Case 2: 15-cv-03174-JFW-FFM Document 16 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:248 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA



Similar documents
Case5:09-cv JF Document30 Filed03/04/10 Page1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 07/14/15 Page 1of10 Page ID #:1

Case 1:08-cv WMS Document 2 Filed 12/23/2008 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 3:15-cv LAB-BLM Document 1 Filed 03/16/15 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

State of California Department of Corporations

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY Third Judicial District Of Kansas Chadwick J. Taylor, District Attorney

Case 1:14-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 05/13/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

LEGAL NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

State of California Department of Business Oversight

Case: 4:15-cv Doc. #: 1 Filed: 09/29/15 Page: 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSIOURI EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

October 15, Re: Flores, et al., v. Holder, et al., No. CV (C.D. Cal.).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Nee, Shane Quentin, Greggory Moore, and the National Photographers Rights Organization

How To Settle A Lawsuit Against The City Of Naperville

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CASE NO. 1:12-CV-1179

How To Get A Court Order To Stop A Man From Selling A Car To A Woman

Case 6:13 cv Document 1 Filed 10/03/13 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

Case 1:13-cv Doc #1 Filed 09/30/13 Page 1 of 8 Page ID#1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 3:06-cv MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION CONSENT DECREE. WHEREAS: Plaintiff, the United States of America, has

Plaintiffs, -against- IAS Part 5 Justice Kathryn E. Freed. WHEREAS Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General of the State of New York

Case 2:06-cv FCD-KJM Document 220 Filed 06/02/2009 Page 1 of 11

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Mirkarimi v. Nevada Property 1 LLC dba The Cosmopolitan of Las Vegas S.D. Cal. Case No. 12-cv BTM (DHB)

CERTIFICATE OF REHAB. & PARDON INSTRUCTION FORMS PACKET

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Whereas this civil forfeiture action (the "California Action") was filed on

NPSA GENERAL PROVISIONS

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case4:13-cv SBA Document40 Filed10/14/14 Page1 of 11

Case 3:14-cv H-JMA Document 1 Filed 03/24/14 Page 1 of 11. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Michael Gayoso, Jr. Office of the County Attorney TH

The two sides disagree on how much money, if any, could have been awarded if Plaintiffs, on behalf of the class, were to prevail at trial.

Case 3:06-cv MJR-DGW Document 500 Filed 04/30/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #13368

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

NOTICE TO ALL APPLICANTS FOR A PER DIEM JUDGE POSITION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS PEORIA DIVISION

A. Arizona School Risk Retention Trust ("Trust").

Case 3:14-cv MMD-VPC Document 12-1 Filed 02/12/14 Page 1 of 14 EXHIBIT 1

CALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION

APPROVED Movant shall serve copies of this ORDER on

BEFORE THE FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA COMPLAINT

The St. Paul Companies, Inc. Securities Litigation. c/o The Garden City Group, Inc.

Case 2:02-cv TS Document 602 Filed 06/19/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MANATEE COUNTY, FLORIDA. Plaintiff, Case No CA-1845 PROPOSAL FOR SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Chapter 153. Violations and Fines 2013 EDITION. Related Laws Page 571 (2013 Edition)

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case 1:15-cv WSD Document 3 Filed 06/04/15 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT' COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. Case No. I: IS ~c.

Department, Board, Or Commission Author Bill Number

State of California - Department of Corporations

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the District of Columbia Policy Statement Effective date: 12/14/2000 Page 2

SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

40 Stevens Road Middlebury, CT (203) (203) {Mobile} HUMAN RESOURCES CONSULTING AGREEMENT

Case 2:13-cv CB Document 3 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CONSENT ORDER

AIA Document A310 TM 2010

PRACTICE GUIDELINES MEMORANDUM. RE: Sample Bankruptcy Motions and Orders for Personal Injury Practitioners and Trustees

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION ORDER

Notice of Class Action Lawsuit and Proposed Settlement. You May be Entitled to Receive a Settlement Payment.

STANDARD CONTINGENT FEE REPRESENTATION AGREEMENT FOR INDIVIDUALS

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

~INAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS AND JEFF SCHMIDT

Case 1:10-cv KMM Document 20 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/20/2011 Page 1 of 9

b) Content means full-length video programming that is available for purchase or rental through Vudu and is streamed using Internet protocol.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Case No: Defendants, Steven Lecy and the City of Minneapolis, through their

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE RECITALS

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DATA SALES ORDER FORM AND AGREEMENT

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE YOU MUST COMPLETE THIS CLAIM FORM AND SUBMIT IT BY NOVEMBER 23, 2013 TO BE ELIGIBLE TO SHARE IN THE SETTLEMENT.

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 17 1

APPLICATION TO THE SACRAMENTO COUNTY BAR/ INDIGENT DEFENSE PANEL (IDP)

Bond Form Commentary and Comparison

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM. Blitz v. AgFeed Industries, Inc. c/o Claims Administrator PO Box 3207 Portland, OR Tel:

FINAL JUDGMENT BY CONSENT

Case 2:14-cv JAM-KJN Document 10 Filed 06/05/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ABC Law 65-c prohibits a person under the age of 21 from possessing an alcoholic beverage with intent to consume it. This section provides:

HOUSE BILL No Washburne

RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF CHEVRON CORPORATION

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS. COMES NOW, AMERICAN ZURICH INSURANCE COMPANY on behalf of its

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT JUDGMENT

Case 3:15-cv B Document 4-1 Filed 02/25/15 Page 2 of 35 PageID 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

United States District Court, District of Minnesota. Rasschaert v. Frontier Communications Corp. Case No. 11-cv DWF/JSM

Case l:ll-cv yk Document 15 Filed 07/19/12 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : ORDER

How to Apply for a Pardon. State of California. Office of the Governor

SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT. to herein individually as a "Party" and collectively as the "Parties." RECITALS

If you worked as a Service Technician at Source Refrigeration & HVAC, you could get a payment from this class action settlement.

PARTICIPANT APPLICATION & RELEASE. * For verification purposes only pursuant to 18 U.S.C et seq.

Transcription:

Case 2: 15-cv-03174-JFW-FFM Document 16 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:248. I VANITA GUPTA 2 Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General JUDITH C. PRESTON (MD Bar 3 STEVEN" H. ROSENBAUM (NY Bar Reg. #1901958 4 CHRISTY E. LOPEZ (DC Bar #473612 5 R. TAMARHAGLER(CABar#189441 CHARLES HART (NY Bar Reg. # 421 6 NORRINDA BROWN HAY AT (DC Bar #479640 CARRIE PAGNUCCO (DC Bar #1000551 7 KATHRYN LADEWSKI (MI Bar #P74431 8 Civil Rights Division 9 U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 10 Washington, DC 20530 II Tel: (202 305-3192 Fax: (202 514-0212 12 Email: charles.hart@usdoj.gov 13 norrinda.hayat@usdoj.gov 14 Attorneys for Plaintiff United States of America 15 16 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 19 Plaintiff, 20 21 v. 22 THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 23 and THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY 24 SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT 25 26 27 Defendants. No.2:15-cv-03174 SUPPLEMENTAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Ca 2:15-cv-03174-JFW-FFM Document 16 Filed 07/20/15 Page 2 of 6 Page ID #:249 1 Pursuant to paragraph 196 of the Settlement Agreement, which was approved 2 and entered by the Court on May 1,2015, the United States, the County of Los 3 Angeles, and the Los Angeles Sheriffs Department ("LASD" (collectively, "the 4 parties" agree to distribute the LASD Settlement Fund to aggrieved persons as 5 follows: 6 1. Any interest accruing to the LASD Settlement Fund shall become a part 7 of the Settlement Fund and be used as set forth in this Supplemental Settlement 8 Agreement. 9 2. The United States and LASD will compensate aggrieved persons 10 according to the terms outlined in Attachment A. 11 3. Upon execution of this Supplemental Settlement Agreement, the United 12 States will endeavor to identify a list of potentially aggrieved persons. 13 4. The United States will provide the names of potentially aggrieved persons 14 to LASD on a rolling basis. 15 5. Within sixty (60 days of receiving names of potentially aggrieved 16 persons, LASD will review its files to determine whether it possesses information that 17 would disqualify any potentially aggrieved person from receiving an award from the 18 LASD Settlement Fund and to provide such information, including the relevant files, 19 to the United States. LASD also agrees to provide the United States with reasonable 20 access to its files. 21 6. The parties will endeavor in good faith to resolve any differences 22 regarding the qualification of a particular aggrieved person. 23 7. The United States will make a final decision on a pool of aggrieved 24 persons no later than three hundred (300 days from the Court's approval of the 25 Settlement Agreement in the related case, United States v. Housing Authority o/the 26 County of Los Angeles, Civil Action No. 15-05471 (C.D. Cal.. 27 8. At that time, the United States will provide LASD with sworn declarations from each of the potentially aggrieved persons outlining the harm that -2-

Ca 2:15-cv-03174-JFW-FFM Document 16 Filed 07/20115 Page 3 of 6 Page ID #:250 1 2 each experienced that is the basis for their damages award and a proposed damages award amount. 3 9. LASD will have sixty (60 days to review the declarations and object to 4 5 the categorization of particular aggrieved persons, but not the award amount. Nothing in this paragraph requires LASD to review declarations or make objections. 6 10. Should LASD object, the parties will have thirty (30 days to endeavor in 7 8 good faith to resolve any differences regarding the categorization of particular aggrieved persons. 9 11. After considering LASD's position, the United States will make the final 10 11 decision regarding the categorization of aggrieved persons and give notice of the distribution to the Court. 12 12. Within thirty (30 days after the filing of the notice of distribution, LASD 13 14 shall forward to the United States checks payable to the aggrieved persons in the amounts identified in the distribution notice.. 15 J 3. After the United States has received a signed release from a particular 16 aggrieved person in the form of Attachment B, it will distribute the settlement check to 17 that person in the amount stated in the distribution notice. 18 14. The LASD Settlement Fund will be used to compensate only those 19 aggrieved persons who had a compliance check that involved LASD and as described 20 in Attachment A. 2 J J 5. The amount allocated to a particular aggrieved person may be 22 supplemented by an award from the Settlement Fund in the related case, United States 23 v. Housing Authority a/the County a/los Angeles, Civil Action No. 15-05471 (C.D. 24 Cal.. 25 16. After the satisfaction of paragraphs 1-15, above, and the expiration of the 26 corresponding time periods, in the event that less than the total amount in the LASD 27 Settlement Fund, including accrued interest, is distributed to aggrieved persons, the remainder shall revert to LASD. -3-

Case 2:15-cv-03174-JFW-FFM Document 16 Filed 07/20115 Page 4 of 6 Page ID #: 251 1 Attachment A 2 CATEGORIES OF AGGRIEVED PERSONS AND COMPENSATION 3 AMOUNTS 4 I. MONETARY RELIEF 5 Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement LASD has contributed $700,000 to a settlement fund, which will be used to compensate African-American voucher holder households living in Lancaster.or 6 Palmdale subjected to a compliance check with LASD present between January 2004 and July 2011. LASD has also paid the United States a $25,000 civil penalty. 7 8 II. CATEGORIES 9 CATEGORY 1 CATEGORY 2 10 Voucher Holder Households Subject to a Section Voucher Holder Households Subject to a Section 8 Compliance Check" with LASD Present 8 Compliance Check" with LASD Present and 11 Unless: No Applicable Exclusions (as outlined in 12 1 criminal activity, including, but not Category 1 plus Aggravating Factors, including limited to, drugs and/or illegal gtms, was but not limited t6: 13 found at the location and is documented 1 excess LASD personnel 0 or more with a valid citation or arrest as long as entering the home; 14 the D.A. did not reject the case (unless in 2 cases rejected by the D.A. (excluding 15 lieu of a new charge the citation or arrest. charges treated as a violation of parole or resulted in a violation of probation or probation in lieu of a new charge; 16 parole; 3 more than one Section 8 compliance 2 a valid search warrant justified entry into check in any 1 year period; 17 the home; 4 independent investigations bylasd of 18 3 a valid arrest warrant ($10,000 bailor Section 8 compliance; 19 20 LASD in conjunction with a compliance address of the household, justified LASD check and not supported. by reasonable 21 presence at the home, except for traffic- suspicion unrelated to Section8; andlor, related offenses other than DUI; 6 consent to enter granted by minors or. 22 4 a valid probation, parole or sex offender search where only minors were present. 23 check of a resident of the household was being conducted; andlor,. 24 5 LASD was engaged in a call for service or a criminal investigation unrelated to 25 Section 8 comnliance 26 $1,000-10,000 $5,000-20,000 more for a resident of the household, or 5 back seat detention of a voucher holder, for a person who is identified on the or a member or guest of the household, by warrant as being associated with the 27 " Note: If LASD or housing authority personnel attempted a Section 8 compliance check, but no one answered the door and neither LASD nor housing authority personnel made contact with anyone at the home to discuss Section 8 issues, it is not a Section 8 compliance check. -4-

Case 2:15-cv-03174 JFW-FFM Document 16 Filed 07/20/15 Page 5 of 6 Page ID #:252 1 Attachment B 2 ' FULL AND FINAL RELEASE OF CLAIMS 3 4 In consideration for the parties' agreement to the terms of the Settlement ' 5 Agreement that was entered,by the Court in United States v. County of Los Angeles, 6 Civil Action No. 2:15-cv-03174, as approved by the United States District Court for 7 the Central District of California, and in consideration for the payment of 8 $, I,, do hereby fully release and forever 9 discharge the County of Los Angeles and the Los Angeles County Sheriffs 10 Department ("LASD" (hereinafter "Defendants", along with their insurers, attorneys, 11 principals, predecessors, successors, assigns, directors, officers, agents, employees, 12 former employees, heirs, executors, and administrators and any persons acting under 13 their direction or control from any and all fair housing claims, demands, judgments, or 14 liabilities (1 that arise out of or relate to the facts at issue in the litigation referenced 15 above, or in any way relate to that litigation; and (2 that were or could have been 16 alleged in the litigation described above (either by me or the United States. I 17 understand that I may later discover additional injuries or damages that are not 18 known to me at this time, but that arise from claims and facts that were or could 19 have been alleged in this litigation. This release specifically applies to such later ' 20 discovered injuries or damages and I specifically accept the risk that I may later 21 discover such injuries or damages. This Release does not release claims that arise 22 after the signing of this Release or apply to injuries or damages that are occasioned by 23 claims that arise after the signing of this Release. 24 Executed this day of. 25 26 27 Signature Print Name -5-

Case 2: 15-cv-03174-JFW-FFM Document 16. Filed 07/20/15 Page 6 of 6 Page ID #:253 1 Respectfully submitted this 20th day of July, 2015. 2 3 For the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: 4 5 LORETTA E. LYNCH Attorney General 6 EILEEN M. DECKER 7 United States Attorney 8 9 LEON W. WEIDMAN 10 11 12 13 Assistant United States Attorney 14 Assistant Division Chief 15 Civil Rights Unit Chief,' Civil Division Deputy Chiefs VANITA GUPTA Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney. General '. Civil Rights Division lsi JUDITH C. PRESTON Acting Chief STEVEN H. ROSENBAUM Chief CHRISTY E. LOPEZ R TAMAR HAGLER CHARLES HART 16 NORRINDA BROWN HA YAT 17 CARRIEPAGNUCCO KATHRYN LADEWSKI 18 Trial Attorneys 19 20 For the COUNTY OF LOS ANGELE and the LOS ANGELES SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT: 21 22 c'-~t~ ICKHAM 23 24 25 26 27 unty~unsel Los geles ~'Vl/' NBO Senior istant County Counsel County of Los Angeles -6-