Policy for the Receipt and Management of Petitions



Similar documents
City of Sydney Council. Petition Guidelines

NHS Greater Huddersfield Clinical Commissioning Group. Remuneration Committee. Terms of Reference

WHAT ARE THE GUIDELINES FOR SUBMITTING A PETITION?

Leigh C.E. Junior School. Policy Employees/Agents. Social Media

CCG Social Media Policy

NHS Lancashire North CCG. Competition Dispute Resolution Policy and Process

Listening to communities: Statutory guidance on the duty to respond to petitions

Customer Feedback Management Policy

Disciplinary and dismissal procedures for school staff

SOCIAL MEDIA POLICY. Senior Governance Officer, NHS North of England Commissioning Support Unit Reference No

Grievance Policy. 1. Policy Statement

Document no. EGC 1. Rules of Procedure (April 2016)

SUBJECT ACCESS REQUEST PROCEDURE

Complaints Policy. Complaints Policy. Page 1

Right to challenge parking policies

Information Governance Framework and Strategy. November 2014

CCG: IG06: Records Management Policy and Strategy

Job Description. Line Management of a small team of staff administrating and managing patient and professional feedback and incidents.

Berkshire West Clinical Commissioning Groups

A Guide to Pre-Application Advice and Fees and Planning Performance Agreements

Information Governance Framework

U & D COAL LIMITED A.C.N BOARD CHARTER

Code of Practice for Access to Council Meetings and Documents

Document Control Sheet

INFORMATION GOVERNANCE POLICY

Committees in the Fifth Assembly

COMPLIMENTS, CONCERNS AND COMPLAINTS POLICY. Compliments, Concerns and Complaints

Heads of Schools: Appointment Process and Job Description

Department of Justice and Equality. Request for Tenders (RFT) for an Evaluation of the REACH Project. Closing Date: 12 noon on 9 December 2014

CHILDREN AND ADULTS SERVICE RESEARCH APPROVAL GROUP

COMPLAINTS MANAGEMENT POLICY AND PROCEDURES

NHS Waltham Forest Clinical Commissioning Group Complaints Policy

Telford & Wrekin Council. Social Media Policy. Acceptable Use for Employees. Introduced: April 2013 Developed by: People Services

Patient and public engagement: a practical guide for health and wellbeing boards

Statement of responsibilities of auditors and audited bodies: Local authorities, NHS bodies and small authorities.

The National Assembly for Wales. Public Petitions Template

Ethical Investment Advisory Group

School Compliments & Complaints Policy. September 2015

Principles of Good Administration

Management. Level 3 Diploma in Management (QCF) 2014 Skills CFA Level 3 Diploma in Management (QCF) Page 1

COMPLIMENTS, CONCERNS AND COMPLAINTS POLICY. Compliments, Concerns and Complaints Policy

DISPUTE RESOLUTION GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE FOR TEACHING & SUPPORT STAFF IN SCHOOLS

Information Governance Policy

Parish Polls. Consultation on the Government s intentions to modernise parish poll regulations

SFHGEN98 Promote effective communication in a healthcare environment

CONSULTATION PAPER CP 41 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR CREDIT INSTITUTIONS AND INSURANCE UNDERTAKINGS

ENC Li Subject Access Request Procedure

ACADEMIC POLICY FRAMEWORK

Social Media Policy. Policies and Procedures. Social Media Policy

How To Be A Successful Health And Social Care Leader

Case manager. Person specification and competencies. Version 2 November

Fact sheet: Writing a complaint letter. General guidelines

APPRAISAL POLICY AND PROCEDURE FOR SUPPORT STAFF 1

SOCIAL MEDIA POLICY. Introduction

IBA Guide on Shareholders Agreements

The importance of nurse leadership in securing quality, safety and patient experience in CCGs

Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative. Validation guide

THE COMBINED CODE PRINCIPLES OF GOOD GOVERNANCE AND CODE OF BEST PRACTICE

INTERNET AND POLICY

COMPLAINTS POLICY & PROCEDURE

Freedom to speak up: whistleblowing policy for the NHS Draft for consultation

BLACKPOOL COUNCIL Topic Social Media Policy

M/601/2478. This unit is about taking minutes at different kinds of meetings, where an accurate record is needed of decisions made and actions agreed.

ICSA Response. DCLG Codes of conduct for local authority members and employees A consultation

A CREDITORS GUIDE TO LIQUIDATORS REMUNERATION SCOTLAND

2.4 Where a court liquidation follows immediately on an administration the court may appoint the former administrator to act as liquidator.

Disciplinary Process Supplementary Guidance. Role of the Nominated Officer

LICENSED IMMIGRATION ADVISERS Code of Conduct

Information Management Policy CCG Policy Reference: IG 2 v4.1

Grievance and Disputes Policy and Procedure. Document Title. Date Issued/Approved: 10 August Date Valid From: 21 December 2015

Electricity Settlements Company Ltd Framework Document

Stakeholders in a Business

How To Manage A Project

SFJ EFSM14 Manage the performance of teams and individuals to achieve objectives

The Shareholder Rights Directive becomes law.

Open Selection Funding Round Summary. Families and Communities Programme. Family Law Services Funding Round Summary

BYLAWS OF THE FACULTY College of Arts and Sciences Georgia State University

Audit of the implementation of recommendations made following investigation of complaints under Part 9 of the Health Act 2004.

Model Policy. Disability Leave. matters

and Entry to Premises by Local

1.2 The conduct of the Board is also governed by the Company's Constitution (Constitution).

ROYAL HOLLOWAY University of London. DISCIPLINARY POLICY AND PROCEDURE (for all staff other than academic teaching staff)

Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission: Regulatory Approach Statement

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ROLE OF THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS

Civil Aviation Authority. Regulatory Enforcement Policy

East Riding of Yorkshire Safeguarding Adults Board

Tax policy making: a new approach

Pre-application Advice for Major Developments: Guidance for Developers

Corporate Policy and Strategy Committee

St. Peter s C.E. Primary School Farnworth , Internet Security and Facsimile Policy

HILLCROSS BUSINESS COLLEGE (PTY) LTD

Complaints Handling Policy

MULTI AGENCY BEST INTERESTS MEETINGS GUIDANCE

HEADLANDS PRIMARY SCHOOL GRIEVANCE POLICY

UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM CODE OF PRACTICE ON EXTERNAL EXAMINING (TAUGHT PROVISION)

Councillor role descriptions

This job description does not form part of your contract of employment

London Borough of Brent Joint Regulatory Services ENFORCEMENT POLICY

BA (Hons) Broadcast Journalism and BA (Hons) Journalism 2016

Information Governance Policy

Transcription:

Policy for the Receipt and Management of Petitions

Title of document Type of document Description Target audience Author Directorate Approved by Policy for the Receipt and Management of Petitions Policy This document sets out how NHS Milton Keynes CCG will receive and manage Petitions from the local community. All staff Emma Richards (recognising NHS Wrekin & Telford) Corporate Affairs and Partnerships Organisational Development Group (on behalf of Governing Body) Date of approval 28 March 2013 Version Number 1.0 Emma Richards 1.1 Amended by Sue Lacey Bryant Next review date March 2015 Related documents Superseded documents Internal distribution External distribution Contact details (of main contact for this document) The Constitution: Appendix 3. Standing Orders, section 3.3 which relates to the CCG Board. None e-mail to CCG Board members and staff corporate files (M drive) Web site Name: Emma Richards Address: Sherwood Place, Sherwood Drive, Bletchley, Milton Keynes, MK3 6RT Tel: 01908 278680 Email: emma.richards@miltonkeynes.nhs.uk 1

CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction.. 3 2.0 Policy Context.. 3 3.0 Criteria for the consideration of Petitions... 3 4.0 Petitions received outside a formal consultation period 4 5.0 Petitions received during a formal consultation period.. 5 Version Date Change 1.0 Approved by Organisational Development Group (on behalf of Governing Body) 2

Receipt and Management of Petitions 1.0 Introduction 1.1 A petition represents the expression of the views of the people who sign it and petitions are an important mechanism for the expression of community views and the public voice. However, to avoid the danger of listening only to active, vocal groups, petitions should not be viewed in isolation but as one piece of evidence and information which contributes to an overall picture. 1.2 This guidance outlines how NHS Milton Keynes CCG will handle any petitions from the local community. This guidance is relevant to the receipt and management of either paper or e-petitions. 1.3 It sets out two circumstances in which petitions may be received: outside a formal consultation period or during a formal consultation period. 2.0 Policy Context 2.1 There is currently no clear, legally binding guidance to the NHS on handling petitions. Whilst the intention to introduce a clear framework was set out in Our health, Our Care, Our Say (Department of Health, 2006), this was not subsequently translated into policy. 2.2 When considering the receipt and management of e-petitions, the CCG wishes to ensure it follows best practice. The CCG has drawn on published terms and conditions for submitting e-petitions, utilised by HM Government. 3.0 Criteria for the consideration of petitions 3.1 In order to be received for consideration, petitions should meet the criteria outlined below: 1) Petitions may be received in paper or electronic format. 2) Petitions should include a statement of petition on each page, which should comprise: a) the organisation to which the petition is being addressed b) the proposition which is being promoted by the petition c) the timeframe over which the petition has been collected d) the following information about each petitioner should be included: Name Address Signature (in the case of a written petition) Email address (in the case of an electronic petition) 3) The name and address of the petition organiser, who must be resident within the area to which the petition relates, should be printed on the first page of the petition. 3.2 Petitions will not be considered if they are repeated, vexatious or if they 3

concern issues which are outside MK CCG s remit. Petitions will also not be considered if the information contained is confidential, libellous, false, defamatory or offensive. 1) A petition will be considered as a repeat petition if: a) it covers the same or substantially similar subject matter to another petition received within the previous six months; b) it is presented by the same or similar individuals or groups as another petition received within the previous six months. 2) A petition will be considered as a vexatious petition if: a) it focuses on individual grievances 3) A petition will be considered as outside MK CCG s remit if: a) it focuses on a matter relevant to another organisation b) it requests information available via Freedom of Information legislation c) its aim is to correspond on personal issue(s) with an individual(s) 4) A petition will be considered as confidential, libellous, false or defamatory if: a) it contains information which may be protected by an injunction or court order b) it contains material which is potentially confidential, commercially sensitive, or which may cause personal distress or loss 5) A petition will be considered as offensive if: a) it contains language that may cause offence, is provocative or extreme in its views 3.3 Where a petition does not meet the requirement set out in the criteria above then the relevant Director will respond in writing within ten working days to confirm that the petition has been received and that, as the petition does not meet the criteria, no response will be provided. 4.0 Petitions received outside formal consultation period 4.1 For petitions received outside a formal consultation period, the Chair will delegate responsibility for receiving a petition to their nominated representative. 4.2 The Chair s nominated Board Member will arrange for a short private meeting with the Petition Organiser to formally receive the Petition. All photographic opportunities may be politely declined by the CCG during this meeting. 4.3 Once received, the Chair s nominated representative will ensure that the petition receives appropriate and proportionate consideration at the next available Board Meeting and that a response is made in writing. 5.0 Petitions received during a formal consultation period 4

5.1 Where a petition concerns an issue out for formal consultation it will be considered as an item of correspondence, in the same way that any other response would be considered. Petitions will be considered as valid for consideration as part of the consultation if they meet the requirements set out in the criteria outlined in section 3.0 of this policy. 5.2 All petitions received will be shared with the relevant Healthwatch group and Health Overview and Scrutiny Committee(s) as part of the report on views received during consultation and the overall results of the consultation. 5.3 When a report on the outcome of consultation is prepared, the following issues will be taken into account when considering a petition: Consultation is not a public vote. Influence will be afforded to the most cogent ideas and arguments, and not necessarily to the views of the most numerous stakeholders. The petition should be relevant to the subject of the consultation. It may not necessarily use the same words, but it should have a bearing on the proposal(s) that the CCG has put forward. The petition should reflect the latest proposals and policy statements being made by the CCG and not relate to issues that are no longer under consideration. This is particularly relevant when considering the timescale during which signatures have been collected. The petition should provide an accurate reflection of the proposals in the consultation, rather than including misleading information or statements. The petition should relate to the consultation and to the proposed action of the CCG (and/or its stakeholders), rather than to broader policy agenda beyond the scope of the consultation. The petition s concerns will be assessed in relation to the aims being put forward in the consultation, and the rationale and constraints behind it. For example, a petition that proposes a realistic alternative option will normally be given greater weight than a petition that simply opposes an option that has been put forward for valid reasons. The petition s concerns will also be assessed in relation to the impact on other populations if these demands were accepted. This assessment could take into account views expressed in other petitions (which may conflict) or in more direct responses to the consultation. 5.4 The organiser of the petition will receive correspondence from the CCG as the body that has initiated the consultation, in the same manner as other respondents (e.g. acknowledgement, an outcome letter describing how the issues raised during consultation have influenced the decisions made following consultation). 5.5 Petitions will be formally acknowledged in the analysis of consultation responses, along with all the other responses. If what Petitioners call for is accepted or rejected, the reasons for this should be given, set out against a transparent set of criteria. 5