CLASSROOM ENVIRONMENT Indicator Description Indicators of Success



Similar documents
Professional Development Needs Assessment for Teachers

Section Two: Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession

APPENDIX A: Examples of Observations and Documentation

TOOL KIT for RESIDENT EDUCATOR and MENT OR MOVES

The Art and Science of Teaching the Common Core State Standards

Arkansas Teaching Standards

Teacher Evaluation. Missouri s Educator Evaluation System

Teacher Rubric with Suggested Teacher and Student Look-fors

NC TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS SAMPLE EVIDENCES AND ARTIFACTS

Section III. An Excellent Christian Teacher. Characteristics and Expectations. GRCS Handbook 1

Correlation Map of LEARNING-FOCUSED to Marzano s Evaluation Model

Research Base and Validation Studies on the Marzano Evaluation Model, April Research Base and Validation Studies on the Marzano Evaluation Model

Marzano Center Non-Classroom Instructional Support Member Evaluation Form

CALIFORNIA S TEACHING PERFORMANCE EXPECTATIONS (TPE)

The Best Selling edi Books

New Jersey Professional Standards for Teachers Alignment with InTASC NJAC 6A:9C-3.3 (effective May 5, 2014)

Special Education Teacher Evaluation Rubric

Vernon Park Primary School. Teaching and Learning Policy

I. Students succeed because teachers plan with individual learning results in mind.

North Carolina TEACHER. evaluation process. Public Schools of North Carolina State Board of Education Department of Public Instruction

Rodel Exemplary Teacher Initiative

A Study of Best Practices in PLATO Learning Online Solutions

TLE Observation and Evaluation Rubric Teachers

Teacher Evaluation Model

Talent Development Secondary Assessment, Curriculum, and Instruction Blueprint Practices to Support a Culture of Success

Using Rounds to Enhance Teacher Interaction and Self Reflection: The Marzano Observational Protocol

CLASSROOM OBSERVATION REPORT. Levels of Performance

NW COLORADO BOCES ALTERNATIVE LICENSURE PROGRAM

Framework for Teaching Possible Evidence List

Professional Development Electronic Plan for Teachers

Joseph L. McCourt Middle School Cumberland, RI Servicing students in grades 6 8

Indiana Wesleyan University Differentiated Lesson Plan Physical Education 2008 NASPE Standards

CCSD CLASS KEYS CLASSROOM TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM PERFORMANCE RUBRIC WITH EXAMPLES OF TEACHER EVIDENCE

DOMAIN 1 FOR READING SPECIALIST: PLANNING AND PREPARATION LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE COMPONENT UNSATISFACTORY NEEDS IMPROVEMENT PROFICIENT EXCELLENT

Differentiation for Science

Mississippi Statewide Teacher Appraisal Rubric M-STAR

FRAMEWORK FOR EFFECTIVE TEACHING. Newark Public Schools Teacher Performance Evaluation

TEAM PLANNING AND REPORTING

Similar Triangles Grade Seven

An Effective CSTP Classroom

Principal Practice Observation Tool

19K660. Brooklyn, NY Jocelyn Badette

ILLINOIS CERTIFICATION TESTING SYSTEM

Leadership Through Strategic Discussions Between Supervising Administrator and Principals

Standards of Quality and Effectiveness for Professional Teacher Preparation Programs APPENDIX A

Pre-service Performance Assessment Professional Standards for Teachers: See 603 CMR 7.08

Autism Spectrum Disorder Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria Rubric

CURRICULUM MAP. Elementary and Early Childhood Program: Alignment of Student Learning Outcomes, Standards, and Assessments

Silicon Valley Mathematics Initiative Student Focused Math Content Coaching

Communication Process

Classroom Teacher, Prekindergarten Teacher & Student Support Teacher

Greenville City Schools. Teacher Evaluation Tool

What s My Point? - Grade Six

Games and Activities that Build Academic Vocabulary

PRO-NET. A Publication of Building Professional Development Partnerships for Adult Educators Project. February 1999

Delaware Performance Appraisal System

Standard Two: Knowledge of Mathematics: The teacher shall be knowledgeable about mathematics and mathematics instruction.

Illinois Professional Teaching Standards

Muhammad Ali Presents Go the Distance! Aligns to Title I, Part A. June

Tennessee Educator Acceleration Model (TEAM) TEAM Evaluation Supplemental Materials 2014

QUALITIES OF EFFECTIVE TEACHERS James Stronge

The Premier On-Demand Professional Learning Video Platform for Educators

TExES Pedagogy and Professional Responsibilities (PPR) EC 12 (160) Test at a Glance

Annotated Bibliography

Best Practices for Online Courses. 100 Quality Indicators for Online Course Design

Submitted for Review and Approval Florida Department of Education 5/1/2012

Business Analyst Position Description

Section Three: Ohio Standards for Principals

Chapter 6: Hiring and placing coaches

CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT CURRICULUM &PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT DIVISION

TLE Observation and Evaluation Rubric Teachers

TEXAS RISING STAR WEBINAR SERIES: CURRICULUM AND EARLY LEARNING GUIDELINES RECORDED OCTOBER 29, 2015 NOTES

1-to-1 Classroom Routines and Instructional Routines

2013 Marzano School Leader Evaluation Model Rubric

ELL Considerations for Common Core-Aligned Tasks in English Language Arts

ONE-OF-A-KIND, DIGITAL LEARNING SOLUTION FOR SCHOOLS & STUDENTS.

BUILDING CURRICULUM ACCOMMODATION PLAN

READING WITH. Reading with Pennsylvania Reading Specialist Certificate

RUBRIC ASSESSMENT: Online Educators

SI Coordinator Handbook. Information, Resources and Forms

Suggested Strategies for Student Engagement

USING DATA TO INFORM INSTRUCTION AND PERSONALIZE LEARNING

Evidence of Learning in the 21 st Century Classroom Classroom Observation Rubric To Guide Leadership for Learning by Instructional Leaders TASK

Why the Affective Domain Matters in Teaching. Barbara J. Millis (H) (C)

Teachers Demonstrate Leadership

MARZANO SCHOOL LEADERSHIP EVALUATION MODEL

Unit/Lesson Planning Guide: Key Questions to Consider While Planning

Writing and Presenting a Persuasive Paper Grade Nine

Gifted & Talented Program Description

Welcome To GATE Parent Information Night

Writing Learning Objectives that Engage Future Engineers: Hands-on & Minds-on Learning Activities

Crosswalk of the New Colorado Principal Standards (proposed by State Council on Educator Effectiveness) with the

TENNESSEE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION

Letter from the Editor-in-Chief: What Makes an Excellent Professor?

Transcription:

safety order CLASSROOM ENVIRONMENT Indicator Description Indicators of Success visible and invisible structures academic atmosphere studentcenteredness The classroom is safe. The teacher is highly proactive in anticipating and addressing possible safety concerns. Teacher arranges physical resources and uses teaching aids (e.g. technology, projection devices, displays, lab areas) skillfully and all learning is equally accessible to all students. Teacher s clear vision and explicit communication of expectations, creates an invisible structure in the classroom that will produce a visible culture of order and discipline where learning can thrive The teacher supports a culture where instructional outcomes and classroom interactions convey high cognitive expectations for most students. Students engage in work of high quality and demonstrate enthusiasm and effort in completing work. Student collaboration is valued and highly encouraged through purposeful classroom arrangement and instructional activities. The teacher is a co-learner. Students are encouraged to reflect and synthesize what they are learning to encourage deeper understandings. Teacher responds to lack of student-engagement with flexibility and Work space is free from obstacles-i.e. cords, etc. Learning tools are available but safely displayed and easily accessible. Equal access to classroom materials and resources Teaching aids have a place and are easily accessible for the teacher so transitions are smooth. Room has student resources neatly and intentionally placed to support learning. Room has desks or tables arranged for collaborative and cooperative groupings. Sections of the room are clearly identified for different types of work (e.g. reading area, computer work, etc.) Learning objectives are posted Academic supports (e.g., wall posters) are clearly displayed. Student learning goals are displayed and/or charted. Teacher and students set goals for learning that are attainable and with high expectations Students have access to other students during learning time Students interact with others and discuss content collaboratively. Procedures for group work is evident Teacher is the guide on the side rather than the sage on the stage Content of lesson is interesting and relevant to students.

peer support purposeful/practical space arrangement student-work displays intentionality. Teacher honors student strengths and passion. Students are arranged in collaborative work groups to support each other and have academic conversations The selection and arrangement of student furniture accommodates a variety of learning activities and student collaboration. Traffic flow is primarily smooth. Student created work exemplars are displayed as a reference for students aligned to the currently taught standards. Students share how content relates to their perspective and backgrounds Students take risks by asking questions or proposing nontraditional ways of thinking. Student desks are arranged in groups. Students help each other with procedures as well as content. The teacher encourages student to student support systems. Students discuss content with each other. The furniture in the room is student centered with multiple areas for work and collaborative groups along with areas of differentiation. Student work exemplars are posted and are objective driven and aligned to what is being currently taught CLASSROOM CULTURE Indicator Description Indicators of Success high expectations High expectations for learning and behavior are identified and shared with all students Clear expectations for acceptable student behavior and classroom procedures are established, communicated, modeled, and maintained. Classrooms are task-oriented while the social and emotional needs of students are met through mutual respect and rapport. Classroom schedules are followed, activities are organized, transitions between activities are smooth, and instruction is bell-to bell.

Students ask probing questions about content and their individual work achievement rigor relationships Teacher sets the academic expectations. Goals for achievement are identified and shared with all students. Task and assignments are varied and progress in both difficulty and complexity for all students. There is a high level of thinking that is facilitated by the teacher. Meaningful interactions and interpersonal connections occur between teachers and all students Learning targets are clearly connected to learning activities and IN standards and are stated in terms of student learning. Learning targets and activities reflect different types of learning. Teacher plans ways for students to assume responsibility for their own learning. Teacher uses exemplars of high quality. Tasks follow an appropriate progression of rigor according to the four Webb s Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Levels (e.g., DOK 1 Recall and Reproduction, DOK 2 Skills and Concepts/Basic Reasoning, DOK 3 Strategic Thinking/Complex Reasoning, and DOK 4 Extended Thinking/Reasoning). Tasks and assessments meet each benchmark's Cognitive Complexity rating (e.g., low, moderate, or high). Teachers use inquiry methods to promote conceptual change and a deeper understanding of the content. Students are provided with specific expectations, such as scoring rubrics, to provide students with expectations as to how class assignments are to be completed, the form in which they are to be presented, and the quality of the final product. Students use content specific vocabulary and concepts from other disciplines to connect their work. Learning activities and instructional strategies are informed by knowledge of students skills, interests, cultural backgrounds, language proficiency and exceptionalities. Students volunteer for tasks and show excitement about being in class. Students take risks in their learning without fear of negative

respect Ideas, thoughts, and learning is appreciated by and from all students responses from the teacher or peers. The teacher respects students and conveys personal acceptance of each student. The teacher greets students by name. The teacher is aware of personal goals, interests and activities of students and builds classroom connections. The teacher engages students in specific classroomcommunity and trust-building activities (e.g. shared chores). The teacher holds high expectations of students which are clearly articulated. Students are engaged in specific activities to build positive peer relationships, like peer tutoring, social groups, and afterschool activities. Students are engaged in specific activities to build positive student-staff relationships, including mentoring and tutoring. The teacher quickly addresses potential problems in the classroom. Students show respect with non-verbal cues (e.g, raising hand, eye contact) and don t use negative language towards their peers. tolerance Ideas, thoughts and learning is accepted by and from all students Instructional strategies reflect and respond to cultural values, experience and learning styles of students in the class. Opportunities for community engagement are a priority for school and teachers. Teacher recognizes his/her cultural biases and is aware of how those biases may impact classroom management. Teacher response to student behavior reflects an awareness of cultural differences in verbal and nonverbal cues. Teacher understands the cultural components of the conflict-cycle and intentionally avoids escalating

interactions Classroom establishes a system for regular home-school communication. Students engage in self-study and learn about the norms and values of their culture. collaboration urgency Purposely engaging all students in learning with other learners Effectively creates a positive sense of urgency in classroom performance Teachers incorporate collaborative structures (e.g., think-pairshare), working in pairs, triads, and quads on tasks aligned with the standards during guided practice. Students are active participants in developing hypotheses, designing procedures, carrying out investigations, and analyzing data. Teachers make adjustments to instruction (e.g., pace, modality, questioning, and collaborative structures) for all students in the classroom based on student engagement throughout a lesson. Students engage in accountable talk to show, tell, explain, and prove reasoning during modeled instruction and guided practice. Use time limits for tasks Set specific, daily goals Students are knowledgeable of classroom progress, test scores, grades, etc. Students are motivated to work hard Students receive verbal and/or written praise to reward students for their efforts Students demonstrate intrinsic motivation Students have internalized the value of hard work Students demonstrate pride in their accomplishments

BEHAVIOR MANAGEMENT Indicator Description Indicators of Success efficiency Behavior management does not interfere with instruction. Students transition quickly to complete tasks without disruption. Teacher provides explicit instructions to increase efficiency. effectiveness respect Appropriate behavior techniques are utilized in such a way that student behavior is modified effectively. Positive Relationship (student to student/teacher to student/ student to teacher) Polite language is used in the classroom Good Rapport Student s respond promptly and positively to behavior management techniques. Teachers are responsive to student needs by making necessary adjustments based on the body language and non-verbal cues of their students. Teachers and students are using polite language with each other and visitors. Teachers demonstrate good rapport with the students. (Ex. humor, positive facial expressions, questioning) rules and routines Students know, understand and demonstrate classroom expectations. Posted rules or expectations (Ex. PBIS Charts) Posted behavior management system (Ex. Class DoJo, Clip Chart, PBIS Charts) Evidence of rules and routines are demonstrated by students consistently. Students stay in learning space; listen for directions Teacher is explicit in instructions for learning tasks. compliance Student behavior aligns with posted expectations. Teachers address behaviors not aligned to posted expectations. Teachers reinforce positive student behavior. Students follow directions given without disruption. INSTRUCTIONAL EXECUTION

Indicator Description Indicators of Success objective-driven knowledge or skill development levels of connections being made rigor differentiation Objectives are standard driven and aligned to IN State standards. They include a high level of rigor. Students are working building their skills and knowledge through rigorous tasks. lesson connects to real-world context, other content areas, and students personal interests Tasks and assignments are varied and progress in both difficulty and complexity for all students. There is a high level of thinking that is facilitated by the teacher. Critical thinking and problem solving are embedded into the lesson. All students are provided equal access to material and instruction that is at their instructional levels. Teacher posts and refers to the lesson objective multiple times during the lesson. Rigorous lesson objectives are written to align to the IN state standards. Students can verbalize the objective of the lesson. Teacher identifies appropriate types of knowledge for skill development. (ie: introductory knowledge vs. complex analysis) Students are provided the opportunity to show mastery of skills or progression of knowledge through rigorous tasks. Teacher provides real-life scenarios and examples to connect content to the lesson. Teacher provides direct instruction with vocabulary terms to connect content to examples. Students can articulate connections to their own lives to provide a context for relevance of the lesson. Teacher asks higher order questions that follows Blooms and DOK levels. Teacher plans for and encourages academically challenging problem-solving tasks that require students to provide evidence. Instructional models are varied, providing both procedure and application opportunities. Text complexity for reading areas is appropriate. Tasks are complex and require students to address content in unique and multiple ways. Students work towards application of new knowledge rather than rote memorization of facts. Teacher facilitates whole group, small group, and individual work that provides students with work that is relevant to their levels, interests, and learning styles. Teacher is aware of different types of learners in the classroom

student practice pacing checking for understanding higher order thinking students interests and backgrounds Students are actively engaged in a task that provides opportunities to apply new knowledge The lesson follows a smooth pace transition time is limited. The teacher regularly checks students progress throughout the lesson to determine understanding. Discussions, questions, and comments are indicative of higher level cognitive processing The lesson provides students options and relates to student life experiences and perspectives. and provides multiple layers of instructions based upon the needs of students. Curriculum is differentiated in multiple ways (content, process, and product) Students show their understanding in a multitude of ways (e.g. worksheets, computer tasks, projects, verbal questioning, etc.) Students are engaging in the new knowledge learned through practice. Teacher assigns tasks that are aligned to the objective. Teacher provides a gradual release of responsibility to students. Teacher continuously moves the lesson along while addressing student learning questions. Teacher provides adequate wait time for student responses. Disruptions are limited because the teacher has provided clear expectations and directions for their tasks. The teacher utilizes higher order thinking questions to check understanding of student learning and remediates as necessary. The teacher quickly addresses misconceptions that occur. Teacher provides feedback to students on knowledge gains. Formative assessment tools are used throughout the lesson Uses rubrics to guide students in their own understanding. Students understand how they will be assessed. The teacher utilizes higher level questions from Bloom s/dok to garner student responses. The teacher pushes students to dig deeper, go further, and ask bigger questions to deepen their knowledge. Students question each other to lead to a bigger conversation. They do not accept one way to solve a problem. The teacher builds the lesson to align to student interests and backgrounds. The teacher builds background for new knowledge.

Students are provided multiple options for engaging in the content. Digital tools and technology are utilized as part of the lesson and student work time. on-task ENGAGEMENT Indicator Description Indicators of Success students personal interest level Students are actively participating in the learning activities proposed by the teacher. The lesson content, material, activities and instructional methods connect with students interests, strengths and backgrounds. Pacing of the lesson is balanced to keep students attention. Students make eye contact with the teacher and respond to questions posed by the teacher and/or peers. Students participate in multiple ways to show mastery of new knowledge (written work, verbal questions, discussions, experiments, projects, etc.) Teacher provides hands-on experiences for students to learn and practice new content. The teacher scaffolds instruction to ensure all students have equal access to the work. The teacher constantly monitors for student attention and redirects off-task students via verbal and non-verbal cues. The students demonstrate enthusiasm and excitement about the content. Students interact with and react to the material on a personal level. The teacher demonstrates enthusiasm and intensity. The teacher verbalizes the connections while presenting lessons and intentionally relates content to student interests The teacher encourages students to respond frequently. The teacher varies instructional strategies and includes materials

making relevant connections The lesson provides opportunities for students to find connections among themselves and within the subjects and tasks that the teacher asks them to perform. and activities that promote active engagement. (ie: games, controversy, debates, etc.) The teacher provides opportunities for students to engage in work that is their own design. (ie: projects) Students verbalize the connections they discover The teacher activates students background knowledge/schema to connect the new subjects/activities Teacher verbalizes real-world and other content connections while presenting lessons. The teacher encourages students to make real world connections. The teacher provides various complex tasks that require application of knowledge.

Resource List Brookhart, Susan. (2010). How to assess higher order thinking skills in your classroom. Alexandria, VA. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD). Dunsworth, Mardale. (2009). The high-performing school: Benchmarking the 10 indicators of effectiveness. Bloomington, IN. The Solution Tree. Fisher, Douglas & Frey, Nancy. (2011). The purposeful classroom: How to structure lessons with learning goals in mind. Alexandria, VA. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD). Frontier, Tony & Rickabaugh, James. (2014). Five Levers to Improve Learning: How to Prioritize for Powerful Results in Your School. Alexandria, VA. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD). Lemov, Doug. (2010). Teach like a champion: 49 techniques that put students on the path to college. San Francisco, CA. John Wiley & Sons. Lezotte, Larry. (2002). Closing the achievement gap: No excuses. Houston, TX. American Productivity & Quality Center. Marzano, Robert. (2013). What works in schools: Translating research into action. Alexandria, VA. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD). Marzano. Robert & Pickering, Debra. (2011). The highly engaged classroom. Bloomington, IN. Marzano Research Laboratory. Payne, Ruby. (1996). A framework for understanding poverty. Highlands, TX. Aha! Process, Inc. Tomlinson, Carol Ann & Allan, Susan. (2000). Leadership for differentiating schools & classrooms. Alexandria, VA. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD). Westerberg, Tim. (2009). Becoming a great high school: 6 strategies and 1 attitude that make a difference. Alexandria, VA. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).