As grain prices fluctuate



Similar documents
Introduction. Introduction Nutritional Requirements. Six Major Classes of Nutrients. Water 12/1/2011. Regional Hay School -- Bolivar, MO 1

NUTRIENT SPECIFICATIONS OF TURKEY WASTE MATERIAL

PRODUCING WHEY SILAGE FOR GROWING

FEEDING THE DAIRY COW DURING LACTATION

Feeding Corn to Beef Cows

Sheep Nutrition. Sheep Nutrition. Nutrient Needs. Sheep Nutrition Water. Products Produced. Use of Pasture\Range and Forages.

Feedlot Lamb Nutrition

How To Feed Cows In The Winter

6/29/ TDN

Payback News. Beef Cows-The Cheapest Mineral Isn t

Land O Lakes Feed DDGS. Nutrients Concentrate: United States Ethanol Outlook. A Growing Opportunity

Effect of Flaxseed Inclusion on Ruminal Fermentation, Digestion and Microbial Protein Synthesis in Growing and Finishing Diets for Beef Cattle

Creep Feeding Beef Calves Dan E. Eversole, Extension Animal Scientist, Virginia Tech

BURNETT CENTER INTERNET PROGRESS REPORT. No. 12 April, Summary of the 2000 Texas Tech University Consulting Nutritionist Survey

Feeding Value of Sprouted Grains

Distillers Grains for Beef Cattle

CORN BY-PRODUCTS IN DAIRY COW RATIONS

Corn Stalks and Drought-Damaged Corn Hay as Emergency Feeds for Beef Cattle

AN ACCELERATED FEEDING STUDY

ALFALFA FOR BEEF COWS

Summary of Distillers Grains Feeding Recommendations for Beef

Selenium and Selenium Yeast Use in Feed. Division of Regulatory Services University of Kentucky April 25, 2005

ROLLED VERSUS WHOLE CORN: EFFECTS ON RUMINAL FERMENTATION OF FEEDLOT STEERS

BEC Feed Solutions. Steve Blake BEC Feed Solutions

Understanding Feed Analysis Terminology

Fertility Guidelines for Hops in the Northeast Dr. Heather Darby, University of Vermont Extension Agronomist

Pasture Forage Quality in West Virginia

Alternative Feeds for Beef Cattle

Grouping to Increase Milk Yield and Decrease Feed Costs

Beef Cattle Frame Scores

Grain Finishing Beef: Alternative Rations, Cattle Performance and Feeding Costs for Small Feeders

THE EVALUATION OF DISTILLERS CO-PRODUCTS IN DAIRY BEEF PRODUCTION

Beef Cattle Handbook

PROCESSING OF WHEAT FOR GROWING-FINISHING SWINE

Optimal livestock diet formulation with farm environmental compliance consequences. Joleen Hadrich, Christopher Wolf. and.

Ethanol Usage Projections & Corn Balance Sheet (mil. bu.)

Mineral and Vitamin Supplementation of Beef Cows in Arkansas

Protein and Energy Supplementation to Beef Cows Grazing New Mexico Rangelands

EFFECT OF AGRADO ON THE HEALTH AND PERFORMANCE OF TRANSPORT-STRESSED HEIFER CALVES. Authors:

NITRATES IN LIVESTOCK FEED

Effects of Supplemental Vitamin E with Different Oil Sources on Growth, Health, and Carcass Parameters of Preconditioned Beef Calves 1

Effective Fiber for Dairy Cows

How Profitable is Backgrounding Cattle? Dr. John Lawrence and Cody Ostendorf, Iowa State University

CREEP FEEDING BEEF CALVES

CODEX STANDARD FOR FOLLOW-UP FORMULA CODEX STAN This standard applies to the composition and labelling of follow-up formula.

Increasing Profitability Through an Accelerated Heifer Replacement Program

Minerals. by Dr. Rick Machen Associate Professor & Extension Livestock Specialist Texas Agric ultural Exte nsio n Service, Uvalde

Comparison of Software Applications for Formulating Dairy Rations

WHAT IS IN FERTILIZER OTHER THAN NUTRIENTS?

Creep Feeding Beef Calves

Feed Management Plan Template ( ) Address: Address: Town, State, Zip: Homer City. Farm Name: Phone: Fax:

MINERAL NUTRITION OF BEEF CATTLE

Nutrition Guide For Bobwhite Quail Production

Uses and Abuses of NIR for Feed Analysis

Understanding the. Soil Test Report. Client and Sample Identification

Livestock Budget Estimates for Kentucky

DETERMINING YOUR STOCKING RATE

The A to Z of Meat Goat Production

Accelerated Replacement Heifer Feeding Programs

Energy in the New Dairy NRC. Maurice L. Eastridge 1 Department of Animal Sciences The Ohio State University

Focus on Preventing Disease. keeping an eye on a healthy bottom line. Cattle Industry

MANAGING THE EFFECTS OF MOLDS AND MYCOTOXINS IN RUMINANTS

Feeding Flood-Damaged or Sprouted Crops to Livestock

The Basics of Fertilizer Calculations for Greenhouse Crops Joyce G. Latimer, Extension Specialist, Greenhouse Crops; Virginia Tech

Lesson Title: Beef Cattle-Animal Care is Everywhere Grade Level: K-4 Time: 1 hour Content Area: Science, Language Arts Objectives:

Guidelines for Estimating. Beef Cow-Calf Production Costs in Manitoba

Beef Cattle Feed Efficiency. Dan Shike University of Illinois

Beef Cattle Breeds and Biological Types Scott P. Greiner, Extension Animal Scientist, Virginia Tech

Nutrient and Fertilizer Value of Dairy Manure

REPRODUCTION AND BREEDING Influence of Nutrition on Reproduction in the Beef Cow Herd

A SNAPSHOT OF ALPENA COUNTY

Forage Crises? Extending Forages and Use of Non-forage Fiber Sources. Introduction

LAB 5 - PLANT NUTRITION. Chemical Ionic forms Approximate dry Element symbol Atomic weight Absorbed by plants tissue concentration

POISON KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN READ SAFETY DIRECTIONS BEFORE OPENING OR USING FOR ANIMAL TREATMENT ONLY. As an aid in the control of bloat.

COLD STRESS IN COWS. Brian Tarr, Ruminant Nutritionist Shur Gain, Nutreco Canada Inc.

How Do I Select Quality Hay?

R E S T R I C T E D B R E E D I N G A N D R O T A T I O N A L G R A Z I N G

Understanding CNCPS and CPM: Biology, Modeling, and Best Cost Applications for Balancing the Nutrient Requirements in Dairy Diets

Summary. Keywords: methanol, glycerin, intake, beef cattle. Introduction

The Effect of Citric Acid, Phytase, and Their Interaction on Gastric ph, and Ca, P, and Dry Matter Digestibilities

STATE FFA DAIRY EVALUATION CAREER DEVELOPMENT EVENT KNOWLEDGE TEST

LIFE STAGES. DOG and CAT FOODS. Give your pet the natural, wholesome nutrition needed for all-day activity and a lifetime of fitness and health

FACILITIES FOR FEEDING HOLSTEIN AND BEEF CATTLE

Hill s Evidence-Based Clinical Nutrition for Dermatology Specialists

The Costs of Raising Replacement Heifers and the Value of a Purchased Versus Raised Replacement

NUTRITION MANAGEMENT OF PREGNANT AND LACTATING MARES

AN EVALUATION OF DEXTROSE, LACTOSE, AND WHEY SOURCES IN PHASE 2 STARTER DIETS FOR WEANLING PIGS 1

Corn Silage Gary Bates, Associate Professor, Plant and Soil Science

Body Condition, Nutrition and Reproduction of Beef Cows

How To Run A Blade Farming Scheme

Managing of Annual Winter Forages in Southwest Texas

Practical Beef Cattle Nutrition

Nutrition Requirements

Digestive System of the Horse and Feeding Management

Strategies for Diet Formulation with High Corn Prices

Sulfur deficiency in corn Jim Camberato, Stephen Maloney, and Shaun Casteel 1 Agronomy Department, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN

What is the Cattle Data Base

Transcription:

MICHIGAN STATE U N I V E R S I T Y EXTENSION Extension Bulletin E-3074 New December 2009 Incorporating Distiller s Grain in Beef Cattle Diets As grain prices fluctuate over time, beef cattle producers consider alternative sources of protein and energy. Atop the list of alternative feedstuffs is corn distiller s grain (DG), a co-product of the ethanol industry. Distiller s grain originates from corn grain and presents an opportunity to substitute both energy and protein. Using DG in diets does create some challenges, such as differences in particle size and moisture, as well as sulfur, protein, fat and nutrient content of the diet. Differences in ethanol production methods result in differences in composition of the co-products, especially the phosphorus and sulfur content. Moisture content also varies depending on the amount of drying, resulting in dried distiller s grain (DDG) or modified-wet distiller s grain (MDG). Solubles may also be added, resulting in DDGS and MDGS. Variation in composition of products among plants and within each plant is common. Table 1 shows the average composition of co-products available at five Michigan ethanol plants. This document was prepared by Barbara Casey, Dan Buskirk and Steven Rust. 1

Table 1. Differences in percent composition of distiller s grain across Michigan.* Dry TDN Crude Fat Calcium Phosphorus Sulfur Potassium Sodium matter (%) protein (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) Plant 1 DDGS 90.13 84 30.81 11.90-0.89 0.58-0.25 Plant 2 DDGS 89.44 84.32 34.46 10.88 0.03 0.95 0.71 1.09 0.13 MDGS 53.37 85.89 33.33 12.01 0.03 0.95 0.75 1.13 0.2 Plant 3 DDGS 90.1 76.70 31.95 11.65 0.025 0.82 0.88 1.00 0.28 MDGS 49.9 77.15 30.50 12.30 0.025 0.83 0.87 1.01 0.29 Plant 4 DDGS 89.43 90.1 33.98 12.65 0.025 0.83 0.94 1.07 0.24 MDGS 46.43 88.97 33.00 12.97 0.03 0.89 0.97 1.11 0.25 Plant 5 DDGS 90.2-29.9 11.4 0.05 0.94 1.01 1.23 0.24 Average DDGS 89.86 83.78 32.22 11.70 0.03 0.87 0.82 1.10 0.23 Average MDGS 49.90 84.00 32.28 12.43 0.03 0.89 0.86 1.08 0.25 * All data reported on a dry matter basis except DM. Data obtained from specification sheets provided by each refinery (May-July 2008). Contact your local ethanol refinery for the latest analysis and information on purchasing DG. Feeding high levels of DG in beef cattle diets can create animal health and environmental challenges. Including distiller s grain in amounts greater than 20% of the ration dry matter (DM) may lead to environmental concerns due to excess nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and sulfur (S) in the diet. All supplemental phosphorus and sulfur should be removed from the diet. Depending on the diet, sodium (Na) and potassium (K) may also be removed. Frequently, the amount of DG fed is limited by the amount of sulfur in the total diet. The maximum tolerable level of sulfur (S) is 0.4% of the diet (NRC, 1996). A diet that contains 40% DG that has a 1% S content will exceed that level. If more than 30% DG is being fed, a water analysis for S content is recommended. Animals consuming sulfur amounts above the recommended levels are at risk to contract Bovine Polioencephalomalacia. This is also referred to as polio in cattle and is a disease of sulfur toxicity or thiamine deficiency resulting in blindness, incoordination and sudden death. The inclusion level of DG in rations can also be limited by the total level of fat in the diet. As a rule of thumb, total fat content of the ration should not exceed 6 to 8% of the diet. Fat levels greater than this can lead to lowered feed intake and reduced performance. Supplementation of Minerals and Vitamins Because of the composition of DG, including it in the diet means that the level of supplemental minerals and vitamins needed will change significantly. It is critical that beef cattle diets be thoroughly evaluated for mineral and vitamin levels to prevent nutritional deficiency and toxicity problems. One essential level that should be monitored in all diets is the ratio of calcium to phosphorus. It is recommended that this ratio be 1.5 to 1 or greater. Additional calcium should be added to the diet; limestone is a common and inexpensive source of calcium. When possible, the amount of sulfur in 2

the supplement should be reduced when high levels of DG are fed. Sample supplements for feedlot cattle and cow diets containing DG are shown in Tables 2 and 9, respectively. Many commercial supplements are also available and are labeled for use in DG diets. Feedlot Operations The fact that feedlots tend to feed the least cost ration results in high inclusion levels of DG. It is essential to evaluate mineral and vitamin content closely to maintain proper growth and feed efficiency. Levels of sulfur greater than.25% of the diet dry matter (DM) can reduce the availability of copper. Vitamins A, D and E are also essential and should be monitored closely to ensure that supplementation is adequate. All rations presented in the following tables contain a mineral supplement developed by Michigan State University for use with rations containing DG. This supplement was designed to be used in diets with 10 to 50% of the total DM as DG. The composition is listed in Table 2. This supplement contains Rumensin and was calculated for a feedlot steer consuming 22 lb DM/ day with the supplement added at 4% of the ration DM. The calculated monensin intake is 300 mg/head/ day. A steer consuming 18 pounds of DM would obtain 250 mg of monensin per day. Tables 3-8 illustrate examples of beef cattle feed rations that can be used for both grower and finisher diets. The rations are utilizing MDGS to meet all supplemental N needs or as replacement for a portion of corn in the diet. When interpreting these tables, please take note that levels will vary depending on the DM intake as a percent of total body weight (BW). Cow/Calf Operations Although distiller s grain (DG) can be an excellent feedstuff for cows and calves, availability and storage are challenges for cow/calf operations unless an operation is close to an ethanol plant. Wet distiller s grain with solubles (WDGS) and modified-wet distiller s grain (MDGS) are typically shipped in 26-ton truckload lots. This should be fed within 5 to 12 days because of the risk of spoilage. For longer term storage, WDGS and MDGS can be stored in sealed piles or horizontal silos. It is important to exclude oxygen to prevent spoilage. Dry distiller s grain (DDGS) is easier to store than WDGS and MDGS. DDGS can be stored for longer periods of time and, therefore, can be better utilized by small operations. DDGS has a fine particle size and is susceptible to wind erosion. Therefore, it should be covered during storage. Because cow/calf producers are more likely to utilize DDGS than WDGS or MDGS, the rations listed in Tables 10 and 11 contain only DDGS. In beef cow operations, it is common for distiller s grain to be used as a protein and energy supplement in diets containing low-quality forage. Special care should be taken in evaluating which ration to use for your herd on the basis of desired DM intake (DMI), breed, mature cow weight and stage of gestation. Table 2. Michigan State University supplement composition for grower and finisher diets containing distiller s grain.* Dry matter Inclusion rate, Inclusion rate, Amount, content, % % of DM % As-fed lb/ton Ground corn 86 7.8 8.7 173.5 Limestone 100 71.7 70.7 1413 TM premix** 99 2.4 2.4 47 Vitamin E 99 0.05 0.06 1 TM salt 99 17.9 17.8 357 Rumensin 80 100 0.4 0.4 8.5 Total - 100 100 2000 *Composition of supplement based on dry matter content of individual feedstuffs. **Akey TM Premix #4. 3

Table 3. MDGS replaces all supplemental crude protein in the diet: feedlot grower ration for an animal weighing 500-600 lb (MDGS=16.5% of ration on a DM basis).* % DM DM As-fed 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 Corn 88 45 6.2 7.0 5.6 6.2 6.8 7.3 Corn silage 35 34.5 4.7 13.5 10.8 11.9 13.0 14.1 MDGS 49.9 16.5 2.3 4.5 3.6 4.0 4.4 4.7 MSU supplement 98.6 4 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 Total as-fed 25.6 20.5 22.6 24.7 26.7 Total DM intake 13.8 11 12.1 13.2 14.3 *Ration DM content: 53.5%. Table 4. MDGS used as an energy source in the diet: feedlot grower ration for an animal weighing 500-600 lb (MDGS=30% of ration on a DM basis).* % DM DM As-fed 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 Corn 88 32 4.4 5.0 4.0 4.4 4.8 5.2 Corn silage 35 34 4.7 13.3 10.7 11.8 12.8 13.9 MDGS 49.9 30 4.4 8.8 6.6 7.3 7.9 8.6 MSU supplement 98.6 4 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 Total as-fed 27.7 21.8 24.0 26.0 28.3 Total DM intake 14.1 11 12.1 13.2 14.3 *Ration DM content: 50.6%. It is important to feed cows and developing heifers differently on the basis of their nutritional demands. Ensuring that calcium, minerals and vitamins are sufficient for gestation and lactation is essential. Factors of growth, gestation and lactation have been included in Tables 10 and 11. All of these rations have been formulated using the sample supplement shown in Table 9. This supplement has been formulated to minimize both phosphorus and sulfur content. Because of availability and cost of alternative sources of nutrients, not all sulfur sources were removed from this supplement. When using commercial supplements, be sure that they are labeled for use in cow/heifer diets. 4

Table 5. MDGS used as an energy source in the diet: feedlot grower ration for Holstein calves weighing 300-500 lb (MDGS=30% of ration on a DM basis).* Table 6. MDGS replaces all supplemental crude protein in the diet: feedlot finisher ration for an animal weighing 800-1,300 lb (MDGS=10% of ration on a DM basis).* % DM DM As-fed 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 Corn 88 83 17.1 19.4 17.8 19.8 21.8 23.8 Corn silage 35 3 0.6 1.7 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 MDGS 49.9 10 2.1 4.1 3.8 4.2 4.6 5.1 MSU supplement 98.6 4 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 1.0 Total as-fed 26.0 24.0 26.7 29.3 32.1 Total DM intake 20.6 18.9 21 23.1 25.2 *Ration DM content: 78.9%. % DM DM As-fed 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 Corn 88 36 4.0 4.6 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.3 Corn silage 35 30 3.4 9.6 6.9 7.5 8.2 8.9 MDGS 49.9 30 3.6 7.2 4.8 5.3 5.8 6.3 MSU supplement 98.6 4 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 Total as-fed 21.9 15.3 16.8 18.3 19.9 Total DM intake 11.5 8.0 8.8 9.6 10.4 *Ration DM content: 52.2%. Table 7. MDGS used as an energy source in the diet: feedlot finisher ration for an animal weighing 800-1,300 lb (MDGS=30% of ration on a DM basis).* % DM DM As-fed 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 5 Corn 88 58.5 12.1 13.7 12.6 14.0 15.4 16.8 Corn silage 35 7.5 1.6 4.4 4.1 4.5 5.0 5.4 MDGS 49.9 30 6.0 12.0 11.4 12.6 13.9 15.2 MSU supplement 98.6 4 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 1.0 Total as-fed 30.9 28.9 32.0 35.2 38.4 Total DM intake 20.5 18.9 21 23.1 25.2 *Ration DM content: 65.9%.

Table 8. MDGS used as an energy source in the diet: feedlot finisher ration for an animal weighing 800-1,300 lb (MDGS=40% of ration on a DM basis).* % DM DM As-fed 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 Corn 88 46 9.5 10.8 9.9 10.9 12.1 13.2 Corn silage 35 10 2.1 5.9 5.4 6 6.6 7.2 MDGS 49.9 40 8.0 15.9 15.2 16.8 18.5 20.2 MSU supplement 98.6 4 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 1.0 Total as-fed 33.4 31.3 34.6 38.1 41.6 Total DM intake 20.4 18.9 21 23.1 25.2 *This ration contains levels of sulfur higher than recommended (NRC, 1996). Ration DM content: 60.8%. Table 9. Mineral/vitamin supplement composition for use in cow diets containing distiller s grain.* Nutrient concentration in supplement, required per in ingredient as-fed % ton of supplement, lb White salt 39% Na 26.9 537 Limestone 34% Ca 23.7 475 Magnesium oxide 57% Mg 17.6 353 Manganese sulfate 32% Mn 1.2 23.3 Zinc sulfate 35.5% Zn 0.9 17.8 Copper sulfate 25.2% Cu 0.4 8.0 Sodium selenite 1.6% Se 0.2 4.7 EDDI** 79.5% I 0.01 0.2 Cobalt sulfate 33% Co 0.01 0.2 Vitamin A 650 650,000 IU/g 0.09 1.72 Vitamin E 1,000 IU/g 0.2 3.8 Oil - 1.3 25 Sweetener 7.5 150 Grain or byproduct - 20.0 400 carrier Total 100 2000 *Average daily supplement consumption formulated to be 79.0 g/hd (0.174 lb). **Ethylenediamine dihydroiodide. 6

Table 10. Rations formulated for a developing beef heifer weighing 550-800 lb with desired weight gain of 1.75 lb/day (assume no environmental stress factors included). dry matter Amount as-fed, lb/hd/d content, % Sample diet 1 Sample diet 2 Corn silage 35-36.5 DDGS 90 6 4 Corn grain 88 5 - Medium quality mixed hay 92 8 - MSU supplement 100 0.2 0.2 Limestone 100 0.2 0.2 Total lb as-fed - 19.4 40.9 Table 11. Rations formulated for a British x Continental cow with a mature weight of 1,350 lb and estimated calf birth weight of 90 lb (assume no environmental stress factors included)., Amount as-fed, lb/hd/d DM % Mid Mid Mid gestation Late gestation Late gestation gestation (limit-fed) (limit-fed) gestation Corn silage 35 - - - 30 - DDGS 90 3.5 6 5 4 5 Medium quality Grass hay 92 21-16 9 24 Corn stalks 75-26 - - - MSU Supplement 100 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Total lb as-fed - 25 32 21 43 29 Suppliers of Distiller s Grains and Contact Information Supplier Address Telephone Andersons Ethanol, LLC 26250 B Drive North 1-800-537-3370 Albion, MI 49224 Global Ethanol 7025 Silberhorn Hwy 517-486-6190 Blissfield, MI 49228 POET Biorefining 1551 Empire Drive 989-672-1222 Caro, MI 48723 Marysville Ethanol, LLC 2510 Busha Highway 810-364-8100 Marysville, MI 48040 Carbon Green 7795 Saddlebag Lake Rd Cenex Harvest Services BioEnergy, LLC Lake Odessa, MI 48849 1-800-769-1066 7

For additional information or further assistance in formulating beef cattle rations containing distiller s grain, please contact the Beef AoE educator in your region. Ben Bartlett E3774 University Dr. Chatham, MI 49816 (906) 439-5880 bartle18@msu.edu Kevin Gould 50 East Sprague Road Ionia, MI 48846 (616) 527-5357 gouldk@msu.edu Jeannine Schweihofer 1142 South Van Dyke, Suite 200 Bad Axe, MI 48413 (989) 269-9949, ext. 612 grobbelj@msu.edu Fred Hinkley 205 S. Eighth West Branch, MI 48661 (989) 345-0692 hinkley@msu.edu Maury Kaercher 612 E. Main Street Centreville, MI 49032 (269) 467-5511 kaercher@msu.edu Jerry Lindquist 301 W. Upton Avenue Reed City, MI 49677 (231) 832-6139 lindquis@msu.edu Matt Shane 1040 S. Winter St. Suite #2020 Adrian, MI 49221-3869 (517) 264-5308 shanemat@msu.edu Frank Wardynski 725 Greenland Road Ontonagon, MI 49953 (906) 884-4386 wardynsk@msu.edu MICHIGAN STATE U N I V E R S I T Y EXTENSION MSU is an affirmative-action, equal-opportunity employer. Michigan State University Extension programs and materials are open to all without regard to race, color, national origin, gender, gender identity, religion, age, height, weight, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, marital status, family status or veteran status. Issued in furtherance of MSU Extension work, acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Thomas G. Coon, Director, MSU Extension, East Lansing, MI 48824. This information is for educational purposes only. Reference to commercial products or trade names does not imply endorsement by MSU Extension or bias against those not mentioned. 8