SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE



Similar documents
SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA DOMESTIC RELATIONS PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION 140

THE COURTS. Title 231 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

TAX ASSESSMENT APPEALS

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CHAPTER 200. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION; GENERAL PROVISIONS

CHAPTER FORECLOSURE OF MORTGAGES OF REAL PROPERTY BY ADVERTISEMENT

Appellate Court Procedural Rules Committee

RULE 21 FORECLOSURE, QUIET TITLE AND PARTITION ACTIONS (Amended after passage of 2008 H.B. 138, eff )

LIMITED SCOPE REPRESENTATION

Appellate Court Procedural Rules Committee

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE GARNISHMENT CHAPTER 77

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE

Compulsory Arbitration

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appeal of: The Buzbee Law Firm No EDA 2014

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

J-A Trial Court Order, 10/30/00, at 1].

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION

SMALL CLAIMS RULES. (d) Record of Proceedings. A record shall be made of all small claims court proceedings.

DEBT MANAGEMENT BOND

: : : : : : : : : : : : Appellants

MORTGAGE LOAN CORRESPONDENT BOND ADVANCE FEES

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

INTRODUCTION no later than Monday, March 17, 2008.

Discovery Expert Reports

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS

BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : : : : : :

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT, PREBLE COUNTY, OHIO

RULES OF THE TAX APPEAL COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

REVISED SCHEDULE OF CHARGES, COSTS AND FEES TO BE CHARGED BY THE CLERKS OF THE CIRCUIT COURTS UNDER COURTS ARTICLE, Effective July 1, 2015

United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. In re: Robert Xxxxxx : Chapter 13 Debtor : Bky. No.

FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY. Order

2014 PA Super 248. : PENNSYLVANIA Appellee : : : : :

RULES PROMULGATED UNDER THE WINDING-UP ACT, RSC. 1985, C. W-10

CHAPTER FORECLOSURE OF REAL ESTATE MORTGAGES BY ACTION

2015 IL App (5th) U NO IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT

2015 IL App (1st) U. No IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

SECOND AMENDED ORDER DESIGNATING ALL CASES E-FILE AND SETTING FORTH CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS IN E-FILE CASES

Volume 32 Number 43 Saturday, October 26, 2002 Harrisburg, Pa. Pages

HOW TO FILE A PETITION TO EXPUNGE JUVENILE OFFENSES

Judicial Council of Virginia. Report to the General Assembly and Supreme Court of Virginia

RULES FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINARY ENFORCEMENT OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Rule 82.1 Who May Appear as Counsel; Who May Appear Pro Se

Child Support In Philadelphia

Rules of Construction RULE 51 TITLE AND CITATION OF RULES. These Rules shall be known as Court of Common Pleas of Monroe County, 43 rd

New Changes to the Probate Code

2014 IL App (3d) U. Order filed January 9, 2014 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT A.D., 2014 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER

History: Add. 1971, Act 19, Imd. Eff. May 5, 1971; Am. 1976, Act 89, Imd. Eff. Apr. 17, 1976.

LACKAWANNA COUNTY RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

Civil Suits: The Process

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Michigan Supreme Court State Court Administrative Office Michigan Hall of Justice P.O. Box Lansing, Michigan Phone (517)

CALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION

APPENDIX A IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Reports or Connecticut Appellate Reports, the

ANSWER PACKET NON-SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS ON PREPARING AN ANSWER

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL INTRODUCED BY GORDNER, BAKER, EICHELBERGER, RAFFERTY, FOLMER, VULAKOVICH AND MENSCH, JUNE 8, 2015

RULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY RULE 5:7

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No WDA 2014

Chapter 153. Violations and Fines 2013 EDITION. Related Laws Page 571 (2013 Edition)

ORDER I. COURT ADMINISTRATION

CONTEMPT OF CUSTODY ORDER SELF-HELP KIT

HF No. 137, 2007/08 Continental Western Insurance Company v. South Dakota Subsequent Injury Fund (Teresa A. Stellingwerf, SIF 1193)

;-:-CV cj-0 I~ No PJ

RULE 1. ASSIGNMENT OF CASES

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT CHANCERY DIVISION

pin THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL DIVISION

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

b. Upon receipt of the copy of the complaint, the Court Administrator shall assign the case to a Judge according to the following procedure:

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellees No. 320 EDA 2014

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA WESTERN DIVISION MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

George J. Badey, III, Philadelphia, for petitioner. Robert F. Kelly, Jr., Media, for respondent.

West Virginia Divorce Laws

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM

Appeal Bonds, Sureties, and Stays

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT LUCINDA G. MILLER; ELAINE KING-MILLER, Plaintiffs-Appellees

How To File An Appeal In The United States

THE FORECLOSURE PROCESS IN PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

United States Bankruptcy Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania LOCAL BANKRUPTCY RULES

CHAPTER 42A HEARINGS AND APPEALS. Act shall mean the Casino Control Act, N.J.S.A. 5:12-1 et seq.

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA CHAPTER 13 PLAN [MOTION FOR FRBP RULE 3012 VALUATION HEARING]

2015 IL App (5th) U NO IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AMENDED COMPLAINT I. INTRODUCTION

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

Misc. Docket No. f ( '9256

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION

M e m o r a n d u m. June 16, Certification Applicants. From: Libby Davis, Associate Dean for Student Affairs. Process for Certification

Transcription:

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE Proposed Recommendation No. 233 Amendment of Rule 3281 et seq. Governing Proceedings to Fix Fair Market Value of Real Property Sold The Civil Procedural Rules Committee proposes that Rule of Civil Procedure 3281 et seq. governing proceedings to fix fair market value of real property sold be amended as set forth herein. The proposed recommendation is being submitted to the bench and bar for comments and suggestions prior to its submission to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. All communications in reference to the proposed recommendation should be sent no later than August 22, 2008 to: Karla M. Shultz, Esquire Counsel Civil Procedural Rules Committee 5035 Ritter Road, Suite 700 Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania 17055 or E-Mail to civil.rules@pacourts.us The Explanatory Comment which appears in connection with the proposed recommendation has been inserted by the Committee for the convenience of the bench and bar. It will not constitute part of the rules of civil procedure or be officially adopted or promulgated by the Court.

Rule 237.1. Notice of Praecipe for Entry of Judgment of Non Pros for Failure to File Complaint or by Default for Failure to Plead (a)(1) As used in this rule, judgment of non pros means a judgment entered by praecipe pursuant to Rule 1037(a) and 1659; Note: When a defendant appeals from a judgment entered in a magisterial district [judge] court, Pa. R.C.P.M.D.J. 1004 authorizes the appellant to file a praecipe for a rule as of course upon the appellee to file a complaint or suffer entry of a judgment of non pros. The entry of the judgment of non pros is governed by Pa. R.C.P. No. 1037(a) and is subject to this rule. judgment by default means a judgment entered by praecipe pursuant to Rules 1037, 1511(a), 3031(a), and 3146(a). (2) No judgment of non pros for failure to file a complaint or by default for failure to plead shall be entered by the prothonotary unless the praecipe for entry includes a certification that a written notice of intention to file the praecipe was mailed or delivered (i) in the case of a judgment of non pros, after the failure to file a complaint and at least ten days prior to the date of the filing of the praecipe to the party s attorney of record or to the party if unrepresented, or (ii) in the case of a judgment by default, after the failure to plead to a complaint and at least ten days prior to the date of the filing of the praecipe to the party against whom judgment is to be entered and to the party s attorney of record, if any. The ten-day notice period in subdivision (a)(2)(i) and (ii) shall be calculated forward from the date of the mailing or delivery, in accordance with Rule 106. Note: The final sentence of Rule 237.1(a)(2) alters the practice described in the decision of Williams v. Wade, 704 A.2d 132 (Pa. Super. 1997). 1

(3) A copy of the notice shall be attached to the praecipe. (4) The notice and certification required by this rule may not be waived. Note: A certification of notice is a prerequisite in all cases to the entry by praecipe of a judgment of non pros for failure to plead to a complaint. Once the ten-day notice has been given, no further notice is required by the rule even if the time to file the complaint or to plead to the complaint has been extended by agreement. See Rule 237.4 for the form of the notice of intention to enter a judgment of non pros and Rule 237.5 for the form of the notice of intention to enter a judgment by default. This rule does not apply to a judgment entered (1) by an order of court, (2) upon praecipe pursuant to an order of court, or (3) pursuant to a rule to show cause. Note: See Rule 3284 which requires that in proceedings to fix fair market value of real property sold, notice must be given pursuant to the requirements of Rule 237.1 et seq. Rule 3281. (a) Parties The petition shall name the judgment creditor as petitioner. The petition [shall] may name as respondent any debtor, obligor, guarantor, mortgagor, and any other person directly or indirectly liable to the judgment creditor for the payment of the debt, and any owner of the property affected thereby. 2

Rule 3283. [(a) Service The petition shall be served (1) upon a respondent who is a defendant in the judgment who has entered an appearance, by the petitioner in the matter provided by Rule 440, and (2) upon any other respondent] (a)(1) If there is an attorney of record, service shall be made upon the respondent s attorney of record pursuant to Rule 440(a)(1)(i) or (ii). (2) If there is no attorney of record, service shall be made (i) by the sheriff or a competent adult in the manner prescribed by Rule 402(a) for service of original process, or Note: See Rule 72 for the definition of competent adult. (ii) by the petitioner mailing a copy in the manner prescribed by Rule 403, or (iii) if service cannot be made as provided in subparagraphs (i) or (ii), pursuant to special order of court as prescribed by Rule 430. The person servicing the petition shall file a return of service as provided by Rule 405. 3

Rule 3284. Order Upon Default or Admission [The court shall, without further notice or hearing, enter an order determining the fair market value of the real property to be the value alleged in the petition, determining the prior lien amounts to be in the amounts alleged in the petition and making any special allocation requested by the petition if (1) no answer is filed within the required time to a petition which contains a notice to defend and notice has been given as provided by Rule 237.1 et seq., or (2) an answer is filed which does not deny the allegations in the petition as to the fair market value, the prior lien amounts or any special allocation.] (a) The prothonotary, on praecipe of the petitioner, shall enter judgment against the defendant for the failure to file within the required time an answer to the petition, which contains a notice to defend substantially in the form set forth in Rule 3282, upon determining that (1) the petition was served pursuant to the requirements of Rule 3283 and (2) notice was given pursuant to the requirements of Rule 237.1 et seq. In all cases, the court, on motion of a party, may enter an appropriate judgment against a party if an answer was filed, but does not deny the allegations in the petition as to the fair market value, prior lien amounts, and any special allocation. 4

Explanatory Comment The Civil Procedural Rules Committee is proposing to amend Rule 3281 et seq. governing proceedings to fix fair market value of real property sold in two respects. First, current Rule 3283(a)(1) provides for a petition to fix fair market value to be served upon a respondent, who is a defendant in the judgment and who entered an appearance, pursuant to Rule 440 governing service of legal papers other than original process. Under Rule 440, service may be made by regular mail at the last known address of the defendant. A problem arises in that the petition to fix fair market value is only filed after a sheriff s sale, and frequently the property that has been sold is the address at which the defendant resided prior to the sheriff s sale and is no longer a current address. Under these circumstances, service by regular mail at the last known address is not likely to furnish notice to the defendant. The proposed amendment to Rule 3283 would permit service pursuant to Rule 440 only if there is an attorney of record. Second, current Rule 3284 provides that the court shall without further notice or hearing enter an order determining the fair market value of the property to be the value alleged in the petition if (1) no answer has been filed within the required time to a petition which includes a notice to defend and notice has been given pursuant to Rule 237.1, or (2) an answer is filed which does not deny the allegations in the petition as to the fair market value, the prior lien amounts, or any special allocation. New subdivision (a) shifts to the prothonotary the responsibility for entering judgment upon a praecipe of the petitioner, in which there is an averment that no answer to the petition has been filed within the required time. The prothonotary will ensure that the record shows that (1) service was made pursuant to the requirements of Rule 3283, (2) an important notice was given pursuant to the requirements of Rule 237.1, (3) no answer was filed, and (4) the allegations in the petition justify the amount of the judgment that the petitioner seeks. 5

By the Civil Procedural Rules Committee R. Stanton Wettick, Jr. Chair 6