Virginia Lawyer Register



Similar documents
Virginia Lawyer Register

The Official Publication of the Virginia State Bar

The Official Publication of the Virginia State Bar

The Official Publication of the Virginia State Bar

Virginia Lawyer Register

MISSOURI S LAWYER DISCIPLINE SYSTEM

How To Resolve A Disciplinary Action In Virginia

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. This Court s Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and. Procedure having submitted a Letter Report to the Court

VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISCIPLINARY BOARD MEMORANDUM ORDER

RULES FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINARY ENFORCEMENT OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA LYNCHBURG DIVISION. v. Civil Action Number: 6:09cv9

Definition of the Practice of Law*

BEFORE THE SEVENTH DISTRICT SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. Misc. Docket AG. No. 13. September Term, 2005 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND WILLIAM M.

VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE THIRD DISTRICT COMMITTEE, SECTION III, OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISTRICT COMMITTEE DETERMINATION (PUBLIC REPRIMAND WITH TERMS)

SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN

Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Patricia DuVall Storch, Misc. Docket AG No. 7, September Term, Opinion by Greene, J.

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Saladin Eric Shakir, Misc. Docket AG No. 8, September Term, 2009

Show Me the $$: Trust Accounting and Fee Agreements. Earning Fees is Good... Get the Money Up Front... 10/8/2012

FILED November 9, 2007

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA January 2013 Term. No LAWYER DISCIPLINARY BOARD, Petitioner. JOHN P. SULLIVAN, Respondent

Iowa Unauthorized Practice of Law:

PETER L. OSTERMILLER Attorney at Law Kentucky Home Life Building Eighteenth Floor 239 South Fifth Street Louisville, Kentucky

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS BOARD ON PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY

LAWYER REGULATION. was assessed the costs and expenses of the disciplinary

UNITED STATES TAX COURT WASHINGTON, D.C PRESS RELEASE

Homeline CLE Top Ten Ethical Issue That Impact Family Law Lawyers

FAMILY LAW SECTION, STATE BAR OF NEVADA THE STANDARDS FOR BOARD CERTIFIED SPECIALIZATION IN FAMILY LAW

Rule 42. Practice of attorneys not admitted in Nevada. (1) All actions or proceedings pending before a court in this state;

NO. 14-B-0619 IN RE: DAVID P. BUEHLER ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

Illinois Official Reports

SUBSCRIBER AGREEMENT FOR SECURE REMOTE ACCESS TO THE CIRCUIT COURT RECORDS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

BEFORE THE EVIDENTIARY PANEL FOR STATE BAR DISTRICT NO STATE BAR OF TEXAS JUDGMENT OF DISBARMENT. Parties and Appearance

AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION STANDARDS FOR IMPOSING LAWYER SANCTIONS

A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF MICHIGAN S ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE SYSTEM

SEATTLE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AMERICAN INN OF COURT ETHICS MAY 21, 2015

November Tex. B. J. 960

BEFORE THE LAWYER DISCIPLINARY BOARD STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA STATEMENT OF CHARGES

WHEN A CHILD MAY HAVE A TORT CLAIM: WHAT S THE CHILD S COURT- APPOINTED ATTORNEY TO DO?

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 112,569. In the Matter of LUCAS L. THOMPSON, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

HOUSTON LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICE, INC. RULES OF MEMBERSHIP

In the Matter of Thomas J. Howard, Jr. O R D E R. This matter is before the court pursuant to a petition for reciprocal discipline filed by this

DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Smith Sept. Term 2011, Misc. No. 10

Donald P. Russo, you stand before the Disciplinary Board, your

Nebraska Ethics Advisory Opinion for Lawyers No. 91-3

Attorneys convicted of crimes.

UPL Advisory Opinion (February 2010) Out of State Attorney Practicing Law in the State of Arizona

THE FOLLOWING INFORMAL ADMONITION WAS ISSUED BY BAR COUNSEL ON May 5, In re Harvey A. Kirk, Esquire Bar Docket No

October Tex. B. J. 868

Rule 1A:4. Out-of-State Lawyers When Allowed to Participate in a Case Pro Hac Vice.

Nebraska Ethics Advisory Opinion for Lawyers No

Division of Insurance, Petitioner v. Lisa Sue Mize, Respondent Docket No. E Order on Petitioner's Motion for Summary Decision

requires the legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation.

VIRGINIA BOARD OF BAR EXAMINERS

: : before this court (the Court Annexed Mediation Program ); and

THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMOND RICHMOND - BALTIMORE-CHARLOTTE Post Office Box Richmond,VA Phone

William Austin Watkins, you stand before the Disciplinary Board, your

INDIANA PARALEGAL ASSOCIATION CODE OF ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND RULES FOR ENFORCEMENT

BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 13-BG-52

What to do when a lawyer dies:

UPL ADVISORY OPINION. UPL (April 2005) Tax Payer Representative s Requests

BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT PANEL B CONSENT FINDINGS AND ORDER

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE O R D E R

The Circuit Court. Judges and Clerks. Jurisdiction

INDIGENT DEFENSE (Extracted from the Local Rules of the Superior Court)

Accounting Law and Regulations in Singapore - A Guide

ISBA Professional Conduct Advisory Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN

How to Complain About Lawyers and Judges in New York City

MARYLAND STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR COURT-APPOINTED LAWYERS REPRESENTING CHILDREN IN CUSTODY CASES

Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated October 7, 2013, the Petition for

Inquiry Concerning A Florida Lawyer

SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. Division of Insurance, Petitioner v. Lester Williams, Respondent. Docket No.

Complying with the FCPA- An Exploration of Ethical Issues Raised by Recent Cases Are the Professional Conduct Rules Any Different?

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR STORY COUNTY

Prohibition Against Commingling and Misappropriation of Client Funds or. Property.

Number of Units: Contractor will commence representation in units of indigent defense services.

Comparison of Newly Adopted Rhode Island Rules of Professional Conduct with ABA Model Rules RHODE ISLAND

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee)

Texas Lawyer Discipline - A Summary

02/26/2014 "See News Release 013 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents." SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 14-B-0061 IN RE: KEISHA M.

BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT PANEL B FINDINGS AND ORDER

May Tex. B. J. 442

Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 14-BG-607

KENTUCKY VICTIMS RIGHTS LAWS1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT PLAN

The following rule shall govern the operation of IOLTA accounts and the IOLTA program:

DATE ENGAGEMENT LETTER

CIVIL TRIAL RULES. of the COURTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, TEXAS. Table of Contents GENERAL MATTERS. Rule 1.10 Time Standards for the Disposition of Cases...

On April 15, 2013, the Supreme Court of Texas accepted the resignation,

Transcription:

Virginia Lawyer Register The Official Publication of the Virginia State Bar www.vsb.org In this issue: page 2 Disciplinary Proceedings 3 Disciplinary Summaries Circuit Courts 4 Disciplinary Summaries Circuit Courts Disciplinary Board 5 Disciplinary Summaries Disciplinary Board District Committees 6 Disciplinary Summaries District Committees 7 Notices to Members Approved Opinion Legal Ethics Opinion 1852: Employment Limitations for Suspended or Revoked Lawyers 7 Notices to Members Withdrawn Opinion Legal Ethics Opinion 1553 Communication with Adverse Parties: Parent s Counsel in Custody Dispute Meeting with Minor Child 7 Administrative Suspensions Vol. 58/No. 6 January 2010 7 Nominations Sought for Virginia State Bar Committees 8 February Council Proposal for Public Comment Safekeeping Property and Maintenance of Trust Accounts

DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS Respondent s Name Address of Record Action Effective Date pg Circuit Courts Carl Herman Bundick Accomac, VA Public Reprimand w/terms September 24, 2009 3 Walter Franklin Green, IV Harrisonburg, VA Suspension 7 months December 26, 2010 3 Walter Ware Morrison Virginia Beach, VA Suspension 90 Days October 15, 2009 3 *Andrew Robert Sebok Norfolk, VA Suspension 3 months July 17, 2009 3 George Anthony Yancey Norfolk, VA Public Admonition w/terms September 29, 2009 3 Public Reprimand September 29, 2009 4 Disciplinary Board Steven Scott Biss Petersburg, VA Suspension 30 Days January 1, 2010 4 Anthony Gerome Davis Birmingham, AL Suspension w/terms 8 months October 19, 2009 4 Matthew Bennett Greene United Kingdom Revocation November 10, 2009 5 Anne Marston Lynch Portsmouth, VA Revocation December 4, 2009 5 Daniel Stephen Orci Jr. Washington, DC Revocation October 23, 2009 5 District Committees Susan Page Allen Richmond, VA Public Reprimand October 29, 2009 5 John Wesley Bonney Norfolk, VA Public Reprimand w/terms October 26, 2009 5 Linda Lee Cupit Virginia Beach, VA Public Admonition w/terms October 26, 2009 6 Kelly Ralston Dennis McLean, VA Public Reprimand w/terms November 5, 2009 6 Crystal Anita Gist Fisher Waldorf, MD Public Reprimand w/terms October 22, 2009 6 Vernon Keeve Jr. Fredericksburg, VA Public Reprimand December 1, 2009 6 Suspension Failure to Pay Disciplinary Costs Effective Date Lifted Joseph Kelly Haley III Petersburg, VA November 16, 2009 n/a John Crane King Plano, TX December 2, 2009 n/a Robert E. Miller Newman, GA December 1, 2009 n/a Peter Campbell Sackett Lynchburg, VA November 10, 2009 n/a Bruce Harold Troxell Annandale, VA December 3, 2009 n/a Suspension Failure to Comply with Subpoena Effective Date Lifted Tina Elizabeth Orr Norfolk, VA October 6, 2009 November 6, 2009 n/a Peter Campbell Sackett Lynchburg, VA October 27, 2009 n/a Gary Lance Smith Winchester, VA November 17, 2009 n/a *Respondent has noted an appeal with the Supreme Court of Virginia. **Supreme Court granted stay of suspension pending appeal. ***Respondent withdrew the appeal. Virginia Lawyer Register The Official Publication of the Virginia State Bar Editor: Rodney A. Coggin Assistant Editor: Dawn Chase Design & Production: Madonna G. Dersch The Virginia State Bar publishes the Virginia Lawyer Register five times annually. The Register is primarily a compilation of disciplinary actions against attorneys licensed to practice law in the commonwealth; administrative suspensions; legal ethics opinions; and proposed amendments to the Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia. All documents submitted to the state bar for inclusion in the Register are subject to alteration as to typography and formatting, in order to conform to the requirements of the Register, without changing the intent of any document. Virginia Lawyer (USPS 660-120, ISSN 0899-9473) is published ten times a year in alternating formats by the Virginia State Bar, Eighth & Main Building, 707 East Main Street, Suite 1500, Richmond, Virginia 23219-2800; telephone (804) 775-0500. Subscription Rates: $18.00 per year for nonmembers. This material is presented with the understanding that the publisher and the authors do not render any legal, accounting, or other professional service. It is intended for use by attorneys licensed to practice law in Virginia. Because of the rapidly changing nature of the law, information contained in this publication may become outdated. As a result, an attorney using this material must always research original sources of authority and update information to ensure accuracy when dealing with a specific client s legal matters. In no event will the authors, the reviewers, or the publisher be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages resulting from the use of this material. The views expressed herein are not necessarily those of the Virginia State Bar. Periodical postage paid at Richmond, Virginia, and other offices. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to Virginia State Bar Membership Department Eighth & Main Building 707 East Main Street, Suite 1500 Richmond, Virginia 23219-2800 2 Virginia Lawyer Register January 2010

DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS The following are summaries of disciplinary actions for violations of the Virginia Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC) (Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia, Part 6, II, eff. Jan. 1, 2000) or another of the Supreme Court rules (Rules). References to Part 6, IV, 13 refer to the reformatted Rules effective May 1, 2009, unless otherwise indicated. Copies of complete disciplinary orders are available at the Web link provided with each summary or by contacting the Virginia State Bar Clerk s Office at (804) 775-0539 or clerk@vsb.org. VSB docket numbers are provided. CIRCUIT COURTS CARL HERMAN BUNDICK Accomac, Virginia 09-021-075737 On September 24, 2009, a three-judge panel in the Virginia Beach Circuit Court imposed a public reprimand with terms on Carl Herman Bundick for violating disciplinary rules that govern diligence and communication. The misconduct occurred in his representation in a divorce. RPC 1.3(a); 1.4(a-c) http://www.vsb.org/docs/bundick_12-11-09.pdf found he violated disciplinary rules that govern diligence, communication, declining or terminating representation, and unauthorized practice of law when he filed a pleading on behalf of a client during a time when his license was suspended. RPC 1.3(a); 1.4(b); 1.16(a)(1); 5.5(a)(1) http://www.vsb.org/docs/green_12-21-09.pdf WALTER WARE MORRISON Virginia Beach, Virginia 08-021-072848 Effective October 15, 2009, a three-judge panel in the Virginia Beach Circuit Court suspended Walter Ware Morrison s license to practice law for ninety days for violating professional rules that govern candor toward the tribunal and misconduct that reflects adversely on a lawyer s fitness to practice. The case involved a visitation and custody dispute. RPC 3.3(a)(1), 8.4(c) http://www.vsb.org/docs/morrison_12-08-09.pdf ANDREW ROBERT SEBOK Norfolk, Virginia 08-021-074174 WALTER FRANKLIN GREEN IV Harrisonburg, Virginia 07-070-2248 On November 12, 2009, a three-judge panel in the Rockingham County Circuit Court suspended Walter Franklin Green IV s license to practice law for seven months, to begin December 26, 2010, following an eighteen-month suspension that Mr. Green is currently serving. The court On July 15, 2009, the Supreme Court of Virginia stayed the following suspension pending appeal. Mr. Sebok filed the appeal on December 10, 2009. On June 26, 2009, a three-judge panel in the Norfolk Circuit Court suspended Andrew Robert Sebok s license to practice law for three months, effective July 17, 2009. Mr. Sebok violated disciplinary rules that govern diligence, communication, and declining or terminating representation. The misconduct occurred in his courtappointed representation of a client in a criminal appeal. RPC 1.3(a); 1.4(b); 1.16(d) http://www.vsb.org/docs/sebok_11-12-09.pdf Virginia Lawyer Register January 2010 3

DISCIPLINARY SUMMARIES GEORGE ANTHONY YANCEY Norfolk, Virginia 07-022-0217 On September 29, 2009, a three-judge panel of the Norfolk Circuit Court issued a public admonition with terms to George Anthony Yancey for violating professional rules that govern diligence and termination of representation. The terms require him to replace the transcript he lost in a habeas case. RPC 1.3(a); 1.16(d) Final order: http://www.vsb.org/docs/yancey-final-order_12-08-09.pdf Public admonition: http://www.vsb.org/docs/yancey_public-admon_12-08-09.pdf GEORGE ANTHONY YANCEY Norfolk, Virginia 08-022-073014 On September 29, 2009, a three-judge panel in the Norfolk Circuit Court issued a public reprimand to George Anthony Yancey for violating disciplinary rules that govern competence, diligence, and responsibilities regarding nonlawyer assistants. The misconduct occurred when Mr. Yancey defaulted on an appeal in a court-appointed criminal case. RPC 1.1; 1.3(a); 5.3(a) Final order: http://www.vsb.org/docs/yancey-final_12-08-09.pdf Final memorandum: http://www.vsb.org/docs/yancey-final-memo_12-08-09.pdf Memorandum order: http://www.vsb.org/docs/yancey-memo-order_12-08-09.pdf STEVEN SCOTT BISS Petersburg, Virginia 09-032-078962 DISCIPLINARY BOARD Effective January 1, 2010, the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board imposed a thirty-day suspension of Steven Scott Biss s license to practice law, for violating the professional rule governing misconduct that reflects adversely on the lawyer s fitness to practice. During a previous suspension of his law license, Mr. Biss continued to negotiate with an insurance company on behalf of a client in a personal injury matter. RPC 8.4(c) http://www.vsb.org/docs/biss_11-05-09.pdf ANTHONY GEROME DAVIS Birmingham, Alabama 09-010-076193 On October 19, 2009, the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board suspended Anthony Gerome Davis s license to practice law for eight months with terms. The board found that he violated disciplinary rules that govern diligence, communication, safekeeping property, declining or terminating representation, and bar admission and disciplinary matters. The misconduct occurred in a custody case. This was an agreed disposition of misconduct charges. RPC 1.3(a); 1.14(a); 1.15(a)(1),(2); 1.16(d); 8.1(c) http://www.vsb.org/docs/davis_11-05-09.pdf 4 Virginia Lawyer Register January 2010

DISCIPLINARY SUMMARIES MATTHEW BENNETT GREENE London, United Kingdom 08-041-075456, 08-041-075121 On November 10, 2009, the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board revoked Matthew Bennett Greene s license to practice law. In consenting to the revocation, Mr. Greene acknowledged that he was facing ethics charges in two cases and admitted that the material facts of the charges are true. The cases involved his representations in property investment projects. Rules Part 6, IV, 13-28 http://www.vsb.org/docs/greene_12-11-09.pdf ANNE MARSTON LYNCH Portsmouth, Virginia 10-010-080842 On December 4, 2009, the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board revoked Anne Marston Lynch s license to practice law. In agreeing to the revocation, Ms. Lynch acknowledged that she had been indicted on a felony embezzlement charge in Suffolk Circuit Court and that the facts of the case are true. Rules Part 6, IV, 13-28 http://www.vsb.org/docs/lynch_12-21-09.pdf DANIEL STEPHEN ORCI JR. Washington, D.C. 10-000-081110 On October 23, 2009, the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board revoked Daniel Stephen Orci Jr. s license to practice law in response to his July 2, 2009, disbarment in the District of Columbia by the D.C. Court of Appeals. His Virginia license was summarily suspended on September 25, 2009, pending a board hearing. Rules Part 6, IV, 13-24.A DISTRICT COMMITTEES SUSAN PAGE ALLEN Richmond, Virginia 08-031-075097 On October 29, 2009, a Virginia State Bar Third District-Section I Subcommittee imposed a public reprimand on Susan Page Allen for violating professional rules that govern diligence and conflict of interest: general rule. The misconduct occurred in a real estate case. RPC 1.3(a); 1.7(a)(1),(2),(b)(1-4) http://www.vsb.org/docs/allen-sus_12-08-09.pdf JOHN WESLEY BONNEY Norfolk, Virginia 08-021-074831, 09-021-075690, 09-021-079170 On October 26, 2009, a Virginia State Bar Second District Subcommittee issued a public reprimand with terms to John Wesley Bonney for violating disciplinary rules that govern diligence, fees, declining or terminating representation, firm names and letterheads, and misconduct that reflects adversely on a lawyer s fitness to practice law. The subcommittee ordered Mr. Bonney to refund money to two clients and to vacate a judgment against one of the clients. This was an agreed disposition of misconduct charges. RPC 1.3(a); 1.5(a); 1.16(c),(d); 7.5(a); 8.4(b),(c) http://www.vsb.org/docs/bonney_11-12-09.pdf http://www.vsb.org/docs/orci_11-16-09.pdf Virginia Lawyer Register January 2010 5

DISCIPLINARY SUMMARIES LINDA LEE CUPIT Virginia Beach, Virginia 09-022-078836 CRYSTAL ANITA GIST FISHER Waldorf, Maryland 08-042-073471 and 09-042-075770 On October 26, 2009, a Virginia State Bar Second District Subcommittee imposed a public admonition with terms on Linda Lee Cupit for violating professional rules that govern safekeeping property and for not performing required reconciliations of her escrow account. This was an agreed disposition of misconduct charges. 1.15(a)(1),(2), (e)(1)(i-v), (f)(4)(i),(ii),(5)(i-iii) On October 22, 2009, a Virginia State Bar Fourth District-Section II Subcommittee issued a public reprimand with terms to Crystal Anita Gist Fisher for violating disciplinary rules that govern diligence and communication. The misconduct occurred in two employment discrimination matters. This was an agreed disposition of misconduct charges. RPC 1.3(a), 1.4(a) http://www.vsb.org/docs/cupit_12-08-09.pdf http://www.vsb.org/docs/fisher_11-12-09.pdf KELLY RALSTON DENNIS McLean, Virginia 08-051-072652 On November 5, 2009, a Virginia State Bar Fifth District-Section I Subcommittee issued a public reprimand with terms on Kelly Ralston Dennis for violating disciplinary rules that govern competence, diligence, communication, and conflict of interest: general rule. The violations occurred during representation in matters involving creditors collection efforts against Mr. Dennis s client. This was an agreed disposition of misconduct charges. VERNON KEEVE JR. Fredericksburg, Virginia 05-060-3437 On December 1, 2009, a Virginia State Bar Sixth District subcommittee issued a public reprimand to Vernon Keeve Jr. for violating disciplinary rules that govern diligence, communication, safekeeping property, declining or terminating representation, and fairness to opposing party and counsel. The misconduct occurred during his representation of a client in a personal injury case. This was an agreed disposition of ethics charges. RPC 1.3(a); 1.4(a),(c); 1.15(c)(4); 1.16(a)(2); 3.4(a),(d) http://www.vsb.org/docs/dennis_12-11-09.pdf http://www.vsb.org/docs/keeve_12-11-09.pdf 6 Virginia Lawyer Register January 2010

NOTICES TO MEMBERS LEGAL ETHICS OPINIONS APPROVED OPINION LEO 1852 EMPLOYMENT LIMITATIONS FOR SUSPENDED OR REVOKED LAWYERS Effective: On December 9, 2009, the Standing Committee on Legal Ethics approved the advisory Legal Ethics Opinion 1852. Details: http://www.vacle.org/opinions/1852.htm WITHDRAWN OPINION LEO 1553 ADMINISTRATIVE SUSPENSIONS As required by the Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia Part Six, Section IV, Paragraph 19, the Virginia State Bar has posted a list of members who were administratively suspended on October 9, 2009, for failure to comply with Paragraphs 11 and 16, 18, or 19 of the Rules of Court or Sections 54.1-3912 or 54.1-3913.1 of the Code of Virginia. These attorneys were notified of their suspensions at their current addresses of record with the Virginia State Bar; however, in some instances, this has not been effective. To assist the VSB in re-establishing contact with these attorneys, anyone with knowledge of the present location and practice status of persons on this list should contact the Membership Department at (804) 775-0530 or membership@vsb.org. This list was last updated on December 4, 2009. Details: http://www.vsb.org/site/members/administrative-suspensions/ COMMUNICATION WITH ADVERSE PARTIES: PARENT S COUNSEL IN CUSTODY DISPUTE MEETING WITH MINOR CHILD On December 9, 2009, the Virginia State Bar Standing Committee on Legal Ethics withdrew Legal Ethics Opinion 1553 (October 20, 1993), which opines that there is no improper ex parte communication because the child (represented by a lawyer or guardian ad litem) was not a party in the custody proceeding. The committee withdrew the opinion because it was based on Disciplinary Rule 7-103, which predates current Rules of Professional Conduct 4.2. Rule 4.2, adopted in 2000, prohibits communications with persons represented by counsel and not merely parties. * * NOMINATIONS SOUGHT FOR VSB COMMITTEES PRESIDENT-ELECT BLANK SEEKS COMMITTEE MEMBERS FOR TERMS STARTING JULY 2010 Virginia State Bar President-elect Irving M. Blank invites Virginia lawyers to volunteer for committees essential to the self-regulation of the legal profession. Appointments generally will be for three-year terms that run from July 1, 2010, to June 30, 2013. If you want to be considered for an appointment, fill out the form at the link below and send it to the bar at 775-0501 (fax) or breeden@vsb.org by March 9, 2010. Persons of diversity are encouraged to apply. Form: http://www.vsb.org/docs/cmte_form.pdf Virginia Lawyer Register January 2010 7

PROPOSAL FOR PUBLIC COMMENT FEBRUARY COUNCIL PROPOSAL The Virginia State Bar seeks public comment on the following proposal, which will be considered at the VSB Council meeting on February 27, 2010, in Richmond. Comments should be sent in writing to Karen A. Gould, Executive Director, Virginia State Bar, 707 East Main Street, Suite 1500, Richmond, VA 23219, no later than end of business on the date of deadline. SAFEKEEPING PROPERTY AND MAINTENANCE OF TRUST ACCOUNTS Deadline for comment: February 8, 2010 The Standing Committee on Legal Ethics proposes an amendment to Rule 1.15, Safekeeping Property, that eliminates redundancy in the rule and clarifies the rule s record-keeping requirements for Virginia lawyers. In addition, the committee proposes modifications to Paragraph 20 that include elimination of the regulations for the approval of financial institutions as a depository for attorney trust accounts in Virginia. Specifically, the committee proposes restructuring Rule 1.15 to: 1. combine the requirements as they apply to lawyers and fiduciaries; 2. eliminate the terms used to refer to certain records and replace them with specific descriptions of the type of records that need to be maintained; 3. eliminate the rule s redundant definitions; 4. eliminate detailed requirements from the rule that were specifically applicable to financial institutions, as that information is included in the Virginia State Bar Approved Financial Institution Agreement; 5. add a specific requirement to the rule that a lawyer cannot disburse funds or use property of a client or third party without the client s consent or convert or misappropriate funds or property of a client or third party, except as directed by a tribunal; 6. add language to Comment [6] that gives additional guidance to lawyers using electronic banking transactions; 7. add specific language requiring a lawyer to hold funds in escrow when a third party has made a claim against those funds; and 8. add titles to subparagraphs for simplicity and clarity. The amendments to Paragraph 20 would accomplish the following: 1. define a financial institution approved by the Virginia State Bar; 2. clarify the different types of trust accounts that can be opened, as well as create an opt-out provision; and 3. outline the specific requirements that financial institutions must follow as Virginia State Bar approved financial institutions. This amended Paragraph 20 would incorporate a new Virginia State Bar Approved Financial Agreement that all financial institutions must execute in order to be approved by the Virginia State Bar. The agreement would be incorporated by reference as an appendix to the rule. (Amendments to Rules of Professional Conduct 1.15 and Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia Part 6, IV, 20) Details: http://www.vsb.org/docs/rule1-15_12-9-09.pdf and http://www.vsb.org/docs/para20_appa_12-9-09.pdf For easier access to the documents cited in this magazine, the Virginia Lawyer Register is posted with live Internet links at http://www.vsb.org/docs/valawyermagazine/register_2010-01.pdf 8 Virginia Lawyer Register January 2010