Foundations of Finance: Market Efficiency. Lecture Notes 17. Market Efficiency. I. Readings and Suggested Practice Problems



Similar documents
Risk, Return and Market Efficiency

Securities Regulation - Statutes Quinn - Fall 2004

Case3:14-cv Document1 Filed05/12/14 Page1 of 16

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/31/16 Page 1 of 7

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ADA

Case5:14-cv Document1 Filed03/31/14 Page1 of 5

GRANITE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, LLC. Investment Adviser Code of Ethics

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Hon. INFORMATION. The defendant having waived in open court prosecution by

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) I N F O R M A T I O N

An Investment Company Director s Guide to. Oversight of. Codes of Ethics. and. Personal Investing INVESTMENT COMPANY INSTITUTE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. Plaintiff, v. Civil File No. 2:13-cv Defendant.

It is a market where current prices reflect/incorporate all available information.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

FIN 432 Investment Analysis and Management Review Notes for Midterm Exam

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. ) CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, ) ) FILE NO. v. ) ) COMPLAINT OF PLAINTIFF COMPLAINT

Case 2:13-cv DS Document 1 Filed 08/08/13 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) I N D I C T M E N T

PHOENIX NEW MEDIA LIMITED STATEMENT OF POLICIES GOVERNING MATERIAL, NON-PUBLIC INFORMATION AND THE PREVENTION OF INSIDER TRADING

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

JOINT CODE OF ETHICS FOR GOLUB CAPITAL BDC, INC. GOLUB CAPITAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION GC ADVISORS LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. v. Defendants.

C.~NoCV tl;[ 0'(_----- FILED. 20 ml ~R - 2 ~f4 II : l; 9. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNlA

Case 3:06-cv DMS-LSP Document 27 Filed 08/01/2007 Page 1 of 11

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Case 3:11-cv P Document 1 Filed 06/10/11 Page 1 of 7 PageID 1

Review for Exam 2. Instructions: Please read carefully

Case 3:10-cv K Document 1 Filed 08/31/10 Page 1 of 11 PageID 1

COUNT ONE (Securities Fraud)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Hon. Jose L. Linares INFORMATION

Code of Ethics Effective June 1, 2015

INTRODUCTION. At all times relevant to this Indictment, unless. 1. Donald & Co. Securities Inc. ("Donald & Co.") was

Focus on Securities Brokers:

Financial Market Efficiency and Its Implications

Case 8:13-cv SDM-AEP Document 1 Filed 04/05/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 0:13-cv WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/27/2013 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Hon. The defendant having waived in open court prosecution by Indictment, and the defendant having waived any defenses in open court based upon any

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

ALMONTY INDUSTRIES INC. INSIDER TRADING POLICY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA INDICTMENT COUNT ONE BACKGROUND

CHAPTER 11: THE EFFICIENT MARKET HYPOTHESIS

Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission"), for its Complaint against PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

INSIDER TRADING POLICY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.:

Corporate Policy and Procedure Insider Trading Bunge Limited

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT RULE 10B 5-1 PLANS

Review for Exam 1. Instructions: Please read carefully

IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, as amended. - and - EMPIRE CONSULTING INC. and DESMOND CHAMBERS

Case 3:15-cv D Document 1 Filed 11/10/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

CROCS, INC. Business Code of Conduct and Ethics Amended and Restated on February 18, 2008

Market Timing Schemes

SECURITIES TRADING AND INVESTMENT POLICY

J. G. DAY A 'CALL' OPTION

4:10-cv TLW Date Filed 03/18/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sanchez Energy Corporation. Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

The Margin Trading Rules, 2004

Fraud - Trading Commodity Futures

STATEMENT STUART F. DELERY ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL CIVIL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

A Basic Overview of Securities Regulation in British Columbia

IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, AS AMENDED. - and -

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 09/04/15 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 SEATTLE DIVISION

COUNT 1. The SPECIAL AUGUST 2012 GRAND JURY charges: a. Allscripts Healthcare Solutions, Inc. was a Chicago-based

Law Related to Fraud. Civil Justice System Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc.

Case 2:13-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/04/2013 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Leonard W. Vona, CPA, CFE

ROLE OF S.E.B.I. AS A REGULATORY AUTHORITY

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission"), for its Complaint against SUMMARY

Insider Trading Policy

1. This case involves widespread fraudulent conduct orchestrated by Shkreli from at

Substantive Requirements for a Registered Investment Adviser under the U.S. Investment Advisers Act of 1940

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Securities Law Compliance and Insider Trading Policy

It is a Criminal Offence to buy or sell the shares of any publicly listed company if you have inside information about that company.

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND. JOSEPH V. SMITH, * Case Number * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

How To Stop Mortgage Fraud In Minster

Market Microstructure: An Interactive Exercise

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. Plaintiff, v. Case No.: 4:13-CV-215. Defendant, COMPLAINT

MARK K. SCHONFELD (MS-2798) REGIONAL DIRECTOR

ORION ENGINEERED CARBONS S.A. INSIDER TRADING POLICY. All defined terms shall have the meanings set forth in the Annex A.

Transcription:

Lecture Notes 17 Market Efficiency I. Readings and Suggested Practice Problems II. What do we Mean by Efficiency? III. Why are we Interested in Market Efficiency? IV. Categories of Market Efficiency V. How Efficient are Financial Markets? VI. Additional Readings Buzz Words: Technical Analysis, Fundamental Analysis, Joint-Test Problem, Abnormal Returns, Insider Trading, Disclosure Rules. 1

I. Readings and Suggested Practice Problems A. Required: BKM, Chapter 12. B. Complementary Material: BKM, Chapter 13. Read Section 13.1, but only skim Sections 13.2 and 13.3. C. Suggested Problems Chapter 12: Problems 1-5, 14, 18, 19, 28 2

II. What do we Mean by Efficiency? The Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH): In an efficient market, prices reflect all available information. Notice that the level/degree/form of efficiency in a market depends on two dimensions: 1. The type of information incorporated into price (which information is available?). 2. The speed with which new information is incorporated into price ( how fast information is reflected?). 3

III. Why are we Interested in Market Efficiency? A. If market prices reflect at a given date only information of a particular type, then one can profit by trading based on information relevant for pricing but not yet reflected in prices. B. To assess the level of market efficiency need to know the security s value; which requires knowing how assets are priced. C. Joint-Test Problem in Empirical Tests of the EMH: Market Efficiency per se is not testable because the question whether price reflects a given piece of information always depends on the model of asset pricing that the researcher is using. It is always a joint test of market efficiency and the used pricing model. D. Despite the joint-test problem, tests of market efficiency, i.e., scientific search for inefficiencies, improves our understanding of the behavior of returns across time and securities. It helps to improve existing asset pricing models and the view and practices of financial-markets professionals. 4

IV. Categories of Market Efficiency A. Weak-Form Efficiency / Lack of Predictability 1. Price reflects all information contained in market trading data (past prices, volume, dividends, interest rates, etc.). 2. So an investor can not use past prices to identify mispriced securities. 3. Technical analysis: (1) Refers to the practice of using past patterns in stock prices (and trades) to identify future patterns in prices. (2) Is not profitable in a market which is at least weak form (i.e., weakly) efficient. B. Semi-Strong Form / Events Reflected Immediately 1. Price reflects all publicly available information. 2. So an investor can not use publicly available information to identify mispriced securities. 3. Fundamental analysis: (1) Refers to the practice of using financial statements, announcements, and other publicly available information about firms to pick stocks. (2) Is not profitable in a market which is at least semi-strong form (i.e., semi-strongly) efficient. 4. If a market is semi-strong form efficient, then it is also weak form efficient since past prices and other past trading data are publicly available. 5

Example: Market reaction to public announcement. Stock XYZ Mining closed yesterday at 100. Morning paper reports: XYZ Mining has larger than expected reserves (extra value = $10 per share). Suppose this estimate is unanimously and immediately deemed valid and accurate. Stock jumps to 110 immediately (at the open). (More likely 109.9 bid, 110.1 offered.) No trading is needed. News report XYZ climbed to 110 today on announcement of a new gold mine. Suppose XYZ Mining stock only jumps to 104: Report might be suspicious ( XYZ known to exaggerate ). But if we deem the information reliable... A price of 104 for XYZ does not accurately reflect all the available information. We can make trading profits by buying XYZ at 104 and holding until a. The market realizes we re right, or b. XYZ pays out (in dividends or distributions) the value of the reserves. (Semi-strong) efficiency is violated in the senses that 104 does not fully reflect the new information. We can make trading profits. 6

C. Strong-Form / All Private Information is Reflected Price reflects all available information. If a market is strong form efficient, then it is also semi-strong and weak form efficient since all available information includes past prices and publicly available information. 1. What is private information? Information that you hold that is not reflected in the market price: Two types of Private Information: a. Inside information Info known to company management but not yet made public. Knowledge of an impending takeover bid. Knowledge that earnings are going to be lower than the street expects. b. A private assessment based on public information. An analyst s report based on public accounting statements. 7

Example Private information can be impounded into the security price via reported trades. Stock XYZ Mining closed yesterday at 100. Opening quotes today are 99.9 bid; 100.1 offered. We overhear two geologists talking on the subway: XYZ Mining has larger than expected reserves (extra value = $10 per share). We begin to buy at the ask (100.1) Quotes revised to 100 bid, 100.2 offered. We buy more at 100.2. Quotes revised to 100.1 bid, 100.3 offered. Etc. We ll stop buying only when the price reaches 110. Market price will be 110, reflecting the private information. Market reaction is not driven directly by the private info, but instead by the related buying. Trader profits at the expense of other market participants (those who have exposed offers, either dealers or limit-order traders). 8

Qualifications Timing of trades unclear (all at once? spread out over time?) If more than one trader gets the info, most of the profits accrue to the one who trades first. Trader might be capital-constrained (might not have enough cash to buy all the stock that is offered below 110). 2. U.S. Securities Exchange Act Rule 10b-5 It shall be unlawful for any person, directly or indirectly, by the use of any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, (1) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud, (2) to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, or (3) to engage in any act practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security. 9

3. Corporate insiders Directors and officers of U.S. companies can trade that company s stock so long as: (1) The trades are not motivated by private information (in the sense described below). (2) They report their trades to the Securities and Exchange Commission. (3) They do not engage in short term trading. SEC publicizes these reports. 10

4. Insider trading: what is illegal? Are you prohibited from trading on everything that is not public knowledge? No! U.S. Supreme Court: Not every instance of financial unfairness constitutes fraudulent activity. a duty to disclose... does not arise from the mere possession of nonpublic market information Information is illegal if you obtained it by breach of a fiduciary duty, i.e., a relationship of trust. ( Misappropriation principle) Example: a WSJ reporter who traded on the basis of information in his Heard on the Street Column (before it was published). 5. Points to bear in mind You are not protected from prosecution simply because you are removed from the initial breach of trust. (In one case, the Feds caught the psychiatrist of the wife of the company president.) It might be tough to claim I didn t know. The SEC has ruled that for there to be a violation it is merely sufficient that the tippee know or have reason to know that [the information] was non-public and had been obtained improperly by selective revelation or otherwise. There are fewer and fewer countries that will not cooperate with U.S. authorities in investigating insider trading violations. 11

6. Example for 10b-5 Disclosure Cases XYZ Mining announces that the gold mine reserves were only half of the initial estimate. Stock price falls by $5. Donner, Blitzen and Associates (a member of the class action securities bar) immediately file a law suit. The initial complaint alleges that The company did not previously disclose all that it knew. This failure to disclose deprived investors who bought the stock (the class ) of relevant information. This failure cost these investors $100 Million. The complaint also asks that the attorneys be granted broad rights of discovery. What is the value of the information? To isolate the effect of the information, Donner, Blitzen estimates a market model for XYZ: r XYZ = α XYZ + β XYZ r M,t + e XYZ The value of the information is estimated as the residual e XYZ on the day of the disclosure. (e XYZ is also referred to as the abnormal return) Suppose that e XYZ on the day of the disclosure = -4% 12

Suppose that discovery shows that the company received initial estimates of the shortfall 10 days prior to the disclosure. The price per share at the start of the 10-day period was $100. The total trading volume over these 10 days was 5 Million shares. Damages sought = 4% (100) 5 Million = $20 Million. 13

V. How Efficient are Financial Markets? Bulk of evidence is that overall markets are efficient, i.e., the marginal benefits of acting on information (the profit to be made) do not exceed the marginal costs. So, do not blindly follow your broker s stock tips, they may be useless, and financially oriented online bulletins and chat-room recommendations may even contain misleading information!!! Still, There seem to be enough anomalies to warrant search for underpricing. Specifically, A. Technical Analysis (e.g., filter rules, neural networks, artificial intelligence, pattern recognition, etc.) is of no value for short-term investments, but may work for longer-term investments. B. Research in general also supports semi-strong form efficiency, but can find examples of semi-strong form inefficiency. C. Superior information and/or insight may earn money. VI. Additional Readings 14