l. This is an action for a declaratory judgment and to challenge the removal of a



Similar documents
3. Collector is sued herein in his official capacity and is a necessary party to. CiVL DIVISION

2. The Court has jurisdiction pursuant to Chapter 194, Florida Statutes, and Article V,

1., This is an action for declaratory reiief conccrniirg certain ad rralorem real. Iriling NN E-Filed 081 todal 09:27:19 AM

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 9 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

1. This is an action to contest the decision of the Lee County Value. 2. At all times material herein, the Property Appraiser was the duly elected

1. The Plaintiffs, FS ORLANDO II LLC and FS ORLANDO GOLF LLC -1- COMPLAINT

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff [PLAINTIFF] hereby sues the Defendants, [DEFENDANT #1], [DEFENDANT INTRODUCTION

How To Get A Court Order To Stop A Flat Fee From Being Charged In Florida

AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION COMPLAINT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. v. CASE NO. COMPLAINT

61.14 Enforcement and modification of support, maintenance, or alimony agreements or orders.--

COMPLAINT. sues Defendants Eastern Florida State College and Dr. Janies H. Richey and says:

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions. hb

Case 9:15-cv JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/19/2015 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.

SIXTH CIVIL DIVISION COMPLAINT: by and PRO SE, Hereby sues the Defendant and alleges:

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 7 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA COMPLAINT FOR DISABILITY INSURANCE BENEFITS

Notice of Class Action Settlement

vs. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff JAMES SCHAIRER, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby sues

Case 5:06-cv XR Document 20 Filed 09/28/06 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

MAINE REVENUE SERVICES PROPERTY TAX DIVISION PROPERTY TAX BULLETIN NO. 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

CASE NO.: COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, [PLAINTIFF S NAME], by and through her parent and natural guardian

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DEFENDANT S ANSWER

CASE NO.: C O M P L A I N T. Defendant, HARBOR HOUSE OF CENTRAL FLORIDA, INC., f/k/a Spouse Abuse, Inc., a/k/a

Authority for the County Attorney to Initiate Litigation in the Case of Pinellas County v. Verizon Florida, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA BROWARD DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No.: COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DISABILITY INSURANCE BENEFITS

SUPPLEMENTAL FINAL JUDGMENT MODIFYING PARENTAL RESPONSIBILILTY, VISITATION, OR PARENTING PLAN/TIME-SHARING SCHEDULE AND OTHER RELIEF

COUNTERCLAIM AGAINST PLAINTIFF ECOSMART, LLC AND THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT AGAINST CARLOS ANTONIO CABRERA

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Please see Section IX. for Additional Information:

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA. Order Number Civ

COMPLAINT PARTIES. 2. COGA promotes the expansion of oil and gas supplies, markets, and transportation infrastructure.

Case 3:09-cv MMH-JRK Document 33 Filed 08/10/10 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 05/28/14 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Plaintiffs, Defendants. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff, Rebecca Weston, hereby accepts the Offer of

How To File A Lawsuit Against A Corporation In California

WRITTEN TESTIMONY OF BRYAN C. SKARLATOS, ESQ. given it powers to collect money and property that far exceed those of any ordinary creditor.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT I.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF MONTEREY. No.

STATE OF ALABAMA ALABAMA LAW INSTITUTE

Attorneys for Maricopa County Community College District Board IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA

Case 3:15-cv LAB-BLM Document 1 Filed 03/16/15 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CASE NO.: CIVIL DIVISION COMPLAINT. through undersigned counsel, and hereby sues Defendant, Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., a Florida GENERAL ALLEGATIONS

Case 2:10-cv JCM-LRL Document 1 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 8

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT CHANCERY DIVISION

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL CIVIL DIVISION

Case 1:15-cv KMW Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/28/2016 Page 1 of 8 UNTIED STATE DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MARC D. LAVIK, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : C.A. No. PC 11- : DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES, : DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, : STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, : COMPLAINT

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 87

This test letter is NOT to be sent to a taxpayer. This text does not appear on production letters.

Case 3:14-cv HU Document 1 Filed 04/23/14 Page 1 of 12 Page ID#: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Case 5:11-cv SWW Document 4 Filed 08/18/11 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 03/11/15 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OFMICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, v. Case No. Hon. Magistrate Judge UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA

Supreme Court of Florida

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION COMPLAINT. COMES NOW, the Plaintiff, JOSEPH DELFRATE, and sues the Defendant,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

- "'. --, ,-~ ') " UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Federal Trade Commission,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 05/03/16 Page 1 of 8

Case No.: CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR BREACH OF IMPLIED WARRANTY OF WORKMANSHIP AND HABITABILITY. Plaintiffs,

Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION. MARIA GODINEZ, an individual,

Case 4:05-cv GTE Document 25 Filed 12/08/2005 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS LITTLE ROCK DIVISION

FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION AND COLLECTIVE COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

State of New Hampshire Banking Department ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: NOTICE OF ORDER

How to Write a Complaint

Case Doc 40 Filed 03/31/16 Entered 03/31/16 13:02:57 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION. Case No. 2:12-cv-45-FtM-29SPC OPINION AND ORDER

Part VIII RULES GOVERNING PRACTICE IN THE TAX COURT OF NEW JERSEY TABLE OF CONTENTS

Complaint - Walmart Substance on Floor in Frozen Food Dept.

UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

BERMAN, KEAN & RIGUERA, P.A W. Commercial Boulevard, Suite 2800, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida Tel. (954)

4:14-cv PMD Date Filed 06/10/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10

Case Number XXX I. INTRODUCTION. 1. Defendants E.G.O. and E.R.O., prepare immigration documents for customers for a

OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS,

TERRENCE and Marie Domin, Plaintiffs, v. SHELBY INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Defendant.

The State of New Jersey, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection

Plaintiff Carol Parker ( Plaintiff ), residing at 32 Coleman Way, Jackson, NJ 08527, by her undersigned counsel, alleges the following upon personal

COMPLAINT. Now come Plaintiffs, personal care attendants, consumers, surrogates,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

RULES OF THE TAX APPEAL COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Transcription:

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA WALTER PALASZ AND LYNN PALASZ. Plaintiffs, LORI PARRISH, as Property Appraiser of Broward County, Florida, THOMAS KENNEDY, as Tax Collector of Broward County, Florida,and MARSHALL STRANBURG, as Executive Director of the Florida Department of Revenue, Defendants. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF Plaintiffs. Walter Palasz and Lynn Palasz, sue Defendants, Lori Parrish, as Property Appraiser of Broward County, Florida ("Appraiser"), Thomas Kennedy, as Tax Collector of Broward County, Florida ("Co11ector"), and Marshall Stranburg. as Executive Director of the Florida Department of Revenue ("Department"), and allege: l. This is an action for a declaratory judgment and to challenge the removal of a homestead exemption on property in Broward County, Florida and the imposition of a tax lien. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to Chapter 194, Florida Statutes, article V, sections 5 and 20 of the Florida Constitution, and section 86.011, Florida Statutes. 2. Plaintiffs, Walter Palasz and Lynn Palasz, are the owlers of certain real property located at I 03 NE l gth Ave. #246 in Deerfield Beach, Florida and identified as Parcel No. 8305- AE-974 f"subject Property"], which is classified and assessed as owner-occupied residential property.

3. Appraiser is sued herein in her official capacity and is a necessary party to the action pursuant to section 194.181(2), Florida Statutes. 4. Collector is sued herein in his official capacity and is a necessary party to the action pursuant to section 194.181(3), Florida Statutes. 5. Defendant Marshall Stranburg is sued herein in his official capacity and is a necessily party to the action pursuant to section 194. 1 8 1 (5), Florida Statutes. 6. From 2001 to and including January 7,2075,the Plaintiffs owned the Subject Property and made it their permanent residence. Count l: Removal of Tax Lien 7. The Plaintiffs reallege and incorporate by reference paragraphs I -6 of this Complaint as though fully set forth herein. 8. The Plaintiffs applied for and received a homestead exemption on the Subject Property in the 2002 tax year. They continued to receive the homestead exemption on the property through the 2013 tax year. 9. On June 26, 2014, Appraiser sent the Plaintiff a Notice of Intent to File Lien ["Lien Notice"] notifying them that the homestead exemption on the Subject Property would be retroactively removed for the 2Q06-2013 tax years. A copy of the Lien Notice is attached as Exhibit 'oa" and incorporated herein. The Lien Notice stated that the reason for the removal of the homestead exemption was "Not Owner's Primary Residence." 10. The Property Appraiser recorded a tax lien against the Subject Property on August 11,2014. A copy of the Notice of Lien is attached as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein,

I 1. Section 196.161, Florida Statutes allows the Property Appraiser to file a tax lien against property of a taxpayer who was granted a homestead exemption to which they were not entitled for any year or years within the prior 10 years. 12. However, the Plaintiffs were entitled to the homestead exemption on the Subject Property in the 2006-2013 tax years, pursuant to article VII, section 6 of the Florida Constitution and section 196.031, Florida Statutes. Thus, the Property Appraiser's retroactive removal of the homestead exemption and imposition of a tax lien was unlawful. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs demand that this Court enter an order reinstating the 2006 through 2013 homestead exemptions on the subject property; cancelling the tax lien; awarding Plaintiffs their costs incurred in bringing this action pursuant to section 194.192, Florida Statutes; and awarding such other general relief as may be just and equitable. Count 2: Reinstatement of 2014 Homestead Exemption 13. The Plaintiffs re-ailege and incorporate by reference paragraphs 1-6 of this Complaint as though fully set forth herein. 14. On June 13,2014, Appraiser sent the Plaintiff anotice of Denial of Ad Valorem Property Tax Exemption ["2014 Notice of Denial"] notifying them that the homestead exemption on the Subject Property would be denied for the 2074tax year. A copy of the Notice is attached as Exhibit "C" and incorporated herein. The Notice stated that the reason for the denial of the homestead exemption was "[o]wners' primary residence is in Massachusetts." 15. Plaintiffs have paid the 2014 taxes on the Subject Property in full, pursuant to section 194.171(3)(4), Florida Statutes. A copy of the receipt for payment of the 2014 taxes is attached as Exhibit "D."

16. Plaintiffs have performed all conditions precedent which are required to be performed by Plaintiff in establishing their right to bring this action. Specifically, this action has been filed within the time period prescribed by section 196.1 5 1, Florida Statutes. 17. The notice of denial of the 2014 homestead exemption for the Subject Property did not meet the specificity requirements of section 196.193(5), Florida Statutes. Thus, the notice was invalid and ineffective to remove the 2014 homestead exemption. 18. Moreover, the Plaintiffs were entitled to the homestead exemption on the Subject Property in 2014, pursuant to article VII, section 6 of the Florida Constitution and section 196.031, Florida Statutes, and thus the Appraiser's denial of the homestead exemption was unlaufirl. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs demand that this Court enter an order reinstating the 2014 homestead exemption on the Subject Property, ordering the Collector to cancel the original tax bill, issue new tax bills that reflect the2014 homestead exemption, and to refund any overpayments; awarding Plaintiffs their costs incurred in bringing this action pursuant to section lg4.lgz,florida Statutes; and awarding such other general relief as may be just and equitable. Count 3: Reinstatementof 2.0l5-ll"qn$egteadBxgmnt&ut- 19. Plaintiffs re-allege and incorporate by reference paragraphs 1-6 of this Complaint as though fully set forth herein. tax year. 20. The Plaintiffs filed a timely application for a homestead exemption for the 2015 21. On June 1.,2015, Appraiser sent the Plaintiff a Notice of Disapproval of Application for Property Tax Exemption ["2015 Notice of Denial"] notiffing them that their

application for a homestead exemption on the Subject Property would be denied for the 2015 tax year. A copy of the Notice is attached as Exhibit "E" and incorporated herein. 22. At the time this case was filed, the 2015 taxes on the Subject Property were not yet due and owing. Thus, the Plaintiffs were not required by section 194.171Q), Florida Statutes to pay any taxes for the 2015 tax year prior to the filing of this action. 23. Plaintiffs have performed all conditions precedent which are required to be performed by Plaintiffs in establishing their right to bring this action. Specifically, this action has been flled within the time period prescribed by section 194.171Q), Florida Statutes. 24. The Plaintiffs were entitled to the homestead exemption on the Subject Property in 2015, pursuant to article VII, section 6 of the Florida Constitution and section 196.031, Florida Statutes, and thus the Appraiser's denial of the homestead exemption was unlawful. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs demand that this Court enter an order reinstating the 2015 homestead exemption on the Subject Property, ordering the Collector to issue tax bills that reflect the 2015 homestead exemption, and to refund any overpayments; awarding Plaintiffs their costs incurred in bringing this action pursuant to section 194.192, Florida Statutes; and awarding such other general relief as may be just and equitable. e JoHNSoN LEGAL of FLoRIDA, P.L. 5602 Marquesas Cir. Suite 208 P.O. Box 20998 Sarasota, FL 34276 (e41) e26-fiss Fax: (941) 926-1160 sj ohnson@johnsqnle galfl.com Attomey for Plaintiffs Walter and Lynn Palasz L. JOHNSON Florida Bar No. 0134775