg. chant.) 7 5.5 6. (Is a credit but not a decisive factor for a good performance.) 7.9 8.9 4 (Is recommendable but not mandatory.) 4..6 5 (Is sufficiently important to deserve a special emphasis but should not be overestimated.) 5.7 7.9 6 (Is recommendable that every performer makes serious efforts to achieve it.) 6.6 4. 7 (Is one of the most essential aspects for a good performance of Gregorian chant.).6 6.8 8 (Is completely indispensable for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 4 8.9.4 Total 88.. Missing System 5.8 Total 7. Valid % Table (TOA) Q4. Excellent articulation. Freq % Valid % Valid (Is rather insignificant from the point of view of a good performance of Greg. chant.).8.9 (Is a credit but not a decisive factor for a good performance.) 6 4.7 5.4 4 (Is recommendable but not mandatory.) 5.9 4.5 5 (Is sufficiently important to deserve a special emphasis but should not be overestimated.) 6.6 4.4 6 (Is recommendable that every performer makes serious efforts to achieve it.) 9.8 6. 7 (Is one of the most essential aspects for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 9.8 6. 8 (Is completely indispensable for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 5 9.7.5 Total 87.4. Missing System 6.6 Total 7. Table (TOA) Q44. Variety of dynamics. Freq % Valid % Valid (Is in no way essential to a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 5.9 4.5 (Is rather insignificant from the point of view of a good performance of Greg. chant.) 7.4 5. (Is a credit but not a decisive factor for a good performance.) 9.4.8 4 (Is recommendable but not mandatory.) 7 5.5 6. 5 (Is sufficiently important to deserve a special emphasis but should not be overestimated.) 9 5. 7. 6 (Is recommendable that every performer makes serious efforts to achieve it.) 6.5.4 7 (Is one of the most essential aspects for a good performance of Gregorian chant.)..7 8 (Is completely indispensable for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 9.4.8 Total 87.4. Missing System 6.6 Total 7. Table (TOA) Q45. Musical phrasing. Freq % Valid % Valid (Is rather insignificant from the point of view of a good performance of Greg. chant.).6.8 (Is a credit but not a decisive factor for a good performance.) 5.9 4.5 4 (Is recommendable but not mandatory.).4.7 5 (Is sufficiently important to deserve a special emphasis but should not be overestimated.)..8 6 (Is recommendable that every performer makes serious efforts to achieve it.) 6.5.6 7 (Is one of the most essential aspects for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 5 7.6.8 8 (Is completely indispensable for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 6.5.6 Total 86.6. Missing System 7.4 Total 7.

46 Table (TOA) Q46. Excellent diction. Freq % Valid % Valid (Is in no way essential to a good performance of Gregorian chant.).8.9 (Is rather insignificant from the point of view of a good performance of Greg. chant.).8.9 (Is a credit but not a decisive factor for a good performance.) 4..6 4 (Is recommendable but not mandatory.) 5.9 4.5 5 (Is sufficiently important to deserve a special emphasis but should not be overestimated.) 9 5. 7. 6 (Is recommendable that every performer makes serious efforts to achieve it.).6 7. 7 (Is one of the most essential aspects for a good performance of Gregorian chant.).6 7. 8 (Is completely indispensable for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 6.5 8.9 Total 87.4. Missing System 6.6 Total 7. Table 4 (TOA) Q47. Excellent vocal quality. Freq % Valid % Valid (Is rather insignificant from the point of view of a good performance of Greg. chant.).8.9 (Is a credit but not a decisive factor for a good performance.) 7 5.5 6. 4 (Is recommendable but not mandatory.) 5.7 8. 5 (Is sufficiently important to deserve a special emphasis but should not be overestimated.) 5.7 8. 6 (Is recommendable that every performer makes serious efforts to achieve it.) 4. 6.9 7 (Is one of the most essential aspects for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 8.7 9.9 8 (Is completely indispensable for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 8.7 9.9 Total 87.4. Missing System 6.6 Total 7. Table 5 (TOA) Q48. A personal contribution to the exegesis of text. Freq % Valid % Valid (Is in no way essential to a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 9 7. 8. (Is rather insignificant from the point of view of a good performance of Greg. chant.) 7 5.5 6. (Is a credit but not a decisive factor for a good performance.) 9.4.8 4 (Is recommendable but not mandatory.) 9 7. 8. 5 (Is sufficiently important to deserve a special emphasis but should not be overestimated.) 5.8.5 6 (Is recommendable that every performer makes serious efforts to achieve it.) 6.5.4 7 (Is one of the most essential aspects for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 6.6 4.4 8 (Is completely indispensable for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 7.4 5. Total 87.4. Missing System 6.6 Total 7.

TP PT In 464 PT 4 Table 6 (TOA) Q49. Knowledge of the historical background of the music that is performed.tp Freq % Valid % Valid.8.9 (Is in no way essential to a good performance of Gregorian chant.).6.8 (Is rather insignificant from the point of view of a good performance of Greg. chant.) 8 6. 7. (Is a credit but not a decisive factor for a good performance.) 8 4. 6.4 4 (Is recommendable but not mandatory.) 6.5.6 5 (Is sufficiently important to deserve a special emphasis but should not be overestimated.) 8 4. 6.4 6 (Is recommendable that every performer makes serious efforts to achieve it.) 6.5 9. 7 (Is one of the most essential aspects for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 8 6. 7. 8 (Is completely indispensable for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 8 6. 7. Total 86.6. Missing System 7.4 Total 7, Table 7 (TOA) Q5. An idiolectic (personal and original) approach to the music that is performed. Freq % Valid % Valid.8.9 (Is in no way essential to a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 8 4. 6.4 (Is rather insignificant from the point of view of a good performance of Greg. chant.) 4..7 (Is a credit but not a decisive factor for a good performance.) 8..9 4 (Is recommendable but not mandatory.) 5.8.6 5 (Is sufficiently important to deserve a special emphasis but should not be overestimated.) 9.4.9 6 (Is recommendable that every performer makes serious efforts to achieve it.) 9 5. 7. 7 (Is one of the most essential aspects for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 4..6 8 (Is completely indispensable for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 4..6 Total 86.6. Missing System 7.4 Total 7, Table 8 (TOA) Q5. Respecting the individualities of the 8 modes. Freq % Valid % Valid (Is in no way essential to a good performance of Gregorian chant.).4.7 (Is rather insignificant from the point of view of a good performance of Greg. chant.) 8 6. 7. (Is a credit but not a decisive factor for a good performance.) 8 6. 7. 4 (Is recommendable but not mandatory.) 8.7. 5 (Is sufficiently important to deserve a special emphasis but should not be overestimated.) 8..9 6 (Is recommendable that every performer makes serious efforts to achieve it.) 8..9 7 (Is one of the most essential aspects for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 8 4. 6.4 8 (Is completely indispensable for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 6.6 4.5 Total 86.6. Missing System 7.4 Total 7. 4 this table there is a difference compared to the tables that are used for analysis in the dissertation. A mistake was made during entering the data from the questionnaires on paper. Variable 6 that was left blank by the respondent was marked into the table as zero. Therefore, there is an additional row in the frequency table, the value of which is. This mistake does not change the results of the questionnaire significantly. The same remark applies to questions 5, 6, and 86.

465 Table 9 (TOA) Q5. Passive comprehension of the Latin language (on the level of understanding the Freq % Valid % Valid (Is in no way essential to a good performance of Gregorian chant.).8.9 (Is a credit but not a decisive factor for a good performance.).6.8 4 (Is recommendable but not mandatory.) 7 5.5 6.4 5 (Is sufficiently important to deserve a special emphasis but should not be overestimated.)..8 6 (Is recommendable that every performer makes serious efforts to achieve it.) 5. 9. 7 (Is one of the most essential aspects for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 5 9.7.7 8 (Is completely indispensable for a good performance of Gregorian chant.).6 7. Total 86.6. Missing System 7.4 Total 7. Table 4 (TOA) Q5. Singer s belief in the text that is performed. Freq % Valid % Valid (Is in no way essential to a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 7.9 9. (Is rather insignificant from the point of view of a good performance of Greg. chant.).4.7 (Is a credit but not a decisive factor for a good performance.) 8.7. 4 (Is recommendable but not mandatory.) 8.7. 5 (Is sufficiently important to deserve a special emphasis but should not be overestimated.) 9.4.9 6 (Is recommendable that every performer makes serious efforts to achieve it.) 6.5.6 7 (Is one of the most essential aspects for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 9.4.9 8 (Is completely indispensable for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 5 9.7.7 Total 86.6. Missing System 7.4 Total 7. Table 4 (TOA) Q54. General musicality of the performer. Freq % Valid % Valid (Is in no way essential to a good performance of Gregorian chant.).8.9 (Is rather insignificant from the point of view of a good performance of Greg. chant.).8.9 (Is a credit but not a decisive factor for a good performance.) 5.9 4.5 4 (Is recommendable but not mandatory.) 8 6. 7. 5 (Is sufficiently important to deserve a special emphasis but should not be overestimated.) 5.8.6 6 (Is recommendable that every performer makes serious efforts to achieve it.) 7 9..6 7 (Is one of the most essential aspects for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 5. 9. 8 (Is completely indispensable for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 8.7. Total 86.6. Missing System 7.4 Total 7. Table 4 (TOA) Q55. Liturgical environment. Freq % Valid % Valid (Is in no way essential to a good performance of Gregorian chant.).4.7 (Is rather insignificant from the point of view of a good performance of Greg. chant.) 5.9 4.5 (Is a credit but not a decisive factor for a good performance.) 8.7. 4 (Is recommendable but not mandatory.) 5.8.6 5 (Is sufficiently important to deserve a special emphasis but should not be overestimated.) 7.9 9. 6 (Is recommendable that every performer makes serious efforts to achieve it.) 4..7 7 (Is one of the most essential aspects for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 7 9..6 8 (Is completely indispensable for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 5.8.6 Total 86.6. Missing System 7.4 Total 7.

466 Table 4 (TOA) Q56. Imitation of one s teacher. Freq % Valid % Valid (Is in no way essential to a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 9 5. 7. (Is rather insignificant from the point of view of a good performance of Greg. chant.) 6.5 9. (Is a credit but not a decisive factor for a good performance.) 9 5. 7. 4 (Is recommendable but not mandatory.) 4..7 5 (Is sufficiently important to deserve a special emphasis but should not be overestimated.) 7.4 5.5 6 (Is recommendable that every performer makes serious efforts to achieve it.) 8.7. 7 (Is one of the most essential aspects for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 9 7. 8. Total 86.6. Missing System 7.4 Total 7. Table 44 (TOA) Q57. Singing from memory. Freq % Valid % Valid (Is in no way essential to a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 7.9 9. (Is rather insignificant from the point of view of a good performance of Greg. chant.) 5.9 4.5 (Is a credit but not a decisive factor for a good performance.) 5 9.7.5 4 (Is recommendable but not mandatory.) 5.7 8. 5 (Is sufficiently important to deserve a special emphasis but should not be overestimated.) 6.6 4.4 6 (Is recommendable that every performer makes serious efforts to achieve it.) 7. 9.8 7 (Is one of the most essential aspects for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 6 4.7 5.4 8 (Is completely indispensable for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 7 5.5 6. Total 87.4. Missing System 6.6 Total 7. Table 45 (TOA) Q58. The aim of performing in as authentic manner as possible. Freq % Valid % Valid (Is in no way essential to a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 7 5.5 6. (Is rather insignificant from the point of view of a good performance of Greg. chant.) 9.4.8 (Is a credit but not a decisive factor for a good performance.) 5.8.5 4 (Is recommendable but not mandatory.) 4..6 5 (Is sufficiently important to deserve a special emphasis but should not be overestimated.) 6.5 8.9 6 (Is recommendable that every performer makes serious efforts to achieve it.) 8 4. 6. 7 (Is one of the most essential aspects for a good performance of Gregorian chant.)..7 8 (Is completely indispensable for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 8.7 9.9 Total 87.4. Missing System 6.6 Total 7. Table 46 (TOA) Q59. Religious intention. Freq % Valid % Valid (Is in no way essential to a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 9 7. 8. (Is rather insignificant from the point of view of a good performance of Greg. chant.) 4..6 (Is a credit but not a decisive factor for a good performance.) 8 6. 7. 4 (Is recommendable but not mandatory.) 8 6. 7. 5 (Is sufficiently important to deserve a special emphasis but should not be overestimated.) 7.9 9. 6 (Is recommendable that every performer makes serious efforts to achieve it.) 9 5. 7. 7 (Is one of the most essential aspects for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 4.4 7.9 8 (Is completely indispensable for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 7. 9.8 Total 87.4. Missing System 6.6 Total 7.

467 Table 47 (TOA) Q6. A rhetorical approach to the music that is performed. Freq % Valid % Valid.8.9 (Is in no way essential to a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 9 7. 8. (Is rather insignificant from the point of view of a good performance of Greg. chant.)..7 (Is a credit but not a decisive factor for a good performance.) 7.4 5. 4 (Is recommendable but not mandatory.) 4..6 5 (Is sufficiently important to deserve a special emphasis but should not be overestimated.)..7 6 (Is recommendable that every performer makes serious efforts to achieve it.) 7. 9.8 7 (Is one of the most essential aspects for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 4..6 8 (Is completely indispensable for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 8 6. 7. Total 87.4. Missing System 6.6 Total 7. Table 48 (TOA) Q6. Avoiding a routine interpretation. Freq % Valid % Valid (Is in no way essential to a good performance of Gregorian chant.).4.7 (Is rather insignificant from the point of view of a good performance of Greg. chant.) 8 6. 7. (Is a credit but not a decisive factor for a good performance.) 5.9 4.5 4 (Is recommendable but not mandatory.) 9 7. 8. 5 (Is sufficiently important to deserve a special emphasis but should not be overestimated.) 8 4. 6. 6 (Is recommendable that every performer makes serious efforts to achieve it.) 4 8.9.6 7 (Is one of the most essential aspects for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 4 8.9.6 8 (Is completely indispensable for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 5.7 8. Total 87.4. Missing System 6.6 Total 7. Table 49 (TOA) Q6. Semiological precision. Freq % Valid % Valid (Is in no way essential to a good performance of Gregorian chant.).6.8 (Is rather insignificant from the point of view of a good performance of Greg. chant.) 8 6. 7. (Is a credit but not a decisive factor for a good performance.) 9.4.8 4 (Is recommendable but not mandatory.) 9 7. 8. 5 (Is sufficiently important to deserve a special emphasis but should not be overestimated.) 8..7 6 (Is recommendable that every performer makes serious efforts to achieve it.) 8..7 7 (Is one of the most essential aspects for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 6.6 4.4 8 (Is completely indispensable for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 8 4. 6. Total 87.4. Missing System 6.6 Total 7. Table 5 (TOA) Q6. An accurate costume. Freq % Valid % Valid (Is in no way essential to a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 4. 8. (Is rather insignificant from the point of view of a good performance of Greg. chant.) 6.5.6 (Is a credit but not a decisive factor for a good performance.) 9.4.9 4 (Is recommendable but not mandatory.) 4..7 5 (Is sufficiently important to deserve a special emphasis but should not be overestimated.) 7.9 9. 6 (Is recommendable that every performer makes serious efforts to achieve it.) 4..6 7 (Is one of the most essential aspects for a good performance of Gregorian chant.).6.8 Total 86.6. Missing System 7.4 Total 7.

468 Table 5 (TOA) Q64. An accurate venue for performance. Freq % Valid % Valid (Is in no way essential to a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 5.8.6 (Is rather insignificant from the point of view of a good performance of Greg. chant.) 9.4.9 (Is a credit but not a decisive factor for a good performance.) 9.4.9 4 (Is recommendable but not mandatory.) 4 8.9.8 5 (Is sufficiently important to deserve a special emphasis but should not be overestimated.) 6.6 4.5 6 (Is recommendable that every performer makes serious efforts to achieve it.) 4..7 7 (Is one of the most essential aspects for a good performance of Gregorian chant.)..8 8 (Is completely indispensable for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 4..6 Total 86.6. Missing System 7.4 Total 7. Table 5 (TOA) Q65. Textual narrative. Freq % Valid % Valid (Is in no way essential to a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 5.8.9 (Is rather insignificant from the point of view of a good performance of Greg. chant.) 9.4. (Is a credit but not a decisive factor for a good performance.) 9 7. 8. 4 (Is recommendable but not mandatory.) 5.7 8.5 5 (Is sufficiently important to deserve a special emphasis but should not be overestimated.) 7.4 5.7 6 (Is recommendable that every performer makes serious efforts to achieve it.) 8 4. 6.7 7 (Is one of the most essential aspects for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 9.4. 8 (Is completely indispensable for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 5.9 4.6 Total 8 85.. Missing System 9 5. Total 7. Table 5 (TOA) Q66. Theoretical knowledge of paleography. Freq % Valid % Valid (Is in no way essential to a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 6.6 4.4 (Is rather insignificant from the point of view of a good performance of Greg. chant.)..7 (Is a credit but not a decisive factor for a good performance.)..7 4 (Is recommendable but not mandatory.) 7.4 5. 5 (Is sufficiently important to deserve a special emphasis but should not be overestimated.) 4..6 6 (Is recommendable that every performer makes serious efforts to achieve it.) 6.6 4.4 7 (Is one of the most essential aspects for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 7.9 9. 8 (Is completely indispensable for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 9.4.8 Total 87.4. Missing System 6.6 Total 7. Table 54 (TOA) Q67. Theoretical knowledge of semiology. Freq % Valid % Valid (Is in no way essential to a good performance of Gregorian chant.)..7 (Is rather insignificant from the point of view of a good performance of Greg. chant.)..7 (Is a credit but not a decisive factor for a good performance.)..7 4 (Is recommendable but not mandatory.) 4..6 5 (Is sufficiently important to deserve a special emphasis but should not be overestimated.)..7 6 (Is recommendable that every performer makes serious efforts to achieve it.) 6.5 8.9 7 (Is one of the most essential aspects for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 9.4.8 8 (Is completely indispensable for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 9.4.8 Total 87.4. Missing System 6.6 Total 7.

469 Table 55 (TOA) Q68. Excellent intonation. Freq % Valid % Valid (Is in no way essential to a good performance of Gregorian chant.).8.9 (Is a credit but not a decisive factor for a good performance.).6.8 4 (Is recommendable but not mandatory.) 8 6. 7. 5 (Is sufficiently important to deserve a special emphasis but should not be overestimated.) 9.4.8 6 (Is recommendable that every performer makes serious efforts to achieve it.).6 7. 7 (Is one of the most essential aspects for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 8. 5. 8 (Is completely indispensable for a good performance of Gregorian chant.).6 7. Total 87.4. Missing System 6.6 Total 7. Table 56 (TOA) Q69. Following the right style of chant performance. Freq % Valid % Valid (Is in no way essential to a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 8 6. 7. (Is rather insignificant from the point of view of a good performance of Greg. chant.) 9 7. 8. (Is a credit but not a decisive factor for a good performance.) 7 5.5 6.4 4 (Is recommendable but not mandatory.) 9 7. 8. 5 (Is sufficiently important to deserve a special emphasis but should not be overestimated.) 8..9 6 (Is recommendable that every performer makes serious efforts to achieve it.) 7.. 7 (Is one of the most essential aspects for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 6.5 9. 8 (Is completely indispensable for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 8.7. Total 86.6. Missing System 7.4 Total 7. Table 57 (TOA) Q7. Understanding of what the text means. Freq % Valid % Valid (Is a credit but not a decisive factor for a good performance.).6.8 4 (Is recommendable but not mandatory.) 4..6 5 (Is sufficiently important to deserve a special emphasis but should not be overestimated.) 8 6. 7. 6 (Is recommendable that every performer makes serious efforts to achieve it.) 4 8.9.8 7 (Is one of the most essential aspects for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 8..9 8 (Is completely indispensable for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 49 8.6 44.5 Total 86.6. Missing System 7.4 Total 7. Table 58 (TOA) Q7. Animated performance. Freq % Valid % Valid (Is in no way essential to a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 7.9 9. (Is rather insignificant from the point of view of a good performance of Greg. chant.) 6.6 4.5 (Is a credit but not a decisive factor for a good performance.) 9 7. 8. 4 (Is recommendable but not mandatory.) 8 6. 7. 5 (Is sufficiently important to deserve a special emphasis but should not be overestimated.) 9 5. 7. 6 (Is recommendable that every performer makes serious efforts to achieve it.) 6.5 9. 7 (Is one of the most essential aspects for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 9.4.9 8 (Is completely indispensable for a good performance of Gregorian chant.) 5.8.6 Total 86.6. Missing System 7.4 Total 7.

47 75. 84. Please name in the order of importance up to persons that, for you, are key figures in Gregorian chant from the beginning of the 9th century, such as singers, musicologists, clergy, Church politicians. The same names that appeared in the list above can be repeated. Table 59 (TOA) Q75 Freq % Valid % Valid *Abbey of Solesmes 6 4.7 6.5 *Ensemble Sequentia.8. *Musicology of the th century.8. André Mocquereau 7 5.5 7.6 Benedict XVI, pope.8. Clément Morin.8. Daniel Saulnier.8. Eugéne Cardine 9 5..7 Francois Auguste Gevaert.8. Godehard Joppich.8. Gregory Labus.8. Greta Mary Hair.8. Helmut Hucke.8. Henry Bremridge Briggs.8. Iegor Reznikoff.4. Jaan Eik Tulve.8. John Paul II, pope.8. Joop Bergsma.8. Joseph Gajard.8. Joseph Pothier 6 4.7 6.5 Louis Marie Vigne.8. Mary Berry.8. Peter Jeffery.8. Peter Wagner.8. Pius X, pope, saint 5.9 5.4 Prosper Guéranger 9 5..7 Rebecca Stewart.8. Taivo Niitvägi.8. Toivo Tulev.6. Willi Apel.8. William Mahrt.8. Wim van Gerven.6. Total 9 7.4. Missing System 5 7.6 Total 7.

47 Table 6 (TOA) Q76 Freq % Valid % Valid *Abbey of Solesmes.8. *Ensemble Cambridge Singers of John Rutter.8. *Ensemble Organum.8. André Mocquereau 8 6.. Bernard Brockbernd.8. Christian Troelsgaard.8. Daniel Saulnier.4.8 David Hiley.8. Dominique Vellard.6.5 Eerik Jõks.8. Eugéne Cardine 6 4.7 7.5 Jaan Eik Tulve.6.5 Jean Claire.4.8 Johannes Berchmans Göschl.8. Joseph Pothier 6.6. Jules Jeannin.8. Kirsti Autio.8. Laurentia McLachlan, Dame.8. Luigi Agustoni 4. 5. Marcel Pérès.6.5 Marie Noel Colette.8. Martin Uhlenbrock.8. Mary Berry.6.5 Michel Huglo.8. Peter Wagner.4.8 Pius X, pope, saint 4. 5. Prosper Guéranger 6 4.7 7.5 Solange Corbin.8. Stanislovas Dobrovolskis.8. Taivo Niitvägi.8. Walter Howard Frere.8. Willi Apel.8. Total 8 6.. Missing System 47 7. Total 7.

47 Table 6 (TOA) Q77 Freq % Valid % Valid Alberto Turco.8. André Mocquereau 7.9.8 Ben Harrison.8. Bruno Stäblein.8. Constantin Floros.8. Daniel Saulnier.4.8 David Hiley.8. Dominique Vellard.6.6 Eugéne Cardine 7 5.5 9. Francois Auguste Gevaert.8. Godehard Joppich.6.6 Gregory Murray.8. Gregory Sunol.8. Gustav Jacobsthal.8. Isobel Woods Preece.8. Jaan Eik Tulve.8. Jacques Hourlier.8. Jean Claire 5.9 6.4 Johanna Korhonen.8. Johannes Berchmans Göschl.6.6 *Choir at St. Johns College in Cambridge.8. Joseph Gajard 4. 5. Joseph Pothier.4.8 Jules Jeannin.8. Kees Pouderoyen.8. Leo Treitler.8. Luigi Agustoni.8. Marcel Pérès.4.8 Marie Noel Colette.8. Miikael Krumpans.8. Nico Wesseling.8. Paul Delatte.8. Peter Wagner.8. Pius X, pope, saint 7 5.5 9. Prosper Guéranger.6.6 Richard Terry.8. Terence Bailey.8. Thomas Kelly.8. William Mahrt.8. Wim van Gerven.8. Total 78 6.4. Missing System 49 8.6 Total 7.

47 Table 6 (TOA) Q78 Freq % Valid % Valid *Abbey of Solesmes.8.5 Alexander McCabe.8.5 Alfons Kurris.8.5 André Mocquereau 6 4.7 9. Daniel Saulnier.6. David Hiley.4 4.5 Dominique Vellard.4 4.5 Edmund Horace Fellowes.8.5 Eugeen Liven.8.5 Eugéne Cardine 7.9 5. Gustav Jacobsthal.8.5 Helmut Hucke.8.5 Henri Delhougne.8.5 Jacques Hourlier.8.5 Jan van Biezen.8.5 Jean Hebert Desrocquettes.8.5 Johannes Berchmans Göschl.6. Joseph Gajard 5.9 7.6 Joseph Pothier.8.5 Justine Ward.8.5 Kees Pouderoyen.6. Kenneth Levy.8.5 Luigi Agustoni.8.5 Marcel Pérès.8.5 Margo Kõlar.8.5 Mary Berry.6. Matthias Kreuels.8.5 Michael Hermesdorff.8.5 Michel Huglo.8.5 Nicholas Sandon.8.5 Parisot dom (otsi eesnimi).8.5 Paul Salamunovich.8.5 Peter Wagner.6. Pius X, pope, saint 4. 6. Richard Crocker.8.5 Rupert Fischer.8.5 Total 66 5.. Missing System 6 48. Total 7.

474 Table 6 (TOA) Q79 Freq % Valid % Valid Alberto Turco.8.9 André Mocquereau.6.8 Andrew Moore.8.9 Antoine Dechevrens.8.9 Barbara Thornton.8.9 Benoit de Mallherbe.8.9 Bonifacio Giacomo Baroffio.8.9 Clément Morin.8.9 Dominikus Johner.8.9 Dominique Vellard.8.9 Eugéne Cardine.4 5.8 Godehard Joppich.4 5.8 Jacques Hourlier.8.9 James McKinnon.8.9 Jean Claire 4. 7.7 Johannes Berchmans Göschl.6.8 John Paul II, pope.8.9 Josep Benet.8.9 Joseph Gajard.8.9 Justine Ward.8.9 Kees Pouderoyen.6.8 Kenneth Levy.8.9 Laurentia McLachlan, Dame.8.9 Leo Treitler.8.9 Louis Marie Vigne.8.9 Luigi Agustoni.8.9 Luke Dysinger.8.9 Marcel Pérès.4 5.8 Maurice Durufle.8.9 Peter Wagner.6.8 Pius X, pope, saint.8.9 Prosper Guéranger.8.9 René Jean Hesbert.6.8 Stefan Klöckner.8.9 Stephan Harding.8.9 Theodore Marier.8.9 Toivo Tulev.8.9 Willi Apel.8.9 Total 5 4.9. Missing System 75 59. Total 7.

475 Table 64 (TOA) Q8 Freq % Valid % Valid Amédée Gastoué.6 5.6 Bernard McElligott.6 5.6 Bruno Stäblein.8.8 Daniel Saulnier.8.8 David Eben.8.8 David Hiley.8.8 Dominikus Johner.8.8 Dominique Vellard.8.8 Eugéne Cardine.4 8. Francis Poulenc.8.8 Francois Auguste Gevaert.8.8 Godehard Joppich.8.8 Heinrich Rumphorst.8.8 Ilkka Taitto.8.8 James McKinnon.4 8. Jean Claire.6 5.6 Jean Jeanneteau, canon.8.8 Johannes Berchmans Göschl.8.8 John Dyer.8.8 Joseph Gajard.8.8 Justine Ward.8.8 Kenneth Elliott.8.8 Lszlo Dobszay.8.8 Peter Wagner.6 5.6 Pius X, pope, saint.8.8 Robert Pozarski.8.8 Rupert Fischer.8.8 Savas Siatras.8.8 Total 6 8.. Missing System 9 7.7 Total 7.

476 Table 65 (TOA) Q8 Freq % Valid % Valid Alberto Turco.8. Alim Qasimov.8. Antonino Albarosa.8. Claude Debussy.8. Daniel Saulnier.8. Edward Roesner.8. Egon Wellesz.8. Eugéne Cardine.6 6. Ferdinand Haberl.8. Godehard Joppich.6 6. Gregory Murray.8. Hermann Abert.8. Jaan Eik Tulve.8. Jean Claire.8. John Baldovin.8. Joseph Gajard.8. Kenneth Levy.6 6. Lszlo Dobszay.8. Marcel Pérès.6 6. Marcin Bornus Szczycinski.8. Michel Huglo.8. Oliver Messien.8. Pius X, pope, saint.8. Rupert Fischer.8. Ruth Steiner.8. Susan Rankin.8. Wilfrid Stinissen.8. Willi Apel.8. Total 5.. Missing System 95 74.8 Total 7.

477 Table 66 (TOA) Q8 Freq % Valid % Valid *Abbey of Solesmes.8.7 André Mocquereau.8.7 Anselm Grun.8.7 Benedikt Lautenbacher.8.7 Benjamin Rajeczky.8.7 Bruno Stäblein.6 7.4 Daniel Saulnier.8.7 David Hiley.8.7 David Sullivan.8.7 Eugéne Cardine.4. James McKinnon.8.7 Jean Claire.6 7.4 Jean Jeanneteau, canon.8.7 Kees Pouderoyen.8.7 Laurence Bevenot.8.7 Luigi Agustoni.8.7 Michel Huglo.8.7 Olga Roudokova.8.7 Pius X, pope, saint.6 7.4 Pius XII, pope.8.7 Vincent d'indy (85 9).8.7 Wouter Swets.8.7 Total 7.. Missing System 78.7 Total 7. Table 67 (TOA) Q8 Freq % Valid % Valid Alf Häredlin.8 4. Anne Kleivset.8 4. Antonino Albarosa.8 4. Benedict XVI, pope.8 4. Daniel Saulnier.6 8. Eugéne Cardine.8 4. Ewald Jammers.8 4. Godehard Joppich.8 4. Hafiz Burhan.8 4. Heribert Graab.8 4. Jan Vollaerts.8 4. Jean Claire.8 4. Johannes Berchmans Göschl.6 8. Lila Collamore.8 4. Louis Marie Vigne.8 4. Luigi Agustoni.8 4. Lycourgos Angelopoulos.8 4. Mary Berry.8 4. Michel Huglo.8 4. Oliver Messien.8 4. Peter Wagner.8 4. Prosper Guéranger.8 4. Richard Crocker.8 4. Total 5 9.7. Missing System 8. Total 7.

478 Table 68 (TOA) Q84 Freq % Valid % Valid *Community of Domenicans in Kracow.8 4.8 Benedict XVI, pope.8 4.8 Carl Allan Moberg.8 4.8 Daniel Saulnier.8 4.8 David Hiley.8 4.8 Frans Mariman.8 4.8 Fulvio Rampi.8 4.8 Inga Behrendt.8 4.8 Isaac Algazi.8 4.8 Jaan Eik Tulve.8 4.8 Jean Claire.6 9.5 Jules Jeannin.8 4.8 Laurentius Schlieker.8 4.8 Luigi Agustoni.8 4.8 Mary Berry.8 4.8 Peter Wagner.8 4.8 Pius X, pope, saint.8 4.8 Robert Skeris.8 4.8 Rupert Fischer.8 4.8 Walter Howard Frere.8 4.8 Total 6.5. Missing System 6 8.5 Total 7.

479 Q85 95 How would you characterize the relationship between music and text in Gregorian chant? Table 69 (TOA) Q85. This relationship means that music and text are inseparable, i.e. they absolutely belong together. Freq % Valid % Valid (In no way means that.) 6 4.7 5.7 (Essentially does not mean that.) 5.9 4.8 (Means that to a small extent but not significantly.).6.9 4 (Means that to a certain extent.) 7.9 9.5 5 (Means that to a moderate extent.) 7 5.5 6.7 6 (Means that to a great extent, belonging in fact to the essential meanings.) 5.7 9. 7 (Is one of the most essential meanings.) 7. 5.7 8 (Is the primary meaning, the most essential, for me.) 8. 6.7 Total 5 8.7. Missing System 7. Total 7. Table 7 (TOA) Q86. This relationship means that music and text are different structures but they exist Freq % Valid % Valid.8. (In no way means that.).4.9 (Essentially does not mean that.) 4..8 (Means that to a small extent but not significantly.) 6 4.7 5.8 4 (Means that to a certain extent.)..5 5 (Means that to a moderate extent.) 8.7.6 6 (Means that to a great extent, belonging in fact to the essential meanings.)..5 7 (Is one of the most essential meanings.) 5 9.7 4. 8 (Is the primary meaning, the most essential, for me.) 8. 6.9 Total 4 8.9. Missing System 8. Total 7. Table 7 (TOA) Q87. This relationship means that music is only a means of transmitting the text, i.e. the text is what is essential, and music only helps to express it. Freq % Valid % Valid (In no way means that.) 4..8 (Essentially does not mean that.) 9 7. 8.7 (Means that to a small extent but not significantly.) 5.9 4.8 4 (Means that to a certain extent.) 9 5. 8. 5 (Means that to a moderate extent.) 5.7 9. 6 (Means that to a great extent, belonging in fact to the essential meanings.) 7.9 9.6 7 (Is one of the most essential meanings.) 6.5. 8 (Is the primary meaning, the most essential, for me.) 6.6 5.4 Total 4 8.9. Missing System 8. Total 7. Table 7 (TOA) Q88. This relationship means that music constitutes a paraphrase of the text, i.e. music contains/carries the meaning of the text even without the text itself. Freq % Valid % Valid (In no way means that.) 7. 6. (Essentially does not mean that.) 9 5. 8. (Means that to a small extent but not significantly.) 8 6. 7.7 4 (Means that to a certain extent.) 5.7 9. 5 (Means that to a moderate extent.) 8 6. 7.7 6 (Means that to a great extent, belonging in fact to the essential meanings.) 9 7. 8.7 7 (Is one of the most essential meanings.) 6 4.7 5.8 8 (Is the primary meaning, the most essential, for me.) 7 5.5 6.7 Total 4 8.9. Missing System 8. Total 7.

48 Table 7 (TOA) Q89. This relationship means that text and music in Gregorian chant are related as much as in any other vocal repertory. Freq % Valid % Valid (In no way means that.)..4 (Essentially does not mean that.) 7.. (Means that to a small extent but not significantly.)..4 4 (Means that to a certain extent.) 5.8 4. 5 (Means that to a moderate extent.) 6.6 5. 6 (Means that to a great extent, belonging in fact to the essential meanings.) 9.4.4 7 (Is one of the most essential meanings.) 5.9 4.8 8 (Is the primary meaning, the most essential, for me.) 9 7. 8.6 Total 5 8.7. Missing System 7. Total 7. Table 74 (TOA) Q9. This relationship means that music is included in the prosodic intonation of the text and is brought forward by enhancement. Freq % Valid % Valid (In no way means that.) 9 7. 8.7 (Essentially does not mean that.) 7.9 9.7 (Means that to a small extent but not significantly.) 7 5.5 6.8 4 (Means that to a certain extent.) 4 8.9. 5 (Means that to a moderate extent.) 7.4 6.5 6 (Means that to a great extent, belonging in fact to the essential meanings.) 4..6 7 (Is one of the most essential meanings.) 4..6 8 (Is the primary meaning, the most essential, for me.) 8 6. 7.8 Total 8.. Missing System 4 8.9 Total 7. Table 75 (TOA) Q9. This relationship means that music and text are different structures, which have been combined together. Freq % Valid % Valid (In no way means that.) 6.5 7. (Essentially does not mean that.) 5 9.7 6. (Means that to a small extent but not significantly.) 9 7. 9.4 4 (Means that to a certain extent.) 6.6 6.7 5 (Means that to a moderate extent.) 7 5.5 7. 6 (Means that to a great extent, belonging in fact to the essential meanings.) 8 6. 8. 7 (Is one of the most essential meanings.).8. 8 (Is the primary meaning, the most essential, for me.) 4. 4. Total 96 75.6. Missing System 4.4 Total 7. Table 76 (TOA) Q9. This relationship means that music has been forced upon the text and earns its merits at the expense of the text. Freq % Valid % Valid (In no way means that.) 59 46.5 56.7 (Essentially does not mean that.) 6.5 5. (Means that to a small extent but not significantly.) 6 4.7 5.8 4 (Means that to a certain extent.) 5.9 4.8 5 (Means that to a moderate extent.) 4..8 6 (Means that to a great extent, belonging in fact to the essential meanings.).4.9 8 (Is the primary meaning, the most essential, for me.).8. Total 4 8.9. Missing System 8. Total 7.

48 Table 77 (TOA) Q9. This relationship means that the text is saying the same as what is narrated by the music. Freq % Valid % Valid (In no way means that.) 7. 6. (Essentially does not mean that.) 8.. (Means that to a small extent but not significantly.) 8 4. 7. 4 (Means that to a certain extent.) 8 6. 7.7 5 (Means that to a moderate extent.) 9 7. 8.7 6 (Means that to a great extent, belonging in fact to the essential meanings.) 4..8 7 (Is one of the most essential meanings.) 7 5.5 6.7 8 (Is the primary meaning, the most essential, for me.) 8 6. 7.7 Total 4 8.9. Missing System 8. Total 7. Table 78 (TOA) Q96. If, in your opinion, the logic of the text diverges from the logic of the music, which of the two would you prefer? Freq % Valid % Valid Logic of the text, in the first place. 4 8.9. Logic of the music, in the first place. 7.9 9.7 Sometimes one, sometimes the other. 9.7 7.9 In my opinion, in Gregorian chant logic of the text and music never diverge from each other..6 9. Total 8.. Missing System 4 8.9 Total 7. Q97 6 How precisely, in your opinion, is it possible to restore, on the basis of the information available to us, a historically authentic performance practice of mediaeval Gregorian chant of the Einsiedeln and St Gallen region? (7th to 6th centuries) Table 79 (TOA) Q97. 7th cent. Freq % Valid % Valid Completely impossible..6 9.4 Possible to a small extent. 4.5 9. Possible to a rather great extent. 7.4 6.7 I have no relevance in this. 5.8 4.7 Total 8.. Missing System 5 9.7 Total 7. Table 8 (TOA) Q98. 8th cent. Freq % Valid % Valid Completely impossible. 8..5 Possible to a small extent. 4.9 4. Possible to a rather great extent. 9 5. 8.6 I have no relevance in this. 7.4 6.7 Total 8.. Missing System 5 9.7 Total 7. Table 8 (TOA) Q99. 9th cent. Freq % Valid % Valid Completely impossible. 6.6 5.7 Possible to a small extent. 4. 4. Possible to a rather great extent. 7. 6.5 Fully possible to restore..6. I have no relevance in this. 5.8 4.7 Total 8.. Missing System 5 9.7 Total 7.

48 Table 8 (TOA) Q. th cent. Freq % Valid % Valid Completely impossible. 4..5 Possible to a small extent. 5 7.6.7 Possible to a rather great extent. 6 8. 4.6 Fully possible to restore..4.9 I have no relevance in this. 6.6 5.4 Total 4 8.9. Missing System 8. Total 7. Table 8 (TOA) Q. th cent. Freq % Valid % Valid Completely impossible. 9.4.7 Possible to a small extent..6 9. Possible to a rather great extent. 4. 9.8 Fully possible to restore..4.9 I have no relevance in this. 7.4 6.5 Total 8.. Missing System 4 8.9 Total 7. Table 84 (TOA) Q. th cent. Freq % Valid % Valid Completely impossible. 8 6. 7.8 Possible to a small extent. 6 8. 5. Possible to a rather great extent. 7 9. 6. Fully possible to restore..4.9 I have no relevance in this. 8 4. 7.6 Total 8.. Missing System 5 9.7 Total 7. Table 85 (TOA) Q. th cent. Freq % Valid % Valid Completely impossible. 6 4.7 5.9 Possible to a small extent. 7 9. 6. Possible to a rather great extent. 4 6.8. Fully possible to restore. 4..9 I have no relevance in this. 6.5.6 Total 8.. Missing System 5 9.7 Total 7. Table 86 (TOA) Q4. 4th cent. Freq % Valid % Valid Completely impossible. 6 4.7 5.8 Possible to a small extent. 5.. Possible to a rather great extent. 9.7 7.9 Fully possible to restore. 5.9 4.9 I have no relevance in this. 6.5.4 Total 8.. Missing System 4 8.9 Total 7.

48 Table 87 (TOA) Q5. 5th cent. Freq % Valid % Valid Completely impossible. 8 6. 7.9 Possible to a small extent. 6.5 5.7 Possible to a rather great extent. 4. 4.6 Fully possible to restore. 4. 4. I have no relevance in this. 6.5.8 Total 79.5. Missing System 6.5 Total 7. Table 88 (TOA) Q6. 6th cent. Freq % Valid % Valid Completely impossible. 8 6. 7.9 Possible to a small extent. 8..8 Possible to a rather great extent. 44 4.6 4.6 Fully possible to restore. 4. 4. I have no relevance in this. 7..8 Total 79.5. Missing System 6.5 Total 7. 7 9 Many performers consider authenticity as an essential aspect of performing Gregorian chant. What does "authenticity" mean to you? Table 89 (TOA) Q7. Singing exactly the same way as in the time when the music was created. Freq % Valid % Valid (In no way means that.) 8 4. 7. (Essentially does not mean that.) 5.8 4.4 (Means that to a small extent but not significantly.) 9 7. 8.7 4 (Means that to a certain extent.) 7.9 9.6 5 (Means that to a moderate extent.) 9 5. 8. 6 (Means that to a great extent, belonging in fact to the essential meanings.) 8 4. 7. 7 (Is one of the most essential meanings.) 9 7. 8.7 8 (Is the primary meaning, the most essential, for me.) 6 4.7 5.8 Total 4 8.9. Missing System 8. Total 7. Table 9 (TOA) Q8. Singing in a way that the music, precisely at the time of performance, sounds honest and genuine. Freq % Valid % Valid (In no way means that.) 7.9 9.6 (Essentially does not mean that.) 5.9 4.8 (Means that to a small extent but not significantly.) 7 5.5 6.7 4 (Means that to a certain extent.) 5.8 4.4 5 (Means that to a moderate extent.) 6.6 5.4 6 (Means that to a great extent, belonging in fact to the essential meanings.) 9 5. 8. 7 (Is one of the most essential meanings.) 5 9.7 4. 8 (Is the primary meaning, the most essential, for me.) 7 5.5 6.7 Total 4 8.9. Missing System 8. Total 7.

484 Table 9 (TOA) Q9. Singing in a way that music fits well into the context where it is performed. Freq % Valid % Valid (In no way means that.) 7.9 9.6 (Essentially does not mean that.) 4..5 (Means that to a small extent but not significantly.) 5.9 4.8 4 (Means that to a certain extent.) 6.6 5.4 5 (Means that to a moderate extent.) 4..5 6 (Means that to a great extent, belonging in fact to the essential meanings.) 7.4 6. 7 (Is one of the most essential meanings.) 7.. 8 (Is the primary meaning, the most essential, for me.) 6 4.7 5.8 Total 4 8.9. Missing System 8. Total 7. Table 9 (TOA) Q. What is your musical education? Freq % Valid % Valid I have no special musical education. 9 7. 8.7 I have elementary musical education. 4 8.9. I have a higher musical education. 8 9.9 6.5 I have a masters or doctoral (or equivalent) degree in music. 6..7 Total 4 8.9. Missing System 8. Total 7.

485 Table 9 (TOA) Q. When (what year) did you start your activities concerning Gregorian chant? Freq % Valid % Valid 94.8. 97.8. 98.8. 94.8. 94.8. 946.8. 949.8. 95.6.9 954.8. 956.6.9 957.8. 96.8. 96.6.9 96.8. 96.8. 964.8. 966.8. 967.6.9 968.4.9 97.4.9 97.6.9 97.4.9 97.6.9 974 5.9 4.8 975.6.9 976.6.9 978.8. 979.4.9 98.8. 98.8. 98.8. 98.8. 984.6.9 985 6 4.7 5.8 987 5.9 4.8 988 4..8 989 6 4.7 5.8 99.4.9 99 6 4.7 5.8 99.8. 99.6.9 994.4.9 995.6.9 996.8. 997.6.9 998 6 4.7 5.8 999.8..8..8. Total 4 8.9. Missing System 8. Total 7.

486 Table 94 (TOA) Q. When singing, we deliver notes of different durations. Assuming, that the increased value of duration can arise from either extending the duration of an individual note/individual notes, or slowing down the tempo, which of the two options do you use in Gregorian chant performance? Freq % Valid % Valid I extend the duration of the note. 5.7. I slow down the tempo. 4. 4.4 In the middle of the phrase I extend the duration of the note, at the end of the phrase I slow down the tempo. 9 7.. It depends. 4.9 47.8 I wish to describe with my own words. 4. 5.6 Total 9 7.9. Missing System 7 9. Total 7. Table 95 (TOA) Q7. Do you sing more at concerts or at church services? Freq % Valid % Valid at contcerts 7..8 at church services 6 47. 59.4 or less equally 9 5. 8.8 Total 79.5. Missing System 6.5 Total 7. Table 96 (TOA) Q. How often do you sing, conduct, or study Gregorian chant? Freq % Valid % Valid Several times a day. 5 9.7 4.8 Almost every day. 7 9. 6.6 At least once a week 9.8 8.7 At least once a month 7 5.5 6.9 Few times a year or less..4. Total 79.5. Missing System 6.5 Total 7. Table 97 (TOA) Q. Do you sing/conduct or study music other than Gregorian chant? Freq % Valid % Valid Yes 9 7.4 9. No 9 7. 8.9 Total 79.5. Missing System 6.5 Total 7. Table 98 (TOA) Q45. How often do you attend church services, i.e. the mass, liturgy, prayer services, meditations, adorations or other forms of organized worship? Please choose an answer. Freq % Valid % Valid Every day 6.5 6. Almost every day. 6 4.7 6. At least once a week. 46 6. 46.5 At least once a month... Few times a year or less. 8 6. 8. Total 99 78.. Missing System 8. Total 7.

487 Table 99 (TOA) Q46. How important is religion for you? The term "religion" is here taken as meaning the relationship with God. Freq % Valid % Valid Is completely insignificant. 5.9 5. Is equally important with the other factors. 5.9 5. Is slightly more important than the other factors. 4. 4. Is, for me, among the most important factors. 7.9. Is, for me, one of the most essential factors. 5.7. Is the most important factor for me. 55 4. 55.6 Total 99 78.. Missing System 8. Total 7. Table (TOA) Q47. Other than at church services, how often do you pray? Freq % Valid % Valid than once a day. 5 9.4 5.5 Almost every day. 8 4. 8. At least once a week. 5.9 5. Few times a year or less. 4. 4. I do not pray at all. 7 5.5 7. I prefer not to answer to this question. 5.8 5. Total 99 78.. Missing System 8. Total 7. Table (TOA) Q48. How often do you read the Scriptures? Freq % Valid % Valid Every day 9.8 9. Almost every day. 7.4 7. At least once a week. 6.6 6. At least once a month. 7.9. Few times a year or less. 9.4. I prefer not to answer to this question. 5.8 5. Total 99 78.. Missing System 8. Total 7. Table (TOA) Q49. Do you belong to a parish or congregation? Freq % Valid % Valid Yes 8 64.6 78. No 8..9 Total 5 8.7. Missing System 7. Total 7.

488 Table (TOA) Q5. What is your age? Freq % Valid % Valid 8.8. 9.4..6..8..6. 4.4. 5.4. 6.6. 7.4. 8.8. 9.4. 4 4. 4. 4.6. 4.4. 4.4. 44 4. 4. 45.6. 46 4. 4. 47.6. 48.4. 49.8. 5 7 5.5 7. 5.4. 5.6. 54.8. 55 5.9 5. 56.4. 57.6. 58.8. 6.6. 6.8. 64.6. 65.8. 66.6. 67.6. 68.8. 7.8. 7.6. 7.6. 74.4. 75.8. 76.8. 77.8. 79.8. 87.8. Total 78.7. Missing System 7. Total 7.

489 Appendix Correspondence to respondents concerning the Questionnaire (English). Recording respondents [Sub] To: [respondent] concerning Gregorian chant performance. Dear [respondent], I would like to thank you from all my heart for your contribution to this research. I know how busy person you are and this makes my appreciation towards your contribution even higher. Your recording has been of very precious and amply fulfilled the expectations of this project. As mentioned in the guidelines for the recording, I have developed a questionnaire for performers and scholars of Gregorian chant, which constitutes the second and final part of this work. I would humbly ask you to give approximately one more hour of your time, to answer the questions in the questionnaire. This questionnaire is the fruit of two years work of several people, and we put much hope on its results. I hope that, over about a month s time, you find possible to concentrate for an hour to fill the answers of the questionnaire. I am very much looking forward to your answers for June th, since at the end of June a report is due on the progress of the dissertation. Please read carefully the introduction. Should you have any questions, whether on the form or content, please e mail me and I will try to solve the problem as soon as possible. And finally if, after completing the questionnaire, you have any suggestions as to who else would be an appropriate respondent, I am happy to receive these suggestions. You can proceed to the questionnaire by clicking on the following link: [Respondents link] With best wishes and many thanks, Eerik Jõks

49. Respondents who were not willing to record [Sub] To: [respondent] concerning Gregorian chant performance. Dear [respondent] During the past year I asked you to record your Gregorian chant solo performance for my research project. Because of fully understandable reasons you were not able to take part in the project but I would like to thank you for considering your participation. My research has developed well and I managed to collect enough recordings to fulfil the project. I have also developed a questionnaire for performers and scholars of Gregorian chant, which constitutes the second and final part of this work. I would humbly ask you to give approximately one more hour of your time, to answer the questions in the questionnaire. This questionnaire is the fruit of two years work of several people, and we put much hope on its results. I hope that, over about a month s time, you find possible to concentrate for an hour to fill the answers of the questionnaire. I am very much looking forward to your answers for June th, since at the end of June a report is due on the progress of the dissertation. Please read carefully the introduction. Should you have any questions, whether on the form or content, please e mail me and I will try to solve the problem as soon as possible. And finally if, after completing the questionnaire, you have any suggestions as to who else would be an appropriate respondent, I am happy to receive these suggestions. You can proceed to the questionnaire by clicking on the following link: [Respondents link] With best wishes and many thanks, Eerik Jõks

49. Respondents solely for the questionnaire Variant [Sub] To: [respondent] concerning Gregorian chant performance. Dear [respondent] I am writing to ask your help with my research. I am a doctoral student at the University of York and my research is about the role of Gregorian chant in contemporary world. I have developed a questionnaire for performers and scholars of Gregorian chant, which is a material part of this research project. I would humbly ask you to give approximately one hour of your time, to answer the questions in the questionnaire. This questionnaire is the fruit of two years work of several people, and we put much hope on its results. I hope that, over about a month s time, you find possible to concentrate for an hour to fill the answers of the questionnaire. I am very much looking forward to your answers for June th, since at the end of June a report is due on the progress of the dissertation. Please read carefully the introduction. Should you have any questions, whether on the form or content, please e mail me and I will try to solve the problem as soon as possible. And finally if, after completing the questionnaire, you have any suggestions as to who else would be an appropriate respondent, I am happy to receive these suggestions. You can proceed to the questionnaire by clicking on the following link: [Respondents link] With best wishes and many thanks, Eerik Jõks

49 Variant (For anonymously sent e mails to schola masters of different monasteries.) [Sub] To: [respondent] concerning Gregorian chant performance. LAUDETUR IESUS CHRISTUS! Dear [respondent] I am writing to ask your help with my research about Gregorian chant. I am a doctoral student at the University of York and my research is about the role of Gregorian chant in contemporary world. I have developed a questionnaire for performers and scholars of Gregorian chant, which is a material part of this research project. I would humbly ask you to give approximately one hour of your time, to answer the questions in the questionnaire. This questionnaire is the fruit of two years work of several people, and we put much hope on its results. I hope that, over about a month s time, you find possible to concentrate for an hour to fill the answers of the questionnaire. I am very much looking forward to your answers for June th, since at the end of June a report is due on the progress of the dissertation. Please read carefully the introduction. Should you have any questions, whether on the form or content, please e mail me and I will try to solve the problem as soon as possible. And finally if, after completing the questionnaire, you have any suggestions as to who else would be an appropriate respondent, I am happy to receive these suggestions. I am sorry not to know your name I got the e mail address from the web. When you are finished the questionnaire can you please let me know your name. You can proceed to the questionnaire by clicking on the following link: [respondents link] With best wishes and many thanks, Eerik Jõks

49 Correspondence to respondents concerning the Questionnaire (Estonian) [Sub] To: [kasutaja] seoses gregooriuse laulu esitamist puudutavate küsimustega. Kallis [kasutaja] Ma tänan Sind kogu südamest panuse eest, mis Sa oma salvestusega käesolevasse teadustöösse oled andnud. Ma tean kui hõivatud Sa oled ja seda kõrgemalt hindan ma Sinu kaastööd. Sinu salvestusest oli palju kasu ja see täitis täielikult käsiloleva teadustöö ootusi. Nagu ma Sulle salvestuse instruktsioonis kirjutasin, olen koostanud küsimustiku gregooriuse laulu esitajatele ja spetsialistidele, mis moodustab käesoleva uuringu teise ja viimase etapi. Palun nüüd alandlikult veel umbes ühte tundi Sinu ajast, et vastata küsimustikule. Käesolev küsimustik on mitme inimese kahe aasta töö vili ja me kõik paneme selle tulemustele väga suuri lootusi. Ma väga loodan, et Sul on võimalik järgneva kuu jooksul keskenduda tunniks ajaks küsimustikule vastamiseks. Ma loodan saada Sinu vastuseid hiljemalt. juuniks mil ma pean oma õppetöö raames esitlema küsitluse vastuseid. Palun loe hoolikalt küsimustiku sissejuhatust. Kui küsimustik tekitab ükskõik milliseid probleeme kas tehnilisi või sisulisi, palun kirjuta mulle ja ma püüan neid esimesel võimalusel lahendada. Ja lõpuks kui Sul peale küsimustiku täitmist tuleb mõte, kellel veel võiks seda küsimustikku saata, on mul väga hea meel Sinu ettepanekuid kuulda. Küsimustiku juurde pääsed Sa klikkides alloleval lingil: [kasutaja link] Südamliku tänu ja parimate soovidega Eerik Jõks

494 Appendix Table 5 (additional). Number of responses, mean values, and variance of the answers to the questions 7 Gregorian chant for me means [an argument] ; sorted by mean; AMP=4.. Q An Argument R M V 7 [ ] a boring duty that I need to do routinely. 4.4.7 7 [ ] musical text, performed in a theatrical manner. 6.98. 8 [ ] an opportunity for career enhancement. 7.49 4. 4 [ ] exciting repertory that can be used to fill concert programmes. 7.67 4. 5 [ ] any kind of monodic Latin liturgical chant. 7.69 5.56 4 [ ] a method of composing liturgical music. 6.8 4.56 [ ] a bridge to Pre Christian cultures and spiritualities. 4.8 4.9 6 [ ] one vocal repertory among many others. 4 4..9 [ ] a collection of medieval manuscripts and liturgical texts. 6 4.7. [ ] an opportunity to investigate medieval notation. 7 4.45.68 [ ] an opportunity to introduce interesting music [ ] to the audience. 4 4.77 4.8 [ ] a broad based domain of musicology and liturgics. 6 4.9.9 6 [ ] beautiful melodies. 7 5. 4. [ ] a way of life. 7 5.9.7 7 [ ] inspiration for my musical activities. 7 5.5.74 [ ] liturgical song, to be interpreted according to certain rules. 7 5.4.6 6 [ ] a way of musical thinking. 6 5.46.75 4 [ ] a form of teaching about the Word of God [ ]. 5 5.65.67 [ ] meaningful texts. 4 5.97.57 9 [ ] Roman Catholic liturgical music. 7 6.4 4.8 5 [ ] a part of my activities as musician. 4 6.6.7 [ ] Franco Roman chant, a part of Latin sacred monody. 7 6..8 9 [ ] medieval monodic liturgical chant of the Western church [ ]. 5 6..9 [ ] thematically coherent and textually complete repertory [ ]. 4 6.4.97 [ ] the foundation of European professional musical culture. 7 6.5. 5 [ ] sacred text, illuminated by music. 6 6.5. 8 [ ] prayer. 6 7.4.4

495 Appendix Table 6 (additional). Number of responses, mean values, and variance of the answers to the questions 7 Gregorian chant for me is [an argument] ; sorted by variance; AMP=.4. Q An Argument R M V 7 [ ] a boring duty that I need to do routinely. 4.4.7 7 [ ] musical text, performed in a theatrical manner. 6.98. 8 [ ] prayer. 6 7.4.4 [ ] meaningful texts. 4 5.97.57 5 [ ] a part of my activities as musician. 4 6.6.7 [ ] thematically coherent and textually complete repertory [ ]. 4 6.4.97 9 [ ] medieval monodic liturgical chant of the Western church [ ]. 5 6..9 [ ] a collection of medieval manuscripts and liturgical texts. 6 4.7. [ ] Franco Roman chant, a part of Latin sacred monody. 7 6..8 [ ] a broad based domain of musicology and liturgics. 6 4.9.9 [ ] the foundation of European professional musical culture. 7 6.5. 5 [ ] sacred text, illuminated by music. 6 6.5. [ ] liturgical song, to be interpreted according to certain rules. 7 5.4.6 4 [ ] a form of teaching about the Word of God [ ]. 5 5.65.67 [ ] an opportunity to investigate medieval notation. 7 4.45.68 [ ] a way of life. 7 5.9.7 7 [ ] inspiration for my musical activities. 7 5.5.74 6 [ ] a way of musical thinking. 6 5.46.75 6 [ ] one vocal repertory among many others. 4 4..9 8 [ ] an opportunity for career enhancement. 7.49 4. 6 [ ] beautiful melodies. 7 5. 4. [ ] an opportunity to introduce interesting music [ ] to the audience. 4 4.77 4.8 4 [ ] exciting repertory that can be used to fill concert programmes. 7.67 4. 9 [ ] Roman Catholic liturgical music. 7 6.4 4.8 [ ] a bridge to Pre Christian cultures and spiritualities. 4.8 4.9 4 [ ] a method of composing liturgical music. 6.8 4.56 5 [ ] any kind of monodic Latin liturgical chant. 7.69 5.56

496 Appendix Table 7 (additional). Number of responses, mean values, variance, ratio of mean and variance, subtraction of mean and variance, position of the arguments in the table of the answers to the questions 7 Gregorian chant for me means [an argument] ; sorted by the subtraction of mean and variance ( M V ). Q An Argument R M V M/V M V P 5 [ ] any kind of monodic Latin liturgical chant. 7.69 5.56.66.87 8 [ ] an opportunity for career enhancement. 7.49 4..6.5 4 [ ] a method of composing liturgical music. 6.8 4.56.8.76 4 [ ] exciting repertory that can be used to fill concert programmes. 7.67 4..87.55 4 [ ] a bridge to Pre Christian cultures and spiritualities. 4.8 4.9.89.47 5 7 [ ] musical text, performed in a theatrical manner. 6.98..94. 6 7 [ ] a boring duty that I need to do routinely. 4.4.7..4 6 [ ] one vocal repertory among many others. 4 4..9.8. [ ] an opportunity to introduce interesting music [ ]. 4 4.77 4.8.4.59 9 [ ] an opportunity to investigate medieval notation. 7 4.45.68..77 8 6 [ ] beautiful melodies. 7 5. 4..5. 7 [ ] a collection of medieval manuscripts and liturgical texts. 6 4.7..5.4 6 [ ] a way of life. 7 5.9.7.4.48 5 7 [ ] inspiration for my musical activities. 7 5.5.74.4.6 4 [ ] a broad based domain of musicology and liturgics. 6 4.9.9.49.6 6 [ ] a way of musical thinking. 6 5.46.75.45.7 9 [ ] Roman Catholic liturgical music. 7 6.4 4.8.4.76 [ ] liturgical song, to be interpreted according to certain rules. 7 5.4.6.5.8 4 [ ] a form of teaching about the Word of God [ ]. 5 5.65.67.54.99 9 [ ] the foundation of European professional musical culture. 7 6.5..86.8 8 [ ] Franco Roman chant, a part of Latin sacred monody. 7 6..8.86.85 7 5 [ ] sacred text, illuminated by music. 6 6.5..88.9 6 9 [ ] medieval monodic liturgical chant of the Western church [ ]. 5 6..9.9.9 5 [ ] thematically coherent and textually complete repertory [ ]. 4 6.4.97.7.8 4 5 [ ] a part of my activities as musician. 4 6.6.7..4 [ ] meaningful texts. 4 5.97.57..4 8 [ ] prayer. 6 7.4.4.96 4.7

497 Appendix 4 Table 8 (additional). Number of responses, mean values and variance of the answers to the questions 4 7 How important is [an argument] for a good performance of Gregorian chant? ; sorted by mean; AMP=4.7. Q An Argument R M V 6 [ ] an accurate costume [ ]?.49.64 56 [ ] imitation of one's teacher [ ]?.5.59 5 [ ] an idiolectic (personal and original) approach to the music [ ]?.7 4. 64 [ ] an accurate venue for performance [ ]? 4.6 4.8 65 [ ] textual narrative [ ]? 8 4.9 4. 66 [ ] theoretical knowledge of paleography [ ]? 4. 5.6 57 [ ] singing from memory [ ]? 4.7.54 6 [ ] a rhetorical approach to the music that is performed [ ]? 4.5 4.47 67 [ ] theoretical knowledge of semiology [ ]? 4.55 4.96 49 [ ] knowledge of the historical background [ ]? 4.65. 58 [ ] the aim of performing in as authentic manner as possible [ ]? 4.7 4. 7 [ ] animated performance [ ]? 4.78 5. 44 [ ] variety of dynamics [ ]? 4.87 4.9 69 [ ] following the right style of chant performance [ ]? 5.4 4. 48 [ ] a personal contribution to the exegesis of text [ ]? 5.7 4.58 5 [ ] singer s belief in the text that is performed [ ]? 5.9 4.8 5 [ ] respecting the individualities of the 8 modes [ ]? 5.4.5 6 [ ] semiological precision [ ]? 5.4.57 47 [ ] excellent vocal quality [ ]? 5.5.9 55 [ ] liturgical environment [ ]? 5.6.7 59 [ ] religious intention [ ]? 5.68 4.64 6 [ ] avoiding a routine interpretation [ ]? 5.69.6 4 [ ] agogic variety (subtle changes of tempo related to phrasing) [ ]? 5.88.49 54 [ ] general musicality of the performer [ ]? 5.99.9 46 [ ] excellent diction [ ]? 6..5 4 [ ] excellent articulation [ ]? 6.8.6 45 [ ] musical phrasing [ ]? 6.4.4 5 [ ] passive comprehension of the Latin language [ ] [ ]? 6.4.9 68 [ ] excellent intonation [ ]? 6.44.94 7 [ ] understanding of what the text means [ ]? 6.9.58

498 Appendix 5 Table 9 (additional). Number of responses, mean values and variance of the answers to the questions 4 7 How important is [an argument] for a good performance of Gregorian chant? ; sorted by variance; AMP=.. Q An Argument R M V 7 [ ] understanding of what the text means [ ]? 6.9.58 47 [ ] excellent vocal quality [ ]? 5.5.9 54 [ ] general musicality of the performer [ ]? 5.99.9 5 [ ] passive comprehension of the Latin language [ ] [ ]? 6.4.9 68 [ ] excellent intonation [ ]? 6.44.94 45 [ ] musical phrasing [ ]? 6.4.4 46 [ ] excellent diction [ ]? 6..5 4 [ ] excellent articulation [ ]? 6.8.6 6 [ ] an accurate costume [ ]?.49.64 49 [ ] knowledge of the historical background [ ]? 4.65. 4 [ ] agogic variety (subtle changes of tempo related to phrasing) [ ]? 5.88.49 5 [ ] respecting the individualities of the 8 modes [ ]? 5.4.5 57 [ ] singing from memory [ ]? 4.7.54 6 [ ] semiological precision [ ]? 5.4.57 56 [ ] imitation of one's teacher [ ]?.5.59 6 [ ] avoiding a routine interpretation [ ]? 5.69.6 55 [ ] liturgical environment [ ]? 5.6.7 5 [ ] an idiolectic (personal and original) approach to the music [ ]?.7 4. 64 [ ] an accurate venue for performance [ ]? 4.6 4.8 69 [ ] following the right style of chant performance [ ]? 5.4 4. 58 [ ] the aim of performing in as authentic manner as possible [ ]? 4.7 4. 44 [ ] variety of dynamics [ ]? 4.87 4.9 65 [ ] textual narrative [ ]? 8 4.9 4. 6 [ ] a rhetorical approach to the music that is performed [ ]? 4.5 4.47 48 [ ] a personal contribution to the exegesis of text [ ]? 5.7 4.58 59 [ ] religious intention [ ]? 5.68 4.64 5 [ ] singer s belief in the text that is performed [ ]? 5.9 4.8 67 [ ] theoretical knowledge of semiology [ ]? 4.55 4.96 7 [ ] animated performance [ ]? 4.78 5. 66 [ ] theoretical knowledge of paleography [ ]? 4. 5.6

499 Appendix 6 Table (additional). Number of responses, mean values, variance, ratio of mean and variance, subtraction of mean and variance, position of results of the answers to the questions 4 7 How important is [an argument] for a good performance of Gregorian chant? ; sorted by subtraction of mean and variance. Q An Argument R M V M/V M V P 66 [ ] theoretical knowledge of paleography [ ]? 4. 5.6.86.7 67 [ ] theoretical knowledge of semiology [ ]? 4.55 4.96.9.4 5 [ ] an idiolectic [ ] approach to the music [ ]?.7 4..9.8 7 [ ] animated performance [ ]? 4.78 5..95.4 4 6 [ ] an accurate costume [ ]?.49.64.94.5 5 56 [ ] imitation of one's teacher [ ]?.5.59.98.6 6 65 [ ] textual narrative [ ]? 8 4.9 4... 7 6 [ ] a rhetorical approach to the music [ ]? 4.5 4.47..4 64 [ ] an accurate venue for performance [ ]? 4.6 4.8..8 5 [ ] singer s belief in the text that is performed [ ]? 5.9 4.8..58 44 [ ] variety of dynamics [ ]? 4.87 4.9..58 48 [ ] a personal contribution to the exegesis of text [ ]? 5.7 4.58..59 8 58 [ ] the aim of performing in [ ] authentic manner [ ]? 4.7 4..4.59 9 57 [ ] singing from memory [ ]? 4.7.54..8 7 69 [ ] following the right style of chant performance [ ]? 5.4 4..5. 6 59 [ ] religious intention [ ]? 5.68 4.64..4 5 49 [ ] knowledge of the historical background [ ]? 4.65..5.54 4 6 [ ] semiological precision [ ]? 5.4.57.5.8 5 [ ] respecting the individualities of the 8 modes [ ]? 5.4.5.5.87 55 [ ] liturgical environment [ ]? 5.6.7.5.9 6 [ ] avoiding a routine interpretation [ ]? 5.69.6.58.9 4 [ ] agogic variety [ ]? 5.88.49.68.9 9 47 [ ] excellent vocal quality [ ]? 5.5.9.9.6 8 54 [ ] general musicality of the performer [ ]? 5.99.9. 4.7 7 46 [ ] excellent diction [ ]? 6..5. 4.5 6 4 [ ] excellent articulation [ ]? 6.8.6.5 4. 5 45 [ ] musical phrasing [ ]? 6.4.4.4 4.7 4 68 [ ] excellent intonation [ ]? 6.44.94. 4.5 5 [ ] passive comprehension of the Latin language [ ]? 6.4.9.5 4.5 7 [ ] understanding of what the text means [ ]? 6.9.58 4.8 5.

5 Appendix 7 Table (additional). Number of responses, mean values, and variance of the answers to the questions 85 9 How would you characterize the relationship between music and text in Gregorian chant? ; sorted by mean; AMP=.9. Q An argument R M V [...] music has been forced upon the text and earns its merits at the expense of 9 the text. [...] music and text are different structures, which have been combined 9 together. 4.88.98 96..8 9 [...] the text is saying the same as what is narrated by the music. 4.8 5. [...] music constitutes a paraphrase of the text, i.e. music contains/carries the 88 meaning of the text even without the text itself. [...] text and music in Gregorian chant are related as much as in any other vocal 89 repertory. [...] music is included in the prosodic intonation of the text and is brought 9 forward by enhancement. [...] music is only a means of transmitting the text, i.e. the text is what is 87 essential and music only helps to express it. [...] music and text are different structures but they exist together in unity, 86 functioning as complementary to each other. 4.47 4.9 5.95 4.5 4.6 4.6 4 5.7 4. 4 5.89 4.5 85 [...] music and text are inseparable, i.e. they absolutely belong together. 5 6 4.7

5 Appendix 8 Table (additional). Number of responses, mean values and variance of the answers to the questions 85 9 How would you characterize the relationship between music and text in Gregorian chant? ; sorted by variance. Q An argument R M V [...] music has been forced upon the text and earns its merits at the expense of 9 the text. [...] music and text are different structures, which have been combined 9 together. [...] music is only a means of transmitting the text, i.e. the text is what is 87 essential and music only helps to express it. [...] music is included in the prosodic intonation of the text and is brought 9 forward by enhancement. [...] music and text are different structures but they exist together in unity, 86 functioning as complementary to each other. 4.88.98 96..8 4 5.7 4. 4.6 4.6 4 5.89 4.5 85 [...] music and text are inseparable, i.e. they absolutely belong together. 5 6 4.7 [...] text and music in Gregorian chant are related as much as in any other vocal 89 repertory. [...] music constitutes a paraphrase of the text, i.e. music contains/carries the 88 meaning of the text even without the text itself. 5.95 4.5 4.47 4.9 9 [...] the text is saying the same as what is narrated by the music. 4.8 5.

5 Appendix 9 Table (additional). Number of responses, mean values, and variance of the answers to the questions 85 9 How would you characterize the relationship between music and text in Gregorian chant? ; sorted by the subtraction of mean and variance. Q An argument N M V M/V M V P [...] the text is saying the same as what is narrated by the 9 music. [...] music constitutes a paraphrase of the text, i.e. music 88 contains/carries the meaning of the text even without the text itself. [...] music and text are different structures, which have 9 been combined together. [...] text and music in Gregorian chant are related as 89 much as in any other vocal repertory. [...] music has been forced upon the text and earns its 9 merits at the expense of the text. [...] music is included in the prosodic intonation of the 9 text and is brought forward by enhancement. [...] music is only a means of transmitting the text, i.e. the 87 text is what is essential and music only helps to express it. [...] music and text are different structures but they exist 86 together in unity, functioning as complementary to each other. [...] music and text are inseparable, i.e. they absolutely 85 belong together. 4.8 5..66.7 4.47 4.9.7.46 96..8.79.79 5.95 4.5.87.58 4 4.88.98.95. 5 4.6 4.6.4.57 4 4 5.7 4...5 4 5.89 4.5.4.74 5 6 4.7.44.8

5 Appendix Figure 4 (additional). Evaluations of the respondents on possibilities of restoration of historically authentic performance practice of medieval Gregorian chant. The chart is drawn on the bases of Table 6. Number of respondents 4 4 7 9 7 5 4 7 6 5 4 6 7 6 5 8 7 6 4 8 4 44 9 7 4 6 6 6 8 8 4 5 4 4 7 8 9 4 5 6 Centuries Completely impossible Possible to a rather great extent I have no expertise in it Possible to a small extent Fully possible to restore

54 Appendix Table 4 (additional). Mean and number of positive correlations ( Corr ) that are significant on the level. between the variables in the set of questions 7; sorted by Corr. nr Argument Mean Corr [...] liturgical song, to be interpreted according to certain rules. 5.4 7 [...] a broad based domain of musicology and liturgics. 4.9 5 [...] an opportunity to introduce interesting music and its underlying spirituality [ ]. 4.77 4 7 [...] inspiration for my musical activities. 5.5 [...] an opportunity to investigate medieval notation. 4.45 [...] a collection of medieval manuscripts and liturgical texts. 4.7 [...] the foundation of European professional musical culture. 6.5 6 [...] beautiful melodies. 5. 4 [...] exciting repertory that can be used to fill concert programmes..67 8 [...] an opportunity for career enhancement..49 5 [...] sacred text, illuminated by music. 6.5 [...] meaningful texts. 5.97 9 [...] medieval monodic liturgical chant of the Western church [ ]. 6. [...] thematically coherent and textually complete repertory for the whole church year. 6.4 4 [...] a form of teaching about the Word of God and what the teaching expresses. 5.65 4 [...] a method of composing liturgical music..8 9 5 [...] a part of my activities as musician. 6.6 9 [...] Franco Roman chant, a part of Latin sacred monody. 6. 8 6 [...] a way of musical thinking. 5.46 8 8 [...] prayer. 7.4 8 [...] a bridge to Pre Christian cultures and spiritualities..8 7 5 [...] any kind of monodic Latin liturgical chant..69 6 9 [...] Roman Catholic liturgical music. 6.4 5 6 [...] one vocal repertory among many others. 4. 5 7 [...] a boring duty that I need to do routinely..4 5 [...] a way of life. 5.9 4 7 [...] musical text, performed in a theatrical manner..98 4

55 Appendix Table 4 (additional). Number of positive correlations that are significant on the level. between the variables in the set of questions 7; A = correlations of all respondents (as in the previous table), column B = correlations of these 85 respondents who consider religion more important for themselves; sorted by column B. nr Argument A B [...] an opportunity to introduce interesting music [ ] to the audience. 4 6 [...] beautiful melodies. [...] an opportunity to investigate medieval notation. 8 [...] an opportunity for career enhancement. [...] liturgical song, to be interpreted according to certain rules. 7 7 [...] inspiration for my musical activities. [...] a collection of medieval manuscripts and liturgical texts. 9 [...] medieval monodic liturgical chant of the Western church [ ]. 4 [...] a method of composing liturgical music. 9 [...] a broad based domain of musicology and liturgics. 5 8 5 [...] sacred text, illuminated by music. 8 4 [...] a form of teaching about the Word of God [ ]. 8 [...] Franco Roman chant, a part of Latin sacred monody. 8 8 4 [...] exciting repertory that can be used to fill concert programmes. 7 5 [...] a part of my activities as musician. 9 7 [...] a bridge to Pre Christian cultures and spiritualities. 7 7 [...] meaningful texts. 6 [...] thematically coherent and textually complete repertory [ ]. 6 6 [...] a way of musical thinking. 8 6 5 [...] any kind of monodic Latin liturgical chant. 6 6 [...] the foundation of European professional musical culture. 5 9 [...] Roman Catholic liturgical music. 5 5 8 [...] prayer. 8 4 6 [...] one vocal repertory among many others. 5 7 [...] a boring duty that I need to do routinely. 5 [...] a way of life. 4 7 [...] musical text, performed in a theatrical manner. 4

56 Appendix 4 Table 4 (additional). Rotated component matrix of questions 7 (two components). N = variables with a values close to zero or negative. Argument Component [...] an opportunity for career enhancement..75. [...] an opportunity to introduce interesting music and its underlying spirituality [ ].656.9 [...] beautiful melodies..6.59 [...] inspiration for my musical activities..6.7 [...] exciting repertory that can be used to fill concert programmes..6. [...] an opportunity to investigate medieval notation..59.4 [...] musical text, performed in a theatrical manner..5.6 [...] a bridge to Pre Christian cultures and spiritualities..58.7 [...] a part of my activities as musician..5.4 [...] a broad based domain of musicology and liturgics..48. [...] a method of composing liturgical music..478. [...] a way of musical thinking..4.49 [...] any kind of monodic Latin liturgical chant..4.74 [...] one vocal repertory among many others..45.6 [...] a collection of medieval manuscripts and liturgical texts..95.87 [...] a boring duty that I need to do routinely..77. [...] medieval monodic liturgical chant of the Western church [ ] [of] Roman rite..8.765 [...] prayer..6.79 [...] a form of teaching about the Word of God and what the teaching expresses..56.687 [...] thematically coherent and textually complete repertory for the whole church year..7.659 [...] meaningful texts..85.64 [...] liturgical song, to be interpreted according to certain rules...64 [...] Roman Catholic liturgical music...564 [...] Franco Roman chant, a part of Latin sacred monody..7.5 [...] a way of life..4.46 [...] sacred text, illuminated by music..49.45 [...] the foundation of European professional musical culture..65.44

57 Appendix 5 Table 44 (additional). Rotated component matrix of questions 7 (three components); N = values close to zero or negative; N = variables with a positive value only in one component; N = variables with positive value in all components. Argument Component [...] medieval monodic liturgical chant of the Western church [ ]..789.89.97 [...] prayer..7.7.47 [...] thematically coherent and textually complete repertory [ ]..66.79.7 [...] liturgical song, to be interpreted according to certain rules..659.86.9 [...] a form of teaching about the Word of God [ ]..648..48 [...] meaningful texts..66.4. [...] Roman Catholic liturgical music..58.84.75 [...] Franco Roman chant, a part of Latin sacred monody..5.6.57 [...] sacred text, illuminated by music..447.98.7 [...] a way of life..4.8.5 [...] the foundation of European professional musical culture..4.54. [...] a collection of medieval manuscripts and liturgical texts..75.5.45 [...] inspiration for my musical activities..4.77. [...] a way of musical thinking..78.694.55 [...] a bridge to Pre Christian cultures and spiritualities..8.6.5 [...] a part of my activities as musician..78.588.95 [...] an opportunity to introduce interesting music [ ].66.559.6 [...] an opportunity to investigate medieval notation..7.58.7 [...] exciting repertory that can be used to fill concert programmes..8.48.64 [...] a broad based domain of musicology and liturgics..8.44.7 [...] a method of composing liturgical music..86.75.6 [...] beautiful melodies..77.55.675 [...] one vocal repertory among many others..99..68 [...] any kind of monodic Latin liturgical chant...8.558 [...] an opportunity for career enhancement..4.487.556 [...] a boring duty that I need to do routinely..8.66.58 [...] musical text, performed in a theatrical manner..67.6.48

58 Appendix 6 Table 45 (additional). Rotated component matrix of questions 7 (four components); N = values close to zero or negative; N = variables with positive value in all components. Argument Component 4 [...] medieval monodic liturgical chant of the Western church [ ].774.46.68.46 [...] prayer..756.9.86.4 [...] a form of teaching about the Word of God [ ].65.87.7.58 [...] thematically coherent and textually complete repertory [ ].6...48 [...] liturgical song, to be interpreted according to certain rules..68..8.6 [...] meaningful texts..6...8 [...] Roman Catholic liturgical music..588..7.59 [...] Franco Roman chant, a part of Latin sacred monody..47.9.94.7 [...] sacred text, illuminated by music..45.57.54. [...] a way of life..44.56.8.9 [...] an opportunity to investigate medieval notation..8.65.5. [...] a broad based domain of musicology and liturgics..95.69.5.5 [...] exciting repertory that can be used to fill concert programmes..89.574.. [...] a collection of medieval manuscripts and liturgical texts..98.545.98.8 [...] an opportunity to introduce interesting music [ ].5.484.9.6 [...] the foundation of European professional musical culture..46.48..64 [...] a method of composing liturgical music..47..9.45 [...] beautiful melodies..74.9.776.5 [...] any kind of monodic Latin liturgical chant..4.4.76.78 [...] one vocal repertory among many others..6.58.556.56 [...] an opportunity for career enhancement..65.96.56. [...] a boring duty that I need to do routinely...4.59.4 [...] musical text, performed in a theatrical manner..5.7.47.4 [...] inspiration for my musical activities..7.85.46.76 [...] a way of musical thinking..66.98.5.69 [...] a part of my activities as musician..67.84..57 [...] a bridge to Pre Christian cultures and spiritualities...77.9.549

59 Appendix 8 Table 46 (additional). Mean and number of positive correlations ( Corr ) that are significant on the level. between the variables in the set of questions 4 7; sorted by Corr. nr Argument M Corr 67 [...] theoretical knowledge of semiology [...] 4.55 48 [...] a personal contribution to the exegesis of text [...] 5.7 9 44 [...] variety of dynamics [...] 4.87 8 49 [...] the knowledge of the historical background [...] 4.65 8 6 [...] semiological precision [...] 5.4 8 66 [...] theoretical knowledge of paleography [...] 4. 8 68 [...] excellent intonation [...] 6.44 8 5 [...] an idiolectic (personal and original) approach to the music [...].7 7 58 [...] the aim of performing in as authentic manner as possible [...] 4.7 7 4 [...] excellent articulation [...] 6.8 6 6 [...] a rhetorical approach to the music that is performed [...] 4.5 5 6 [...] avoiding a routine interpretation [...] 5.69 5 7 [...] understanding of what the text means [...] 6.9 4 46 [...] excellent diction [...] 6. 5 [...] passive comprehension of the Latin language ([...]) [...] 6.4 57 [...] singing from memory [...] 4.7 64 [...] an accurate venue for performance [...] 4.6 4 [...] agogic variety (subtle changes of tempo related to phrasing) [...] 5.88 45 [...] musical phrasing [...] 6.4 5 [...] respecting the individualities of the 8 modes [...] 5.4 69 [...] following the right style of chant performance [...] 5.4 7 [...] animated performance [...] 4.78 56 [...] imitation of one's teacher [...].5 6 [...] an accurate costume [...].49 54 [...] general musicality of the performer [...] 5.99 9 47 [...] excellent vocal quality [...] 5.5 8 59 [...] religious intention [...] 5.68 8 5 [...] singer s belief in the text that is performed [...] 5.9 7 55 [...] liturgical environment [...] 5.6 6 65 [...] textual narrative [...] 4.9 6

5 Appendix 9 Table 47 (additional). Number of positive correlations that are significant on the level. between the variables in the set of questions 4 7; A = correlations of all respondents (as in the previous table), column B = correlations of these 85 respondents who consider religion more important for themselves; sorted by column B. nr Argument A B 49 [...] the knowledge of the historical background [...] 8 7 66 [...] theoretical knowledge of paleography [...] 8 7 67 [...] theoretical knowledge of semiology [...] 7 5 [...] an idiolectic (personal and original) approach to the music [...] 7 6 6 [...] semiological precision [...] 8 6 44 [...] variety of dynamics [...] 8 5 48 [...] a personal contribution to the exegesis of text [...] 9 4 58 [...] the aim of performing in as authentic manner as possible [...] 7 4 4 [...] excellent articulation [...] 6 45 [...] musical phrasing [...] 7 [...] understanding of what the text means [...] 4 4 [...] agogic variety (subtle changes of tempo related to phrasing) [...] 46 [...] excellent diction [...] 6 [...] avoiding a routine interpretation [...] 5 64 [...] an accurate venue for performance [...] 68 [...] excellent intonation [...] 8 47 [...] excellent vocal quality [...] 8 5 [...] respecting the individualities of the 8 modes [...] 54 [...] general musicality of the performer [...] 9 69 [...] following the right style of chant performance [...] 5 [...] passive comprehension of the Latin language ([...]) [...] 9 6 [...] a rhetorical approach to the music that is performed [...] 5 9 57 [...] singing from memory [...] 8 6 [...] an accurate costume [...] 6 65 [...] textual narrative [...] 6 6 5 [...] singer s belief in the text that is performed [...] 7 5 7 [...] animated performance [...] 5 56 [...] imitation of one's teacher [...] 59 [...] religious intention [...] 8 55 [...] liturgical environment [...] 6

5 Appendix Table 48 (additional). Rotated component matrix of questions 4 7 (two components); N = variables with a values close to zero or negative. Argument Component [...] theoretical knowledge of paleography [...].75.6 [...] theoretical knowledge of semiology [...].74. [...] excellent intonation [...].674.94 [...] semiological precision [...].656. [...] the knowledge of the historical background [...].654.6 [...] a rhetorical approach to the music that is performed [...].595.4 [...] excellent articulation [...].58.49 [...] an idiolectic (personal and original) approach to the music [...].577.4 [...] avoiding a routine interpretation [...].547.95 [...] musical phrasing [...].547. [...] general musicality of the performer [...].546. [...] respecting the individualities of the 8 modes [...].59.4 [...] understanding of what the text means [...].54.5 [...] the aim of performing in as authentic manner as possible [...].5.6 [...] passive comprehension of the Latin language ([ ]) [...].498.6 [...] excellent diction [...].49.74 [...] excellent vocal quality [...].479.59 [...] agogic variety (subtle changes of tempo related to phrasing) [...].47.66 [...] following the right style of chant performance [...].446.6 [...] animated performance [...].57.8 [...] an accurate venue for performance [...].55.4 [...] religious intention [...]..845 [...] singer s belief in the text that is performed [...].6.764 [...] liturgical environment [...].7.7 [...] an accurate costume [...].4.65 [...] imitation of one's teacher [...].78.564 [...] a personal contribution to the exegesis of text [...].99.59 [...] variety of dynamics [...].4.44 [...] singing from memory [...]..46 [...] textual narrative [...].6.86

5 Appendix Table 49 (additional). Rotated component matrix of questions 4 7 (three components); N = variables with a values close to zero or negative; N = variables with a positive value only in one component; N = variables with positive value in all components. Argument Component [...] a rhetorical approach to the music that is performed [...].6.99.6 [...] excellent intonation [...].67.9.78 [...] an idiolectic (personal and original) approach to the music [...].595.9.7 [...] an accurate venue for performance [...].58.9.49 [...] general musicality of the performer [...].544.9.95 [...] the knowledge of the historical background [...].57.8.67 [...] excellent vocal quality [...].5.8. [...] theoretical knowledge of paleography [...].5.5.7 [...] respecting the individualities of the 8 modes [...].47.76.5 [...] the aim of performing in as authentic manner as possible [...].459.45.86 [...] agogic variety (subtle changes of tempo related to phrasing) [...].65..59 [...] understanding of what the text means [...].4.748.8 [...] excellent articulation [...].5.658.58 [...] passive comprehension of the Latin language ([...]) [...]..6.75 [...] semiological precision [...].49.66.6 [...] excellent diction [...].48.595.84 [...] theoretical knowledge of semiology [...].49.59.4 [...] musical phrasing [...].47.49.5 [...] avoiding a routine interpretation [...].56.4.65 [...] animated performance [...].56.77.5 [...] following the right style of chant performance [...].9.55.4 [...] religious intention [...].5.79.78 [...] an accurate costume [...].9.9.79 [...] singer s belief in the text that is performed [...]..54.67 [...] liturgical environment [...].47..66 [...] imitation of one s teacher [...].9.8.6 [...] a personal contribution to the exegesis of text [...].96.44.5 [...] textual narrative [...].4.8.44 [...] variety of dynamics [...]..86.44 [...] singing from memory [...].8.9.48

5 Appendix Table 5 (additional). Rotated component matrix of questions 4 7 (four components); N = variables with a values close to zero or negative; N = variables with positive value in all components. Argument Component 4 [...] theoretical knowledge of semiology [...].8.9.4.9 [...] theoretical knowledge of paleography [...].789.69.85.9 [...] semiological precision [...].7...7 [...] avoiding a routine interpretation [...].595.4..44 [...] understanding of what the text means [...].584.5.56.58 [...] an idiolectic (personal and original) approach to the music [...].55.78.5.68 [...] a personal contribution to the exegesis of text [...].548.75.9.8 [...] passive comprehension of the Latin language ([...]) [...].54.9.95.5 [...] the knowledge of the historical background [...].54.9..99 [...] a rhetorical approach to the music that is performed [...].59.9.89.89 [...] excellent intonation [...].46.55.6.4 [...] animated performance [...].46.7..4 [...] respecting the individualities of the 8 modes [...].45.6..7 [...] agogic variety (subtle changes of tempo related to phrasing) [...].67.6.4.96 [...] following the right style of chant performance [...].5.6.98.9 [...] an accurate venue for performance [...].8.76.5.8 [...] an accurate costume [...].8.698.7. [...] imitation of one s teacher [...].9.547.56.8 [...] textual narrative [...].4.5.6.7 [...] the aim of performing in as authentic manner as possible [...].9.485.8.56 [...] variety of dynamics [...].8.448.44.77 [...] singing from memory [...].8.9.55.86 [...] excellent diction [...]...866.9 [...] excellent articulation [...].5.68.76.4 [...] musical phrasing [...].5.6.7.66 [...] excellent vocal quality [...].76..54.8 [...] religious intention [...]..55..84 [...] singer s belief in the text that is performed [...].8.9.5.8 [...] liturgical environment [...].5...69 [...] general musicality of the performer [...].4.55.4.49

54 Appendix Table 4 (TOA) A table of the key figures of Gregorian chant through all times as assessed by the respondents of the questionnaire. Position in the table (pos), names, frequency of nominations (fr), points (pt), and frequency of nominations on a particular position; sorted by points. Groups of people are marked with an asterisk. Some names have dates in the brackets. pos name fr pt 4 5 6 7 8 9 Eugène Cardine 49 58 8 5 5 4 Gregory I the Great, pope, saint 9 7 4 Prosper Guéranger 7 4 4 Joseph Pothier 4 7 6 4 4 4 5 Andrè Mocquereau 6 7 4 6 4 6 Charles the Great (74 or 747 84) 67 5 7 7 Pius X, pope, saint 7 6 8 *Medieval communities [ ] 9 79 5 9 Godehard Joppich 76 Dominique Vellard 75 Alcuin of York (75 84) 9 74 Jean Claire 7 Marcel Pérès 7 4 Guido of Arezzo 9 7 5 Joseph Gajard 66 6 Jaan Eik Tulve 7 6 7 Daniel Saulnier 9 58 8 Ambrose, saint, Bishop of Milan (74 97) 7 56 9 Hartker, monk 6 48 Johannes Berchmans Göschl 8 47 Toivo Tulev 5 4 Notker Balbulus (84 9) 6 7 David Hiley 6 6 4 Hildegard of Bingen (98 79) 5 4 5 Augustine of Hippo, saint (54 4) 4 6 Abbey of Solesmes 5 7 Luigi Agustoni 6 8 Kees Pouderoyen 7 9 Benedict of Nursia, saint (ca. 48 ca. 547) 4 9 *The Roman Schola Cantorum 9 Peter Wagner 5 7 Alberto Turco 6 7 Taivo Niitvägi 5 4 Richard Crocker 5 5 Chrodegang, saint, Bishop of Metz 5 6 Louis Marie Vigne 4 7 Iegor Reznikoff 4 8 Aurelian of Réôme 4 9 Willi Apel 4 Hucbald of St Amand (84 9 or 9)

55 pos name fr pt 4 5 6 7 8 9 4 Pepin the Short 4 Mary Berry 4 Constantine the Great 44 Anicius Manlius Severinus Boethius (c.475 55) 9 45 Wim van Gerven 8 46 William Mahrt 8 47 Thomas Aquinas, saint 8 48 Stanislovas Dobrovolskis 8 49 Bernard of Clairvaux, saint 8 5 James McKinnon 4 7 5 Marie Noël Colette 6 5 Jerome of Moravia 5 5 Paul Salamunovich 4 54 Odo of Cluny, saint 4 55 Benedict of Aniane, saint (745/75 8) 4 56 *Ensemble Organum 4 57 Stefan Klöckner 58 Eleanor Florence Dewey, Mother Marie du Redempteur 59 Antonino Albarosa 6 Amalarius of Metz 6 Marcin Bornus Szczycinski 6 Robert Anderson 6 Nereu de Castro Teixeira 64 Kenneth Levy 65 Jules Jeannin 66 Joop Bergsma 67 Jesus Christ 68 Jan Valkestijn 69 Holy Spirit 7 Greta Mary Hair 7 Clément Morin 7 Bonifacio Giacomo Baroffio 7 *The Second Vatican Council 74 *Abbey of La Pierre Qui Vire 75 Vitalianus, Pope 9 76 Werner Beheydt 9 77 Peter, the apostle, saint 9 78 Paul VI, pope 9 79 Pacífico Guimarães Filho 9 8 Michael Hermesdorff 9 8 Martin Uhlenbrock 9 8 Laurentia McLachlan, Dame (866 95) 9 8 Kirsti Autio 9 84 John Paul II, pope 9 85 Jaromír Černý 9 86 Francis Poulenc 9 87 Eerik Jõks (97) 9 88 Bernard Brockbernd 9 89 Benedict XVI, pope 9 9 *Roman Catholic church 9 9 *Ensemble Sequentia 9

56 pos name fr pt 4 5 6 7 8 9 9 *Abbey of Santo Domingo de Silos 9 9 *Celebraters of liturgy according to Eastern rite 8 94 Walter Howard Frere 8 95 Solange Corbin 8 96 Paul III, pope 8 97 Nico Wesseling 8 98 Miikael Krumpans 8 99 Maurice Duruflé 8 Johanna Korhonen 8 Jean Jeanneteau, canon 8 Jan Boogaarts 8 Isobel Woods Preece (956 997) 8 4 Hrabanus Maurus Magnentius (c. 78 856), 8 5 Gregory Murray 8 6 Frans Mariman 8 7 *Musicology of the th century 8 8 Stephen II, pope 7 9 Plato (c. 47 c. 47 BC) 7 Oliver Messien 7 Michael Stumpel 7 Meelis Tõns 7 Julius III, pope 7 4 Ina Lohr (9 98) 7 5 Ian Koukouzelis 7 6 Hubert Dopf 7 7 Henry Bremridge Briggs 7 8 Henri Delhougne 7 9 Guillaume de Volpiano (96 ) 7 Gregory Labus 7 Gregory II, pope 7 Fred Schneyderberg 7 Eugeen Liven 7 4 Barbara Thornton 7 5 Arnestus of Pardubice ( 64) 7 6 *Monks of the Cluniac order 7 7 Theodore Marier 6 8 Rupert Fischer 6 9 Nicholas Sandon 6 Michel Andrieu 6 Luca Ricossa 6 Leo I the Great, pope, saint (? 46) 6 Jean Langlais (97 99) 6 4 Jacques Hourlier 6 5 Hermannus Contractus 6 6 Gregor Baumhof 6 7 Claudian Mamertus 6 8 Carlo Hommel (95 6) 6 9 Alessio Randon 6 4 Sylvain Dieudonné 5 4 Robert Pozarski 5 4 Rebecca Stewart 5

57 pos name fr pt 4 5 6 7 8 9 4 Pius (5) V, pope 5 44 Kenneth Elliott 5 45 Katarina Livljanič 5 46 Justine Ward 5 47 John, the Archcantor of St Peter Rome mid 7th c. 5 48 Dominikus Johner 5 49 Charles Tournemire (87 99) 5 5 Celestine, pope 5 5 Bridget of Sweden, saint 5 5 Antoine Dechevrens 5 5 Alfons Kurris 5 54 Ruth Steiner 4 55 Marie Louise Egbers 4 56 Lilian Langsepp 4 57 László Dobszay 4 58 Jan van Biezen 4 59 Hermann der Lahme 54 4 6 Hermann Abert 4 6 Helisachar, abbot (8th 9th c.) 4 6 Heinrich Rumphorst 4 6 Gregory III, pope 4 64 Giovanni Pierluigi da Palestrina 4 65 Edward Roesner 4 66 Constantin Floros 4 67 Sergius, pope 68 Michel Huglo 69 Ilkka Taitto 7 David Sullivan 7 Benoît de Mallherbe 7 Wilfrid Stinissen 7 Pius XII, pope 74 Pius IX, pope 75 Matthias Kreuels 76 Lycourgos Angelopoulos 77 Lila Collamore 78 Kris van den Hauten 79 Benedikt Lautenbacher 8 Stephan Harding 8 Robert Skeris 8 Mryriam Van den Hauten 8 Michael Bernhard 84 Martin Gerbert 85 John Baldovin 86 Inga Behrendt 87 Anselm Grun 88 *Ensemble Enigma 89 *Community of Domenicans in Kracow Total 595 5 95 89 74 6 49 8 8 6

58 Appendix 4 Table 5 (TOA) A table of the key figures of Gregorian chant from the beginning of the nineteenth century, as assessed by the respondents of the questionnaire. Position in the table (pos), names, frequency of nominations (fr), points (pt), and frequency of nominations on a particular position; sorted by points. Groups of people are marked with an asterisk. Some names have their dates in the brackets. pos name fr pt 4 5 6 7 8 9 Eugène Cardine 54 4 9 6 7 Andrè Mocquereau 4 79 7 8 6 Prosper Guéranger 9 68 9 6 4 Joseph Pothier 6 5 6 6 5 Pius X, pope, saint 6 9 5 4 7 4 6 Jean Claire 5 5 4 7 Daniel Saulnier 5 9 8 Joseph Gajard 9 4 5 9 Peter Wagner 84 *Abbey of Solesmes 9 79 6 Marcel Pérès 75 Dominique Vellard 9 66 Luigi Agustoni 6 4 4 Johannes Berchmans Göschl 6 5 Godehard Joppich 59 6 David Hiley 8 47 7 Mary Berry 7 45 8 Jaan Eik Tulve 6 4 9 Kees Pouderoyen 6 7 Iegor Reznikoff Willi Apel 4 9 Wim van Gerven 8 Toivo Tulev 6 4 Michel Huglo 5 5 5 James McKinnon 5 4 6 François Auguste Gevaert 7 Jacques Hourlier 8 Kenneth Levy 4 9 Bruno Stäblein 4 9 Taivo Niitvägi 9 Alberto Turco 8 Jules Jeannin 8 Justine Ward 8 4 Louis Marie Vigne 8 5 William Mahrt 8 6 Helmut Hucke 7 7 Marie Noël Colette 7 8 Rupert Fischer 4 7 9 Clément Morin 6 4 John Paul II, pope 6 4 Gustav Jacobsthal 5

59 pos name fr pt 4 5 6 7 8 9 4 Laurentia McLachlan, Dame (866 95) 5 4 Leo Treitler 4 44 Benedict XVI, pope 45 Gregory Murray 46 René Jean Hesbert 47 Dominikus Johner 48 *Ensemble Sequentia 49 *Musicology of the th century 5 Amédée Gastoué 5 Bernard McElligott 5 Gregory Labus 5 Greta Mary Hair 54 Henry Bremridge Briggs 55 Joop Bergsma 56 Peter Jeffery 57 Rebecca Stewart 58 Walter Howard Frere 59 *Ensemble Cambridge Singers of John Rutter 9 6 *Ensemble Organum 9 6 Bernard Brockbernd 9 6 Christian Troelsgaard 9 6 Eerik Jõks (97) 9 64 Kirsti Autio 9 65 László Dobszay 9 66 Martin Uhlenbrock 9 67 Richard Crocker 9 68 Solange Corbin 9 69 Stanislovas Dobrovolskis 9 7 *Choir at St. Johns College in Cambridge 8 7 Ben Harrison 8 7 Constantin Floros 8 7 Gregory Suñol 8 74 Isobel Woods Preece (956 997) 8 75 Jean Jeanneteau, canon 8 76 Johanna Korhonen 8 77 Miikael Krumpans 8 78 Nico Wesseling 8 79 Paul Delatte 8 8 Richard Terry 8 8 Terence Bailey 8 8 Thomas Kelly 8 8 Alexander McCabe 7 84 Alfons Kurris 7 85 Edmund Horace Fellowes (87 95) 7 86 Eugeen Liven 7 87 Henri Delhougne 7 88 Jan van Biezen 7 89 Jean Hebert Desrocquettes 7 9 Margo Kõlar 7 9 Matthias Kreuels 7 9 Michael Hermesdorff 7 9 Nicholas Sandon 7 94 Parisot dom (otsi eesnimi) 7

5 pos name fr pt 4 5 6 7 8 9 95 Paul Salamunovich 7 96 Andrew Moore 6 97 Antoine Dechevrens 6 98 Antonino Albarosa 6 99 Barbara Thornton 6 Benoît de Mallherbe 6 Bonifacio Giacomo Baroffio 6 Josep Benet 6 Luke Dysinger 6 4 Maurice Duruflé 6 5 Oliver Messien 6 6 Stefan Klöckner 6 7 Stephan Harding 6 8 Theodore Marier 6 9 David Eben 5 Francis Poulenc 5 Heinrich Rumphorst 5 Ilkka Taitto 5 John Dyer 5 4 Kenneth Elliott 5 5 Robert Pozarski 5 6 Savas Siatras 5 7 Alim Qasimov (957) 4 8 Claude Debussy 4 9 Edward Roesner 4 Egon Wellesz 4 Ferdinand Haberl 4 Hermann Abert 4 John Baldovin 4 4 Marcin Bornus Szczycinski 4 5 Ruth Steiner 4 6 Susan Rankin 4 7 Wilfrid Stinissen 4 8 Anselm Grun 9 Benedikt Lautenbacher Benjamin Rajeczky David Sullivan Laurence Bevenot Olga Roudokova 4 Pius XII, pope 5 Vincent d'indy (85 9) 6 Wouter Swets 7 Alf Häredlin 8 Anne Kleivset 9 Ewald Jammers 4 Hafiz Burhan 4 Heribert Graab 4 Jan Vollaerts 4 Lila Collamore 44 Lycourgos Angelopoulos 45 *Community of Domenicans in Kracow 46 Carl Allan Moberg 47 Frans Mariman

5 pos name fr pt 4 5 6 7 8 9 48 Fulvio Rampi 49 Inga Behrendt 5 Isaac Algazi 5 Laurentius Schlieker 5 Robert Skeris TotalXX 59 9 8 78 66 5 6 7 5

5 Appendix 7 Table 6 (additional). Amount of influencing comparison variables in the set of questions 7. Argument Q8 [...] prayer. 9 Q4 [...] a form of teaching about the Word of God [...]. 9 Q [...] a way of life. 8 Q9 [...] medieval monodic liturgical chant of the Western church [...]. 7 Q4 [...] exciting repertory that can be used to fill concert programmes. 5 Q8 [...] an opportunity for career enhancement. 5 Q4 [...] a method of composing liturgical music. 4 Q7 [...] musical text, performed in a theatrical manner. 4 Q [...] the foundation of European professional musical culture. 4 Q [...] liturgical song, to be interpreted according to certain rules. Q [...] Franco Roman chant, a part of Latin sacred monody. Q6 [...] beautiful melodies. Q [...] an opportunity to investigate medieval notation. Q5 [...] sacred text, illuminated by music. Q [...] thematically coherent and textually complete repertory [...]. Q [...] meaningful texts. Q [...] a collection of medieval manuscripts and liturgical texts. Q [...] a broad based domain of musicology and liturgics. Q [...] an opportunity to introduce interesting music [...] to the audience. Q5 [...] a part of my activities as musician. Q6 [...] one vocal repertory among many others. Q7 [...] a boring duty that I need to do routinely. Q5 [...] any kind of monodic Latin liturgical chant. Q9 [...] Roman Catholic liturgical music. Q6 [...] a way of musical thinking. Q [...] a bridge to Pre Christian cultures and spiritualities. Q7 [...] inspiration for my musical activities.

5 Appendix 8 Table 6 (additional). Amount of variables in the set of questions 7 that are influenced by a particular comparison question. Argument q47. Other than at church services, how often do you pray? 9 Q49 Do you belong to a parish or congregation? 9 Q7 Do you sing more a concerts or at church services? 8 q46. How important is religion for you? [...] 8 q5. Catholics and other respondents 8 q48. How often do you read the Scriptures? 6 q5. Monastic and non monastic respondents. 6 q45. How often do you attend church services? 5 q5. Estonian, American, German and British respondents. 5 q5. European or non European respondents. 4 q. When [...] did you start your activities concerning Gregorian chant? q. How often do you sing, conduct or study Gregorian chant? Q Do you sing/conduct or study music other than Gregorian chant? Q What is your musical education? Q [...] [...] the increased value of duration can arise from [...] extending the duration [...], or slowing down the tempo, which [...] do you use [...]? q5. What is your age? Q5 Are you male or female?

54 Appendix 9 Table 6 (additional). Comparison of means of questions sacred text, illuminated by music (Q5); meaningful texts (Q); a form of teaching about the Word of God with Other than at church services, how often do you pray? (q47.). q47. Other than at church services, how often do you pray? Q5 Q Q4 Sig..4.4 frequently praying respondents Mean 6.4 6.4 5.97 N 67 67 68 Less frequently praying respondents Mean 5. 5.78 6. N 9 9 9 Respondents who do not pray at all Mean 4.9 4.9.57 N 7 7 7 Respondents who preferred not to answer to this question. Mean 6.5 6. 5.5 N 5 5 5 Total Mean 6.7 5.94 5.6 N 98 98 99

55 Appendix 4 Table 6 (additional). Amount of influencing comparison arguments in the set of questions 4 7. Argument Q55 [...] liturgical environment [...] 9 Q59 [...] religious intention [...] 9 Q5 [...] singer s belief in the text that is performed [...] 8 Q44 [...] variety of dynamics [...] 7 Q45 [...] musical phrasing [...] 5 Q48 [...] a personal contribution to the exegesis of text [...] 4 Q5 [...] an idiolectic (personal and original) approach to the music [...] 4 Q6 [...] semiological precision [...] 4 Q4 [...] agogic variety (subtle changes of tempo related to phrasing) [...] Q58 [...] the aim of performing in as authentic manner as possible [...] Q6 [...] an accurate costume [...] Q67 [...] theoretical knowledge of semiology [...] Q68 [...] excellent intonation [...] Q54 [...] general musicality of the performer [...] Q56 [...] imitation of one's teacher [...] Q57 [...] singing from memory [...] Q64 [...] an accurate venue for performance [...] Q65 [...] textual narrative [...] Q66 [...] theoretical knowledge of paleography [...] Q69 [...] following the right style of chant performance [...] Q7 [...] understanding of what the text means [...] Q7 [...] animated performance [...] Q4 [...] excellent articulation [...] Q46 [...] excellent diction [...] Q49 [...] the knowledge of the historical background [...] Q5 [...] respecting the individualities of the 8 modes [...] Q6 [...] a rhetorical approach to the music that is performed [...] Q47 [...] excellent vocal quality [...] Q5 [...] passive comprehension of the Latin language [...] Q6 [...] avoiding a routine interpretation [...]

56 Appendix 4 Table 64 (additional). Amount of variables in the set of questions 4 7 that are influenced by a particular comparison question. Argument Amount of variables Q5. Estonian, American, German and British respondents. Q46. How important is religion for you? [...] 8 Q7 Do you sing more a concerts or at church services? 7 Q. When [...] did you start your activities concerning Gregorian chant? 7 Q5. European or non European respondents. 6 Q5. Monastic and non monastic respondents. 6 Q. How often do you sing, conduct or study Gregorian chant? 6 Q48. How often do you read the Scriptures? 5 Q47. Other than at church services, how often do you pray? 5 Q5. What is your age? 4 Q5. Catholics and other respondents. 4 Q49 Do you belong to a parish or congregation? 4 Q What is your musical education? Q5 Are you male or female? Q45. How often do you attend church services? Q Do you sing/conduct or study music other than Gregorian chant? Q [...] [...] the increased value of duration can arise from either extending the duration [...], or slowing down the tempo, which [...] do you use [...]?

57 Appendix 4 Table 65 (additional). Comparison of means of the comparison questions with the partition of selected nationalities (Q5). Q4 Q4 Q48 Q5 Q5 Q58 Q59 Q6 Q6 Q66 Q67 Q68 Q7 Sig...49..45..4.9.....4.6 Estonian Mean 4.68 5.5 6.. 6.5. 6.7.4 5.5.7.89 5.89 6.79 N 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 American Mean 6. 6.7.8. 4.67 4.89 4.7 4.56 4.44.8.56 7. 6.78 N 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 German Mean 7.4 6.79 6.7 4.7 6. 5.6 6.5 6.4 6.9 5.9 6.9 6.7 7.64 N 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 British Mean 5.5 5.67.58.8 4.7.75 4.8.7 4..67.7 6.8 6.5 N Total Mean 5.8 6. 5.8.46 5.48 4.7 5.6 4.7 5..94 4.9 6.46 6.87 N 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

58 Appendix 44 When the quidelines were compiled, the house style of the University was not followed. I decided to add the text to the appendix as it was presented to the respondents. Therefore, there are some differences from the house style of the University. Guidelines for the Recording in English Thank you very much for participating in this research. Your contribution is most appreciated and it would not be possible to do the project without you. A significant number of chant performers all over the world are taking part in this research and I am sure it is going to give interesting answers about contemporary chant performance. There are two recording tasks I would ask you to fulfil:. Please sing Gradual Haec Dies with the verse Confitemini (Resp. + Verse + Resp.); please say the text of the responsory in Latin before or after the singing.. Please sing first verse of the hymn Veni Creator Spiritus in Latin and if the translation is also available in your own language; please sing first three verses from Psalm 95. (Cantate Domino) recto tono in Latin and in your own language. The reason for recording these items is to get comprehensive understanding of your singing style and to be able to analyse it from different perspectives. In the interests of comparison may I ask you to use Vatican or Solesmes editions as a source for melodies but if you want to use any other source, you are free to do that. May I ask you, please, to make this solo recording in a non revebrant room to as high a standard of quality as your present recording possibilities allow. If possible, please send the result to me on CD but any other carrier would do as well. If you are using CD the best format for the recordings would be *.wav. Because one of the key aspects of this project is to research the relationship of contemporary chant performers to the repertory they perform, I have devised a questionnaire, which I will take the liberty of sending you after you have made the recording. I very much hope you can find time to fill it in, as your individual answers will prove important to the final results and your input will contribute significantly to chant scholarship. I thank you again sincerely for your co operation.

59 Psalm 95: (from Roman Psalter) Cantate Domino canticum novum cantate Domino omnis terra cantate Domino et benedicite nomen eius bene nuntiate de die in diem salutare eius adnuntiate inter gentes gloriam eius in omnibus populis mirabilia eius

5 Appendix 45 Guidelines for the Recording in Estonian Suur tänu Sulle käesolevas projektis osalemise eest. Sinu kaastöö on kõrgelt hinnatav ja uurimus poleks võimalik ilma Sinu abita. Märkimisväärne arv gregooriuse laulu esitajaid üle kogu maailma osaleb selles projektis ja ma olen veendunud, et see annab huvitavaid vastuseid gregooriuse laulu kaasaegse esitamise kohta. Palun Sul teha järgmised salvestused:. Palun laula graduaal Haec Dies versusega Confitemini (Responsoorium + Versus + Responsoorium); palun ütle responsooriumi tekst ladina keeles enne või pärast laulmist.. Palun laula hümni Veni Creator Spiritus esimene salm nii ladina kui eesti keeles (palun kasuta eestikeelset teksti kirja lõpus); palun laula Psalm 95 (Cantate Domino, Laulge Issandale) kolm esimest salmi recto tono nii ladina kui eesti keeles (palun kasuta tekste kirja lõpus). Salvestatavad lood on valitud nõnda, et nad annaksid võimalikult hea ülevaate Sinu laulustiilist ja oleksid analüüsitavad mitmest aspektist. Erinevate esitajate parema võrdlemise huvides palun Sul kasutada meloodiaid kas Vatikani või Solesmes i väljaannetst. Kui Sa aga spetsiaalselt soovid kasutada mõnda teist allikat, siis palun tee seda. Palun tee oma soolosalvestus mittekajavas ruumis nii hea kvaliteediga, kui Sulle kättesaadavad salvestusseadmed võimalavad. Kui võimalik palun saada tulemus mulle CDl, aga ka teised helikandjad on arvestatavad. Kui postikulu peaks Sulle raskusi valmistama, siis võid salvestuse toimetada ka minu Tallinna aadressil, kust see mulle edasi saadetakse. Aadressid leiad kirja lõpust. Kuna käesoleva töö üks olulisi aspekte on uurida kaasaegsete gregooriuse laulu esitajate suhet esitatavasse repertuaari, olen koostanud lühikese küsimustiku, millele palun Sul lahkesti vastata peale salvestuse tegemist. Loodan väga, et leiad aega ka küsimustikule vastamiseks kuna Sinu vastused mõjutavad oluliselt uurimuse lõpptulemust ja Sinu osalus on oluline gregooriuse laulu esitamise uurimises. Tänan Sind veelkord kogu südamest koostöö eest.

5 Psalm 95: (Rooma Psalter) Cantate Domino canticum novum cantate Domino omnis terra cantate Domino et benedicite nomen eius bene nuntiate de die in diem salutare eius adnuntiate inter gentes gloriam eius in omnibus populis mirabilia eius Psalm 95: Laulge Issandale uus laul, laulge Issandale, kõik maailm! Laulge Issandale, kiitke tema nime, kuulutage päevast päeva tema päästet! Jutustage paganate seas tema au, tema imeasju kõigi rahvaste seas! Oh Looja Vaim, nüüd hingesse, Su lastel tule kõigile. Meid kõiki täida armuga, meid oma väega loonud Sa. (KLPR )

5 Appendix 46 Figure 8 (additional). Transcription of the Gradual Haec dies; numeration of notes is added by the transcriber.

5 Appendix 47 Histograms of different segments of 5 solo performances of the Gradual Haec dies: notes 8; notes 5; notes 8; notes 5; notes 99 5. These histograms were created to observe the representational quality of the solo recordings. Every performer has five histograms. Lengths of segments are with breaths. In all histograms, horizontal axis represents milliseconds and vertical axis represents number of notes. Histograms start from the next page for better observation qualities the histograms of one performer will be on one page.

54 Histogram. Kadri Hunt, Estonia; notes -8, total sec. 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram. Kadri Hunt, Estonia; notes -5, total 6 sec. 6 7 6 6 4 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 5 Histogram. Kadri Hunt, Estonia; notes -8, total 4 sec. 7 8 5 4 7 7 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram.4 Kadri Hunt, Estonia; notes -5, total 64 sec. 8 5 6 8 9 7 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram.5 Kadri Hunt, Estonia; notes 99-5, total 5 sec. 6 7 8 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5

55 Histogram. Lauri Jõeleht, Estonia; notes -8, total 8 sec. 6 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram. Lauri Jõeleht, Estonia; notes -5, total 4 sec. 8 6 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram. Lauri Jõeleht, Estonia; notes -8, total; 8 sec. 5 7 4 6 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram.4 Lauri Jõeleht, Estonia; notes -5, total 6 sec. 7 4 8 9 8 7 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram.5 Lauri Jõeleht, Estonia; notes 99-5, total 7 sec. 6 7 8 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5

56 Histogram. Eve Kopli, Estonia; notes -8, total 8 sec. 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram. Eve Kopli, Estonia; notes -5, total sec. 7 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram. Eve Kopli, Estonia; notes -8, total 5 sec. 7 4 6 6 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram.4 Eve Kopli, Estonia; notes -5, total 56 sec. 9 6 6 5 7 6 5 6 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram.5 Eve Kopli, Estonia; notes 99-5, total 5 sec. 4 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5

57 Histogram 4. Lilian Langsepp, Estonia; notes -8, total 8 sec. 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 4. Lilian Langsepp, Estonia; notes -5, total 4 sec. 8 8 4 6 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 4. Lilian Langsepp, Estonia); notes -8, total 8 sec. 6 6 6 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 4.4 Lilian Langsepp, Estonia; notes -5, total 6 sec. 9 9 7 7 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 4.5 Lilian Langsepp, Estonia; notes 99-5, total 7 sec. 7 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5

58 Histogram 5. Maile Nairis, Estonia; notes -8, total 8 sec. 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 5. Maile Nairis, Estonia; notes -5, total sec. 9 7 7 7 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 5. Maile Nairis, Estonia; notes -8, total 7 sec. 9 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 5.4 Maile Nairis, Estonia; notes -5, total 6 sec. 9 5 9 7 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 5.5 Maile Nairis, Estonia; notes 99-5, total 6 sec. 6 6 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5

59 Histogram 6. Jean-Pascal Ollivry, France; notes -8, total 8 sec. 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 6. Jean-Pascal Ollivry, France); notes -5, total sec. 8 7 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 6. Jean-Pascal Ollivry, France; notes -8, total 5 sec. 8 5 5 9 7 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 6.4 Jean-Pascal Ollivry, France; notes -5, total 58 sec. 9 9 8 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 6.5 Jean-Pascal Ollivry, France; notes 99-5, total 6 sec. 7 7 5 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5

54 Histogram 7. Peeter Perens, Estonia; notes -8, total 8 sec. 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 7. Peeter Perens (Estonia), notes -5; total 5 sec. 7 5 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 7. Peeter Perens, Estonia; notes -8, total 4 sec. 8 9 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 7.4 Peeter Perens, Estonia; notes -5, total 66 sec. 4 4 5 7 7 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 7.5 Peeter Perens, Estonia; notes 99-5, total 7 sec. 8 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5

54 Histogram 8. Maria Staak, Estonia; notes -8, total 8 sec. 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 8. Maria Staak (Estonia), notes -5; total 6 sec. 7 7 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 8. Maria Staak, Estonia; notes -8, total 4 sec. 5 9 8 4 5 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 8 Histogram 8.4 Maria Staak, Estonia; notes -5, total 65 sec. 5 5 8 6 7 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 8.5 Maria Staak, Estonia; notes 99-5, total 6 sec. 6 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5

54 Histogram 9. Jaan-Eik Tulve, Estonia; notes -8, total 9 sec. 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 9. Jaan-Eik Tulve, Estonia; notes -5, total 5 sec. 9 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 9. Jaan-Eik Tulve, Estonia; notes -8, total 9 sec. 7 7 4 9 7 4 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 9.4 Jaan-Eik Tulve, Estonia; notes -5, total 6 sec. 4 9 4 7 6 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 9.5 Jaan-Eik Tulve, Estonia; notes 99-5, total 7 sec. 5 4 6 4 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5

54 Histogram. Riho Ridbek, Estonia; notes -8, total 9 sec. 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram. Riho Ridbek, Estonia; notes -5, total 6 sec. 9 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram. Riho Ridbek, Estonia; notes -8, total 4 sec. 5 8 8 4 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 4 Histogram.4 Riho Ridbek, Estonia; notes -5, total 68 sec. 7 6 7 4 8 6 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram.5 Riho Ridbek, Estonia; notes 99-5, total sec. 4 6 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5

544 Histogram. Taivo Niitvägi, Estonia; notes -8, total sec. 7 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram. Taivo Niitvägi, Estonia; notes -5, total sec. 4 9 7 6 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram. Taivo Niitvägi, Estonia; notes -8, total 5 sec. 4 6 6 9 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram.4 Taivo Niitvägi, Estonia; notes -5, total 8 sec. 9 6 4 8 6 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram.5 Taivo Niitvägi, Estonia; notes 99-5, total sec. 7 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5

545 Histogram. Mike Forbster, UK; notes -8, total 8 sec. 6 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram. Mike Forbster, UK; notes -5, total sec. 6 7 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram. Mike Forbster, UK; notes -8, total 6 sec. 8 9 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram.4 Mike Forbster, UK; notes -5, total 58 sec. 4 4 7 5 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 5 Histogram.5 Mike Forbster, UK; notes 99-5, total 6 sec. 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5

546 Histogram. Chris Helfrich, USA; notes -8, total 8 sec. 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram. Chris Helfrich, USA; notes -5, total 4 sec. 8 9 8 6 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram. Chris Helfrich, USA; notes -8, total 4 sec. 7 9 4 6 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 8 Histogram.4 Chris Helfrich, USA; notes -5, total 65 sec. 9 5 7 4 6 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram.5 Chris Helfrich, USA; notes 99-5, total 8 sec. 8 8 6 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5

547 Histogram 4. Columba Kelly, USA; notes -8, total 9 sec. 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 4. Columba Kelly, USA; notes -5, total 7 sec. 8 5 6 6 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 4. Columba Kelly, USA; notes -8, total 4 sec. 7 7 8 8 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 4.4 Columba Kelly, USA; notes -5, total 67 sec. 4 5 4 5 7 9 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 4.5 Columba Kelly, USA; notes 99-5, total 8 sec. 7 7 6 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5

6 548 Histogram 5. Gereon van Boesschoten, Belgium; -8, total 8 sec. 6 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 5. Gereon van Boesschoten, Belgium; -5, total 6 sec. 8 7 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 5. Gereon van Boesschoten, Belgium; -8, total 4 sec. 6 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 5.4 Gereon van Boesschoten, Belgium; -5, total 68 sec. 4 6 6 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 5.5 Gereon van Boesschoten, Belgium; 99-5, total 9 sec. 5 6 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5

549 Histogram 6. Godehard Joppich, Germany; notes -8, total sec. 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 6. Godehard Joppich, Germany; notes -5, total 6 sec. 6 4 4 5 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 6. Godehard Joppich, Germany; notes -8, total 6 sec. 4 4 9 6 5 6 8 4 7 7 6 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 6.4 Godehard Joppich, Germany; notes -5, total 98 sec. 6 8 4 6 6 9 7 8 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 6.5 Godehard Joppich, Germany; notes 99-5, total 6 sec. 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5

55 Histogram 7. Guntars Pranis, Latvia; notes -8, total 7 sec. 6 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 7. Guntars Pranis, Latvia; notes -5, total sec. 9 9 5 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 9 6 4 Histogram 7. Guntars Pranis, Latvia; notes -8, total 6 sec. 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 7.4 Guntars Pranis, Latvia; notes -5, total 59 sec. 6 7 5 9 9 7 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 7.5 Guntars Pranis, Latvia; notes 99-5, total 6 sec. 8 7 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5

55 Histogram 8. Hilkka-Liisa Vuori, Finland; notes -8, total sec. 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 8. Hilkka-Liisa Vuori, Finland; notes -5, total 6 sec. 4 4 6 5 4 6 5 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 8. Hilkka-Liisa Vuori, Finland; notes -8, total 6 sec. 4 6 9 6 7 7 8 5 6 8 4 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 8.4 Hilkka-Liisa Vuori, Finland; notes -5, total sec. 6 5 8 7 9 7 5 4 7 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 8.5 Hilkka-Liisa Vuori, Finland; notes 99-5, total 6 sec. 6 5 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5

55 Histogram 9. Iegor Reznikoff, France; notes -8, total sec. 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 9. Iegor Reznikoff, France; notes -5, total sec. 6 6 6 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 9. Iegor Reznikoff, France; notes -8, total 57 sec. 6 4 8 7 4 9 5 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 9.4 Iegor Reznikoff, France; notes -5, total 88 sec. 8 7 9 8 9 5 6 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 9.5 Iegor Reznikoff, France; notes 99-5, total sec. 6 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5

55 Histogram. Martin Quesnel, Canada; notes -8, total sec. 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram. Martin Quesnel, Canada; notes -5, total sec. 9 8 6 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram. Martin Quesnel, Canada; notes -8, total 5 sec. 5 4 9 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 8 Histogram.4 Martin Quesnel, Canada; notes -5, total 8 sec. 6 4 4 5 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram.5 Martin Quesnel, Canada; notes 99-5, total sec. 6 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5

554 Histogram. Richard Crocker, USA; notes -8, total 8 sec. 6 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 9 Histogram. Richard Crocker, USA; notes -5, total sec. 6 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram. Richard Crocker, USA; notes -8, total 9 sec. 9 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 8 Histogram.4 Richard Crocker, USA; notes -5, total 64 sec. 7 9 8 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 5 Histogram.5 Richard Crocker, USA; notes 99-5, total 7 sec. 6 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5

555 Histogram. Richard Rice, USA; notes -8, total 9 sec. 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram. Richard Rice, USA; notes -5, total 7 sec. 9 6 6 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram. Richard Rice, USA; notes -8, total 4 sec. 4 9 7 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram.4 Richard Rice, USA; notes -5, total 7 sec. 9 9 4 7 8 7 4 4 5 7 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram.5 Richard Rice, USA; notes 99-5, total sec. 9 6 7 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5

556 Histogram. Lydia Stritzl, Germany; notes -8, total 9 sec. 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram. Lydia Stritzl, Germany; notes -5, total 6 sec. 6 6 7 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram. Lydia Stritzl, Germany; notes -8, total 4 sec. 6 4 7 6 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram.4 Lydia Stritzl, Germany; notes -5, total 69 sec. 9 5 7 5 4 6 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram.5 Lydia Stritzl, Germany; notes 99-5, total 9 sec. 5 6 7 6 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5

557 Histogram 4. Tim Pehta, USA; notes -8, total 8 sec. 4 5 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 5 Histogram 4. Tim Pehta, USA; notes -5, total 4 sec. 7 7 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 4. Tim Pehta, USA; notes -8, total 9 sec. 4 4 9 5 6 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 4.4 Tim Pehta, USA; notes -5, total 64 sec. 5 5 5 6 4 6 5 6 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 4.5 Tim Pehta, USA; notes 99-5, total 8 sec. 7 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5

558 Histogram 5. Ulrike Heider, Germany; notes -8, total 8 sec. 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 5. Ulrike Heider, Germany; notes -5, total 5 sec. 9 5 4 6 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 5. Ulrike Heider, Germany; notes -8, total 4 sec. 7 5 6 9 9 8 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 4 8 Histogram 5.4 Ulrike Heider, Germany; notes -5, total 68 sec. 4 7 6 4 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 5.5 Ulrike Heider, Germany; notes 99-5, total 8 sec. 7 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5

559 Histogram 6. Andrew Smith, UK; notes -8, total 8 sec. 6 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 5 Histogram 6. Andrew Smith, UK; notes -5, total sec. 4 8 6 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 6. Andrew Smith, UK; notes -8, total 9 sec. 5 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 6.4 Andrew Smith, UK; notes -5, total 66 sec. 6 5 4 8 7 7 7 6 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 6.5 Andrew Smith, UK; notes 99-5, total sec. 9 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5

56 Histogram 7. John Rowlands-Pritchard, UK; notes -8, total 8 sec. 8 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 5 Histogram 7. John Rowlands-Pritchard, UK; notes -5, total sec. 7 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 7. John Rowlands-Pritchard, UK; notes -8, total 7 sec. 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 7.4 John Rowlands-Pritchard, UK; notes -5, total 6 sec. 8 9 9 7 5 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 7.5 John Rowlands-Pritchard, UK; notes 99-5, total 7 sec. 7 6 8 5 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5

56 Histogram 8. John Alsdatt, USA; notes -8, total 7 sec. 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 8. John Alsdatt, USA; notes -5, total sec. 4 4 5 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 8. John Alsdatt, USA; notes -8, total 7 sec. 7 7 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 8.4 John Alsdatt, USA; notes -5, total 59 sec. 6 7 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 8.5 John Alsdatt, USA; notes 99-5, total 6 sec. 8 5 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5

56 5 Histogram 9. Marja Korkala, Finland; notes -8, total sec. 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 9. Marja Korkala, Finland; notes -5, total 8 sec. 8 5 5 6 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 9. Marja Korkala, Finland; notes -8, total 5 sec. 5 6 6 4 8 6 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 9.4 Marja Korkala, Finland; notes -5, total 8 sec. 6 8 8 7 9 6 7 5 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 9.5 Marja Korkala, Finland; notes 99-5, total sec. 9 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5

56 Histogram. Kerry McCarthy, USA; notes -8, total 8 sec. 5 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram. Kerry McCarthy, USA; notes -5, total 7 sec. 9 8 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram. Kerry McCarthy, USA; notes -8, total 4 sec. 7 7 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram.4 Kerry McCarthy, USA; notes -5, total 7 sec. 4 9 6 5 8 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram.5 Kerry McCarthy, USA; notes 99-5, total 8 sec. 7 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5

564 Histogram. Indrek Laos, Estonia; notes -8, total 7 sec. 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram. Indrek Laos, Estonia; notes -5, total sec. 9 7 6 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram. Indrek Laos, Estonia; notes -8, total 6 sec. 8 4 9 4 6 4 6 4 5 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram.4 Indrek Laos, Estonia; notes -5, total 6 sec. 9 8 5 4 6 8 6 7 7 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram.5 Indrek Laos, Estonia; notes 99-5, total 9 sec. 7 6 8 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5

565 Histogram. Toivo Tulev, Estonia; notes -8, total 8 sec. 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram. Toivo Tulev, Estonia; notes -5, total sec. 9 7 5 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram. Toivo Tulev, Estonia; notes -8, total 7 sec. 4 5 6 4 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram.4 Toivo Tulev, Estonia; notes -5, total 59 sec. 8 7 7 6 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram.5 Toivo Tulev, Estonia; notes 99-5, total 5 sec. 7 8 7 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5

566 Histogram. Tõnis Kaumann, Estonia; notes -8, total 8 sec. 6 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram. Tõnis Kaumann, Estonia; notes -5, total sec. 4 8 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 9 Histogram. Tõnis Kaumann, Estonia; notes -8, total 5 sec. 5 6 6 8 4 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram.4 Tõnis Kaumann, Estonia; notes -5, total 56 sec. 9 6 6 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram.5 Tõnis Kaumann, Estonia; notes 99-5, total 4 sec. 8 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5

567 Histogram 4. Dominique Minier, Canada; notes -8, total 9 sec. 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 4. Dominique Minier, Canada; notes -5, total sec. 6 5 5 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 5. Dominique Minier, Canada; notes -8, total 5 sec. 9 6 7 4 5 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 5 6 9 Histogram 4.4 Dominique Minier, Canada; notes -5, total 87 sec. 8 6 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 4.5 Dominique Minier, Canada; notes 99-5, total 6 sec. 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5

568 Histogram 5. Eerik Jõks, Estonia; notes -8, total 9 sec. 6 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 5. Eerik Jõks, Estonia; notes -5, total 4 sec. 9 8 8 5 6 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 5. Eerik Jõks, Estonia; notes -8, total 9 sec. 5 9 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 5.4 Eerik Jõks, Estonia; notes -5, total 65 sec. 8 4 6 7 9 5 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 Histogram 5.5 Eerik Jõks, Estonia; notes 99-5, total 9 sec. 6 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 5 5 5 5 4 45 5

569 Appendix 48 Table 6 (TOA) Lengths of the notes of the Gradual Haec dies in performance of 5 solo performers In this appendix are the lengths of all notes and breaths of 5 solo performances of the Gradual Haec dies. All values are in milliseconds. On every page, the names of the performers are repeated for better observation qualities. In the first row, there is the text of the Gradual. If a syllable is appears on more than one subsequent pages, the syllable is marked for example mus for the first page and mus on the following page. In the second row are the numbers of the notes, as they appear also in the transcription of the Gradual Haec dies in the Appendix 46, vol, 5 and in the chapter A study of temporal structure and some other features of performance of MSLM, using, as examples, 5 solo performances of the Gradual Haec dies (vol page 55). The firs breath is for some performers, because it was so silent that it was not detectable on the recording. The table is highlighted with several colours. If the value of a note or a breathing is. Notes that include SNOP, which is caused by a repercussive neume element. Notes that include SNOP, which is by a succession of particular neume elements. Breathing.

57 Haec di () Name br 4 5 6 7 8 9 br Kadri Hunt 5 97 8 5 5 94 49 48 57 65 468 Lauri Jõeleht 59 98 66 6 77 84 87 46 44 7 78 Eve Kopli 46 89 7 6 7 7 67 57 46 4 Lilian Langsepp 849 4 469 65 66 64 6 56 47 5 Maile Nairis 75 76 69 9 9 6 49 44 699 7 Jean Pascal Ollivry 48 78 9 477 5 9 6 Peeter Perens 975 49 47 76 49 99 46 5 46 5 7 Maria Staak 78 869 85 67 75 49 4 76 476 68 Jaan Eik Tulve 86 4 97 69 9 4 4 8 57 57 55 6 Riho Ridbek 88 4 4 5 84 5 448 6 44 89 Taivo Niitvägi 85 656 496 5 458 55 56 5 445 57 6 Mike Forbster 985 9 9 85 94 89 6 69 448 84 4 Chris Helfrich 98 57 56 77 8 85 566 447 Columba Kelly 75 47 9 74 9 4 8 4 44 57 Gereon van Boesschoten 66 84 4 46 67 49 8 8 8 467 4 Godehard Joppich 74 7 9 4 58 89 55 79 6 44 868 Guntars Pranis 67 7 549 69 54 6 6 76 46 95 86 Hilkka Liisa Vuori 99 46 587 89 4 56 768 5 646 796 74 4 4 Iegor Reznikoff 68 544 89 4 55 5 54 59 865 95 96 568 6 Martin Quesnel 88 7 7 55 4 7 7 44 56 95 4 5 Richard Crocker 96 885 5 8 9 79 94 55 9 9 4 Richard Rice 86 875 5 7 4 9 55 7 77 5 Lydia Stritzl 6 746 67 59 7 4 478 49 58 574 96 44 Tim Pehta 95 4 8 94 6 66 45 47 448 44 97 Ulrike Heider 68 7 469 5 5 45 848 8 498 9 6 Andrew Smith 46 857 9 57 6 6 6 4 5 9 45 John Rowlands Pritchard 87 45 54 6 84 8 59 6 5 47 John Alsdatt 554 567 54 4 9 6 8 64 55 57 Marja Korkala 7 89 67 5 67 466 654 498 65 468 459 Kerry McCarthy 68 47 8 7 4 68 49 7 8 4 Indrek Laos 686 89 66 64 67 8 9 547 48 65 47 Toivo Tulev 8 87 64 54 5 5 6 46 648 44 Tõnis Kaumann 97 74 6 58 44 86 78 8 686 9 8 Dominique Minier 6 674 48 74 45 4 89 87 796 469 Eerik Jõks 86 47 57 7 88 85 46 4 7

57 di () es quam fe Name 4 5 6 7 8 br 9 Kadri Hunt 66 9 84 4 76 44 559 6 546 98 775 65 Lauri Jõeleht 94 45 9 9 5 47 6 654 564 6 46 Eve Kopli 54 79 88 6 45 9 77 69 6 64 564 Lilian Langsepp 5 8 6 76 9 4 4 67 54 65 55 45 Maile Nairis 5 5 8 8 494 54 74 64 94 79 Jean Pascal Ollivry 7 88 9 66 46 57 88 4 68 7 9 Peeter Perens 44 85 5 56 75 66 69 788 75 66 59 Maria Staak 45 54 4 55 864 84 767 8 Jaan Eik Tulve 88 8 55 8 47 95 674 55 64 84 665 Riho Ridbek 47 8 464 66 99 6 6 Taivo Niitvägi 64 56 46 5 46 47 4 74 96 8 485 Mike Forbster 5 88 8 88 67 56 48 47 6 488 469 Chris Helfrich 4 4 54 4 99 748 465 5 585 44 Columba Kelly 67 86 6 454 9 45 94 69 87 55 46 47 Gereon van Boesschoten 44 45 44 79 8 4 58 54 5 96 Godehard Joppich 6 5 7 74 767 758 84 599 6 458 44 99 Guntars Pranis 86 5 46 75 5 698 844 56 588 49 544 4 Hilkka Liisa Vuori 8 56 4 85 6 74 95 6 755 495 569 57 Iegor Reznikoff 75 84 5 85 478 6 54 5 85 48 76 Martin Quesnel 88 5 84 78 5 454 88 79 555 98 84 7 Richard Crocker 68 8 4 5 5 5 75 54 78 5 896 Richard Rice 44 58 48 79 44 54 596 78 79 Lydia Stritzl 98 9 46 49 5 784 57 88 58 594 Tim Pehta 6 56 99 76 68 5 69 6 658 59 Ulrike Heider 44 84 9 4 496 64 554 4 44 94 Andrew Smith 77 55 7 4 68 44 98 5 4 7 767 6 John Rowlands Pritchard 45 57 7 64 78 87 89 54 48 87 59 69 John Alsdatt 47 5 67 54 87 85 56 456 7 46 6 Marja Korkala 5 47 66 6 64 97 89 56 66 49 67 Kerry McCarthy 68 49 45 45 496 97 54 9 Indrek Laos 9 97 86 44 9 7 484 47 46 868 Toivo Tulev 47 75 7 487 54 7 554 44 6 5 Tõnis Kaumann 486 8 86 79 467 98 74 488 48 476 68 Dominique Minier 664 9 48 66 97 559 455 59 648 79 87 Eerik Jõks 4 9 85 97 69 9 7 674 56 8 684 57

57 cit Name 4 5 6 7 8 9 br Kadri Hunt 597 6 7 7 7 65 96 79 7 Lauri Jõeleht 57 49 57 7 4 45 98 6 68 476 Eve Kopli 88 74 5 49 8 8 77 77 9 Lilian Langsepp 5 46 74 47 6 48 7 86 9 47 Maile Nairis 84 7 89 4 59 4 67 57 Jean Pascal Ollivry 44 9 47 48 58 94 487 46 Peeter Perens 469 49 8 9 8 98 7 85 64 Maria Staak 6 88 5 86 8 95 Jaan Eik Tulve 5 4 8 76 98 69 4 9 Riho Ridbek 547 46 94 95 49 97 4 4 5 48 Taivo Niitvägi 788 487 595 59 69 59 56 5 4 Mike Forbster 4 57 86 9 9 5 47 Chris Helfrich 55 4 94 5 4 8 8 475 Columba Kelly 559 644 8 77 696 45 56 496 6 99 Gereon van Boesschoten 54 76 66 57 8 468 4 45 58 47 Godehard Joppich 66 5 5 589 45 457 6 75 757 55 Guntars Pranis 46 49 6 88 87 5 95 7 558 84 Hilkka Liisa Vuori 565 55 5 79 56 98 44 46 97 95 Iegor Reznikoff 98 5 645 87 67 6 679 45 Martin Quesnel 59 97 7 9 64 5 8 48 4 Richard Crocker 595 47 6 5 6 8 8 Richard Rice 84 84 4 67 49 495 98 4 Lydia Stritzl 498 456 98 46 4 486 4 54 499 Tim Pehta 47 4 4 58 9 79 677 Ulrike Heider 54 66 46 4 45 6 9 88 465 699 Andrew Smith 8 57 9 7 87 588 66 64 John Rowlands Pritchard 8 54 56 86 6 9 5 45 5 94 John Alsdatt 5 8 6 87 56 45 8 46 86 5 Marja Korkala 56 54 4 466 7 78 84 64 Kerry McCarthy 7 9 95 9 55 44 5 77 Indrek Laos 5 4 77 79 479 96 94 766 58 Toivo Tulev 54 6 6 7 8 8 95 84 69 86 Tõnis Kaumann 899 8 8 9 55 94 789 Dominique Minier 94 5 45 546 58 49 57 85 6 Eerik Jõks 89 58 98 6 45 4 47 846

57 Do mi nus () Name 4 5 6 7 8 9 4 4 4 br 4 44 Kadri Hunt 4 66 666 7 64 65 565 568 48 4 685 85 Lauri Jõeleht 5 4 55 4 45 9 7 9 57 44 57 Eve Kopli 87 64 45 6 96 5 86 8 6 4 99 8 Lilian Langsepp 74 4 44 5 58 459 5 4 9 4 76 7 6 Maile Nairis 445 7 59 85 54 46 6 7 4 58 75 4 Jean Pascal Ollivry 9 5 4 68 9 6 58 58 58 489 565 59 47 Peeter Perens 86 67 65 48 47 857 575 78 64 77 57 6 Maria Staak 457 48 6 8 58 556 64 775 7 64 Jaan Eik Tulve 457 44 6 54 8 54 56 7 9 44 965 7 Riho Ridbek 7 4 98 794 858 5 5 88 59 49 Taivo Niitvägi 646 58 549 5 475 58 664 457 67 54 556 55 Mike Forbster 7 54 44 7 46 96 645 76 8 96 85 6 Chris Helfrich 468 49 75 4 7 74 7 65 9 485 6 446 85 85 Columba Kelly 44 95 47 4 999 4 7 94 66 98 Gereon van Boesschoten 554 89 98 944 87 79 49 69 7 48 7 Godehard Joppich 6 69 878 54 57 744 87 869 54 69 58 47 44 Guntars Pranis 4 5 87 44 7 9 5 449 7 48 66 48 Hilkka Liisa Vuori 78 48 798 55 56 696 8 69 59 54 878 45 5 Iegor Reznikoff 78 78 58 95 545 4 77 45 85 7 4 57 Martin Quesnel 477 454 88 485 44 66 9 4 49 4 69 4 89 Richard Crocker 9 4 67 9 5 7 54 56 7 6 49 8 Richard Rice 645 458 79 69 4 87 47 498 79 47 46 Lydia Stritzl 49 49 6 7 49 9 95 65 4 59 668 7 47 Tim Pehta 576 6 48 454 45 6 84 665 87 7 Ulrike Heider 568 5 9 7 447 456 458 67 4 6 95 8 Andrew Smith 9 46 64 6 99 88 44 55 4 54 9 77 9 John Rowlands Pritchard 5 94 49 478 9 85 585 4 56 7 55 67 John Alsdatt 47 8 8 594 5 4 49 758 46 9 87 44 Marja Korkala 7 49 45 88 66 47 545 59 7 59 6 7 Kerry McCarthy 48 48 45 78 477 968 48 44 948 46 67 Indrek Laos 59 57 4 77 595 489 47 5 6 8 445 Toivo Tulev 49 5 565 79 4 77 668 8 8 77 4 8 Tõnis Kaumann 99 45 446 9 4 8 76 754 5 76 86 58 5 Dominique Minier 67 486 57 8 955 5 9 469 599 Eerik Jõks 84 99 4 84 585 66 457 7

574 nus () ex sul te () Name 45 46 47 48 49 5 br 5 5 5 54 br Kadri Hunt 87 48 54 459 575 79 987 448 545 549 9 Lauri Jõeleht 44 8 7 489 488 648 585 59 47 5 Eve Kopli 6 5 69 46 85 68 5 4 6 7 Lilian Langsepp 56 486 9 56 7 9 49 68 48 545 4 Maile Nairis 79 69 47 446 5 999 49 67 6 7 Jean Pascal Ollivry 98 47 59 45 4 96 94 8 8 445 7 Peeter Perens 56 98 5 5 68 4 68 44 474 69 Maria Staak 479 44 89 5 5 489 5 Jaan Eik Tulve 8 49 478 59 654 4 88 488 6 Riho Ridbek 46 49 44 7 489 6 74 56 47 55 8 Taivo Niitvägi 557 567 56 497 6 4 68 46 596 68 5 Mike Forbster 6 84 6 7 48 86 7 45 48 7 Chris Helfrich 88 8 444 46 49 747 9 57 46 7 Columba Kelly 8 68 46 99 85 7 9 4 8 Gereon van Boesschoten 47 499 57 497 6 79 96 4 59 98 44 Godehard Joppich 67 787 798 854 95 7 69 6 59 476 Guntars Pranis 56 5 585 474 9 7 678 66 469 97 94 Hilkka Liisa Vuori 9 44 7 96 499 744 45 895 77 877 58 Iegor Reznikoff 9 7 459 5 67 65 447 895 59 Martin Quesnel 9 4 48 486 955 944 95 468 484 4 9 Richard Crocker 6 788 4 87 89 86 55 5 Richard Rice 65 96 97 84 5 89 9 97 Lydia Stritzl 6 4 59 44 677 99 7 479 468 44 69 Tim Pehta 99 58 4 6 67 85 68 6 67 6 Ulrike Heider 69 88 7 94 9 599 58 588 454 4 9 Andrew Smith 8 4 448 4 64 496 56 67 5 John Rowlands Pritchard 5 44 5 844 47 84 4 464 569 4 John Alsdatt 7 59 59 596 5 5 657 9 99 99 5 Marja Korkala 476 447 466 6 46 59 8 57 84 59 67 Kerry McCarthy 76 999 9 8 7 68 9 56 56 Indrek Laos 4 7 45 5 69 89 558 45 65 Toivo Tulev 5 7 54 58 65 78 84 49 59 486 8 Tõnis Kaumann 95 46 48 44 557 77 47 46 558 48 5 Dominique Minier 56 8 5 8 5 54 49 6 87 Eerik Jõks 46 8 44 7 79 65 84 4 55 544 4

575 te () Name 55 56 57 58 59 6 6 6 br 6 64 br 65 66 67 Kadri Hunt 6 6 8 58 99 55 689 7 6 5 Lauri Jõeleht 88 7 7 6 5 449 449 44 46 64 5 Eve Kopli 97 6 4 95 6 9 9 447 45 8 4 7 Lilian Langsepp 57 9 49 9 555 8 47 8 9 88 97 Maile Nairis 9 5 48 8 7 5 4 575 48 85 5 66 Jean Pascal Ollivry 77 7 8 86 49 8 8 47 499 56 8 69 64 Peeter Perens 78 95 9 49 69 46 887 554 77 56 4 48 6 Maria Staak 5 9 44 56 4 699 5 9 7 8 Jaan Eik Tulve 4 6 6 5 6 76 8 578 748 84 5 55 Riho Ridbek 4 4 67 44 756 647 75 59 9 9 49 Taivo Niitvägi 5 54 4 65 56 574 5 4 47 579 56 47 58 49 Mike Forbster 66 59 7 7 4 458 658 89 5 48 86 Chris Helfrich 94 7 6 5 8 4 44 4 678 474 44 9 Columba Kelly 7 96 8 9 6 49 7 765 44 56 4 Gereon van Boesschoten 6 4 6 49 47 49 67 5 458 7 75 76 Godehard Joppich 6 6 8 4 558 444 878 6 9 76 96 47 84 Guntars Pranis 9 6 6 8 57 56 6 78 45 4 4 Hilkka Liisa Vuori 49 49 754 565 4 77 484 89 658 56 68 59 65 Iegor Reznikoff 485 7 9 68 5 7 79 7 5 5 576 5 Martin Quesnel 9 68 44 5 77 9 499 955 68 64 477 45 Richard Crocker 8 4 55 5 75 44 79 4 9 Richard Rice 4 79 47 54 8 547 89 469 6 7 8 Lydia Stritzl 9 447 4 7 7 465 586 454 58 45 8 Tim Pehta 4 95 4 7 44 55 47 674 75 86 6 46 Ulrike Heider 8 7 49 57 6 64 79 48 46 69 4 8 44 Andrew Smith 6 7 68 69 6 5 8 468 4 499 4 47 697 John Rowlands Pritchard 7 7 69 96 49 5 649 4 6 5 4 79 4 7 John Alsdatt 65 98 49 49 47 66 76 87 7 Marja Korkala 6 44 54 466 56 49 644 48 7 66 559 56 85 Kerry McCarthy 6 7 88 5 68 444 9 44 45 48 8 Indrek Laos 68 6 75 94 9 9 67 4 569 7 8 5 Toivo Tulev 4 85 4 58 6 47 6 48 6 86 Tõnis Kaumann 59 4 8 6 5 5 5 694 69 4 77 5 Dominique Minier 7 4 49 447 689 6 674 484 4 48 4 54 55 Eerik Jõks 9 45 4 5 6 7 6 7 9 64 4

576 mus () Name 68 69 7 7 br 7 7 br 74 br 75 br 76 br Kadri Hunt 47 9 7 44 58 79 65 6 Lauri Jõeleht 47 44 49 4 5 44 45 Eve Kopli 84 78 86 6 6 56 44 Lilian Langsepp 49 9 94 5 77 9 9 69 Maile Nairis 4 77 8 8 7 456 45 6 Jean Pascal Ollivry 9 64 88 6 5 8 89 8 474 Peeter Perens 55 44 95 84 89 47 Maria Staak 565 7 86 544 8 94 77 Jaan Eik Tulve 447 7 8 64 4 9 86 4 Riho Ridbek 5 6 98 5 4 455 9 476 Taivo Niitvägi 55 47 56 478 484 65 46 9 68 Mike Forbster 7 58 8 4 48 44 45 9 Chris Helfrich 88 44 9 6 54 648 68 47 95 598 Columba Kelly 48 4 94 6 48 6 47 5 99 75 Gereon van Boesschoten 54 5 5 49 6 44 85 44 9 Godehard Joppich 47 664 46 64 644 55 555 88 94 Guntars Pranis 47 75 6 7 45 66 49 48 Hilkka Liisa Vuori 654 7 5 85 8 76 79 6 8 49 Iegor Reznikoff 64 65 44 6 5 877 655 58 58 Martin Quesnel 6 45 6 4 48 44 8 5 64 Richard Crocker 44 44 7 45 8 87 67 747 Richard Rice 48 5 44 49 8 49 966 Lydia Stritzl 548 479 6 45 6 44 48 46 464 Tim Pehta 54 66 5 45 49 568 4 7 9 69 Ulrike Heider 6 64 5 76 9 54 84 55 448 Andrew Smith 8 69 7 49 4 5 4 4 76 John Rowlands Pritchard 44 9 7 95 97 4 4 7 John Alsdatt 77 8 44 7 6 57 445 55 54 6 Marja Korkala 45 74 584 7 67 47 4 75 449 Kerry McCarthy 48 5 78 4 4 857 446 94 Indrek Laos 55 9 95 4 55 9 86 Toivo Tulev 5 9 9 4 45 5 48 Tõnis Kaumann 7 98 48 8 55 6 4 5 97 Dominique Minier 76 4 66 449 8 47 55 6 Eerik Jõks 56 7 65 59 49 6 8 8 58

577 mus () et Name 77 78 79 8 8 8 8 br 84 85 86 br Kadri Hunt 594 5 65 8 586 85 684 9 78 484 74 Lauri Jõeleht 56 99 98 4 89 7 86 94 664 45 Eve Kopli 479 48 5 49 566 8 59 846 87 Lilian Langsepp 54 58 74 44 58 8 6 58 5 5 47 Maile Nairis 47 85 46 79 669 76 64 58 44 Jean Pascal Ollivry 8 6 55 8 68 4 7 88 54 86 94 Peeter Perens 7 9 48 59 447 95 889 59 47 4 Maria Staak 9 75 78 54 4 67 655 685 74 6 Jaan Eik Tulve 77 79 48 64 58 757 48 96 475 9 65 Riho Ridbek 6 48 44 65 59 45 486 85 644 6 8 Taivo Niitvägi 5 5 496 46 55 69 98 7 66 57 87 Mike Forbster 77 85 89 45 57 55 66 765 45 64 9 Chris Helfrich 5 4 76 44 484 7 687 49 76 Columba Kelly 48 9 4 88 485 9 88 77 54 64 445 Gereon van Boesschoten 47 6 75 45 49 546 5 446 46 4 5 Godehard Joppich 766 98 58 54 6 885 77 977 765 484 Guntars Pranis 44 7 66 475 47 959 6 77 545 98 Hilkka Liisa Vuori 75 55 49 6 76 47 4 84 4 49 7 Iegor Reznikoff 45 744 75 76 49 95 8 4 74 458 49 Martin Quesnel 4 9 47 4 6 6 75 788 45 47 95 Richard Crocker 58 5 4 6 4 5 4 7 666 65 Richard Rice 48 87 48 577 56 4 75 766 7 98 Lydia Stritzl 7 4 68 58 59 76 556 4 5 6 Tim Pehta 7 55 5 54 75 45 77 777 64 Ulrike Heider 5 5 76 47 46 455 47 559 58 8 Andrew Smith 8 5 44 8 58 664 48 677 John Rowlands Pritchard 4 69 5 44 4 85 655 548 7 8 John Alsdatt 59 66 9 48 68 67 56 48 96 Marja Korkala 489 759 745 56 478 67 75 56 474 75 Kerry McCarthy 6 474 446 6 48 7 66 7 9 Indrek Laos 54 7 6 46 6 85 5 88 54 Toivo Tulev 644 8 9 6 79 588 486 99 588 78 Tõnis Kaumann 57 6 6 8 68 6 9 999 5 55 9 Dominique Minier 4 5 54 65 5 67 66 58 9 Eerik Jõks 445 48 5 5 474 87 7 98 4 7

578 lae te mur Name 87 88 89 9 9 9 9 94 95 96 97 98 br Kadri Hunt 49 7 46 5 94 9 8 556 96 5 46 Lauri Jõeleht 57 67 4 4 5 58 4 57 78 479 96 646 Eve Kopli 96 55 74 8 5 9 5 65 489 4 45 485 Lilian Langsepp 486 57 5 89 8 7 65 49 59 948 59 Maile Nairis 567 66 8 474 44 65 47 4 69 45 58 Jean Pascal Ollivry 97 74 6 7 5 56 99 49 464 7 5 75 4 Peeter Perens 99 66 8 476 95 56 49 5 5 4 876 Maria Staak 445 7 45 54 65 98 594 79 47 6 98 Jaan Eik Tulve 48 44 88 8 85 54 86 44 5 5 58 95 685 Riho Ridbek 9 4 5 46 9 66 55 95 8 998 5 Taivo Niitvägi 77 467 44 688 5 557 56 55 7 4 49 54 59 Mike Forbster 58 78 7 59 97 54 94 49 57 76 8 Chris Helfrich 94 7 48 45 57 5 88 64 4 68 7 49 Columba Kelly 44 77 6 9 49 45 64 68 9 84 98 Gereon van Boesschoten 47 45 84 45 4 45 7 5 66 77 5 85 77 Godehard Joppich 55 4 4 67 765 79 647 58 668 8 468 88 465 Guntars Pranis 55 59 4 6 6 7 59 4 668 74 458 64 99 Hilkka Liisa Vuori 675 55 54 99 47 4 498 547 5 64 84 Iegor Reznikoff 495 89 9 74 6 6 445 557 678 4 46 Martin Quesnel 97 98 46 79 55 6 5 4 69 45 7 9 8 Richard Crocker 48 48 46 56 5 88 6 5 9 47 9 49 Richard Rice 5 44 7 84 46 44 6 4 47 9 64 Lydia Stritzl 6 579 49 6 54 479 56 57 444 Tim Pehta 47 77 67 95 8 4 6 67 4 58 95 44 Ulrike Heider 58 5 9 545 445 5 47 4 56 46 656 7 69 Andrew Smith 54 6 55 5 48 59 49 47 67 64 54 78 John Rowlands Pritchard 9 8 4 4 45 8 74 5 8 7 4 764 559 John Alsdatt 45 87 4 5 4 45 447 96 4 85 595 Marja Korkala 5 7 65 75 565 9 47 47 45 6 85 685 Kerry McCarthy 58 8 8 494 4 7 47 49 47 8 Indrek Laos 499 4 6 8 95 5 74 49 67 8 6 Toivo Tulev 544 75 6 478 44 5 5 9 6 89 8 Tõnis Kaumann 96 4 98 94 7 6 5 9 4 84 57 5 5 Dominique Minier 4 4 44 455 49 84 456 6 54 464 Eerik Jõks 59 44 45 48 49 59 6 85 476 87 449 5

579 in e a () Name 99 4 5 6 7 8 9 br Kadri Hunt 49 6 67 44 55 444 6 5 4 4 78 78 Lauri Jõeleht 58 48 46 8 45 8 89 87 6 69 4 Eve Kopli 9 7 49 68 5 4 9 68 56 65 Lilian Langsepp 6 5 46 84 84 5 49 5 46 6 46 Maile Nairis 9 78 449 6 8 49 66 57 44 6 5 8 Jean Pascal Ollivry 4 69 444 9 8 4 66 5 46 Peeter Perens 756 47 95 76 44 45 85 84 7 6 9 9 6 Maria Staak 58 5 49 579 44 47 7 46 8 46 45 Jaan Eik Tulve 66 499 6 4 468 75 88 65 5 6 7 45 Riho Ridbek 5 66 4 4 686 9 5 69 6 4 Taivo Niitvägi 545 5 59 48 558 455 548 5 66 55 56 9 9 Mike Forbster 4 9 56 665 5 8 6 6 99 9 4 Chris Helfrich 55 77 47 66 9 5 8 57 8 4 45 78 Columba Kelly 9 6 7 56 55 9 7 5 5 67 Gereon van Boesschoten 48 66 49 6 5 9 98 75 56 9 Godehard Joppich 49 4 6 58 75 898 7 68 89 599 478 7 Guntars Pranis 7 46 9 9 6 49 49 7 5 77 Hilkka Liisa Vuori 64 4 8 44 48 8 55 5 5 78 58 86 49 Iegor Reznikoff 44 5 57 48 96 56 48 44 48 494 574 65 99 Martin Quesnel 46 44 84 445 6 9 7 87 47 855 Richard Crocker 49 46 6 4 5 7 4 97 7 7 Richard Rice 66 5 44 8 4 47 69 99 8 45 Lydia Stritzl 8 4 65 47 59 564 7 5 49 4 97 59 Tim Pehta 6 8 78 9 7 97 95 48 46 67 6 68 Ulrike Heider 498 48 564 87 8 49 5 89 5 66 4 84 8 Andrew Smith 58 45 5 6 47 576 88 94 48 58 554 6 John Rowlands Pritchard 588 76 99 77 44 44 4 96 8 555 57 John Alsdatt 48 7 6 4 45 69 74 4 4 4 7 Marja Korkala 65 685 65 46 69 8 68 66 48 7 6 94 88 Kerry McCarthy 448 44 86 49 4 8 49 4 97 6 58 Indrek Laos 97 97 446 64 94 4 8 99 6 579 Toivo Tulev 9 4 9 85 44 4 77 5 7 54 Tõnis Kaumann 44 7 7 4 6 8 95 5 8 4 54 Dominique Minier 565 5 6 464 755 47 46 47 74 6 5 44 Eerik Jõks 4 4 8 7 445 5 8 8 9 8 9 99

58 a () Name 4 5 6 7 8 9 br Kadri Hunt 96 5 46 7 4 44 45 49 66 78 9 Lauri Jõeleht 4 7 9 59 584 9 9 98 7 48 4 Eve Kopli 6 68 6 89 8 7 46 84 75 7 567 7 47 Lilian Langsepp 4 8 9 67 76 47 64 98 8 9 6 Maile Nairis 5 84 4 9 48 569 6 49 597 98 7 Jean Pascal Ollivry 97 76 58 6 9 9 4 68 58 8 46 4 Peeter Perens 6 48 4 58 95 45 4 4 46 47 5 6 Maria Staak 84 6 56 88 6 8 54 47 44 Jaan Eik Tulve 96 484 57 8 4 9 5 77 8 47 Riho Ridbek 646 8 9 6 48 9 48 746 57 46 Taivo Niitvägi 54 6 6 47 569 75 55 564 59 Mike Forbster 9 9 7 4 87 7 69 5 7 757 7 Chris Helfrich 7 7 98 9 89 75 6 7 4 64 4 44 Columba Kelly 4 7 65 6 9 54 47 46 5 87 Gereon van Boesschoten 4 8 44 97 75 4 75 48 895 744 64 9 Godehard Joppich 99 49 47 54 64 54 5 8 88 655 964 Guntars Pranis 8 74 47 4 4 48 48 44 54 45 696 4 6 Hilkka Liisa Vuori 969 666 67 5 65 5 55 445 974 694 669 78 55 Iegor Reznikoff 5 5 677 44 466 8 49 46 56 4 69 746 Martin Quesnel 9 4 6 6 48 8 49 77 Richard Crocker 6 9 55 9 75 7 7 6 59 96 4 Richard Rice 75 9 7 6 64 4 66 4 77 54 55 Lydia Stritzl 55 56 54 5 55 45 48 9 46 58 7 44 Tim Pehta 47 5 54 4 44 7 4 579 75 6 47 Ulrike Heider 5 7 48 4 7 84 5 54 69 8 659 9 Andrew Smith 466 54 96 94 97 7 554 68 64 447 576 John Rowlands Pritchard 455 4 55 89 5 6 75 84 75 57 6 4 John Alsdatt 59 6 44 56 9 44 4 48 85 5 55 Marja Korkala 747 786 5 56 56 76 468 66 95 696 6 456 646 Kerry McCarthy 74 64 49 99 4 7 69 6 86 4 44 Indrek Laos 49 45 8 6 45 88 4 67 4 57 47 Toivo Tulev 89 66 6 8 76 44 64 9 49 Tõnis Kaumann 48 5 5 54 76 4 655 67 Dominique Minier 6 476 96 49 9 5 457 46 57 876 574 8 Eerik Jõks 4 8 479 78 85 79 87 48 955 89 49

58 a () Name br 4 5 6 br 7 8 9 br Kadri Hunt 6 5 4 74 59 5 46 78 Lauri Jõeleht 87 77 47 8 49 66 5 5 964 Eve Kopli 5 8 7 468 84 8 57 6 76 657 Lilian Langsepp 4 544 6 5 75 95 84 79 47 Maile Nairis 566 69 47 7 69 6 477 5 Jean Pascal Ollivry 68 85 66 44 8 445 48 69 6 76 Peeter Perens 697 4 47 75 47 87 8 64 7 Maria Staak 67 9 587 86 67 85 7 49 44 76 Jaan Eik Tulve 799 4 4 48 86 6 9 55 544 645 Riho Ridbek 897 45 96 99 598 794 88 5 75 9 87 Taivo Niitvägi 5 56 469 5 477 64 56 Mike Forbster 8 87 94 7 94 88 96 64 8 884 Chris Helfrich 85 68 8 7 74 4 96 48 76 877 Columba Kelly 6 4 98 6 96 4 5 46 445 7 54 Gereon van Boesschoten 697 7 74 99 79 47 46 69 85 Godehard Joppich 7 495 48 4 64 4 6 54 6 67 Guntars Pranis 59 8 6 5 4 495 66 798 Hilkka Liisa Vuori 89 474 65 699 4 7 4 94 765 48 Iegor Reznikoff 54 5 8 96 68 5 46 597 58 Martin Quesnel 5 57 8 9 7 75 98 75 586 47 Richard Crocker 9 55 4 7 47 64 97 67 8 78 9 Richard Rice 67 6 767 778 77 79 9 4 585 8 Lydia Stritzl 47 44 4 577 48 7 75 4 58 689 Tim Pehta 78 69 459 845 59 6 75 85 Ulrike Heider 68 7 54 455 58 94 69 56 Andrew Smith 67 7 8 48 6 58 44 64 75 John Rowlands Pritchard 4 466 48 88 67 99 7 47 57 John Alsdatt 888 48 67 86 6 78 7 78 8 75 Marja Korkala 647 54 46 54 4 4 47 9 68 68 Kerry McCarthy 64 9 78 66 44 5 49 46 46 974 Indrek Laos 554 8 485 75 694 4 7 7 5 44 6 Toivo Tulev 585 6 5 57 867 8 99 54 587 94 Tõnis Kaumann 547 4 97 74 8 7 5 69 569 77 Dominique Minier 956 46 76 7 876 5 7 5 496 955 8 Eerik Jõks 46 4 546 99 459 86 97 884

58 a (4) Name 4 5 Kadri Hunt 95 66 467 Lauri Jõeleht 59 5 95 Eve Kopli 446 Lilian Langsepp 474 978 746 Maile Nairis 74 799 648 Jean Pascal Ollivry 5 78 Peeter Perens 4 45 9 Maria Staak 8 8 5 Jaan Eik Tulve 469 69 88 Riho Ridbek 44 544 97 Taivo Niitvägi 4 44 Mike Forbster 48 67 65 Chris Helfrich 88 445 Columba Kelly 5 6 4 Gereon van Boesschoten 585 89 984 Godehard Joppich 8 645 8 Guntars Pranis 44 86 78 Hilkka Liisa Vuori 5 956 76 Iegor Reznikoff 598 695 78 Martin Quesnel 58 95 59 Richard Crocker 9 8 Richard Rice 668 69 47 Lydia Stritzl 55 59 8 Tim Pehta 54 98 775 Ulrike Heider 698 88 446 Andrew Smith 568 7 6 John Rowlands Pritchard 45 67 46 John Alsdatt 64 595 8 Marja Korkala 47 87 8 Kerry McCarthy 56 7 4 Indrek Laos 64 9 Toivo Tulev 59 664 8 Tõnis Kaumann 58 557 Dominique Minier 956 6 Eerik Jõks 4 979 57

58 Appendix 49 Table 68 (additional). Length of the piece with breaths (Length, br), groups according to previous column (Group), length of the piece without breaths (Length, no br), mean note value, and derived mean note value; sorted by length of the piece with breaths. All values, except Group are in milliseconds. Name Length, br Group Length, no br Mean Derived mean Tõnis Kaumann 55 7 5 9 9 88 Eve Kopli 56 7 5 78 86 84 Jean Pascal Ollivry 57 7 54 75 46 46 Mike Forbster 58 55 78 4 4 Guntars Pranis 58 68 55 56 4 4 Toivo Tulev 58 98 55 46 4 4 John Alsdatt 59 55 769 46 4 Maile Nairis 6 47 57 9 44 45 John Rowlands Pritchard 6 84 56 686 4 4 Indrek Laos 6 7 56 589 4 49 Lauri Jõeleht 6 86 59 5 44 47 Lilian Langsepp 6 84 57 898 49 49 Jaan Eik Tulve 6 47 59 45 49 49 Richard Crocker 6 8 59 898 447 444 Kadri Hunt 64 4 6 78 45 45 Tim Pehta 64 459 6 644 449 449 Eerik Jõks 64 68 6 649 449 449 Maria Staak 64 68 59 6 477 48 Chris Helfrich 64 78 59 588 45 44 Peeter Perens 65 5 6 55 445 445 Andrew Smith 66 498 6 767 468 465 Columba Kelly 66 84 6 75 467 467 Ulrike Heider 68 5 6 67 464 464 Riho Ridbek 68 79 6 45 495 47 Gereon van Boesschoten 68 6 76 476 469 Lydia Stritzl 68 59 65 6 48 48 Kerry McCarthy 69 85 64 49 55 476 Richard Rice 7 59 67 555 497 Martin Quesnel 79 955 77 4 57 57 Marja Korkala 8 89 7 899 544 54 Taivo Niitvägi 8 47 7 8 569 544 Dominique Minier 86 95 8 56 66 68 Iegor Reznikoff 87 54 8 49 64 64 Godehard Joppich 98 6 9 4 697 69 Hilkka Liisa Vuori 45 9 48 676 676

584 Appendix 5 Table 69 (additional). Groups formed according to DNC (Group), number of different note categories (DNC), standard deviation (StDev), length of the piece without breaths (Length, no br), mean note value, and derived mean note value; sorted by DNC. Name Group DNC StDev Length, no Derived Mean br (sec) mean John Alsdatt 5 77 55.8 46 4 John Rowlands Pritchard 6 5 56.7 4 4 Lydia Stritzl 6 66 65. 48 48 Taivo Niitvägi 6 98 7.4 569 544 Guntars Pranis 7 9 55.6 4 4 Jean Pascal Ollivry 7 54.8 46 46 Lauri Jõeleht 8 59. 44 47 Lilian Langsepp 9 57.9 49 49 Ulrike Heider 9 66 6.7 464 464 Gereon van Boesschoten 6 6. 476 469 Kadri Hunt 7 6.8 45 45 Mike Forbster 49 55.8 4 4 Peeter Perens 6. 445 445 Toivo Tulev 4 55.4 4 4 Tõnis Kaumann 6 5.4 9 88 Andrew Smith 4 6.8 468 465 Chris Helfrich 5 59.6 45 44 Eerik Jõks 94 6.6 449 449 Indrek Laos 89 56.6 4 49 Jaan Eik Tulve 59. 49 49 Kerry McCarthy 95 64. 55 476 Maile Nairis 9 57.4 44 45 Riho Ridbek 7 6.4 495 47 Tim Pehta 58 6.6 449 449 Columba Kelly 5 6. 467 467 Richard Crocker 59.9 447 444 Richard Rice 67. 555 497 Eve Kopli 5 86 5.8 86 84 Iegor Reznikoff 5 9 8.5 64 64 Marja Korkala 5 69 7.9 544 54 Hilkka Liisa Vuori 6 48 9. 676 676 Maria Staak 6 55 59. 477 48 Godehard Joppich 7 8 9. 697 69 Martin Quesnel 7 68 77. 57 57 Dominique Minier 9 89 8. 66 68

585 Appendix 5 Histograms 5 solo performances of the Gradual Haec dies in partitions of: all notes included; bins with less than three notes excluded; bins with less than five notes excluded. This appendix presents the temporal structure of the recordings in the form of histograms. Every performer has three histograms, each of which is presented in two fashions: () with bars and () with distribution line. The numeration of histograms follows the numeration in Appendix 47. All histograms are equipped with a curve of a normal distribution. On histograms that use distribution line (second histogram in every pair) the vertical line represents the mean and the horizontal line represents the mode. In all histograms, horizontal axis represents milliseconds and vertical axis represents number of notes. At the end of the title of every pair of histograms, there is a value of DNC (number of different note categories). After every pair of histograms, there is a selection of descriptive statistics. The abbreviations have following meaning: N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis Number of notes Range of all notes (longest note shortest note) Length of the shortest note Length of the longest note Length of all notes in milliseconds (without breaths) Mean note value Standard deviation Skewness Kurtosis

586 Histogram.6 Kadri Hunt (all notes); DNC= N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 5 54 78 79 6784 45 7.56 8.4 Histogram.7 Kadri Hunt (bins with less than notes excluded); DNC=

587 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 7 65 78 79 55 98 55.7.4 Histogram.8 Kadri Hunt (bins with less than 5 notes excluded); DNC=9 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 4 45 66 47 75 5.55.89

588 Histogram.6 Lauri Jõeleht (all notes) DNC=8 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 4 77 488 595 44.7 8.6 Histogram.7 Lauri Jõeleht (bins with less than notes excluded); DNC=9

589 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 45 664 46857 84 99.8. Histogram.8 Lauri Jõeleht (bins with less than 5 notes excluded); DNC=7 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 6 4 5 585 444 8 88.68.46

59 Histogram.6 Eve Kopli (all notes); DNC=5 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 4 4 86 578 86 86.4.86 Histogram.7 Eve Kopli (bins with less than notes excluded); DNC=

59 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 9 564 86 65 66 79 54.94. Histogram.8 Eve Kopli (bins with less than 5 notes excluded); DNC= N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 544 6 65 77 5.4.6

59 Histogram 4.6 Lilian Langsepp (all notes); DNC=9 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 5 58 65 746 57898 49.78. Histogram 4.7 Lilian Langsepp (bins with less than notes excluded); DNC=7

59 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 7 5 545 47 6 89.49.8 Histogram 4.8 Lilian Langsepp (bins with less than 5 notes excluded); DNC=7 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 7 5 545 47 6 89.49.8

594 Histogram 5.6 Maile Nairis (all notes); DNC= N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 87 8 5 579 44 9.. Histogram 5.7 Maile Nairis (bins with less than notes excluded); DNC=8

595 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 4 596 799 459 65 6.5.9 Histogram 5.8 Maile Nairis (bins with less than 5 notes excluded); DNC=7 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 94 597 99 5 94.67.9

596 Histogram 6.6 Jean Pascal Ollivry (all notes); DNC=7 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 5 8 96 5475 46. 6.54 Histogram 6.7 Jean Pascal Ollivry (bins with less than notes excluded); DNC=

597 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 5 54 8 75 4547 6 8.. Histogram 6.8 Jean Pascal Ollivry (bins with less than 5 notes excluded); DNC=7 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 4 6 57 95 47 86.49.66

598 Histogram 7.6 Peeter Perens (all notes); DNC= N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 5 58 7 95 655 445. 4.87 Histogram 7.7 Peeter Perens (bins with less than notes excluded); DNC=9

599 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 478 59 77 4777 9 98.68.6 Histogram 7.8 Peeter Perens (bins with less than 5 notes excluded); DNC=6 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 7 59 5 4447 7 6.55.

6 Histogram 8.6 Maria Staak (all notes); DNC=6 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 4 85 46 596 477 55.7 5. Histogram 8.7 Maria Staak (bins with less than notes excluded); DNC=

6 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 7 694 75 869 9987 74 79.6.49 Histogram 8.8 Maria Staak (bins with less than 5 notes excluded); DNC= N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 6 75 775 4659 47 5.4.

6 Histogram 9.6 Jaan Eik Tulve (all notes); DNC= N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 5 66 4 4 5945 49.9 4.4 Histogram 9.7 Jaan Eik Tulve (bins with less than notes excluded); DNC=

6 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 4 757 6 97 4995 97 6..6 Histogram 9.8 Jaan Eik Tulve (bins with less than 5 notes excluded); DNC= N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 8 77 7 58 99 6 99.54.56

64 Histogram.6 Riho Ridbek (all notes); DNC= N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 8 995 97 645 495 7.68 9. Histogram.7 Riho Ridbek (bins with less than notes excluded); DNC=

65 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 7 986 88 58 44 96. 4.64 Histogram.8 Riho Ridbek (bins with less than 5 notes excluded); DNC=6 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 98 97 5 647 766 8 95.6.

66 Histogram.6 Taivo Niitvägi (all notes); DNC=6 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 9 5 9 44 78 569 98.47 8.65 Histogram.7 Taivo Niitvägi (bins with less than notes excluded); DNC=9

67 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 7 54 74 664 54 9.9.8 Histogram.8 Taivo Niitvägi (bins with less than 5 notes excluded); DNC=6 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 7 78 4 688 578 5 6.4.6

68 Histogram.6 Mike Forbster (all notes); DNC= N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 5 96 9 65 5578 4 49. 9.98 Histogram.7 Mike Forbster (bins with less than notes excluded); DNC=7

69 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 6 6 9 58 89 68.4.46 Histogram.8 Mike Forbster (bins with less than 5 notes excluded); DNC= N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 9 9 45 476 9 5.67.

6 Histogram.6 Chris Helfrich (all notes); DNC= N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 445 59588 45 5. 5.4 Histogram.7 Chris Helfrich (bins with less than notes excluded); DNC=

6 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 9 59 7 4657 9 4.5. Histogram.8 Chris Helfrich (bins with less than 5 notes excluded); DNC=7 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 8 46 648 976 68 89.8.9

6 Histogram 4.6 Columba Kelly (all notes); DNC= N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 5 65 55 4 675 467 5.95. Histogram 4.7 Columba Kelly (bins with less than notes excluded); DNC=

6 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 9 55 94 4545 78 94.6 6.48 Histogram 4.8 Columba Kelly (bins with less than 5 notes excluded); DNC=6 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 4 8 496 548 7 74.6.9

64 Histogram 5.6 Gereon van Boesschoten (all notes); DNC= N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 774 984 676 476 6.7.77 Histogram 5.7 Gereon van Boesschoten (bins with less than notes excluded); DNC=9

65 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 8 584 66 85 48568 4.98 5.46 Histogram 5.8 Gereon van Boesschoten (bins with less than 5 notes excluded); DNC=6 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 8 8 66 546 49 88 6.5.6

66 Histogram 6.6 Godehard Joppich (all notes); DNC=7 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 4 874 6 8 94 697 8.6.9 Histogram 6.7 Godehard Joppich (bins with less than notes excluded); DNC=5

67 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 8 98 6 99 77 6 8.76.9 Histogram 6.8 Godehard Joppich (bins with less than 5 notes excluded); DNC= N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 8 98 6 99 69 585 5.89.8

68 Histogram 7.6 Guntars Pranis (all notes); DNC=7 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 5 7 49 86 5556 4 9.8 4.87 Histogram 7.7 Guntars Pranis (bins with less than notes excluded); DNC=

69 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 5 96 6 488 85 56.68 9.65 Histogram 7.8 Guntars Pranis (bins with less than 5 notes excluded); DNC=7 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 4 48 549 9779 49 84.7.6

6 Histogram 8.6 Hilkka Liisa Vuori (all notes); DNC=6 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 5 487 56 744 948 676 48.7 8.48 Histogram 8.7 Hilkka Liisa Vuori (bins with less than notes excluded); DNC=5

6 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 78 56 974 6984 568 8.4.7 Histogram 8.8 Hilkka Liisa Vuori (bins with less than 5 notes excluded); DNC= N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 587 56 84 66 56 54..94

6 Histogram 9.6 Iegor Reznikoff (all notes); DNC=5 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 7 69 95 849 64 9.88. Histogram 9.7 Iegor Reznikoff (bins with less than 5 notes excluded); DNC=4

6 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 897 5 49 69 559 6.9.7 Histogram 9.8 Iegor Reznikoff (bins with less than 5 notes excluded); DNC= N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 4 786 5 7 54655 56 86.9.84

64 Histogram.6 Martin Quesnel (all notes); DNC=7 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 5 94 45 59 774 57 68.9 4.7 Histogram.7 Martin Quesnel (bins with less than notes excluded); DNC=

65 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 957 7 9 58 45 9.5 6.6 Histogram.8 Martin Quesnel (bins with less than 5 notes excluded); DNC=6 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 96 7 7 64 767 9 79..54

66 Histogram.6 Richard Crocker (all notes); DNC= N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 4 6 67 47 59898 447.66.6 Histogram.7 Richard Crocker (bins with less than notes excluded); DNC=

67 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 7 4 67 9 44977 84 6.5 4.7 Histogram.8 Richard Crocker (bins with less than 5 notes excluded); DNC= N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 8 59 997 77..

68 Histogram.6 Richard Rice (all notes); DNC= N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 98 8 47 67 555.4 8.4 Histogram.7 Richard Rice (bins with less than notes excluded); DNC=

69 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 9 874 7 44 567 488 9.8.65 Histogram.8 Richard Rice (bins with less than 5 notes excluded); DNC=8 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 9 569 7 84 4786 44 54.5.8

6 Histogram.6 Lydia Stritzl (all notes); DNC=6 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 5 67 7 8 656 48 66.9 6.4 Histogram.7 Lydia Stritzl (bins with less than notes excluded); DNC=9

6 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 5 49 7 689 5588 447.4.68 Histogram.8 Lydia Stritzl (bins with less than 5 notes excluded); DNC=7 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 7 6 5 445 9..97

6 Histogram 4.6 Tim Pehta (all notes); DNC= N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 5 58 94 775 6644 449 58.68 9.8 Histogram 4.7 Tim Pehta (bins with less than notes excluded); DNC=

6 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 5 4 75 466 85 8.6.5 Histogram 4.8 Tim Pehta (bins with less than 5 notes excluded); DNC=8 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 489 4 69 486 68 5.6.7

64 Histogram 5.6 Ulrike Heider (all notes); DNC=9 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 5 85 5 599 667 464 66.58 7.7 Histogram 5.7 Ulrike Heider (bins with less than notes excluded); DNC=

65 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 6 8 5 496 585 49.54 6.5 Histogram 5.8 Ulrike Heider (bins with less than 5 notes excluded); DNC=9 v N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 9 48 5 698 4597 86 9.8.4

66 Histogram 6.6 Andrew Smith (all); DNC= N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 4 4 6 6767 468 4.78.99 Histogram 6.7 Andrew Smith (bins with less than notes excluded); DNC=

67 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 56 78 49 45 7.88. Histogram 6.8 Andrew Smith (bins with less than 5 notes excluded); DNC= N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 8 475 697 4679 96 5.75.49

68 Histogram 7.6 John Rowlands Prittchard (all notes); DNC=6 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 5 4 69 47 56686 4 5.5.64 Histogram 7.7 John Rowlands Prittchard (bins with less than notes excluded); DNC=9

69 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 6 67 7 844 488 87. 5.6 Histogram 7.8 John Rowlands Prittchard (bins with less than 5 notes excluded); DNC=7 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 9 56 588 4485 77 77.8.

64 Histogram 8.6 John Alsdatt (all notes); DNC=5 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 4 69 8 5 55769 46 77.56 8. Histogram 8.7 John Alsdatt (bins with less than notes excluded); DNC=9

64 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 6 6 57 888 5587 4 7.4 4.46 Histogram 8.8 John Alsdatt (bins with less than 5 notes excluded); DNC=7 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 9 578 57 85 4594 86 7.6 6.5

64 Histogram 9.6 Marja Korkala (all notes); DNC=5 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 4 58 75 7899 544 69.5.59 Histogram 9.7 Marja Korkala (bins with less than notes excluded); DNC=5

64 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 886 6 49 6848 499 88.6.44 Histogram 9.8 Marja Korkala (bins with less than 5 notes excluded); DNC= N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 9 54 5 747 54 47 4..

644 Histogram.6 Kerry McCarthy (all notes); DNC= N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 7 9 496 6449 55 95.7.86 Histogram.7 Kerry McCarthy (bins with less than notes excluded); DNC=8

645 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 7 456 45 8.8 4.45 Histogram.8 Kerry McCarthy (bins with less than 5 notes excluded); DNC=4 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 87 8 494 758 88 46.5.8

646 Histogram.6 Indrek Laos (all notes); DNC= N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 4 55 44 56589 4 89.6 7.54 Histogram.7 Indrek Laos (bins with less than notes excluded); DNC=

647 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 475 67 64 477 59 6.6.59 Histogram.8 Indrek Laos (bins with less than 5 notes excluded); DNC= N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 475 67 64 477 59 6.6.59

648 Histogram.6 Toivo Tulev (all notes); DNC= N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 5 55 85 78 5546 4 4.7 9.67 Histogram.7 Toivo Tulev (bins with less than notes excluded); DNC=

649 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 46 85 648 465 49 9.96. Histogram.8 Toivo Tulev (bins with less than 5 notes excluded); DNC=8 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 6 447 648 4455 49 6.7.4

65 Histogram.6 Tõnis Kaumann (all notes); DNC= N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 4 66 77 59 9 6.49 7.7 Histogram.7 Tõnis Kaumann (bins with less than notes excluded); DNC=

65 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 6 74 898 4 4.5.7 Histogram.8 Tõnis Kaumann (bins with less than 5 notes excluded); DNC=7 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 4 48 5 5 6 9 8.74.7

65 Histogram 4.6 Dominique Minier (all notes); DNC=9 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 4 86 6 6 856 66 89.4 5.57 Histogram 4.7 Dominique Minier (bins with less than notes excluded); DNC=

65 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 895 5 47 5494 54 7.45.8 Histogram 4.8 Dominique Minier (bins with less than 5 notes excluded); DNC=8 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 8 47 5 689 898 47.4.9

654 Histogram 5.6 Eerik Jõks (all notes); DNC= N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 5 7 86 57 6649 449 94.5.6 Histogram 5.7 Eerik Jõks (bins with less than notes excluded); DNC=8

655 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 5 88 59 456 5 94.6.6 Histogram 5.8 Eerik Jõks (bins with less than 5 notes excluded); DNC=7 N Range Min. Max. Sum. (msec) Mean StDev Skewness Kurtosis 4 546 84 45 85.46.55

656 Appendix 5 Table 7 (additional). Number of BNVs, StDev, and L+/L ; sorted by BNV. Name BNV StDev L+/L Lauri Jõeleht L+ Lilian Langsepp L Maile Nairis 9 L+ Jean Pascal Ollivry L+ Peeter Perens L+ Jaan Eik Tulve L+ Taivo Niitvägi 98 L+ Mike Forbster 49 L Columba Kelly 5 L+ Gereon van Boesschoten 6 L+ Guntars Pranis 9 L Lydia Stritzl 66 L+ Ulrike Heider 66 L+ Andrew Smith 4 L John Rowlands Pritchard 5 L+ John Alsdatt 77 L+ Indrek Laos 89 L+ Toivo Tulev 4 L+ Eerik Jõks 94 L+ Kadri Hunt 7 L Eve Kopli 86 L+ Maria Staak 55 L Riho Ridbek 7 L Chris Helfrich 5 L+ Martin Quesnel 68 L Richard Crocker L Richard Rice L+ Tim Pehta 58 L+ Kerry McCarthy 95 L+ Tõnis Kaumann 6 L+ Dominique Minier 89 L+ Godehard Joppich ED 8 L+ Hilkka Liisa Vuori ED 48 L+ Iegor Reznikoff ED 9 L+ Marja Korkala ED 69 L+

657 Appendix 5 Table 7 (additional). Groups of notes of equal duration as perceived by performers; notes 8; sorted by Gr (groups formed on similarity); all values are in milliseconds; sorted by groups that are formed according to similarity. Performer Gr 4 5 6 7 8 9 4 5 6 7 8 Taivo Niitvägi 85 656 496 5 458 55 56 5 445 57 6 64 56 46 5 46 47 4 Richard Rice 875 5 7 4 9 55 7 77 5 44 58 48 79 44 Kerry McCarthy 68 47 8 7 4 68 49 7 8 4 68 49 45 45 496 Lydia Stritzl 746 67 59 7 4 478 49 58 574 96 44 98 9 46 49 5 784 Andrew Smith 857 9 57 6 6 6 4 5 9 45 77 55 7 4 68 44 98 Chris Helfrich 98 57 56 77 8 85 566 447 4 4 54 4 99 Iegor Reznikoff 544 89 4 55 5 54 59 865 95 568 6 75 84 5 85 478 6 54 Toivo Tulev 8 87 64 54 5 5 6 46 648 44 47 75 7 487 54 Kadri Hunt 97 8 5 5 94 49 48 57 65 468 66 9 84 4 76 44 559 Richard Crocker 96 885 5 8 9 79 94 55 9 9 4 68 8 4 5 5 5 J.P. Ollivry 48 78 9 477 5 9 6 7 88 9 66 46 57 88 Jaan Eik Tulve 4 97 69 9 4 4 8 57 57 55 6 88 8 55 8 47 95 Columba Kelly 75 47 9 74 9 4 8 4 44 57 67 86 6 454 9 45 94 Martin Quesnel 77 55 4 7 7 44 56 95 4 5 88 5 84 78 5 454 88 Tim Pehta 95 4 8 94 6 66 45 47 448 44 97 6 56 99 76 68 John Rowlands 87 45 54 6 84 8 59 6 5 47 45 57 7 64 78 87 89 Tõnis Kaumann 97 74 6 58 44 86 78 8 686 9 8 486 8 86 79 467 98 Eerik Jõks 86 47 57 7 88 85 46 4 7 4 9 85 97 69 9 7 Peeter Perens 4 975 49 47 76 49 99 46 5 46 5 7 44 85 5 56 75 66 69 Mike Forbester 4 985 9 9 85 94 89 6 69 448 84 4 5 88 8 88 67 56 H.L. Vuori 4 46 587 89 4 56 768 5 646 796 4 4 8 56 4 85 6 74 95 Indrek Laos 4 89 66 64 67 8 9 547 48 65 47 9 97 86 44 9 7 Lauri Jõeleht 5 98 66 6 77 84 87 46 44 7 78 94 45 9 9 5 47 Eve Kopli 5 46 89 7 6 7 7 67 57 46 4 54 79 88 6 45 9 Lilian Langsepp 5 849 4 469 65 66 64 6 56 47 5 5 8 6 76 9 4 4 Maile Nairis 5 75 76 69 9 9 6 49 44 699 7 5 5 8 8 494 54 Maria Staak 5 869 85 67 75 49 4 76 476 68 45 54 4 55 864 Riho Ridbek 5 88 4 4 5 84 5 448 6 44 89 47 8 464 66 Guntars Pranis 5 7 549 69 54 6 6 76 46 95 86 86 5 46 75 5 698 844 Ulrike Heider 5 68 7 469 5 5 45 848 8 498 9 6 44 84 9 4 496

658 Appendix 54 Table 7 (additional). Performers who perceive notes and as of equal duration; ratio of and and deviation of from ; sorted by the ratio of and ; divided into three segments by different colours: () the second note is longer, () the first and the second notes are equal, () the first note is longer. Performer Note Note ratio of and deviation of from in msec Iegor Reznikoff 544 89.67 65 Martin Quesnel 7 7.89 47 Andrew Smith 857 9.95 46 Kadri Hunt 97.4 4 Lydia Stritzl 746 67. 7 Eerik Jõks 86.4 55 Jaan Eik Tulve 4 97. 87 Taivo Niitvägi 85 656.6 69 Tõnis Kaumann 97 74. Toivo Tulev 8 87.8 Kerry McCarthy 68 47.44 7 J.P. Ollivry 48 78.47 68 Chris Helfrich 98 57.76 4 John Rowlands 87 45.8 74 Tim Pehta 95 4. 58 Columba Kelly 75 47.9 95

659 Appendix 55 Figure 5 (additional). Transcription of a fragment of the verse Confitemini Domino of the Gradual Haec dies from selected medieval and contemporary sources.

66 Appendix 56 Table 76 (additional). BNV and values describing the ratio of the first and the second musical sentences; sorted and grouped by F. Performer BNV Number of notes in the first musical sentence A B C D E F F G H I Number Ratio of Length Length Ratio of Deviation of rence rence Diffe Diffe of notes number of all of all lengths in the of notes notes in notes in of all ratio of from the from the second in the the first the notes of sentencelength of length of musical musical musical second the sentences from musical second s (F) the first the sentenctences tence, sen and or ratio of sen musical sen sen musical and or without tence, ratio of notes sen ratio of breaths. without sentences (C) notes breaths. tence (D) that would have given a ratio of notes (C) tence (E) that would have given a ratio of notes (C) Sum of all the notes without breaths. Korkala ED 49 85.576 586 479.548.9 4 8 7.899. Smith 49 85.576 48 486.558.8 74 88 6.767. Vuori ED 5 85.588 6 57646.58.5 8 5 9.48 4. Joppich ED 5 84.595 4664 58678.59.4 6 44 9.4 5. Crocker 5 84.595 67 78.69.4 5 858 59.898 6. Nairis 48 8.585 58 585.6.5 55 94 57.9 7. Laos 49 85.576 78 54.598. 764 6 56.589 8. Pehta 5 85.588 999 7645.6. 855 45 6.644 9. Rowlands 5 85.588 66 56.67.9 74 56.686. Niitvägi 49 8.6 8696 44687.64. 6 64 7.8. Heider 5 85.588 968 87.69. 4 6.67. Pranis 5 85.588 67 495.6. 9 858 55.56. Jõeleht 5 84.595 88 64.69.4 4 7 59.5 4. Jõks 5 85.588 448 7.6.4 566 66 6.649 5. Stritzl 5 85.588 5 999.6.44 744 964 65.6 6. Langsepp 5 85.588 44 5458.6.45 58 689 57.898 7. Forbster 5 85.588 67 4.65.47 64 77 55.78 8. Quesnel 5 85.588 94 46949.64.5 477 4 77.4 9. Alsdatt 5 84.595 945 84.649.54 8 4 55.769. Perens 5 85.588 547 658.645.57 7 5 6.55. Reznikoff ED 46 8.568 45 54.69.6 4 54 8.49. Boesschoten 48 85.565 446 887.68.6 455 448 6.76. Helfrich 47 85.55 8 6767.6.68 49 455 59.588 4. Ollivry 5 85.588 74 7.658.7 9 54.75 5. Minier 44 8.55 57 559.64.74 76 6794 8.56 6. Tulev 5 85.588 79 58.67.84 774 476 55.46 7. Ridbek 45 8.54 456 8899.6.88 46 6 6.45 8. Kelly 5 85.588 557 75.68.94 5 597 6.75 9. Tulve 5 85.588 47 58.69.4 644 695 59.45. Hunt 5 85.588 58 5774.699. 965 674 6.78. Rice 4 8.5 5988 44.6.9 49 9584 67.. Kopli 5 84.595 596 86.75. 68 695 5.78. McCarthy 4 79.59 557 8676.66.4 55 599 64.49 4. Kaumann 49 85.576 968 45.7.46 449 768 5.9 5. Staak 4 8.5 4 486.699.68 585 5 59.6

66 Appendix 57 Table 77 (additional). BNV and values describing the ratio of the first and the second musical sentences with number of notes 5/85 for all performers who treat SNOP as one long note; sorted and grouped by F. Performer BNV Number of notes in the first musical sentence A B C D E F F G H I Number Length Length Ratio of Differencrence Diffe of notes of all of all lengths in the notes in notes in of all from the from the second the first the notes of musical musical second sentences sentenctence sen- musical sentence Ratio of number of notes in the musical sentences and or ratio of notes and or ratio of sentences Deviation of ratio of sentences (F) from ratio of notes (C) length of the first musical sentence (D) that would have given a ratio of notes (C) length of the second musical sentence (E) that would have given a ratio of notes (C) Sum of all the notes without breaths. Korkala () ED 5(49) 85.588 586 479.548.4 896 4 7.899. Smith () 5 (49) 85.588 48 486.558. 7 68 6.767. Vuori () ED 5 85.588 6 57646.58.5 8 5 9.48 4. Joppich (4) ED 5 85(84).595 4664 58678.59.4 6 44 9.4 5. Laos (7) 5(49) 85.588 78 54.598. 48 59 56.589 6. Nairis (6) 5(48) 85(8).588 58 585.6. 449 76 57.9 7. Crocker (5) 5 85(84).595 67 78.69.4 5 858 59.898 8. Pehta (8) 5 85.588 999 7645.6. 855 45 6.644 9. Rowlands (9) 5 85.588 66 56.67.9 74 56.686. Niitvägi () 5(49) 85(8).6 8696 44687.64. 6 64 7.8. Heider () 5 85.588 968 87.69. 4 6.67. Helfrich () 5(47) 85.588 8 6767.6. 9 9 59.588. Pranis () 5 85.588 67 495.6. 9 858 55.56 4. Jõeleht () 5 85(84).595 88 64.69.4 4 7 59.5 5. Minier (5) 5(44) 85(8).588 57 559.64.6 85 68 8.56 6. Boesschoten () 5(48) 85.588 446 887.68.4 54 69 6.76 7. Reznikoff () ED 5(46) 85(8).588 45 54.69.4 7 49 8.49 8. Ridbek (7) 5(45) 85(8).588 456 8899.6.4 64 76 6.45 9. Jõks (4) 5 85.588 448 7.6.4 566 66 6.649. Rice () 5(4) 85(8).588 5988 44.6.44 797 55 67.. Stritzl (5) 5 85.588 5 999.6.44 744 964 65.6. Langsepp (6) 5 85.588 44 5458.6.45 58 689 57.898. Forbster (7) 5 85.588 67 4.65.47 64 77 55.78 4. Quesnel (8) 5 85.588 94 46949.64.5 477 4 77.4 5. Perens () 5 85.588 547 658.645.57 7 5 6.55 6. Alsdatt (9) 5 85(84).588 945 84.649.6 48 48 55.769 7. Ollivry (4) 5 85.588 74 7.658.7 9 54.75 8. McCarthy () 5(4) 85(79).588 557 8676.66.7 8 4798 64.49 9. Tulev (6) 5 85.588 79 58.67.84 774 476 55.46. Kelly (8) 5 85.588 557 75.68.94 5 597 6.75. Tulve (9) 5 85.588 47 58.69.4 644 695 59.45. Hunt () 5 85.588 58 5774.699. 965 674 6.78. Staak (5) 5(4) 85(8).588 4 486.699. 856 6555 59.6 4. Kopli () 5 85(84).588 596 86.75.7 89 657 5.78 5. Kaumann (4) 5(49) 85.588 968 45.7.4 47 69 5.9

66 Appendix 58 Table 78 (additional). BNV and values describing the ratio of the first and the second musical sentences with number of notes 5/85 for all performers who treat SNOP as one long note; all negative values in F are transformed into absolute values; sorted and grouped by F. Performer BNV DNC Number of A B C D E F F G H I Number A:B or Length Length D:E or F C Diffe Diffe of ratio of of all of all ratio of Deviarencrence notes in notes in notes notes in notes in the sentences tion of from D from E the first the the first the ratio of that that musical second musical second sentences would would sentence musical sen- musical have have sentence sen- from given given tence tence ratio of ratio of ratio of notes notes notes Sum of all the notes without breaths (C) (C). (4) Joppich (4) ED 7 5 85(84).595 4664 58678.59.4 6 44 9.4. () Vuori () ED 6 5 85.588 6 57646.58.5 8 5 9.48. (5) Laos (7) 5(49) 85.588 78 54.598. 48 59 56.589 4. (6) Nairis (6) 5(48) 85(8).588 58 585.6. 449 76 57.9 5. (7) Crocker (5) 5 85(84).595 67 78.69.4 5 858 59.898 6. (8) Pehta (8) 5 85.588 999 7645.6. 855 45 6.644 7. (9) Rowlands (9) 6 5 85.588 66 56.67.9 74 56.686 8. () Smith () 5 (49) 85.588 48 486.558. 7 68 6.767 9. () Niitvägi () 6 5(49) 85(8).6 8696 44687.64. 6 64 7.8. () Heider () 9 5 85.588 968 87.69. 4 6.67. () Helfrich () 5(47) 85.588 8 6767.6. 9 9 59.588. () Pranis () 7 5 85.588 67 495.6. 9 858 55.56. (4) Jõeleht () 8 5 85(84).595 88 64.69.4 4 7 59.5 4. (5) Minier (5) 9 5(44) 85(8).588 57 559.64.6 85 68 8.56 5. () Korkala () ED 5 5(49) 85.588 586 479.548.4 896 4 7.899 6. Boesschoten () 5(48) 85.588 446 887.68.4 54 69 6.76 7. Reznikoff () ED 5 5(46) 85(8).588 45 54.69.4 7 49 8.49 8. Ridbek (7) 5(45) 85(8).588 456 8899.6.4 64 76 6.45 9. Jõks (4) 5 85.588 448 7.6.4 566 66 6.649. Rice () 5(4) 85(8).588 5988 44.6.44 797 55 67.. Stritzl (5) 9 5 85.588 5 999.6.44 744 964 65.6. Langsepp (6) 6 5 85.588 44 5458.6.45 58 689 57.898. Forbster (7) 5 85.588 67 4.65.47 64 77 55.78 4. Quesnel (8) 7 5 85.588 94 46949.64.5 477 4 77.4 5. Perens () 5 85.588 547 658.645.57 7 5 6.55 6. Alsdatt (9) 5 5 85(84).588 945 84.649.6 48 48 55.769 7. Ollivry (4) 7 5 85.588 74 7.658.7 9 54.75 8. McCarthy () 5(4) 85(79).588 557 8676.66.7 8 4798 64.49 9. Tulev (6) 5 85.588 79 58.67.84 774 476 55.46. Kelly (8) 5 85.588 557 75.68.94 5 597 6.75. Tulve (9) 5 85.588 47 58.69.4 644 695 59.45. Hunt () 5 85.588 58 5774.699. 965 674 6.78. Staak (5) 6 5(4) 85(8).588 4 486.699. 856 6555 59.6 4. Kopli () 5 5 85(84).588 596 86.75.7 89 657 5.78 5. Kaumann (4) 5(49) 85.588 968 45.7.4 47 69 5.9

66 Appendix 59 Table 79 (additional). BNV, DNC, mean note value in the first musical sentence ( Mean ), mean note value in the second musical sentence ( Mean ), difference between means ( Dif ) and values describing the ratio of the first and the second musical sentences; all negative values in DIF and F are transformed into absolute values; sorted and grouped by F. Performer BNV DNC Mean Mean Dif Deviation of ratio of sentences from ratio of notes F G H I Difference Difference from D from E that that would would have have given given ratio of ratio of notes (C) notes (C) Sum of all the notes without breaths. (4) Joppich (4) ED 7 69 699 5.4 6 44 9.4. () Vuori () ED 6 67 678 6.5 8 5 9.48. (5) Laos (7) 44 47 7. 48 59 56.589 4. (6) Nairis (6) 4 4 9. 449 76 57.9 5. (7) Crocker (5) 45 44.4 5 858 59.898 6. (8) Pehta (8) 46 44 7. 855 45 6.644 7. (9) Rowlands (9) 6 4 4.9 74 56.686 8. () Smith () 45 474 4. 7 68 6.767 9. () Niitvägi () 6 586 559 7. 6 64 7.8. () Heider () 9 479 455 4. 4 6.67. () Pranis () 7 45 4. 9 858 55.56. () Helfrich () 456 4 4. 9 9 59.588. (4) Jõeleht () 8 456 4 5.4 4 7 59.5 4. (5) Minier (5) 9 6 594 6.6 85 68 8.56 5. Boesschoten () 488 457.4 54 69 6.76 6. () Korkala () ED 5 56 554 8.4 896 4 7.899 7. Reznikoff () ED 5 69 589 4.4 7 49 8.49 8. Jõks (4) 469 48.4 566 66 6.649 9. Ridbek (7) 49 458.4 64 76 6.45. Stritzl (5) 9 55 47 5.44 744 964 65.6. Rice () 5 484 6.44 797 55 67.. Langsepp (6) 6 449 47.45 58 689 57.898. Forbster (7) 4 4.47 64 77 55.78 4. Quesnel (8) 7 6 55 5.5 477 4 77.4 5. Perens () 47 4 4.57 7 5 6.55 6. Alsdatt (9) 5 49 98 4.6 48 48 55.769 7. Ollivry (4) 7 45 88 46.7 9 54.75 8. McCarthy () 5 455 56.7 8 4798 64.49 9. Tulev (6) 446 9 55.84 774 476 55.46. Kelly (8) 5 44 7.94 5 597 6.75. Tulve (9) 485 4 7.4 644 695 59.45. Staak (5) 6 487 49 77. 856 6555 59.6. Hunt () 5 4 79. 965 674 6.78 4. Kopli () 5 4 59 7.7 89 657 5.78 5. Kaumann (4) 49 58 8.4 47 69 5.9

664 Appendix 6 Table 8 (additional). Number of DNC, BNV, differences in musical sentences that separates from ideal balance of two musical sentences; sorted by Difference in the first musical sentence, that separates from the ideal balance of two sentences ; all negative values are transformed into absolute values and marked as blue text. Performer BNV DNC Difference in the first musical sentence that separates from the ratio of notes of two sentences (in msec) Percent of the difference from the length of the first musical sentence Difference in the second musical sentence that separates from the ratio of notes of two sentences (in msec) Percent of the difference from the length of the second musical sentence. Joppich () ED 7 6.% 44.8%. Vuori () ED 6 8.6% 5.9%. Laos () 48.8% 59.7% 4. Nairis (4) 449.5% 76.% 5. Crocker (5) 5.8% 858.% 6. Pehta (6) 855 6.% 45.9% 7. Rowlands (7) 6 7.9% 74 4.9% 8. Pranis () 7 9 8.7% 858 5.4% 9. Helfrich () 9 8.9% 9 5.5%. Heider () 9 8.5% 4 5.%. Smith (8) 7 9.% 68 5.%. Jõeleht () 8 4 9.% 7 5.7%. Niitvägi (9) 6 6 7.5% 64 4.8% 4. Boesschoten (6) 54.7% 69 6.7% 5. Jõks (9) 566.% 66 7.% 6. Langsepp () 6 58.% 689 7.6% 7. Forbster () 64.6% 77 8.% 8. Ridbek (8) 64.% 76 7.% 9. Stritzl () 9 744.7% 964 7.4%. Rice () 797.8% 55 7.4%. Minier (4) 9 85 9.7% 68 6.%. Korkala (5) ED 5 896.5% 4 6.8%. Reznikoff (7) ED 5 7.9% 49 6.9% 4. Alsdatt (6) 5 48 5.9% 48.% 5. Perens (5) 7 5.% 5 9.6% 6. Ollivry (7) 7 8.% 9.9% 7. Quesnel (4) 7 477 4.% 4 9.% 8. Tulev (9) 774.% 476 4.% 9. McCarthy (8) 8 8.8% 4798.4%. Kelly () 5.4% 597 5.9%. Tulve () 644 5.6% 695 7.7%. Kopli (4) 5 89.% 657.6%. Staak () 6 856 6.9% 6555 8.8% 4. Hunt () 965 7.% 674 8.8% 5. Kaumann (5) 47.5% 69.7%

665 Appendix 6 Table 8 (additional). Correlations between the length of the piece and the questions 7, 4 7, 85 9, 7 9, and 46 which are significant at least at the.5 level. Argument Gregorian chant, for me, means inspiration for my musical activities. Gregorian chant, for me, means a broad based domain of musicology and liturgics. Gregorian chant, for me, means a method of composing liturgical music. How important is excellent articulation for a good performance of Gregorian chant? How important is the knowledge of the historical background for a good performance of Gregorian chant? How important is respecting of the 8 mode system for a good performance of Gregorian chant? How important is theoretical knowledge of paleography for a good performance of Gregorian chant? How important is theoretical knowledge of semiology for a good performance of Gregorian chant? Pearson Correlation Significance index Number of respondents.486**.7.6*.4.75*.4.44*.7.49**.5.67*.4.48**.6.4*.

666 Appendix 6 Table 8 (additional). Comparison of the results of the correlation analysis and the ANOVA test (length of the piece). Argument Gregorian chant, for me, means inspiration for my musical activities. Gregorian chant, for me, means medieval monodic liturgical chant of the Western church based on the Roman rite. How important is excellent articulation for a good performance of Gregorian chant? How important is the knowledge of the historical background for a good performance of Gregorian chant? How important is imitation of one s teacher for a good performance of Gregorian chant? How important is theoretical knowledge of paleography for a good performance of Gregorian chant? Gregorian chant, for me, means a broad based domain of musicology and liturgics. Gregorian chant, for me, means a method of composing liturgical music. How important is respecting the individualities of the eight modes for a good performance of Gregorian chant? How important is theoretical knowledge of semiology for a good performance of Gregorian chant? Significance in the correlation Significance in the ANOVA test.7..94.4.7..5.4.8.5.6..4.5.4.6.4.4..5

667 Appendix 6 Table 8 (additional). Comparison of means according to the length of the piece. 4 5 6 7 8 9 Argument Gregorian chant, for me, means inspiration for my musical activities. Gregorian chant, for me, means medieval monodic liturgical chant of the Western church based on the Roman rite. How important is excellent articulation for a good performance of Gregorian chant? How important is the knowledge of the historical background for a good performance of Gregorian chant? How important is imitation of one s teacher for a good performance of Gregorian chant? How important is theoretical knowledge of paleography for a good performance of Gregorian chant? Gregorian chant, for me, means a broadbased domain of musicology and liturgics. Gregorian chant, for me, means a method of composing liturgical music. How important is respecting the individualities of the eight modes for a good performance of Gregorian chant? How important is theoretical knowledge of semiology for a good performance of Gregorian chant? Fast Medium Slow Sig tempo tempo tempo (corr) Sig (ANOVA) 5.5 5.9.8.7. 7. 4.86 6.5.94.4 5.64 6.57 7.7.7. 4.9 4.9 6..5.4.9.86.8.8.5.64 4.6 6.5.6. 4.9 4.4 6.5.4.5 4.8.6 6..4.6 5.8 5.9 6..4.4.9 4.57 6.7..5

668 Appendix 64 Table 85 (additional). Correlation analysis of StDev of all notes ( StDev all notes ), StDev of notes without bins, which contain less than three notes ( StDev > ), StDev of notes without bins, which contain less than five notes ( StDev >5 ); in the order of the questions in the questionnaire. Argument StDev StDev StDev all notes > > 5 PC Sig PC Sig PC Sig Gregorian chant, for me, means Franco Roman chant, a part of Latin sacred.5*.5 monody. Gregorian chant, for me, means inspiration for my musical activities..48*.7 Gregorian chant, for me, means a broadbased domain of musicology and liturgics..7*.7 Gregorian chant, for me, means a method of composing liturgical music..44*. Gregorian chant, for me, means sacred text, illuminated by music..55*.46 How important is excellent articulation for a good performance of Gregorian chant?.56**. How important is musical phrasing for a good performance of Gregorian chant?.48*.9 How important is excellent diction for a good performance of Gregorian chant?.88*. How important is the knowledge of the historical background for a good.6*.45.47*. performance of Gregorian chant? How important is respecting the individualities of the eight modes for a good.478**.7 performance of Gregorian chant? How important is general musicality for a good performance of Gregorian chant?.548**. How important is imitation of one's teacher for a good performance of Gregorian chant?.49*.6 How important is religious intention for a good performance of Gregorian chant?.67*.4 How important is semiological precision for a good performance of Gregorian chant?.48*.4 How important is textual narrative for a good performance of Gregorian chant?.7.96*.7 How important is theoretical knowledge of paleography for a good performance of.454*..585**..6*.47 Gregorian chant? How important is theoretical knowledge of semiology for a good performance of.45*. Gregorian chant? How important is excellent intonation for a good performance of Gregorian chant?.464**.9 This relationship means that music and text are different structures, which have been.68*.4 combined together. How important is religion for you?.7*.4

669 Appendix 65 Table 87 (additional). Correlation analysis of the DNC of all notes ( DNC all notes ), notes without bins, which contain less than three notes ( DNC > ), notes without bins, which contain less than five notes ( DNC >5 ); in the order of the questions in the questionnaire. Argument Gregorian chant, for me, means inspiration for my musical activities. Gregorian chant, for me, means a broadbased domain of musicology and liturgics. Gregorian chant, for me, means a method of composing liturgical music. Gregorian chant, for me, means boring duty that I need to do routinely. How important is excellent articulation for a good performance of Gregorian chant? How important is variety of dynamics for a good performance of Gregorian chant? How important is musical phrasing for a good performance of Gregorian chant? How important is excellent diction for a good performance of Gregorian chant? How important is the knowledge of the historical background for a good performance of Gregorian chant? How important is respecting the individualities of the eight modes for a good performance of Gregorian chant? How important is general musicality for a good performance of Gregorian chant? How important is imitation of one's teacher for a good performance of Gregorian chant? How important is avoiding a routine interpretation for a good performance of Gregorian chant? How important is semiological precision for a good performance of Gregorian chant? How important is textual narrative for a good performance of Gregorian chant? How important is theoretical knowledge of paleography for a good performance of Gregorian chant? How important is theoretical knowledge of semiology for a good performance of Gregorian chant? How important is excellent intonation for a good performance of Gregorian chant? How important is understanding of what the text means for a good performance of Gregorian chant? This relationship means that music has been forced upon the text and earns its merits at the expense of the text. DNC All notes DNC > DNC > 5 PC Sig PC Sig PC Sig.4*..58*.44.44*.6.486**.6.76*.7.48*.6.75*.8.4*..4*.9.459**.9.46*..6*.46.4*.6.45*.4.454*..7*.9.48*..497**.4.46*.7.48*..477**.7.5**..79*.5.44*..4*..66*.4.68*.4.9*..97*.7

67 Appendix 66 Table 88 (additional). DNC in all partitions and groups formed on the base of DNC> ; sorted by DNC>. Performer DNC > Groups DNC all DNC>5 Lilian Langsepp 7 9 7 Mike Forbster 7 5 Kerry McCarthy 8 4 Eerik Jõks 8 7 Maile Nairis 8 8 John Alsdatt 9 5 7 Taivo Niitvägi 9 6 6 Lydia Stritzl 9 6 7 John Rowlands Pritchard 9 6 7 Lauri Jõeleht 9 8 7 Peeter Perens 9 6 Gereon van Boesschoten 9 6 Jean Pascal Ollivry 7 7 Guntars Pranis 7 7 Toivo Tulev 8 Chris Helfrich 7 Indrek Laos Ulrike Heider 9 9 Tõnis Kaumann 7 Tim Pehta 8 Andrew Smith Columba Kelly 6 Richard Crocker 6 Martin Quesnel 7 6 Riho Ridbek 6 Eve Kopli 5 Maria Staak 6 Kadri Hunt 9 Jaan Eik Tulve 8 Richard Rice 8 Dominique Minier 9 8 Iegor Reznikoff 4 5 Marja Korkala 5 5 Hilkka Liisa Vuori 5 6 Godehard Joppich 5 7

67 Appendix 67 Table 9 (additional). Comparison of means according to the groups formed on the base of DNC (>). Low Medium Sig Sig Argument High DNC DNC DNC (corr) (ANOVA) How important is excellent articulation for a 5.56 6.75 6.6.6. good performance of Gregorian chant? 4 5 6 7 8 9 4 5 How important is variety of dynamics for a good performance of Gregorian chant?. 4.5 4.6.7. How important is musical phrasing for a good performance of Gregorian chant? 4.89 7.7 6.4.6. How important is excellent diction for a good performance of Gregorian chant? 5.67 6. 6.6.8.4 How important is the knowledge of the historical background for a good performance of 4. 4.5 5.9..98 Gregorian chant? How important is respecting the individualities of the eight modes for a good performance of Gregorian chant? 4.89 5.67 6.6.4.58 How important is general musicality for a good performance of Gregorian chant? 5.67 6.5 6.7.9.8 How important is avoiding a routine interpretation for a good performance of 4.89 6.67 6.8..4 Gregorian chant? How important is semiological precision for a good performance of Gregorian chant? 4. 6. 6...5 How important is accurate venue for a good performance of Gregorian chant?.89. 5...5 How important is theoretical knowledge of paleography for a good performance of.78 5.67 4.7.7.8 Gregorian chant? How important is theoretical knowledge of semiology for a good performance of Gregorian. 5.7 5.4.. chant? How important is excellent intonation for a good performance of Gregorian chant? 5.44 6.75 6.8.4.97 How important is understanding of what the text means for a good performance of Gregorian 6.56 7.5 7.5.4.49 chant? How important is animated performance for a good performance of Gregorian chant? 4.56 6.67 5..67.47 6 How important is religion for you? *** *** ***.8.4

67 Appendix 68 In this appendix is the script according to which a family tree of Gregorian chant performers is drawn by the software Graphviz. The script is added in case something remains unclear in Appendix 5. There are two columns in the script: the first column teachers and the second column pupils. An abbreviation SM in the script means schola mastrer. The software Graphviz does not support some letters, for example ö and is reluctant to use several symbols like é. Therefore, some names are misspelled in the schema, for which I apologise. The script of a family tree of Gregorian chant performers (Appendix 5, vol, pp 684 685) "Albert Fuller" > "Richard Crocker" "Albert Lehner" > "Gunther Kornbrust" "Alberto Turco" > "Guntars Pranis" "Alberto Turco" > "Maria Helena Piers de Matos" "Alexander McCabe" > "Mike Forbester" "Alexander Schweitzer" > "Andrew Smith" "Alphonse Kurris" > "Henry Vesseur" "Anders Ekenberg" > "Ulrike Heider" "Andre Lietaert" > "Walter Deroo" "Andre Madrignac" > "Jean Pascal Ollivry" "Andrei Kotov" > "Marius Peterson" "Anton Dawidowicz" > "Stefan Engels" "Antonino Albarosa" > "Alexander Schweitzer" "Antonino Albarosa" > "Guntars Pranis" "Antonino Albarosa" > "Maria Helena Piers de Matos" "Augusta Gerhauser" > "Lydia Stritzl" "Barnabas Liebisch" > "Godehard Joppich" "Ben Harrison" > "Mike Forbester" "Benjamin Bagby" > "Jordan Sramek" "Benjamin Rajecky" > "Stefan Engels" "Bernadette Byne" > "Benedict Hardy" "Bernard Girod" > "Luca Basilio Ricossa" "Bernardus Smal" > "SM Abdij O.L.V van Koningshoeven" "Bonifacio Giacomo Baroffio" > "Guido Milanese" "Books" > "Enn Kivinurm" "Brigitte Lesne" > "Antoine Guerber" "Brigitte Lesne" > "Marja Korkala" "Cantors" > "Lilian Langsepp" "Carlo Hommel" > "Erna Verlinden" "Caroline Magalhaes" > "Marja Korkala" "Catherine Schroeder" > "Marja Korkala" "Catherine Sergent" > "Brendan Coffey" "Catherine Sergent" >"Marja Korkala"

67 "Clement Morin" > "Werner Beheydt" "Clement Morin" > "William Tortolano" "Cyril Karam" > "SM St. Benedict Abbey" "Daniel Saulnier" > "Benedict Hardy" "Daniel Saulnier" > "Columba Kelly" "Daniel Saulnier" > "Donat Lamothe" "Daniel Saulnier" > "Jaan Eik Tulve" "Daniel Saulnier" > "Louis Marie Gantier" "Daniel Saulnier" > "Margo Kolar" "Dean Applegate" > "Kerry McCarthy" "Dietmar von Huebner" > "Stefan Engels" "Dominique Vellard" > "Antoine Guerber" "Dominique Vellard" > "Eve Kopli" "Dominique Vellard" > "Joel Vahermagi" "Dominique Vellard" > "Kadri Hunt" "Dominique Vellard" > "Margo Kolar" "Dominique Vellard" > "Maria Staak" "Dominique Vellard" > "Marius Peterson" "Dominique Vellard" > "Taivo Niitvagi" "Dominique Vellard" > "Taniel Kirikal" "E.G. Madrignac" > "Louis Marie Vigne" "Eleanor Florence Dewey" > "Luis Henrique Camargo Quiroz" "Elizabeth Paterson" > "Tim Pehta" "Emma Hornby" > "Christoph Tietze" "Eric Mentzel" > "Jordan Sramek" "Eugeen Liven" > "Simon Paul" "Eugene Cardine" > "Antonino Albarosa" "Eugene Cardine" > "Columba Kelly" "Eugene Cardine" > "Godehard Joppich" "Eugene Cardine" > "Guido Milanese" "Eugene Cardine" > "Jean Pascal Ollivry" "Eugene Cardine" > "Laurentius Schlieker" "Eugene Cardine" > "Louis Marie Vigne" "Eugene Cardine" > "Marie Noel Colette" "Eugene Cardine" > "Michiko Hirayama" "Eugene Cardine" > "Roman Bannwart" "Eugene Cardine" > "SM Benediktinerabtei Konigsmunster" "Eugene Cardine" > "William Tortolano" "Frans Mariman" > "Erna Verlinden" "Frans Mariman" > "Werner Beheydt" "Frans Moonen" > "Ulrike Heider" "Frans Van Heghe" > "Gert Van Heghe" "Franz A. Stein" > "Christoph Honerlage" "Franz Karl Prassl" > "Guntars Pranis" "Franz Stemmer" > "Anton Stingl jun." "Gabriel Bestonniere Ocso" > "Benedict Hardy" "Gabriel Picard d'estelan" > "Damien Reverchon" "Gabriele Cantoni" > "Giampiero Innocente" "Georg Beres" > "Tamas Jakabffy" "Gilbert Chabot" > "Donat Lamothe" "Godehard Joppich" > "Anton Stingl jun." "Godehard Joppich" > "David Eben"

674 "Godehard Joppich" > "Eerik Joks" "Godehard Joppich" > "Franz Karl Prassl" "Godehard Joppich" > "Guido Milanese" "Godehard Joppich" > "Guntars Pranis" "Godehard Joppich" > "Gunther Kornbrust" "Godehard Joppich" > "Henry Vesseur" "Godehard Joppich" > "Johanna Gruger" "Godehard Joppich" > "Laurentius Schlieker" "Godehard Joppich" > "SM Benediktinerabtei Konigsmunster" "Godehard Joppich" > "Volker Linz" "Gottfried Sauseng" > "Franz Karl Prassl" "Gregor Baumhof" > "SM Cistercienserinnenabtei Lichtenthal" "Gregory Labus" > "Austin Riddle" "Greta Mary Hair" > "Rebecca Tavener" "Hans van der Hombergh" > "Ulrike Heider" "Hubert Orschel" > "Godehard Joppich" "Iegor Reznikoff" > "Anti Hanninen" "Iegor Reznikoff" > "Hilkka Liisa Vuori" "Iegor Reznikoff" > "Marja Korkala" "Ilkka Taitto" > "Hilkka Liisa Vuori" "Ilkka Taitto" > "Marja Korkala" "J. B. Goschl" > "Alexander Schweitzer" "J. B. Goschl" > "Christoph Honerlage" "J. B. Goschl" > "Franz Karl Prassl" "J. B. Goschl" > "Giampiero Innocente" "J. B. Goschl" > "Guntars Pranis" "J. B. Goschl" > "Henry Vesseur" "J. B. Goschl" > "Johanna Gruger" "J. B. Goschl" > "Maria Helena Piers de Matos" "J. B. Goschl" > "Marius Schwemmer" "J. B. Goschl" > "SM Benediktinerabtei Konigsmunster" "J. B. Goschl" > "SM Cistercienserinnenabtei Lichtenthal" "J. William Jones" > "Jeffrey Rickard" "Jaan Eik Tulve" > "Benedict Hardy" "Jaan Eik Tulve" > "Donat Lamothe" "Jaan Eik Tulve" > "Erik Salumae" "Jaan Eik Tulve" > "Jaan Leppik" "Jaan Eik Tulve" > "Joel Vahermagi" "Jaan Eik Tulve" > "Kadri Hunt" "Jaan Eik Tulve" > "Lauri Joeleht" "Jaan Eik Tulve" > "Louis Marie Gantier" "Jaan Eik Tulve" > "Maile Nairis" "Jaan Eik Tulve" > "Margo Kolar" "Jaan Eik Tulve" > "Maria Staak" "Jaan Eik Tulve" > "Taniel Kirikal" "Jaan Eik Tulve" > "Toivo Tulev" "Jaan Eik Tulve" > "Tonis Kaumann" "Jacques Levron" > "Werner Beheydt" "Jaques Hourier" > "Louis Marie Vigne" "Jaromir Cerny" > "David Eben" "Jean Claire" > "Columba Kelly" "Jean Claire" > "Jean Pascal Ollivry"

675 "Jean Claire" > "Jean Paul Armanini" "Jean Claire" > "Louis Marie Gantier" "Jean Claire" > "Louis Marie Vigne" "Jean Claire" > "Werner Beheydt" "Jean Jeanneteau" > "Jean Paul Armanini" "Jean Jeanneteau" > "Louis Marie Gantier" "Jean Jeanneteau" > "Werner Beheydt" "Jean Langlais" > "Christoph Tietze" "Jean Pascal Ollivry" > "Lilian Langsepp" "Jean Pierre Noiseux" > "Martin Quesnel" "Jerome Roche" > "Benedict Hardy" "Johanna Korhonen" > "Hilkka Liisa Vuori" "John Caldwell" > "Peter Allan" "Jos Lennards" > "Maria Helena Piers de Matos" "Julia d'almendra" > "Maria Helena Piers de Matos" "Katarina Livljanic" > "Brendan Coffey" "Katarina Livljanic" > "Jordan Sramek" "Kees Pouderoijen" > "David Eben" "Kees Pouderoijen" > "Erna Verlinden" "Kees Pouderoijen" > "Henry Vesseur" "Kees Pouderoijen" > "Jaan Leppik" "Kees Pouderoijen" > "Jaan Eik Tulve" "Kirsti Autio" > "Anti Hanninen" "Kirsti Autio" > "Hilkka Liisa Vuori" "Laurentius Schlieker" > "Guntars Pranis" "Lilian Langsepp" > "Maile Nairis" "Liobgid Koch" > "Johanna Gruger" "Louis Bouyer" > "Donat Lamothe" "Louis Marie Vigne" > "David Eben" "Louis Marie Vigne" > "Jaan Eik Tulve" "Louis Marie Vigne" > "Jean Pascal Ollivry" "Louis Marie Vigne" > "Margo Kolar" "Louis Marie Vigne" > "Toivo Tulev" "Luca Ricossa" > "Lilian Langsepp" "Luigi Agustoni" > "Alexander Schweitzer" "Luigi Agustoni" > "Franz Karl Prassl" "Luigi Agustoni" > "Fulvio Rampi" "Luigi Agustoni" > "Guido Milanese" "Luigi Agustoni" > "Maria Helena Piers de Matos" "Luigi Agustoni" > "SM Benediktinerabtei Konigsmunster" "Marcel Peres" > "Indrek Laos" "Marcel Peres" > "Margo Kolar" "Marcel Peres" > "Marius Peterson" "Marcel Peres" > "Taivo Niitvagi" "Marcel Peres" > "Ulrike Heider" "Marcin Bornus" > "Joel Vahermagi" "Marcin Bornus" > "Kadri Hunt"; "Marcin Bornus" > "Margo Kolar" "Marcin Bornus" > "Marius Peterson" "Margriet Tindemans" > "Jordan Sramek" "Maria Staak" > "Maile Nairis" "Marie Keyrouz" > "Marja Korkala"

676 "Marie Noel Colette" > "Antoine Guerber" "Marie Noel Colette" > "Dominique Vellard" "Marie Louise Egbers" > "Erna Verlinden" "Martin Uhlenbrock" > "Johanna Gruger" "Mary Berry" > "Benedict Hardy" "Mary Berry" > "Chris Helfrich" "Mary Berry" > "John Rowlands Pritchard" "Mary Berry" > "Peter Allan" "Mary Berry" > "Tim Pehta" "Massimo Lattanzi" > "Giampiero Innocente" "Matthias Kreuels" > "Anton Stingl jun." "Matthias Kreuels" > "Krystian Skoczowski" "Matthias Kreuels" > "SM Cistercienserinnenabtei Lichtenthal" "Michel Beaudoin" > "Christoph Tietze" "Michiko Hirayama" > "Eerik Joks" "Mike Murphy" > "Mike Forbester" "Monica Laughlin" > "Jordan Sramek" "No specific teacher" > "Ben Odijk" "No specific teacher" > "Iegor Reznikoff" "No specific teacher" > "Jean Pierre Noiseux" "No specific teacher" > "Marcel Peres" "No specific teacher" > "Nigel Holdsworth" "No specific teacher" > "Riho Ridbek" "No specific teacher" > "Ruth Cunningham" "No specific teacher" > "Susan Hellauer" "Nuns trained in the Ward Method at Pius X School of Music" > "Jerome F. Weber" "Oswald Jaggi" > "Roman Bannwart" "Peter McChrystal" > "Benedict Hardy" "Pirmin Vetter" > "Roman Bannwart" "Priests trained in the American seminary system" > "Jerome F. Weber" "Putnam Aldrich" > "William Mahrt" "Rebecca Stewart" > "Karin Strinnholm" "Rebecka Stewart" > "Ulrike Heider" "Recordings" > "Enn Kivinurm" "Recordings" > "Margo Kolar" "Rene Jean Hesbert" > "Jean Paul Armanini" "Richard Hoppin" > "Gerald Hoekstra" "Robert Anderson" > "Taivo Niitvagi" "Robert Pozarski" > "Marius Peterson" "Roel Garza" > "Austin Riddle" "Romuald Simpson" > "SM Douai Abbey" "Rondeau Nivard" > "SM Abdij O.L.V van Koningshoeven" "Rudolf Fischer" > "Christoph Honerlage" "Rudolf Fischer" > "SM Benediktinerabtei Konigsmunster" "Rupert Gottfried Frieberger" > "Stefan Engels" "Ruth Steiner" > "Jerome F. Weber" "Sara Zeller" > "Lydia Stritzl" "Siegfried Koesler" > "Marius Schwemmer" "SMs Glenstall Abbey" > "Brendan Coffey" "Stanislovas Dobrovolskis" > "Taivo Niitvagi" "Stefan Klockner" > "Gunther Kornbrust" "Stefan Klockner" > "Marius Schwemmer"

"Stefan Klockner" > "Wilfried Rombach" "Stylianos Kalaitzakis" > "Marja Korkala" "Sylvain Dieudonne" > "Erna Verlinden" "Taivo Niitvagi" > "Indrek Laos" "Taivo Niitvagi" > "Joel Vahermagi" "Taivo Niitvagi" > "Kadri Hunt"; "Taivo Niitvagi" > "Lauri Joeleht" "Taivo Niitvagi" > "Margo Kolar" "Taivo Niitvagi" > "Maria Staak" "Taivo Niitvagi" > "Marius Peterson" "Taivo Niitvagi" > "Taniel Kirikal" "Theodore Marier" > "Richard Rice" "Tikey Zes" > "Christoph Tietze" "Toivo Tulev" > "Eerik Joks" "Toivo Tulev" > "Erik Salumae" "Toivo Tulev" > "Jaan Leppik" "Toivo Tulev" > "Joel Vahermagi" "Toivo Tulev" > "Kadri Hunt" "Toivo Tulev" > "Lauri Joeleht" "Toivo Tulev" > "Margo Kolar" "Toivo Tulev" > "Peeter Perens" "Toivo Tulev" > "Taniel Kirikal" "Toomas Siitan" > "Eerik Joks" "Toomas Siitan" > "Peeter Perens" "Toomas Siitan" > "Toivo Tulev" "Ulrike Heider" > "Karin Strinnholm" "Van den Driessche" > "Werner Beheydt" "Veikko Kiiver" > "Joel Vahermagi" "Veikko Kiiver" > "Karin Strinnholm" "Veikko Kiiver" > "Margo Kolar" "Veikko Kiiver" > "Maria Staak" "Viveca Servatius" > "Karin Strinnholm" "Werner Beheyd" > "Erna Verlinden" "Werner Beheydt" > "Walter Deroo" "William Mahrt" > "Kerry McCarthy" "William Mahrt" > "Paul Ellison" "William Mahrt" > "Richard Lee" "William Pohl" > "William Mahrt" "Wim van Gerven" > "Simon Paul" "Zygmunt Estreicher" > "Luca Basilio Ricossa" 677