For Review Only. Sex-specific development of asthma differs between farm and non-farm children - a. cohort study. Jon Genuneit. Online Data Supplement



Similar documents
Package childsds. February 19, 2015

Nutritional Epidemiology

Body Mass Index as a measure of obesity

A simple guide to classifying body mass index in children. June 2011

Child Obesity and Socioeconomic Status

General and Abdominal Adiposity and Risk of Death in Europe

The National Survey of Children s Health The Child

The Cross-Sectional Study:

Diet, Physical Activity, and Sedentary Behaviors as Risk Factors for Childhood Obesity: An Urban and Rural Comparison

PRACTICE PROBLEMS FOR BIOSTATISTICS

Weight-for-age percentiles: Boys, birth to 36 months

International comparisons of obesity prevalence

Confounding in health research

Case-control studies. Alfredo Morabia

Elementary Statistics

Tips for surviving the analysis of survival data. Philip Twumasi-Ankrah, PhD

Appendix G STATISTICAL METHODS INFECTIOUS METHODS STATISTICAL ROADMAP. Prepared in Support of: CDC/NCEH Cross Sectional Assessment Study.

Def: The standard normal distribution is a normal probability distribution that has a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1.

Depression is a debilitating condition that places

Challenges in Longitudinal Data Analysis: Baseline Adjustment, Missing Data, and Drop-out

National Child Measurement Programme: England, 2011/12 school year

An Evaluation of the 215GO! Child Obesity Program in the Philadelphia Health Centers. Daniel Morris Walker. Drexel University.

In an experimental study there are two types of variables: Independent variable (I will abbreviate this as the IV)

Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional studies

Linear Models in STATA and ANOVA

Missing data and net survival analysis Bernard Rachet

How To Register Your Child For A Heart Defect Survey In Germany

Diabetes Prevention in Latinos

Placement Stability and Number of Children in a Foster Home. Mark F. Testa. Martin Nieto. Tamara L. Fuller

2. Incidence, prevalence and duration of breastfeeding

Reflections on Probability vs Nonprobability Sampling

The Early Employment and Further Education Experiences of High School Dropouts: A Comparative Study of the United States and Australia

Guided Reading 9 th Edition. informed consent, protection from harm, deception, confidentiality, and anonymity.

HAWAI`I HEALTH SURVEY HHS INTRODUCTION 2002

Module 223 Major A: Concepts, methods and design in Epidemiology

Title: Proton Pump Inhibitors and the risk of pneumonia: a comparison of cohort and self-controlled case series designs

2016 PQRS OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: CLAIMS, REGISTRY

CHILDHOOD CANCER SURVIVOR STUDY Analysis Concept Proposal

A Large, Randomized, Prospective Study of the Impact of a Pre-Run Stretch on the Risk of Injury in Teenage and Older Runners

Missing Data in Longitudinal Studies: To Impute or not to Impute? Robert Platt, PhD McGill University

CARDIOVASCULAR PROBLEMS IN SURVIVORS OF CHILDHOOD CANCER AND THEIR SIBLINGS

NCQA PCMH 2011 Standards, Elements and Factors Documentation Guideline/Data Sources

How to choose an analysis to handle missing data in longitudinal observational studies

Obesity and hypertension among collegeeducated black women in the United States

Prognostic impact of uric acid in patients with stable coronary artery disease

MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Analysis of Regression Based on Sampling Weights in Complex Sample Survey: Data from the Korea Youth Risk Behavior Web- Based Survey

Topic: Male Factor Infertility

Mortality Assessment Technology: A New Tool for Life Insurance Underwriting

Body Mass Index of Nevada Students School Year

TECHNIQUES OF DATA PRESENTATION, INTERPRETATION AND ANALYSIS

Living a happy, healthy and satisfying life Tineke de Jonge, Christianne Hupkens, Jan-Willem Bruggink, Statistics Netherlands,

Supplementary appendix

Farm Business Survey - Statistical information

Mind on Statistics. Chapter 4

Study Design and Statistical Analysis

education department unrwa school dropout: an agency wide study

13. Poisson Regression Analysis

Predictors of recovery and legal representation in a compensation setting 12 months post injury: The Whiplash Outcome Study [WOS]

Non-replication of interaction between cannabis use and trauma in predicting psychosis. & Jim van Os

BMI Screening Program. Training Manual West Capitol Avenue Suite 300, Victory Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201

Mode and Patient-mix Adjustment of the CAHPS Hospital Survey (HCAHPS)

Fairfield Public Schools

WHO-Referenzkurven für das Wachstum von Mädchen (Perzentile)

EHR4CR ENABLING PROACTIVE RESEARCH

Business Statistics. Successful completion of Introductory and/or Intermediate Algebra courses is recommended before taking Business Statistics.

The SURVEYFREQ Procedure in SAS 9.2: Avoiding FREQuent Mistakes When Analyzing Survey Data ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION SURVEY DESIGN 101 WHY STRATIFY?

Department/Academic Unit: Public Health Sciences Degree Program: Biostatistics Collaborative Program

Online Appendix for the paper Saving Lives: Evidence from a Conditional Food Supplementation Program

Self-Check and Review Chapter 1 Sections

Social determinants of mental health in childhood a gene-environment perspective.

National Life Tables, United Kingdom:

Hormones and cardiovascular disease, what the Danish Nurse Cohort learned us

Getting Better Information from Country Consumers for Better Rural Health Service Responses

1.0 Abstract. Title: Real Life Evaluation of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Canadians taking HUMIRA. Keywords. Rationale and Background:

Lung Function Increases With Increasing Level of Physical Activity in School Children

Introduction to mixed model and missing data issues in longitudinal studies

Form B-1. Inclusion form for the effectiveness of different methods of toilet training for bowel and bladder control

Turkey - Vocational Training Program for the Unemployed Impact Evaluation

Using Proxy Measures of the Survey Variables in Post-Survey Adjustments in a Transportation Survey

Epidemiological studies on adolescents and alcohol

PROGRAMA DE SALUD INTEGRAL EN MEDIO EDUCATIVO

WAITING FOR TREATMENT: A SURVEY

Obesity in America: A Growing Trend

Ethnic group differences in overweight and obese children and young people in England: cross-sectional survey

Seniors Choice of Online vs. Print Response in the 2011 Member Health Survey 1. Nancy P. Gordon, ScD Member Health Survey Director April 4, 2012

Traditional View of Diabetes. Are children with type 1 diabetes obese: What can we do? 8/9/2012. Change in Traditional View of Diabetes

Descriptive Methods Ch. 6 and 7

Re-analysis using Inverse Probability Weighting and Multiple Imputation of Data from the Southampton Women s Survey

A CASE-CONTROL STUDY OF DOG BITE RISK FACTORS IN A DOMESTIC SETTING TO CHILDREN AGED 9 YEARS AND UNDER

WORKERS COMPENSATION & BODY MASS INDEX YOU CAN T AFFORD TO WEIGHT! Synergy Coverage Solutions, LLC

Research Methods & Experimental Design

Completeness of Physician Billing Claims for Diabetes Prevalence Estimation

Physiotherapy-Based Rehabilitation after Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty. CURRENT AUSTRALIAN PRACTICE Hart AJ, Chua MJ, Naylor JM, Mittal R, Harris IA

The Procedures of Monte Carlo Simulation (and Resampling)

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF SAFETY DATA IN LONG-TERM CLINICAL TRIALS

Missing data in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) can

Long-term impact of childhood bereavement

Mary B Codd. MD, MPH, PhD, FFPHMI UCD School of Public Health, Physiotherapy & Pop. Sciences

World War II, Missing Men, And Out-Of-Wedlock Childbearing

Transcription:

Page 12 of 18 1 2 Sex-specific development of asthma differs between farm and non-farm children - a cohort study. 3 Jon Genuneit 4 5 Online Data Supplement

Page 13 of 18 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Methods A prospective, population-based cohort study was conducted in rural areas around Ulm (Baden-Württemberg), southern Germany, with baseline assessment among 6-10 year old school children in 2006 as part of the GABRIELA study. Details of the study are published elsewhere.(e1) In brief, from n=23,040 participants in Baden-Württemberg, n=11,169 agreed to participate in a second phase of baseline including an in-depth assessment of environmental exposure and potential follow-ups. Disproportionate random samples 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 stratified for categories of exposure to farming environments were drawn (in total n=2,497). Of these, parental questionnaires for 2,248 children were received. Figure E1 depicts the participation at each follow-up. The ethics committee of Ulm University approved the study. Accounting for the complex survey design, the data were analyzed with stratified weighted cox and logistic regression models using the Taylor series method to estimate variances. The sampling weights were calculated as fixed weights scaling the 2,248 baseline participants up to the 11,169 eligible participants. The baseline assessment was conducted in elementary schools which in the German school system have four grades spanning mostly from age six to ten years. Thus, at baseline in 2006, children from four consecutive years of birth (roughly 1996 2000) were recruited. In the follow-up in 2013, most of the children were therefore 13 17 years old, the age at which they were censored. Because they are approximately equally distributed across the four consecutive years of birth, about 25% are censored with each year from age 13 years onwards. The children s body weight and height was measured by trained fieldworkers at baseline and was parent-reported at the follow-ups in 2011-2013. The parents were encouraged to measure weight and height and to indicate whether they provide measured or estimated figures. At the follow-ups in 2011, 2012, and 2013, the proportion of parents who indicated measured figures for both, weight and height, were 84%, 79%, and 78%, respectively. In addition, in 2013, the parents were asked to copy the child s body weight and

Page 14 of 18 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 height from routine health examinations which are performed and documented by the caring pediatricians around the ages of 3 days, 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, and 9 years. The child s body mass index (BMI) was calculated as body weight divided by body height squared at each age at which both figures were available and standardized on German reference data.(e2) For the present analyses, BMI from age four years onwards was included. This was deemed sufficient because asthma diagnosis was only analyzed from age six years onwards. Children below the 10 th percentile were classified as underweight, children above 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 the 90 th percentile were classified as overweight, and children in between were classified as normal (reference). The median number of available BMI measurements was five. Since BMI can change over time, BMI was fitted as a time-dependent explanatory variable in the stratified weighted cox regression models. At ages at which no BMI measurement was available, the BMI was imputed to be the previous measured BMI. In the logistic regression models, BMI in the year of life preceding asthma diagnosis or end of observation was fitted as a covariate. Physical activity was not included as a covariate because it was shown in the Swiss GABRIELA cohort that physical activity did not mediate or confound the protective farmeffect on asthma.(e3) Furthermore, in the Ulm cohort, data on physical activity was only ascertained at baseline at which the children were roughly six to ten years old. Supposedly, physical activity is age-dependent but this study lacks data on physical activity at various ages including the year of life preceding asthma diagnosis for most of the asthma cases and the year of life preceding the end of observation for most of the other participants. Thus, unlike BMI, physical activity could not be modelled as a time-dependent exposure or in relation to the age at asthma diagnosis which was a further reason why physical activity was not considered as a covariate.

Page 15 of 18 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 References E1. Genuneit J, Büchele G, Waser M, Kovacs K, Debinska A, Boznanski A, Strunz-Lehner C, Horak E, Cullinan P, Heederik D, Braun-Fahrländer C, von Mutius E. The GABRIEL Advanced Surveys: study design, participation and evaluation of bias. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2011;25:436 447. E2. Kromeyer-Hauschild K, Wabitsch M, Kunze D, Geller F, Geiß HC, Hesse V, von Hippel A, Jaeger U, Johnsen D, Korte W, Menner K, Müller G, Müller JM, Niemann-Pilatus A, 63 64 65 66 67 68 Remer T, Schaefer F, Wittchen H-U, Zabransky S, Zellner K, Ziegler A, Hebebrand J. Perzentile für den Body-mass-Index für das Kindes- und Jugendalter unter Heranziehung verschiedener deutscher Stichproben. Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde 2001;149:807 818. E3. Bringolf-Isler B, Graf E, Waser M, Genuneit J, von Mutius E, Loss G, Kriemler S, Braun- Fahrländer C. Association of physical activity, asthma, and allergies: a cohort of farming and nonfarming children. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2013;132:743 746.e4. 69

Page 16 of 18 Baseline (2006/07) n=2248 for details see Ref. E15 1 st Follow-up (2010) n=1928 (87%) drop out n=27 2 nd Follow-up (2011) n=1804 (81%) drop out n=75 3 rd Follow-up (2012) n=1770 (82%) drop out n=62 4 th Follow-up (2013) n=1547 (74%) Net study population with at least one follow-up n=2064 (92%) 70 71 72 1 follow-up: 52 (3%) 2 follow-ups: 171 (8%) 3 follow-ups: 461 (22%) 4 follow-ups: 1380 (67%) Figure E1: Flow chart of follow-up including the year of assessment and participation in n (%) after correction for drop-out

Page 17 of 18 73 Table E1: Characteristics of the study population (in unweighted n (weighted %)) all farm non-farm girls boys 2,064 872 (11.5) 1,181 (88.5) 1,037 (50.4) 1,027 (49.6) 74 number of siblings 0 128 (7.8) 34 (3.7) 91 (8.2) 65 (7.7) 63 (8.3) 1 820 (45.5) 280 (33.4) 535 (47.2) 405 (46.3) 415 (44.7) 2 760 (30.8) 334 (37.0) 370 (30.0) 352 (30.5) 354 (31.1) 3 402 (15.7) 223 (25.8) 178 (14.5) 210 (15.5) 192 (15.9) familial allergies 997 (55.1) 352 (41.7) 640 (56.9) 512 (57.0) 485 (53.1) parental smoking 1069 (58.6) 370 (46.3) 691 (60.1) 546 (59.2) 523 (58.1) parental high education 538 (31.0) 150 (17.4) 386 (33.0) 266 (30.9) 272 (31.2) body mass index (BMI) 1 underweight 99 (6.0) 34 (4.3) 65 (6.3) 47 (6.4) 52 (5.6) normal 1830 (90.1) 777 (90.1) 1043 (90.0) 919 (88.8) 911 (91.4) overweight 87 (3.9) 46 (5.6) 41 (3.7) 51 (4.8) 36 (3.0) asthma diagnosis 191 (10.7) 59 (6.8) 132 (11.4) 86 (10.3) 105 (11.2) 75 1 in the year of life preceding asthma diagnosis or end of observation

Page 18 of 18 76 Table E2: Characteristics of the study population stratified by living on a farm at baseline and sex (in unweighted n (weighted %)) farm non-farm girls boys girls boys 446 (5.8) 426 (5.7) 588 (44.0) 593 (44.5) 77 78 number of siblings 0 16 (3.1) 18 (4.4) 49 (8.3) 42 (8.1) 1 131 (30.8) 149 (36.0) 273 (48.4) 262 (46.1) 2 176 (39.0) 158 (35.1) 175 (29.3) 195 (30.8) 3 122 (27.1) 101 (24.5) 87 (14.0) 91 (15.0) familial allergies 184 (41.7) 168 (41.6) 327 (59.3) 313 (54.7) parental smoking 197 (45.9) 173 (46.7) 347 (61.0) 344 (59.3) parental high education 75 (16.3) 75 (18.5) 190 (32.9) 196 (33.1) body mass index (BMI) 1 underweight 13 (3.0) 21 (5.6) 34 (6.9) 31 (5.7) normal 403 (91.8) 374 (88.5) 514 (88.4) 529 (91.6) overweight 25 (5.2) 21 (5.9) 26 (4.7) 15 (2.7) asthma diagnosis 25 (5.7) 34 (7.9) 61 (11.0) 71 (11.7) 1 in the year of life preceding asthma diagnosis or end of observation