Participant Handout: Team Dynamics Workshop



Similar documents
Stages of Team Development Lessons from the Struggles of Site-Based Management

Learning effectively through Groupwork

4 STAGES OF DEVELOPMENT Stage 1 Dependency and Inclusion o Inclusion o Dependence o Lack of structure o Centralized communication o High conformity

Group Dynamics. Sociological Criteria of a Group. Chapter

Group Development. How do groups change over time? Inga Carboni, 9/04

Chapter 3: Team Building

Team Building. HR can provide you with support for building effective team work.

Models of Small Group Development

Being Accountable in Work and Life

Forming, Storming, Norming, Performing and Adjourning

Having Conversations at Work that Work!

Teamwork/Leadership Reflection

Theories and Principles of Interpersonal Communication. Stephanie Kellogg

PREPARATION: - facilitator coordinates focus of panel, introduces and summarizes - briefs panel

Leading Self. Leading Others. Leading Performance and Change. Leading the Coast Guard

6 Essential Characteristics of a PLC (adapted from Learning by Doing)

LEADERSHIP TEAM DYNAMICS FACILITATOR S GUIDE

LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK

Conflict Analysis, Management and Resolution

Lesson 4 Resolving Family Conflicts

Communication and Problem Solving

Why Is This Topic So Important? Communication Styles: The Secret of Flexible Behavior. Considerations Regarding Communication

Teamwork in the Workplace

Total Quality Management

CSSE 372 Software Project Management: Human Side of Software Project Management

MINUTE TAKING. All material copyright of Lindsay Wright This pack is for sample purposes only, and not for re-use

CONDUCTING EFFECTIVE MEETINGS WORKBOOK A BASIC BUSINESS VICTORY GUIDE

Behavioral Interview Questions

Mediation Skills in Conflict Resolution

Managing Conflict How to Manage Interpersonal Conflict at Work. Overview. Leading Effectively Webinar Series

Team Dynamics in Process Simplification. Introduction to Process Improvement Slide 1

DESCRIBING OUR COMPETENCIES. new thinking at work

Managing Conflict. and Negotiation. Conflict. Conflict One party perceives its interests are being opposed or set back by another party.

THE BEHAVIORAL-BASED INTERVIEW

Shared Solutions: An Overview Special Education Policy and Programs Branch Ministry of Education

Accountability for Others being responsible for the consequences of the actions of those whom you manage.

Emotional Intelligence Style Report

Performance Factors and Campuswide Standards Guidelines. With Behavioral Indicators

Team Core Values & Wanted Behaviours

Why is this relevant? How will this help transition planning? Instructions. Conflict Management

Emotional Intelligence Self Assessment

Core Values Judge Certification Questions Answer Key

APPLICATIONS GUIDE. TRACOM Sneak Peek. Excerpts from. Improving Personal Effectiveness With Versatility

Leadership Development Handbook

Interview Questions. Accountability. Adaptability

Linked Core Abilities

Section 2: Ten Tools for Applying Sociology

Ten Tips for Facilitating Classroom Discussions on Sensitive Topics

Difficult Conversations: How to Discuss What Matters Most

How to Use Problem-Solving Simulations to Improve Knowledge, Skills, and Teamwork

Self Assessment Tool for Principals and Vice-Principals

Preceptor Orientation 1. Department of Nursing & Allied Health RN to BSN Program. Preceptor Orientation Program

What was the impact for you? For the patient? How did it turn out? How has this helped you in your job? What was the result?

TEAMS AND TEAMWORK Project Management and Leadership 2015

Facilitating and Coaching Teams: Tips and Techniques

Styles of Leadership

The Emotional Competence Framework

Chapter 3: Managing Conflict with Your Boss

Customer Service Management Training 101

Goal Setting. Your role as the coach is to develop and maintain an effective coaching plan with the client. You are there to

Chapter Thirteen. Informal and Formal Groups

Candidate Assessment Report. Chris Williams ABC Company

Conflicts of various types are a natural part of the team process.

How To Be A Team Member

Creating Agreement in Special Education

Unit 10. Group Dynamics. Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.

Management Performance Appraisal

The Wisconsin Comprehensive School Counseling Model Student Content Standards. Student Content Standards

Doc 1.5. Course: To Err is Human. Topic: Being an effective team player. Summary

Emotional Intelligence Why does it matter?

THE 7 HABITS OF HIGHLY EFFECTIVE PEOPLE By Stephen R. Covey

Generic Proposal Structure

Coaching. Outcomes: Participants gain an understanding and self-confidence in the basics of coaching and motivating others to perform their best;

EMPOWERING YOURSELF AS A COMMITTEE MEMBER

Conflict Management Styles

REACHING, SUPPORTING, & EMPOWERING IMMIGRANT FAMILIES Experiences of the Statewide Parent Advocacy Network (SPAN)

Dealing With Difficult People A Guide to Conflict Resolution. Presented by: Madonna Riley, PHR July 29, 2010

Alignment of the Career and Life Role Common Curriculum Goals with Career-Related Learning Standards Oregon Department of Education October 2002

Sample Examination Questions

Medical Interpreter Ethics. Copyright c Linda Golley 2008

A GUIDE TO STAFF DEVELOPMENT DIALOGUES (SDD)

INTERVIEW QUESTIONS. Behavioral Questions by Job Competency

Wiltshire Council s Behaviours framework

After the Reduction in Force: How to Re-Energize Your Team

LECTURE 7 THE HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Teamwork in Higher Education and Total Quality Management. Abstract

Module Five Critical Thinking

SDI Network Engineer Position Description

Need Information? Go to: Have Questions?

HOW TO BE A MORE EFFECTIVE LEADER By Renee L. Hoekstra, CVS

Team Building MARZIO ZANATO

6864 NE 14th Street, Suite 5 Ankeny, IA Toll free Dsm area Website ifapa@ifapa.

NEGOTIATION AND CONFLICT MANAGEMENT MBAD 6165-U90 Spring 2016

Cultural Intelligence - A concept for bridging and benefiting from cultural differences

Cooperative Learning What Is It?

BC Public Service Competencies

MANAGING CONFLICT: Your Survival Guide to Successful Negotiation & Conflict Resolution

Transcription:

Participant Handout: Team Dynamics Workshop Contents STAGES OF TEAM DEVELOPMENT... 2 Stage 1:Forming... 2 Stage 2: Storming... 2 Stage 3: Norming... 3 Stage 4: Performing... 4 Theories of Group Development... 4 Team Member Roles... 4 Task Roles... 5 Process Roles... 5 Task and Process Involvement... 7 Dysfunctional Team Member Behaviors... 8 Managing Team Conflict... 8 Causes of Team Conflict... 8 Conflict Management Strategies... 9 Productivity of a team Decision Making and Problem Solving... 9 Decision Making: One of the most critical applications of teamwork... 9 Problem Solving... 10 Self-Authorized Team Leadership... 10 Team Development Rating Form... 11 Team Dynamics, 2001 1

STAGES OF TEAM DEVELOPMENT When groups of people are first formed into a team, their roles and interactions are not established. Some individuals may merely act as observers while they try to determine what is expected from them while others may engage the process immediately. There are many models that describe team developmental progression. They are similar and suggest that the process occurs in four predictable stages. Each stage is characteristically different and builds on the preceding one; however, they do not need to occur sequentially. The implication is that if teams develop through these stages, they will be fully functional. Four stages Forming Storming Norming Performing Stage 1:Forming The Forming stage of team development is an exploration period. Team members are often cautions and guarded in their interactions, not really knowing what to expect from other team members. They explore the boundaries of acceptable behavior. Behaviors expressed in this early stage are generally polite and noncommittal. Some questions raised during this stage of development are: Do I want to be a part of this team? Will I be accepted as a member? Who is the leader? Is the leader competent? When you were a member of a team that worked well together, what is your recollection of the Forming stage? Stage 2: Storming The storming stage of development is characterized by competition and strained relationships among team members. There are various degrees of conflict that teams experience but basically the Storming stage deals with issues of power, leadership, and decision-making. Team Dynamics, 2001 2

Conflict cannot be avoided during this stage. It is the most crucial stage the team must work through. Some questions raised during this stage of development are: How will I seek my autonomy? How much control will I have over others? Who do I support? Who supports me? How much influence do I have? When you were a member of a team that worked well together, what is your recollection of the Storming stage? Stage 3: Norming The Norming stage of team development is characterized by cohesiveness among team members. After working through the Storming stage, team members discover that they in fact do have common interests with each other. They learn to appreciate differences and to work with them. The team is working better together. They solve problems together. Some questions raised during this stage of development are: What kind of relationships can we develop? Will we be successful as a team? How do we measure up to other teams? What is my relationship to the team leader? When you were a member of a team that worked well together, what is your recollection of the Norming stage? Team Dynamics, 2001 3

Stage 4: Performing The performing stage of team development is the result of working through the first three stages. By this time, team members have learned how to work together as a fully functioning team. They can define tasks. They can work out their relationships successfully. They are comfortable with and can manage conflicts. They implement and follow through with decisions and solutions to problems. When you were a member of a team that worked well together, what is your recollection of the Performing stage? Theories of Group Development The Tuckman Model i (Forming, Storming, Norming, and Performing) is generally accepted as the basic model of team development. It incorporates many aspects of the theories considered in this discussion and has remained relatively constant since it was introduced. Theorist Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4 Bennis- Sheppard Gibb Acceptance Data Flow Goals and Norms Control Schutz Inclusion Control Openness De-Inclusion Dependence Counter-Dependence Resolution Inter-Dependence Tuckman Forming Storming Norming Performing Awareness Conflict Cooperation Productivity Kormanski- Mozenter Varney Formation Building Working Maturity Team Member Roles When individuals come together to form a team, a number of dynamics occur simultaneously. Some members are goal oriented. Others spend more time working on interpersonal issues. As team development progresses, members settle into individual roles by mutual, usually unspoken, consent. These roles include both task and process areas. The task dynamic is identified by the what and why issues of the team s work. The process dynamic is the how dynamic that the team uses to facilitate task accomplishment. Team Dynamics, 2001 4

Task Roles Task roles include: Some task roles: Establishing the mission. Determining the operating principles. Setting goals. Establishing team member roles. Information giver Information seeker Initiator Opinion giver Elaborator Consensus seeker Clarifier Standard setter Representative Offers authoritative information or date. Asks for clarification or accuracy of statements. Makes suggestions or proposes new ideas. States belief or opinions relative to the discussion. Elaborates on ideas and suggestions, defines and redefines terms. Polls the group for its readiness to make decisions or resolve conflicts. Interprets or explains facts or opinions. Establishes criteria for evaluating opinions, ideas, or decisions. Reports the team s progress or actions outside the team. What task roles do you find yourself playing when you are a member of a team? Process Roles Process roles focus on: The team s needs for commitment, dependence, and involvement. Factors such as which team members talk, who solves conflicts and how. Some process roles: Encouraging Gatekeeping Listening Harmonizing Yielding Accepting Supporting Being open to others opinions or feelings even if they are different. Openly taking interest in what others say, and facilitating communication. Paying close attention to what others talk about. Negotiating or relieving tension when appropriate. Giving up an unpopular viewpoint and admitting mistakes. Respecting and promoting differences. Giving team members permission to feel good about their successes. What process roles do you find yourself playing when you are a member of a team? Team Dynamics, 2001 5

Team Dynamics, 2001 6

Task and Process Involvement Task roles have a tendency to dominate during the early stages of the team s development whereas process roles increase in their importance during the later stages of the process. As the team matures, task and process roles parallel each other in their importance, which contributes to the effective function of the team. Individual contribution subordinates itself to team effort. The team must acquire a balance of task and process functions if it is to realize its potential as a fully functioning team. High TASK PROCESS Medium Team Effort Low Individual Concerns Forming Storming Norming Performing Team Dynamics, 2001 7

Dysfunctional Team Member Behaviors Dysfunctional team member behaviors can impact the workflow of the team if not appropriately challenged. Some task behaviors can interfere with the team being able to accomplish its goal. Some process behaviors can prevent the team from developing a supportive climate. Some dysfunctional behaviors: Condescending Bullying Blocking Avoiding Withdrawing Joking Dominating Self-Seeking Putting down team member contributions as irrelevant Being inconsiderate of other team member s needs Arguing too much on a point and rejecting expressed ideas without consideration Not paying attention to facts or relevant ideas Acting passive or indifferent, wandering from the subject of discussion Excessive playing around, telling jokes, and mimicking other members Excessive talking, interrupting others, criticizing, and blaming Putting one s personal needs before the team s needs Managing Team Conflict Conflict is a daily reality for all team members. Team members needs and values inevitably come into conflict with the needs and values of others. The degree of a team s maturity can be measured by their acceptance of and ability to manage conflict. This is the most important skill that team members can develop. Causes of Team Conflict Personality differences Difference in values Difference in perspective Difference in goals Cultural differences Team Dynamics, 2001 8

Conflict Management Strategies Conflict means energy. This can be the most productive outcome of teamwork, or it can utterly destroy any productive possibility. Team members tend to react to conflict in five basic ways. They either compete, collaborate, avoid, accommodate, or compromise with one another. Competition Collaboration Avoidance Accommodation Compromise Competition is characterized by the need to win at all costs. It can be a win-lose situation with the need to dominate. Collaboration is characterized by a desire to satisfy all team members in a win-win situation Avoidance is characterized by attempts to distract attention from the issue or ignore it completely. Accommodation is characterized by the desire to please others at the expense of a person s own needs. Compromise is described by meeting the conflict at midpoint. Both parties in a dispute achieve some degree of satisfaction. Productivity of a team Decision Making and Problem Solving Decision Making: One of the most critical applications of teamwork Complex decisions require large amounts of information and involvement by all team members. Yes-and-no decisions involve two alternatives either to accept or reject the proposal. Single-course-of-action decisions involve determining whether the proposed measure should be implemented. One-alternative decisions are concerned with whether a measure should be adopted. Decision-Making Procedures Decision by authority occurs when the highest ranking authority within the team, usually the appointed team leader or manager, makes a unilateral decision. Decision by minority occurs when a small group of team members exert their influence over the majority of the team. Decision by majority occurs when a majority of team members agree. Decision by consensus means finding a proposal that is acceptable enough so that all team members can support it. Decision by unanimity occurs when all team members are in full agreement with the decision. This procedure is often confused with consensus decision-making. The team should make unanimous decisions when the team issues are important and affect all team members. Team Dynamics, 2001 9

Problem Solving One of the primary responsibilities of team membership is the ability to solve problems that impact the goals of the team. To be effective, team members must be able to identify problems and have a desire to resolve them. Trying to solve a problem without a systematic process is like trying to find your way in the wilderness without a good topographical map. Problem-Solving Steps Define the problem Identify the desired future state Identify the forces promoting change and the forces restraining change Analyze forces that can be changed Identify measures of success Plan the change strategy Develop the action plan Evaluate and follow up Self-Authorized Team Leadership Self-authorized team leadership is a form of accountable follower ship in which team members assume responsibility for their performance and their relationships with other team members. Self-authorized leadership is based on four assumptions: All team members practice some degree of self-authorized leadership. Self-authorized leadership is applicable to all team members. Not all team members are effective self-authorized leaders. Self-authorized leadership can be developed. Team Dynamics, 2001 10

Team Development Rating Form 1 Strongly agree 2 Disagree 3 Not sure 4 Agree 5 Strongly Agree 1 2 3 4 5 The team s purpose is clear and understandable. 1 2 3 4 5 Everyone is included in all aspects of team business. 1 2 3 4 5 It is comfortable to be in team meetings. 1 2 3 4 5 Team discussions are open and free spirited. 1 2 3 4 5 The team utilizes everyone s abilities to the fullest possible extent. 1 2 3 4 5 There is encouragement and support for team members. 1 2 3 4 5 The team deals with conflict in an open, supportive way. 1 2 3 4 5 Everyone has input to all team decisions. i Team Building by Reddy, W. and Jamison, K. 1988. San Diego, CA: NTL and University Associates Team Dynamics, 2001 11