Mastering Prejudgment Interest

Similar documents
Two Texas Cases That You Need To Know When You Settle Lawsuits Or Claims

Case 3:06-cv B-BD Document 84 Filed 10/24/07 Page 1 of 5 PageID 763 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

THE RIGHT TO INDEPENDENT COUNSEL

Wrongful Death Damages Exemplary Damages

Update on Statutory Damages Caps

Personal Injury Damages Exemplary Damages

Reverse and Render in part; Affirm in part; Opinion Filed December 29, In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

22 ND ANNUAL COOPER & SCULLY, P.C. INSURANCE SEMINAR

Tort Reform And House Bill 383: How Public Servants in Health Care Were Left Out in the Cold. by Stephen G. Wohleb

Navigating the Statute of Limitations in Texas

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

to add a number of affirmative defenses, including an allegation that Henry s claim was barred

Joint and Several Liability Under Texas Tort Law

NUMBER CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNINSURED/UNDERINSURED MOTORIST CLAIMS AFTER BRAINARD. By C. Brooks Schuelke. Perlmutter & Schuelke, LLP th

IS STOWERS A CHANGING?

Vertical Exhaustion & Occurrences

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Liability Insurer s Duty Not to Settle

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Case Document 11 Filed in TXSB on 04/27/11 Page 1 of 10

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV

FOR PROPERTY LOSS AND DAMAGE 1

How To Stop A Money Judgment On Appeal In Texas

Construction Defect Action Reform Act

Premises Liability of Contractors & Subcontractors

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

History: Add. 1971, Act 19, Imd. Eff. May 5, 1971; Am. 1976, Act 89, Imd. Eff. Apr. 17, 1976.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Fowler, Rodriguez, Kingsmill, Flint, Gray, & Chalos, L.L.P.

CUNDIFF V. STATE FARM: ALLOWING DOUBLE RECOVERY UNDER UIM COVERAGE

How To Get A Summary Judgment In A Well Service Case In Texas

Reverse and Render; Dismiss and Opinion Filed June 19, In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No.

STRUCTURED SETTLEMENTS

2005-C CHARLES ALBERT AND DENISE ALBERT v. FARM BUREAU INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL. (Parish of Lafayette)

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas

NO CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas

Case 3:09-cv B Document 23 Filed 09/23/09 Page 1 of 8 PageID 649 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

TEXAS TORT REFORMS Appeal Bond Reform: HB 4 (2003). Asbestos/Silica Litigation Reform: SB 15 (2005).

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

REVERSE, RENDER, and REMAND; and Opinion Filed August 20, In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No.

TEXAS RICE LAND PARTNERS, LTD. V. DENBURY GREEN PIPELINE-TEXAS, LLC: TEXAS EMINENT DOMAIN LAW AND THE NOT-SO-COMMON COMMON CARRIER STATUS

COMMERCIAL PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY COVERAGE FORM

Case 4:06-cv Document 12 Filed in TXSD on 05/25/06 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case 4:10-cv Document 103 Filed in TXSD on 10/09/13 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

INSURANCE COVERAGE HOW TO GET PAID. Henry Moore Advanced Personal Injury - State Bar of Texas

FEDERAL INCOME TAX AND PERSONAL INJURY JUDGMENTS AND SETTLEMENTS By Fred A. Simpson 1

In the Court of Appeals of Georgia

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV

Eleventh Court of Appeals

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV. MILENE COOPER, D/B/A ACE BAIL BONDS, Appellant V. MARK HUNT, Appellee

S13G1048. CARTER v. PROGRESSIVE MOUNTAIN INSURANCE. This Court granted a writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals in Carter

Birth Trauma: Litigating Medical Malpractice Cases in Numerous States

1 (5) The state and its agencies and subdivisions shall be liable for tort claims in the

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

TEXAS STATUTORY CAPS - FROM THE BEGINNING TO NOW

AFFIRM in Part, REVERSE in Part, and REMAND; Opinion Filed June 30, In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

South Australia LAW REFORM (CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE AND APPORTIONMENT OF LIABILITY) ACT 2001

If You re Going to the Courthouse, Please File this for Me: Ten Documents Which Must be Filed in the Trial Court to Preserve Error for Appeal

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

UNINSURED MOTORIST COVERAGE: THE CHALLENGE OF PUTTING THIRD-PARTY COVERAGE IN A FIRST-PARTY BOX

Chapter 74 Update. Diana L. Faust Michelle E. Robberson May 23, 2012

Construction Conference

PART 15--ADMINISTRATIVE CLAIMS UNDER FEDERAL TORT CLAIMS ACT

reverse the trial court s November 21, 2012 judgment awarding Frost $159, and render

Mut. Ins. Co., 565 S.W.2d 716, 726 (Mo. App. 1978). Nor is the carrier entitled to proceeds from any claim its insured may have against anyone else.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. Docket No. 1:13-cv WSD.

In The NO CV. UNITED STATES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, Appellant

1999, the decree ordered Molly to pay, as a part of the division of the marital estate, the $14,477

Post Judgment Interest Pre-Judgment Interest

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA


In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV

No CV IN THE FOR THE RAY ROBINSON,

Transcription:

Mastering Prejudgment Interest R. Brent Cooper Diana L. Faust Cooper & Scully, P.C. 900 Jackson Street, Suite 100 Tel: (214) 712-9500 Fax: (214) 712-9540 Brent.Cooper@CooperScully.com Diana.Faust@CooperScully.com www.cooperscully.com 2011 This paper and/or presentation provides information on general legal l issues. It is not intended to provide advice on any specific ic legal matter or factual situation, and should not be construed as defining Cooper and Scully, P.C.'s position in a particular situation. Each case must be evaluated d on its own facts. This information is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Readers should not act on this information without receiving professional legal counsel.

2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 Significance of Prejudgment 1,229,253 8,181,650 4,012,029 3,673,137 2,885,256 6,511,013 6,935,976 12,495,610 5,337,401 32,102,112 19,654,596 14,481,602 12,220,397 8,796,263 8,123,286 Interest Prejudgment Interest in Judgments by Year 35,000,000 30,000,000 25,000,000 20,000,000 15,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000 0 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 Closed Claim Data

Sources of Prejudgment Interest There are two legal sources for an award of prejudgment interest: (1) general principles of equity and (2) an enabling statute. Cavnar v. Quality Control Parking, Inc.,, 696 S.W.2d 549, 552 (Tex. 1985); Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Stahl Petroleum Co.,, 629 S.W.2d 480, 483-85 85 (Tex. 1978). See Johnson & Higgins of Texas, Inc. v. Kenneco Energy, Inc.,, 962 S.W.2d 507, 528 (1998). Cooper & Scully, P.C. 3

Sources of Prejudgment Interest Statutes- 304.102 Finance Code 2260.106 Government Code Cooper & Scully, P.C. 4

Sources of Prejudgment Interest Equity- If prejudgment interest is not authorized by statute, the court can award prejudgment interest under the general principles of equity. Perry Roofing v Olcott,, 744 SW2d 929 (Tex. 1988) Cooper & Scully, P.C. 5

History of Prejudgment Interest 1978: Equity as Basis (Economic Damages) Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Stahl Petroleum Co., 569 S.W.2d 480 (1978) 1985: Recoverable in Personal Injury Cases (Rate Tied to Statute) Cavnar v. Quality Control Parking,, 696 S.W.2d 549 (Tex. 1985) Tied to Statutory Rate & Compounded Accrual 180 days following injury or death Cooper & Scully, P.C. 6

History of Prejudgment Interest 1987: Tort Reform Codified and Modified Cavnar Rule Providing for Prejudgment Interest in Wrongful Death, Personal Injury, and Property Damage Cases Tex. Rev. Civ. Stat. Ann. art. 5069-1.05, 6 1997: Recodified Into Finance Code No Modification of Existing Statutory Law Cooper & Scully, P.C. 7

History of Prejudgment Interest 1998: Common Law Based on Art. 5069-1.05 Johnson & Higgins of Texas, Inc. v. Kenneco Energy, Inc.,, 962 S.W.2d 576 (Tex. 1998) 2003: House Bill 4 Accrual on Past Damages Only Rate adjusted down: 5% to 15% Simple Interest Cooper & Scully, P.C. 8

Rates of Prejudgment Interest State Courts: 304.103. PREJUDGMENT INTEREST RATE FOR WRONGFUL DEATH, PERSONAL INJURY, OR PROPERTY DAMAGE CASE. The prejudgment interest rate is equal to the postjudgment interest rate applicable at the time of judgment. Amended by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 62, 7.18(a), eff. Sept. 1, 1999. Cooper & Scully, P.C. 9

Rates of Prejudgment Interest State Courts: 304.003. JUDGMENT INTEREST RATE: INTEREST RATE OR TIME PRICE DIFFERENTIAL NOT IN CONTRACT. (a) A money judgment of a court of this state to which Section 304.002 does not apply, including court costs awarded in the judgment and prejudgment interest, if any, earns postjudgment interest at the rate determined under this section. (b) On the 15th day of each month, the consumer credit commissioner shall determine the postjudgment interest rate to be applied to a money judgment rendered during the succeeding calendar month. Cooper & Scully, P.C. 10

(c) The postjudgment interest rate is: (1) the prime rate as published by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System on the date of computation; (2) five percent a year if the prime rate as published by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System described by Subdivision (1) is less than five percent; or (3) 15 percent a year if the prime rate as published by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System described by Subdivision (1) is more than 15 percent. Cooper & Scully, P.C. 11

Rates of Prejudgment Interest State Courts: 304.004. PUBLICATION OF JUDGMENT INTEREST RATE. The consumer credit commissioner shall send to the secretary of state the postjudgment interest rate for publication, and the secretary shall publish the rate in the Texas Register. Amended by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 62, 7.18(a), eff. Sept. 1, 1999. Cooper & Scully, P.C. 12

Rate of Prejudgment Interest http://www.occc.state.tx.us/pages/int_rates /index.html Cooper & Scully, P.C. 13

Rates of Prejudgment Interest Federal Courts For state law claims, Texas law would control. Gilbane Bldg. Co. v. Empire Steel Erectors, L.P., Civ. No. H-08-1707, 2010 WL 4791493 (Tex. App. S.D. Houston, Nov. 16, 2010). Cooper & Scully, P.C. 14

Accrual of Prejudgment Interest Texas Finance Code 304.104 Accrues on amount of judgment during period beginning on the earlier of the 180 th day after the date D receives written notice of claim or the date suit is filed, and ending on the day preceding the date the judgment is rendered. Computed as simple interest Cooper & Scully, P.C. 15

Accrual of Prejudgment Interest Claim Under 304.104 For purposes of calculating prejudgment interest, claim is a demand for compensation or an assertion of a right to be paid. MCN Energy Enters., Inc. v. Omagro de Colombia, L.D.C.,, 98 S.W.3d 766 (Tex. App. Fort Worth 2003, pet. denied). 180 days after UIM carrier receives written notice of accident. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co. v. Norris, 216 S.W.3d 819 (Tex. 2006). But if tort liability disputed, from date tort liability established by judgment. Henson v. Southern Farm Bureau, 17 S.W.3d 652 (Tex. 2000). Cooper & Scully, P.C. 16

Accrual of Prejudgment Interest Negligence suit: Date original petition filed against company, not date of amended petition naming individual doing business under name of company. Hughes v. Thrash,, 832 S.W.2d 770 (Houston [1 st Dist.] 1992, no writ). Brownsville Pediatric Ass n n v. Reyes,, 68 S.W.3d 184 (Tex. App. Corpus Christi 2002, no writ). Cooper & Scully, P.C. 17

Accrual of Prejudgment Interest Prejudgment interest may not be assessed or recovered on an award of future damages or punitive damages. Tex. Fin. Code 304.1045 Tex. Civ. Prac & Rem. Code 41.007 Exceptions: Tolling Tex. Fin. Code 304.105(a) & (b) Cooper & Scully, P.C. 18

Accrual of Prejudgment Interest Not Recoverable when prohibited by statute or case law. Concord Oil Co. v. Pennzoil Expl.. & Prod. Co.,, 966 S.W.2d 451, 462 (Tex. 1998). Statutory (punitive damages, future damages, DTPA treble damages) Case Law (Attorney s s fees, interpleaded funds, prejudgment interest, or under both statutory and common law) Cooper & Scully, P.C. 19

Tolling Provisions Sec. 304.105. EFFECT OF SETTLEMENT OFFER ON ACCRUAL OF PREJUDGMENT INTEREST. (a) If judgment for a claimant is equal to or less than the amount of a settlement offer of the defendant, prejudgment interest does not accrue on the amount of the judgment during the period that the offer may be accepted. (b) If judgment for a claimant is more than the amount of a settlement offer of the defendant, prejudgment interest does not accrue on the amount of the settlement offer during the period that the offer may be accepted. Amended by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 62, Sec. 7.18(a), eff. Sept. 1, 1999. Cooper & Scully, P.C. 20

Tolling Provisions Sec. 304.106. SETTLEMENT OFFER REQUIREMENTS TO PREVENT PREJUDGMENT INTEREST ACCRUAL. To prevent the accrual of prejudgment interest under this subchapter, a settlement offer must be in writing and delivered to the claimant or the claimant's attorney or representative. Amended by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 62, Sec. 7.18(a), eff. Sept. 1, 1999. Cooper & Scully, P.C. 21

Tolling Provisions Sec. 304.107. VALUE OF SETTLEMENT OFFER FOR COMPUTING PREJUDGMENT INTEREST. If a settlement offer does not provide for cash payment at the time of settlement, the amount of the settlement offer for the purpose of computing prejudgment interest is the cost or fair market value of the settlement offer at the time it is made. Amended by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 62, Sec. 7.18(a), eff. Sept. 1, 1999. Cooper & Scully, P.C. 22

PASSWORD: SCHOOL Cooper & Scully, P.C. 23

Tolling of Prejudgment Interest 1) Offer must be in writing 2) Offer must be delivered to claimant or attorney 3) Offer should be outside mediation 4) Offer should be left open as long as possible 5) Rejection may terminate offer include language that it remains open after it has been rejected Cooper & Scully, P.C. 24

Tolling of Prejudgment Interest JUDGMENT NOT MORE THAN OFFER-If the judgment for the claimant is less than or equal to the amount offered as settlement, prejudgment interest does not accrue at all during the period the offer could be accepted. Cooper & Scully, P.C. 25

Tolling of Prejudgment Interest JUDGMENT MORE THAN OFFER-If the judgment for the claimant is greater than the amount offered as settlement, prejudgment interest accrues only on the portion of the judgment in excess of the settlement offer during the period the offer could be accepted. Cooper & Scully, P.C. 26

Tolling of Prejudgment Interest Tex. Fin. Code 304.108 allowed the courts to toll the accrual of prejudgment interest during periods of delay in trial caused by either party. This section was repealed in 2003; Acts 2003, 78 th Leg., R.S., ch 204, Sec 6.03, eff. Sept. 1, 2003. This discretion is no longer provided to the trial courts. Cooper & Scully, P.C. 27

Calculation of Prejudgment Interest in Judgments Computed as Simple Interest, calculated on principal amount: Amount of damages found by TOF minus any amounts on which prejudgment interest is prohibited by state or case law (exemplary damages, future damages) Rate is the same as post-judgment interest (Tex. Fin. Code 304.103) Cooper & Scully, P.C. 28

Calculation of Prejudgment Interest in Judgments Time of Accrual is Earlier of: (1) 180 th day after D s D s receipt of written notice of claim or (2) Date suit is filed Settlement Credit for settlement must be deducted from the judgment using the declining principal formula. Brainard v. Trinity Univ l Ins. Co.,, 215 S.W.3d 809 (Tex. 2006). Amount deducted according to when settlement made. Cooper & Scully, P.C. 29

Calculation of Prejudgment Interest Settlement in Judgments Before PJI Accrues (Advance Payments) Reduce Past Damages by Settlement Amount and then Add PJI After PJI Accrues Apply first to reduce any PJI interest that has accrued to date of settlement, and then to reduce past damages, and then accrues on past damages remaining from date of settlement to day before date of judgment Cooper & Scully, P.C. 30

Calculation of Prejudgment Interest Tolling in Judgments Standstill Agreements: Could toll accrual of PJI while agreement in effect, unless otherwise contractually provided. Johnson & Higgins, 962 S.W.2d at 531 Settlement Offer: Can Toll while P decides whether to accept D s D s offer Judg offer: No accrual during period could accept Judg > offer: PJI only on portion in excess of settlement offer during period P could accept. Cooper & Scully, P.C. 31

Effect of Reformation of Judgment Court of Appeals Affirms and Orders Reformation of the Judgment PJI Accrual ends on day before date of original judgment. See Cessna Aircraft Co. v. Aircraft Network, LLC, S.W.3d (Tex. App. Dallas May 27, 2011) D.C. Hall Transport, Inc. v. Hard,, 355 S.W.2d 257 (Tex. Civ. App. Fort Worth), writ ref d d n.r.e., 163 Tex. 504, 358 S.W.2d 117 (Tex. 1962) Lewis v. Hill,, 429 S.W.2d 572 (Tex. Civ. App. Tyler 1968, no writ) Cooper & Scully, P.C. 32

Impact of Caps Because PJI Accrues on Amount of Judgment, Damages Must be Capped Before PJI Can Be Computed PJI Included within CPRC 74.301 and 74.303 Damages Limitations? Cooper & Scully, P.C. 33

Coverage for Prejudgment Interest - CGL Supplementary Payments Coverages A and B 1. We will pay with respect to any claim we investigate or settle, or any suit against an insured we defend: * * * f. Prejudgment interest awarded against the insured on that part of the judgment we pay. If we make an offer to pay the applicable limit of insurance, we will not pay any prejudgment interest based on that period of time after the offer. Form CG 00 01 12 04 Cooper & Scully, P.C. 34

Coverage for Prejudgment Interest Personal - Auto Supplementary Payments In addition to our limit of liability, we will pay on behalf of an Insured : * * * 3. Interest accruing after a judgment is entered in any suit we defend. Our duty to pay interest ends when we offer to pay that part of the judgment which does not exceed our limit of liability for this coverage. Form PP 00 01 06 98 Cooper & Scully, P.C. 35

Coverage for Prejudgment Interest Business Auto 2. Coverage Extensions a. Supplementary Payments We will pay for the insured : (6) All interest on the full amount of any judgment that accrues after entry of the judgment in any suit against the insured we defend, but our duty to pay interest ends when we have paid, offered to pay or deposited in court the part of the judgment that is within our Limit of Insurance. Form CA 00 01 03 10 Cooper & Scully, P.C. 36

Coverage for Prejudgment Interest - Homeowners Incidental Liability Coverages * * * 2.Claims and Defense Cost We pay for: * * * e. prejudgment interest awarded against an insured on that part of the judgment we pay. If we offer to pay the limit that applies, we will not apy any prejudgment interest based on that period of time after the offer. Form HO 0003 01 06 Cooper & Scully, P.C. 37

THE END Cooper & Scully, P.C. 38