WHAT IS RISK? Definition: probability of harm or loss Risk = Hazard x Exposure Risk can be voluntary or involuntary Interpretation of risk differs for



Similar documents
Risk-Based Decision Making for Site Cleanup

9.1 HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT

Probabilistic Risk Assessment Methodology for Criteria Calculation Versus the Standard (Deterministic) Methodology

USEPA Risk-Based Standards for Controlling Contaminated Sites Soil Screening Levels (SSLs) April 2, 2007 Aaron Yeow, USEPA

Module Three. Risk Assessment

Health Consultation Surface Soil and Vapor Intrusion Paone Property. Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida. EPA Facility ID: FL

Description Purpose Health Education. Health Assessment. Outcomes of the program Partners Contact Information

Health Consultation. Arkansas Plating Company Remediation Review

HEALTH. September 24, 2014

Supplemental Guidance to RAGS: Calculating the Concentration Term

VAPOR INTRUSION SCREENING LEVEL (VISL) CALCULATOR USER S GUIDE

Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund Volume I Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part A)

Letter Health Consultation

8. REGULATIONS AND ADVISORIES

Focus on Developing Surface Water Cleanup Standards Under the Model Toxics Control Act

Innovative Solutions Using Risk Assessment Tools as a Map for Site Portfolio Management

SUBCHAPTER 02S RULES AND CRITERIA FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE DRY-CLEANING SOLVENT CLEANUP FUND SECTION.0100 GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS

Introduction to Industrial Hygiene

Tier 3 Toxicity Value White Paper

Public Health Assessment

Variability and Uncertainty in Risk Estimation. for Brownfields Redevelopment

Focus on Developing Ground Water Cleanup Standards Under the Model Toxics Control Act

Wellmark International Dog Collar 34 g (1.2 oz) Cat Collar 10.5 g (0.37oz)

The Science of Chemical Safety Essential Toxicology - 4. Hazard and Risk. John Duffus & Howard Worth. IUPAC Educators Resource Material IUPAC

NON-CANCER HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT FROM EXPOSURE TO CYANIDE BY RESIDENT ADULTS FROM THE MINING OPERATIONS OF BOGOSO GOLD LIMITED IN GHANA

Alternate Concentration Limits/Groundwater Cleanup Levels. Title slide

U.S. EPA s Models for Establishing Cleanup Levels in Soil, Water, Buildings and Streets at Superfund Sites

Division of Public Health Services Office of the Assistant Director Public Health Preparedness Services

Revised Health Impact Assessment Recommendation Document for

Exposure and Control of Ten High Priority MSHA Contaminants in Metal Mines. Presented by: Shannon E. Newton, MPH, CIH

STATE OF MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT CLEANUP STANDARDS FOR SOIL AND GROUNDWATER JUNE INTERIM FINAL GUIDANCE (UPDATE No. 2.

Topic 11. Detailed Environmental Assessment of Chemical Process Flowsheets

Health Consultation PUBLIC COMMENT VERSION. Springstead and Hogtown Creek Sediments

DOCUMENTATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATOR DETERMINATION Interim Final 2/5/99 RCRA Corrective Action Environmental Indicator (EI) RCRIS code (CA725)

RAM LEATHER CARE SITE CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA EPA FACILITY ID: NCD JANUARY 31, 2006

Corporate Training. Occupational Safety, Health, and Environmental Management. Certificate Program. extension.uci.edu/corporate

Health Consultation. Report on the Feasibility of a Multi-site Analytic Follow-up Study

ITRC PROJECT PROPOSAL

ITALIAN GUIDELINES FOR THE APPLICATION OF RISK ASSESSMENT AT CONTAMINATED SITES

Health Consultation. COLLEGE GROVE RESIDENTIAL LEAD CONTAMINATION (a/k/a COLLEGE GROVE BATTERY CHIP SITE) COLLEGE GROVE, WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE

About Pure Earth and the Toxic Site Identification Program

SYNTHETIC TURF STUDY: OVERVIEW OF THE STUDY ELEMENTS

REACH Understanding the Risk Assessment Process

Regulatory Risk Assessment

2. determining that land is not contaminated land and is suitable for any use, and hence can be removed from the CLR or EMR, as relevant.

Manual Document Page Issue Date TABLE OF CONTENTS

HIGHLAND CREEK TREATMENT PLANT (HCTP) CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

Risk Assessment in Chemical Food Safety. Dept. of Food Safety and Zoonoses (FOS)

HEALTH CONSULTATION Brown Barge Middle School Pensacola, Escambia County, Florida

Experiencing REACH Exposure Assessments

Risk Assessment for Lead Exposure in Northwest Portion of Bernhart Park Reading, PA

by Haley & Aldrich, Inc. Boston, Massachusetts on behalf of ARE-MA Region No. 45, LLC Cambridge, Massachusetts Pasadena, California

What Environmental Lawyers Need to Know About Vapor Intrusion Gail Wurtzler and Bob Lawrence Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP Denver, Colorado

Comment of Consumer Reports Regarding Draft Guidance for Industry: Arsenic In Apple Juice Action Level Docket No. FDA-2012-D-0322

Developing Quality Assurance Project Plans using Data Quality Objectives and other planning tools. Developing QAPPs 5/10/2012 1

Exposure Modeling. Interpretation of biomonitoring data using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling. Centers for Human Health Assessment

Chemical Name: Acetone CAS: Synonyms: propanone, β-ketopropane, dimethyl ketone, dimethylformaldehyde, DMK, 2-propanone, propan-2-one

Manag.

Calculations and OELs

This document contains the Connecticut regulations concerning the Remediation Standard Regulations and the Environmental Land Use Restriction

Toxicity of Amphibole Asbestos

GPS Safety Summary. Cyclododeca-1,5,9-triene. Technical information. Substance name. Cyclododeca-1,5,9-triene CAS No

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY

PEER REVIEW DRAFT. Uncertainty in K ow : Implications for Risk Assessment and Remedial Decisions. Igor Linkov, * Michael Ames, Edmund Crouch

Summary of A Protocol for the Derivation of Environmental and Human Health Soil Quality Guidelines (CCME 2006)

Risk Management Procedure For The Derivation and Use Of Soil Exposure Point Concentrations For Unrestricted Use Determinations

Conservative versus Mean Risk Assessments: Implications for Superfund Policies*

Cornell Waste Management Institute

3. Quantitative Risk Assessment of Combined Exposure to Food Contaminants and Natural Toxins

Questions and Answers Regarding Eastman s Assistance in the Emergency Response to the Spill of Crude MCHM in Charleston, West Virginia

Proposed Remedial Action Plan for Operable Unit 10

August Prepared for: U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 10. Prepared by: WESTAT INC

Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS), Spill Clean-Up

1. PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION

1. PUBLIC HEALTH STATEMENT

WM 02 Conference, February 24-28, 2002, Tucson, AZ

SENTERNOVEM TASKGROUP SOIL+

Introduction. MassDEP, Office of Research and Standards 1 Tetrachloroethylene

Soil Cleanup Goals. Minnesota Department of Agriculture Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division. Guidance Document 19

Chemical Safety Assessment

Site-Wide Human Health Risk Assessment

OFF! CLIP-ON MOSQUITO REPELLENT

PUBLIC HEALTH ASSESSMENT GENERAL ELECTRIC SITE FORMER OXBOWS PITTSFIELD, BERKSHIRE COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS CERCLIS NO. MAD

Conversion template REACH dossier into GPS Safety Summary. 13 June 2013 Version 2: Final draft with comments

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET Utrecht Gesso Painting Grounds. Section 2 Hazard Identification (composition / information on ingredients)

Table of Contents for Section 8

How To Set Soil Cleanup Criteria For Trivalent And Hexavalent Chromium

Use of Alternate Concentration Limits (ACLs) to Determine Cleanup or Regulatory Levels Under RCRA and CERCLA

Health Assessment and Toxicology - Accident Hazard

1. Page 1, Incoming Soil Materials, Testing Frequency :

Cartridge Change Schedule

Fuel Oils. Public Health Statement for. June 1995

Inorganic mercury/ elemental mercury General information

Public Health Assessment R&H Oil Company CERCLIS NO. TXD & Tropicana Energy Company CERCLIS NO. TX

TESTIMONY OF DR. STEVEN BRADBURY DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Chapter 22: Overview of Ecological Risk Assessment

United Federation of Teachers A Union of Professionals. Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) in Fluorescent Light Fixtures March 2012

The MSDS format adheres to the standards and regulatory requirements of the United States and may not meet regulatory requirements in other countries.

Health Consultation SUMMARY OF RESULTS OF THE DUWAMISH VALLEY REGIONAL MODELING AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT SEATTLE, WASHINGTON JULY 14, 2008

DRAFT THE OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS POLICY DETERMINATION OF THE APPROPRIATE FQPA SAFETY FACTOR(S) FOR USE IN THE TOLERANCE-SETTING PROCESS

Transcription:

BASELINE RISK ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW Dawn A. Ioven Senior Toxicologist U.S. EPA Region III

WHAT IS RISK? Definition: probability of harm or loss Risk = Hazard x Exposure Risk can be voluntary or involuntary Interpretation of risk differs for each of us Predictive risk assessment (U.S. EPA) vs. health study (ATSDR, Health Department)

PURPOSE OF BASELINE RISK ASSESSMENT Characterize current and potential future risks to human health and the environment Determine the need for remedial action Aid stakeholders in understanding potential site-related risks Satisfy Federal regulations requiring the assessment of risk at Superfund sites

BASELINE RISK ASSESSMENT PROCESS Hazard Identification Exposure Assessment Toxicity Assessment Risk Characterization Uncertainty Analysis

HAZARD IDENTIFICATION Gather and analyze relevant site data Identify Chemicals of Potential Concern (CoPCs) CoPCs are chemicals that may contribute significantly to site-related risks Determined by comparison to generic risk-based screening levels or regulatory criteria Identification process also considers essentiality, frequency of detection, and background conditions

EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Analyze contaminant releases Identify potentially-exposed exposed populations (current and future) Identify potential exposure pathways Estimate exposure point concentrations for CoPCs Estimate contaminant intakes for CoPCs (dose or exposure concentration)

EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT (cont.) Common Land-Use Scenarios Residential Occupational Commercial / Industrial Construction Recreational Other Agricultural Trespassing Maintenance (Landscaping)

EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT (cont.) Common Exposure Pathways Surface soil Subsurface soil Ground water Air Surface water Sediment

EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT (cont.) Common Exposure Routes Ingestion Soil Ground water Surface water Sediment Dermal contact Soil Ground water (bathing) Surface water Sediment Inhalation Soil (outdoor vapors, airborne particulate, vapor intrusion) Ground water (showering, vapor intrusion) Air

EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT (cont.) Generic Dose Equation - Ingestion Dose = (C x CR x EF x ED) / (BW x AT) where: C = contaminant concentration, media-dependentdependent CR = contact rate, media-dependentdependent EF (days/yr) = exposure frequency ED (yrs) = exposure duration BW (kg) = body weight AT (days) = averaging time Generic Dose Equation - Inhalation Exposure Concentration = (CA x ET x EF x ED x CF) / AT where: CA (ug/m 3 ) = contaminant concentration in air ET (hrs/day) = exposure time EF (days/yr) = exposure frequency ED (yrs) = exposure duration CF (1 day/24 hrs) = conversion factor AT (days) = averaging time

TOXICITY ASSESSMENT Collect qualitative and quantitative toxicity information for CoPCs Determine appropriate toxicity values for CoPCs to estimate risks Reference Dose (RfD) Inhalation Reference Concentration (RfC) Carcinogenic Slope Factor (CSF) Inhalation Unit Risk (IUR)

RISK CHARACTERIZATION Combine Exposure Assessment with Toxicity Assessment to describe potential for adverse health effects

Cancer Risks RISK CHARACTERIZATION (cont.) Risk = CSF x Dose where: CSF (mg/kg/day) - 1 = Carcinogenic Slope Factor Risk = IUR x EC where: IUR (ug/m 3 ) - 1 = Inhalation Unit Risk, chemical-specific EC (ug/m 3 ) = exposure concentration Non-Cancer Risks HQ = Dose / RfD where: HQ (unitless) = Hazard Quotient RfD (mg/kg/day) = Reference Dose HQ = EC / (RfC x 1000 ug/mg) where: HQ (unitless) = Hazard Quotient EC (ug/m 3 ) = exposure concentration RfC (mg/m 3 ) = Reference Concentration, chemical-specific

RISK CHARACTERIZATION Unacceptable Risk (cont.) Excess cancer risk greater than 1E-04 probability of developing cancer from defined exposure is greater than 1 in 10,000 For non-cancer impacts, sum of HQs for similar target organs is greater than 1 safe dose is exceeded

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS Describe assumptions and significant unknowns associated with risk assessment process Quantitative measure of variability and sensitivity of each input parameter can be performed via Monte Carlo Analysis

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL RISK ASSESSMENT PARADIGM Risk Assessment Dose-Response Assessment Hazard Identification Exposure Assessment Risk Characterization Statutory and Legal Considerations Public Health Considerations Control Options Economic Factors Regulatory Decisions Social Factors National Research Council, 1983 Risk Management