Disclosure compliance system Seven questions directors should ask

Similar documents
Quality of earnings Focus on integrity and quality

Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) 26 February 2015

Advance Pricing Agreement Frequently Asked Questions

Clear, transparent reporting The new auditor s report

The Changing SAS 70 Landscape Dan Hirstein Director Rebecca Goodpasture Senior Manager Deloitte & Touche LLP January 13, 2011

Centre for Corporate Governance. Sample listing of fraud schemes

U.S. CFO Program The Four Faces of the CFO Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu

Risk committee performance evaluation

Managing the message. Businesses brace for new digital marketing compliance requirements

Sample risk committee charter

Centre for Corporate Governance. Managing the business risk of fraud: New guidance for a new risk environment

The Federal Circuit Affirms a Court of Federal Claims Decision Dismissing Foreign Tax Credit Refund Claims as Untimely

POV on Draft Guidelines on Managing Risks and Code of Conduct in Outsourcing of Financial Services by NBFCs

Driving through the consumer s mind: Steps in the buying process. December 2014 For private circulation only

Demystifying Capital calculations. October 23, 2008

Appointment of the audit committee and independence requirements

Customer Retention Management

Service Organization Control (SOC) Reports

February Sample audit committee charter

GARMIN LTD. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES

The Companies Act Audit requirement and other matters related to the audit

Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority

Report 7 Appendix 1d Final Internal Audit Report Sundry Income and Debtors (inc. Fees and Charges) Greater London Authority February 2010

Australian business and immigration solutions Planning is your best protection

HR Business Partnering A Custom Approach

Service Organization Control (SOC) Reports Focus on SOC 2 Reporting Standard

ARDMORE SHIPPING CORPORATION AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404: Compliance Challenges for Foreign Private Issuers

Take the right steps 9 principles for building the Risk Intelligent Enterprise

Moving Forward with IT Governance and COBIT

Additional Aspects of Financial Reporting and Financial Analysis

Drastically stricter liability for executive officers in New Hungarian Civil Code Legal newsletter

Inspection of PricewaterhouseCoopers (Headquartered in Auckland, New Zealand) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

Question 2: Deloitte s Response:

Business Ethics and Compliance in the Sarbanes-Oxley Era A Survey by Deloitte and Corporate Board Member Magazine

NamCode. The Corporate Governance Code for Namibia

Report on Inspection of Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer (Headquartered in Tel Aviv, State of Israel) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

Report on Inspection of Deloitte AS (Headquartered in Oslo, Kingdom of Norway) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

GCC ediscovery survey How ready are you?

Supporting Compliance Management with Technology

Corporate Governance DIRECTORS SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS BOARD OF DIRECTORS

January Sample audit committee charter

Report on Inspection of Deloitte & Touche GmbH Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (Headquartered in Munich, Federal Republic of Germany)

STARWOOD HOTELS & RESORTS WORLDWIDE, INC. CHARTER OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Heads Up Presentation of Research & Development (R&D) tax offset

CPCAF Comfort Letter Procedures. Copyright 2005 by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Inc., New York, New York.

The Changing IT Risk Landscape Understanding and managing existing and emerging risks

Annual Assessment of the External Auditor

Diligent Corporation (Name of Issuer)

CHEVRON CORPORATION AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

Goodbye, SAS 70! Hello, SSAE 16!

International Forum of Independent Audit Regulators Report on 2014 Survey of Inspection Findings March 3, 2015

November 21, Public Company Accounting Oversight Board 1666 K Street Washington, DC 20006

9. INVESTIGATING ACCOUNTANT S REPORT

PwC. Bill 198 Overview September 2004

The three lines of defence

The Auditor s Consideration of the Internal Audit Function in an Audit of Financial Statements

Copyright 2015 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. Member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited

FERRELLGAS CODE OF ETHICS FOR PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICERS

Centre for Corporate Governance. Fraud Response Management: Is your organization prepared to execute an efficient and effective response?

Inspection Observations Related to PCAOB Rules and Auditing Standards on Communications with Audit Committees

The views expressed in these slides are solely the views of the Investor Advisory Group members who prepared them and do not necessarily reflect the

Report on Inspection of Deloitte AS (Headquartered in Oslo, Kingdom of Norway) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

Information about 2015 Inspections

BOURSE SECURITIES LIMITED

Keeping the Patient First

Corporate Secretarial Services Your guide to corporate compliance

Fraud-Related Compliance

This is Appendix A: Sarbanes-Oxley and Other Recent Reforms, appendix 1 from the book Governing Corporations (index.html) (v. 1.0).

AMPLIFY SNACK BRANDS, INC. AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER. Adopted June 25, 2015

Wealth Advisory Services Winning with clients

OBSERVATIONS RELATED TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE AUDITING STANDARD ON ENGAGEMENT QUALITY REVIEW

Exposure Draft ED 259 Classification of Liabilities (Proposed amendments to AASB 101)

Inspection of Fazzari + Partners LLP Chartered Accountants (Headquartered in Vaughan, Canada) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

Rationalisation under LRS for Current and Capital Account Transactions

India regulations for mobile employees A preview

Annual Compensation & Benefits Trends Survey India FY

The Impact of FATCA on Mutual Funds and other Regulated, Open-ended Funds Closing the distance

How To Account For Insurance In Frs 103

INTERACTIVE BROKERS LLC (SEC I.D. No )

March Recruitment Services Recruitment Process Outsourcing (RPO)

Background. Audit Quality and Public Interest vs. Cost

Telecom Corporation of New Zealand Limited

MATTEL, INC. AMENDED AND RESTATED AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

Internal Audit at the University of Cambridge.

Sears Hometown and Outlet Stores, Inc. Audit Committee of the Board of Directors Charter

Amended and Restated. Charter of the Audit Committee. of the Board of Directors of. Tribune Publishing Company. (As Amended November 11, 2014)

Stakeholder Engagement

ING (US) ISSUANCE LLC REGISTRATION DOCUMENT

1. Listed companies must have a majority of independent directors (303A.01)

Audit Committee Institute Assessment of audit committees

ISAE 3402 and SSAE 16 (replacing SAS 70) Reinforcing confidence through demonstration of effective controls

Exposure Draft ED 2014/6 Disclosure Initiative (Proposed amendments to IAS 7)

BUSINESS ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)

Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404: Compliance Challenges for Foreign Private Issuers

Managing the message Canada s new anti-spam law sets a high bar

STANDING ADVISORY GROUP MEETING

How mature is the internal control framework at your service organisation? ISAE 3402 and SSAE 16: Reinforcing confidence through demonstration of

Wealth Advisory Services Winning with clients

CHARTER OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF EVERBANK FINANCIAL CORP

Transcription:

Disclosure compliance system Seven questions directors should ask

Introduction An effective disclosure compliance system is imperative in assisting directors to demonstrate due diligence in the fulfillment of their oversight responsibilities. The following questions have been developed to help directors assess the disclosure compliance system that has been established within their organizations. To be satisfied that the system in place is effective and sufficient, respondents must be able to respond in the affirmative to each of the seven questions listed below: Question Yes/no Related risks 1. Has management designed, documented and implemented a disclosure compliance system to ensure that the issuer meets all of its continuous disclosure obligations? 2. Does the disclosure compliance system include appropriate disclosure controls and procedures to ensure the disclosure compliance system is operating at the reasonable assurance level? 3. Are the disclosure controls and procedures aligned with the principal disclosure risks? 4. Have the CEO and CFO conducted a meaningful evaluation of the disclosure controls and procedures (upward and outward) to ensure they are, in fact, effective at the reasonable assurance level? 5. Have the CEO and CFO included in their evaluation of disclosure controls: An appropriate assessment of the design and operating effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting All relevant information relating to the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting? 6. Are the conclusions formed by the CEO and CFO resulting from this evaluation fairly stated in the MD&A? 7. Is it therefore reasonable to rely on the issuer s disclosure compliance system and on the CEO, CFO s evaluation of disclosure controls? Without documentation, it may be difficult to establish at a later date, that a well designed disclosure compliance system existed. If the disclosure compliance system does not contain effective disclosure controls and procedures it will be difficult to assert, with a reasonable level of assurance, that the system would achieve its objectives. Without effective alignment, major disclosure risks may not be controlled, minor risks may be excessively controlled and the risk of poor disclosure decisions is likely to increase. Without a meaningful evaluation and appropriate testing of controls, disclosure controls may appear to be well designed, but may not be operating effectively in practice, providing officers and directors with a false sense of comfort. If the CEO and CFO s evaluation of disclosure controls is not effective because it was either poorly planned (e.g., ignored key elements of internal control over financial reporting) or executed (e.g., did not involve testing the operating effectiveness of those elements of internal control over financial reporting that form an integral component of disclosure controls and procedures) then the risk of an incorrect conclusion on the effectiveness of disclosure controls is likely to increase. If the conclusions set forth in the MD&A do not reflect the findings obtained in the CEO and CFO evaluation, or other information on the effectiveness of disclosure controls (e.g., conclusions are inconsistent with the reports and observations made by the internal and external auditor); there may be a material misstatement. After considering the above questions and risks, a determination that it would not be reasonable to rely on the issuer s disclosure compliance system means that it is unlikely that a due diligence defence will be available to officers or directors. 3

Conclusion If you had a negative response to even one of the above questions, then it is critical that the issue be addressed diligently and in a timely fashion. A lack of action could leave your board members open to civil liability and unable to implement a due diligence defense. 4

Contact To explore these ideas further, contact your Lead Client Service Partner or Abhay Gupte Director, Deloitte Center for Corporate Governance, India Tel.: +91 (22) 6681 0600 Email: agupte@deloitte.com 5

In this material Deloitte refers to Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu India Private Limited (DTTIPL), a Company established under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, as amended. DTTIPL is a member firm of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, a Swiss Verein, whose member firms are legally separate and independent entity. Please see www.deloitte.com/about for a detailed description of the legal structure of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu and its member firms. This material contains general information on a particular subject or subjects and is not an exhaustive treatment of such subject(s). Accordingly, the information in this material is not intended to constitute accounting, tax, legal, investment, consulting, or other professional advice or services. The information is not intended to be relied upon as the sole basis for any decision which may affect you or your business. Before making any decision or taking any action that might affect your personal finances or business, you should consult a qualified professional adviser. None of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, its member firms, or its and their respective affiliates shall be responsible for any loss whatsoever sustained by any person who relies on this material and the information contained herein. 2009 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu India Private Limited.