North Carolina Property Tax Assessment and Appeals Procedure



Similar documents
RULES OF THE TAX APPEAL COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

Part VIII RULES GOVERNING PRACTICE IN THE TAX COURT OF NEW JERSEY TABLE OF CONTENTS

SMALL CLAIMS RULES. (d) Record of Proceedings. A record shall be made of all small claims court proceedings.

NC General Statutes - Chapter 108A Article 4 1

Department of State Treasurer. Policy Manual for Local Governments. Section 50: Property Tax Assessment, Billing and Collection

MAINE REVENUE SERVICES PROPERTY TAX DIVISION PROPERTY TAX BULLETIN NO. 10

TEXAS SALES & PROPERTY TAX

CHAPTER 7 UNIFORM COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE RULES

2013 Property Tax Calendar

BLAIR COUNTY ASSESSMENT APPEALS RULES AND REGULATIONS

SB 588. Employment: nonpayment of wages: Labor Commissioner: judgment enforcement.

THE PROPERTY TAX PROTEST PROCESS

2016 Property Tax Calendar

A GUIDE TO TAX APPEAL HEARINGS. Information provided by the State of New Jersey Department of Treasure Division of Taxation

The N.C. State Bar v. Wood NO. COA (Filed 1 February 2011) 1. Attorneys disciplinary action convicted of criminal offense

TAX COURT OF NEW JERSEY. Part VIII Rules Handbook RULES GOVERNING PRACTICE IN THE TAX COURT OF NEW JERSEY

South Carolina s Statutory Whistleblower Protections. A Review for SC Qui Tam Attorneys, SC Whistleblower Lawyers & SC Fraud Law Firms

Introduction to Georgia Property Tax for Non-Profits. Madison Barnett Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP July 30, 2014

Property FAQs. Where do I pay my property tax? Generally speaking, property taxes are paid to local Tax Collectors where the property is located.

North Carolina Power of Sale Foreclosure Procedure

The Property Tax in Missouri

Real Property Tax Ordinance

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING COMPLAINT BY PRISONERS UNDER THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT, 42 U.S.C.

Glossary of Assessment Terms:

GENERAL OVERVIEW OF GEORGIA S PROPERTY TAX SYSTEM

Chapter 213. Enforcement of Texas Unemployment Compensation Act... 2 Subchapter A. General Enforcement Provisions... 2 Sec

NO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 19 March Motor Vehicles Lemon Law disclosure requirement

Senate AN ACT CREATING THE OFFICE OF GOVERNMENTAL ACCOUNTABILITY.

Property Tax in North Carolina

Case 5:06-cv XR Document 20 Filed 09/28/06 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

NEW JERSEY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE Copyright 2013 by the New Jersey Office of Administrative Law

HB Introduced by Representative Patterson AN ACT

In the Court of Appeals of Georgia

MOHAVE COUNTY JUSTICE COURT. If you want to file a SMALL CLAIMS ANSWER

FALSE CLAIMS ACT STATUTORY LANGUAGE

Please see Section IX. for Additional Information:

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2015 H 1 HOUSE BILL 741. Short Title: Shift Workers' Bill of Rights. (Public)

Oklahoma Ad Valorem. 1 of 14. Central Valuation by Oklahoma Tax Commission: All Public Service Corporations (multiple county impact)

MIKE COX, ATTORNEY GENERAL

PENNSYLVANIA BUILDERS ASSOCIATION INSTRUCTIONS TO HOME IMPROVEMENT MODEL CONTRACT STANDARD FORM Introduction

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATIVE LAW COURT

North Carolina s Reference to the Internal Revenue Code Updated - Impact on 2015 North Carolina Corporate and Individual income Tax Returns

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1 Article 51 1

North Carolina s Reference to the Internal Revenue Code Updated - Impact on 2015 North Carolina Corporate and Individual income Tax Returns

AN ACT. To amend chapter 383, RSMo, by adding thereto thirteen new sections relating to the Missouri health care arbitration act.

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS

COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE SERVICES : FEBRUARY 20, 2004 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE SERVICES : FEBRUARY 20, 2004 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

CHAPTER 234 HOUSE BILL 2131 AN ACT AMENDING SECTIONS , AND , ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES; RELATING TO TAX ADJUDICATIONS.

LOUISIANA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION PLAN OF LEGAL SPECIALIZATION

As a new owner of Arizona real estate property,

Introduction (916) (800)

Representing Yourself In Employment Arbitration: An Employee s Guide

North Carolina s Reference to the Internal Revenue Code Updated - Impact on 2015 North Carolina Corporate and Individual income Tax Returns

Watson v. Price NO. COA (Filed 19 April 2011) Medical Malpractice Rule 9(j) order extending statute of limitations not effective not filed

(Draft No. 1.1 H.735) Page 1 of 16 4/29/ BNH - 05:24 PM. The Committee on Finance to which was referred House Bill No.

THE SILENT KILLER: What New Jersey attorneys need to know about Chapter 91. By David B. Wolfe 1

ARTICLE 4.2. ASSESSMENT OF TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY NOTE: Reinstated by IC , effective July 1, 2003.

EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS SETTLEMENT

AN ACT RELATING TO LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT; AMENDING THE MINIMUM WAGE ACT TO CREATE A PREFERENCE FOR CIVIL ACTIONS AND APPEALS

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS JUVENILE COURT DEPARTMENT JUVENILE COURT RULES

CALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION

Column B Taxable Value (35% of Column A)

991. Creation of division of administrative law Applicability; exemptions; attorney fees; court costs

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

This is the third appearance of this statutory matter before this Court. This

NEW YORK CITY FALSE CLAIMS ACT Administrative Code through *

TAX DEPARTMENT. Overview

GEORGIA LEMON LAW SUMMARY

PART ONE PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE (60 minutes)

Manufactured Housing Retailer s Special Inventory

RENDERED: May 7, 1999; 10:00 a.m. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED NO CA MR COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY OPINION AFFIRMING ** ** ** ** **

Assessor Ken Yazel. Ad Valorem Property Taxes In Tulsa County, OK. Prepared by the Tulsa County Assessor s Office

SAN FRANCISCO AMENDS BUSINESS TAX ORDINANCE BOARD OF REVIEW ELIMINATED, STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR REFUNDS INCREASED AND MUCH MORE. Tax March 26, 2004

RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT

NO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 2 November Appeal by Respondents from orders entered 14 September 2009 by

ESTATE OF JOHN JENNINGS. WILLIAM CUMMING et al. entered in the Superior Court (Waldo County, R. Murray, J.) finding George liable

(2) For production of public records or hospital medical records. Where the subpoena commands any custodian of public records or any custodian of hosp

The Judges of the Fulton Superior Court hereby create a "Business Case Division" (hereinafter referred to as the "Division").

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Plaintiff, v. ROY ELLIS BAGGETT, Defendant STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Plaintiff, v. ED PENUEL, Defendant

WORKERS COMPENSATION ORKERS OMPENSATION: INJURY

A Citizens Guide to the Revaluation and Assessment of Property by North Carolina Counties

NC General Statutes - Chapter 55 Article 14 1

SENATE BILL 698. By Stevens. WHEREAS, pursuant to language proposed to be added to Article VI, Section 3 of the

STATE OF OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION OF FINANCE AND CORPORATE SECURITIES

COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY BOARD OF TAX APPEALS FILE NOS. K13-R-31, K13-R-32 FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION CABINET DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE

Compulsory Arbitration

Definition of the Practice of Law*

WHEREAS, the Renewal contained a proposed material revision ( Revision ) to the previous charter petition; and

This grievance resolution procedure establishes guidelines for the prompt and equitable

INTERNET EAST, INC., STEVEN I. COHEN, and ANTONIO MARIE, III, Plaintiff-appellees v. DURO COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Defendantappellant. No.

UTILITY COMPLAINT HANDLING PROCEDURES OF THE NEW YORK STATE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

T.C. Memo UNITED STATES TAX COURT. RICHARD E. SNYDER AND MARION B. SNYDER, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Sub. H.B. 9 * 126th General Assembly (As Reported by H. Civil and Commercial Law)

HUB PROPERTIES TRUST, a Maryland Real estate investment trust, Plaintiff/Appellant,

Appeal Bonds, Sureties, and Stays

South Carolina Property Tax 2015 Edition

State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2015 HOUSE BILL 1080 RATIFIED BILL AN ACT TO ESTABLISH THE ACHIEVEMENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.

Transcription:

North Carolina Property Tax Assessment and Appeals Procedure by Charles B. Neely, Jr. and Nancy S. Rendleman All privately owned real and personal property (including intangible property) is subject to ad valorem taxation in North Carolina unless it is constitutionally exempted, or classified and excluded from taxation by statute. 1 Since the property tax annually generates city and county tax revenues in excess of $4 billion, it is an important part of the tax structure in North Carolina. Property statutorily classified and excluded from property taxation under authority of Article V, Sec. 2(2) of the North Carolina Constitution is as diverse as the interest groups which have influenced the General Assembly to adopt their views of good public policy. The major classifications of excluded property include property used for environmental protection purposes, household furnishings, property belonging to a wide variety of non-profit organizations, intangible personal property other than leasehold interests in exempted real property, inventories of manufacturers, retailers and wholesalers, and some forms of computer software. 2 Other property, most notably residential properties occupied by poor, elderly or disabled individuals and qualified agricultural, horticultural and forestland properties, are classified and assessed at reduced valuations. 3 Most real and personal property is assessed locally by county assessors. The property of public service companies (railroads, electric power companies, telephone companies, etc.) is centrally assessed by the Department of Revenue each year. The assessment of both classes is governed by the Machinery Act. 4 A. Listing and Assessment of Locally Assessed Real and Personal Property and Appeals to County Boards of Equalization and Review. All property subject to assessment must be assessed at its true value in money, or fair market value. 5 Further, under the North Carolina Constitution, all property in each county must be assessed uniformly. 6 As an example, it would constitute a violation of uniformity principles for the assessor to distinguish in assessment practice between property that has been sold and similar property that has not been sold. See Edward Valves, Inc. v. Wake County. 7 The value of business personal property is determined annually as of January 1 based upon annual business personal property tax listings that must be filed by taxpayers in the county where the property is sited as of the first day of the year. 8 Typically, counties determine the value of such property using tables promulgated by the Department of Revenue which are designed to calculate fair market value RALEIGH\304028_ 1-1 -

by trending the installed historic cost of property by vintage year of acquisition to current replacement cost and then depreciating the current replacement cost through the use of depreciation tables based upon the estimated lives of classes of assets. While acceptable for mass appraisal purposes, the tables are generally not designed to account for external and functional obsolescence and unusual physical depreciation. In some counties, notice of assessed value of business personal property will be mailed in the spring; in most counties, the taxpayer notice will be in the form of the annual tax bill, generally mailed in August. The other major category of assessable personal property consists of motor vehicles, boats, airplanes and mobile homes, all of which are assessable on an annual basis. Real property is valued on a county-wide basis by the county tax assessor every eight years, unless the local taxing jurisdiction advances its revaluation schedule. 9 Many North Carolina counties are now revaluing all real property every four (4) years. An individual taxpayer s real property may be revalued between scheduled revaluation years if the value changes as a result of certain events, such as additions or expansions to a structure. 10 In appraising real property, the county tax assessor must follow a prescribed schedule of values that is approved by the county board of commissioners in preparation for the county-wide revaluation and is used to ensure the uniform assessment of real property. 11 If a taxpayer concludes that his real property has been over assessed, it is advisable to appeal the assessed value during the revaluation year. Any relief granted will be effective for the year appealed and future years in the revaluation cycle. Appeals may, however, be taken after the revaluation year. See In Re Property of Pine Raleigh Corp. 12 In such cases, the valuation of the property will be determined as of January 1 of the prior revaluation year, subject to the limited exceptions set forth in N.C.G.S. 105-287 governing changes to the property thereafter. The relief granted will not be retroactive. Even though a property s valuation has changed significantly since the general revaluation date, if the valuation change is not confined to something peculiar to the property, but is due to economic changes affecting the county in general, the property s assessed value may not be changed until the next revaluation. 13 In the event that a taxpayer objects to the county tax assessor s listing, appraisal or assessment of the taxpayer s real or personal property, the taxpayer may appeal to the county board of equalization and review. 14 The board of equalization and review is comprised of the board of county commissioners unless the board of county commissioners has authorized a special board of equalization and review to hear property tax appeals. 15 County boards of equalization and review convene between the first Monday in April and the first Monday in May of each year to hear property tax appeals and must adjourn no later than July 1, (December 1 in revaluation years ), or later under certain circumstances when the board has received a timely-filed appeal prior to its adjournment for the year. 16 In non-revaluation years it is not uncommon for boards to meet and adjourn on the same date. Since appeals to the county board must be filed prior to its adjournment, 17 in non-revaluation years a taxpayer would be well advised to file its - 2 -

appeal before the board convenes. In revaluation years, some counties publish notice that the board will adjourn on June 30 or some other date, except for the purpose of hearing pending appeals. The purpose of this notice is to cut off the time for filing appeals as of the noticed date of adjournment, even though the board will continue to meet after that date to hear appeals previously filed. While the statutory scheme is ambiguous on this point, 18 a taxpayer should acquaint itself with the local rules to ensure that its appeal is timely filed. If a notice of the assessment of real or personal property is not delivered until after adjournment of the county board, it is generally accepted that an appeal is timely if filed before year end on the grounds that failure to afford a hearing would constitute a denial of due process. Upon appeal by a taxpayer who owns property in the county, the county board of equalization and review will review any decision of the county tax assessor with regard to the listing or appraisal of the taxpayer s property. 19 The county board is authorized to examine and adjust the appraised value of the taxpayer s property and take other steps necessary to ensure that the property is appraised and taxed in conformity with statutory requirements. 20 If a taxpayer is aggrieved by the assessment of property he does not own, he may also appeal that assessed value. 21 Hearings before county boards are informal. Taxpayers may represent themselves, be represented by counsel and, in most counties, by family members, accountants or tax representatives. Witnesses are not sworn and the rules of evidence are not followed. B. Discovery Assessments and Appeal Procedure. If the county tax assessor determines that a taxpayer has not properly listed all real or personal property required to be listed, the assessor may make a discovery assessment of the unreported or underreported property and charge penalties at the rate of 10% per year for the failure to report the property. 22 The assessor may make a discovery for the current year and the prior five (5) years. 23 Once the county tax assessor makes a discovery assessment, the assessor s listing and appraisal of the discovered property will become final unless the taxpayer files with the assessor a written exception to the discovery within thirty (30) days after receiving notice of the discovery. 24 Upon receipt of a timely written exception, the assessor will arrange a conference with the taxpayer to allow the taxpayer an opportunity to present evidence and arguments regarding the discovery. 25 Within fifteen (15) days of the conference, the assessor must give written notice of his final decision to the taxpayer. 26 The taxpayer then has fifteen (15) days from the date of the notice to appeal to the county board of equalization and review or, if the board of equalization and review is not in session, to the county board of commissioners. 27 In recent years, many counties have used the services of contract auditors who frequently work on a contingent fee basis. This procedure, while objectionable to taxpayers confronted by an auditor who will be paid based upon his success in defending his assessment recommendations to the assessor, has been approved by the North Carolina Supreme Court. 28-3 -

C. Listing and Assessment of Centrally Assessed Property The property of centrally assessed public service companies (PSC) is annually assessed by the Department of Revenue. 29 The values of system property (the realty and personalty used in public service activities, whether in or out of North Carolina) are in most instances determined based upon the unit value of the entire PSC and are then apportioned to North Carolina based upon the ratio that the taxpayer s property, business or mileage in North Carolina bears to its total property, business, or mileage. 30 The North Carolina apportioned value is then allocated by the Department among local taxing units based upon statutory formulas set forth for each PSC. 31 The value of non-system PSC property (realty and personalty not used in public service activities) is appraised by the Department and certified to the taxing units in which the properties are situated. 32 The valuations of system and non-system real and personal property certified by the Department to local taxing units are then assessed locally at the same rates of tax levied against other property in the local taxing jurisdictions. To prevent discrimination in taxation against centrally assessed taxpayers in favor of local taxpayers, and to cure the discrimination inherent in a system in which locally assessed real property is revalued octennially and PSC property is assessed annually, the General Assembly enacted remedial relief. 33 In simplified terms, the appraised value of PSC system property is adjusted by applying to the amount allocated to each county a percentage which reflects the level of assessment of other property in the county compared to its fair market value based on real estate sales assessment ratio studies conducted in the revaluation year and the fourth and seventh years thereafter, if the sales assessment ratio studies show a level of real estate assessment in the county below 90%. 34 This procedure is designed to correct for the effects of inflation and demand on the purchase price of real property over the reassessment cycle, which generally results in real property being assessed at less than fair market value in later years of the cycle. Valuation, apportionment and equalization decisions of the Department of Revenue relative to PSC property are subject to appeal by the taxpayer to the Property Tax Commission. 35 D. Review by Property Tax Commission. If a taxpayer objects to the resolution of his locally assessed property tax appeal by the county board of equalization and review or board of county commissioners, or if a public service company objects to a valuation or apportionment decision by the Department of Revenue, the taxpayer may appeal to the state Property Tax Commission. 36 Three of the five members of the Commission are appointed by the Governor, one member is appointed by the Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives and one member is appointed by the President Pro Tempore of the North Carolina Senate. 37 For locally assessed property, written notice of appeal to the Commission must be filed within - 4 -

thirty (30) days after the date that the county board of equalization and review mails a notice of its decision to the property owner. 38 An appeal by a PSC to the Commission must be filed within 20 days after the date the Department of Revenue mails notice of its tentative appraisal and apportionment. 39 Challenges to equalization decisions must be given within 30 days after the mailing of the Department s notice. 40 The Commission promulgates rules governing its procedures, which may be found at 17 N.C.A.C. 11. Under the Commission procedures, the taxpayer must timely request a hearing. According to Commission rules, only taxpayers appearing pro se or attorneys licensed to practice law in North Carolina may file appeals to the Commission or otherwise appear before that body. 41 After an appeal is filed, the staff of the Property Tax Division of the Department of Revenue will consult with both the taxpayer and the county in an attempt to informally mediate the appeal. The staff is knowledgeable and helpful and their efforts are frequently successful. Although the Rules of Civil Procedure do not apply to proceedings before the Commission, the rules pertaining to discovery have been adopted and are available for use by the parties. 42 In addition, the Commission has the authority to issue subpoenas. 43 The full Commission may hear the taxpayer s appeal or, in rare instances, it may designate one or more Commission members or Department employees to hear the appeal and issue a proposed decision which may then be accepted or rejected by the full Commission after review of the record and any written arguments of the parties. 44 Typically the Commission meets monthly, usually, but not always, in Raleigh. Hearings before the Commission are de novo and are conducted under the rules of evidence. 45 The North Carolina Supreme Court has ruled that to successfully challenge a tax assessment before the Commission, the taxpayer must show that (1) the assessor used an arbitrary or illegal method of valuation and (2) the assessment substantially exceeds the true value in money of the property. 46 Hearings before the Commission on the assessed valuation of properties typically involve battles between expert witnesses, including appraisers, cost estimators and engineers, and generally turn on questions of the highest and best use of the property, the determination of obsolescence and depreciation under the cost approach to value, the comparability of comparable sales under the market data approach to value, and calculations of net operating income and its appropriate capitalization, or use of the discounted cash flow method, under the income approach to value. E. Judicial Review. Any party aggrieved by a final order or decision of the Commission may appeal to the North Carolina Court of Appeals by filing with the Commission within thirty (30) days after entry of the final decision or order being appealed a notice of appeal and a statement of alleged errors made by the Commission in its decision. 47 The appealing party must also serve notice of the appeal on all other parties to the action and perfect the appeal in the Court of Appeals in accordance with the Rules of Appellate Procedure. Either the taxpayer or the taxing jurisdiction may appeal the decision of the Court of Appeals - 5 -

to the North Carolina Supreme Court as provided in the Rules of Appellate Procedure. F. Action Brought Directly in Superior Court. A taxpayer may, in certain circumstances, bypass administrative appeals of its property tax assessment and seek judicial review in a state trial court by filing with the city or county that imposed the tax a demand for the release of any tax assessed but not paid or, in the event that the taxpayer has already paid the tax, a claim for refund. 48 This procedure is available only in instances where the taxpayer alleges that the property tax was imposed through clerical error, an illegal tax, or a tax levied for an illegal purpose. It would not, for instance, apply where the taxpayer challenges the appraised value of its property. 49 If the taxing body does not grant the requested release or refund within ninety (90) days after receipt of the request, the taxpayer may file suit against the taxing body for the tax amount claimed. 50 If the taxpayer sought a release from an unpaid property tax and did not receive the requested release of the tax from the taxing body, the taxpayer must first pay the tax due before filing suit. The taxpayer in that circumstance may file suit within three (3) years after payment of the tax. A taxpayer filing suit after the 90-day period for approval of his refund claim has passed must file suit within three (3) years after the date when the governing body was required to act on the taxpayer s refund claim. 51 Conclusion The assessment and appeals procedure set forth in the Machinery Act are comprehensive. Failure to follow its procedures may result in dismissal of a taxpayer s appeal but an understanding of them will allow attorneys to assist their clients in resolving property tax disputes and possibly reduce their tax assessments. Charles B. Neely, Jr. and Nancy S. Rendleman are engaged in the practice of state and local litigation with Williams Mullen. Steven B. Long of the firm also contributed to the article. This article originally appeared in the Winter 2001 edition of the North Carolina State Bar Journal. Endnotes: 1 NC Const., Art. V, Sec. 2 and Sec. 3. 2 G.S. 105-275 et seq. 3 G.S. 105-277 et seq. 4 G.S. 105-271 et seq. 5 G.S. 105-283. 6 NC Const., Art. V, Sec. 2; N.C.G.S. 105-284. 7 117 N.C. App. 484, 451 S.E.2d 641 (1995) 343 N.C. 426, 471 S.E.2d 342, U.S. cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1112, 117 S.C. 952 (1997). - 6 -

8 G.S. 105-285. 9 G.S.105-285 and G.S.105-286. 10 G.S. 105-287. See Appeal of Allred, 351 NC 1, 519 SE2d 52 (1999). 11 G.S 105-317. 12 258 N.C. 398, 128 S.E.2d 855 (1963) 13 N.C.G.S. 105-287(b). See Appeal of Hotel L Europe, 116 N.C. App. 651, 654, 448 S.E.2d 865, 866 (1994) disc. review denied 339 N.C. 612, 454 S.E.2d 252 (1995). 14 G.S. 105-322(g)(2). 15 G.S. 105-322(a). 16 G.S. 105-322(e). 17 G.S. 105-322(g)(2)(a). 18 G.S. 105-322(e) and (g)(2). 19 G.S. 105-322(g). 20 Id. 21 See Brock v. North Carolina Property Tax Commission, 290 N.C. 731, 228 S.E.2d 254 (1976). See also In Re Appeal of Whiteside Estates, Inc. 136 N.C. App. 360, 525 S.E.2d 196 (2000). 22 G.S. 105-312. 23 G.S. 105-312(f) and (g). 24 G.S. 105-312(d). 25 Id. 26 Id. 27 Id. 28 In Re Philip Morris USA, 335 NC 227, 436 SE2d 828 (1993), cert. denied 335 NC 566, 441 SE2d 118, 512 US 1228, 114 S.Ct. 2726 (1994). 29 G.S. 105-335. 30 G.S. 105-337. 31 G.S. 105-338. 32 G.S. 105-339. 33 G.S. 105-284(b). 34 Certain class 1 railroads have won injunctive relief in federal court entitling them to relief from discrimination under 49 USC 11503 (the 4R Act ) if the level of assessment of real estate is 95% or less. This relief is afforded annually. 35 G.S. 105-342; G.S. 105-284(c). 36 G.S. 105-290; G.S. 105-342(b). 37 G.S. 105-288. 38 G.S. 105-290(e). See In Re Appeal of Intermedia Communications, Inc., 144 NC App., (2001) which sanctions appeals filed by fax. 39 G.S. 105-342(b). 40 G.S. 105-284(c). 41 17 N.C.A.C. 11.0216. 42 17 N.C.A.C. 11.0218. 43 G.S. 105-290(d). 44 G.S. 105-290(b). 45 G.S. 8C-1. 46 In re Appeal of Amp, 287 N.C. 547, 563, 215 S.E.2d 752, 762 (1975). 47 G.S.105-345. 48 G.S.105-381. 49 G.S. 105-381, Edward Valves, Inc. v. Wake County, 117 N.C. App. 484, 489, 451 S.E.2d 641, 645 (N.C.App. 1995), aff=d in part, 343 N.C. 426, 471 S.E.2d 342 (1996) (AIf a taxpayer disagrees with a county=s valuation of its property, the taxpayer must pursue and exhaust its administrative remedies before resorting to the courts Questions concerning valuation which are first presented directly to the courts are properly dismissed.@) (citations omitted). - 7 -

50 Id. 51 G.S 105-381(c). - 8 -