Mean EPDs reported by different breeds



Similar documents
Beef Cattle Breeds and Biological Types Scott P. Greiner, Extension Animal Scientist, Virginia Tech

The subject of breeds intrigues most beef cattle. Type and Breed Characteristics and Uses. Texas Adapted Genetic Strategies for Beef Cattle V:

Australian Santa Gertrudis Selection Indexes

Beef Cattle Feed Efficiency. Dan Shike University of Illinois

BREEDS OF BEEF CATTLE

Beef Cattle. Production MP184 DIVISION OF AGRICULTURE R E S E A R C H & E X T E N S I O N

REPRODUCTION AND BREEDING Crossbreeding Systems for Beef Cattle

Premium Interface Component

Matthew McClure October 18, 2013

IOWA STATE FAIR * AUGUST 11-21, 2016 * FFA BEEF CATTLE

COW/CALF MANAGEMENT Minimizing Calving Difficulty in Beef Cattle

Veterinary Science Preparatory Training for the Veterinary Assistant. Floron C. Faries, Jr., DVM, MS

Cattleman s Top Cut Sale Mid-Tex Livestock Auction, Navasota, Texas November 12, 2011 * 12:00 Noon

An Electronic Field Trip to a Beef Cattle Farm Kentucky Cooperative Extension Service University of Kentucky College of Agriculture

** ANIMAL ID NUMBERS MUST BE DESIGNATED IN **

Improvement of the economic position of the farm or ranch

Beef Cattle Frame Scores

Inheritance of Color And The Polled Trait Dr. R. R. Schalles, Dept. of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University

ANIMAL SCIENCE RESEARCH CENTRE

Terms: The following terms are presented in this lesson (shown in bold italics and on PowerPoint Slides 2 and 3):

Beef Cattle Handbook

Texas Show Steer Breed Classification

MCDONALD S SUSTAINABLE BEEF PILOT Information Sharing Initiative Report April 7, 2016

2016 Beef Information Sheet

Net feed intake: Potential selection tool to improve feed efficiency in beef cattle

BREEDING SOUNDNESS EVALUATION OF BULLS

Replacement Heifers Costs and Return Calculation Decision Aids

Replacement Heifers Costs and Return on Investment Calculation Decision Aids

A comparison of beef breed bulls for beef production & carcass traits. Future cattle production -seminar Viikki Campus

FEEDLOT MANAGEMENT Matching Cattle Type and Feedlot Performance

Livestock Judging Manual Table of Contents

Live, In-the-Beef, or Formula: Is there a Best Method for Selling Fed Cattle?

Animal Birth Registration

Carcass Traits and Merit

Livestock Test Bank 2

AN ACCELERATED FEEDING STUDY

Breeding for Carcass Traits in Dairy Cattle

Cattlemen s Corner Beef Newsletter

Beef Quiz Bowl Questions

ANALYSE OF PURE BRED BELGIAN BLUE BEEF CATTLE POPULATIONS

SHOW STEER SELECTION. Darrell Rothlisberger Rich County Agent Utah State University Extension

Cattle Growth Dynamics and Its Implications

How To Run A Blade Farming Scheme

Economics of Estrus Synchronization and Artificial Insemination. Dr. Les Anderson and Paul Deaton University of Kentucky

Isabelle LEGRAND S. CHRIKI, L. JOURNAUX, J.F. HOCQUETTE, B. PICARD, D. PETHICK, R. POLKINGHORNE. 18 th October

Relationship between weight at puberty and mature weight in beef cattle

Producing Right Sized Cows Cow Size and Efficiency: Solving the Puzzle

CASE STUDIES OF STRATEGIC ALLIANCES IN SOUTHEASTERN BEEF PRODUCTION. Jeffrey Gillespie, Angel Bu, and Robert Boucher. Abstract

Investing in genetic technologies to meet future market requirements and assist in delivering profitable sheep and cattle farming

A HISTORIC EVALUATION OF RESEARCH INDICATORS IN BCRC PRIORITY AREAS

Declining Quality Grades: A Review of Factors Reducing Marbling Deposition in Beef Cattle.

EBLEX BEEF BRP MANUAL 4. Beef production from the dairy herd

enews Taste Excellence AWA NEWSLETTER

Managing cattle for the kind of beef you want your kids to eat.

The Costs of Raising Replacement Heifers and the Value of a Purchased Versus Raised Replacement

Beef - Key performance indicators. Mary Vickers

Trailblazer. The. Can Top Bulls Really Return More Dollars? Vest Ranch cows July Volume 6, Issue 1.

Genetics of Colour Variation

Conservation of the Tswana cattle breed in Botswana. Summary. Résumé. Introduction. Ntombizakhe Mpofu

NAV routine genetic evaluation of Dairy Cattle

GROSS MARGINS : HILL SHEEP 2004/2005

Increasing Profitability Through an Accelerated Heifer Replacement Program

SELECTING AND BREEDING THE UNIQUE BRAHMAN

Artificial insemination:

Swine EPD Terminology

STATE FFA DAIRY EVALUATION CAREER DEVELOPMENT EVENT KNOWLEDGE TEST

Original N-Bar Genetics Working For You. to the L e g a c y 2012 SIRE DIRECTORY SI N C L A I R CA T T L E COMPA N Y, INC.

Introduction. Introduction Nutritional Requirements. Six Major Classes of Nutrients. Water 12/1/2011. Regional Hay School -- Bolivar, MO 1

How To Read An Official Holstein Pedigree

Creep Feeding Beef Calves

Recipe For Marbling. Page 1 of 12. Quality grade continues to generate largest grid premiums

Southeast Texas Independent Cattlemen s Association

REPRODUCTION AND BREEDING Influence of Nutrition on Reproduction in the Beef Cow Herd

Characterization of the Beef Cow-calf Enterprise of the Northern Great Plains

1. About dairy cows. Breed of dairy cows

NATIONAL DAIRY HERD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM UNIFORM OPERATING PROCEDURES

THE EVALUATION OF DISTILLERS CO-PRODUCTS IN DAIRY BEEF PRODUCTION

Practical Sheep Breeding

Genetic improvement: a major component of increased dairy farm profitability

Braunvieh Semen Directory

Breeding Beef Name Town Category Ribbon Erica Chapman Tipton Angus Purple Kamryn Chapman Tipton Commercial Heifers Purple Madison Conrad Bennett

In many areas of the country, the Holstein

Livestock Style Guide

Proceedings, Applied Reproductive Strategies in Beef Cattle September 11 and 12, 2007, Billings, Montana NEW TECHNOLOGIES FOR REPRODUCTION IN CATTLE

Scope for the Use of Pregnancy Confirmation Data in Genetic Evaluation for Reproductive Performance

Youth Livestock Division

Transcription:

Mean EPDs reported by different breeds Larry A. Kuehn and R. Mark Thallman Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, USDA-ARS, Clay Center, NE 68933 Expected progeny differences (EPDs) have been the primary tool for genetic improvement of beef cattle for over 40 years beginning with evaluations of growth traits. Since that time EPDs have been added for several other production traits such as calving ease, stayability, and carcass merit and conformation. Most recently, several breed associations have derived economic indices from their EPDs to increase profit under different management and breeding systems. It is useful for producers to compare the EPDs of potential breeding animals with their breed average. The current EPDs from the most recent genetic evaluations of 25 breeds are presented in this report. Mean EPDs for growth traits are shown in Table 1 (25 breeds), for other production traits in Table 2 (15 breeds), and for carcass and composition traits in Table 3 (20 breeds). Several breeds also have EPDs that are unique to their breed; these EPDs are presented in Table 4. Average EPDs should only be used to determine the genetic merit of an animal relative to its breed average. To compare animals of different breeds, across breed adjustment factors should be added to -breed EPD Tables reported by Kuehn et al. in these proceedings). This list is likely incomplete; evaluations for some breeds are not widely reported. If you see a breed missing and would like to report the average EPDs for that breed, please contact Larry (Larry.Kuehn@ars.usda.gov) or Mark (Mark.Thallman@ars.usda.gov). 112

Table 1. Birth year 2009 average EPDs from 2011 evaluations for growth traits Birth Weight Weaning Weight Yearling Weight Maternal Milk Total Maternal Angus 2.0 46 83 22 Black Hereford 3.1 42 65.1 13.8 34.8 Hereford 3.6 43 71 17 38 Murray Grey 3.4 20 31 4 14 Red Angus 0.0 30.9 58.2 16.7 Red Poll 1.7 15 24 7 Shorthorn 2.4 15.3 24.8 2.3 10 South Devon 2.8 41.4 77.3 22.8 43.5 Beefmaster 0.4 9 14 2 Braford 1.0 9 13 2 7 Brahman 1.9 14.8 23.8 6.3 Brangus -.77 22.6 44.8 10.7 22.1 Red Brangus 1.5 12.7 20.1 5.7 12.1 Santa Gertrudis 0.5 4.0 5.0 0.0 2.0 Senepol 0.9 7.7 10.4 4.2 8.0 Simbrah 2.6 28.3 46.3 2.3 16.5 Braunvieh -0.11 6.2 12.2 0.4 3.5 Charolais 0.6 24.2 42.3 6.4 18.5 Chianina 2.1 32.0 59.5 12.1 28.1 Gelbvieh 1.3 41 75 18 38 Limousin 1.8 42.9 80.2 20.9 Maine-Anjou 1.9 39.7 78.1 19.5 39.3 Salers 1.8 40.2 77.4 19.5 39.6 Simmental 0.9 32.1 57.9 3.6 19.7 Tarentaise 1.9 16 28.6 0.6 113

Table 2. Birth year 2009 average EPDs from 2011 evaluations for other production traits Calving Ease Direct Calving Ease Maternal Scrotal Circumference (cm) Docility Score Mature Weight Stayability Angus 5 7 0.42 9.5 31 Hereford 0.3 0.7 0.7 Murray Grey -0.7-0.2 0.10 47 Red Angus 5.4 3.3 9.0 Shorthorn -1.7-1.7 South Devon 0.1 0.0 Beefmaster 0.2 Brangus 0.69 Braunvieh -0.05-1.25 Charolais 2.8 3.5 0.59 Gelbvieh 105 104 0.4 4 Limousin 7.7 4.1 0.4 16.6 18.4 Salers 0.2 0.3 0.3 8.0 22.7 Simmental 7.0 3.0 17.8 Tarentaise -1.2 0.6 114

Table 3. Birth year 2009 average EPDs from 2011 evaluations for carcass and composition traits Carcass Fat Carcass Wt Retail Product Yield Grade Marbling Score Ribeye Area (in 2 ) Thickness Rump fat WBSF Angus 15.0 0.43 0.21 0.012 Hereford 0.04 0.22 0.002 Murray Grey 27 0.3 0.0 0.09 0.00-0.01 Red Angus 35.5-0.003 0.07 0.07-0.034 Shorthorn 4.9-0.02 0.07-0.01 South Devon 25.0 0.8 0.3 0.21 0.01 Beefmaster 0.00 a 0.03 a 0.000 a 0.00 a Braford 6 0.01 0.06 0.002 Brahman 5.2 0.01-0.01 0.04-0.002 0.0 Brangus 0.7 0.04 b 0.37 b 0.00 b Santa Gertrudis 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Simbrah -6.3 0.06-0.01-0.2 0.01-0.03 Braunvieh 0.1 0.12 0.01 0.115 Charolais 14.1 0.01 0.18-0.001 Chianina -1.2-0.20 0.09 0.02 0.01 Gelbvieh 8.3 c -0.03 c 0.10 c Limousin 19.4-0.08-0.04 0.49 Maine-Anjou -0.1 0.29 0.20 0.15 0.00 Salers 20.0 0.0 0.1 0.03 0.00 Simmental -1.7-0.001 0.15 0.10 0.15-0.30 a Derived using ultrasound measures and reported on an ultrasound scale (IMF% instead of marbling score) b Reported on an ultrasound scale (IMF% instead of marbling score) but calculated using ultrasound and carcass data in a multi-trait model c Adjusted to a fat-constant endpoint 115

Table 4. Birth year 2009 average EPDs from 2011 evaluations for other traits unique to individual breeds Angus Residual Average Daily Gain Mature Height Yearling Height Cow Energy Value Weaned Calf Value Feedlot Value Grid Value Beef Value.13 0.4 0.35 1.41 25.50 24.61 24.53 46.23 Hereford Red Angus Gelbvieh Limousin Simmental Murray Grey Baldy Maternal Brahman Influence Certified Hereford Beef Calving Ease Index Index Index Index 15 14 18 14 Heifer Pregnancy Mature Cow Maintenance (Mcal/mo) 7.5 4.1 Feedlot Merit Carcass Value Gestation Days to Length (d) Finish (d) 8.82 6.74-1.4 3.5 Mainstream Terminal Index 42.5 All Purpose Terminal Index All Purpose Terminal Index Index Simbrah Index 104.6 62.5 75 47 Gestational Days to calving 600-d wt length (d) (d) 45-0.1-0.6 116