defendant, Symphony Diagnostic Services, Inc. (doing business as MobilexUSA) ("Mobilex"),



Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA COMPLAINT

1. This is a civil action brought pursuant to the Uniformed Services Employment and. Reemployment Rights Act of 1994, 38 U.S.C ( USERRA ).

Case 2:15-cv CW Document 2 Filed 05/12/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA NORFOLK DIVISION 2Dub APR - 3 PI: 41 COMPLAINT

No. Plaintiff Kelvin Bledsoe ( Plaintiff ), by his undersigned counsel, brings claims

Case 1:14-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 05/13/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Broadband Graphics - infringement of Patent Law and Procedure

Case l:ll-cv yk Document 15 Filed 07/19/12 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : ORDER

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 9 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case 3:15-cv LAB-BLM Document 1 Filed 03/16/15 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 9:15-cv JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/19/2015 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.

Case 5:08-cv FL Document 1 Filed 11/14/2008 Page 1 of 6

Plaintiff Carol Parker ( Plaintiff ), residing at 32 Coleman Way, Jackson, NJ 08527, by her undersigned counsel, alleges the following upon personal

Case 3:10-cv JAP -DEA Document 1 Filed 08/11/10 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1

Case 6:13 cv Document 1 Filed 10/03/13 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION COMPLAINT. Plaintiff United States of America ( United States"), alleges:

Case 3:13-cv JBA Document 1 Filed 11/14/13 Page 1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case 2:10-cv JCM-LRL Document 1 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Plaintiff, : X. Nature of the Action. 1. This is an action for breach of a settlement agreement, retaliation

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA HARRISONBURG DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 7 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA COMPLAINT FOR DISABILITY INSURANCE BENEFITS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION

Case4:13-cv DMR Document1 Filed12/11/13 Page1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORIGIA-~~T ~:J,-~T,>cURT SAVANNAH DIVISION j Ga. NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 1:10-cv WGY Document 1 Filed 03/23/10 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case 3:14-cv M Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1

Case 3:14-cv RNC Document 1 Filed 11/14/14 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Case 1:13-cv Doc #1 Filed 09/30/13 Page 1 of 8 Page ID#1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AMENDED COMPLAINT I. INTRODUCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION. v. Case No. COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DEFENDANT S ANSWER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

Case 1:11-cv AKH Document 1 Filed 07/01/11 Page 1 of 8 SPRINT UNITED MANAGEMENT COMPANY, Plaintiff, Defendant.

Case Doc 40 Filed 03/31/16 Entered 03/31/16 13:02:57 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case3:15-cv JCS Document1 Filed09/01/15 Page1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case4:15-cv DMR Document1 Filed09/16/15 Page1 of 11

Case 3:15-cv MLC-LHG Document 1 Filed 11/17/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 2:13-cv JS-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/26/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No.

4:14-cv PMD Date Filed 06/10/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10

FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION AND COLLECTIVE COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 05/19/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII. Case No.: CV-06-00~CK-LEK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed 05/24/10 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 3:14-cv AC Document 10 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 43

Case 4:14-cv A Document 1 Filed 04/10/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 05/28/14 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 06/02/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:13-cv CMA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/11/2013 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

In the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Atlanta Division

Case 5:14-cv Document 1 Filed 07/11/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Case 3:15-cv Document 1 Filed 10/28/15 Page 1 of 13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION DEFENDANT S COUNTERCLAIM

UNITEDSTATESDISTRlCTCOURT ~ EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RlCHMOND DIVISION COMPLAINT

Notice of Collective Action and Opportunity to Join

4:15-cv RBH Date Filed 01/29/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10

CIVIL DICTRICT COURT PARISH OF ORLEANS STATE OF LOUISIANA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:15-cv RP Document 1 Filed 11/16/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 1:12-cv BEL Document 1 Filed 02/15/12 Page 1 of 6. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (Northern Division)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (Southern Division) v. * Civil Action No.: * * * * ooo0ooo * * * * COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DISABILITY INSURANCE BENEFITS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

How to Write a Complaint

Transcription:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA FRANTZ JULIEN, 09 1 Plaintiff, Civil Action No. v. SYMPHONY DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES, INC. (d/b/a MobilexUSA), JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant. COMPLAINT Plaintiff, Frantz Julien ("Julien"), by the undersigned attorneys, makes the following averments: 1. This civil action is brought pursuant to the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994,38 U.S.C. 4301-4335 ("USERRA"). JURISDICTION AND VENUE 2. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 4323(b). 3. Venue is proper in this judicial district under 38 U.S.C. 4323(c)(2) because defendant, Symphony Diagnostic Services, Inc. (doing business as MobilexUSA) ("Mobilex"), exercises authority, is located in and does business within this judicial district. Additionally, the Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1391(b) because events giving rise to this lawsuit occurred in this judicial district.

-2- PARTIES 4. Julien resides in Irvington, Essex County, New Jersey. 5. Mobilex is a Maryland Corporation, with, among other locations, offices in Horsham, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, located within the jurisdiction of this Court and is an employer within the meaning of 38 U.S.C. 4303(4)(A). CLAIMS FOR RELIEF 6. In November 1988, Julien joined the New York Army National Guard ("National Guard") and continues to serve in the National Guard. 7. On April 20,2000, Julien began working as a Staff Mobile Radiologic Technologist for Mobilex. 8. In January 2003, the National Guard notified Julien that his unit would be activated for service in March 2003 with the United States Army ("Army"). Julien immediately notified his supervisor at Mobilex, Scott Kearns, and a Mobilex human resources department employee, Marcia Bothel, of his impending military activation. 9. On or about March 3,2003, Julien received a written copy of his National Guard orders ("orders"), stating that his active duty began on March 3,2003. Shortly thereafter, he provided a copy of his orders to Mobilex. 10. In 2003, after Julien began his active military service, Kearns contacted Julien and requested that Julien attend a meeting at Mobilex. Julien told Kearns that, due to his military duties, he (Julien) could not attend the meeting. Julien faxed a copy of his orders to Mobilex. 11. Shortly thereafter, Mobilex sent Julien a letter terminating Julien's employment with Mobilex.

-3-12. Julien gave Mobilex's employment termination letter to a military Judge Advocate, who contacted Kearns to discuss the matter. Keams later called Julien and told Julien that the Judge Advocate had cleared up the matter. Julien told Kearns that, when Julien was discharged from the Army, he would return to Mobilex with his military discharge papers. 13. On February 28,2007, Julien completed his military duty with the Army and received an honorable discharge. 14. In mid-march 2007 and on April 9,2007, Julien applied for reemployment with Mobilex but was told that Mobilex had no positions available. 15. On February 8,2008, Julien filed a complaint under USERRA with the U.S. Department of Labor ("Department of Labor"). 16. The Department of Labor's Veterans' Employment and Training Service ("VETS") conducted an investigation of Julien's complaint. 17. In April 2008, during the course of the VETS investigation, Mobilex offered Julien reemployment. 18. On April 28,2008, Julien began his reemployment with Mobilex at a rate of approximately $21.00 per hour. 19. Upon information and belief, Mobilex pays new, entry-level Staff Mobile Radiologic Technologists at a rate of approximately $22.00 to $23.00 per hour. 20. Upon information and belief, Mobilex pays Staff Mobile Radiologic Technologists who began employment with Mobilex in or around the year 2000 (the year in which Julien began employment with Mobilex) in excess of $24.00 per hour.

-4-21. Mobilex violated Sections 4312 and 4313 of USERRA by, inter alia, failing to promptly reemploy Julien upon his return from active service to either the position he would have held had his employment not been interrupted by his military service, or a position of like seniority, status and pay. 22. Mobilex's violations of USERRA were willful. 23. Because of Mobilex's conduct, Julien suffered monetary damages, including lost wages and benefits, in an amount to be proven at trial. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Julien prays that the Court enter judgment against Mobilex and, further, that the Court: 24. Declare that Mobilex's refusal to reemploy Julien promptly was a violation of Section 4312 of USERRA; 25. Declare that Mobilex's reemployment of Julien at a lower wage and benefits than the wage and benefits he would have received had he been continuously employed by Mobilex and had not served in the Army, was a violation of Section 4313 of USERRA; 26. Require that Mobilex comply with the provisions of USERRA by offering to employ Julien in a position of like pay, status and benefits to the position he would have had if he had been continuously employed by Mobilex and had not served in the Army; 27. Require that Mobilex fully comply with the provisions of USERRA by paying Julien all amounts due to him for his loss of wages, lost benefits and lost opportunities caused by Mobilex's failure or refusal to comply with the provisions of USERRA; 28. Declare that Mobilex's violations of USERRA were willful;

-5-29. Order that Mobilex pay Julien as liquidated damages an amount equal to the amount of his lost compensation and other benefits suffered by reason of Mobilex's willftil violations of USERRA; 30. Enjoin Mobilex from taking any action against Julien that fails to comply with the provisions of USERRA; 31. Award Julien prejudgment interest on the amount of lost wages and benefits found due; and 32. Grant such other and further relief as may be just and proper. JURY DEMAND 33. Julien hereby demands a trial by jury of all issues so triable.

-6- LORETTA KING Acting Assistant Attorney General Civil Rights Division BY: M. GADZfCHOWSKI arno. 1014294) LOUIS LOPEZ I (DC Bar No. 461662) Deputy Chief JOSEPH J. SPERBERIV (NY Bar No. 2662526) Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division Employment Litigation Section 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Patrick Henry Building, Room 4914 Washington, DC 20530 Telephone: (202)514-8138 Facsimile: (202)514-1005 E-mail: joseph.sperber@usdoj.gov Attorneys for Plaintiff